scholarly journals Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 Regulates the Single-Strand Annealing Mode of DNA Repair in Budding Yeast

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 6433-6445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Flott ◽  
Constance Alabert ◽  
Geraldine W. Toh ◽  
Rachel Toth ◽  
Neal Sugawara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Viability ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Annealing Mode

ABSTRACT Budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Slx4 is essential for cell viability in the absence of the Sgs1 helicase and for recovery from DNA damage. Here we report that cells lacking Slx4 have difficulties in completing DNA synthesis during recovery from replisome stalling induced by the DNA alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Although DNA synthesis restarts during recovery, cells are left with unreplicated gaps in the genome despite an increase in translesion synthesis. In this light, epistasis experiments show that SLX4 interacts with genes involved in error-free bypass of DNA lesions. Slx4 associates physically, in a mutually exclusive manner, with two structure-specific endonucleases, Rad1 and Slx1, but neither of these enzymes is required for Slx4 to promote resistance to MMS. However, Rad1-dependent DNA repair by single-strand annealing (SSA) requires Slx4. Strikingly, phosphorylation of Slx4 by the Mec1 and Tel1 kinases appears to be essential for SSA but not for cell viability in the absence of Sgs1 or for cellular resistance to MMS. These results indicate that Slx4 has multiple functions in responding to DNA damage and that a subset of these are regulated by Mec1/Tel1-dependent phosphorylation.

scholarly journals RecF and RecR Play Critical Roles in the Homologous Recombination and Single-Strand Annealing Pathways of Mycobacteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (19) ◽  
pp. 3121-3132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Gupta ◽  
Stewart Shuman ◽  
Michael S. Glickman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Central Position ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACTMycobacteria encode three DNA double-strand break repair pathways: (i) RecA-dependent homologous recombination (HR), (ii) Ku-dependent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and (iii) RecBCD-dependent single-strand annealing (SSA). Mycobacterial HR has two presynaptic pathway options that rely on the helicase-nuclease AdnAB and the strand annealing protein RecO, respectively. Ablation ofadnABorrecOindividually causes partial impairment of HR, but loss ofadnABandrecOin combination abolishes HR. RecO, which can accelerate annealing of single-stranded DNAin vitro, also participates in the SSA pathway. The functions of RecF and RecR, which, in other model bacteria, function in concert with RecO as mediators of RecA loading, have not been examined in mycobacteria. Here, we present a genetic analysis ofrecFandrecRin mycobacterial recombination. We find that RecF, like RecO, participates in the AdnAB-independent arm of the HR pathway and in SSA. In contrast, RecR is required for all HR in mycobacteria and for SSA. The essentiality of RecR as an agent of HR is yet another distinctive feature of mycobacterial DNA repair.IMPORTANCEThis study clarifies the molecular requirements for homologous recombination in mycobacteria. Specifically, we demonstrate that RecF and RecR play important roles in both the RecA-dependent homologous recombination and RecA-independent single-strand annealing pathways. Coupled with our previous findings (R. Gupta, M. Ryzhikov, O. Koroleva, M. Unciuleac, S. Shuman, S. Korolev, and M. S. Glickman, Nucleic Acids Res 41:2284–2295, 2013,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1298), these results revise our view of mycobacterial recombination and place the RecFOR system in a central position in homology-dependent DNA repair.

scholarly journals Strand asymmetry influences mismatch repair during single-strand annealing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria O. Pokusaeva ◽  
Aránzazu Rosado Diez ◽  
Lorena Espinar ◽  
Guillaume J. Filion
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Intrinsic Property ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACTBiases of DNA repair can shape the nucleotide landscape of genomes at evolutionary timescales. However, such biases have not yet been measured in chromatin for lack of technologies. Here we develop a genome-wide assay whereby the same DNA lesion is repaired in different chromatin contexts. We insert thousands of barcoded transposons carrying a reporter of DNA mismatch repair in the genome of mouse embryonic stem cells. Upon inducing a double-strand break between tandem repeats, a mismatch is generated when the single strand annealing repair pathway is used. Surprisingly, the mismatch repair machinery favors the same strand 60-80% of the time. The location of the lesion in the genome and the type of mismatch have little influence on the repair bias in this context. Using machine learning, we further show that both the repair bias and the efficiency of the repair are independent of known chromatin features. These results suggest that some intrinsic property of the lesion can have a large influence on the outcome of DNA repair, irrespective of the surrounding chromatin context.

