scholarly journals Monotherapy versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination treatment for gram-negative bacteremia: a prospective, observational study.

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1127-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Leibovici ◽  
M Paul ◽  
O Poznanski ◽  
M Drucker ◽  
Z Samra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Combination Treatment ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Empirical Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Neutropenic Patients

The aim of the present study was to test whether the combination of a beta-lactam drug plus an aminoglycoside has advantage over monotherapy for severe gram-negative infections. Of 2,124 patients with gram-negative bacteremia surveyed prospectively, 670 were given inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment and the mortality rate in this group was 34%, whereas the mortality rate was 18% for 1,454 patients given appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (P = 0.0001). The mortality rates for patients given appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment were 17% for 789 patients given a single beta-lactam drug, 19% for 327 patients given combination treatment, 24% for 249 patients given a single aminoglycoside, and 29% for 89 patients given other antibiotics (P = 0.0001). When patients were stratified according to risk factors for mortality other than antibiotic treatment, combination therapy showed no advantage over treatment with a single beta-lactam drug except for neutropenic patients (odds ratio [OR] for mortality, 0.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.2 to 1.3) and patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.8). On multivariable logistic regression analysis including all risk factors for mortality, combination therapy had no advantage over therapy with a single beta-lactam drug. The mortality rate for patients treated with a single appropriate aminoglycoside was higher than that for patients given a beta-lactam drug in all strata except for patients with urinary tract infections. When the results of blood cultures were known, 1,878 patients were available for follow-up. Of these, 816 patients were given a single beta-lactam drug, 442 were given combination treatment, and 193 were given a single aminoglycoside. The mortality rates were 13, 15, and 23%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Both on stratified and on multivariable logistic regression analyses, combination treatment showed a benefit over treatment with a single beta-lactam drug only for neutropenic patients (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.7). In summary, combination treatment showed no advantage over treatment with an appropriate beta-lactam drug in nonneutropenic patients with gram-negative bacteremia.

scholarly journals Bloodstream Infections Caused by Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: Risk Factors for Mortality and Impact of Inappropriate Initial Antimicrobial Therapy on Outcome

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 760-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheol-In Kang ◽  
Sung-Han Kim ◽  
Wan Beom Park ◽  
Ki-Deok Lee ◽  
Hong-Bin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Initial Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Risk Source

ABSTRACT The marked increase in the incidence of infections due to antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacilli in recent years is of great concern, as patients infected by those isolates might initially receive antibiotics that are inactive against the responsible pathogens. To evaluate the effect of inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy on survival, a total of 286 patients with antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteremia, 61 patients with Escherichia coli bacteremia, 65 with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia, 74 with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, and 86 with Enterobacter bacteremia, were analyzed retrospectively. If a patient received at least one antimicrobial agent to which the causative microorganisms were susceptible within 24 h of blood culture collection, the initial antimicrobial therapy was considered to have been appropriate. High-risk sources of bacteremia were defined as the lung, peritoneum, or an unknown source. The main outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Of the 286 patients, 135 (47.2%) received appropriate initial empirical antimicrobial therapy, and the remaining 151 (52.8%) patients received inappropriate therapy. The adequately treated group had a 27.4% mortality rate, whereas the inadequately treated group had a 38.4% mortality rate (P = 0.049). Multivariate analysis showed that the significant independent risk factors of mortality were presentation with septic shock, a high-risk source of bacteremia, P. aeruginosa infection, and an increasing APACHE II score. In the subgroup of patients (n = 132) with a high-risk source of bacteremia, inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy was independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 11.72; P = 0.030). Our data suggest that inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy is associated with adverse outcome in antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteremia, particularly in patients with a high-risk source of bacteremia.

scholarly journals 1545. Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Neutropenic Patients: Risk Factors for Mortality in the Era of Multiresistance

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S480-S480
Author(s):  
Fabián Herrera ◽  
Ana Laborde ◽  
Rosana Jordán ◽  
Inés Roccia Rossi ◽  
Graciela Guerrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Neutropenic Patients

scholarly journals A Propensity Score Analysis Shows that Empirical Treatment with Linezolid Does Not Increase the Thirty-Day Mortality Rate in Patients with Gram-Negative Bacteremia

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 7025-7031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo-Guillermo Ternavasio-de la Vega ◽  
Ana-María Mateos-Díaz ◽  
Jose-Antonio Martinez ◽  
Manel Almela ◽  
Nazaret Cobos-Trigueros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Empirical Treatment ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Score Analysis ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia

