scholarly journals Relational Aggression in Preschool Students: An Exploration of the Variables of Sex, Age, and Siblings

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Morine ◽  
Laura M. Crothers ◽  
James B. Schreiber ◽  
Jered B. Kolbert ◽  
Tammy L. Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aggressive Behavior ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Teacher Assessment ◽  
Peer Ratings ◽  
Factorial Anova ◽  
Preschool Students ◽  
Relationally Aggressive ◽  
Sibling Interaction ◽  
Older Siblings

In this study, researchers wished to ascertain whether there were age (three- and four-year old), sibling (with or without older siblings), and sex (male and female) differences in the use of relational aggression in preschool students as rated by peers and teachers. In order to answer this research question, two 2 × 2 × 2 factorial ANOVA procedures with the relational aggression composite score as the dependent variable on the PSBS-P and PSBS-T were used for peer and teacher assessment, respectively, of relational aggression. Results revealed that in the peer ratings of preschool students' relationally aggressive behavior, there was an disordinal age by sibling interaction, in which four-year-old children with siblings were significantly more likely to be rated by their peers as using relational aggression than three-year-old children without siblings. In the teacher ratings of preschool students' relationally aggressive behavior, a main effect for age was observed. Teachers rated four-year old children as evidencing significantly higher levels of relational aggression as compared to three-year-olds. No sex differences were observed in the use of relational aggression either at age three or age four in this sample. Implications for these findings are presented.

scholarly journals Physical and Relational Aggressive Behavior in Preschool: School Teacher Rating, Teachers’ Perception and İntervention Strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Esra Dereli
Keyword(s):  
Aggressive Behavior ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Preschool Teachers ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
School Teacher ◽  
Teacher Rating ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Intervention Strategies ◽  
School Teachers ◽  
Preschool Students

In this study was aimed to determine the preschool teachers’ perception and intervention strategies of physical, relational aggressive behavior and investigate the whether preschool students’ this aggressive behavior differ based on preschool teachers’ intervention strategies. Sample group consisted of 42 pre-school teachers and 755 preschool students aged 4-5. Sequential explanatory design of explanatory design model, one of the mixed method designs, was used in the study. In the quantitative part of study relational screening model and the qualitive part of study semi-structured interview was used to assess teachers’ perception and intervention. Personal Information Form, Pre-School Social Behavior Scale-Teacher Form, and Teacher Interview Forms were used to collect data. Analysis of data was used descriptive statistics, One Way Anova analysis. Results indicated that children’s physical and relational aggressive behavior scores significantly differed preschool teachers’ intervention strategies of aggressive behavior. According to the results, moderate level meaningful relationships between teachers’ preschool teachers’ intervention strategies of physical, relational aggressive behavior and students’ physical and relational aggressive behavior. Teachers stated that they tried different ways to intervention strategies these problems. However, it was determined that pre-school teachers used the strategy of prohibition and punishment in physical aggression more than relational aggression.

Associations between multisystem stress reactivity and peer nominated aggression in early childhood vary by sex

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1888-1898
Author(s):  
Melissa J. Hagan ◽  
Danielle S. Roubinov ◽  
W. Thomas Boyce ◽  
Nicole R. Bush
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Physical Aggression ◽  
Stress Reactivity ◽  
Physiological Stress ◽  
Kindergarten Children ◽  
Peer Ratings ◽  
Cortisol Reactivity ◽  
Physiological Stress Response

AbstractThere is emerging evidence that the development of problematic aggression in childhood may be associated with specific physiological stress response patterns, with both biological overactivation and underactivation implicated. This study tested associations between sex-specific patterns of stress responses across the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and peer nominations of aggression among 271 kindergarten children (Mean age = 5.32 years; 52% Female; 44% White). Upon entry to kindergarten, children participated in a multidomain standardized stress paradigm. Changes in pre-ejection period (PEP) and salivary cortisol were assessed. On a separate day, children provided peer ratings of physical and relational aggression in a standardized interview. As expected, there was a significant three-way interaction between PEP, cortisol reactivity, and sex, but only for physical aggression. Among boys, cortisol reactivity was positively associated with physical aggression only for those with higher SNS reactivity. Findings suggest that for boys, asymmetrical and symmetrical HPA/SNS reactivity may be associated with lower and higher risk for peer-directed physical aggression, respectively. Understanding the complex associations between multisystem physiology, child sex and peer-directed aggression in early childhood may offer insight into individual differences underlying the emergence of behavioral dysregulation in early peer contexts.

Relational Aggression in Sibling Relationships

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Campione-Barr ◽  
Sonia E. Giron ◽  
Christopher Odudu
Keyword(s):  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Physical Aggression ◽  
Sibling Relationships ◽  
Sibling Relationship ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Relationally Aggressive ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Developmental Course

Given the uniqueness of siblings, it is important to consider the presence and role of relational aggression within the sibling relationship. Due to the time spent together and the information disclosed between siblings, during conflict, such information could be used in threatening or relationally aggressive ways. Relationally aggressive actions do not pose a threat to end the sibling relationship, making it a safe relationship to practice such strategies. While parents are likely to be aware of physical aggression between siblings, and attempt to stop it, relational aggression may be difficult for parents to catch and address, reinforcing its effectiveness as a strategy of control. This chapter describes the developmental course of relational aggression within the sibling relationship, as well as associations between relational aggression in the sibling relationship and relationships with others. Finally, we highlight the conclusions and limitations of this research and offer ideas for future research directions.

