Development of Alternate Methods for Establishing Design Margins for ASME Section VIII Division 3

Author(s):  
Susumu Terada

The design margin against collapse for Division 3 is based on Nadai’s equation. For high strength materials (the ratio of Sy/Su is more than 0.9) this method is adequate. However for the material with lower ratio of Sy/Su than 0.9 this method has additional margin from entire yielding through the thickness to collapse. The experimental burst test results for closed-end cylinder show the excessive margin for these materials. Therefore the development of alternate methods for establishing design margins for all materials is desirable. In this paper the experimental burst test results, case study of various methods (Div.2 rewrite, current Div.3 and proposed method) for design pressure are investigated.

Author(s):  
Susumu Terada

The design margin against collapse for Division 3 is based on Nadal’s equation. For high strength material this method is adequate. However for material with a lower ratio of Sy/Su this method has additional margin from yielding through the thickness to final collapse or burst. The experimental burst test results for closed-end cylinder show the excessive margin for these materials as stated in former paper. Therefore the development of alternate methods for establishing design margin for all materials is desirable. The design margin of 1.5 in equation for open-end cylindrical shell and spherical shell in current code is different from that of 1.732 for closed-end cylindrical shell. The design margin of elastic-plastic analysis is 1.732. Therefore the consistent design margins of equations and elastic-plastic analysis for open-end cylindrical shells and spherical shells are also desirable. In this paper new equations for design pressure of cylindrical shell and spherical shell are proposed by investigation of burst test results and case studies of various methods.


Author(s):  
Susumu Terada

The current upper limit of hydrostatic test pressure in KT-3 of ASME Sec. VIII Division 3 is determined by general yielding through the thickness obtained by Nadai’s equation with a design factor of 0.866 (= 1.732/2). On the other hand, the upper limit of hydrostatic test pressure in 4.1.6 of the ASME Sec. VIII Division 2 is determined by general yielding through the thickness with a design factor of 0.95. In cases where a ratio of hydrostatic test pressure to design pressure of 1.43 similar to PED (Pressure Equipment Directive) is requested, the upper limit of hydrostatic test pressure may be critical for vessel design when material with a ratio of yield strength to tensile strength less than 0.7 is used. In order to satisfy the requirements in KT-3, it is necessary to decrease design pressure or increase wall thickness. Therefore, it is proposed to change the design factor of intermediate strength materials to obtain the upper limit of hydrostatic test pressure. In this paper, a new design factor to obtain the upper limit of hydrostatic test pressure is proposed and the validity of this proposal was investigated by burst test results and elastic-plastic analysis.


Author(s):  
Wolf Reinhardt ◽  
Xinjian Duan

The result of a burst test of a thinned straight pipe with local thinning is reported. The locally thinned region had a thickness well below the NB-3600 pressure based Design thickness. The burst pressure is compared with the maximum Design pressure obtained from a variety of elastic-plastic analysis methods, such as plastic limit analysis and the Section VIII Div. 2 elastic-plastic design method.


Author(s):  
Nathan Barkley ◽  
Matt Riley

Abstract For new ASME pressure vessel designs that have a design pressure less than 10,000 psi (70 MPa), it is commonly questioned whether Section VIII, Division 1 or Division 2 should be used as the code of construction. Each code offers specific advantages and disadvantages depending on the specific vessel considered. Further complicating the various considerations is the new Mandatory Appendix 46 of Division 1 which allows the design rules of Division 2 to be used for Division 1 designs. With the various options available, determining the best approach can be challenging and is often more complex than only determining which code provides the thinnest wall thickness. This paper attempts to address many of the typical considerations that determine the use of Division 1 or Division 2 as the code of construction. Items to be considered may include administrative burden, certification process, design margins, design rules, and examination and testing requirements. From the considerations presented, specific comparisons are made between the two divisions with notable differences highlighted. Finally, sample evaluations are presented to illustrate the differences between each code of construction for identical design conditions. Also, material and labor estimates are compiled for each case study to provide a realistic comparison of the expected differential cost between the construction codes.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Casadei ◽  
Antonio Nanni ◽  
Tarek Alkhrdaji ◽  
Jay Thomas

