Thromboembolic events and antithrombotic prophylaxis in advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with bevacizumab: secondary analysis of the phase IV MITO-16A/MaNGO-OV2A trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1348-1355
Author(s):  
Raimondo Di Liello ◽  
Laura Arenare ◽  
Francesco Raspagliesi ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Carmela Pisano ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe use of routine antithrombotic prophylaxis is not recommended for advanced cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The effect of bevacizumab-containing therapy on the risk of thromboembolic events remains controversial in ovarian cancer patients. We report on the incidence of thromboembolic events and the prevalence of antithrombotic therapy in patients enrolled in the single arm, phase IV, MITO-16A/MaNGO-OV2A trial.MethodsIn this trial, potential prognostic factors for patients with previously untreated ovarian cancer receiving a combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab were explored and the final analysis has already been reported. In this secondary analysis, the occurrence of thromboembolic events and the use of antithrombotic therapy were described according to the clinical characteristics of the patients. The prognostic role of thromboembolic events for progression-free and overall survival were also evaluated.ResultsFrom October 2012 to November 2014, 398 eligible patients were enrolled. 76 patients (19.1%) were receiving some type of anticoagulant or anti-aggregant treatment at baseline. Overall, 24 thromboembolic events were reported (cumulative incidence of 6.0%). The occurrence of thromboembolic events was not associated with baseline patient characteristics and was not modified by the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.0). Occurrence of thromboembolic events was not associated with progression-free survival (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.15) or overall survival (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.61).ConclusionsIn our study, a 6.0% rate of thromboembolic events was reported during treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Thromboembolic events were not associated with the clinical characteristics of the patients or with the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis, nor did they significantly affect the long-term prognosis.Trial registration numberNCT01706120

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (45) ◽  
pp. e12996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo Zhang ◽  
Qian Xiang ◽  
Guangyan Mu ◽  
Qiufen Xie ◽  
Shuqing Chen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1263-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Woolston ◽  
Suha Deen ◽  
Ahmad Al-Attar ◽  
Mohamed Shehata ◽  
Stephen Y. Chan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Andre B. A. Da Costa ◽  
Marcela Marinelli Salvadori ◽  
Camila Vieira Valadares ◽  
Carlos Stecca ◽  
Louise Brot ◽  
...  

5576 Background: Ovarian carcinomas show homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in up to 50% of cases and in 15 to 20% of cases occur due to germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. BRCA mutated tumors are more sensitive to PARP inhibitors and platinum based chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to characterize a cohort of ovarian cancer patients regarding HRD and to evaluate the impact of these scores in prolonged platinum sensitivity. Methods: Thirty one ovarian cancer patients with platinum resistant recurrence reexposed to platinum based chemotherapy were selected. Paraffin embedded tumor samples from 14 patients were analyzed using ONCOSCAN assay (Affymetrix) to evaluate HRD scores. The association of the scores with response rate to platinum rechallenge, overall survival and clinical pathologic factors was evaluated. Results: From the cohort of 31 patients, 15 samples from 14 patients were analyzed for genomic alterations. Median scores were 19.5 for TAI, 12.5 for cnLOH+L, 26.0 for LST and 6.3 for HRD. High scores were found in 10 out of 14 (for cnLOH+L score) and 9 out of 14 (for LST score) patients. Seven of the 14 patients analyzed analyzed for genomic alterations had response, which suggested homologous recombination deficiency. No significant differences were observed between response rates for high versus low scores. Numerically, cnLOH+L, LST and HDR scores were higher in patients with response to treatment compared to those without response. Median overall survival was 13.4 months from the beginning of platinum rechallenge and no difference in survival according to scores was observed. Among the clinical pathologic factors, family history of breast or ovarian cancer or personal history of breast cancer was associated to higher response rate to platinum rechallenge. Conclusions: In conclusion,HRD scores showed to be potential markers of response to platinum rechallenge in the platinum resistant setting. Further studies are necessary to clarify the best cutoffs for each score, the impact of tumor heterogeneity and the analysis of tumor samples in the moment of treatment. Positive family history of cancer is a clinical factor predictvie of platinum rechallenge response.


Aging ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1366-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Zhang ◽  
Lixiao Yang ◽  
Xiaohong Xiang ◽  
Zhuoying Li ◽  
Kai Qu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingshan He ◽  
Liwen Huang ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
Zhiqiao Zhang

