scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae G1 cyclins differ in their intrinsic functional specificities.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 6794-6803 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Levine ◽  
K Huang ◽  
F R Cross
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Substrate Specificity ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
Quantitative Model ◽  
Protein Abundance ◽  
Triple Mutant ◽  
Functional Assays ◽  
Functional Differences

The three budding yeast CLN genes appear to be functionally redundant for cell cycle Start: any single CLN gene is sufficient to promote Start, while the cln1 cln2 cln3 triple mutant is Start defective and inviable. Both quantitative and apparently qualitative differences between CLN genes have been reported, but available data do not in general allow distinction between qualitative functional differences as opposed to simply quantitative differences in expression or function. To determine if there are intrinsic qualitative differences between Cln proteins, we compared CLN2, CLN3, and crippled (but still partially active) CLN2 genes in a range of assays that differentiate genetically between CLN2 and CLN3. The results suggest that different potencies of Cln2, Cln3, and Cln2 mutants in functional assays cannot be accounted for by a simple quantitative model for their action, since Cln3 is at least as active as Cln2 and much more active than the Cln2 mutants in driving Swi4/Swi6 cell cycle box (SCB)-regulated transcription and cell cycle initiation in cln1 cln2 cln3 bck2 strains, but Cln3 has little or no activity in other assays in which Cln2 and the Cln2 mutants function. Differences in Cln protein abundance are unlikely to account for these results. Cln3-associated kinase is therefore likely to have an intrinsic in vivo substrate specificity distinct from that of Cln2-associated kinase, despite their functional redundancy. Consistent with the idea that Cln3 may be the primary transcriptional activator of CLN1, CLN2, and other genes, the activation of CLN2 transcription was found to be sensitive to the gene dosage of CLN3 but not to the gene dosage of CLN2.

scholarly journals Mammalian Orc1 Protein Is Selectively Released from Chromatin and Ubiquitinated during the S-to-M Transition in the Cell Division Cycle

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong-Jun Li ◽  
Melvin L. DePamphilis
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Half Life ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
26S Proteasome ◽  
Selective Dissociation

ABSTRACT Previous studies have shown that changes in the affinity of the hamster Orc1 protein for chromatin during the M-to-G1 transition correlate with the activity of hamster origin recognition complexes (ORCs) and the appearance of prereplication complexes at specific sites. Here we show that Orc1 is selectively released from chromatin as cells enter S phase, converted into a mono- or diubiquitinated form, and then deubiquitinated and re-bound to chromatin during the M-to-G1 transition. Orc1 is degraded by the 26S proteasome only when released into the cytosol, and peptide additions to Orc1 make it hypersensitive to polyubiquitination. In contrast, Orc2 remains tightly bound to chromatin throughout the cell cycle and is not a substrate for ubiquitination. Since the concentration of Orc1 remains constant throughout the cell cycle, and its half-life in vivo is the same as that of Orc2, ubiquitination of non-chromatin-bound Orc1 presumably facilitates the inactivation of ORCs by sequestering Orc1 during S phase. Thus, in contrast to yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe), mammalian ORC activity appears to be regulated during each cell cycle through selective dissociation and reassociation of Orc1 from chromatin-bound ORCs.

scholarly journals Hematopoietic Stem Cells Have an Intrinsic Expansion Limit

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4749-4749
Author(s):  
Shanti Rojas-Sutterlin ◽  
André Haman ◽  
Trang Hoang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cell Functions ◽  
Cell Pool ◽  
Stem Cell Pool

Abstract Abstract 4749 Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is the first successful cellular therapy and remains the only treatment providing long-term cure in acute myeloblastic leukemia. At the apex of the hematopoietic system, quiescent HSCs are spared by chemotherapeutic treatments that target proliferating cells and therefore can regenerate the entire blood system of a patient after drug exposure. Nevertheless, the consequence of repeated chemotherapy regimen on HSC function remains to be clarified. We previously showed that Scl/Tal1 gene dosage regulates HSC quiescence and functions when transplanted at limiting dilutions (Lacombe et al., 2010). In the present study, we investigate how massive expansion in vivo influences stem cell functions. To address this question, we optimized a protocol based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an antimetabolite that has been used to treat colon, rectum, and head and neck cancers. In addition, we used Scl+/− mice to address the role of Scl in controlling HSCs expansion post-5-FU. We show that within 7 days following 5-FU treatment, HSCs exit quiescence and enter the cell cycle. To deplete cycling HSCs, we injected a second dose of 5-FU and showed that the stem cell pool was disseminated. Nonetheless, the remaining HSCs proliferated extensively to re-establish the HSC pool, which was twice larger than that of untreated mice. At this point, most HSCs have exited the cell cycle and were back to quiescence. Despite a near normal stem cell pool size and a quiescent status, HSCs from these 5-FU treated mice could not compete against untreated cells to regenerate the host in transplantation assays. Furthermore, we show that this extensive proliferation in vivo severely impaired the clonal expansion of individual HSC as measured by the mean activity of stem cell (MAS). Our results demonstrate that HSCs lose their competitive potential after two 5-FU treatments, suggesting that HSCs have an intrinsic expansion limit beyond which their regenerative potential is impaired. In addition, Scl is haplodeficient for cell cycle entry and cell division but Scl gene dosage does not affect this expansion limit. Therefore, our data dissociate the control of HSC expansion under extensive proliferative stress from cell cycle control during steady state. We surmise that chemotherapy regimen based on repeated administration of 5-FU or other antimetabolites are likely to severely impair long-term stem cell functions. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Functional Complementation of Human Centromere Protein A (CENP-A) by Cse4p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (15) ◽  
pp. 6620-6630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Wieland ◽  
Sandra Orthaus ◽  
Sabine Ohndorf ◽  
Stephan Diekmann ◽  
Peter Hemmerich
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Centromere Protein ◽  
Centromere Protein A

