Abstract 471: Barriers to Performing CPR in a Community With a Low Prevalence of Bystander CPR

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parth Patel ◽  
Christina Smith ◽  
Barry Knapp ◽  
Joseph Lang ◽  
Julie Stoner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
American Heart ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
National Norms ◽  
Low Prevalence ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Legal Consequences

Introduction: Sudden cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in the United States, with over 475,000 people dying annually. Bystander CPR significantly improves the odds of neurologically intact survival, yet nationally is performed in only 46% of out of hospital cardiac arrests. Significant regional variation exists in the performance of bystander CPR, with our community performing lower than national norms (26%). We sought to assess our community’s awareness of current American Heart Association (AHA) recommendations and the perceived barriers to performing bystander CPR. Methods: Adult study volunteers were recruited within the community (Norfolk, VA; pop. 244,703) and completed a 15-question anonymous survey that assessed knowledge of AHA recommendations, willingness to perform, and perceived barriers to performing CPR. Results: A total of 1,017 respondents completed all or part of the survey (40% male; 60% female). Knowledge of the importance of CPR was high. Of the respondents, 78% (n=708) indicated they would know if CPR was required, 84% (n=756) recognized the importance of performing CPR on a person who is unconscious and not breathing, and 89% (n=733) agreed CPR should not be delayed until the arrival of an ambulance. Though 70% (n=597) of respondents indicated they had been previously trained to perform CPR, only 44% (n=397) had been trained to perform “hands-only” CPR. Several barriers to performing CPR were identified. Forty-nine percent of respondents (n=402) believed they must perform “mouth to mouth” during CPR while 32% (n=284) were concerned they could catch a disease. Fear of doing something wrong while performing CPR was a concern for 28% (n=257). Twenty-six percent (n=237) reported concerns about the legal consequences of performing CPR. Conclusions: Though the importance of bystander CPR is well recognized in our community, misunderstandings regarding requirements and risks continue to exist. Education efforts should focus on increasing community awareness of current AHA recommendations.

scholarly journals Creation of a Sudden Cardiac Arrest Safety Net

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Mary McCormack ◽  
Carole Zarcone ◽  
Kendra Hoepper ◽  
Pamela Watters
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
The United States ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr

Background: More than 350,000 episodes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occur annually in the United States, with less than half of the victims receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Provision of bystander CPR has been noted to increase survival rates two to three-fold; however, bystander CPR is initiated in less than 50 % of out of OHCA episodes in the United States.Aim: The purpose of this pilot study was to create a sudden cardiac arrest safety net on a college campus. The American Heart Association (AHA) CPR in Schools Program© was provided to college students, athletes, faculty and staff.Method: A multi-group educational intervention with a pre- and post-test design. Results: Participant knowledge level of CPR and AED use significantly improved on the post test. Additionally, after attending the sessions participants reported an increase in comfort level performing CPR and improved knowledge of the locations of the AEDs on campus. As a result of the program, nine additional AED’s have been placed in high-traffic areas on campus.Conclusion: Empowering laypersons with the skills and knowledge to respond to potential episodes of OHCA are integral steps towards improving patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Save a Life: Implementation and Evaluation of a Community-Focused CPR Education Program in Houston, Texas

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272199824
Author(s):  
Ebun O. Ebunlomo ◽  
Laura Gerik ◽  
Rene Ramon
Keyword(s):  
Health Education ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Collaborative Education ◽  
Kirkpatrick Model ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
States Experience ◽  
Cpr Training

Over 350 000 people in the United States experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) annually—and almost 90% die as a result. However, survival varies widely between counties, ranging from 3.4% to 22.0%—a disparity that the American Heart Association (AHA) largely attributes to variation in rates of bystander CPR. Studies show that regions with low rates of bystander CPR have low rates of CPR training, making CPR training initiatives a high-priority intervention to reduce OHCA mortality. In Houston, Texas, researchers have identified census tracts with higher OCHA incidence and lower rates of bystander CPR. We developed a free, annual Hands-Only CPR bilingual health education program central to these high-risk neighborhoods. In 5 years, this collaborative effort trained over 2700 individuals. In 2016, 2017, and 2018, we conducted a process evaluation to assess fidelity, dose delivered, and dose received. We also conducted an outcome evaluation using the Kirkpatrick Model for Training Evaluation to assess participants’ reactions and learning. Overall, the program yielded positive outcomes. Of the 261 respondents (from 314 attendees), 63% were first-time learners. The majority (87%) were satisfied with the event and 85% felt that information was presented clearly and concisely. Pre- and post-knowledge assessments showed a 51% increase in the proportion of respondents who could correctly identify the steps for Hands-Only CPR. This program exemplifies how collaborative education can impact a community’s health status. Leveraging each partner’s resources and linkages with the community can enhance the reach and sustainability of health education initiatives.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of the Newborn