Background: The tumour immune microenvironment plays an important role in the biological mechanisms of tumorigenesis and progression. Artificial intelligence medicine studies based on big data and advanced algorithms are helpful for improving the accuracy of prediction models of tumour prognosis. The current research aims to explore potential prognostic immune biomarkers and develop a predictive model for the overall survival of ovarian cancer (OC) based on artificial intelligence algorithms.Methods: Differential expression analyses were performed between normal tissues and tumour tissues. Potential prognostic biomarkers were identified using univariate Cox regression. An immune regulatory network was constructed of prognostic immune genes and their highly related transcription factors. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify potential independent prognostic immune factors and develop a prognostic model for ovarian cancer patients. Three artificial intelligence algorithms, random survival forest, multitask logistic regression, and Cox survival regression, were used to develop a novel artificial intelligence survival prediction system.Results: The current study identified 1,307 differentially expressed genes and 337 differentially expressed immune genes between tumour samples and normal samples. Further univariate Cox regression identified 84 prognostic immune gene biomarkers for ovarian cancer patients in the model dataset (GSE32062 dataset and GSE53963 dataset). An immune regulatory network was constructed involving 63 immune genes and 5 transcription factors. Fourteen immune genes (PSMB9, FOXJ1, IFT57, MAL, ANXA4, CTSH, SCRN1, MIF, LTBR, CTSD, KIFAP3, PSMB8, HSPA5, and LTN1) were recognised as independent risk factors by multivariate Cox analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that these 14 prognostic immune genes were closely related to the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. A prognostic nomogram was developed by using these 14 prognostic immune genes. The concordance indexes were 0.760, 0.733, and 0.765 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival, respectively. This prognostic model could differentiate high-risk patients with poor overall survival from low-risk patients. According to three artificial intelligence algorithms, the current study developed an artificial intelligence survival predictive system that could provide three individual mortality risk curves for ovarian cancer.Conclusion: In conclusion, the current study identified 1,307 differentially expressed genes and 337 differentially expressed immune genes in ovarian cancer patients. Multivariate Cox analyses identified fourteen prognostic immune biomarkers for ovarian cancer. The current study constructed an immune regulatory network involving 63 immune genes and 5 transcription factors, revealing potential regulatory associations among immune genes and transcription factors. The current study developed a prognostic model to predict the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. The current study further developed two artificial intelligence predictive tools for ovarian cancer, which are available at https://zhangzhiqiao8.shinyapps.io/Smart_Cancer_Survival_Predictive_System_17_OC_F1001/ and https://zhangzhiqiao8.shinyapps.io/Gene_Survival_Subgroup_Analysis_17_OC_F1001/. An artificial intelligence survival predictive system could help improve individualised treatment decision-making.


2022 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian M. Klein ◽  
Maria Bozko ◽  
Astrid Toennießen ◽  
Nisar P. Malek ◽  
Przemyslaw Bozko

Background: Ovarian cancer is one of the most aggressive types of gynecologic cancers. Many patients have a relapse within two years after diagnosis and subsequent therapy. Among different genetic changes generally believed to be important for the development of cancer, TP53 is the most common mutation in the case of ovarian tumors. Objective: Our work aims to compare the outcomes of different comparisons based on the overall survival of ovarian cancer patients, determination of TP53 status, and amount of p53 protein in tumor tissues. Methods: We analyzed and compared a collective of 436 ovarian patient’s data. Extracted data include TP53 mutation status, p53 protein level, and information on the overall survival. Values for p53 protein level in dependence of TP53 mutation status were compared using the Independent-Samples t-Test. Survival analyses were displayed by Kaplan-Meier plots, using the log-rank test to check for statistical significance. Results: We have not found any statistically significant correlations between determination of TP53 status, amount of p53 protein in tumor tissues, and overall survival of ovarian cancer patients. Conclusion: In ovarian tumors both determination of TP53 status as well as p53 protein amount has only limited diagnostic importance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1327-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Christina Fotopoulou ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
...  

BackgroundPrimary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy has been considered standard management for patients with advanced ovarian cancer over decades. An alternative approach of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was subsequently reported by two randomized phase III trials (EORTC‐GCG, CHORUS), which were criticized owing to important limitations, especially regarding the rate of complete resection.Primary ObjectiveTo clarify the optimal timing of surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer.Study HypothesisPrimary cytoreductive surgery is superior to interval cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Trial DesignTRUST is an international open, randomized, controlled multi-center trial investigating overall survival after primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with FIGO stage IIIB–IVB ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma. To guarantee adequate surgical quality, participating centers need to fulfill specific quality assurance criteria (eg, ≥50% complete resection rate in upfront surgery for FIGO IIIB–IVB patients, ≥36 debulking-surgeries/year) and agree to independent audits by TRUST quality committee delegates. Patients in the primary cytoreductive surgery arm undergo surgery followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas patients in the interval cytoreductive surgery arm undergo 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy after histologic confirmation of the disease, followed by interval cytoreductive surgery and subsequently, 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. The intention of surgery for both groups is complete tumor resection according to guideline recommendations.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaMajor inclusion criteria are suspected or histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma FIGO stage IIIB–IVB (IV only if resectable metastasis). Major exclusion criteria are non-epithelial ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors; prior chemotherapy for ovarian cancer; or abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy.Primary EndpointOverall survival.Sample Size772 patients.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsAccrual completion approximately mid-2019, results are expected after 5 years' follow-up in 2024.Trial RegistrationNCT02828618.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document