scholarly journals Combined lenvatinib and pembrolizumab as salvage therapy in advanced adrenal cortical carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001009
Author(s):  
Sara Bedrose ◽  
Kevin Charles Miller ◽  
Lina Altameemi ◽  
Mohamed S Ali ◽  
Sameh Nassar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
First Case ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

BackgroundThere is no effective systemic therapy for metastatic adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The efficacies of single-agent oral multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) or salvage immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been very limited. It is unknown whether combining CPIs, such as pembrolizumab (PEM), with other therapies, such as MKIs, could yield higher response rates in ACC, yet this combination has shown promise in other cancers. Herein, we describe the first case series using PEM in combination with the MKI lenvatinib (LEN) in patients with progressive, metastatic ACC.MethodsA retrospective case series describing the use of LEN/PEM as salvage therapy in patients with progressive/metastatic ACC.ResultsEight patients were treated with the LEN/PEM combination therapy. Half were female, and the median age at time of diagnosis was 38 years (range 21–49). Three (37.5%) patients had hormonally active ACC. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 4 (range 2–9). Six (75%) patients had had disease progression on prior CPIs and five (62.5%) patients had progressed on prior MKI therapy. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI 1.8–not reached) and median duration of therapy was 8.5 months (range 2–22). Two (25%) patients had a partial response, one (12.5%) patient had stable disease, and five (62.5%) patients had progressive disease. None of the eight patients stopped therapy because of adverse events.ConclusionsIn our small cohort of heavily pretreated patients with ACC, the combination of LEN/PEM was associated with objective responses in a subset of patients without significant toxicity. This combination should be formally investigated in phase II clinical trial with robust correlative studies to identify predictors for response.

Response to selpercatinib versus prior systemic therapy in patients (pts) with RET fusion+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9032-9032
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Drilon ◽  
Oliver Gautschi ◽  
Benjamin Besse ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Systemic Therapies

9032 Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective, potent, CNS-active RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of RET fusion+ lung or thyroid cancers. Selpercatinib demonstrated durable antitumor activity in previously treated pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC in an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial, LIBRETTO-001 (Besse et al., ASCO 2021). Methods: Pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC enrolled in the global, multicenter, LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128; 16 countries, 89 sites). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety. This post-hoc intrapatient analysis was based on a 30 March 2020 data cutoff date. Historical physician-reported best overall response (BOR) from last systemic therapy received prior to enrollment was compared with selpercatinib BOR by independent review committee per RECIST v1.1, with each patient serving as his/her own control. Results: In efficacy-evaluable pts (N = 218) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo), median pt age was 61 years, the majority with ECOG of 0/1 (37%/61%), with a median of 2 (range: 1-15) prior systemic therapies. Overall, 57% of patients responded to selpercatinib while 16% responded to the immediate prior therapy. ORR improvements with selpercatinib were observed regardless of prior therapy: chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (57% vs 14%), single-agent ICI (48% vs 3%), or chemotherapy (58% vs 15%). A total of 108 patients (49%) did not respond to immediate prior therapy but responded to selpercatinib. Fewer patients had progressive disease as their BOR with selpercatinib (2%) compared to the immediate prior therapy (28%). The median duration of therapy for selpercatinib was notably extended compared with that of the immediate prior therapy (11.8 vs. 3.4 months, respectively). Conclusions: In pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC treated on LIBRETTO-001, systemic therapies administered prior to enrollment achieved less meaningful clinical benefit than selpercatinib. Selpercatinib demonstrated consistent efficacy regardless of the type of prior therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.

AGO-OVAR 2.29 (ENGOT-ov34): Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5601-TPS5601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik Marme ◽  
Patricia Pautier ◽  
Els Van Nieuwenhuysen ◽  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Andres Redondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS5601 Background: A standard non-platinum based treatment option in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer is bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, but responses are still short-lived. Checkpoint-inhibitors as single agent have limited activity in ovarian cancer. However, the role of the checkpoint-inhibitor like atezolizumab, in addition to chemotherapy and bevacizumab in ovarian cancer is so far undefined. Methods: AGO-OVAR 2.29 is a randomized (1:1), double blinded, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) compared with placebo plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian-, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with 1st or 2nd relapse within 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy or 3rd relapse. A tumor biopsy available at study entry for PD-L1 testing is mandatory. Patients are treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab +/- atezolizumab/placebo until progression or prohibitive toxicity. Co-primary endpoints are overall survival and progression-free survival. It is planned to randomize 664 patients. A safety interim analysis will be done when 24 patients have been randomized and completed at least cycle 1. As of 1st February 2019, 24 patients have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03353831.