ABSTRACT We have employed a novel in vivo approach to study the structure and function of the eukaryotic kinetochore multiprotein complex. RNA interference (RNAi) was used to block the synthesis of centromere protein A (CENP-A) and Clip-170 in human cells. By coexpression, homologous kinetochore proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were then tested for the ability to complement the RNAi-induced phenotypes. Cse4p, the budding yeast CENP-A homolog, was specifically incorporated into kinetochore nucleosomes and was able to complement RNAi-induced cell cycle arrest in CENP-A-depleted human cells. Thus, Cse4p can structurally and functionally substitute for CENP-A, strongly suggesting that the basic features of centromeric chromatin are conserved between yeast and mammals. Bik1p, the budding yeast homolog of human CLIP-170, also specifically localized to kinetochores during mitosis, but Bik1p did not rescue CLIP-170 depletion-induced cell cycle arrest. Generally, the newly developed in vivo complementation assay provides a powerful new tool for studying the function and evolutionary conservation of multiprotein complexes from yeast to humans.

scholarly journals A RAD9-dependent cell cycle arrest in response to unresolved recombination intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hardeep Kaur ◽  
GN Krishnaprasad ◽  
Michael Lichten
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Associated Lesions

AbstractIn Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the conserved Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 helicase-decatenase regulates homologous recombination by limiting accumulation of recombination intermediates that are precursors of crossovers. In vitro studies have suggested that the dissolution of double-Holliday junction joint molecules by Sgs1-driven convergent junction migration and Top3-Rmi1 mediated strand decatenation could be responsible for this. To ask if dissolution occurs in vivo, we conditionally depleted Sgs1 and/or Rmi1 during return to growth, a procedure where recombination intermediates formed during meiosis are resolved when cells resume the mitotic cell cycle. Sgs1 depletion during return to growth delayed joint molecule resolution, but ultimately most were resolved and cells divided normally. In contrast, Rmi1 depletion resulted in delayed and incomplete joint molecule resolution, and most cells did not divide. rad9Δ mutation restored cell division in Rmi1-depleted cells, indicating that the DNA damage checkpoint caused this cell cycle arrest. Restored cell division in rad9Δ, Rmi1-depleted cells frequently produced anucleate cells, consistent with the suggestion that persistent recombination intermediates prevented chromosome segregation. Our findings indicate that Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 acts in vivo, as it does in vitro, to promote recombination intermediate resolution by dissolution. They also indicate that, in the absence of Top3-Rmi1 activity, unresolved recombination intermediates persist and activate the DNA damage response, which is usually thought to be activated by much earlier DNA damage-associated lesions.

scholarly journals Forkhead Genes in Transcriptional Silencing, Cell Morphology and the Cell Cycle: Overlapping and Distinct Functions for FKH1 and FKH2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 1533-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C Hollenhorst ◽  
Melissa E Bose ◽  
Melissa R Mielke ◽  
Ulrika Müller ◽  
Catherine A Fox
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Morphology ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Pseudohyphal Growth ◽  
Binding Domains