ABSTRACTThe role of linezolid in empirical therapy of suspected bacteremia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of empirical use of linezolid or glycopeptides in addition to other antibiotics on the 30-day mortality rates in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia. For this purpose, 1,126 patients with Gram-negative bacteremia in the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 2000 to 2012 were included in this study. In order to compare the mortality rates between patients who received linezolid or glycopeptides, the propensity scores on baseline variables were used to balance the treatment groups, and both propensity score matching and propensity-adjusted logistic regression were used to compare the 30-day mortality rates between the groups. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 16.0% during the study period. Sixty-eight patients received empirical treatment with linezolid, and 1,058 received glycopeptides. The propensity score matching included 64 patients in each treatment group. After matching, the mortality rates were 14.1% (9/64) in patients who received glycopeptides and 21.9% (14/64) in those who received linezolid, and a nonsignificant association between empirical linezolid treatment and mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 3.82;P= 0.275, McNemar's test) was found. This association remained nonsignificant when variables that remained unbalanced after matching were included in a conditional logistic regression model. Further, the stratified propensity score analysis did not show any significant relationship between empirical linezolid treatment and the mortality rate after adjustment by propensity score quintiles or other variables potentially associated with mortality. In conclusion, the propensity score analysis showed that empirical treatment with linezolid compared with that with glycopeptides was not associated with 30-day mortality rates in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia.

Impact of empirical antibiotic regimens on mortality in neutropenic patients with bloodstream infection presenting with septic shock

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Chumbita ◽  
Pedro Puerta-Alcalde ◽  
Carlota Gudiol ◽  
Nicole Garcia-Pouton ◽  
Júlia Laporte-Amargós ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Neutropenic Patients ◽  
Prospective Cohorts ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: We analyzed risk factors for mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) presenting with septic shock and assessed the impact of empirical antibiotic regimens. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study (2010-2019) of two prospective cohorts comparing BSI episodes in patients with or without septic shock. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality in episodes with septic shock. Results: Of 1563 patients with BSI, 257 (16%) presented with septic shock. Those patients with septic shock had higher mortality than those without septic shock (55% vs 15%, p<0.001). Gram-negative bacilli caused 81% of episodes with septic shock; gram-positive cocci, 22%; and Candida species 5%. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) was administered in 17.5% of septic shock episodes. Empirical β-lactam combined with other active antibiotics was associated with the lowest mortality observed. When amikacin was the only active antibiotic, mortality was 90%. Addition of empirical specific gram-positive coverage had no impact on mortality. Mortality was higher when IEAT was administered (76% vs 51%, p=0.002). Age >70 years (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.7), IEAT for Candida spp. or gram-negative bacilli (OR 3.8, 1.3-11.1), acute kidney injury (OR 2.6, 1.4-4.9) and amikacin as the only active antibiotic (OR 15.2, 1.7-134.5) were independent risk factors for mortality, while combination of β-lactam and amikacin was protective (OR 0.32, 0.18-0.57). Conclusions: Septic shock in febrile neutropenic patients with BSI is associated with extremely high mortality, especially when IEAT is administered. Combination therapy including an active β-lactam and amikacin results in the best outcomes.

scholarly journals Risk factors for mortality and mortality rates in interstitial lung disease patients in the intensive care unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (150) ◽  
pp. 180061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio A. Huapaya ◽  
Erin M. Wilfong ◽  
Christopher T. Harden ◽  
Roy G. Brower ◽  
Sonye K. Danoff
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Population Heterogeneity

Data on interstitial lung disease (ILD) outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU) is of limited value due to population heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to examine risk factors for mortality and ILD mortality rates in the ICU.We performed a systematic review using five databases. 50 studies were identified and 34 were included: 17 studies on various aetiologies of ILD (mixed-ILD) and 17 on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In mixed-ILD, elevated APACHE score, hypoxaemia and mechanical ventilation are risk factors for mortality. No increased mortality was found with steroid use. Evidence is inconclusive on advanced age. In IPF, evidence is inconclusive for all factors except mechanical ventilation and hypoxaemia. The overall in-hospital mortality was available in 15 studies on mixed-ILD (62% in 2001–2009 and 48% in 2010–2017) and 15 studies on IPF (79% in 1993–2004 and 65% in 2005–2017). Follow-up mortality rate at 1 year ranged between 53% and 100%.Irrespective of ILD aetiology, mechanical ventilation is associated with increased mortality. For mixed-ILD, hypoxaemia and APACHE scores are also associated with increased mortality. IPF has the highest mortality rate among ILDs, but since 1993 the rate appears to be declining. Despite improving in-hospital survival, overall mortality remains high.

Microbiological pattern of prosthetic hip and knee infections: a high-volume, single-centre experience in China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Yu ◽  
Yiyi Kong ◽  
Jing Ye ◽  
Aiguo Wang ◽  
Wenteng Si
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Musculoskeletal Infection ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Empirical Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Link Type