Second-line chemotherapy with cabzitaxel and prednisolone (CP) in castratation-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Tolerability and efficacy—A U.K. institution experience.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15128-e15128
Author(s):  
Amir H Montazeri ◽  
Chinnamani Eswarvee ◽  
Helen Wong ◽  
Zafar I Malik
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
First Case ◽  
Docetaxel Treatment ◽  
Retrospective Case Study

e15128 Background: There are limited options for CRPC patients post docetaxel treatment. The majority of these patients have advanced disease with bone metastasis and often have reduced marrow reserve. Cabazitaxel is a novel taxane with activity in docetaxel-resistant/ sensitive cancers with proven clinical benefit in a phase 3 trial. Concerns have been expressed about efficacy and toxicity of this agent in a non trial population. Methods: In this retrospective case study, patients with CRPC treated with CP between Jan-Dec 2011 were included. Response rates (PSA, ALP, radiological) and toxicities (CTCAE) were recorded. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v18. Results: 22 men received CP with pegfilgrastim. 41% completed at least 6 cycles of CP and 23% completed 10 cycles. 27% had radiological partial response (RECIST). 36% of patients had ≥50% reduction in PSA level and 61% of patients with elevated ALP had ≥50% reduction. Median follow up was 7.9 months. Progression was defined as clinical, PSA or radiological. 3 patients discontinued treatment because of abnormal LFTs and a further 5 patients for toxicities summarised below. Conclusions: Response rates (RR) in our series (RECIST 27% & PSA 36%) compared favourably with those in the TROPIC trial (14% & 39% respectively) and support CP as an effective and well tolerated option in CRPC. An intriguing finding was the significant RR in ALP level with CP. This may reflect bone penetration of this agent and may correlate with symptom relief and improved clinical outcome. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate this marker with clinical outcome. Data for time to progression, progression free survival and overall survival is immature at this stage and will be updated for the meeting. To our knowledge this is the first case series of patients treated with CP presented outside a clinical trial. [Table: see text]

Rucaparib for recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results from ATLAS, a phase II open-label trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 440-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Susan Feyerabend ◽  
Rafael Morales-Barrera ◽  
Min Yuen Teo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated

440 Background: ATLAS (NCT03397394) evaluated the efficacy/safety of the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) rucaparib in patients (pts) with previously treated locally advanced/unresectable UC or mUC. Methods: Pts with measurable disease who had progressed after 1–2 prior regimens (ie, platinum-based chemotherapy [PBC] and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICI]) were enrolled regardless of tumor homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Prior PARPi was not allowed. Pts received rucaparib 600 mg PO BID. Baseline tumor tissue or archival tissue ≤6 mo without intervening therapy was required; serial circulating tumor DNA samples were collected. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) in the intent-to-treat and HRD-positive (defined as genomic loss of heterozygosity ≥10%) populations. Key secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as complete or partial response or stable disease (SD) lasting ≥16 weeks. Results: As of Oct 7, 2019, 97 pts were enrolled (median age 66 y [range, 39–87]); most were men (n=76, 78.4%) and had ECOG PS 1 (n=65, 67.0%). Sixty-six pts (68.0%) had both prior PBC and ICI. Twenty pts (20.6%) were HRD-positive, 30 (30.9%) were HRD-negative and 47 (48.5%) had unknown HRD status; 4 pts had a deleterious BRCA1/2 alteration. Median time on treatment was 54 d (range, 2–224). There were no confirmed responses. Of 96 evaluable pts, 27 (28.1%) had a best response of SD; CBR was 12.5% and median PFS was 1.8 mo. No relationship was observed between HRD status and clinical activity. Treatment was discontinued by 93 pts (95.9%), mainly due to radiologic or clinical progression (73.1%). Most frequent any grade treatment-emergent (any cause) adverse events were asthenia/fatigue (n=56, 57.7%), nausea (n=40, 41.2%), and anemia (n=34, 35.1%). Conclusions: Single agent rucaparib did not show activity in pts with previously treated advanced UC and enrollment was suspended at the first interim analysis. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in pts with ovarian cancer. Next generation sequencing–based characterization of the genomic landscape of mUC will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03397394.

