Epidemiology of Peripheral Artery Disease and Polyvascular Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 128 (12) ◽  
pp. 1818-1832
Author(s):  
Aaron W. Aday ◽  
Kunihiro Matsushita

Atherosclerotic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is increasingly recognized as an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality that affects >230 million people worldwide. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including advanced age, smoking, and diabetes, are strongly linked to an increase risk of PAD. Although PAD has been historically underappreciated compared with coronary artery disease and stroke, greater attention on PAD in recent years has led to important new epidemiological insights in the areas of thrombosis, inflammation, dyslipidemia, and microvascular disease. In addition, the concept of polyvascular disease, or clinically evident atherosclerosis in multiple arterial beds, is increasingly identified as a particularly malignant cardiovascular disease worthy of special clinical attention and further study. It is noteworthy that PAD may increase the risk of adverse outcomes in similar or even greater magnitude than coronary disease or stroke. In this review, we highlight important new advances in the epidemiology of PAD with a particular focus on polyvascular disease, emerging biomarkers, and differential risk pathways for PAD compared with other atherosclerotic diseases.

Author(s):  
Marc D. Samsky ◽  
Anne Hellkamp ◽  
William R. Hiatt ◽  
F. Gerry R. Fowkes ◽  
Iris Baumgartner ◽  
...  

Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and heart failure (HF) are each independently associated with poor outcomes. Risk factors associated with new‐onset HF in patients with primary PAD are unknown. Furthermore, how the presence of HF is associated with outcomes in patients with PAD is unknown. Methods and Results This analysis examined risk relationships of HF on outcomes in patients with symptomatic PAD randomized to ticagrelor or clopidogrel as part of the EUCLID (Examining Use of Ticagrelor in Peripheral Arterial Disease) trial. Patients were stratified based on presence of HF at enrollment. Cox models were used to determine the association of HF with outcomes. A separate Cox model was used to identify risk factors associated with development of HF during follow‐up. Patients with PAD and HF had over twice the rate of concomitant coronary artery disease as those without HF. Patients with PAD and HF had significantly increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13–1.51) and all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19–1.63). In patients with PAD, the presence of HF was associated with significantly less bleeding (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45–0.96). Characteristics associated with HF development included age ≥66 (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.18–1.40 per 5 years), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.41–2.43), and weight (bidirectionally associated, ≥76 kg, HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64–0.93; <76 kg, HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07–1.16). Conclusions Patients with PAD and HF have a high rate of coronary artery disease with a high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events and death. These data support the possible need for aggressive treatment of (recurrent) atherosclerotic disease in PAD, especially patients with HF.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Levin ◽  
Derek Klarin ◽  
Themistocles L. Assimes ◽  
Matthew S. Freiberg ◽  
Erik Ingelsson ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTImportanceSmoking is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but the relative contribution to each subtype (coronary artery disease [CAD], peripheral artery disease [PAD], and large-artery stroke) remains less well understood.ObjectiveTo determine the effect of smoking on risk of coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and large-artery stroke.DesignMendelian randomization study using summary statistics from genome-wide associations of smoking (up to 462,690 individuals), coronary artery disease (up to 60,801 cases, 123,504 controls), peripheral artery disease (up to 24,009 cases, 150,983 controls), and large-artery stroke (up to 4,373 cases, 406,111 controls)SettingPopulation-based study of primarily European-ancestry individualsParticipantsParticipants in genome-wide association studies of smoking, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and stroke.ExposuresGenetic liability to smoking defined by lifetime smoking index: an integrated measure of smoking status, age at initiation, age at cessation, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and declining effect of smoking on health outcomes).Main Outcome MeasureRisk of coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and large-artery stroke.ResultsGenetic liability to smoking was associated with increased risk of PAD (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.78-2.56; P = 3.6 × 10−16), CAD (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.25-1.75; P = 4.4 × 10−6), and stroke (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.02-1.92; P = 0.036). Risk of PAD in smokers was greater than risk of large-artery stroke (pdifference = 0.025) or CAD (pdifference = 0.0041). The effect of smoking on ASCVD remained independent from the effects of smoking on traditional cardiovascular risk factors.Conclusions and RelevanceGenetic liability to smoking is a strong, causal risk factor for CAD, PAD, and stroke, although the effect of smoking is strongest for PAD. The effect of smoking is independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.