In the fall of 2002, a two-storey parking garage in Bloomington, Indiana, built with precast prestrestressed concrete (PC) double-T beams, was decommissioned due to a need for increased parking-space. This led to the opportunity of investigating the flexural performance of the PC double-T beams, upgraded in the positive moment region with steel reinforced polymer (SRP) composite materials, representing the first case study where this material has been applied in the field. SRP makes use of high-strength steel cords embedded in an epoxy resin. This paper reports on the test results to failure of three beams: a control specimen, a beam strengthened with one ply of SRP and a third beam strengthened with two plies of SRP anchored at both ends with SRP U-wraps. Results showed that SRP can significantly improve both flexural capacity and enhance pseudo-ductility. Preliminary analytical work shows that the same approach used for externally bonded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) can be satisfactorly used for SRP.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudarmadi Sudarmadi

In this paper a case study about concrete strength assessment of bridge structure experiencing fire is discussed. Assessment methods include activities of visual inspection, concrete testing by Hammer Test, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test, and Core Test. Then, test results are compared with the requirement of RSNI T-12-2004. Test results show that surface concrete at the location of fire deteriorates so that its quality is decreased into the category of Very Poor with ultrasonic pulse velocity ranges between 1,14 – 1,74 km/s. From test results also it can be known that concrete compressive strength of inner part of bridge pier ranges about 267 – 274 kg/cm2 and concrete compressive strength of beam and plate experiencing fire directly is about 173 kg/cm2 and 159 kg/cm2. It can be concluded that surface concrete strength at the location of fire does not meet the requirement of RSNI T-12-2004. So, repair on surface concrete of pier, beam, and plate at the location of fire is required.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2589
Author(s):  
Jung J. Kim

This study presents an explosion-resistant hybrid system containing a steel slab and a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) frame. CFRP, which is a high-strength material, acts as an impact reflection part. Steel slab, which is a high-ductility material, plays a role as an impact energy absorption part. Based on the elastoplastic behavior of steel, a numerical model is proposed to simulate the dynamic responses of the hybrid system under the air pressure from an explosion. Based on this, a case study is conducted to analyze and identify the optimal design of the proposed hybrid system, which is subjected to an impact load condition. The observations from the case study show the optimal thicknesses of 8.2 and 7 mm for a steel slab and a ϕ100 mm CFRP pipe for the hybrid system, respectively. In addition, the ability of the proposed hybrid system to resist an uncertain explosion is demonstrated in the case study based on the reliability methodology.


2011 ◽  
Vol 121-126 ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Lei Xu ◽  
Tao Meng ◽  
Miao Zhou Huang

In this paper, effects of nano-CaCO3 on compressive strength and Microstructure of high strength concrete in standard curing temperature(21±1°C) and low curing temperature(6.5±1°C) was studied. In order to improve the early strength of the concrete in low temperature, the early strength agent calcium nitrite was added into. Test results indicated that 0.5% dosage of nano-CaCO3 could inhibit the effect of calcium nitrite as early strength agent, but 1% and 2% dosage of nano-CaCO3 could improve the strength of the concrete by 13% and 18% in standard curing temperature and by 17% and 14% in low curing temperature at the age of 3days. According to the XRD spectrum, with the dosage up to 1% to 2%, nano-CaCO3 can change the orientation index significantly, leading to the improvement of strength of concrete both in standard curing temperature and low curing temperature.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eethar Thanon Dawood ◽  
Mahyuddin Ramli

This study was conducted to determine some physical and mechanical properties of high-strength flowable mortar reinforced with different percentages of palm fiber (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6% as volumetric fractions). The density, compressive strength, flexural strength, and toughness index were tested to determine the mechanical properties of this mortar. Test results illustrate that the inclusion of this fiber reduces the density of mortar. The use of 0.6% of palm fiber increases the compressive strength and flexural strength by about 15.1%, and 16%, respectively; besides, the toughness index (I5) of the high-strength flowable mortar has been significantly enhanced by the use of 1% and more of palm fiber.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document