Abstract The SIR1 gene is one of four specialized genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae required for repressing transcription at the silent mating-type cassettes, HMLα and HMRa, by a mechanism known as silencing. Silencing requires the assembly of a specialized chromatin structure analogous to heterochromatin. FKH1 was isolated as a gene that, when expressed in multiple copies, could substitute for the function of SIR1 in silencing HMRa. FKH1 (Forkhead Homologue One) was named for its homology to the forkhead family of eukaryotic transcription factors classified on the basis of a conserved DNA binding domain. Deletion of FKH1 caused a defect in silencing HMRa, indicating that FKH1 has a positive role in silencing. Significantly, deletion of both FKH1 and its closest homologue in yeast, FKH2, caused a form of yeast pseudohyphal growth, indicating that the two genes have redundant functions in controlling yeast cell morphology. By several criteria, fkh1Δ fkh2Δ-induced pseudohyphal growth was distinct from the nutritionally induced form of pseudohyphal growth observed in some strains of S. cerevisiae. Although FKH2 is redundant with FKH1 in controlling pseudohyphal growth, the two genes have different functions in silencing HMRa. High-copy expression of CLB2, a G2/M-phase cyclin, prevented fkh1Δ fkh2Δ-induced pseudohyphal growth and modulated some of the fkhΔ-induced silencing phenotypes. Interestingly, deletions in either FKH1 or FKH2 alone caused subtle but opposite effects on cell-cycle progression and CLB2 mRNA expression, consistent with a role for each of these genes in modulating the cell cycle and having opposing effects on silencing. The differences between Fkh1p and Fkh2p in vivo were not attributable to differences in their DNA binding domains.

scholarly journals Overlapping Specificities of Base Excision Repair, Nucleotide Excision Repair, Recombination, and Translesion Synthesis Pathways for DNA Base Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 2929-2935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Swanson ◽  
Natalie J. Morey ◽  
Paul W. Doetsch ◽  
Sue Jinks-Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Triple Mutant ◽  
Nucleotide Excision ◽  
Lyase Activity ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Ap Lyase

ABSTRACT The removal of oxidative damage from Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA is thought to be conducted primarily through the base excision repair pathway. The Escherichia coliendonuclease III homologs Ntg1p and Ntg2p are S. cerevisiae N-glycosylase-associated apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyases that recognize a wide variety of damaged pyrimidines (H. J. You, R. L. Swanson, and P. W. Doetsch, Biochemistry 37:6033–6040, 1998). The biological relevance of theN-glycosylase-associated AP lyase activity in the repair of abasic sites is not well understood, and the majority of AP sites in vivo are thought to be processed by Apn1p, the major AP endonuclease in yeast. We have found that yeast cells simultaneously lacking Ntg1p, Ntg2p, and Apn1p are hyperrecombinogenic (hyper-rec) and exhibit a mutator phenotype but are not sensitive to the oxidizing agents H2O2 and menadione. The additional disruption of the RAD52 gene in the ntg1 ntg2 apn1 triple mutant confers a high degree of sensitivity to these agents. The hyper-rec and mutator phenotypes of the ntg1 ntg2 apn1 triple mutant are further enhanced by the elimination of the nucleotide excision repair pathway. In addition, removal of either the lesion bypass (Rev3p-dependent) or recombination (Rad52p-dependent) pathway specifically enhances the hyper-rec or mutator phenotype, respectively. These data suggest that multiple pathways with overlapping specificities are involved in the removal of, or tolerance to, spontaneous DNA damage in S. cerevisiae. In addition, the fact that these responses to induced and spontaneous damage depend upon the simultaneous loss of Ntg1p, Ntg2p, and Apn1p suggests a physiological role for the AP lyase activity of Ntg1p and Ntg2p in vivo.

scholarly journals Skp1p and the F-Box Protein Rcy1p Form a Non-SCF Complex Involved in Recycling of the SNARE Snc1p in Yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 3105-3117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Marc Galan ◽  
Andreas Wiederkehr ◽  
Jae Hong Seol ◽  
Rosine Haguenauer-Tsapis ◽  
Raymond J. Deshaies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Substrate Specificity ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Polarized Growth ◽  
Core Complex ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Scf Complex ◽  
F Box Protein

ABSTRACT Skp1p–cullin–F-box protein (SCF) complexes are ubiquitin-ligases composed of a core complex including Skp1p, Cdc53p, Hrt1p, the E2 enzyme Cdc34p, and one of multiple F-box proteins which are thought to provide substrate specificity to the complex. Here we show that the F-box protein Rcy1p is required for recycling of the v-SNARE Snc1p inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Rcy1p localized to areas of polarized growth, and this polarized localization required its CAAX box and an intact actin cytoskeleton. Rcy1p interacted with Skp1p in vivo in an F-box-dependent manner, and both deletion of its F box and loss of Skp1p function impaired recycling. In contrast, cells deficient in Cdc53p, Hrt1p, or Cdc34p did not exhibit recycling defects. Unlike the case for F-box proteins that are known to participate in SCF complexes, degradation of Rcy1p required neither its F box nor functional 26S proteasomes or other SCF core subunits. Importantly, Skp1p was the only major partner that copurified with Rcy1p. Our results thus suggest that a complex composed of Rcy1p and Skp1p but not other SCF components may play a direct role in recycling of internalized proteins.