Reciprocal relationships between sociometric indices of social status and aggressive behavior in children

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 963-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izaskun Orue ◽  
Esther Calvete
Keyword(s):  
Aggressive Behavior ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Peer Acceptance ◽  
Sociometric Status ◽  
Overt Aggression ◽  
Aggressive Behaviors ◽  
Reciprocal Relationships ◽  
Peer Nomination ◽  
Longitudinal Relationships

The goal of this study was to assess the reciprocal longitudinal relationships between sociometric status and aggressive behavior in children. Overt and relational aggressive behaviors were differentiated in order to study the diverse associations within peer acceptance and rejection. A total of 777 boys and girls from 8 to 12 years of age filled in peer nomination instruments to measure aggressive behavior and sociometric status. The results revealed that overt aggression at T1 led to rejection at T2. Furthermore, reciprocal relationships were found between rejection and overt aggressive behavior among boys but not among girls. Among girls, acceptance by peers at T1 predicted relational aggression at T2. Differences between boys' and girls' acceptance and rejection of their aggressive peers are also discussed.

scholarly journals Sibling Interaction and Symbolic Capital: Toward a Theory of Political Micro-economy

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad Nilep
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
Language Socialization ◽  
Symbolic Capital ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Sibling Interaction ◽  
Sibling Interactions ◽  
The Family ◽  
Linguistic Behavior ◽  
Older Siblings

Older siblings play a role in their younger siblings’ language socialization by ratifying or rejecting linguistic behavior. In addition, older siblings may engage in a struggle to maintain their dominant position in the family hierarchy. This struggle is seen through the lens of language and political economy as a struggle for symbolic capital. Bilingual adolescent sibling interactions are analyzed as expressions both of identity and of symbolic power. This paper draws a theory of political micro-economy, which relates face-to-face interaction to larger structures of political economy through a process of fractal recursivity.

The Peer Nature of Relational Aggression

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene J. Sandstrom
Keyword(s):  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Social Constructs ◽  
Peer Experiences ◽  
Relationally Aggressive ◽  
Peer Dynamics ◽  
Core Questions ◽  
Aggressive Children ◽  
Peer Liking ◽  
Group Acceptance

Relational aggression (RA), which involves the manipulation of a target’s relationships, peer status, or reputation, is an inherently interpersonal weapon. This chapter focuses on the peer context of RA, and addresses core questions about the association between RA and social constructs such as group acceptance, rejection, popularity, and friendship. What are the interpersonal costs and benefits of RA? What factors might explain why some relationally aggressive children are able to achieve and maintain popularity and social centrality despite being disliked? How does RA play out within mutual friendships? And how do the peer dynamics surrounding RA shift across development? The chapter begins with a discussion of RA in relation to group-level peer experiences (i.e., peer liking/acceptance; disliking/rejection; perceived popularity) and then turns to an exploration of RA within the context of friendships. It concludes with a discussion of selection and influence effects in regard to relationally aggressive behavior.

Cultural Contexts of Relational Aggression

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Kawabata
Keyword(s):  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Peer Relationships ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Cultural Influences ◽  
Future Research ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Cultural Contexts ◽  
Peer Socialization ◽  
Relationally Aggressive ◽  
Aggressive Children

Theories and models suggest cultural influences on children’s family and peer socialization. It is conceivable, therefore, that the development of relational aggression, which is a part of developmentally salient social experiences, may appear differently, depending on cultural contexts. The goal of this chapter is to summarize cross-cultural, international studies that have examined the development of relational aggression in various cultural contexts. Specifically, studies are reviewed that have evaluated psychometric properties of measures and have explored social-cognitive processes, peer relationships, victimization experiences, and psychopathology among relationally aggressive children and adolescents across cultures. Finally, developmental and clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Increased aggressive behavior among youth in the United States who have experienced multiple forms of victimization

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tammy B. Pham ◽  
Nallammai Muthiah ◽  
Andrew Adesman
Keyword(s):  
Aggressive Behavior ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Cell Phone ◽  
The United States ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Physical Assault ◽  
Aggressive Behaviors ◽  
Multiple Forms ◽  
Cyber Aggression ◽  
Internet Harassment

Abstract Objective Victims of peer aggression, categorized broadly as face-to-face aggression (FA) and/or cyber-aggression (CA), are themselves at elevated risk for perpetrating aggressive behavior against others. Studies to date have not formally examined whether experiencing multiple forms of FA or CA is associated with even further increased likelihood of aggressive behavior towards others. Methods Data from the 2014 National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence III were analyzed for youth aged 10–17. Based on self-report responses regarding past-year experience, two broad victimization categories were defined: FA (verbal/relational aggression and/or physical assault/intimidation and/or property victimization) and CA (Internet harassment and/or cell-phone harassment). Logistic regression adjusting for age, sex and race/ethnicity compared victim sub-groups against corresponding non-victims with respect to self-report of aggressive behaviors towards others. Results The sample (n = 1959) was 51.3% male and 77.5% White; 39.6% reported >1 form of FA and 7.9% reported >1 form of CA. Whereas victims of physical assault/intimidation or property damage were more likely than non-victims to perpetrate aggression [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.44 and 5.17, respectively), victims of both were strikingly at greatest risk (aOR = 20.29). Similarly, victims of Internet harassment or cell-phone harassment were more likely than non-victims to perpetrate aggression (aORs = 6.18 and 9.40, respectively), while victims of both were even more likely (aOR = 15.32). Students who experienced >1 form of both FA and CA were the most likely to engage in aggressive behaviors (aOR = 38.03). Conclusion Victims of multiple forms of FA or CA are more likely to perpetrate aggression compared to non-victims and those victimized in fewer ways.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document