Rape: A Problem of Crime Classification in Islamic Law

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-438
Author(s):  
Azman Mohd Noor

AbstractIn Islam, rape is considered a serious sexual crime. Since it consists of forced sexual intercourse, most of the classical jurists called it zinā bī l-ikrāh, that is, forced unlawful sexual intercourse. The question arises whether rape is part of zinā or an isolated crime. This article focuses on the notion of rape, including a definition of this crime, its punishments, and a comparison between rape and zinā in Islamic jurisprudence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Moh Khasan

The issue of the escalation of crime, which is increasingly varied and is getting heavier, is becoming a global concern. The development and progress of the world seems to have contributed to changes in the type and quality of crime, not only in the form and method, but also in the damage it causes. Crime trends increasingly point to collective crimes, systematic crimes, and crimes with extensive and massive excess damage. This article intends to criticize the systematic change (evolution) that has occurred in the concept of ḥirābah crime in Islamic law from a classical to contemporary perspective. The qualitative analysis of this article is focused on three fundamental issues, namely; ḥirābah interpretation, ḥirābah liability, and ḥirābah punishment. The author reveals in the conclusion that; first, based on its elements and characteristics, the definition of ḥirābah can be expanded to include new types of crimes such as; terrorism, rape, and drug trafficking and smuggling. Second, it is necessary to reconstruct the ḥirābah responsibility theory into a formulation that considers the principle of legal certainty and the principle of equality before the law. The reconstruction model, among others, is the affirmation that all people who involve themselves in the crime are perpetrators of ḥirābah (with an ishtirāk approach). Likewise, reconstruction efforts are needed to enforce equality of accountability between male and female actors. Third, as a serious crime, ḥirābah deserves a severe punishment and has a strong deterrent effect, as offered by Islamic law. However, the opportunity to give dispensation to the punishment will always be open if the perpetrator can prove his seriousness in repenting.[Eskalasi kriminalitas yang semakin beragam dan berat telah menjadi perhatian global saat ini. Pembangunan dan kemajuan dunia berkontribusi pada perubahan pola dan tingkat kriminalitas, tidak hanya bentuk dan cara, tetapi juga akibat yang ditimbulkan. Trend kriminalitas bertambah mulai dari yang berkelompok, sistematis, hingga yang kerusakannya masif dan pengaruhnya panjang. Tulisan ini mengkritisi perubahan sistematis pada konsep kriminal (ḥirābah) dalam hukum Islam dari pendekatan klasik hingga kontemporer. Analisis kualitatif dalam tulisan ini fokus pada tiga hal mendasar yaitu penafsiran, arah kecenderungan dan hukuman. Kesimpulan pertama tulisan ini adalah definisi kriminal berdasarkan unsur dan karakternya yang dapat meluas maknanya termasuk terorisme, pemerkosaan, narkoba, dan penyelundupan. Kedua, perlu rekonstruksi baru teori kriminalitas yang mempertimbangkan kepastian hukum dan kesetaraan hak dimuka hukum. Ketiga, sebagai kejahatan serius, ḥirābah pantas mendapat hukuman berat dan mempunyai efek pencegahan yang kuat seperti halnya dalam hukum Islam. Meski demikian, ada peluang dispensasi hukuman jika pelaku dapat menunjukkan kesungguhan untuk bertobat.]


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-30
Author(s):  
Nurhayati Nurhayati

Rape is a sexual crime that indicates highly enough rate in Indonesia. Rape according to the view of Islamic law is different from adultery. Adultery is sexual intercourses between man and woman without legal marriage and carried out consciously on the basis of mutual needs. Rape is not doing of just sexual intercourse but it has additional element that is carried out with force, violence or threats. Sanctions against rapists according to Islamic law is exactly the same as the act of adultery that is stoning and damping. Such sanctions apply only to rapists and not to the victim. Aceh’s Qānūn on Jināyat (criminal) law for the people is regulated in Regional Regulation (PERDA) No. 6 of 2014. Qānūn Jināyat for the people of Aceh is a unity of  criminal law formed based on Islamic Shari'ah values ​​derived from the Qur’an and Ḥadīṡ. According to Qānūn Jināyat Aceh, everyone doing sexual rape crime is threatened with ‘uqūbat ta’zīr which in its application there is a difference of punishment  with what is in the view of  Islamic law.


