scholarly journals The Impact of COVID-19 Disease on Platelets and Coagulation

Pathobiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey D. Wool ◽  
Jonathan L. Miller

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a spectrum of disease; some patients develop a severe proinflammatory state which can be associated with a unique coagulopathy and procoagulant endothelial phenotype. Initially, COVID-19 infection produces a prominent elevation of fibrinogen and D-dimer/fibrin(ogen) degradation products. This is associated with systemic hypercoagulability and frequent venous thromboembolic events. The degree of D-dimer elevation positively correlates with mortality in COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 also leads to arterial thrombotic events (including strokes and ischemic limbs) as well as microvascular thrombotic disorders (as frequently documented at autopsy in the pulmonary vascular beds). COVID-19 patients often have mild thrombocytopenia and appear to have increased platelet consumption, together with a corresponding increase in platelet production. Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) and severe bleeding events are uncommon in COVID-19 patients. Here, we review the current state of knowledge of COVID-19 and hemostasis.

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Pomej ◽  
Bernhard Scheiner ◽  
Dabin Park ◽  
David Bauer ◽  
Lorenz Balcar ◽  
...  

VEGF(R)-targeted therapies are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and bleeding, which might be pronounced in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Nevertheless, sorafenib represents an important treatment option in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively investigated the risk of arterial/venous thromboembolic and bleeding events in 252 patients treated with sorafenib for HCC between 05/2006 and 03/2020 at the Medical University of Vienna. Cardiovascular risk was assessed using Framingham score. Eight patients (3.2%) experienced 11 arterial/venous thromboembolic events. Only two patients (0.8%) developed arterial thromboembolism even though cardiovascular risk was low, intermediate, and high in 15 (8.7%), 104 (60%), and 54 (31.2%) of 173 assessable patients. Median overall survival (OS) was shorter in the high risk vs. low/intermediate risk group 7.4 (95% CI: 3.4–11.3) vs. 10.0 (95% CI: 6.8–13.2 months) and independently associated with OS in multivariable analysis HR: 1.53 (95% CI: 1.07–2.19; p = 0.019). Forty-eight (19%) patients experienced a bleeding, most commonly gastrointestinal bleeding (14%) followed by epistaxis (4.7%). Advanced liver dysfunction was not associated with an increased incidence of bleeding/venous thromboembolism. Sorafenib represents a safe treatment option even in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Bleeding complications were comparable with previous reports, even though patients with more advanced liver disease were included.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleftheria Kampouri ◽  
Paraskevas Filippidis ◽  
Benjamin Viala ◽  
Marie Méan ◽  
Olivier Pantet ◽  
...  

Background. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can result in profound changes in blood coagulation. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) among patients with COVID-19 requiring hospital admission. Subjects and Methods. We performed a retrospective study at the Lausanne University Hospital with patients admitted because of COVID-19 from February 28 to April 30, 2020. Results. Among 443 patients with COVID-19, VTE was diagnosed in 41 patients (9.3%; 27 pulmonary embolisms, 12 deep vein thrombosis, one pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, one portal vein thrombosis). VTE was diagnosed already upon admission in 14 (34.1%) patients and 27 (65.9%) during hospital stay (18 in ICU and nine in wards outside the ICU). Multivariate analysis revealed D-dimer value > 3,120   ng / ml ( P < 0.001 ; OR 15.8, 95% CI 4.7-52.9) and duration of 8 days or more from COVID-19 symptoms onset to presentation ( P 0.020; OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.3-18.3) to be independently associated with VTE upon admission. D-dimer value ≥ 3,000   ng / l combined with a Wells score for PE ≥ 2 was highly specific (sensitivity 57.1%, specificity 91.6%) in detecting VTE upon admission. Development of VTE during hospitalization was independently associated with D-dimer value > 5,611   ng / ml ( P < 0.001 ; OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.4-16.2) and mechanical ventilation ( P < 0.001 ; OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.3-15.1). Conclusions. VTE seems to be a common COVID-19 complication upon admission and during hospitalization, especially in ICU. The combination of Wells ≥ 2 score and D − dimer ≥ 3,000   ng / l is a good predictor of VTE at admission.


2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (03) ◽  
pp. 538-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ora Paltiel ◽  
Michael Bursztyn ◽  
Moshe Gatt

SummaryProlonged immobilization and advanced age are considered to be important risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nevertheless, the need for VTE prophylaxis in long-term bedridden patients is not known. To assess whether very prolonged immobilization (i.e. over three months) carries an increased risk for clinically apparent VTE, we performed a historical-cohort study of nursing home residents during a ten-year period. Data concerning patient’s mobility and incidence of overt deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were registered. The mean resident age was 85 ± 8.4 years. Eighteen mobile and eight immobile patients were diagnosed with clinically significant thromboembolic events, during 1137 and 573 patient-years of follow up, respectively. The incidence of venous thromboembolic events was similar in both chronically immobilized and mobile patient groups, 13.9 and 15.8 per thousand patient years, respectively (p = 0.77). The rate ratio for having a VTE event in the immobilized patient group as compared with the mobile group was 0.88 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.33 to 2.13). When taking into account baseline characteristics, risk factors and death rates by various causes, no differences were found between the two groups. In conclusion, chronically immobile bedridden patients are no more prone to clinically overt venous thromboembolic events than institutionalized mobile patients. Until further studies are performed concerning the impact of very prolonged immobilization on the risk of VTE, there is no evidence to support primary prevention after the first three months of immobilization. Evidence for efficacy or cost effectiveness beyond this early period is not available.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4037-4037
Author(s):  
Maithili A Shethia ◽  
Aparna Hegde ◽  
Xiao Zhou ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Saroj Vadhan-Raj