Changes in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and systemic therapy outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A multicenter retrospective analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 346-346
Author(s):  
Andrea Grace Bocobo ◽  
Paige M. Bracci ◽  
Anna Parks ◽  
Lindsay Marie Hannan ◽  
Kelly Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Multiple Treatment ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Clinical Covariates ◽  
Multicenter Analysis

346 Background: AFP is elevated in 70% of HCC and is associated with poor prognosis. The role of AFP as a biomarker of response to systemic treatments has not been established, though small, retrospective studies show association between AFP decline and survival on sorafenib. The relationship between AFP changes and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has not been reported. This study examines AFP changes on treatment for association with outcomes on first-line (1L) SOR and any subsequent CPI in a contemporary, multicenter U.S. population. Methods: Design: Multicenter retrospective case series. Key eligibility: Received 1L SOR or SOR-based combination for advanced HCC; ≥ 1 post-treatment AFP value available; enrolled on IRB-approved registry. Objectives: associate AFP changes within 3 months of start of treatment with overall survival (OS) and time on treatment (TOT) on 1L SOR and any subsequent CPI; associate baseline AFP with OS and TOT for SOR and CPI; relate baseline AFP and changes on treatment to clinical covariates. Results: 152 patients were identified from two centers. Baseline characteristics: M/F 132/20; HBV/HCV/nonviral 40/71/41; Child Pugh A/B 128/23; BCLC A/B/C: 4/15/133. Baseline AFP < 20/ ≥ 400: 43/59. 43 received CPI after SOR. See Table. Baseline AFP was not related to TOT or OS for SOR or CPI. Multivariable analyses for AFP with clinical covariates will be presented. Conclusions: This series is the largest multicenter analysis of AFP response to systemic therapy with SOR and CPI. AFP decrease and increase within the first 3 months of treatment with SOR and CPI were inversely and significantly associated with median OS. AFP warrants further study in randomized cohorts as a biomarker of response to systemic therapy in HCC, now with multiple treatment options available at progression.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Single-Agent Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Resistance to EGFR-TKI

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyi Deng ◽  
Xinqing Lin ◽  
Xiaohong Xie ◽  
Yilin Yang ◽  
Liqiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Single Agent Chemotherapy ◽  
Egfr Tkis

PurposePlatinum-based chemotherapy remains the classic treatment option for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress while receiving treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). In this study, we analyzed real-world outcomes of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with platinum-free chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC after developing resistance to EGFR-TKIs.MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with mutation-positive NSCLC after developing resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Patients who received chemotherapy alone plus ICIs with or without anti-angiogenic drugs (cohort A) or platinum-based chemotherapy (cohort B) between February 2019 and August 2020 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, EGFR mutation status, response to therapy, and adverse events (AEs) were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsSeventeen patients were eligible and included in the analysis, including 8 in cohort A and 9 in cohort B. After a median follow-up of 7.6 months, the median progression-free survival was 6.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.1 to 7.0] in cohort A and 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.3–5.8) in cohort B (hazard ratios, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05–0.93; P = 0.039). The overall response and disease control rates were 50% and 100% in cohort A, and 22% and 89% in cohort B, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 25% of the patients in cohort A and in 33.3% of the patients in cohort B.ConclusionICIs plus platinum-free, single-agent chemotherapy provides promising progression-free survival and overall response rate benefit, along with a low rate of severe AEs in patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant advanced NSCLC.

scholarly journals Impact of Pathological Stratification on the Clinical Outcomes of Advanced Well-Differentiated/Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Treated with Trabectedin

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1453
Author(s):  
Chiara Fabbroni ◽  
Giovanni Fucà ◽  
Francesca Ligorio ◽  
Elena Fumagalli ◽  
Marta Barisella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
The Impact

