scholarly journals Confirmed Activity and Tolerability of Weekly Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Advanced Angiosarcoma

Sarcoma ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaetano Apice ◽  
Antonio Pizzolorusso ◽  
Massimo Di Maio ◽  
Giovanni Grignani ◽  
Vittorio Gebbia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Small Series ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Pretreated Patients

Background.In several prospective and retrospective studies, weekly paclitaxel showed promising activity in patients with angiosarcoma.Patients and Methods. Our study was originally designed as a prospective, phase II multicenter trial for patients younger than 75, with ECOG performance status 0–2, affected by locally advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma. Patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2intravenously, at days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response.Results. Eight patients were enrolled but, due to very slow accrual, the trial was prematurely stopped and further 10 patients were retrospectively included in the analysis. Out of 17 evaluable patients, 6 patients obtained an objective response (5 partial, 1 complete), with an objective response rate of 35% (95% confidence interval 17%–59%). Of note, five responses were obtained in pretreated patients. In the paper, details of overall survival, progression-free survival, and tolerability are reported.Conclusions. In this small series of patients with locally advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma, weekly paclitaxel was confirmed to be well tolerated and active even in pretreated patients.

Safety and efficacy of pazopanib in heavily pretreated and treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A single center experience of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15090-e15090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Schmidinger ◽  
Marija Bojic ◽  
Ursula Maria Vogl ◽  
Christoph Klingler ◽  
Gero Kramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
University Of Vienna ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Medical University

e15090 Background: Treatment with pazopanib was shown to improve objective response rates (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) when compared to placebo in treatment-naïve or cytokine-pretreated patients with mRCC. We assessed the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in an unselected group of mRCC-patients at the Medical University of Vienna. Methods: Medical records of all patients who were treated with pazopanib between June 2010 and January 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Pazopanib was prescribed at a dose of 800 mg daily. Treatment was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ORR was assessed by RECIST criteria. PFS and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the first day of pazopanib until progression and/or death, respectively. Results: Forty patients with a median age of 69 years (range 47-82) are currently evaluable for this analysis. The majority of patients (61%) presented with an ECOG Performance status of 0 and were classified as intermediate risk (55%) according to the MSKCC risk group classification. All patients had undergone nephrectomy and the majority (75%) had predominantly clear cell tumors. Most of the patients (66%) were diagnosed with three or more metastatic sites. Eighty percent of the patients were heavily pretreated, most commonly with three or more different types of targeted agents. Eight patients (20%) received pazopanib in first-line. Objective remission and disease stabilization were observed in 27% and 30% of the entire population. PFS and OS were 5 months (95%CI 3.07-6.86) and not reached, respectively. The most commonly observed all grade toxicities included fatigue (97%), anorexia (78%), hypertension (82%), diarrhoea (73%), nausea (62%) and vomiting (54%). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were fatigue (68%), hypertension (47%) and diarrhoea (29%). Conclusions: Pazopanib appears effective in the setting of extensively pretreated patients. A later stage of the disease might have led to the unexpected higher incidence of off-target side effects such as fatigue and gastro-intestinal symptoms.

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Real-world efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a study by the Korean Cancer Study Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591987112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Hyeon-Su Im ◽  
Kyu-pyo Kim ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

Background: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy in the global NAPOLI-1 trial. Real-world data may further clarify the outcomes and safety profile of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice. Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients with mPAC who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine-based therapy under a Managed Access Program in Korea. Results: From January 2017 to April 2018, 86 patients across 10 institutions received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV (median age, 61 years; 60% male; ECOG performance status, 0–1). A total of 35 (41%) and 51 (59%) patients had received less than two and two or more lines of chemotherapy before inclusion, respectively. At a median follow up of 6.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.4–11.4) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.3–5.7). Six-month OS and PFS rates were 65.1% and 37.5%, respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 10% and 55%, respectively. Most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (37.2%), nausea (10.5%), vomiting (9.3%), anorexia (8.1%) and diarrhoea (4.7%). Conclusion: Real-life data for Korean patients indicate that, consistent with NAPOLI-1, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is effective and well-tolerated in patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

A randomized phase III study of gemcitabine (G) versus GV1001 in sequential combination with G in patients with unresectable and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4601-4601 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Buanes ◽  
J. Maurel ◽  
W. Liauw ◽  
M. Hebbar ◽  
J. Nemunaitis
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Peptide Vaccine ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Delayed Treatment ◽  
Sequential Combination ◽  
The Impact