Author(s):  
Fahad Khamis Ahmad Al-Fahdi

This research aims at clarifying the significance of and studying and establishing the jurisprudential maxims, especially those related to the judiciary so that they help judges in their work, muftis in their understanding and students in their memorization. The maxim of (Translator’s Statement is Absolutely Accepted) is a great maxim since it represents a principle in the judicial ruling. This research is a new addition to the comparative jurisprudential literature, an approach between Islamic jurisprudence and contemporary law, and a manifestation of the greatness of Islamic Sharia that cares for all aspects of life. This research is divided into two subjects: First: the definition of terms such as maxim, jurisprudence and law in three sections. Second: the explanation and establishment of the maxim and the legal status in four sections, as well as the judicial applications. The researcher concludes the study with the most important results, that of the jurisprudential maxims combine different issues in simple eloquent phrases, and that the procedures law has noble Sharia purposes, represented in caring for the interests of people and achieving the highest meanings of integrity and justice. The Islamic jurisprudence pays attention to the maxims of the rules of procedures more than the positive laws do. The law considers the Islamic Jurisprudence regarding the translator issue, unless in oath-taking. Translators shall be fair, familiar with both languages, and accepts a single statement. Among the most important recommendations: the provisions of jurisprudential maxims shall be contained in bills, and the judges shall consider the maxim in all filed cases. In addition, education courses should be held for translators so that they know the procedures of the progress of cases in courts, and the criticality of accuracy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-90
Author(s):  
Shahzeb Shahid

This paper tends to examine the nature of rape crime under Islamic law in order to take sterner action against this crime in line with Islamic law. As the Holy Quran does not directly deal with rape crime, for this reason, there is a wide range of disagreement among jurists regarding the issue of rape crime. Rape is not a single dimension issue, therefore, this paper is meant to shed light on issues related to rape such as whether or not rape is a separate crime? When does sexual intercourse amount to rape? What does Islam prescribe punishment for a person who is coerced to commit rape? Does Islam permit abortion for raped women? Why marital rape does not exist in Islam? Whether rapists may be awarded the punishment of lashes, Imprisonment or death as t‘azir or syasah?   This paper finds out what Zina (fornication) is under Islamic law because in Islamic jurisprudence only coerced Zina is regarded as rape. Thus, this paper is classifying rape in the same category as Zina. By classifying rape as a subset of Zina can only sort out the juridical issues that are emanating from coerced Zina. However, Some modern scholars put rape in a category of Hirabbah crime in order to circumvent the strict evidentiary procedure of Zina(fornication) crime. This paper depicts that there is no need to put rape in the domain of Hirabah because Islamic law permits the ruler or legislation to award punishment of lashes or death as Tazir or Syasah without waiting for the four pious Muslim male eye witness and inflicting Hadd of Qadaf(slander) to the complainant. Finally, this paper is exploring the options that may be taken in order to nip this crime in the bud.


2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 299
Author(s):  
M. Aunul Hakim

