Development of a Lateral Mobility Task to Identify Individuals at Risk for Mobility Disability and Functional Decline

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony P. Marsh ◽  
W. Jack Rejeski ◽  
Stacy L. Hutton ◽  
Cristal L. Brown ◽  
Edward Ip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Decline ◽  
Knee Extensor ◽  
Lateral Mobility ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Functional Reach ◽  
Knee Extensor Strength ◽  
Stance Time ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Lateral mobility is integral to many activities of daily living involving transfer from one position to another. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the validity and test–retest reliability of a lateral-mobility (LATMOB) task for older adults. Measurements of lateral mobility, balance, and strength and self-reported and performance-based physical functioning were obtained in 63 women and 77 men ≥50 years of age. The LATMOB task was significantly correlated with age, knee-extensor strength, grip strength, functional reach, and one-leg-stance time. Test–retest reliability of the task was excellent. The LATMOB task was highly correlated with the car task. Balance was significantly correlated with time to get into and out of a car and performance on the LATMOB task. The LATMOB task was significantly correlated with the Short Physical Performance Battery score. The LATMOB task is valid and reliable, but additional work is needed to assess its sensitivity to change and predictive validity.

scholarly journals A portable isometric knee extensor strength testing device: test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores of the Q-Force ӀӀ in healthy adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanneke Hartog ◽  
Sandra Dijkstra ◽  
Joke Fleer ◽  
Pim van der Harst ◽  
Massimo A. Mariani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Standardized Test ◽  
Knee Extensor ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Knee Extensor Strength ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Although knee extensors are essential in daily activities (e.g. walking, climbing stairs), knee extensor strength is often not measured in clinical settings. Existing devices to test muscle strength are not always suitable to accurately measure the high forces of this muscle group. Therefore, a device to test muscle strength that is convenient, feasible, reliable, and valid in clinical settings is required. This study evaluated the reliability, responsiveness, and level of discomfort of the newly developed Q-Force ӀӀ (i.e. a portable device to measure isometric knee extensor strength) in healthy middle-aged and elderly adults. Methods Participants (n = 22) conducted two standardized test sessions on the Q-Force ӀӀ (five to ten days apart). Each session consisted of one familiarisation trial followed by three trials of peak isometric knee extension per each leg. Per trial, peak and mean knee extension force (N) and torque (Nm) were measured at 90° flexion. The level of discomfort was determined using a visual analog scale (VAS: 0-100). Intra Class Correlation (ICC, model: two-way mixed with absolute agreement), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were determined. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine between-test variation. Results Excellent test-retest (ICC > 0.95) and inter-trial (ICC > 0.91) reliability for both legs were shown. No significant differences were found in peak and mean knee forces and torques between test and retest of both legs, indicating good test-retest reliability (P-value range: 0.360-0.538; F(1,21) range: 0.4-0.9). The SEM of the peak and mean forces and torques ranged from 28.0 to 30.4 N (6.0-6.8%) and from 9.2 to 10.4 Nm (6.4-7.7%), respectively. The MDC for these outcomes ranged respectively from 77.6 to 84.1 N (16.5-18.8%) and from 25.5 to 28.9 Nm (17.6-21.4%). The level of discomfort was low (median range: 7-10, IQR: 4-18). Conclusion The portable Q-Force ӀӀ is a comfortable, responsive, and relatively cheap device with excellent test-retest reliability. This device would be potentially suitable to measure isometric knee extensor strength in clinical settings.

scholarly journals Walking time measures for evaluating OA of the knee

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
R. Marks
Keyword(s):  
Functional Performance ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Knee Extensor ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Knee Extensor Strength ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Walking Tests ◽  
Experimental Subjects ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Walking Time

