scholarly journals Acute Pancreatitis after Colonoscopy: A Case Presentation and Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Sahil D. Doshi ◽  
Yelina Alvarez ◽  
Shria Kumar ◽  
Octavia Pickett-Blakely

We report a case of acute pancreatitis after an elective screening colonoscopy. A 51-year-old male with a left ventricular assist device for end-stage nonischemic cardiomyopathy and a family history of colorectal cancer was admitted for an expedited heart transplant evaluation. He underwent screening colonoscopy during this admission which was technically uncomplicated apart from requiring slight maneuvering at the splenic flexure. The following day, the patient developed acute epigastric pain and one episode of emesis. Subsequent laboratory evaluation revealed a significantly elevated lipase level and cross-sectional imaging consistent with acute pancreatitis. With no evidence of gallstones, alcohol use, and hypertriglyceridemia, the acute pancreatitis was deemed to be a complication of colonoscopy. The presumed mechanism of the pancreatitis was due to mechanical trauma from insufflation and abdominal pressure, applied to at the splenic flexure, which is in close proximity to the pancreatic tail. The patient was treated with supportive care (intravenous fluid, analgesia, and pancreatic rest) and improved significantly over a three-day period.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e039470
Author(s):  
HyunChul Youn ◽  
Suk-young Lee ◽  
Han-yong Jung ◽  
Shin-Gyeom Kim ◽  
Seung‑Hyun Kim ◽  
...  

ObjectivesLife-sustaining treatment is any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical conditions, and includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, haemodialysis and left ventricular assist devices. This study aimed to investigate the thoughts on life-sustaining treatment of Koreans and to assess the factors associated with deciding to not receive life-sustaining treatment if they develop a terminal disease.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingGuro-gu centre for dementia from 1 May 2018 to 31 December 2019.ParticipantsIn total, 150 individuals participated in this study.Outcome measuresThe questionnaire consisted of self-report items with some instructions, demographic characteristics, thoughts on life-sustaining treatment and psychosocial scales. The preferences of the participants were investigated on the assumption that they develop terminal cancer. The psychosocial scales included the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS).ResultsWe classified our participants into two groups: individuals who wanted to receive life-sustaining treatment (IRLT) and individuals who wanted to not receive life-sustaining treatment (INLT). There were twice as many participants in the INLT group than there were in the IRLT. In making this decision, the INLT group focused more on physical and mental distress. Additionally, 32.7% of participants responded that terminal status was an optimal time for this decision, but more participants want to decide it earlier. The GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly higher in the INLT group than in the IRLT group. However, the INLT group had significantly lower MSPSS family scores.ConclusionOur findings can help assess issues regarding advance directives and life-sustaining treatment, and will be a reference for designing future studies on this issue.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e037017
Author(s):  
Michael Levelink ◽  
Harald Christian Eichstaedt ◽  
Sven Meyer ◽  
Anna Levke Brütt

IntroductionDue to technological progress and persistent shortage of donor hearts, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become established in the treatment of advanced heart failure. Accordingly, more patients live with LVADs for prolonged periods. Related research focused primarily on clinical issues and little is known about psychosocial aspects of living with an LVAD. This study aims to explore psychological burden and coping following LVAD implantation.Methods and analysisAn exploratory qualitative study with cross-sectional and longitudinal elements will be carried out. At least 18 patients with LVAD who have the device implanted from a few weeks to more than 3 years will be interviewed in the cross-sectional component using an interview guide. A subsample of patients who live with the LVAD for up to 3 months when recruited will be interviewed two additional times in the following year. The cross-sectional interviews will be analysed using an inductive qualitative content analysis to describe psychological burden, coping resources and behaviour from the patient’s perspective. Based on the findings, the longitudinal interviews will be analysed with a deductive content analysis to explore psychological adjustment during the first year after implantation. The findings will provide a deeper understanding of the complex and specific situation of patients with LVAD and of psychological adjustment to living with a life-sustaining implant. This can help clinicians in considering individual aspects to promote patient outcomes and is the basis for further research on healthcare interventions or technical solutions to reduce burden and for developing rehabilitation measures to promote psychosocial outcomes.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the School of Medicine and Health Sciences at the University of Oldenburg (2019-023). Study findings will be disseminated at national and international conferences and through peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016883).


2018 ◽  
pp. bcr-2018-225877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andree H Koop ◽  
Ryan E Bailey ◽  
Philip E Lowman

A 63-year-old man was admitted for severe acute pancreatitis. On day 3 of hospitalisation, he developed shortness of breath and acute pulmonary oedema. Echocardiogram revealed global hypokinesis with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 20%, and he was diagnosed with takotsubo cardiomyopathy. He developed cardiogenic shock which was treated successfully with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device. His left ventricular ejection fraction improved by hospital follow-up 3 weeks later.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Nicolae ◽  
R Aflorii ◽  
A C Popescu