Background. We previously showed that grading can prognosticate the outcome of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LPS). In the present study, we aimed to explore the impact of pathological stratification using grading on the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced well-differentiated LPS (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS) treated with trabectedin. Patients: We included patients with advanced WDLPS and DDLPS treated with trabectedin at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori between April 2003 and November 2019. Tumors were categorized in WDLPS, low-grade DDLPS, and high-grade DDLPS according to the 2020 WHO classification. Patients were divided in two cohorts: Low-grade (WDLPS/low-grade DDLPS) and high-grade (high-grade DDLPS). Results: A total of 49 patients were included: 17 (35%) in the low-grade cohort and 32 (65%) in the high-grade cohort. Response rate was 47% in the low-grade cohort versus 9.4% in the high-grade cohort (logistic regression p = 0.006). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.7 months in the low-grade cohort and 3.2 months in the high-grade cohort. Grading was confirmed as an independent predictor of PFS in the Cox proportional-hazards regression multivariable model (adjusted hazard ratio low-grade vs. high-grade: 0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.22–0.94; adjusted p = 0.035). Conclusions: In this retrospective case series, sensitivity to trabectedin was higher in WDLPS/low-grade DDLPS than in high-grade DDLPS. If confirmed in larger series, grading could represent an effective tool to personalize the treatment with trabectedin in patients with advanced LPS.

scholarly journals CTIM-15. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PHASE II STUDY OF NIVOLUMAB WITH HYPOFRACTIONATED RE-RADIATION AND BEVACIZUMAB FOR RECURRENT MGMT METHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii36-ii36
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Minesh Mehta ◽  
Alexandra Miller ◽  
Mariza Daras ◽  
Anna Piotrowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Significant Finding ◽  
Trial Treatment

Abstract Standard of standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) remains unsatisfactory with universal disease recurrence and a median survival of &lt; 2 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown limited single-agent activity in GBM thus far. GBMs with methylated MGMT promoter and no baseline corticosteroid dependence may be most likely to derive benefit from ICI. The combination of ICIs with radiation has shown promising activity in other human cancers. Combining nivolumab and re-RT/bevacizumab in GBM may augment ICI activity through immunogenic effects of radiation, may reduce the risk of radiation necrosis by addition of bevacizumab at the time of radiation, and may reduce the need for corticosteroids. In this multicenter phase II study, nivolumab is combined with re-irradiation and optional concurrent bevacizumab followed by nivolumab in patients with first recurrence of IDH-wildtype and MGMT methylated glioblastoma. Primary objective is to improve 1-year overall survival (OS) from 33 (based on EORTC 26101) to 50%. Nine-three patients are required to show a significant finding with an α of 0.05 and 81% power. Thirteen of 93 patient (14%) have been enrolled with a median age of 59 (range 42–71) with a median KPS of 90 (range 70–90). Treatment has been tolerated well without any grade ≥ 4 toxicities and only one grade 3 (amylase elevation). The most common adverse events were pruritus and hypothyroidism in 3/13 (23%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) is 7 months with a 6months PFS of 55.6%. The 12months OS is 66.7%. Patients with recurrent MGMT methylated, IDH-wildtype glioblastoma tolerate trial treatment with acceptable toxicities. Clinical efficacy in the first patients enrolled shows a promising effect. Enrollment is ongoing.

scholarly journals Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidhya Karivedu ◽  
Ihab Eldessouki ◽  
Ahmad Taftaf ◽  
Zheng Zhu ◽  
Abouelmagd Makramalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Study Results

Background. Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is associated with a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 4–15 months. Despite new insights into the genetic and molecular background of MUM, satisfactory systemic treatment approaches are currently lacking. The study results of innovative treatment strategies are urgently needed. Patients and Methods. This was a retrospective case series of 8 patients with MUM managed at the University of Cincinnati between January 2015 and January 2018. The immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) 1.1 criteria were used for patient evaluation, and magnetic resonance imaging was used for evaluation at treatment checkpoints. Objective. To assess the clinical outcome of patients with MUM treated with a combination of checkpoint inhibitors. Results. The series included eight patients, six men and two women, with MUM. Their median age at MUM diagnosis was 69 (range, 55–77) years. All patients were treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination along with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), followed by nivolumab maintenance and monthly TACE procedures. The majority of patients had a partial response or stable disease. Two of the patients had partial response, while four others had stable disease. Two other patients experienced disease progression. Conclusion. We report the outcomes of eight patients with MUM treated with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab. We report the clinical outcome and toxicity associated with this treatment approach. Further studies are warranted to explore immunotherapy in MUM. These findings support the consideration of immunotherapy in MUM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document