This study assessed the test-retest reliability and the sensitivity of self-paced walking time measurements for evaluating the functional performance of persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The 13 m timed walking tests were carried out on two separate occasions over a six-week period for 10 patients using a standardised protocol. The same measurements were recorded also for three additional patients before and after a six-week quadriceps strength training regimen. As indicated by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 with no significant intersession test differences for the group (P=0.98), the gait measurements were reliable. However, despite marked increase in knee extensor strength and significant subjective improvements in walking time for the three experimental subjects were smaller than the error of measurement. The findings suggest that regardless of reliability, measurements of self-paced level walking time might not be sufficiently sensitive for evaluating longitudinal changes in functional performance in this patient population.

scholarly journals Should We Use Unilateral or Bilateral Tasks to Assess Maximal and Explosive Knee Extensor Strength in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis? A Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 4353
Author(s):  
Jonas Pfeifle ◽  
David Hasler ◽  
Nicola Maffiuletti
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Knee Extensor ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Strength Performance ◽  
Explosive Strength ◽  
Knee Extensor Strength ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Voluntary Contractions

Deficits in maximal and explosive knee extensor strength, which are usually assessed with unilateral tasks, are substantial in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of unilateral vs. bilateral tasks for assessing knee extensor strength in patients with KOA. This was achieved primarily by comparing unilateral and bilateral inter-limb strength asymmetries and secondarily by examining the relationship between unilaterally and bilaterally measured strength, and performance-based and self-reported function. Twenty-four patients with unilateral KOA (mean age: 65 ± 7 years) performed isometric gradual and explosive maximal voluntary contractions to assess, respectively their maximal and explosive strength. Performance-based and self-reported function were also evaluated with standard functional tests and questionnaires, respectively. Inter-limb asymmetries of maximal and explosive strength did not differ significantly between unilateral (mean asymmetry: 26 ± 15%) and bilateral tasks (22 ± 21%). In the same way, the relationships between knee extensor strength—measured either unilaterally or bilaterally—and performance-based or self-reported function were not influenced by the type of task. In conclusion, it does not seem to make a difference in terms of clinical relevance whether maximal and explosive knee extensor strength are evaluated with unilateral or bilateral tasks in KOA patients.

scholarly journals Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks

2020 ◽  
pp. 174702182092919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alasdair DF Clarke ◽  
Jessica L Irons ◽  
Warren James ◽  
Andrew B Leber ◽  
Amelia R Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Visual Search ◽  
Search Task ◽  
The Other ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Search Tasks ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Context Specific ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Over Time

A striking range of individual differences has recently been reported in three different visual search tasks. These differences in performance can be attributed to strategy, that is, the efficiency with which participants control their search to complete the task quickly and accurately. Here, we ask whether an individual’s strategy and performance in one search task is correlated with how they perform in the other two. We tested 64 observers and found that even though the test–retest reliability of the tasks was high, an observer’s performance and strategy in one task was not predictive of their behaviour in the other two. These results suggest search strategies are stable over time, but context-specific. To understand visual search, we therefore need to account not only for differences between individuals but also how individuals interact with the search task and context.

scholarly journals The Modified Gait Efficacy Scale: Establishing the Psychometric Properties in Older Adults

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaina M. Newell ◽  
Jessie M. VanSwearingen ◽  
Elizabeth Hile ◽  
Jennifer S. Brach
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Community Dwelling Older Adults

BackgroundPerceived ability or confidence plays an important role in determining function and behavior. The modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) is a 10-item self-report measure used to assess walking confidence under challenging everyday circumstances.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the mGES as a measure of gait in older adults.DesignThis was a cross-sectional study.MethodsParticipants were 102 community-dwelling older adults (mean [±SD] age=78.6±6.1 years) who were independent in ambulation with or without an assistive device. Participants were assessed using the mGES and measures of confidence and fear, measures of function and disability, and performance-based measures of mobility. In a subsample (n=26), the mGES was administered twice within a 1-month period to establish test-retest reliability through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]). The standard error of measure (SEM) was determined from the ICC and standard deviation. The Cronbach α value was calculated to determine internal consistency. To establish the validity of the mGES, the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient was used to examine the association with measures of confidence, fear, gait, and physical function and disability.ResultsThe mGES demonstrated test-retest reliability within the 1-month period (ICC=.93, 95% confidence interval=.85, .97). The SEM of the mGES was 5.23. The mGES was internally consistent across the 10 items (Cronbach α=.94). The mGES was related to measures of confidence and fear (r=.54–.88), function and disability (Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument, r=.32–.88), and performance-based mobility (r=.38–.64).LimitationsThis study examined only community-dwelling older adults. The results, therefore, should not be generalized to other patient populations.ConclusionThe mGES is a reliable and valid measure of confidence in walking among community-dwelling older adults.