Introduction. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after arthroplasty, which results in high morbidity, prolonged treatment and considerable healthcare expenses in the absence of accurate diagnosis. In China, microbiological data on PJIs are still scarce. Hypothesis/Gap Statement. The incidence of PJI is increasing year by year, and the proportion of drug-resistant bacteria infection is nicreasing, which brings severe challenges to the treatment of infection. Aim. This study aimed to identify the pathogens in PJIs, multi-drug resistance, and evaluate the effect of the treatment regimen in patients with PJI. Methodology. A total of 366 consecutive cases of PJI in the hip or knee joint were admitted at the Orthopedic Surgery Center in Zhengzhou, China from January 2012 to December 2018. Infections were confirmed in accordance with the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Concurrently, patient demographic data, incidence and antibiotic resistance were investigated. Statistical differences were analysed using Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test. Results. Altogether, 318 PJI cases satisfying the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study, including 148 with hip PJIs and 170 with knee PJIs. The average age of patients with hip PJIs was lesser than that of patients with knee PJIs (56.4 vs. 68.6 years). Meanwhile, coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CNS, n=81, 25.5 %) was the predominant causative pathogen, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n=67, 21.1 %). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) was identified in 28.9 % of PJI patients. In addition, fungus accounted for 4.8 % (n=15), non-tuberculosis mycobacterium accounted for 1.6 % (n=5), polymicrobial pathogens accounted for 21.7 % (n=69), and Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 7.9 % (n=25) of the total infections. The results of antibiotic susceptibility testing showed that gentamicin and clindamycin β-lactam antibiotics were poorly susceptible to Gram-positive isolates, but they were sensitive to rifampicin, linezolid and vancomycin. While antibiotics such as amikacin and imipenem were effective against Gram-negative bacteria, there was a high resistance rate of other pathogens to gentamicin, clindamycin and some quinolone antibacterial drugs. Empirical antibiotic treatment should combine vancomycin and cephalosporin, levofloxacin or clindamycin. When the pathogen is confirmed, the treatment should be individualized. Conclusions. The prevalence of culture-negative PJIs is still very high. Gram-positive bacteria are still the main type of pathogens that cause PJIs. Attention should be paid to the high incidence of MRS, such as MRSA and MR-CNS, among PJI patients. Empirical antibiotic treatment should cover Gram-positive isolates, especially Staphylococcus .

scholarly journals 116. Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Carbapenem Non-Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S89-S89
Author(s):  
Dong Hoon Shin ◽  
Kang Il Jun ◽  
Song Mi Moon ◽  
Wan Beom Park ◽  
Ji Hwan Bang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Resistant Organism ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Acute Myelogenous ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Abstract Background Early administration of susceptible antibiotics is crucial in Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB), especially in immunocompromised patients. We aimed to explore risk factors and clinical outcomes of carbapenem non-susceptible (Carba-NS) GNB in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Methods Cases of all GNB during induction or consolidation chemotherapy for AML in a 15-year period in a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Independent risk factors for Carba-NS GNB were sought and its clinical outcomes were compared with those of carbapenem susceptible (Carba-S) GNB. Results Among 485 GNB cases from 930 patients, 440 (91%) were Carba-S and 45 (9%) were Carba-NS GNB. Frequent Carba-NS isolates were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 23), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 11), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 10). Independent risk factors for Carba-NS GNB were carbapenem use at the onset of GNB (aOR [95% CI], 78.6 [24.4–252.8]; P < 0.001), the isolation of imipenem-resistant A. baumannii in the prior 1 year (aOR [95% CI], 14.6 [2.7–79.9]; P = 0.002), time interval from chemotherapy to GNB ≥20 days (aOR [95% CI], 4.7 [1.7–13.1]; P = 0.003), and length of hospital stay ≥30 days (aOR [95% CI], 3.4 [1.3–9.1]; P = 0.013). Except breakthrough GNBs which occurred during carbapenem treatment, the frequency of Carba-NS GNB was 48% (19/40) in cases having ≥2 risk factors other than carbapenem use. 30-day overall mortality (Carba-NS, 36% vs. Carba-S, 6%; P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (Carba-NS, 47% vs. Carba-S, 9%; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in Carba-NS GNB. Conclusion Carba-NS GNB in AML patients was independently associated with the use of carbapenem, the past isolation of resistant organism, and late onset of GNB, and its clinical outcomes were poorer than those of Carba-S GNB. Carba-NS organisms should be considered for antibiotic selection in AML patients having these risk factors. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Nosocomial Gram-Negative Bacteremia

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1641-1647 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gökhan GÖZEL ◽  
Ayşe ERBAY ◽  
Hürrem BODUR ◽  
Selim Sırrı EREN ◽  
Neriman BALABAN
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia

scholarly journals Emphysematous cystitis: mortality, risk factors, and pathogens of a rare disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Schicho ◽  
Christian Stroszczynski ◽  
Philipp Wiggermann
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Emphysematous Pyelonephritis ◽  
Emphysematous Cystitis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
High Degree

Although high mortality rates have been reported for emphysematous pyelonephritis (EP), information on emphysematous cystitis (EC), which is less common, is sparse. Here, we report one new case of severe EC and 136 cases of EC that occurred between 2007 and 2016, and review information about the characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and mortality of these patients, and the pathogens found in these patients. The mean age of the 136 patients was 67.9±14.2 years. Concurrent emphysematous infections of other organs were found in 21 patients (15.4%), with emphysematous pyelonephritis being the most common of these infections. The primary pathogen identified was <em>Escherichia coli</em> (54.4%). Patients were mainly treated by conservative management that included antibiotics (n=105; 77.2%). Ten of the 136 patients with EC died, yielding a mortality rate of 7.4%. Despite the relatively low mortality rate of EC compared with that of EP, a high degree of suspicion must be maintained to facilitate successful and conservative management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document