<p class="Bodytext60">Indonesia is a state with a Criminal Code named KUHP. The regulation draft about adultery is especially mentioned at paragraph 284. According to this paragraph, the definition of adultery is sexual intercourse conducted by a man/woman who has valid marriage with another woman/man who is not his/her wife/husband and it is conducted based on the wish of each of them. In Criminal Code, it is stated that such deed may be imposed as a crime if there is a plea from the wife/husband who is harmed. Adultery crime is called as offense that warrants complaint, and punishment is nine months. It is different from the meaning of adultery according to Islamic Law which has meaning a sexual intercourse conducted by a man and woman who are not a valid pair of marriage. Besides, the criminal code was established based on rationale consideration. While the objective of legal realism is to construct the law which is more responsive toward the social need. Therefore KUHP regulation on adultery should be revisited to accomodate the Islamic values held by moslem as the dominant citizen in Indonesia.    </p><p class="Bodytext60"> </p><p class="Bodytext60">Indonesia adalah negara dengan KUHP yang bernama KUHP. Rancangan peraturan tentang perzinahan terutama disebutkan pada paragraf 284. Menurut paragraf ini, definisi perzinahan adalah hubungan seksual yang dilakukan oleh seorang pria / wanita yang memiliki pernikahan yang sah dengan wanita / pria lain yang bukan isteri / suami dan istrinya. dilakukan berdasarkan keinginan masing-masing. Dalam KUHP, dinyatakan bahwa akta tersebut dapat dikenakan sebagai tindak pidana jika ada permintaan dari istri / suami yang dirugikan. Kejahatan perzinahan disebut sebagai pelanggaran yang menjamin pengaduan, dan hukuman sembilan bulan. Hal ini berbeda dengan makna perzinahan menurut Hukum Islam yang memiliki arti hubungan seksual yang dilakukan oleh pria dan wanita yang bukan pasangan perkawinan yang sah. Selain itu, kode pidana didirikan berdasarkan pertimbangan rasional. Sedangkan tujuan realisme hukum adalah membangun undang-undang yang lebih responsif terhadap kebutuhan sosial. Oleh karena itu peraturan KUHP tentang perzinahan harus ditinjau kembali untuk mengakomodasi nilai-nilai Islam yang dimiliki umat Islam sebagai warga negara yang dominan di Indonesia.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-43
Author(s):  
Ahmad Syaripudin ◽  
M. Kasim

This study aimed to describe the basic concept of consensus as source of Islamic law. The description of basic concept of consensus consists of: 1) definition of consensus; 2) status of consensus as a fundament of Islamic knowledge and law; 3) types of consensus; 4) examples of consensus in terms of classical and contemporary Islamic jurisprudence; and 5) law of refutation against consensus. The research applied a qualitative-descriptive approach with library research methods combined with content analysis of a number of books and related articles. The results show that: 1) consensus is an agreement of scholars of mujtahid among the people of Prophet Muhammad saw. on an shari issue that is not obviously found in the Koran and hadis in the period after the Prophet which has specific pillars and conditions; 2) of consensus in its position as a source of knowledge and Islamic law is in the third row after the Koran and hadis; 3) types of consensus include ṣarīh consensus and sukūtī consensus, and some divides it into qat’i consensus and dzanni consensus; 4) some examples of consensus: a) forms of classical Islamic jurisprudence consensus: the agreement of the scholars regarding the prohibition of marrying grandmother and granddaughter, that grandson and son are in one position in terms of inheritance division, that inheritance portion for grandmother is one sixth if there is no mother, and consensus of the companions to codify the Koran owing to benefits that appeared during the caliphate of Abu Bakr al-Shiddiq ra. b) Forms of contemporary Islamic jurisprudence: validity of human organ transplants, brain death, animal and human cloning, joint-stock companies, stock exchanges, globalization, and compliance with international institutions, regulations and laws such as world education organizations and world trade organizations; and 5) law of those who refute consensus in absolute manner (totality) are considered disbelievers.


2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-623
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hasan

