scholarly journals Unorthodox Parenteral β-Lactam and β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Flouting Antimicrobial Stewardship and Compromising Patient Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Snehal Palwe ◽  
Balaji Veeraraghavan ◽  
Hariharan Periasamy ◽  
Kshama Khobragade ◽  
Arun S. Kharat
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Drug Development ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Resistance Development ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
India And China ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

ABSTRACT In India and China, indigenous drug manufacturers market arbitrarily combined parenteral β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitors (BL-BLIs). In these fixed-dose combinations, sulbactam or tazobactam is indiscriminately combined with parenteral cephalosporins, with BLI doses kept in ratios similar to those for the approved BL-BLIs. Such combinations have been introduced into clinical practice without mandatory drug development studies involving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, safety, and efficacy assessments being undertaken. Such unorthodox combinations compromise clinical outcomes and also potentially contribute to resistance development.

scholarly journals Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and β-Lactam Cross-Reactivity

Pharmacy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saira B. Chaudhry ◽  
Michael P. Veve ◽  
Jamie L. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Penicillin Allergy ◽  
Side Chain ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
History Of

Cephalosporins are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes due to their wide clinical utility and general tolerability, with approximately 1–3% of the population reporting a cephalosporin allergy. However, clinicians may avoid the use of cephalosporins in patients with reported penicillin allergies despite the low potential for cross-reactivity. The misdiagnosis of β-lactam allergies and misunderstanding of cross-reactivity among β-lactams, including within the cephalosporin class, often leads to use of broader spectrum antibiotics with poor safety and efficacy profiles and represents a serious obstacle for antimicrobial stewardship. Risk factors for cephalosporin allergies are broad and include female sex, advanced age, and a history of another antibiotic or penicillin allergy; however, cephalosporins are readily tolerated even among individuals with true immediate-type allergies to penicillins. Cephalosporin cross-reactivity potential is related to the structural R1 side chain, and clinicians should be cognizant of R1 side chain similarities when prescribing alternate β-lactams in allergic individuals or when new cephalosporins are brought to market. Clinicians should consider the low likelihood of true cephalosporin allergy when clinically indicated. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the role of cephalosporins in clinical practice, and to highlight the incidence of, risk factors for, and cross-reactivity of cephalosporins with other antibiotics.

Reduction of Antimicrobial Resistance and Limiting Use of Antibiotics by the Application of De-escalation and Streamlining: A Review Update

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-142
Author(s):  
Ritu Saha ◽  
Bhuiyan Mohammad Mahtab Uddin
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Resistance Development ◽  
The Real ◽  
Different Types

De-escalation is a critical component that lies at the center of antimicrobial stewardship programs. It is a clinically effective concept in reducing infection with drug resistant isolates. Although there is significant and serious shortfalls like establishment of the real impact of de-escalation on antimicrobial resistance development; it is now well demonstrated that there is no harm for patients, whether it genuinely improve clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to establish the most effective tools to implement de-escalation, particularly in terms of providing clear guidelines to clinicians to enable them to be confident in applying this maneuver in our country. It is interesting that this concept of de-escalation is now being explored in different types of infection. Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, 2020;6(2): 140-142

Debates in Dysphagia Management: How Do You Use Evidence-Based Practice in Your Dysphagia Patient Care?

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Do So

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.

Impact of removing ESBL designation from culture reports on the selection of antibiotics for the treatment of infections associated with ESBL-producing organisms

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 604-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Lesher ◽  
Cory M. Hale ◽  
Dona S. S. Wijetunge ◽  
Matt R. England ◽  
Debra S. Myers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Inhibitor Combination ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor ◽  
Selection Of

AbstractWe characterized the impact of removal of the ESBL designation from microbiology reports on inpatient antibiotic prescribing. Definitive prescribing of carbapenems decreased from 48.4% to 16.1% (P = .01) and β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combination increased from 19.4% to 61.3% (P = .002). Our findings confirm the importance of collaboration between microbiology and antimicrobial stewardship programs.

