Study of Fe3O4-PPy Core-Shell Nanocomposite in the Diagnosis of Tumor Markers in the Tissues of Early Gastric Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 935-942
Author(s):  
Jiang Wu ◽  
Tao Wu ◽  
Peng Chen ◽  
Lan Pang ◽  
A Bu Du Re He Man-A Li Mu Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Carbohydrate Antigen ◽  
Detection Sensitivity ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Core Shell ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Gastric Tissue

In order to study Fe3O4-Polypyrrole (Fe3O4-PPy) core-shell nanocomposite in the diagnosis of tumor markers in the diseased gastric tissues of early cancer patients, a total of 160 cases of patients, who were confirmed as early gastric cancer by gastroscopy or postoperative pathology at a designated hospital of the study from December 2014 to December 2018, were selected as research objects and were divided into two groups of observation and control group with 80 cases in each group. For each patient in the two groups, two pieces of diseased gastric tissue were firstly taken through gastroscopy; then the observation group applied Fe3O4-PPy with the particle diameter of 150-350 nm as carrier to detect the contents of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) in the diseased gastric tissue, while the control group directly detected the contents of corresponding tumor markers; after the detections, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic efficiency of each marker in the two groups of patients were calculated, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves with the areas under the curves (AUC) were drawn to analyze the correlation between the level of Fe3O4-PPy and the detection efficiency of gastric cancer markers. The results show that the detection sensitivity (82.17%, 80.32%, 79.48%, 84.63%, and 85.66%) and specificity (76.75%, 79.66%, 81.07%, 83.47%, and 85.24%) of CA19-9, AFP, CA242, CEA, and CA72-4 in the tumor tissue of patients in observation group for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer are higherthan the sensitivity (78.66%, 79.25%, 76.18%, 82.11%, and 83.45%) and specificity (74.37%, 76.94%, 77.24%, 81.22%, and 81.59%) of that in control group with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Therefore, it is believed that the Fe3O4-PPy is of great significance for the detection of early gastric tumor markers in the tissues of patients with early gastric cancer, and has certain value for the auxiliary diagnosis of early gastric cancer and the observation of therapeutic effects. This study results provide a reference for the further researches of Fe3O4-PPy in the diagnosis of tumor markers in patients with early gastric cancer.

scholarly journals Association of Multiple Tumor Markers With Gastric Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyang Li ◽  
Sifeng Li ◽  
Zhenqi Zhang ◽  
Dandan Huang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Detection Sensitivity ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
And Control ◽  
Combined Detection ◽  
Positive Population

Abstract Background: To explore the correlation between multiple tumor markers and gastric cancer.Methods: We selected 268 newly-treated patients with gastric cancer and 209 healthy subjects for correlation research. The detection of multiple tumor markers was based on protein chip, and then the results were statistically analyzed by SPSS.Results: (1)We concluded that gastric cancer was significantly related to gender, age, AFP, CEA, CA125, CA199, and CA242 (P＜0.001). After CA199 and CA242 were stratified by gender, the OR of the male was 30.400 and 31.242 respectively, while the OR of the female was 3.424. After CA125 was stratified by age, among patients with gastric cancer over 54 years old, The risk of occurrence in the CA125-positive population was 16.673 times that in CA125-negative patient; and among patients less than or equal to 54 years old, CA125-positive was not a risk factor for gastric cancer(P=0.082); (2)AFP, CEA, CA125, CA199, CA242 in M1 stage were statistically significant compared with M0 stage and control group (P<0.001), but AFP (P=0.045) and CA125 (P=0.752) were not statistically significant compared with M0 stage and control group; (3)The combined detection sensitivity of multiple tumor markers were 41.79%.Conclusions: Our research shows that gastric cancer is associated with age, gender, and the positive of AFP, CEA, CA125, CA199, and CA242. The positive of AFP and CA125 is related to the distant metastasis of gastric cancer; The combined detection of multiple tumor markers can be used for initial screening of gastric cancer to a certain extent.

scholarly journals OncoVee™-MiniPDX-Guided Anticancer Treatment for Gastric Cancer Patients With Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutong Ge ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Wei Liang ◽  
Cuiju Tang ◽  
Dongying Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Analysis ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
And Control

