scholarly journals Profile of a Serial Killer: Cellular and Molecular Approaches to Study Individual Cytotoxic T-Cells following Therapeutic Vaccination

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuela M. Iancu ◽  
Petra Baumgaertner ◽  
Sébastien Wieckowski ◽  
Daniel E. Speiser ◽  
Nathalie Rufer

T-cell vaccination may prevent or treat cancer and infectious diseases, but further progress is required to increase clinical efficacy. Step-by-step improvements of T-cell vaccination in phase I/II clinical studies combined with very detailed analysis of T-cell responses at the single cell level are the strategy of choice for the identification of the most promising vaccine candidates for testing in subsequent large-scale phase III clinical trials. Major aims are to fully identify the most efficient T-cells in anticancer therapy, to characterize their TCRs, and to pinpoint the mechanisms of T-cell recruitment and function in well-defined clinical situations. Here we discuss novel strategies for the assessment of human T-cell responses, revealing in part unprecedented insight into T-cell biology and novel structural principles that govern TCR-pMHC recognition. Together, the described approaches advance our knowledge of T-cell mediated-protection from human diseases.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 749-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sattva S. Neelapu ◽  
Barry L. Gause ◽  
Linda Harvey ◽  
Andrea R. Frye ◽  
Jessie Horton ◽  
...  

Abstract The unique antigenic determinants (Idiotype [Id]) of the immunoglobulin expressed on a given B cell malignancy can serve as a tumor-specific antigen for active immunotherapy. We have previously demonstrated that Id vaccines in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients administered in the minimal residual disease (MRD) state are immunogenic and are associated with induction of complete molecular remissions and long-term disease-free survival (Nature Med 5:1171–1177, 1999). This hybridoma-derived vaccine is now being tested in a pivotal Phase III clinical trial. However, the production of Id protein by hybridoma technology for such vaccine formulation is an expensive and laborious process requiring an average of 3 to 6 months to manufacture the vaccine for each patient. To overcome this difficulty, we developed a novel vaccine formulation where we directly extracted the membrane proteins from lymph node biopsy-derived tumor cells and incorporated them into liposomes along with IL-2. Testing in preclinical studies showed this formulation to be as potent as our prototype hybridoma-derived Id protein vaccine. In the present study, 11 previously untreated and/or relapsed FL patients received 5 injections of this novel vaccine formulation subcutaneously and/or intratumorally at approximately monthly intervals. The vaccine was well tolerated and induced only minor local reactions at the sites of injection. T cell responses were evaluated by cytokine induction and IFNg ELISPOT against autologous tumor. Post-vaccine, but not pre-vaccine, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 6 out of 10 patients that were assessed, recognized autologous tumor cells, as demonstrated by TNFa, GM-CSF and/or IFNg production. Significant production of cytokines was observed only in response to autologous tumor cells, but not normal B cells. The precursor frequency of tumor-reactive T cells was significantly increased in postvaccine PBMC (range 19–115 IFNg spots/100,000 PBMC), compared with prevaccine PBMC (range 2–7 IFNg spots/100,000 PBMC). Anti-MHC Class I and Class II antibodies inhibited cytokine production suggesting that both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were involved in the anti-tumor immune responses. Vaccination was associated with induction of a sustained complete response in one patient and correlated with the generation of a potent anti-tumor T cell response. The remaining 10 patients progressed after a median duration of 8 months. We conclude that liposomal delivery of lymphoma membrane proteins is safe, induces tumor-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses, and may serve as a model for vaccine development against other human cancers. The induction of clinical response warrants further testing of this novel formulation in the setting of MRD where the immunosuppressive effects of the tumor are likely to be least.


1998 ◽  
Vol 87 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 94-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piet Stinissen ◽  
Jingwu Zhang ◽  
Caroline Vandevyver ◽  
Guy Hermans ◽  
Jef Raus

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Stampouloglou ◽  
Anthony Federico ◽  
Emily Slaby ◽  
Stefano Monti ◽  
Gregory L. Szeto ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTA major challenge for cancer immunotherapy is sustaining T cell activation and recruitment in immunosuppressive solid tumors. Here we report that Yap levels are sharply induced upon activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and that Yap functions as an immunosuppressive factor and inhibitor of effector differentiation. Loss of Yap in T cells results in enhanced T cell activation, differentiation and function, which translates in vivo to an improved ability for T cells to infiltrate and repress tumors. Gene expression analyses of tumor-infiltrating T cells following Yap deletion implicates Yap as a mediator of global T cell responses in the tumor microenvironment and as a key negative regulator of T cell tumor infiltration and patient survival in diverse human cancers. Collectively, our results indicate that Yap plays critical roles in T cell biology, and suggest that inhibiting Yap activity improves T cell responses in cancer.


