scholarly journals Seismic Fragility Analysis of High Earth-Rockfill Dams considering the Number of Ground Motion Records

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Congcong Jin ◽  
Shichun Chi
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Damage Index ◽  
Fragility Analysis ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Settlement Rate ◽  
Earthquake Records ◽  
Rockfill Dam ◽  
Ground Motion Records ◽  
The Impact

This study analyzes the impact of the number of ground motions on the seismic fragility of a high earth-rockfill dam and the estimation of reasonable fragility parameters based on a sufficient number of earthquake records. In this paper, the vertical deformation is obtained using the three-dimensional finite element program DYNE3WAC combined with the Pastor–Zienkiewicz–Chan model and Biot dynamic consolidation theory. The relative seismic settlement rate is considered the damage index for the seismic fragility analysis of the dam. The fragility curves of the high earth-rockfill dam are determined by the multiple stripe analysis (MSA) method. A set of seismic waves is chosen based on the spectrum in the Chinese hydraulic structure seismic code. With an increasing number of earthquake records, the coefficients of variation (COV) of the mean and standard deviation (STD) of the relative seismic settlement rate decrease and tend to stabilize when the number of earthquake records reaches 34. The estimated fragility parameters θ and β are constant when the number of earthquake records exceeds 34. The requisite number of earthquake records for an accurate fragility estimation is determined by analyzing the lower and upper confidence intervals for the estimated θ and β. The 95% and 90% confidence interval can accurately estimate the fragility of a high earth-rockfill dam when the number of ground motion records reaches 36 and 32, respectively. The results of the fragility analysis demonstrate that the DYNE3WAC program and MSA method can provide an effective basis for determining fragility curves. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis of earthquake records is essential for assessing the seismic fragility of high earth-rockfill dams.

scholarly journals SEISMIC FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT AND RETROFIT OF A GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL BUILDING IN CHITTAGONG, BANGLADESH

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. AbulHasan ◽  
Md. Abdur Rahman Bhuiyan
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Ground Motion Records

Chittagong Medical College Hospital (CMCH) is one of the most important government hospitals in Bangladesh. It is located in the heart of Chittagong city, the only port city of Bangladesh. Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) is the only official document, which has been used since 1993 as guidelines for seismic design of buildings. As per the guidelines of BNBC, the CMCH building was designed for an earthquake ground motion having a return period of 200 years. However, the revised version of BNBC has suggested that the building structures shall be designed for an earthquake ground motion having a return period of 2475 years. It is mentioned that a single seismic performance objective, the life safety, of the building is considered in both versions of BNBC. Considering the significant importance of CMCH building in providing the emergency facilities during and after the earthquake, it is indispensable to evaluate its seismic vulnerability for the two types of earthquake ground motion records having return period of 200 (Type-I) and 2475 (Type-II) years. In this regard, this paper deals with the seismic vulnerability assessment of the existing ancillary building (AB) of CMCH. The seismic vulnerability of building is usually expressed in the form of fragility curves, which display the conditional probability that the structural demand (structural response) caused by various levels of ground shaking exceeds the structural capacity defined by a damage state. The analytical method based on elastic response spectrum analyses results is used in evaluating the seismic fragility curves of the building. To the end, 3-D finite element model of the building subjected to 18 ground motion records having PGA of 0.325g to 0.785g has been used in theresponse spectrum analysis in order to evaluate its inter-story-drift ratio (IDR), an engineeringdemand parameter (EDP) for developing fragility curves. The analytical results have shown thatstructural deficiencies exist in the existing ancillary building (AB) for the Type-II earthquakeground motion record, which requires the building to be retrofitted to ensure that the existingancillary building (AB) becomes functional during and after the Type-II earthquake groundmotion record.

scholarly journals Dynamic Damage Mechanism and Seismic Fragility Analysis of an Aqueduct Structure

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 11709
Author(s):  
Xinyong Xu ◽  
Xuhui Liu ◽  
Li Jiang ◽  
Mohd Yawar Ali Khan
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Fragility Analysis ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Exceedance Probability ◽  
Computation Efficiency

The Concrete Damaged Plasticity (CDP) constitutive is introduced to study the dynamic failure mechanism and the law of damage development to the aqueduct structure during the seismic duration using a large-scale aqueduct structure from the South-to-North Water Division Project (SNWDP) as a research object. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) and multiple stripe analysis (MSA) seismic fragility methods are introduced. The spectral acceleration is used as the scale of ground motion record intensity measure (IM), and the aqueduct pier top offset ratio quantifies the limit of structural damage measure (DM). The aqueduct structure’s seismic fragility evaluation curves are constructed with indicators of different seismic intensity measures to depict the damage characteristics of aqueduct structures under different seismic intensities through probability. The results show that penetrating damage is most likely to occur on both sides of the pier cap and around the pier shaft in the event of a rare earthquake, followed by the top of the aqueduct body, which requires the greatest care during an earthquake. The results of two fragility analysis methodologies reveal that the fragility curves are very similar. The aqueduct structure’s first limit state level (LS1) is quite steep and near the vertical line, indicating that maintaining the excellent condition without damage in the seismic analysis will be challenging. Except for individual results, the overall fragility results are in good agreement, and the curve change rule is the same. The exceedance probability in the case of any ground motion record IM may be estimated using only two factors when using the MSA approach, and the computation efficiency is higher. The study of seismic fragility analysis methods in this paper can provide a reference for the seismic safety evaluation of aqueducts and similar structures.

