scholarly journals Evaluation and Correction of Quantitative Precipitation Forecast by Storm-Scale NWP Model in Jiangsu, China

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaili Wang ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Ji Yang ◽  
Liping Liu
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Structure Amplitude ◽  
Verification Method ◽  
Amplitude Correction ◽  
Regional Prediction ◽  
Nwp Model

With the development of high-performance computer systems and data assimilation techniques, storm-scale numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are gradually used for short-term deterministic forecasts. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and correct precipitation forecasts of a storm-scale NWP model called the advanced regional prediction system (ARPS). The evaluation and correction consider five heavy precipitation events that occurred in the summer of 2015 in Jiangsu, China. The performances of the original and corrected ARPS precipitation forecasts are evaluated as a function of lead time using standard measurements and a spatial verification method called Structure-Amplitude-Location (SAL). In general, the ARPS could not produce optimal forecasts for very short lead times, and the forecast accuracy improves with increasing lead time. The ARPS overestimates precipitation for all lead times, which is confirmed by large bias in many forecasts in the first and second quadrant of the diagram of SAL, especially at the 1 h lead time. The amplitude correction is performed by matching percentile values of the ARPS precipitation forecasts and observations for each lead time. Amplitude correction significantly improved the ARPS precipitation forecasts in terms of the considered performance indices of standard measures and A-component and S-component of SAL.

scholarly journals A Review of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts and Their Use in Short- to Medium-Range Streamflow Forecasting

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 713-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Cuo ◽  
Thomas C. Pagano ◽  
Q. J. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Forecast Lead Time ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts ◽  
Active Research ◽  
Nwp Model

Abstract Unknown future precipitation is the dominant source of uncertainty for many streamflow forecasts. Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models can be used to generate quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) to reduce this uncertainty. The usability and usefulness of NWP model outputs depend on the application time and space scales as well as forecast lead time. For streamflow nowcasting (very short lead times; e.g., 12 h), many applications are based on measured in situ or radar-based real-time precipitation and/or the extrapolation of recent precipitation patterns. QPF based on NWP model output may be more useful in extending forecast lead time, particularly in the range of a few days to a week, although low NWP model skill remains a major obstacle. Ensemble outputs from NWP models are used to articulate QPF uncertainty, improve forecast skill, and extend forecast lead times. Hydrologic prediction driven by these ensembles has been an active research field, although operational adoption has lagged behind. Conversely, relatively little study has been done on the hydrologic component (i.e., model, parameter, and initial condition) of uncertainty in the streamflow prediction system. Four domains of research are identified: selection and evaluation of NWP model–based QPF products, improved QPF products, appropriate hydrologic modeling, and integrated applications.

scholarly journals Improving QPF by blending techniques at the Meteorological Service of Catalonia

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1443-1455 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Atencia ◽  
T. Rigo ◽  
A. Sairouni ◽  
J. Moré ◽  
J. Bech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Convective Structures ◽  
Prediction Horizon ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Correction Technique ◽  
Nwp Model

Abstract. The current operational very short-term and short-term quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) at the Meteorological Service of Catalonia (SMC) is made by three different methodologies: Advection of the radar reflectivity field (ADV), Identification, tracking and forecasting of convective structures (CST) and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models using observational data assimilation (radar, satellite, etc.). These precipitation forecasts have different characteristics, lead time and spatial resolutions. The objective of this study is to combine these methods in order to obtain a single and optimized QPF at each lead time. This combination (blending) of the radar forecast (ADV and CST) and precipitation forecast from NWP model is carried out by means of different methodologies according to the prediction horizon. Firstly, in order to take advantage of the rainfall location and intensity from radar observations, a phase correction technique is applied to the NWP output to derive an additional corrected forecast (MCO). To select the best precipitation estimation in the first and second hour (t+1 h and t+2 h), the information from radar advection (ADV) and the corrected outputs from the model (MCO) are mixed by using different weights, which vary dynamically, according to indexes that quantify the quality of these predictions. This procedure has the ability to integrate the skill of rainfall location and patterns that are given by the advection of radar reflectivity field with the capacity of generating new precipitation areas from the NWP models. From the third hour (t+3 h), as radar-based forecasting has generally low skills, only the quantitative precipitation forecast from model is used. This blending of different sources of prediction is verified for different types of episodes (convective, moderately convective and stratiform) to obtain a robust methodology for implementing it in an operational and dynamic way.

scholarly journals Eastern U.S. Verification of Ensemble Precipitation Forecasts

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjib Sharma ◽  
Ridwan Siddique ◽  
Nicholas Balderas ◽  
Jose D. Fuentes ◽  
Seann Reed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ensemble Forecast ◽  
Spatial Aggregation ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Eastern United States ◽  
Skill Scores