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of a clinical non-exercise method for assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness using seismocardiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Thunestvedt Hansen ◽  
T Roemer ◽  
A Hoejgaard ◽  
K Husted ◽  
K Soerensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiorespiratory Fitness ◽  
Exercise Test ◽  
Indirect Calorimetry ◽  
Recording Device ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Graded Exercise Test ◽  
Graded Exercise ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Introduction Low cardiorespiratory fitness expressed as a low maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality (1). Thus, V̇O2max is recognised as an important clinical tool in the assessment of patients (1,2). However, assessment of V̇O2max by exercise testing is both physically demanding and methodologically challenging and hence the clinical applicability is limited. Purpose Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of a clinical non-exercise method for assessment of V̇O2max. Methods On three separate days 20 healthy men (n=10) and women (n=10) with varying age (22–72 years) and fitness levels performed two tests for determination of V̇O2max; (a) a non-exercise test using seismocardiography (SCG V̇O2max) and (b) a graded exercise test to voluntary exhaustion on a cycle ergometer based on indirect calorimetry (IC V̇O2max). These tests were performed in order to examine the day-to-day reliability and the validity of SCG V̇O2max, respectively. Furthermore, SCG V̇O2max was assessed twice on each test day to investigate test-retest reliability. The SCG V̇O2max was performed in prone position following a short resting period by placing the SCG recording device on the xiphisternal joint with double adhesive tape. V̇O2max was assessed during a 5-minute recording of the sternal movement using SCG in combination with demographic data of the participants (3). In addition, body composition was measured and a resting blood sample collected each test day. Results On average SCG V̇O2max was 3.3±2.4 ml/min/kg (mean ± 95% CI) lower than IC V̇O2max (p=0.013, SCG V̇O2max: 36.6±3.3 ml/min/kg, IC V̇O2max: 39.9±3.0 ml/min/kg). A significant positive correlation was found between SCG V̇O2max and IC V̇O2max (Pearson, r=0.72, p<0.001). Both SCG V̇O2max and IC V̇O2max was similar between test days (p=0.972) and the intra-individual coefficient of variation was 4.5±2.9% and 4.0±2.5%, respectively. Within each test day SCG V̇O2max was highly correlated (r=0.99, p<0.0001) and no difference was observed between tests (p=0.993). Conclusions The accuracy of the current non-exercise assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness based on seismocardiography is not optimal as SCG V̇O2max was systematically lower than the gold standard assessment applying indirect calorimetry during a graded exercise test. Despite the abovementioned difference, SCG V̇O2max and IC V̇O2max were highly correlated. Furthermore, the precision of SCG V̇O2max is very high as both day-to-day and test-retest reliability were high. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): VentriJect ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark

scholarly journals Reliability of the performance-based measure of executive functions in people with schizophrenia