scholarly journals 229. Hospitalists Antimicrobial Scorecard Improves Antibiotic Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Julia Sessa ◽  
Helen Jacoby ◽  
Bruce Blain ◽  
Lisa Avery
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Measuring antimicrobial consumption data is a foundation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. There is data to support antimicrobial scorecard utilization to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. There is a lack of data on the impact of an antimicrobial scorecard for hospitalists. Our objective was to improve antibiotic prescribing amongst the hospitalist service through the development of an antimicrobial scorecard. Methods Conducted in a 451-bed teaching hospital amongst 22 full time hospitalists. The antimicrobial scorecard for 2019 was distributed in two phases. In October 2019, baseline antibiotic prescribing data (January – September 2019) was distributed. In January 2020, a second scorecard was distributed (October – December 2019) to assess the impact of the scorecard. The scorecard distributed via e-mail to physicians included: Antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days (corrected for attending census), route of antibiotic prescribing (% intravenous (IV) vs % oral (PO)) and percentage of patients prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for greater than 3 days. Hospitalists received their data in rank order amongst their peers. Along with the antimicrobial scorecard, recommendations from the antimicrobial stewardship team were included for hospitalists to improve their antibiotic prescribing for these initiatives. Hospitalists demographics (years of practice and gender) were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze pre and post data. Results Sixteen (16) out of 22 (73%) hospitalists improved their antibiotic prescribing from pre- to post-scorecard (χ 2(1)=3.68, p = 0.055). The median antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days decreased from 661 pre-scorecard to 618 post-scorecard (p = 0.043). The median PT use greater than 3 days also decreased significantly, from 18% pre-scorecard to 11% post-scorecard (p = 0.0025). There was no change in % of IV antibiotic prescribing and no correlation between years of experience or gender to antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion Providing antimicrobial scorecards to our hospitalist service resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days and PT prescribing beyond 3 days. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 110. Impact of Diagnostic and Antimicrobial Stewardship on Time-to-Appropriate Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Multi-Drug Resistant Pseudomonas Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S69-S70
Author(s):  
Katie A McCrink ◽  
Kailynn DeRonde ◽  
Adriana Jimenez ◽  
Gemma Rosello ◽  
Yoichiro Natori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Appropriate Therapy ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Timely effective therapy in multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas (PsA) infections has a direct impact on patient survival. We aimed to determine the impact of diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) on time-to-appropriate therapy (TAP) and clinical outcomes of patients with MDR PsA infections utilizing novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs). Methods Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with MDR PsA infections at a 1,500-bed University-affiliated public hospital in Miami, Florida who received ≥72 hours of ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A) or ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). During the pre-intervention period (12/2017-12/2018), additional susceptibilities for C/A and C/T were performed upon providers’ request. In the post intervention period (01/2019 – 12/2019), we implemented automatic reflex algorithms (Figure 1) for faster identification and susceptibilities for MDR PsA, including carbapenemase producers. Results were communicated in real-time to the AMS team. Figure 1. Reflex Testing Algorithm for MDR Pseudomonas Isolates from Any Source Results Seventy-six patients were included; median age was 56 years (IQR 37.5–67.0), 40 (52.6%) were in an intensive care unit at time of culture collection; median APACHE II score was 20 (IQR 15.0 – 26.0). Three isolates were carbapenemase producers (VIM = 2; KPC = 1). The most common infections were pneumonia (56.6%) and bacteremia (18.4%). We found a significant decrease in median TAP (120.1 [IQR 82.5–164.6] vs 75.9 [IQR 51.3–101.7] hours, p = 0.003). Median time from culture collection to final susceptibility results was shorter in the post-intervention group (122.2 vs 90.5 hours; p < 0.001). Median length-of-stay after culture collection was numerically lower in the post-intervention group (26.0 [11.6–59.4] vs 19.7 [12.9–37.8] days; p = 0.33). Controlling for ICU admission, our intervention was not associated with decreased 30-day inpatient mortality (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.45–5.79). Conclusion Our study identified an improvement in TAP in MDR PsA infections with implementation of diagnostic and AMS initiatives. In an adequately powered study, our intervention could potentially impact patient survival through timely initiation of effective therapy with novel BL/BLIs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Adverse clinical outcomes associated with RAAS inhibitor discontinuation: analysis of over 400 000 patients from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby J L Humphrey ◽  
Glen James ◽  
Eric T Wittbrodt ◽  
Donna Zarzuela ◽  
Thomas F Hiemstra
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Ckd Stage ◽  
First Occurrence ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Users of guideline-recommended renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors may experience disruptions to their treatment, e.g. due to hyperkalaemia, hypotension or acute kidney injury. The risks associated with treatment disruption have not been comprehensively assessed; therefore, we evaluated the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in RAAS inhibitor users experiencing treatment disruptions in a large population-wide database. Methods This exploratory, retrospective analysis utilized data from the UK’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to Hospital Episodes Statistics and the Office for National Statistics databases. Adults (≥18 years) with first RAAS inhibitor use (defined as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014 were eligible for inclusion. Time to the first occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes [all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, cardiac arrhythmia, heart failure hospitalization, cardiac arrest, advancement in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage and acute kidney injury] was compared between RAAS inhibitor users with and without interruptions or cessations to treatment during follow-up. Associations between baseline characteristics and adverse clinical outcomes were also assessed. Results Among 434 027 RAAS inhibitor users, the risk of the first occurrence of all clinical outcomes, except advancement in CKD stage, was 8–75% lower in patients without interruptions or cessations versus patients with interruptions/cessations. Baseline characteristics independently associated with increased risk of clinical outcomes included increasing age, smoking, CKD, diabetes and heart failure. Conclusions These findings highlight the need for effective management of factors associated with RAAS inhibitor interruptions or cessations in patients for whom guideline-recommended RAAS inhibitor treatment is indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document