scholarly journals Use of Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation To Study In Vivo Interactions between Cdc42p and Rdi1p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen C. Cole ◽  
Heather W. McLaughlin ◽  
Douglas I. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Neck Region ◽  
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Fluorescence Complementation ◽  
Bimolecular Fluorescence

ABSTRACT Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc42p functions as a GTPase molecular switch, activating multiple signaling pathways required to regulate cell cycle progression and the actin cytoskeleton. Regulatory proteins control its GTP binding and hydrolysis and its subcellular localization, ensuring that Cdc42p is appropriately activated and localized at sites of polarized growth during the cell cycle. One of these, the Rdi1p guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor, negatively regulates Cdc42p by extracting it from cellular membranes. In this study, the technique of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) was used to study the dynamic in vivo interactions between Cdc42p and Rdi1p. The BiFC data indicated that Cdc42p and Rdi1p interacted in the cytoplasm and around the periphery of the cell at the plasma membrane and that this interaction was enhanced at sites of polarized cell growth during the cell cycle, i.e., incipient bud sites, tips and sides of small- and medium-sized buds, and the mother-bud neck region. In addition, a ring-like structure containing the Cdc42p-Rdi1p complex transiently appeared following release from G1-phase cell cycle arrest. A homology model of the Cdc42p-Rdi1p complex was used to introduce mutations that were predicted to affect complex formation. These mutations resulted in altered BiFC interactions, restricting the complex exclusively to either the plasma membrane or the cytoplasm. Data from these studies have facilitated the temporal and spatial modeling of Rdi1p-dependent extraction of Cdc42p from the plasma membrane during the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Assembly into chromatin and subtype-specific transcriptional effects of exogenous linker histones directly introduced into a living Physarum cell

2001 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 965-973
Author(s):  
C. Thiriet ◽  
J.J. Hayes
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Living Cell ◽  
Linker Histone ◽  
General Applicability ◽  
Linker Histones ◽  
Functional Differences ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Functional States

The apparent diversity of linker histone subtypes may be related to their specific roles in defining functional states of chromatin in vivo. We have developed a novel method to study constitutive peptides throughout the cell cycle and have demonstrated that an exogenous linker histone could be introduced into a living cell of the slime mold Physarum polycephalum. Here, we have used this method to assess the functional differences between three somatic linker histone subtypes in vivo, and to demonstrate the general applicability of this method. Exogenous linker histone proteins H1 degrees, H5 and H1 were directly absorbed into living cell segments of the naturally synchronous Physarum macroplasmodia at precise cell cycle stages. Fluorescence microscopy, native nucleoprotein gels and immunoblotting of nuclei and chromatin with subtype-specific antibodies revealed that exogenous linker histones were efficiently transported into nuclei and were integrated into chromatin. The immunoreactivity of a preparation of anti-H1 degrees antibodies that are blocked from binding to specific H1 degrees epitopes in native chromatin indicates that the exogenous linker histones were similarly associated into Physarum chromatin. Interestingly, linker histones were found to be less stably associated with Physarum chromatin during S-phase than during G(2)-phase. Furthermore, we show that exogenous linker histones incorporated in early G(2)-phase inhibited transcription and that the level of inhibition correlates with the apparent role of the linker histone subtype in regulating transcription in cells where it normally occurs.

scholarly journals Hir1p and Hir2p function as transcriptional corepressors to regulate histone gene transcription in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 545-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Spector ◽  
A Raff ◽  
H DeSilva ◽  
K Lee ◽  
M A Osley
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcriptional Repressors ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
New Class ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Transcriptional Corepressors ◽  
Histone Gene Transcription

The HIR/HPC (histone regulation/histone periodic control) negative regulators play important roles in the transcription of six of the eight core histone genes during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. The phenotypes of hir1 and hir2 mutants suggested that the wild-type HIR1 and HIR2 genes encode transcriptional repressors that function in the absence of direct DNA binding. When Hir1p and Hir2p were artificially tethered to yeast promoters, each protein repressed transcription, suggesting that they represent a new class of transcriptional corepressors. The two proteins might function as a complex in vivo: Hir2p required both Hir1p and another Hir protein, Hir3p, to repress transcription when it was tethered to an HTA1-lacZ reporter gene, and Hir1p and Hir2p could be coimmunoprecipitated from yeast cell extracts. Tethered Hir1p also directed the periodic transcription of the HTA1 gene and repressed HTA1 transcription in response to two cell cycle regulatory signals. Thus, it represents the first example of a transcriptional corepressor with a direct role in cell cycle-regulated transcription.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document