scholarly journals SBP2 Binding Affinity Is a Major Determinant in Differential Selenoprotein mRNA Translation and Sensitivity to Nonsense-Mediated Decay

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 7848-7855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Squires ◽  
Ilko Stoytchev ◽  
Erin P. Forry ◽  
Marla J. Berry
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Major Determinant ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Nonsense Mediated Decay ◽  
Potential Factors ◽  
Mechanistic Basis ◽  
Selenoprotein Mrnas

ABSTRACT Selenoprotein mRNAs are potential targets for degradation via nonsense-mediated decay due to the presence of in-frame UGA codons that can be decoded as either selenocysteine or termination codons. When UGA decoding is inefficient, as occurs when selenium is limiting, termination occurs at these positions. Based on the predicted exon-intron structure, 14 of the 25 human selenoprotein mRNAs are predicted to be sensitive to nonsense-mediated decay. Among these, sensitivity varies widely, resulting in a hierarchy of preservation or degradation of selenoprotein mRNAs and, thus, of selenoprotein synthesis. Potential factors in dictating the hierarchy of selenoprotein synthesis are the Sec insertion sequence RNA-binding proteins, SBP2 and nucleolin. To investigate the mechanistic basis for this hierarchy and the role of these two proteins, we carried out knockdowns of SBP2 expression and assessed the effects on selenoprotein mRNA levels. We also investigated in vivo binding of selenoprotein mRNAs by SBP2 and nucleolin via immunoprecipitation of the proteins and quantitation of bound mRNAs. We report that SBP2 exhibits strong preferential binding to some selenoprotein mRNAs over others, whereas nucleolin exhibits minimal differences in binding. Thus, SBP2 is a major determinant in dictating the hierarchy of selenoprotein synthesis via differential selenoprotein mRNA translation and sensitivity to nonsense-mediated decay.

scholarly journals Depletion of the Trypanosome Pumilio Domain Protein PUF2 or of Some Other Essential Proteins Causes Transcriptome Changes Related to Coding Region Length

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 664-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhaskar Anand Jha ◽  
Abeer Fadda ◽  
Clementine Merce ◽  
Elisha Mugo ◽  
Dorothea Droll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Open Reading Frames ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Coding Region ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Puf Proteins ◽  
Reading Frames

ABSTRACT Pumilio domain RNA-binding proteins are known mainly as posttranscriptional repressors of gene expression that reduce mRNA translation and stability. Trypanosoma brucei has 11 PUF proteins. We show here that PUF2 is in the cytosol, with roughly the same number of molecules per cell as there are mRNAs. Although PUF2 exhibits a low level of in vivo RNA binding, it is not associated with polysomes. PUF2 also decreased reporter mRNA levels in a tethering assay, consistent with a repressive role. Depletion of PUF2 inhibited growth of bloodstream-form trypanosomes, causing selective loss of mRNAs with long open reading frames and increases in mRNAs with shorter open reading frames. Reexamination of published RNASeq data revealed the same trend in cells depleted of some other proteins. We speculate that these length effects could be caused by inhibition of the elongation phase of transcription or by an influence of translation status or polysomal conformation on mRNA decay.

scholarly journals Control of noncoding RNA production and histone levels by a 5′ tRNA fragment

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Boskovic ◽  
Xin Yang Bing ◽  
Ebru Kaymak ◽  
Oliver J Rando
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Noncoding Rnas ◽  
Cajal Body ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Histone 3 ◽  
Rna Biogenesis ◽  
Mechanistic Basis

Small RNAs derived from mature tRNAs, referred to as tRNA fragments or "tRFs", are an emerging class of regulatory RNAs with poorly understood functions in cellular regulation. We recently identified a role for one specific tRF - 5′ tRF-Gly-GCC, or tRF-GG - in repression of genes associated with the endogenous retroelement MERVL, but the mechanistic basis for this regulation was unknown. Here, we show that tRF-GG plays a role in production of a wide variety of noncoding RNAs normally synthesized in Cajal bodies. Among these noncoding RNAs, tRF-GG regulation of the U7 snRNA modulates heterochromatin-mediated transcriptional repression of MERVL elements by supporting an adequate supply of histone proteins. Importantly, the effects of inhibiting tRF-GG on histone mRNA levels, activity of a histone 3′ UTR reporter, and ultimately on MERVL regulation could all be suppressed by the U7 RNA. We show that the related RNA-binding proteins hnRNPF and H bind directly to tRF-GG, and are required for Cajal body biogenesis. Together, our data reveal a conserved mechanism for 5′ tRNA fragment control of noncoding RNA biogenesis and, consequently, in global chromatin organization.