This article explores moderate and eclectic traditionalism beyond Kiai Haji Muhammad Hashim Ash’ari’s contribution in the shariah and Islamic jurisprudence of social politic (Fiqh al-Siyâsah al-Ijtimâ’iyah) in Indonesia. It is conceptual research referring to some of his works as well as discussion about his thought among Islamic scholars. Based on definition of moderation from the Qur’an, hadith, and some scholars’ opinion, Hashim can be best categorized as Islamic traditionalist figure who enforced both moderation and eclecticism. However, he maintained distinctive features compared to both traditionalist and modernist Islamic figures. It is mainly clear from both his thought and movement which rely on the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah in theology, four fiqh school leaders (Hanafiyah, Malikiyah, Syafi’iyah dan Hambaliyah), and thariqah sufiyah mu’tabarah. Additionally, he showed appreciation and promoted for adaptation to both local and foreign idea that later inspired distinctive religiosity in Indonesia. This particularly applies in the concept of relation between Islamic law and nationalism, jihad, political fiqh and governmental system in Islam. تستكشف هذه الورقة الوسطية التقليدية والانتقائية التي ساهمها كياهي حاجي محمد هاشم الأشعري في الشريعة الإسلامية وفقه السياسة الاجتماعية. إنه بحث مفاهيمي يشير إلى بعض أعماله وكذلك مناقشة حول أفكاره كعلماء المسلمين. بناءً على تعريف الوسطية من القرآن والحديث وبعض آراء العلماء، يمكن تصنيف هاشم بشكل أفضل على أنه الشخصية الإسلامية التقليدية التي فرضت الوسطية والانتقائية. ومع ذلك، فقد حافظ على سمات مميزة مقارنة بكل من الشخصيات الإسلامية التقليدية والحداثية. يتضح بشكل أساسي من فكره وحركته اللذين يعتمدان على أهل السنة والجماعة في العقيدة، قادة المذاهب الفقهية الأربعة (حنفية، المالكية، الشافعية والحبلية) والطريقة الصوفية المعتبرة. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، أظهر التقدير والترويج للتكيف مع الأفكار المحلية والأجنبية التي ألهمت لاحقًا التدين المميز في إندونيسيا. وهذا ينطبق بشكل خاص على مفهوم العلاقة بين الشريعة الإسلامية والوطنية والجهاد وفقه السياسية والنظام الحكومي في الإسلام.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pardan Syafrudin

The Common properties (community property) is an asset that the husband and wife acquired during the household lifes, which both of them is agree that after united through marriage bonds, that the property produced by one or both of them will be common property. It shows, that if there's an agreement between husband and wife before marriage (did not to unify their property), then the property produced both will not become a joint treasure. Thus, if a husband or wife dies, or divorces, then the property owned by both of them can be distributed in accordance with their respective shares, another case when the two couples are not making an agreement, then the property gained during marriage bonds can be divided into types of communal property. In Islamic law, this kind of treasure is not contained in the Qur'an or Sunnah. Nor in Islamic jurisprudence. However, Islamic law legalizes the existence of common property as long as it is applicable in a society and the benefit in the distribution of such property. In contrast to the positive law, this property types have been regulated and described in the Marriage Law, as well as the Islamic Law Compilations, which became the legal restriction in the affairs of marriage in force in Indonesia. In this study, the author tries to compile the existence of common property according to the Islamic law reviews and positive law.


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-141
Author(s):  
Abdullah Muhammad al-Shami

In Islamic law judgements on any human action are usually evaluated in terms of the intention involved. Accordingly, the rules of substantive issues have to be accommodated under the basic principles of Islamic jurisprudence. The understanding of these principles by the juristic scholar is highly rewarding because it will lead the muftī to the right path in deriving legal opinions from the original sources. The basic principle of Islamic jurisprudence, which stipulates that ‘all actions depend on intentions,’ has played an important role in the construction of Islamic jurisprudence. Moreover, this rule has a special place in the theory of Islamic legal contract. So what is the effect of intention in the validity of human actions and legal contracts? It is known that pure intention has significant effects on spiritual worship and legal contracts of transaction. It also gives guidance for earning rewards from Almighty Allah. This article concentrates on the effect of intention in perpetual worship, the concept of action and intention in Islamic legal works, the kind of contract with all its components, and the jurists' views on the effects of intention in human action and legal contract along with their discussion and counter-arguments.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
Siah Khosyi’ah

The division of marital joint property after the breakup of marriage, whether dropping out of marriage due to divorce or due to death, is a new thing in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). This is because the concept of mutual treasure is not known in the books of classical Islamic jurisprudence of Muslim scholars of the schools at their times, in which their work are always made as referral in the legal cases up to the present days. In Indonesia, the distribution of common property is regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Laws Articles 96 and 97, which stipulate the rules of distribution of joint property for married couples whose married are off as a result of divorce or death. Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law actually provides an overview of the flexibility of the distribution of common marital property, including in certain cases because the article is regulating (regelen) rather than forcing (dwigen), so that the division is not absolutely divided equally between husband and wife, and casuistically the provisions of that article may be disregarded.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document