Abstract The quality of ensemble precipitation forecasts across the eastern United States is investigated, specifically, version 2 of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Ensemble Forecast System Reforecast (GEFSRv2) and Short Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF) system, as well as NCEP’s Weather Prediction Center probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecast (WPC-PQPF) guidance. The forecasts are verified using multisensor precipitation estimates and various metrics conditioned upon seasonality, precipitation threshold, lead time, and spatial aggregation scale. The forecasts are verified, over the geographic domain of each of the four eastern River Forecasts Centers (RFCs) in the United States, by considering first 1) the three systems or guidance, using a common period of analysis (2012–13) for lead times from 1 to 3 days, and then 2) GEFSRv2 alone, using a longer period (2004–13) and lead times from 1 to 16 days. The verification results indicate that, across the eastern United States, precipitation forecast bias decreases and the skill and reliability improve as the spatial aggregation scale increases; however, all the forecasts exhibit some underforecasting bias. The skill of the forecasts is appreciably better in the cool season than in the warm one. The WPC-PQPFs tend to be superior, in terms of the correlation coefficient, relative mean error, reliability, and forecast skill scores, than both GEFSRv2 and SREF, but the performance varies with the RFC and lead time. Based on GEFSRv2, medium-range precipitation forecasts tend to have skill up to approximately day 7 relative to sampled climatology.

scholarly journals The Effect of Upstream Convection on Downstream Precipitation

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly M. Mahoney ◽  
Gary M. Lackmann
Keyword(s):  
Moisture Transport ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cold Season ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Eta Model ◽  
Nwp Model

Abstract Operational forecasters in the southeast and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States have noted a positive quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) bias in numerical weather prediction (NWP) model forecasts downstream of some organized, cold-season convective systems. Examination of cold-season cases in which model QPF guidance exhibited large errors allowed identification of two representative cases for detailed analysis. The goals of the case study analyses are to (i) identify physical mechanisms through which the upstream convection (UC) alters downstream precipitation amounts, (ii) determine why operational models are challenged to provide accurate guidance in these situations, and (iii) suggest future research directions that would improve model forecasts in these situations and allow forecasters to better anticipate such events. Two primary scenarios are identified during which downstream precipitation is altered in the presence of UC for the study region: (i) a fast-moving convective (FC) scenario in which organized convective systems oriented parallel to the lower-tropospheric flow are progressive relative to the parent synoptic system, and appear to disrupt poleward moisture transport, and (ii) a situation characterized by slower-moving convection (SC) relative to the parent system. Analysis of a representative FC case indicated that moisture consumption, stabilization via convective overturning, and modification of the low-level flow to a more westerly direction in the postconvective environment all appear to contribute to the reduction of downstream precipitation. In the FC case, operational Eta Model forecasts moved the organized UC too slowly, resulting in an overestimate of downstream moisture transport. A 4-km explicit convection model forecast from the Weather Research and Forecasting model produced a faster-moving upstream convective system and improved downstream QPF. In contrast to the FC event, latent heat release in the primary rainband is shown to enhance the low-level jet ahead of the convection in the SC case, thereby increasing moisture transport into the downstream region. A negative model QPF bias was observed in Eta Model forecasts for the SC event. Suggestions are made for precipitation forecasting in UC situations, and implications for NWP model configuration are discussed.

scholarly journals Spin-up time from switching the microphysics scheme in the assimilation cycle and impacts on the precipitation forecast quality

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Ulbrich ◽  
Christian Welzbacher ◽  
Kobra Khosravianghadikolaei ◽  
Michael Hoff ◽  
Alberto de Lozar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Weather Prediction ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Additional Measure ◽  
Microphysics Scheme ◽  
Numerical Weather ◽  
Complementary Approach ◽  
Forecast Quality

<p>The SINFONY project at Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) aims to produce seamless precipitation forecast products from minutes up to 12 hours, with particular focus on convective events. While the near future predictions are typically from nowcasting procedures using radar data, the numerical weather prediction (NWP) aims at longer time scales. The lead-time in the latest available forecast is usually too long for merging both the nowcasting and NWP output to produce reliable seamless predictions.</p><p>At DWD, the current forecasts are produced by the short range numerical weather prediction (SRNWP) <span>making use of a</span> continuous assimilation cycle with relatively long cutoff times and using 1-moment microphysics. In order to reduce the differences in the precipitation to the <span>nowcasting </span>on the NWP side, we use two different approaches. First, we reduce the lead-time from the model start by running 1-hourly forecasts based on an assimilation cycle with shorter data cutoff. Secondly, we use new observational systems in the assimilation cycle, such as radar or satellite data to capture and represent strong convective activity. This procedure is called Rapid Update Cycle (RUC). As an additional measure, we introduce a 2-Moment microphysics scheme into the numerical model, resulting in a better representation of the radar reflectivities. In order to keep the model state similar to that of the SRNWP, the RUC is a time limited assimilation cycle starting from forecasts of the SRNWP at pre-defined times.</p><p>The introduction of the 2-Moment scheme leads to a spin-up affecting both the assimilation cycle and the short forecasts. The resulting effects are analysed by comparison with the corresponding assimilation cycle using the 1-Moment scheme. As a complementary approach for the analysis, the routine cycle is run with the 2-Moment scheme. The forecast quality is used as a measure to compare the results with respect to precipitation and additional observed parameters. It is shown in how far the resulting improvements are related to the assimilation and momentum scheme, or to the higher frequency of forecasts.</p>