BackgroundIt is estimated that 35% of gastric cancer patients appear with synchronous distant metastases—the vast majority of patients presenting with metastatic hepatic disease. How to choose the most appropriate drugs or regimens is crucial to improve the prognosis of patients. We conducted this retrospective cohort analysis to evaluate the efficacy of OncoVee™-MiniPDX-guided treatment for these patients.MethodsGastric cancer patients with liver metastases (GCLM) were enrolled. Patients were divided into MiniPDX and control group according to their wishes. In the observation group, the OncoVee™-MiniPDX model was conducted to screen the most sensitive drug or regimens to determine the clinical administration. Meanwhile, patients were treated with regular medications in the control group according to the guidelines without the MiniPDX model. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 68 patients with GCLM were included, with the observation and control groups of 21 and 47 patients, respectively. The baseline characteristics of patients were balanced between these two groups. MiniPDX drug sensitivity tests were associated with the increased use of targeted drugs when compared with the control group (33.3 vs. 0%, p=0.032). Median OS was estimated to be 9.4 (95% CI, 7.9–11.2) months and 7.9 (95% CI, 7.2–8.7) months in the observation and control group, respectively. Both univariate (control group vs. MiniPDX group: HR=2.586, 95% CI= 1.362–4.908, p=0.004) and multivariate regression analyses (Control group vs. MiniPDX group: adjusted HR (aHR)=4.288, 95% CI= 1.452–12.671, p=0.008) showed the superiority of the observation group on OS. Similarly, MiniPDX-based regiments significantly improve the PFS of these cases (median PFS 6.7 months vs. 4.2 months, aHR=2.773, 95% CI=1.532–3.983, p=0.029). ORR and DCR were also improved in MiniPDX group comparing with control group (ORR, 57.14 vs. 25.53%, p=0.029; DCR: 85.71 vs. 68.08%, p=0.035).ConclusionOncoVee™-MiniPDX model, which was used to select drugs to guide antitumor treatment, was promising to prolong survival and improve the response rate of patients with GCLM. Further well-designed studies are needed to confirm the clinical benefits of MiniPDX.

scholarly journals Study on the Differential Value of Tumor Marker CA724 on Primary Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Jieying Ding ◽  
Han Zhang ◽  
Zixian Wu
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Marker ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Primary Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

We investigated the diagnostic value of the tumor marker CA724 in patients with primary gastric cancer. One hundred forty-six patients with primary gastric cancer were selected as the observation group; 89 patients with gastritis treated in the same period were included in the control group 1; 91 patients with healthy physical examination during the same period were included in the control group 2. Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay was used to determine the level of carbohydrate antigen CA724 in each group; the pathological data of the observation group were consulted, and the expression level of tumor marker CA724 under different pathological conditions was analyzed; ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic value of CA724 in gastric cancer and gastritis. The level of CA724 in primary gastric cancer patients was significantly correlated with tumor diameter, tumor stage, differentiation type, and lymph node metastasis. The ROC curve was drawn with a CA724 cutoff value of 7.94 U/Ml. The AUC value of CA724 in primary gastric cancer patients was 0.815, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 84.68% and a specificity of 71.95%. In conclusion, CA724 was highly expressed in patients with primary gastric cancer, which can achieve the diagnostic differentiation of gastric cancer and gastritis, and obtain a high diagnostic efficiency, providing a reference basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

scholarly journals Association of Multiple Tumor Markers with gastric cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyang Li ◽  
Sifeng Li ◽  
Zhenqi Zhang ◽  
Dandan Huang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Detection Sensitivity ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
And Control ◽  
Combined Detection ◽  
Positive Population

Abstract BackgroundTo explore the correlation between multiple tumor markers and gastric cancer. MethodsWe selected 268 newly-treated patients with gastric cancer and 209 healthy subjects for correlation research. The detection of multiple tumor markers was based on protein chip, and then the results were statistically analyzed by SPSS. Results(1)We concluded that gastric cancer was significantly related to gender, age, AFP, CEA, CA125, CA199, and CA242 (P＜0.001). After CA199 and CA242 were stratified by gender, the OR of the male was 30.400 and 31.242 respectively, while the OR of the female was 3.424. After CA125 was stratified by age, among patients with gastric cancer over 54 years old, The risk of occurrence in the CA125-positive population was 16.673 times that in CA125-negative patient; and among patients less than or equal to 54 years old, CA125-positive was not a risk factor for gastric cancer(P=0.082); (2)AFP, CEA, CA125, CA199, CA242 in M1 stage were statistically significant compared with M0 stage and control group (P<0.001), but AFP (P=0.045) and CA125 (P=0.752) were not statistically significant compared with M0 stage and control group; (3)The combined detection sensitivity of multiple tumor markers were 41.79%.ConclusionsOur research shows that gastric cancer is associated with age, gender, and the positive of AFP, CEA, CA125, CA199, and CA242. The positive of AFP and CA125 is related to the distant metastasis of gastric cancer; The combined detection of multiple tumor markers can be used for initial screening of gastric cancer to a certain extent.