scholarly journals Recent Perspectives in Radiation-Mediated DNA Damage and Repair: Role of NHEJ and Alternative Pathways

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Kumar Sharma ◽  
Priyanka Shaw ◽  
Aman Kalonia ◽  
M.H. Yashavarddhan ◽  
Pankaj Chaudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Alternative Nhej

Radiation is one of the causative agents for the induction of DNA damage in biological systems. There is various possibility of radiation exposure that might be natural, man-made, intentional, or non-intentional. Published literature indicates that radiation mediated cell death is primarily due to DNA damage that could be a single-strand break, double-strand breaks, base modification, DNA protein cross-links. The double-strand breaks are lethal damage due to the breakage of both strands of DNA. Mammalian cells are equipped with strong DNA repair pathways that cover all types of DNA damage. One of the predominant pathways that operate DNA repair is a non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) that has various integrated molecules that sense, detect, mediate, and repair the double-strand breaks. Even after a well-coordinated mechanism, there is a strong possibility of mutation due to the flexible nature in joining the DNA strands. There are alternatives to NHEJ pathways that can repair DNA damage. These pathways are alternative NHEJ pathways and single-strand annealing pathways that also displayed a role in DNA repair. These pathways are not studied extensively, and many reports are showing the relevance of these pathways in human diseases. The chapter will very briefly cover the radiation, DNA repair, and Alternative repair pathways in the mammalian system. The chapter will help the readers to understand the basic and applied knowledge of radiation mediated DNA damage and its repair in the context of extensively studied NHEJ pathways and unexplored alternative NHEJ pathways.

scholarly journals Single-Strand Annealing in Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 2167
Author(s):  
Janusz Blasiak
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Cancer Pathogenesis ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Strand Annealing

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most serious forms of DNA damage. In humans, DSBs are repaired mainly by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). Single-strand annealing (SSA), another DSB repair system, uses homologous repeats flanking a DSB to join DNA ends and is error-prone, as it removes DNA fragments between repeats along with one repeat. Many DNA deletions observed in cancer cells display homology at breakpoint junctions, suggesting the involvement of SSA. When multiple DSBs occur in different chromosomes, SSA may result in chromosomal translocations, essential in the pathogenesis of many cancers. Inhibition of RAD52 (RAD52 Homolog, DNA Repair Protein), the master regulator of SSA, results in decreased proliferation of BRCA1/2 (BRCA1/2 DNA Repair Associated)-deficient cells, occurring in many hereditary breast and ovarian cancer cases. Therefore, RAD52 may be targeted in synthetic lethality in cancer. SSA may modulate the response to platinum-based anticancer drugs and radiation. SSA may increase the efficacy of the CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)/Cas9 (CRISPR associated 9) genome editing and reduce its off-target effect. Several basic problems associated with SSA, including its evolutionary role, interplay with HRR and NHEJ and should be addressed to better understand its role in cancer pathogenesis and therapy.

BCR-ABL Induces Error-Prone Single Strand Annealing in Transformed Cells.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2937-2937
Author(s):  
Margret S. Rodrigues ◽  
Jeffrey R. Gonneville ◽  
Klaus Podar ◽  
David M. Weinstock ◽  
James D. Griffin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stromal Cell ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Transformed Cells ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