4601 Background: A phase I/II study with GV1001, a telomerase peptide vaccine, showed a median overall survival (OS) of 8.6 months in non-resectable PC (Bernhardt SL et al, Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1474–1482). This phase III trial was conducted to determine the impact on overall survival of G monotherapy vs. GV1001 in sequential combination with G in unresectable and metastatic PC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had chemotherapy-naive, advanced PC and ECOG performance status 0–1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive arm A: G (1,000 mg/m2 30 min i.v.) weekly for 7 weeks (w), 1w off and then 3w during 4-weekly cycles, or arm B: GV1001 0.56 mg s.c. plus GM-CSF as immune adjuvant on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 15, 22, 36, then every 4 weeks. Patients who progressed clinically or radiologically during GV1001 continued on GV1001 and concomitant gemcitabine. CT scans were performed every 8 weeks. The primary end-point was OS. A sample size of 520 patients allowed the detection of a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.73 (B/A), with 2α = 0.05 and 90% power. Results: Between June 2006 and May 2008, 365 pts were enrolled (A / B; 182 / 183). The study was stopped prematurely due to a preliminary analysis with 178 events showing no survival benefit of GV1001. Pts were well balanced for baseline characteristics: male 59.3% / 62.8%; median age 61y / 61y; ECOG PS 0 34.3% / 36.7%; locally advanced 22.4% / 20.7%. As of August 2008, 238 pts (A / B : 114 / 124) had died. Median OS was 7.3 / 5.9 months (HR 0.8; 95% CI 0.6–1.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 / 1.9 months (HR 0.5; 95%CI 0.4–0.7). Grade 3–4 AEs: gastrointestinal 6% / 8%, infection 5% / 5%, vascular disorders 2% / 3%, neutropenia 6% / 3%. Conclusions: GV1001 did not show efficacy in sequential combination with G in advanced PC. The advantage of G monotherapy over the sequential combination may be due to the delayed treatment with G in arm B. [Table: see text]

Docetaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy in combination with cetuximab in patients with locally advanced or metastasized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Interim results of the nonrandomized phase II study TaxErb

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19062-e19062
Author(s):  
J. R. Fischer ◽  
F. Griesinger ◽  
T. Fink ◽  
E. Buchholz ◽  
T. Salm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Partial Remission ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Benefit Risk Assessment

e19062 Background: Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin-docetaxel has been shown to be effective and safe for patients with locally advanced or metastasized NSCLC. The monoclonal anti-EGRF antibody cetuximab has the potential to improve response rates and survival without a substantial increase in toxicity when given in combination with chemotherapy. Methods: Open, non-controlled phase II study with a planned sample size of 70 pts. Pts with locally advanced or metastasized NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 2 and no prior systemic chemotherapy were treated with carboplatin AUC5 (d 1) q4w for 4–6 cycles and docetaxel 35 mg/m2 (d1, 8, 15) q4w; cetuximab 400 / 250 mg/m2 (d 1) q1w until progression or intolerable toxicity (12 month max.). The primary endpoint was response rate defined as complete or partial remission according to RECIST. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, 1 year survival, median and progression free survival. Results: Subject of the interims analysis were 27 pts (25 stage IV, 2 stage IIIb). ECOG 0/1/2 was 33.3%/59.3%/3.7% (1 no data). 63% had prior surgery, 93% prior radiotherapy and all had adjuvant or inductive chemotherapy. Pts received a mean of 3 ± 1.4 cycles docetaxel-carboplatin-cetuximab. 49 adverse events were grade 1–2 and 12 grade 3–5. Skin toxicity (49%; 95%CI: 30%-68%; 41% G1/2, 8% G3/4), dyspnoea (35%; 95%CI: 17%-53%) and diarrhoea (23%; 95%CI: 7 %-39%; 19% G1/2, 4% G3) were most frequent. 11 pts (41%) had toxicity leading to dose reduction. 0 pts had complete and 11 pts had partial remission resulting in a response rate of 40.7% (95%CI: 22%-59%) based on intention to treat. 6 pts had stable disease (22.2%; 95%CI: 7%-38%). 5 pts were not evaluable for response. Conclusions: The combination of carboplatin-docetaxel-cetuximab has an overall acceptable tolerability. With a preliminary response rate of 40.7% the benefit risk assessment was found to be favourable and the study was continued. [Table: see text]