scholarly journals The G4 resolvase RHAU modulates mRNA translation and stability to sustain postnatal heart function and regeneration

2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.014948
Author(s):  
Mingyang Jiang ◽  
Han Hu ◽  
Ke Zhao ◽  
Ruomin Di ◽  
Xinyi Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Development ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Heart Function ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Post Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Heart Physiology

Post-transcriptional regulation of mRNA translation and stability is primarily achieved by RNA binding proteins (RBPs), which is of increasing importance for heart function. Furthermore, G-quadruplex (G4) and G4 resolvase activity are involved in a variety of biological processes. However, the role of G4 resolvase activity in heart function remains unknown. The present study aims to investigate the role of RHAU, an RBP with G4 resolvase activity in postnatal heart function through deletion of Rhau in the cardiomyocytes of postnatal mice. RHAU-deficient mice displayed progressive pathological remodeling leading to heart failure and mortality, and impaired neonatal heart regeneration. RHAU ablation reduced the protein levels but enhanced mRNA levels of Yap1 and Hexim1 that are important regulators for heart development and postnatal heart function. Furthermore, RHAU was found to associate with both the 5’- and 3’- UTRs of these genes to destabilize mRNA but to enhance translation. Thus, we have demonstrated the important functions of RHAU in the dual regulation of mRNA translation and stability, which is vital for heart physiology.

scholarly journals Dual-function RNA-binding proteins influence mRNA abundance and translational efficiency of distinct sets of target genes.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Schneider-Lunitz ◽  
Jorge Ruiz-Orera ◽  
Norbert Hubner ◽  
Sebastiaan van Heesch
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Dual Function ◽  
Translational Efficiency ◽  
Splicing Factors ◽  
Mrna Levels

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key regulators of RNA metabolism. Many RBPs possess uncharacterized RNA-binding domains and localize to multiple subcellular compartments, suggesting their involvement in multiple biological processes. We searched for such multifunctionality within a set of 143 RBPs by integrating experimentally validated target genes with the transcriptomes and translatomes of 80 human hearts. This revealed that RBP abundance is predictive of the extent of target regulation in vivo, leading us to newly associate 27 RBPs with translational control. Amongst those were several splicing factors, of which the muscle specific RBM20 modulated target translation rates through switches in isoform production. For 21 RBPs, we newly observed dual regulatory effects impacting both mRNA levels and translation rates, albeit for virtually independent sets of target genes. We highlight a subset, including G3BP1, PUM1, UCHL5, and DDX3X, where dual regulation is achieved by differential affinity for targets of distinct length and functionality. Strikingly, in a manner very similar to DDX3X, the known splicing factors EFTUD2 and PRPF8 selectively influence target translation rates depending on 5' UTR structure. Our results indicate unanticipated complexity of protein-RNA interactions at consecutive stages of gene expression and implicate multiple core splicing factors as key regulators of translational output.

scholarly journals RNA-binding proteins La and HuR cooperatively modulate translation repression of PDCD4 mRNA

2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.014894
Author(s):  
Ravi Kumar ◽  
Dipak Kumar Poria ◽  
Partho Sarothi Ray
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Chronic Inflammation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Suppressor Gene ◽  
Cooperative Action ◽  
Translation Repression

Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression plays a critical role in controlling the inflammatory response. An uncontrolled inflammatory response results in chronic inflammation, often leading to tumorigenesis. Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) is a pro-inflammatory tumor-suppressor gene which helps to prevent the transition from chronic inflammation to cancer. PDCD4 mRNA translation is regulated by an interplay between the oncogenic microRNA miR-21 and the RNA-binding protein (RBP) HuR in response to LPS stimulation, but the role of other regulatory factors remain unknown. Here we report that the RBP Lupus antigen (La) interacts with the 3’UTR of PDCD4 mRNA and prevents miR-21-mediated translation repression. While LPS causes nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation of HuR, it enhances cellular La expression. Remarkably, La and HuR were found to bind cooperatively to the PDCD4 mRNA and mitigate miR-21-mediated translation repression. The cooperative action of La and HuR reduced cell proliferation and enhanced apoptosis, reversing the pro-oncogenic function of miR-21. Together, these observations demonstrate a cooperative interplay between two RBPs, triggered differentially by the same stimulus, which exerts a synergistic effect on PDCD4 expression and thereby helps maintain a balance between inflammation and tumorigenesis.

scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

scholarly journals RNA-Centric Approaches to Profile the RNA–Protein Interaction Landscape on Selected RNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Technological Advances

RNA–protein interactions frame post-transcriptional regulatory networks and modulate transcription and epigenetics. While the technological advances in RNA sequencing have significantly expanded the repertoire of RNAs, recently developed biochemical approaches combined with sensitive mass-spectrometry have revealed hundreds of previously unrecognized and potentially novel RNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, a major challenge remains to understand how the thousands of RNA molecules and their interacting proteins assemble and control the fate of each individual RNA in a cell. Here, I review recent methodological advances to approach this problem through systematic identification of proteins that interact with particular RNAs in living cells. Thereby, a specific focus is given to in vivo approaches that involve crosslinking of RNA–protein interactions through ultraviolet irradiation or treatment of cells with chemicals, followed by capture of the RNA under study with antisense-oligonucleotides and identification of bound proteins with mass-spectrometry. Several recent studies defining interactomes of long non-coding RNAs, viral RNAs, as well as mRNAs are highlighted, and short reference is given to recent in-cell protein labeling techniques. These recent experimental improvements could open the door for broader applications and to study the remodeling of RNA–protein complexes upon different environmental cues and in disease.

scholarly journals Architecture of RNA influences plant biology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaying Zhu ◽  
Changhao Li ◽  
Xu Peng ◽  
Xiuren Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mirna Biogenesis ◽  
Plant Responses ◽  
Tertiary Structures ◽  
Rna Transcripts ◽  
Environmental Variations ◽  
Living Organisms ◽  
Processing Stability

Abstract The majority of the genome is transcribed to RNA in living organisms. RNA transcripts can form astonishing arrays of secondary and tertiary structures via Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or wobble base pairing. In vivo, RNA folding is not a simple thermodynamics event of minimizing free energy. Instead, the process is constrained by transcription, RNA binding proteins (RBPs), steric factors and micro-environment. RNA secondary structure (RSS) plays myriad roles in numerous biological processes, such as RNA processing, stability, transportation and translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Emerging evidence has also implicated RSS in RNA trafficking, liquid-liquid phase separation and plant responses to environmental variations such as temperature and salinity. At the molecular level, RSS is correlated with regulating splicing, polyadenylation, protein systhsis, and miRNA biogenesis and functions. In this review, we summarized newly reported methods for probing RSS in vivo and functions and mechanisms of RSS in plant physiology.

scholarly journals Targeting Poison Exons to Treat Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Miriam C. Aziz ◽  
Patricia N. Schneider ◽  
Gemma L. Carvill
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Splicing ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Epileptic Encephalopathy ◽  
Nonsense Mediated Decay ◽  
Subsequent Degradation ◽  
Alternative Splicing Events ◽  
Genetic Epilepsies

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) describe a subset of neurodevelopmental disorders categorized by refractory epilepsy that is often associated with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. The majority of DEEs are now known to have a genetic basis with de novo coding variants accounting for the majority of cases. More recently, a small number of individuals have been identified with intronic <i>SCN1A</i> variants that result in alternative splicing events that lead to ectopic inclusion of poison exons (PEs). PEs are short highly conserved exons that contain a premature truncation codon, and when spliced into the transcript, lead to premature truncation and subsequent degradation by nonsense-mediated decay. The reason for the inclusion/exclusion of these PEs is not entirely clear, but research suggests an autoregulatory role in gene expression and protein abundance. This is seen in proteins such as RNA-binding proteins and serine/arginine-rich proteins. Recent studies have focused on targeting these PEs as a method for therapeutic intervention. Targeting PEs using antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) has shown to be effective in modulating alternative splicing events by decreasing the amount of transcripts harboring PEs, thus increasing the abundance of full-length transcripts and thereby the amount of protein in haploinsufficient genes implicated in DEE. In the age of personalized medicine, cellular and animal models of the genetic epilepsies have become essential in developing and testing novel precision therapeutics, including PE-targeting ASOs in a subset of DEEs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document