Abstract Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a hematopoietic stem cell disorder, caused by the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase oncogene. BCR-ABL kinase activity is required for all aspects of transformation, including abnormal proliferation and neoplastic expansion of stem cells, activation of signaling pathways and genomic instability. We have recently shown that BCR-ABL kinase activity also causes elevated intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). These chronically elevated ROS levels have been implicated in the induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and therapy-related drug resistance, mainly through low- fidelity homology-directed repair (HDR) of DNA lesions. We have utilized GFP-based reporters in BCR-ABL transformed cells to measure both HDR and single-strand annealing (SSA), a mutagenic pathway of homologous repair between repetitive sequences. Repair rates of a single DSB by each of these pathways was measured in BCR-ABL expressing BaF3 cells (BaF3.p210), which have previously been shown to be an excellent system to model the induction of imatinib resistant mutations. We found that inhibition of BCR-ABL kinase activity by imatinib decreased the frequency of SSA by 73 ± 2% (n=3) and increased the frequency of HDR by 70 ± 11% (n=3) in BaF3.p210, compared to untreated cells. Treatment with imatinib did not affect HDR or SSA in BaF3 cells that do not express BCR-ABL. We also determined the fidelity of both SSA and HDR in our model system using clonal populations that stably express the repaired GFP+ reporters (n=20). As expected, sequencing of GFP+ repair products from cells containing the SSA reporter confirmed the expected sequence deletions, consistent with an error-prone mechanism. In contrast, sequencing of GFP+ repair products from the HDR reporter indicated a high-fidelity repair mechanism, without any mutations. It should be noted that this reporter assay does not account for potentially imprecise HDR, leading to a non-functional GFP. Nevertheless, point mutations at the previously reported rate were not detected. Thus, altered HDR fidelity may not be a universal mechanism for the induction of point mutations by BCR-ABL. Our data suggests a unique and alternative pathway, whereby BCR-ABL alters the balance between the SSA and HDR pathways. Moreover, in the presence of interleukin-3 at a concentration that supports not only viability but also cell growth (1ng/ml), imatinib was ineffective at protecting cells from error-prone SSA. In vivo, stromal cells may provide these additional growth signals. Our in vitro data show that stromal cell conditioned medium is not only sufficient to support growth and viability of CML cell lines in the presence of imatinib, but it can also lead to elevated levels of ROS. An abnormal increase in ROS is sufficient by itself to cause genomic mutations (transitions and/or transversions) as a result of single strand oxidative DNA lesions, even in the absence of altered DSB or single strand lesion repair mechanisms. Thus, therapy-related resistance and additional genomic abnormalities may not only be a result of BCR-ABL dependent ROS induction but may also occur within the stromal cell microenvironment through ROS induction by growth factors.

Long-term efficacy of a new medical device containing Fernblock® and DNA repair enzyme complex in the treatment and prevention of cancerization field in patients with actinic keratosis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 80-89
Author(s):  
Blanca De Unamuno Bustos ◽  
Natalia Chaparr´´o Aguilera ◽  
Inmaculada Azorín García ◽  
Anaid Calle Andrino ◽  
Margarita Llavador Ros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Medical Device ◽  
Actinic Keratosis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Enzyme Complex ◽  
Repair Enzyme ◽  
P53 Expression ◽  
Cancerization Field

Actinic keratosis (AKs) are part of the cancerization field, a region adjacent to AKs containing subclinical and histologically abnormal epidermal tissue due to Ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage. The photoproducts as consequence of DNA damage induced by UV are mainly cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). Fernblock® demonstrated in previous studies significant reduction of the number of CPDs induced by UV radiation. Photolyases are a specific group of enzymes that remove the major UV-induced DNA lesions by a mechanism called photo-reactivation. A monocentric, prospective, controlled, and double blind interventional study was performed to evaluate the effect of a new medical device (NMD) containing a DNA-repair enzyme complex (photolyases, endonucleases and glycosilases), a combination of UV-filters, and Fernblock® in the treatment of the cancerization field in 30 AK patients after photodynamic therapy. Patients were randomized into two groups: patients receiving a standard sunscreen (SS) andpatients receiving the NMD. Clinical, dermoscopic, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and histological evaluations were performed. An increase of AKs was noted in all groups after three months of PDT without significant differences between them (p=0.476). A significant increase in the number of AKs was observed in SS group after six (p=0.026) and twelve months of PDT (p=0.038); however, this increase did not reach statistical significance in the NMD group. Regarding RCM evaluation, honeycomb pattern assessment after twelve months of PDT showed significant differences in the extension and grade of the atypia in the NMD group compared to SS group (p=0.030 and p=0.026, respectively). Concerning histopathological evaluation, keratinocyte atypia grade improved from baseline to six months after PDT in all the groups, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Twelve months after PDT, p53 expression was significantly lower in the NMD group compared to SS group (p=0.028). The product was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. Our results provide evidence of the utility of this NMD in the improvement of the cancerization field and in the prevention of the development of new AKs.  

scholarly journals Platinum Complexes in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2073
Author(s):  
Beate Köberle ◽  
Sarah Schoch
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cisplatin Resistance ◽  
Platinum Complexes ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
P53 Inactivation

