Primer on Pulsed Electrical Field Ablation: Understanding the Benefits and Limitations

Author(s):  
Atul Verma ◽  
Samuel J. Asivatham ◽  
Thomas Deneke ◽  
Quim Castellvi ◽  
Robert E Neal

Pulsed electrical field (PEF) energy is a promising technique for catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. In this article, the key aspects that need to be considered for safe and effective PEF delivery are reviewed, and their impact on clinical feasibility is discussed. The most important benefit of PEF appears to be the ability to kill cells through mechanisms that do not alter stromal proteins, sparing sensitive structures to improve safety, without sacrificing cardiomyocyte ablation efficacy. Many parameters affect PEF treatment outcomes, including pulse intensity, waveform shape, and number of pulses, as well as electrode configuration and geometry. These physical and electrical characteristics must be titrated carefully to balance target tissue effects with collateral implications (muscle contraction, temperature rise, risk of electrical arcing events). It is important to note that any combination of parameters affecting PEF needs to be tested for clinical efficacy and safety. Applying PEF clinically requires knowledge of the fundamentals of this technology to exploit its opportunities and generate viable, durable health improvements for patients.

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3492
Author(s):  
Yahia Achour ◽  
Jacek Starzyński ◽  
Jacek Rąbkowski

The paper introduces a new design of Marx generator based on modular stages using Silicon Carbide MOSFETs (SiC-MOSFET) aimed to be used in biomedical applications. In this process, living cells are treated with intense nanosecond Pulsed Electrical Field (nsPEF). The electric field dose should be controlled by adjusting the pulse parameters such as amplitude, repetition rate and pulse-width. For this purpose, the structure of the proposed generator enables negative pulses with a quasi-rectangular shape, controllable amplitude, pulse-width and repetition-rate. A complete simulation study was conducted in ANSYS-Simplorer to verify the overall performance. A compact, modular prototype of Marx generator was designed with 1.7 kV rated SiC-MOSFETs and, finally, a set of experiments confirmed all expected features.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 58-67
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Shubik ◽  
M. M. Medvedev ◽  
M. A. Baturova ◽  
A. E. Rivin

The indications for Holter monitoring, which are included in the new Russian guidelines on cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disturbances, are considered. Possibilities of the diagnostic approaches of arrhythmias, management algorithms and treatment efficacy and safety monitoring are discussed.


1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 488-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinzhu Zhang ◽  
Tong Sun ◽  
Ya Chen ◽  
Shuhua Zhou ◽  
Yunjun Chen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Saiki ◽  
Takashi Hashizume ◽  
Kiyoshi Terayama

Catalysts ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1332
Author(s):  
Chung-Shin Yuan ◽  
Iau-Ren Ie ◽  
Ji-Ren Zheng ◽  
Chung-Hsuan Hung ◽  
Zu-Bei Lin ◽  
...  

This article reviews the fundamental theories and reaction mechanisms of photocatalytic technologies with the assistance of electrical field for degrading multi-phase pollutants. Photo(electro)catalysis including photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) and photoelectrocatalytic oxidation (PECO) have been a potential technologies applied for the treatment of organic and inorganic compounds in the wastewaters and waste gases, which has been treated as a promising technique by using semiconductors as photo(electro)catalysts to convert light or electrical energy to chemical energy. Combining photocatalytic processes with electrical field is an option to effectively decompose organic and inorganic pollutants. Although photocatalytic oxidation techniques have been used to decompose multi-phase pollutants, developing efficient advanced oxidation technologies (AOTs) by combining photocatalysis with electrical potential is urgently demanded in the future. This article reviews the most recent progress and the advances in the field of photocatalytic technologies combined with external electrical field, including the characterization of nano-sized photo(electro)catalysts, the degradation of multi-phase pollutants, and the development of electrical assisted photocatalytic technologies for the potential application on the treatment of organic and inorganic compounds in the wastewaters and waste gases. Innovative oxidation techniques regarding photo(electro)catalytic reactions with and without oxidants are included in this review article.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4S;23 (8;4S) ◽  
pp. S351-S366
Author(s):  
Vanessa B. Boralli

Background: Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are old drugs used against malaria, rheumatism, inflammation in the joints, lupus, among others. These drugs showed positive results in preliminary scientific research for treatment of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Since the studies with CQ and HCQ are initial with small patient populations, it is not yet known whether there are adverse effects from the use of CQ and HCQ for patients infected with the coronavirus. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ used against viral infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. Study Design: This is a narrative review of the traditional prescriptions of CQ and HCQ efficacy and adverse effects as well as their employment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Setting: In vitro and clinical studies comparing the antiviral efficacy and adverse effect profile of CQ and HCQ against COVID-19 in adult patients were evaluated. Methods: A systemic search of reviews, including in vitro and clinical trial studies in English focusing on CQ and HCQ effects and adverse effects against COVID-19 in the adult patient population from PubMed was performed. It included studies reporting chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine effects and adverse effects against COVID-19. Results: A total of 42 articles published between 2004 and April 2020 were reviewed for therapeutic use of CQ and HCQ. Both these drugs showed a significant in vitro potential against coronavirus. Many studies for clinical use of CQ and HCQ showed that patients presented adverse reactions on high doses. Limitations: Clinical studies have some methodology shortcomings, such as lack of information about the treatment and small number of experimental patients, leading to a misinterpretation of the data. Besides, there are few clinical studies with a limited sample size. Moreover, most of them did not present control groups, and some patients had died during these protocols. Discussion: Despite both CQ and HCQ in vitro antiviral evidence, clinically, both drugs, either alone or combined with other medications, may increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias, leading to cardiac arrest and sudden death. Besides, a lot of uncertainty still remains, such as starting administration period, dose prescribed, length of treatment, patients’ condition, concomitant drug use, among others. Conclusion: From the studies reviewed, it is not possible to state the precise efficacy and safety of CQ and HCQ use in the treatment of COVID-19 at any time in the course of the disease. Future studies are warranted. Key words: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; chloroquine; hydroxychloroquine; pandemic; coronavirus; adverse effects; side effects; cardiac arrhythmias; ocular toxicity, retinopathy; pharmacokinetic.


1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-80
Author(s):  
LG Futterman ◽  
L Lemberg

Use of percutaneous catheter ablation with radiofrequency current for cardiac arrhythmias is expanding rapidly. Technical ease, high success and low complication rates have allowed RFCA to become standard treatment for accessory AV connections and is the therapeutic procedure of choice for patients with atrioventricular node reentry tachycardias. Techniques still being investigated and evaluated for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias include laser catheter ablation, cryocatheter ablation and microwave catheter ablation. With further clinical experience, the efficacy and safety of these and other procedures can be determined.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shenasa ◽  
Hamid Assadi ◽  
Shahriar Heidary ◽  
Hossein Shenasa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document