2000 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 6826-6832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Russo ◽  
Natalia Kozlova ◽  
David L. Lakey ◽  
Douglas Kernodle

ABSTRACT Most studies of human T-cell responses in tuberculosis have focused on persons with either active disease or latent infection. Although this work has been critical in defining T-cell correlates of successful versus failed host containment, little is known about the development of Mycobacterium-specific T-cell responses in uninfected persons. To explore this issue, naive T cells from uninfected donors were sensitized in vitro with avirulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected autologous macrophages. T-cell lines primed in this manner proliferated and produced cytokines after challenge with mycobacterial antigens. Of 11 such lines, 8 were high Th1 responders, 2 were low Th1 responders, and 1 was a Th2 responder. Furthermore, similar patterns and magnitudes of proliferative and cytokine responses were seen when Mycobacterium infection-primed lines were challenged with recombinant antigen 85 (Ag85) proteins. The addition of interleukin 12 (IL-12) during the initial sensitization increased the magnitude of Th1 responses; however, antibody to IL-12 did not eliminate Th1 responses, suggesting that additional factors contributed to the differentiation of these cells. Finally, in the presence of IL-12, recombinant Ag85B was able to prime naive T cells for Th1 responses upon challenge with Mycobacterium-infected macrophages or Ag85B. Therefore, under the appropriate conditions, priming with whole bacteria or a subunit antigen can stimulateMycobacterium-specific Th1 effector cell development. Further definition of the antigens and conditions required to drive naive human T cells to differentiate into Th1 effectors should facilitate the development of an improved tuberculosis vaccine.


2021 ◽  
Vol 218 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhuang ◽  
Xiaomin Lai ◽  
Jing Sun ◽  
Zhao Chen ◽  
Zhaoyong Zhang ◽  
...  

Virus-specific T cells play essential roles in protection against multiple virus infections, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. While SARS-CoV-2–specific T cells have been identified in COVID-19 patients, their role in the protection of SARS-CoV-2–infected mice is not established. Here, using mice sensitized for infection with SARS-CoV-2 by transduction with an adenovirus expressing the human receptor (Ad5-hACE2), we identified SARS-CoV-2–specific T cell epitopes recognized by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Virus-specific T cells were polyfunctional and were able to lyse target cells in vivo. Further, type I interferon pathway was proved to be critical for generating optimal antiviral T cell responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection. T cell vaccination alone partially protected SARS-CoV-2–infected mice from severe disease. In addition, the results demonstrated cross-reactive T cell responses between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, but not MERS-CoV, in mice. Understanding the role of the T cell response will guide immunopathogenesis studies of COVID-19 and vaccine design and validation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 245-245
Author(s):  
Ravi Amrit Madan ◽  
Kwong Yok Tsang ◽  
Caroline Jochems ◽  
Jennifer L. Marte ◽  
Jo A Tucker ◽  
...  

245 Background: PSA-TRICOM is a vector-based therapeutic cancer vaccine designed to generate a targeted anti-tumor immune response against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–expressing tumor cells. Early clinical trials have evaluated the immunologic impact of this vaccine and demonstrated promising clinical activity. PSA-TRICOM is being evaluated in a phase III trial in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: We recently conducted a broad overview of both published and new data which analyzed the immune responses to PSA-TRICOM. Immune responses included ELISPOT for antigen-specific immune response and flow-cytometry analysis of peripheral immune cells. Results: 104 patients (pts) with prostate cancer were tested for T-cell responses and 59 out of 104 (57%) demonstrated a greater than or equal to 2-fold increase in PSA-specific T cells 4 weeks after vaccine. The responders had a median 5-fold increase relative to pre-vaccine levels. For most pts PSA-specific immune responses (likely memory cells) seen 28 days following the most recent vaccine are quantitatively similar to levels of circulating influenza-specific T cells in the same pts. In addition, 19 out of 28 pts (68%) evaluated demonstrated immune responses to tumor-associated antigens not present in the vaccine (antigen spreading). Since PSA-TRICOM is designed to generate a cellular (TH1 immune response), it is not surprising that 2 out of 349 pts (<1.0%) demonstrated evidence of PSA antibody induction following vaccine. This suggests that post-vaccine PSA kinetics were not affected by PSA antibodies. Conclusions: PSA-TRICOM has demonstrated the ability to generate immune responses. Despite these findings, it is important to note that systemic immune response to PSA may underestimate the true therapeutic immune response since it does not measure cells that trafficked to tumor or antigen spreading. Furthermore, while the entire PSA gene is the vaccine, only one epitope of PSA is specifically evaluated in the T-cell responses. Further immune analysis continues in an ongoing phase III of PSA-TRICOM in mCRPC (NCT01322490), accruing worldwide, and two trials combining PSA-TRICOM with enzalutamide (biochemical recurrence/ NCT01875250 and mCRPC/ NCT01867333) currently accruing at NCI. Clinical trial information: multiple trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document