scholarly journals Seismic Fragility Analysis of Buildings Based on Double-Parameter Damage Models considering Soil-Structure Interaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Panpan Zhai ◽  
Peng Zhao ◽  
Yang Lu ◽  
Chenying Ye ◽  
Feng Xiong
Keyword(s):  
Soil Structure ◽  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Damage Index ◽  
Fragility Analysis ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Damage Models ◽  
Fixed Model

Most conventional seismic fragility analyses of RC buildings usually ignore or greatly simplify the soil-structure interaction (SSI), and the maximum interstory drift ratio (MIDR) is often adopted to establish seismic fragility curves. In this work, an eight-story RC building was designed to study the influence of the SSI on the seismic fragility of RC buildings. Three double-parameter damage models (DPDMs) were considered for the fragility assessment: the Park–Ang model, the Niu model, and the Lu–Wang model. Results show that considering SSI induces a higher fragility than that of the fixed model and that employing the DPDMs for the fragility analysis provides more reasonable results than those evaluated using the MIDR damage index.

scholarly journals Seismic Fragility Analysis of Mid-Story Isolation Buildings

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Fragility Analysis ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Plastic State ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Isolation System ◽  
Isolation Layer

Abstract. Seismic fragility analysis is essential for seismic risk assessment of structures. This study focuses on the damage probability assessment of the mid-story isolation buildings with different locations of the isolation system. To this end, the performance-based fragility analysis method of the mid-story isolation system is proposed, adopting the maximum story drifts of structures above and below the isolation layer and displacement of the isolation layer as performance indicators. Then, the entire process of the mid-story isolation system, from the initial elastic state to the elastic-plastic state, then to the limit state, is simulated on the basis of the incremental dynamic analysis method. Seismic fragility curves are obtained for mid-story isolation buildings with different locations of the isolation layer, each with fragility curves for near-field and far-field ground motions, respectively. The results indicate that the seismic fragility probability subjected to the near-field ground motions is much greater than those subjected to the far-field ground motions. In addition, with the increase of the location of the isolation layer, the dominant components for the failure of mid-story isolated structures change from superstructure and isolation system to substructure and isolation system.

scholarly journals SEISMIC DAMAGE SCENARIOS IN KALAMATA (S. GREECE)

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 1495
Author(s):  
D. Kazantzidou-Firtinidou ◽  
I. Kassaras ◽  
A. Ganas ◽  
C. Tsimi ◽  
N. Sakellariou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Damage Scenarios ◽  
Local Soil ◽  
Protection Strategies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The City

Damage scenarios are necessary tools for stakeholders, in order to prepare protection strategies and a total emergency post-earthquake plan. To this aim, four seismic hazard models were developed for the city of Kalamata, according to stochastic simulation of the ground motion, using site amplification functions derived from ambient noise HVSR measurements. The structural vulnerability of the city was assessed following an empirical macroseismic model, developed for the European urban environment (EMS-98). The impact of the vulnerability due to the seismic hazard potential is also investigated by means of synthetic response spectral ratios at 108 sites of the city. The expected damage grade per building block, is calculated by combining vulnerability with the respective seismic intensities, derived for the four seismic sources. The importance of the followed methodology for implementing microzonation studies is emphasized, since the expected influence of the ground motion amplification due to local soil conditions has been approximated in detail. Moreover, new fragility curves for the main structural types in Kalamata are proposed for each seismic scenario.

scholarly journals A method of seismic performance evaluation based seismic fragility analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 175 ◽  
pp. 04036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Zhongzheng Guo
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Damage Index ◽  
Structural Models ◽  
Seismic Damage ◽  
Damage Parameter ◽  
Fragility Analysis ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Damage Level ◽  
Seismic Performance Evaluation

For evaluating seismic performance of structures, a method is presented based on increment dynamic analysis and seismic fragility analysis. Firstly, the failure probability equation is deduced, in which the relationships of seismic intensities and response demands can be determined by the increment dynamic analysis. On this basis the probabilities with different damage levels under different seismic intensities are obtained. Secondly, damage parameter R is defined and used to reflect seismic damage level of structures, damage index Re is defined and used to compare with R range and determine the situation of seismic damage. Finally, the procedure is proposed for evaluating structural seismic performance. In order to verify and demonstrate the method, three structural models are designed, and typical earthquake records are selected. The results of example analysis show that this method is convenient for evaluating multi-levels seismic performance of structures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document