scholarly journals Short-Term Efficacy and Quality of Life of Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy Assisted by External Vision

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jian Zheng ◽  
Yingwei Xue ◽  
Chunfeng Li
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Radical Gastrectomy ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
Better Than

Objective. To evaluate the clinical effects and survival prognosis of radical gastrectomy assisted by external vision in gastric cancer. Methods. A total of 60 hospitalized gastric cancer patients from June 2016 to December 2018 were selected and divided into the observation group and control group according to different surgical procedures. The control group was treated with traditional open radical gastrectomy, while the observation group was treated with radical gastrectomy assisted by an external vision microscope. Relevant surgical indicators, visual analogue scale (VAS), postoperative complications, and life quality assessment were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results. The incision length and intraoperative blood loss in the observation group were smaller than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ); compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly shorter hospital stay, earlier postoperative first exhaust time, and lower gastric fluid volume at the 3rd day after surgery ( P < 0.05 ). The pain scores of the observation group at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery were lower than those of the control group ( P < 0.05 ), and the difference was significant. The quality of life scores at the 1st week and 12th week after surgery showed that the dysphagia symptom scores of the observation group and the control group were significantly reduced but the two groups had significant differences in fatigue, physical function, pain score, postoperative pain, and overall quality of life. The observation group was significantly better than the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Follow-up studies showed no significant difference between mortality and cancer recurrence ( P > 0.05 ); the patients recovered well at postoperation, and the diet of the observation group was better than that of the control group ( P < 0.05 ); gastric reflux and knife pain were less than those of the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Radical gastrectomy assisted by external vision for gastric cancer yields clinical benefits for gastric cancer patients, which not only dramatically shortened the length of hospital stay but also effectively ameliorated the quality of life of patients, all indicating that external vision-assisted surgery was significantly better than traditional gastrectomy in improving the postoperative quality of life of gastric cancer patients in the absence of increasing the risk of adverse events.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF SERUM CAVEOLIN-1 LEVELS IN GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Tas ◽  
S Karabulut ◽  
K Erturk ◽  
D Duranyildiz
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Caveolin 1 ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Aim: Caveolin-1 plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of various carcinomas and its expression affects the survival of cancer patients. However, the molecular function of caveolin-1 and its possible clinical importance has remained uncertain in gastric cancer. No clinical trial has examined serum caveolin-1 levels in gastric cancer patients so far, instead all available results were provided from studies conducted on tissue samples. In the current study, we analyzed the soluble serum caveolin-1 levels in gastric cancer patients, and specified its associations with the clinical factors and prognosis. Material and Methods: Sixty-three patients with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer were enrolled into the trial. Serum caveolin-1 concentrations were detected by ELISA method. Thirty healthy subjects were also included in the study. Results: The median age of patients was 62 years, ranging from 28 to 82 years. The serum caveolin-1 levels in gastric cancer patients were significantly higher than those in control group (p < 0.001). The common clinical parameters including patient age, sex, lesion localization, histopathology, histological grade, disease stage, and various serum tumor markers (e.g. LDH, CEA, and CA 19.9) were not found to be associated with serum caveolin-1 levels (p > 0.05). Similarly, no correlation existed between serum caveolin-1 concentration and chemotherapy responsiveness (p = 0.93). Furthermore, serum caveolin-1 level was not found to have a prognostic role (p = 0.16). Conclusion: Even though it is neither predictive nor prognostic, serum caveolin-1 level may be a valuable diagnostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer. Key

scholarly journals Effect of respiratory training apparatus and vibration expectoration vest on expectoration in patients with lung cancer resection

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-289
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jing Guo ◽  
Li-Li Wei ◽  
Xin-Hui Li ◽  
Ning- Ning Yu ◽  
Shao-Bo Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Respiratory Function ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Pulmonary Atelectasis ◽  
Cancer Resection ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Respiratory Training

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to explore the safe and effective method of expectoration in the preoperative period of patients with lung cancer resection and to promote the rehabilitation of patients. Methods A total of 100 cases of lung cancer patients undergoing elective surgery were divided into the observation group and the control group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with vibration expectoration vest for expectoration during the perioperative period, and the observation group was treated with respiratory function exerciser that has expectoration function in the perioperative period, three times a day, and the effect was evaluated after 5 days. Results The number of patients in the observation group after the first expectoration time was significantly less than that of the control group (P<0.001). Pain score, pulmonary atelectasis, and pulmonary infection rate of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group; the hospitalization time was significantly shorter than that of the control group; and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions Lobectomy for lung cancer patients with perioperative respiratory training for respiratory function exercise, compared with conventional methods, is helpful for postoperative expectoration and to reduce the incidence of adverse events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document