Risk factors for overuse shoulder injuries in a mixed-sex cohort of 329 elite handball players: previous findings could not be confirmed

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (18) ◽  
pp. 1191-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stig Haugsboe Andersson ◽  
Roald Bahr ◽  
Benjamin Clarsen ◽  
Grethe Myklebust

BackgroundShoulder injuries are common among handball players and predominantly characterised by overuse characteristics. Reduced total glenohumeral rotation, external rotation weakness and scapular dyskinesis have been identified as risk factors among elite male handball players.AimTo assess whether previously identified risk factors are associated with overuse shoulder injuries in a large cohort of elite male and female handball players.Methods329 players (168 male, 161 female) from the two upper divisions in Norway were included and tested prior to the 2014–2015 season. Measures included glenohumeral internal and external rotation range of motion, isometric internal and external rotation strength, and assessment of scapular dyskinesis. Players were followed prospectively for one competitive season, with prevalence and severity of shoulder problems registered monthly using the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire. A severity score based on players’ questionnaire responses was used as the outcome measure in multivariable logistic regression to investigate associations between candidate risk factors and overuse shoulder injury.ResultsNo significant associations were found between total rotation (OR 1.05 per 5° change, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.13), external rotation strength (OR 1.05 per 10 N change, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.20) or obvious scapular dyskinesis (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.25 to 5.99) and overuse shoulder injury. A significant positive association was found between greater internal rotation (OR 1.16 per 5° change, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.34) and overuse shoulder injury.ConclusionNone of the previously identified risk factors were associated with overuse shoulder injuries in a mixed-sex cohort of elite handball players.

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Tate ◽  
Gregory N. Turner ◽  
Sarah E. Knab ◽  
Colbie Jorgensen ◽  
Andrew Strittmatter ◽  
...  

Context: The prevalence of shoulder pain among competitive swimmers is high, but no guidelines exist to reduce shoulder injuries. Elucidating differences between swimmers with and without shoulder pain can serve as a basis for the development of a program to prevent shoulder injury that might lead to pain and dysfunction. Objective: To determine whether physical characteristics, exposure, or training variables differ between swimmers with and without shoulder pain or disability. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Multisite swimming centers. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 236 competitive female swimmers aged 8 to 77 years. Data Collection and Analysis: Participants completed the Penn Shoulder Score and underwent testing of core endurance, range of motion, muscle force production, and pectoralis minor muscle length and the Scapular Dyskinesis Test. Swimmers were grouped by age for analysis: ages 8 to 11 years (n = 42), 12 to 14 years (n = 43), 15 to 19 years (high school, n = 84), and 23 to 77 years (masters, n = 67). Comparisons were made between groups with and without pain and disability using independent t tests for continuous data and χ2 analyses and Fisher exact tests for categorical data. Results: Nine (21.4%) swimmers aged 8 to 11 years, 8 (18.6%) swimmers aged 12 to 14 years, 19 (22.6%) high school swimmers, and 13 (19.4%) masters swimmers had shoulder pain and disability. Differences that were found in 2 or more age groups between athletes with and without shoulder pain and disability included greater swimming exposure, a higher incidence of previous traumatic injury and patient-rated shoulder instability, and reduced participation in another sport in the symptomatic groups (P < .05). Reduced shoulder flexion motion, weakness of the middle trapezius and internal rotation, shorter pectoralis minor and latissimus, participation in water polo, and decreased core endurance were found in symptomatic females in single varying age groups (P < .05). Conclusions: Female competitive swimmers have shoulder pain and disability throughout their lives. Given that exposure and physical examination findings varied between athletes with and without substantial pain and disability, a program to prevent shoulder injury that might lead to pain and dysfunction appears warranted and might include exposure reduction, cross-training, pectoral and posterior shoulder stretching, strengthening, and core endurance training.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 478-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Tooth ◽  
Amandine Gofflot ◽  
Cédric Schwartz ◽  
Jean-Louis Croisier ◽  
Charlotte Beaudart ◽  
...  