1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B Kannel

Most peripheral artery disease is of ischemic atherosclerotic etiology and manifested as intermittent claudication (IC). Death and disability from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a growing problem because of the rapidly increasing elderly segment of the population. By the year 2015 the elderly will constitute 14.8% of Americans. Of the total 255 million, 13.8 million are over age 75 years and 9 million are women. On reaching age 65 years, the average remaining lifetime is 17.4 years. In the USA this 11% of the population accounts for 29% of the health costs and 70% of all deaths are attributable to cardiovascular disease. About 9.6% of cardiovascular events are due to peripheral artery disease manifested as IC requiring 777 000 office visits and 63 000 hospitalizations. Also, 17 400 deaths each year are attributed directly to this cause. The biennial incidence of IC in the Framingham Study was 7.1 per 1000 for men and 3.6% for women, increasing with age in both sexes up to age 75 years. At all ages there is a distinct male predominance. In the 35–64-year age range IC incidence is virtually identical to that of cardiac failure and stroke, but only one-third of CHD incidence. Beyond age 65 years IC incidence is only half that of other atherosclerotic cardiovascular conditions. The incidence of carotid bruits and non-palpable pedal pulses is virtually identical in the two sexes; only femoral bruits are male predominant. At time of diagnosis of IC one in three already have overt evidence of CHD, stroke or congestive heart failure (CHF). In those free of these at outset CHD and strokes occur at two to three times the general population rate and CHF 3.5–4.5 times the rate of persons without IC. Within 10 years of IC onset 43% develop CHD, 21% strokes and 24% cardiac failure. Carotid and femoral bruits are likewise harbingers of other atherosclerotic CVD. As many as 45% of IC victims lose their symptoms for extended periods. Survival following onset of IC is only two-thirds of that of the general population; after 10 years 60% died. This high mortality is largely attributable to coexistent cardiovascular impairments. A risk profile comprising the major cardiovascular risk factors predicts occurrence of IC even better than CHD. IC risk increases progressively with burden of the risk factors. With an aging population of increased size peripheral artery disease is a problem of increasing dimensions. Attention to comorbid conditions is essential if survival is to be improved. Because IC shares many of the same risk factors, measures to prevent CHD, CHF and strokes should also reduce IC risk.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venexia Walker ◽  
Marijana Vujkovic ◽  
Alice R Carter ◽  
Neil M Davies ◽  
Miriam Udler ◽  
...  

Background: Type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease share several risk factors. However, it is unclear whether the effect of these risk factors on liability to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is independent of their effect on liability to type 2 diabetes. Methods: We performed univariate Mendelian randomization to quantify the effects of continuous risk factors from the IEU OpenGWAS database on liability to three outcomes: type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, and peripheral artery disease, as well as the effects of liability to type 2 diabetes on the risk factors. We also performed two-step Mendelian randomization for mediation to estimate the mediating pathways between the risk factors, liability to type 2 diabetes, and liability to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes where possible. Results: We found evidence for 53 risk factors as causes of liability to coronary artery disease, including eight which were causes of liability to type 2 diabetes only and four which were consequences only. Except for fasting insulin and hip circumference, the direct and total effects from the two-step Mendelian randomization were similar. This suggests that the combination of these risk factors with liability to type 2 diabetes was unlikely to alter liability to coronary artery disease beyond their individual effects. We also found 13 risk factors that were causes of liability peripheral artery disease, including six which were causes of liability to type 2 diabetes only and four which were consequences only. Again, the direct and total effects were similar for these ten risk factors apart from fasting insulin. Conclusions: Most risk factors were likely to affect liability to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease independently of their relationship with liability to type 2 diabetes. Control of modifiable risk factors therefore remains important for reducing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk regardless of patient liability to type 2 diabetes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (38) ◽  
pp. 4511-4515 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Koutsoumpelis ◽  
C. Argyriou ◽  
K.M. Tasopoulou ◽  
E.I. Georgakarakos ◽  
G.S. Georgiadis

Background: Peripheral artery disease is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis which strongly correlates to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In addition, the progression of peripheral artery disease leads to an increased risk of limb loss. In order to reduce these events, the benchmark of treatment and research over the last years has been the antiplatelet therapy which aims at inhibition of platelet aggregation. Over the last years, new studies combining antiplatelet agents in different therapeutic schemes have been proven efficacious. Unfortunately, patients remain still at high risk of CV events. Novel Oral Anticoagulants have been introduced as alternatives to warfarin, in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. The rationale of using medication which acts on platelet activation and the coagulation pathway of thrombosis has led investigators to examine the role of Noac's in preventing CV events in patients with peripheral artery disease, stable or unstable. Methods: The aim of this study is to review the current evidence with respect to recently published studies concerning the use of Novel anticoagulants in peripheral artery disease. Results: The Compass trial has shown that a combination of rivaroxaban with traditional therapy may produce promising results in reducing amputation rates, stroke, cardiac events, and mortality, however, there are still safety issues with bleeding requiring acute care. The ePAD study has provided us with insight concerning safety and efficacy after peripheral angioplasty or stenting and actually the need for further research. The Voyager Pad study, following the steps of Compass, is studying the effect and safety of the addition of rivaroxaban to traditional therapy in the highest risk population aka patients undergoing peripheral revascularization. The evidence concerning patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation appears to be insufficient, however, recent guidelines propose the use of novel oral anticoagulants. Conclusion: For the time being, novel oral anticoagulants in combination with aspirin may provide an alternative treatment in PAD, however, it is deemed necessary to identify patient subgroups who will benefit the most.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document