4037 Background: Patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer are at high risk for VTE, and the occurrence of VTE can affect pts’ prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of VTE and the impact of timing of VTE (early vs. late) on survival. Methods: Medical record of 260 pts with pancreatic cancer, newly referred to UT MDACC during one year period from 1/1/2006 to 12/31/2006, were reviewed for the incidence of VTE during a 2-year follow-up period from the date of diagnosis. All VTE episodes were confirmed by radiologic studies. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Of the 260 pts, 47 pts (18%) had 51 episodes of VTE during the 2-year follow-up. The median age of the pts with VTE was 61 years (range: 28-86) and 53% were males. Of the 47 pts with VTE, 27 (57%) had PE, 19 (40%) had DVT and 1 had concurrent PE/DVT. Three pts had recurrent VTE during the study period. Median follow-up time for OS was 192 days (range: 1-1652 days). Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis showed that those who developed VTE earlier (within 30 or 90 days) had shorter median overall survival (OS) compared with those who had VTE beyond these time points. The hazard ratios, 95% CI, and median OS at 1 year are summarized in the table below. Conclusions: The incidence of VTE is high in pts with pancreatic cancer. The timing of VTE had a significant impact on OS; pts who had an early development of VTE had a shorter overall survival. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-52
Author(s):  
Zh. Cherneva ◽  
R. Cherneva

AbstractThe SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is due to lack of prior immunity and there is no certain management, regarding the complications of this viral illness. The target organ for COVID-19 infection are the lungs. Patients may develop acute lung injury that can be complicated by acute respiratory failure, as well as multiorgan failure. The pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection is characterized with inflammatory changes, associated with coagulopathy. Recent data suggests diffuse bilateral pulmonary inflammation observed in COVID-19 infection that is related to a novel pulmonary-specific vasculopathy, defined as pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy (PIC), distinct from disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). The coagulopathy associated with COVID-19 is distinguished by initial elevation of D-dimer and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products. Abnormalities in prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and platelet counts are not common in the early stages of the infection. This suggests the early screening measurement of D-dimer and fibrinogen. The implications for COVID-19-associated-coagulopathy is the established thromboembolic prophylaxis and standard management for sepsis-induced coagulopathy or DIC. High levels of D-dimer are a marker of higher mortality risk. However, current studies do not show the common use of full therapeutical doses of anticoagulants, unless there are other clinical indications. Bleeding in COVID-19 infection is uncommon, even when a laboratory constellation for DIC is present. However, if it occurs, standard guidelines for DIC management should be followed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-45
Author(s):  
Zheina Cherneva ◽  
Radostina Cherneva

The lack of prior immunity to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) infection has led to pandemic, where there is no certain management, regarding the complications of  this viral illness. The lungs are the target organ for COVID-19 and patients develop acute lung injury that may progress to respiratory and multiorgan failure. Recent data shows the presence of diffuse bilateral pulmonary inflammation in COVID-19 infection. It is associated with a specific pulmonary vasculopathy, defined as pulmonary intravascular coagulopathy (PIC) that is distinct from disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). The coagulopathy in the early stages of COVID-19 is characterized by initial elevation of D-dimer and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, while abnormalities in prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time and platelet counts are uncommon. That is why screening of D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, are mandatory. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy should be treated, following the guidelines for thromboembolic prophylaxis. Although D-dimer is a marker of mortality, current data does not show routine application of anticoagulants, unless otherwise clinically indicated. Bleeding in COVID-19 is uncommon, even when a laboratory constellation for DIC is present. However, if it occurs, standard guidelines for DIC management should be followed. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962097790
Author(s):  
Xin Zhong ◽  
Zhongze Cao ◽  
Jiayi Song ◽  
Yuanmeng Liu ◽  
Qiang Guo

The biomarkers for predicting venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) after oncologic surgery are still lacking. The current study aimed to analyze the relationships of CD62P and GP IIb/IIIa with hypercoagulation after oncologic surgery. A total of 76 patients with primary abdominopelvic tumors in our hospital were enrolled. The patients were divided into groups A (malignancy with no VTE group), B (malignancy with VTE group), and C (benign with no VTE group). Twenty healthy volunteers were selected as control. The plasma CD62P (4.69 ± 2.55 vs. 1.76 ± 0.48) and the GP IIb/IIIa (9.28 ± 3.79 vs. 1.76 ± 0.48) levels in group A were significantly higher than those in the control group preoperatively. The CD62P (31.46 ± 17.13 vs. 13.51 ± 7.43, P < 0.05), GP IIb/IIIa (42.33 ± 21.82 vs. 13.51 ± 7.43, P < 0.05), and D-dimer (7.33 ± 2.34 vs. 2.03 ± 0.55, P < 0.05) levels in group B were markedly higher 7 days after operation compared with those in group A. The CD62P and the GP IIb/IIIa exhibited a positive correlation with the hypercoagulable state after oncologic surgery.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1151-1151
Author(s):  
Vivek Kesari ◽  
Maithili Shethia ◽  
Xiao Zhou ◽  
Michael Overman ◽  
Saroj Vadhan-Raj