Probabilistic precipitation nowcast for flash flooding purposes across Australia: verification of a new version of Short-Term Ensemble Prediction System (STEPS)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Velasco-Forero ◽  
Jayaram Pudashine ◽  
Mark Curtis ◽  
Alan Seed
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Flash Flooding ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Study Results

<div> <p>Short-term precipitation forecast plays a vital role for minimizing the adverse effects of heavy precipitation events such as flash flooding.  Radar rainfall nowcasting techniques based on statistical extrapolations are used to overcome current limitations of precipitation forecasts from numerical weather models, as they provide high spatial and temporal resolutions forecasts within minutes of the observation time. Among various algorithms, the Short-Term Ensemble Prediction System (STEPS) provides rainfall fields nowcasts in a probabilistic sense by accounting the uncertainty in the precipitation forecasts by means of ensembles, with spatial and temporal characteristic very similar to those in the observed radar rainfall fields. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology uses STEPS to generate ensembles of forecast rainfall ensembles in real-time from its extensive weather radar network. </p> </div><div> <p>In this study, results of a large probabilistic verification exercise to a new version of STEPS (hereafter named STEPS-3) are reported. An extensive dataset of more than 47000 individual 5-minute radar rainfall fields (the equivalent of more than 163 days of rain) from ten weather radars across Australia (covering tropical to mid-latitude regions) were used to generate (and verify) 96-member rainfall ensembles nowcasts with up to a 90-minute lead time. STEPS-3 was found to be more than 15-times faster in delivering results compared with previous version of STEPS and an open-source algorithm called pySTEPS. Interestingly, significant variations were observed in the quality of predictions and verification results from one radar to other, from one event to other, depending on the characteristics and location of the radar, nature of the rainfall event, accumulation threshold and lead time. For example, CRPS and RMSE of ensembles of 5-min rainfall forecasts for radars located in mid-latitude regions are better (lower) than those ones from radars located in tropical areas for all lead-times. Also, rainfall fields from S-band radars seem to produce rainfall forecasts able to successfully identify extreme rainfall events for lead times up to 10 minutes longer than those produced using C-band radar datasets for the same rain rate thresholds. Some details of the new STEPS-3 version, case studies and examples of the verification results will be presented. </p> </div>

scholarly journals Performance of IMD multi-model ensemble and WRF (ARW) model for sub-basin wise rainfall forecast during monsoon 2012

MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-332
Author(s):  
ASHOK KUMAR DAS ◽  
SURINDER KAUR
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Models ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
India Meteorological Department ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
False Alarms ◽  
Model Ensemble ◽  
Rainfall Forecast ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Arw Model ◽  
Nwp Model

The Numerical Weather Prediction models, Multi-model Ensemble (MME) (27 km × 27 km) and WRF (ARW) (9 km × 9 km) operationally run by India Meteorological Department (IMD) have been utilized to estimate sub-basin wise rainfall forecast. The sub-basin wise operational Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (QPF) have been issued by 10 field offices named Flood Meteorological Offices (FMOs) of IMD located at different flood prone areas of the country. The daily sub-basin wise NWP model rainfall forecast for 122 sub basins under these 10 FMOs for the flood season 2012 have been estimated on operational basis which are used by forecasters at FMOs as a guidance for the issue of operational sub-basin QPF for flood forecasting purposes. The performance of the MME and WRF (ARW) models rainfall at the sub-basin level have been studied in detail. The performance of WRF (ARW) and MME models is compared in the heavy rainfall case over the river basins (Mahanadi etc.) falls under FMO, Bhubaneswar and it is found that WRF (ARW) model gives better result than MME. It is also found that performance of WRF (ARW) is little better than MME when compared over all the flood prone river sub basins of India. For high rainfall categories (51-100,  >100 mm), generally these leads to floods, the success rate of model rainfall forecasts are less and false alarms are more. The NWP models are able to capture the rainfall events but there is difference in magnitudes of sub basin wise rainfall estimates.