Bevacizumab in combination with first-line metastatic chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from the cohort study EOLE.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18005-e18005
Author(s):  
Christos Chouaid ◽  
Roland Schott ◽  
Lionel Falchero ◽  
Franck Bonnetain ◽  
Julien Neaume ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Large Cell Carcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Chi2 Test

e18005 Background: EOLE, a large cohort of 423 patients included in 1 year (July 2010 – July 2010) with locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC, aimed to describe the targeted population receiving first-line bevacizumab (Bev) in addition to chemotherapy with regards to progression-free survival, overall survival, safety and quality of life in real clinical practice. Methods: Patients who received physician’s choice of 1st-line Bev-containing treatment were included in this cohort study. Results: This analysis describes the inclusion data of 417 patients consisting of adenocarcinoma (92%), large cell carcinoma (4%), undifferentiated carcinoma in predominantly non-squamous (3%), bronchoalveolar carcinoma (1%). Patient characteristics were as follow: the median age being 60 (years) [32; 84], more males than females (68%), 40% had a baseline ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0, 47% of PS 1 and 12% of PS 2, most patients had Stage IV disease (91%), 13% of patients had never smoked. Tumor location was reported as central for 17% of patents and among them 4% was in contact with the large vessels. For 3% of the lesions a cavitation was notified; and 20% of included patients had brain metastases. The main comorbidities at the inclusion were: cardiovascular (45%), arterial thromboembolic and /or venous (20%) with pulmonary embolism (3%); related to the tumor lesion - bloody sputum (4%) and hemoptysis (1%). 68% of patients have received the dose of Bev 7.5mg/kg q3w; for 49% of patients Bev was combined with cisplatin/pemetrexed, 24% with carboplatin/paclitaxel, 13% with carboplatin/pemetrexed and 7% with cisplatin/gemcitabine. The EGFR mutation analysis was carried out for about 50% of patients. Conclusions: Compared to AVAil and SAil studies, EOLE cohort included more patients classified as having: a baseline PS of 2 (p <0.0001, Fisher test), a never smoked status (p<0.0001, chi2 test) and an adenocarcinoma (92%) (p<0.0001, chi2 test). Around a half of included patients received combination Bev - cisplatin /pemetrexed.

Cisplatin (CDDP) and radiation versus cetuximab (Cx) and radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (SCHNC): A retrospective review.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16009-e16009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Peddi ◽  
Runhua Shi ◽  
Lori Panu ◽  
Fred Ampil ◽  
Cherie-Ann Nathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Group A

e16009 Background: SCHNC is a common malignancy and approximately 60% of patients present with locally advanced disease. There is paucity of data directly comparing Cx and CDDP with concurrent radiation in locally advanced SCHNC. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients treated with CDDP and/or Cx along with radiation in locally advanced SCHNC comparing efficacy and outcomes in an academic cancer center. Methods: Ninety-five patients with locally advanced SCHNC were treated with concurrent CDDP (100 mg/m2 day 1, 22, 43) or Cx (400mg/m2 on day -7 and 250mg/m2 weekly) at our institution between January 2006 and June 2011. Forty-four patients were treated with CDDP (group A), 24 with Cx (group B) and 27 were initially started on CDDP but were switched to Cx secondary to toxicity (group C). All patients received concurrent radiation treatments (66-70 Gy, 2.0 Gy/fraction). The selection of CDDP versus Cx was largely based on ECOG performance status (PS) and baseline renal function of the patients. Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and log-rank test was used for analysis. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics except for mean age of 61, 56 and 55 years in group A, B and C respectively; T4 tumors consisted of 44%, 75% and 41% in groups A, B and C respectively. Groups A, B and C had a combined ECOG 0 and I (PS) of 93%, 75% and 92%. Patients with ECOG III PS were excluded. Results: Oropharynx was the most common treated site (38%) followed by Larynx (35%). Complete response (CR) was seen in 77%, 17% and 67% in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.001). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 16.6, 4.3 and 22.8 in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.001) and median overall survival (OS) was >35, 11.6 and >32 months in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Concurrent CDDP with radiation leads to better response rate PFS and OS as opposed to Cx though many patients treated with CDDP could not complete treatment due to toxicity. Randomized trial comparing the two should be considered.

Phase II efficacy and safety study of nintedanib versus sunitinib in previously untreated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4506-4506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Eisen ◽  
Yaroslav Shparyk ◽  
Robert Jones ◽  
Nicholas James MacLeod ◽  
Graham Temple ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Interval Change ◽  
First Line Therapy