Abstract Abstract 1151 Background: Patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer are at high risk for venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and the occurrence of VTE can adversely affect prognosis. However, it is unclear if the type of VTE such as symptomatic vs incidental, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) vs pulmonary embolism (PE), the location of VTE [DVT of extremities vs visceral veins (abdominal/pelvic veins)] or the timing of VTE from diagnosis can influence the survival. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of different types of VTE, the impact of types and timing of VTE (early vs late) on survival. Methods: Medical records of 260 pts with pancreatic cancer, newly referred to MDACC in 2006, were reviewed for cancer diagnosis, patient demographics (age, gender), presence of metastasis, the date of diagnosis of VTE, timing of VTE, type of VTE, the site of VTE, the incidence of VTE during 2 years of follow up from the date of diagnosis. Clinical and laboratory parameters predictive for survival were also reviewed. All VTE episodes, including symptomatic as well as incidental VTEs were confirmed by the radiological studies using CT ANGIO, CT scan, Doppler compression ultrasound or V/Q perfusion scans. The survival time was calculated from the date of cancer diagnosis to the date of last follow up. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. The stepwise selection method was employed to build a multivariate model using variables with p<0.15 in univariate analysis. Results: Of the 260 pts referred, 235 were confirmed to have the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. During the 2-year follow-up, 80 pts (34%) had 109 episodes of VTE, including symptomatic and incidental episodes. The median age of the pts with VTE was 59 years (range: 28–86) and 51% were males. Of the 80 pts with VTE, 21 (26%) had PE, 18 (23%) had DVT of extremities, 28 (35%) had DVT of visceral veins and 13 (16%) had concurrent PE/DVT (diagnosed on the same day). Of the 80 pts, 25 (31%) had 29 recurrent episodes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, as shown in the table below, indicated that the pts who had early VTE (defined as VTE diagnosed within 30 days from the date of diagnosis of pancreatic cancer) vs late VTE (> 30 days) and pts with metastasis vs no metastasis had statistically poor 1 year survival (log-rank test). Conclusions: These findings suggest that timing of VTE is an important indicator of prognosis, regardless of whether symptomatic or incidental. Patients with VTE within 30 days of diagnosis have shorter survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Deitcher ◽  
Craig M. Kessler ◽  
Geno Merli ◽  
James R. Rigas ◽  
Roger M. Lyons ◽  
...  

This study evaluated enoxaparin alone versus initial enoxaparin followed by warfarin in secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in adults with active malignancy. Cancer patients (n = 122) with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolic events were randomly allocated to receive subcutaneous enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours for 5 days, followed by 1.0 mg/kg daily (group 1a) or 1.5 mg/kg daily (group 1b) for 175 days, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours for at least 5 days and until a stable international normalized ratio of 2 to 3 was achieved on oral warfarin begun on day 2 and continued to day 180 (group 2). There were no significant differences in major and minor bleeding rates between treatment groups. No bleeding events were intracranial or fatal. Enoxaparin treatment was feasible, generally well tolerated, and effective for a 180-day period in the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with active malignancy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 1757-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert I. Hurwitz ◽  
Leonard B. Saltz ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
James Cassidy ◽  
Jonas Wiedemann ◽  
...  

Purpose Thromboembolism is a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. The contribution of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy to these events remains controversial. Patients and Methods Individual patient data were available for 6,055 patients in 10 randomized studies. Unadjusted and exposure-adjusted incidence of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) was estimated for the overall population and by tumor type. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for development of VTE. The safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients undergoing bevacizumab treatment was also examined. Results There were no statistically significant increases in the unadjusted or exposure-adjusted incidences of all-grade VTEs for bevacizumab versus controls in the overall population or by tumor type. The unadjusted incidence in the overall population was 10.9% with bevacizumab versus 9.8% with controls (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.35; P = .13); the rate per 100 patient-years was 18.5 for bevacizumab and 20.3 for controls (rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.06; P =.23). Incidences of grade 3 to 5 events were similar in both groups. Several risk factors for VTEs were identified, including tumor type, older age, poorer performance status, VTE history, and baseline oral anticoagulant use. No interactions between bevacizumab treatment and these factors were observed. For patients who had a VTE and received full-dose anticoagulation therapy, the risk of severe bleeding was low (< 1%) and unaffected by bevacizumab treatment. Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy did not statistically significantly increase the risk of VTEs versus chemotherapy alone. The risk for VTEs is driven predominantly by tumor and host factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document