scholarly journals Improving Ensemble Forecasting Using Total Least Squares and Lead-Time Dependent Bias Correction

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Jabbari ◽  
Deg-Hyo Bae
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Total Least Squares ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
The Real

Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models produce a quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF), which is vital for a wide range of applications, especially for accurate flash flood forecasting. The under- and over-estimation of forecast uncertainty pose operational risks and often encourage overly conservative decisions to be made. Since NWP models are subject to many uncertainties, the QPFs need to be post-processed. The NWP biases should be corrected prior to their use as a reliable data source in hydrological models. In recent years, several post-processing techniques have been proposed. However, there is a lack of research on post-processing the real-time forecast of NWP models considering bias lead-time dependency for short- to medium-range forecasts. The main objective of this study is to use the total least squares (TLS) method and the lead-time dependent bias correction method—known as dynamic weighting (DW)—to post-process forecast real-time data. The findings show improved bias scores, a decrease in the normalized error and an improvement in the scatter index (SI). A comparison between the real-time precipitation and flood forecast relative bias error shows that applying the TLS and DW methods reduced the biases of real-time forecast precipitation. The results for real-time flood forecasts for the events of 2002, 2007 and 2011 show error reductions and accuracy improvements of 78.58%, 81.26% and 62.33%, respectively.

scholarly journals Impact Assessment of Uncertainty Propagation of Ensemble NWP Rainfall to Flood Forecasting with Catchment Scale

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wansik Yu ◽  
Eiichi Nakakita ◽  
Sunmin Kim ◽  
Kosei Yamaguchi
Keyword(s):  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Uncertainty Propagation ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Flood Forecast ◽  
Catchment Scale ◽  
Forecast Uncertainty ◽  
Specific Discharge ◽  
Nwp Model

The common approach to quantifying the precipitation forecast uncertainty is ensemble simulations where a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model is run for a number of cases with slightly different initial conditions. In practice, the spread of ensemble members in terms of flood discharge is used as a measure of forecast uncertainty due to uncertain precipitation forecasts. This study presents the uncertainty propagation of rainfall forecast into hydrological response with catchment scale through distributed rainfall-runoff modeling based on the forecasted ensemble rainfall of NWP model. At first, forecast rainfall error based on the BIAS is compared with flood forecast error to assess the error propagation. Second, the variability of flood forecast uncertainty according to catchment scale is discussed using ensemble spread. Then we also assess the flood forecast uncertainty with catchment scale using an estimation regression equation between ensemble rainfall BIAS and discharge BIAS. Finally, the flood forecast uncertainty with RMSE using specific discharge in catchment scale is discussed. Our study is carried out and verified using the largest flood event by typhoon “Talas” of 2011 over the 33 subcatchments of Shingu river basin (2,360 km2), which is located in the Kii Peninsula, Japan.

scholarly journals High-Resolution QPF Uncertainty and Its Implications for Flood Prediction: A Case Study for the Eastern Iowa Flood of 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1289-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bong-Chul Seo ◽  
Felipe Quintero ◽  
Witold F. Krajewski
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Flood Prediction ◽  
Forecast Lead Time ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Hydrologic Prediction ◽  
Map Analysis

Abstract This study addresses the uncertainty of High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs), which were recently appended to the operational hydrologic forecasting framework. In this study, we examine the uncertainty features of HRRR QPFs for an Iowa flooding event that occurred in September 2016. Our evaluation of HRRR QPFs is based on the conventional approach of QPF verification and the analysis of mean areal precipitation (MAP) with respect to forecast lead time. The QPF verification results show that the precipitation forecast skill of HRRR significantly drops during short lead times and then gradually decreases for further lead times. The MAP analysis also demonstrates that the QPF error sharply increases during short lead times and starts decreasing slightly beyond 4-h lead time. We found that the variability of QPF error measured in terms of MAP decreases as basin scale and lead time become larger and longer, respectively. The effects of QPF uncertainty on hydrologic prediction are quantified through the hillslope-link model (HLM) simulations using hydrologic performance metrics (e.g., Kling–Gupta efficiency). The simulation results agree to some degree with those from the MAP analysis, finding that the performance achieved from the QPF forcing decreases during 1–3-h lead times and starts increasing with 4–6-h lead times. The best performance acquired at the 1-h lead time does not seem acceptable because of the large overestimation of the flood peak, along with an erroneous early peak that is not observed in streamflow observations. This study provides further evidence that HRRR contains a well-known weakness at short lead times, and the QPF uncertainty (e.g., bias) described as a function of forecast lead times should be corrected before its use in hydrologic prediction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document