Abstract Background ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction and acute pancreatitis are diagnostic and therapeutic emergencies. The concomitance of these two pathologies produces intricate and confusing symptoms leading to late presentation. Clinical Case Description- We present the case of a 62-year-old male patient, non-smoker, admitted in the emergency department for intense, continuous epigastric pain with posterior radiation and dyspnea, started four days before. On admission we found hemodynamic stability, lung crackles in the ½ inferior of the right lung, SaO2= 94% under 3l/min O2, normal cardiac sounds, HR 102/min, mitral systolic murmur, BP 145/80mmHg, abdominal pain on palpation. Lab tests revealed elevated cardiac troponin values and detection of a fall of cTn values in dynamics (hs-cTnI 30372ng/l, TnI 73ng/ml), but also high serum transaminases, amylase and lipase (1278 U/l), with high inflammatory markers, leukocytosis and neutrophilia. ECG showed sinus rhythm, QRS axis 0 degrees, ST segment elevation in V1-V4, ST segment depression DI, aVL, negative and biphasic T waves in V5-V6, DI, DII, aVL, Q wave in DIII, aVF and poor R wave progression V1-V4. Admission echocardiography revealed dilated left cavities with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (EF 20%), akinesia of the anterior and inferolateral walls, moderate mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, grade III diastolic dysfunction and possible pulmonary arterial hypertension. Coronary angiography revealed distal stenosis of the left main, involving the bifurcation, 80% ostial LAD stenosis, proximal LAD occlusion, 30% ostial LCX. PCI with DES of the proximal LAD, and left main–LDA junction with overlapping was performed successfully. Abdominal echography showed increased volume of the pancreas and significant decrease in echogenicity. Abdominal CT scan assessed inflammatory changes in pancreas and peripancreatic fat (grade C Balthazar score), superior mesenteric artery partial thrombosis and alveolar consolidation in the right lung. Echocardiography reassessment four days later revealed a fresh apical thrombus of the left ventricle. He received treatment with low molecular weight heparin, dual antiplatelet therapy statin, loop diuretic, aldosterone antagonist, digoxin, antibiotics and food restriction with gradual oral realimentation. He needed positive inotropic support for the first 4 days from a total of 28 days of hospitalization. Conclusions ECG changes and prothrombotic status can occur in patients with acute pancreatitis. The diagnosis and management of STEMI concomitant with acute pancreatitis can be challenging. The multimodality imaging and interdisciplinary approach individualized to the patient’s clinical situation is important, especially when having safety concerns about the revascularization therapy, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Abstract P1259 Figure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anum Arif ◽  
Farhat Jaleel ◽  
Khalid Rashid

Objective: To determine the accuracy of BISAP score in comparison with Ranson’s score in detection of severe acute pancreatitis. Methods: This cross sectional study was performed in Emergency department and Surgery department of Dow university hospital from January 2015 to December 2015. A total of 206 patients were included. Those diagnosed with acute pancreatitis on the basis of epigastric pain, serum amylase levels more than 300 (more than 3 times normal) and meeting the inclusion criteria were subjected to investigations for Ranson’s and BISAP scoring. BISAP score was calculated at 24 hours and Ranson’s score both at 24 and 48 hours. A score of > 3 was used to label severe acute pancreatitis according to both scoring systems. Results: In our study accuracy to predict SAP by BISAP score was 76.2 % and Ranson’s score was 82.2%. On the basis of sensitivity, Ranson’s scores predicted SAP more accurately than BISAP scores (97.4% vs. 69.2%). Regarding specificity, both scores predicted SAP almost equally (78.4% vs. 77.8%). Conclusion: BISAP score is a valuable tool in predicting severe Acute Pancreatitis in early hours. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.4.1286 How to cite this:Arif A, Jaleel F, Rashid K. Accuracy of BISAP score in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(4):---------.  doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.4.1286 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A386-A387
Author(s):  
Marina Torres Torres ◽  
Kimberly Padilla Rodriguez ◽  
Norma Vergne-Santiago ◽  
Andrea del Toro Diez ◽  
Alex N Gonzalez Bossolo ◽  
...  

Abstract Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection primarily affects the respiratory tract, but gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms may obscure a secondary diagnosis. GI symptoms similar to the ones presented in acute pancreatitis (AP) have been reported. SARS-CoV-2 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors, which have been identified in the lungs and pancreas. It has been discussed that systemic response to the infection prompts dysregulation in the affected organs. Hyperglycemia is an independent risk factor for increased mortality and thus a detailed assessment must be performed. A 47 year-old man with dyslipidemia arrived at the ER due to a severe constant epigastric pain of 1 day of evolution with back radiation associated with nauseas, emesis, and hyporexia. Upon examination he was tachycardic and in distress due to pain. Laboratories revealed normocytosis, normal hemoglobin, mild thrombocytopenia, hyperglycemia (150 mg/dL), corrected hyponatremia (130 mmol/L), and corrected hypocalcemia (7.4 mg/dL). Amylase (2,332 U/L) and lipase (2,990 U/L) were elevated. Triglycerides were 6,256 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin was 6.1%. Abdominal CT scan revealed pancreatitis. He was admitted to the ICU due to severe AP due to hypertriglyceridemia with IV hydration and IV insulin infusion. During the first day of admission, he developed respiratory distress requiring intubation, marked abdominal distension, hemodynamic instability, and oliguria. Intra-abdominal pressure yielded 24 mmHg leading to the diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome. He underwent emergent abdominal decompressive laparotomy with Bogota Bag placement. COVID-19 PCR test was performed and reported positive. 72 hours later, triglycerides improved and IV insulin was discontinued, but hyperglycemic state prompted subcutaneous basal and correction boluses. Insulin requirement progressively decreased and was discontinued after 14 days. He continued to show clinical improvement and by day 40, the patient was successfully extubated and discharged after physical rehabilitation. SARS-CoV-2 infection has shown a complex multisystem involvement leading to variable presentations which can be fatal if not identified and addressed properly. Albeit, AP is a rare manifestation of COVID-19, clinicians should be aware and pay attention to the related complications. Proposed mechanisms for hyperglycemia and AP include β-cell damage. The pathogenetic role of COVID-19 in hypertriglyceridemia is unclear. Little attention has been paid to the extent of pancreatic injury caused by this virus. To our knowledge this is the second case presenting with hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and AP in COVID-19 infection. As the global pandemic is still growing, elucidation of key pathways and mechanisms underlying these associations would aid in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 worldwide.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1273-1281
Author(s):  
Jens Garbade ◽  
Josephine Rast ◽  
Gerhard Schmalz ◽  
Mirjam Eisner ◽  
Justus Wagner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document