1990 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Robert A. Sinkin ◽  
Jonathan M. Davis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
American Academy ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
Life Support ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Delivery Room ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

Approximately 3.5 million babies are born each year in approximately 5000 hospitals in the United States. Only 15% of these hospitals have neonatal intensive care facilities. Six percent of all newborns require life support in the delivery room or nursery, and this need for resuscitation rises to 80% in neonates weighing less than 1500 g at birth. Personnel who are skilled in neonatal resuscitation and capable of functioning as a team and an appropriately equipped delivery room must always be readily available. At least one person skilled in neonatal resuscitation should be in attendance at every delivery. Currently, a joint effort by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association has resulted in the development of a comprehensive course to train appropriate personnel in neonatal resuscitation throughout the United States. Neonatal resuscitation is also taught as part of a Pediatric Advanced Life Support course offered by the American Heart Association. In concert with the goals of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association, we strongly urge all personnel responsible for care of the newborn in the delivery room to become certified in neonatal resuscitation. The practical approach to neonatal resuscitation is the focus of this article.

Abstract P003: Distribution of Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics in US and Non-US populations: A Meta-Analysis of Proportions

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan Younus ◽  
Ehimen Aneni ◽  
Oluseye Ogunmoroti ◽  
Omar Jamal ◽  
Shozab Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
American Heart Association ◽  
Cardiovascular Health ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Ideal Cardiovascular Health ◽  
Us Studies

Introduction: With the development of new health metrics to define ideal cardiovascular health (CVH), several studies have examined the distribution of the American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 ideal CVH metrics both within and outside the United States (US). In this meta-analysis of proportions, we synthesized available data on ideal CVH metrics distribution in US cohorts and compared them with non-US populations. Methods: A MEDLINE database search was conducted using relevant free text terms such as “life’s simple 7”, “AHA 2020”, “American Heart Association 2020” and “ideal cardiovascular health” between January 2000 and October 2014. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if the proportions achieving ideal for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or ≥6 ideal CVH metrics were known or could be estimated. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted for US and non-US studies using a random effect model (REM). REM models were chosen because of the significant heterogeneity among studies. Results: Overall the pooled data consisted of 10 US cohorts with a total population of 94,761 participants and 6 non-US cohorts with a total of 130,242 participants. The table shows the pooled prevalence of ideal CVH factors in this population. Overall the pooled estimates of US cohorts showed 15% had 0-1 ideal CVH metrics (inter-study range: 7-22%), while 3% (inter-study range: 1-10%) had 6-7 ideal CVH metrics. This is comparable to 12% (inter-study range 1-17%) and 2% (inter-study range: 1-12%) for 0-1 and 6-7 ideal CVH metrics in the non-US studies. Conclusion: The proportion of persons achieving 6 or more ideal CVH metrics in both US and non-US cohorts is very low and the distribution of CVH metrics is similar in both US and non-US populations. Considering the strong association with worse outcomes, a coordinated global effort at improving CVH should be considered a priority.

Prudent Life-style for Children: Dietary Fat and Cholesterol

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
American Heart ◽  
Eating Habits ◽  
Saturated Fat ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Dietary Factors ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Food Groups ◽  
Monounsaturated Fat ◽  
Total Fat

In the 1983 AAP Committee on Nutrition statement, "Toward a Prudent Diet for Children," the evidence linking dietary factors with the risk of atherosclerosis was reviewed.1 Based on the analysis of the available information, the Committee made seven recommendations concerning steps to be taken during childhood that would reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in adults. With respect to childhood eating habits, it was noted that, after 1 year of age, a varied diet that includes items from each of the major food groups is the best assurance of nutritional adequacy. The dietary trends in the United States during the last few decades, with emphasis on decreased consumption of saturated fats, cholesterol, and salt and increased intake of polyunsaturated fats, were recommended as sensible when followed with moderation.1 OTHER FINDINGS Since publication of that Committee statement, recommendations for alteration of childhood diets have also been made by the American Heart Association, 2 by the American Health Foundation, 3 and by a Consensus Development panel sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).4 All three of these groups have recommended more restrictive childhood diets than had been recommended by the Committee on Nutrition. The American Heart Association2 recommends a total fat intake that would be approximately 30% of total calories; this 30% would include 10% or less from saturated fat, 10% from monounsaturated fat, and less than 10% from polyunsaturated fat. The recommendation for daily cholesterol intake was 100 mg/1,000 calories and not to exceed 300 mg/d, total. Similar recommendations have been made by the American Health Foundation3 to achieve a target goal of serum total cholesterol values averaging 140 mg/dL for children and young adults.