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
En-Chi Chiu ◽  
Ya-Chen Lee ◽  
Shu-Chun Lee ◽  
I-Ping Hsueh
Keyword(s):  
Executive Functions ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Rater Agreement ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Purposive Action ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Agreement Study ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background The Performance-based measure of Executive Functions (PEF) with four domains is designed to assess executive functions in people with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the PEF administered by the same rater (intra-rater agreement) and by different raters (inter-rater agreement) in people with schizophrenia and to estimate the values of minimal detectable change (MDC) and MDC%. Methods Two convenience samples (each sample, n = 60) with schizophrenia were conducted two assessments (two weeks apart). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was analyzed to examine intra-rater and inter-rater agreements of the test-retest reliability of the PEF. The MDC was calculated through standard error of measurement. Results For the intra-rater agreement study, the ICC values of the four domains were 0.88–0.92. The MDC (MDC%) of the four domains (volition, planning, purposive action, and perfromance effective) were 13.0 (13.0%), 12.2 (16.4%), 16.2 (16.2%), and 16.3 (18.8%), respectively. For the inter-rater agreement study, the ICC values of the four domains were 0.82–0.89. The MDC (MDC%) were 15.8 (15.8%), 17.4 (20.0%), 20.9 (20.9%), and 18.6 (18.6%) for the volition, planning, purposive action, and performance effective domains, respectively. Conclusions The PEF has good test-retest reliability, including intra-rater and inter-rater agreements, for people with schizophrenia. Clinicians and researchers can use the MDC values to verify whether an individual with schizophrenia shows any real change (improvement or deterioration) between repeated PEF assessments by the same or different raters.

scholarly journals Test-retest reliability of the HEXACO-100—And the value of multiple measurements for assessing reliability

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0262465
Author(s):  
Sam Henry ◽  
Isabel Thielmann ◽  
Tom Booth ◽  
René Mõttus
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Rater Agreement ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Validity Criterion ◽  
Multiple Measurements ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Hexaco Model

Despite the widespread use of the HEXACO model as a descriptive taxonomy of personality traits, there remains limited information on the test-retest reliability of its commonly-used inventories. Studies typically report internal consistency estimates, such as alpha or omega, but there are good reasons to believe that these do not accurately assess reliability. We report 13-day test-retest correlations of the 100- and 60-item English HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-100 and HEXACO-60) domains, facets, and items. In order to test the validity of test-retest reliability, we then compare these estimates to correlations between self- and informant-reports (i.e., cross-rater agreement), a widely-used validity criterion. Median estimates of test-retest reliability were .88, .81, and .65 (N = 416) for domains, facets, and items, respectively. Facets’ and items’ test-retest reliabilities were highly correlated with their cross-rater agreement estimates, whereas internal consistencies were not. Overall, the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised demonstrates test-retest reliability similar to other contemporary measures. We recommend that short-term retest reliability should be routinely calculated to assess reliability.

scholarly journals Test-Retest Reliability and the Learning Effect on Isokinetic Fatigue in Female Master’s Cyclists

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jordan M. Glenn ◽  
Michelle Gray ◽  
Nicole E. Moyen ◽  
Jennifer L. Vincenzo ◽  
Kylie K. Harmon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Effect ◽  
Female Athletes ◽  
Peak Torque ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Time To Peak ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: Isokinetic exercise is commonly used as a benchmark for strength and performance. Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to establish isokinetic fatigue test-retest reliability and examine the learning effect when testing without familiarization. Methods: 22 masters-aged [53±5 years), competitive female cyclists completed 3 separate 50-repetition knee flexion/extension tests on a Biodex, separated by one-week with no familiarization. Test-retest reliability [intra-class correlation [ICC]), 95% confidence intervals [CI), technical error of measurement [TEM) were calculated. Results: ICCs between trials exhibited excellent reliability during extension [.93–.97) and flexion [.93–.97) for all variables except time to peak torque [ICC=.35 and.45 for extension and flexion, respectively) and fatigue index [ICC=.47 for flexion). Relative TEM was minimal for extension between trial 1 and trial 2 [0.27%–0.97%) and between trial 2 and trial 3 [0.27%–1.45%) for all variables. Similar results were observed for flexion between trial 1 and trial 2 [0.87%–2.45%) and between trial 2 and trial 3 [0.54%–1.10%). No differences [Wilks Λ>.05) existed between trials, indicating no learning effect associated with the tests. Conclusions: There was strong test-retest reliability in masters-aged, female athletes and no learning effect was associated with the Biodex during a knee extension/flexion fatigue protocol.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document