Context: Shoulder injuries are highly prevalent in sports involving the upper extremity. Some risk factors have been identified in the literature, but consensus is still lacking. Objectives: To identify risk factors of overuse shoulder injury in overhead athletes, as described in the literature. Data Sources: A systematic review of the literature from the years 1970 to 2018 was performed using 2 electronic databases: PubMed and Scopus. Study Selection: Prospective studies, written in English, that described at least 1 risk factor associated with overuse shoulder injuries in overhead sports (volleyball, handball, basketball, swimming, water polo, badminton, baseball, and tennis) were considered for analysis. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Data Extraction: Data were extracted from 25 studies. Study methodology quality was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Results: Intrinsic factors, previous injury, range of motion (lack or excess), and rotator cuff weakness (isometric and isokinetic) highly increase the risk of future injuries. Additionally, years of athletic practice, body mass index, sex, age, and level of play seem to have modest influence. As for the effect of scapular dysfunction on shoulder injuries, it is still controversial, though these are typically linked. Extrinsic factors, field position, condition of practice (match/training), time of season, and training load also have influence on the occurrence of shoulder injuries. Conclusion: Range of motion, rotator cuff muscle weakness, and training load are important modifiable factors associated with shoulder injuries. Scapular dysfunction may also have influence. The preventive approach for shoulder injury should focus on these factors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (20) ◽  
pp. 1312-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Asker ◽  
Hannah L Brooke ◽  
Markus Waldén ◽  
Ulrika Tranaeus ◽  
Fredrik Johansson ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess the evidence for risk factors and prevention measures for shoulder injuries in overhead sports.DesignSystematic review with best-evidence synthesis.Data sourcesMedline (Ovid), PubMed (complementary search), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane (Wiley), SPORTDiscus (Ebsco) and Web of Science Core Collection (Thomson Reuters), from 1 January 1990 to 15 May 2017.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesRandomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case-control studies on risk factors or prevention measures for shoulder injuries in overhead sports. The eligible studies were quality assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria.ResultsOf 4778 studies identified, 38 were eligible for quality review and 17 met the quality criteria to be included in the evidence synthesis. One additional quality study presented a shoulder injury prevention programme. Most studies focused on baseball, lacrosse or volleyball (n=13). The risk factors examined included participation level (competition vs training) (n=10), sex (n=4), biomechanics (n=2) and external workload (n=2). The evidence for all risk factors was limited or conflicting. The effect of the prevention programme within the subgroup of uninjured players at baseline was modest and possibly lacked statistical power.ConclusionsAll investigated potential risk factors for shoulder injury in overhead sports had limited evidence, and most were non-modifiable (eg, sex). There is also limited evidence for the effect of shoulder injury prevention measures in overhead sports.PROSPERO trial registration numberCRD42015026850.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima alzahra Hasan Yakti ◽  
Hissa Al-Mannai ◽  
Dana Saad ◽  
Abdelhamid Kerkadi ◽  
Grace Attieh ◽  
...  

Background: Lifestyle behavior risk factors (LBRs) such as sedentary behavior, physical inactivity, smoking, unhealthy eating patterns and being overweight/obese play a major role in the development or prevention of NCDs. Objective: Compare the clustering of LBRs between urban and rural Algerian adolescents. We expect differences in LBRs between urban and rural area. Design: Data of this cross-sectional study was derived from GSHS. Self-administered, anonymous questionnaire was filled out by 4532 adolescents (11–16 years), which addressed LBRs of NCDs. LBRs clustering was measured by the ratios of observed (O) and expected (E) prevalence of one or more simultaneously occurring LBRs for urban and rural area separately. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to examine the association of LBRs as dependent variable with demographic variables (location, age, gender). Results: The most common LBR was physical inactivity (84.6%: 50.9% for urban and 49.1% for rural). Adolescents in urban area had a higher prevalence of two (56.8% vs. 43.2%) and three and more (61.3 vs. 38.7%) LBRs than rural. In urban area, a significant positive association was found between: (low fruits and vegetables + physical inactivity) [2.06 (1.61-2.64)] and (high SB + smoking) [2.10 (1.54-2.76)], while (physical inactivity + high SB) [0.70 (0.54-0.91)] showed a significant negative association. In rural area, (high SB + overweight/obesity) [1.49 (1.09-2.04)] had a significant positive association. While, (low fruits and vegetables + high SB) [0.75 (0.60-0.94)], (physical inactivity + high SB) [0.65 (0.49-0.86)] and (physical inactivity + smoking) [0.70 (0.49-0.99)] had a negative association. Conclusions: Several socio-demographic factors have been identified to play a role in LBRs clustering among Algerian adolescents. Results of the study suggest the development of intervention aiming to tackle different LBRs rather than focusing on a single LBR.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 982-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Norton ◽  
Christopher Honstad ◽  
Rajat Joshi ◽  
Matthew Silvis ◽  
Vernon Chinchilli ◽  
...  

Background: The incidence of shoulder and elbow injuries among adolescent baseball players is on the rise. These injuries may lead to surgery or retirement at a young age. Purpose: To identify independent risk factors for elbow and shoulder injuries in adolescent baseball players. A secondary aim was to determine whether the literature supports the Major League Baseball and USA Baseball Pitch Smart guidelines. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines utilizing MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Because of study heterogeneity, a quantitative synthesis was not performed. A qualitative review was performed on 19 independent risk factors for elbow and shoulder injuries in adolescent baseball players. Level of evidence was assigned per the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, and risk of bias was graded per the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Twenty-two articles met criteria for inclusion. Of the 19 independent variables that were analyzed, age, height, playing for multiple teams, pitch velocity, and arm fatigue were found to be independent risk factors for throwing arm injuries. Pitches per game appears to be a risk factor for shoulder injuries. Seven independent variables (innings pitched per game, showcase participation, games per year, training days per week, pitch type, shoulder external rotation, and shoulder total range of motion) do not appear to be significant risk factors. The data were inconclusive for the remaining 6 variables (weight, months of pitching per year, innings or pitches per year, catching, shoulder horizontal adduction, and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit). Conclusion: The results from this study demonstrate that age, height, playing for multiple teams, pitch velocity, and arm fatigue are clear risk factors for throwing arm injuries in adolescent baseball players. Pitches per game appears to be a risk factor for shoulder injuries. Other variables are either inconclusive or do not appear to be specific risk factors for injuries.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burkhard Emanuel Jabs ◽  
Andreas Joachim Bartsch ◽  
Bruno Pfuhlmann