4506 Background: Sunitinib (S) is established as a standard first-line therapy for patients (pts) with advanced RCC. However, treatment can be limited by the occurrence of drug-related adverse events (AEs). This Phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of nintedanib (N) – a potent, triple angiokinase inhibitor of VEGFR-1–3, PDGFR-α/β, and FGFR-1–3, as well as RET and Flt3 – vs S in previously untreated pts with RCC. Methods: Ninety-nine eligible pts (96 of whom were treated) with advanced, unresectable/recurrent clear cell RCC, an ECOG performance status of 0–1, and no prior systemic therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive N 200 mg twice daily (n=64; given in 4-week cycles) or S 50 mg once daily (n=32; 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off schedule). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable drug-related AEs. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival at 9 months (PFS-9) and, in N-treated pts only, QTc interval change (baseline to day 15). Secondary endpoints included PFS, objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF), and AEs. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between the arms. PFS-9 was not statistically significantly different between N- and S-treated pts (43 vs 45%; p=0.85). There were also no statistically significant differences between N and S with regard to PFS (median: 8.44 vs 8.38 mo; hazard ratio: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.71–1.89; p=0.56), confirmed ORR (18.8 vs 31.3%; p=0.19), OS (median: 20.37 vs 21.22 mo; p=0.63), TTP (median: 8.48 vs 8.54 mo; p=0.52), and TTF (median: 8.41 vs 8.36 mo; p=0.46). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 47% of N-treated pts and 56% of S-treated pts. Common AEs (all grades; N vs S) included diarrhea (61 vs 50%), nausea (38 vs 34%), fatigue (both 25%), and vomiting (16 vs 22%). Dermatologic AEs (8 vs 47%) were less frequent with N than S. There was no increase from baseline in QTc >60 ms on days 1 or 15 in N-treated pts, and there was no relationship between N exposure and QT interval change. Conclusions: N demonstrated similar efficacy to S and had a manageable safety profile, including a lower incidence of dermatologic AEs vs S. In addition, N was not associated with QT prolongation. Clinical trial information: NCT01024920.

Phase II study of pazopanib with weekly paclitaxel in refractory urothelial cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 294-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Sujata Narayanan ◽  
Lauren Christine Harshman ◽  
Russell Kent Pachynski ◽  
Anthony P. Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

294 Background: Currently, there are no standard treatments for relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC). Discouraging results have been observed in trials evaluating established chemotherapeutics as single agents or in combination regimens. Paclitaxel has moderate activity when used alone and in combination in UC. Pazopanib is active in other solid tumors secondary to its potent anti-angiogenic effects. We report the results of a multi-center phase II study evaluating the combination of paclitaxel with pazopanib in refractory UC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had histologically confirmed UC, with disease that progressed on upto 2 chemotherapeutic regimens. Pazopanib (800 mg) was administered daily, with weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) for 3 weeks in a 28 day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the study was response-rate (RR) based on RECISTv 1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints included safety, and progression free-survival (PFS). Results: From April 2010 to September 2014, 32 patients were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (29-89) and median ECOG performance status was 1 (0-2). 17 pts (54%) had UC of the upper urinary tract disease and 15(47%) had primary bladder tumors. All pts had multiple metastatic sites, including 9 (28%) with liver metastases. Median number of prior cytotoxic regimens was 2, and 50% were considered cisplatin responsive. Objective responses were observed in 58% with 3 (12%) complete responses (CR), and 12 pts (46%) with partial responses (PR). Another 9 (35%) acheived stable disease (SD). High grade toxicities included grade 3 hypertension (n=2), grade 3 fatigue (n=4), grade 3 thrombosis (n=2) and grade 4 neutropenia (n=2). Nearly half of the patients( n= 14 ) required growth factor support. Conclusions: Our phase II study combining paclitaxel and pazopanib demonstratedsignificant anti-tumor activity in relapsed/refractory UC. This combination is safe, effective and is worthy of evaluation in randomized phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT01108055.

KEYNOTE-224: Phase II study of pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS504-TPS504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Stephen L. Chan ◽  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Previously Treated

TPS504 Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib is the standard of care for first-line hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For patients with HCC after disease progression on sorafenib or for those with intolerance to sorafenib, no approved therapies are available. Because HCC is often driven by inflammation and is also associated with a suppressed immunoenvironment, there is a strong rationale to evaluate immunotherapy in patients with this type of cancer. The single-arm, multisite, phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02702414) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti–PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced HCC. Methods: Approximately 100 patients will be enrolled. Inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease or BCLC stage B disease not amenable to or refractory to locoregional therapy, and disease not amenable to a curative treatment approach (eg, transplantation, surgery, or ablation). Patients must also have measurable disease based on RECIST v1.1 as confirmed by central imaging vendor review, documented objective radiographic progression after stopping treatment with sorafenib or intolerance to sorafenib, Child-Pugh liver score A, ECOG performance status 0-1, and predicted life expectancy > 3 months. Patients will be allocated to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (~2 years) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision. Response will be assessed every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Adverse events (AEs) will be assessed throughout treatment and for 30 days thereafter (90 days for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. The primary end point is objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Secondary end points are overall survival; safety and tolerability; and duration of response, disease control rate, time to progression, and progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1 by central imaging vendor review. Enrollment in KEYNOTE-224 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document