Cisplatin is one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of various solid neoplasms, including testicular, lung, ovarian, head and neck, and bladder cancers. Unfortunately, the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin against colorectal cancer is poor. Various mechanisms appear to contribute to cisplatin resistance in cancer cells, including reduced drug accumulation, enhanced drug detoxification, modulation of DNA repair mechanisms, and finally alterations in cisplatin DNA damage signaling preventing apoptosis in cancer cells. Regarding colorectal cancer, defects in mismatch repair and altered p53-mediated DNA damage signaling are the main factors controlling the resistance phenotype. In particular, p53 inactivation appears to be associated with chemoresistance and poor prognosis. To overcome resistance in cancers, several strategies can be envisaged. Improved cisplatin analogues, which retain activity in resistant cancer, might be applied. Targeting p53-mediated DNA damage signaling provides another therapeutic strategy to circumvent cisplatin resistance. This review provides an overview on the DNA repair pathways involved in the processing of cisplatin damage and will describe signal transduction from cisplatin DNA lesions, with special attention given to colorectal cancer cells. Furthermore, examples for improved platinum compounds and biochemical modulators of cisplatin DNA damage signaling will be presented in the context of colon cancer therapy.

scholarly journals The Interactions of DNA Repair, Telomere Homeostasis, and p53 Mutational Status in Solid Cancers: Risk, Prognosis, and Prediction

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 479
Author(s):  
Pavel Vodicka ◽  
Ladislav Andera ◽  
Alena Opattova ◽  
Ludmila Vodickova
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Genomic Integrity ◽  
Repair Capacity ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Telomere Homeostasis

The disruption of genomic integrity due to the accumulation of various kinds of DNA damage, deficient DNA repair capacity, and telomere shortening constitute the hallmarks of malignant diseases. DNA damage response (DDR) is a signaling network to process DNA damage with importance for both cancer development and chemotherapy outcome. DDR represents the complex events that detect DNA lesions and activate signaling networks (cell cycle checkpoint induction, DNA repair, and induction of cell death). TP53, the guardian of the genome, governs the cell response, resulting in cell cycle arrest, DNA damage repair, apoptosis, and senescence. The mutational status of TP53 has an impact on DDR, and somatic mutations in this gene represent one of the critical events in human carcinogenesis. Telomere dysfunction in cells that lack p53-mediated surveillance of genomic integrity along with the involvement of DNA repair in telomeric DNA regions leads to genomic instability. While the role of individual players (DDR, telomere homeostasis, and TP53) in human cancers has attracted attention for some time, there is insufficient understanding of the interactions between these pathways. Since solid cancer is a complex and multifactorial disease with considerable inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity, we mainly dedicated this review to the interactions of DNA repair, telomere homeostasis, and TP53 mutational status, in relation to (a) cancer risk, (b) cancer progression, and (c) cancer therapy.

scholarly journals The Yeast Recombinational Repair Protein Rad59 Interacts With Rad52 and Stimulates Single-Strand Annealing

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison P Davis ◽  
Lorraine S Symington
Keyword(s):  
Protein A ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Stranded Dna ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Recombination Pathway

Abstract The yeast RAD52 gene is essential for homology-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks. In vitro, Rad52 binds to single- and double-stranded DNA and promotes annealing of complementary single-stranded DNA. Genetic studies indicate that the Rad52 and Rad59 proteins act in the same recombination pathway either as a complex or through overlapping functions. Here we demonstrate physical interaction between Rad52 and Rad59 using the yeast two-hybrid system and co-immunoprecipitation from yeast extracts. Purified Rad59 efficiently anneals complementary oligonucleotides and is able to overcome the inhibition to annealing imposed by replication protein A (RPA). Although Rad59 has strand-annealing activity by itself in vitro, this activity is insufficient to promote strand annealing in vivo in the absence of Rad52. The rfa1-D288Y allele partially suppresses the in vivo strand-annealing defect of rad52 mutants, but this is independent of RAD59. These results suggest that in vivo Rad59 is unable to compete with RPA for single-stranded DNA and therefore is unable to promote single-strand annealing. Instead, Rad59 appears to augment the activity of Rad52 in strand annealing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document