scholarly journals The Use of Sex-Specific Factors in the Assessment of Women’s Cardiovascular Risk

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (7) ◽  
pp. 592-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anandita Agarwala ◽  
Erin D. Michos ◽  
Zainab Samad ◽  
Christie M. Ballantyne ◽  
Salim S. Virani
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Increased Risk

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among women in the United States. As compared with men, women are less likely to be diagnosed appropriately, receive preventive care, or be treated aggressively for CVD. Sex differences between men and women have allowed for the identification of CVD risk factors and risk markers that are unique to women. The 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Multi-Society cholesterol guideline and 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline on the primary prevention of CVD introduced the concept of risk-enhancing factors that are specific to women and are associated with an increased risk of incident atherosclerotic CVD in women. These factors, if present, would favor more intensified lifestyle interventions and consideration of initiation or intensification of statin therapy for primary prevention to mitigate the increased risk. In this primer, we highlight sex-specific CVD risk factors in women, stress the importance of eliciting a thorough obstetrical and gynecological history during cardiovascular risk assessment, and provide a framework for how to initiate appropriate preventive measures when sex-specific risk factors are present.

scholarly journals One Grip a Little Stronger

2003 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 1014-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela W Duncan
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Stroke Rehabilitation ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Rehabilitation Research

Abstract Pamela W Duncan, PT, PhD, FAPTA Dr Duncan has actively participated in and contributed to physical therapist practice, physical therapist professional education, professional preparation of other health care providers, national policy development related to rehabilitation after stroke and aging, and scientific investigation. She has served several government appointments and provides leadership within several organizations. She served as co-chair of the Consensus Panel on Establishing Guidelines for Stroke Rehabilitation for the Agency for Health Care Policy, Research, and Education. She was a panel member on the National Institutes of Health's Total Hip Replacement Consensus Conference and served on the Strategic Planning Group for Stroke Research for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. She recently was appointed to serve on the Steering Committee of the Department of Education's National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and is currently on the Executive Leadership Council of the American Stroke Foundation and the Advisory Committee of the Canadian Stroke Network. She has served on committees and panels for the American Heart Association and was president of APTA's Neurology section. Dr Duncan's research activities focus on geriatric rehabilitation, stroke rehabilitation, and health outcomes measurement. She developed the Functional Reach Test, used to assess balance in older adults. In the past 20 years, she has received $13 million in research awards as principal investigator or co-investigator from agencies such as the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, American Heart Association, Department of Veteran's Affairs, and National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research and from multiple private funding sources. Dr Duncan has disseminated her research findings in more than 80 peer-reviewed articles in 20 different journals, and she has written a book and 12 book chapters. Dr Duncan's work has influenced the care and rehabilitation of patients in the United States and worldwide. Physical therapy education programs across the country incorporate her findings and professional vision into the preparation of the next generation of physical therapists. APTA has awarded Dr Duncan the Marian Williams Award for Research in Physical Therapy, the Catherine Worthingham Fellowship Award, and the Mary McMillan Scholarship Award. She has also received research awards from the APTA Neurology Section, Sports Physical Therapy Section, and Section on Geriatrics, as well as a service award from the Neurology Section. She is an elected fellow of the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association and has given 8 invited lectureships at universities across the United States.

scholarly journals 2019 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Duff ◽  
Alexis A. Topjian ◽  
Marc D. Berg ◽  
Melissa Chan ◽  
Sarah E. Haskell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Liaison Committee ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

This 2019 focused update to the American Heart Association pediatric basic life support guidelines follows the 2019 systematic review of the effects of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) on survival of infants and children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This systematic review and the primary studies identified were analyzed by the Pediatric Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. It aligns with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation’s continuous evidence review process, with updates published when the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation completes a literature review based on new published evidence. This update summarizes the available pediatric evidence supporting DA-CPR and provides treatment recommendations for DA-CPR for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Four new pediatric studies were reviewed. A systematic review of this data identified the association of a significant improvement in the rates of bystander CPR and in survival 1 month after cardiac arrest with DA-CPR. The writing group recommends that emergency medical dispatch centers offer DA-CPR for presumed pediatric cardiac arrest, especially when no bystander CPR is in progress. No recommendation could be made for or against DA-CPR instructions when bystander CPR is already in progress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document