Specific features in the effect of solar activity on the Earth’s climate changes

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 1010-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Nagovitsyn
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Zherebtsov ◽  
V. A. Kovalenko ◽  
K. E. Kirichenko

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1481
Author(s):  
Francesco Mercati ◽  
Francesco Sunseri

Global warming is negatively impacting on crop yield and Earth’s climate changes can bring possible negative effects on the growth and reproductive success of crops [...]


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Bellamy ◽  
Mike Hulme

Abstract This article explores the influence of personal values and ontological beliefs on people’s perceptions of possible abrupt changes in the Earth’s climate system and on their climate change mitigation preferences. The authors focus on four key areas of risk perception: concern about abrupt climate change as distinct to climate change in general, the likelihood of abrupt climate changes, fears of abrupt climate changes, and preferences in how to mitigate abrupt climate changes. Using cultural theory as an interpretative framework, a multimethodological approach was adopted in exploring these areas: 287 respondents at the University of East Anglia (UK) completed a three-part quantitative questionnaire, with 15 returning to participate in qualitative focus groups to discuss the issues raised in more depth. Supporting the predictions of cultural theory, egalitarians’ values and beliefs were consistently associated with heightened perceptions of the risks posed by abrupt climate change. Yet many believed abrupt climate change to be capricious, irrespective of their psychometrically attributed worldviews or “ways of life.” Mitigation preferences—across all ways of life—were consistent with the “hegemonic myth” dominating climate policy, with many advocating conventional regulatory or market-based approaches. Moreover, a strong fatalistic narrative emerged from within abrupt climate change discourses, with frequent referrals to helplessness, societal collapse, and catastrophe.


2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. I. Stozhkov ◽  
G. A. Bazilevskaya ◽  
V. S. Makhmutov ◽  
N. S. Svirzhevsky ◽  
A. K. Svirzhevskaya ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Ogurtsov ◽  
O. M. Raspopov ◽  
M. Oinonen ◽  
H. Jungner ◽  
M. Lindholm

Author(s):  
L. Voronkov

The author questions the indisputability of the Arctic’s existing climate change assessments and insists on the need to adjust the Arctic strategies of states to different scenarios of such changes. While not denying the impact of human society on the Earth’s climate, the author believes to be important not to limit research on its changes by exclusively natural-scientific aspects, but to include considerations concerning the influence of peculiarities of human society’s development on the climate. He thinks it is important to take into account the combine impact of the changing nature of contemporary industrial activity, of sources for energy supply, the on-going processes of building of “smart” economy and its innovative development, demographic changes, improvement of human capital as well as the impact of increased environmental consciousness of human beings on the global and Arctic climate. Despite the observed climatic changes in the Arctic, it remains ice-covered the major part of the year. Any commercially justified human activities in the Arctic must be based on the need to maintain a year-round exploitation of its resources and possibilities and to create the appropriate infrastructure, machinery and equipment. The author comes to the conclusion that the need to resolve these problems requires considerable financial resources and time.


Author(s):  
Douglas V. Hoyt ◽  
Kenneth H. Shatten

Until now we have considered only 11-year variations in solar activity and climate. The sun also varies on longer time scales. Since these variations seem to parallel a number of climatic changes, the sun may contribute to climatic changes on time scales of decades to centuries. We now examine several solar indices that vary in parallel with Earth’s climate change. There exist plausible arguments that these indices are proxy indicators of the sun’s radiative output, but there is no proof. We now present the strongest correlations we have seen for a sun/climate connection. First, as it is the most widely publicized index, we consider the mean level of solar activity. In 1801 Herschel first proposed a relationship between climate and the level of solar activity. Second, we examine solar cycle lengths, which have been studied sporadically since 1905. Third, we look at two closely related indices—sunspot structure and sunspot decay rates. Fourth, we consider variations in the solar rotation rate. Lastly, we examine some major solar and climatic events of the last thousand years to see if any indications of solar influence are evident on climate. Although we present the solar-induced changes as arising from total-irradiance variations, as discussed earlier spectral-irradiance changes may be the primary driver. When Rudolf Wolf reconstructed solar activity based on historical observations of sunspots, he found an 11-year cycle going back to at least 1700. In 1853 Wolf also claimed that there is an 83-year sunspot cycle. This longer term variation becomes evident simply by smoothing the data, as in Socher’s 1939 example. Wolf’s original discovery of an 83-year cycle was forgotten, but the long cycle was rediscovered by H. H. Turner, W. Schmidt, H. H. Clayton, and probably others. After W. Gleissberg also discovered this 80- to 90-year cycle around 1938, he published so much material on the subject that ever since it has been called the Gleissberg cycle. All these rediscoveries of the same phenomenon indicate that the 80- to 90-year cycle may be real but not strictly periodic. Rather, the cycle may be a “persistency” with an 80- to 90-year period. During this period solar activity is quite powerful but fails to exhibit a single sharp spectral peak.


Over the past two days, we have covered many facets of the basic interactions between the solar activity and the Earth’s climate. As an astronomer, I should perhaps first comment on the fact that solar activity is not the only astronomical or astrophysical phenomenon to influence physical conditions in the biosphere. Over a very long timescale of thousands of millions of years the evolution of the Sun from a pre-main-sequence star to a star of G type has not only fundamentally controlled the physical and chemical processes in the formation of the planets but has controlled their surface physical characteristics. Over timescales an order of magnitude less, the location of the Solar System in the Galaxy may have influenced life on Earth. For example it has been noted that when the Sun crossed the spiral arms of the Galaxy and their dense dust clouds, some catastrophies might have resulted; the disappearance of the dinosaurs could be accounted for by such phenomena, as was once suggested by Sir William McCrea, F.R.S.; but nearby supernovae, grazing comets, and on large meteorites might very well have played a decisive role in the evolution of species and of our Earth. On a smaller timescale, a million years, the variation in solar energy falling on the Earth, due to secular changes in the terrestrial orbit parameters (Milankovitch-Berger theories), would have caused climatic changes and have been shown to account for the successive ice ages of the Quaternary. While bearing this in mind the role of solar activity on the timescale of recent millennia, but also on shorter timescales, is of obvious importance to society and, as we have seen in this meeting, is only now being properly investigated.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah S. Eggleston ◽  
Oliver Bothe ◽  
Nerilie Abram ◽  
Bronwen Konecky ◽  
Hans Linderholm ◽  
...  

<p>The past two thousand years is a key interval for climate science because this period encompasses both the era of human-induced global warming and a much longer interval when changes in Earth's climate were governed principally by natural drivers. This earlier 'pre-industrial' period is particularly important for two reasons. Firstly, we now have a growing number of well-dated, climate sensitive proxy data with high temporal resolution that spans the full period. Secondly, the pre-industrial climate provides context for present-day climate change, sets real-world targets against which to evaluate the performance of climate models, and allows us to address other questions of Earth sciences that cannot be answered using only a century and a half of observational data. </p><p>Here, we first provide several perspectives on the concept of a 'pre-industrial climate'. Then, we highlight the activities of the PAGES 2k Network, an international collaborative effort focused on global climate change during the past two thousand years. We highlight those aspects of pre-industrial conditions (including both past climate changes and past climate drivers) that are not yet well constrained, and suggest potential areas for research during this period that would be relevant to the evolution of Earth's future climate.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document