AbstractObjectivePatients treated by neuroleptics often develop neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism (NIP) to a varying extent. The reasons for this are discussed controversially in the literature. Previous transcranial sonography (TCS) findings of the substantia nigra (SN) in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease suggest a correlation of echogenicity with nigrostriatal dysfunction.MethodsOne hundred psychiatric patients receiving neuroleptics were included. They underwent clinical examination for NIP (Simpson and Angus-scale) and, independently, TCS of the SN. History of smoking habits and medication were taken from the patient’s chart.ResultsWe found a significant positive association of the prevalence of NIP with age (P < 0.01) and the echogenic area of the SN (P < 0.05). Neither type nor dosage of the neuroleptics was found to have any significant impact on the occurrence of NIP. Smokers displayed lower prevalence of NIP (P < 0.05) and lower EPS scores (P < 0.01).ConclusionsThese findings suggest that age and increased size of SN echogenicity are possible risk factors for NIP. In contrast, smoking seems to have a certain protecting effect.


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Thurston ◽  
Jemma Kerns ◽  
Frank Dondelinger ◽  
Alison Hale ◽  
Marwan Bukhari

Abstract Background/Aims  Body composition changes are associated with changes in bone mineral density (BMD). Composite measures of body compartments, such as weight and body mass index (BMI) have a positive association with BMD. The aim was to study average percent fat from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a potentially useful clinical measurement. Methods  BMD data in grams/cenitmetre2 was collected from DEXA scans after referral from secondary care to the Royal Lancaster Infirmary from 2004-2010. BMD data related to the left and right hip (the neck, Ward’s area, trochanter, and total hip), and the spine (L1-L4) was measured. Data was collected longitudinally, and BMD in g/cm2 was modelled at the regions of the hip and spine using mixed effects linear models. Average percent fat and weight (kg) were used as explanatory variables, whilst adjusting for age at scan, gender, and other risk factors such as FRAX risk factors. Results  7910 patients (88% female) were included, all with average percent fat and weight measurements. The results of the models (Table 1) all have a P value&lt;0.05. Average percent fat had a significant negative association at all regions of the left and right hip, but a significant positive association at the spine. Weight showed a significant positive association with BMD at the hip and spine. P119 Table 1:Effect size estimates from mixed effects models of BMD at regions of the hip, and the spine.Anatomical locationEffect size estimate for average percent fat (95% confidence intervals)Effect size estimate for weight (95% confidence intervals)Left neck-6.63x10-4 (-9.69x10-4, -3.56x10-4)2.07x10-3 (1.91x10-3, 2.23x10-3)Left total-1.03x10-3 (-1.32x10-3, -7.41x10-4)3.45x10-3 (3.29x10-3, 3.61x10-3)Left Ward’s-1.07x10-3 (-1.38x10-3, -7.65x10-4)1.85x10-3 (1.69x10-3, 2.02x10-3)Left trochanter-1.15x10-3 (-1.46x10-3, -8.47x10-4)3.65x10-3 (3.48x10-3, 3.81x10-3)Right neck-6.91x10-4 (-9.94x10-4, -3.88x10-4)1.97x10-3 (1.81x10-3, 2.14x10-3)Right total-1.19x10-3 (-1.48x10-3, -8.96x10-4)3.39x10-3 (3.23x10-3, 3.55x10-3)Right Ward’s-1.07x10-3 (-1.38x10-3, -7.65x10-4)1.85x10-3 (1.69x10-3, 2.02x10-3)Right trochanter-1.19x10-3 (-1.52x10-3, -8.72x10-4)3.65x10-3 (3.39x10-3, 3.73x10-3)Spine (averaged L1-L4)1.76x10-3 (1.46x10-3, 2.05x10-3)1.42x10-3 (1.16x10-3, 1.68x10-3) Conclusion  The negative association seen with average percent fat at the hip could reflect the potential negative endocrine effects of fat, and the effect of localized inflammation at the hip. Increased adiposity is also linked to sarcopenia, and further body compositional changes. However, the potential negative effects of increased adiposity at the abdomen and spine are potentially overridden by the increased biomechanical loading generated by the increased adiposity, highlighted by weight’s positive association with BMD at the spine. The average percent fat results are not mirrored with weight at the hip. This highlights that composite measures are not specific enough to measure changes in body composition compartments, and their resulting change in risk related to BMD. Disclosure  C. Thurston: None. J. Kerns: None. F. Dondelinger: None. A. Hale: None. M. Bukhari: None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document