Contrasting Spring and Summer Large-Scale Environments Associated with Mesoscale Convective Systems over the U.S. Great Plains

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (20) ◽  
pp. 6749-6767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengfei Song ◽  
Zhe Feng ◽  
L. Ruby Leung ◽  
Robert A. Houze Jr. ◽  
Jingyu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Great Plains ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Convective Available Potential Energy ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Self Organizing Maps ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
The U.S

Abstract Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are frequently observed over the U.S. Great Plains during boreal spring and summer. Here, four types of synoptically favorable environments for spring MCSs and two types each of synoptically favorable and unfavorable environments for summer MCSs are identified using self-organizing maps (SOMs) with inputs from observational data. During spring, frontal systems providing a lifting mechanism and an enhanced Great Plains low-level jet (GPLLJ) providing anomalous moisture are important features identified by SOM analysis for creating favorable dynamical and thermodynamic environments for MCS development. During summer, the composite MCS environment shows small positive convective available potential energy (CAPE) and convective inhibition (CIN) anomalies, which are in stark contrast with the large positive CAPE and negative CIN anomalies in spring. This contrast suggests that summer convection may occur even with weak large-scale dynamical and thermodynamic perturbations so MCSs may be inherently less predictable in summer. The two synoptically favorable environments identified in summer have frontal characteristics and an enhanced GPLLJ, but both shift north compared to spring. The two synoptically unfavorable environments feature enhanced upper-level ridges, but differ in the strength of the GPLLJ. In both seasons, MCS precipitation amount, area, and rate are much larger in the frontal-related MCSs than in nonfrontal MCSs. A large-scale index constructed using pattern correlation between large-scale environments and the synoptically favorable SOM types is found to be skillful for estimating MCS number, precipitation rate, and area in spring, but its explanatory power decreases significantly in summer. The low predictability of summer MCSs deserves further investigation in the future.

Soil Moisture Influence on the Incidence of Summer Mesoscale Convective Systems in the U.S. Great Plains

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Gaal ◽  
James L. Kinter
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Great Plains ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Antecedent Soil Moisture ◽  
Initiation Point ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
The U.S

AbstractMesoscale convective systems (MCS) are known to develop under ideal conditions of temperature and humidity profiles and large-scale dynamic forcing. Recent work, however, has shown that summer MCS events can occur under weak synoptic forcing or even unfavorable large-scale environments. When baroclinic forcing is weak, convection may be triggered by anomalous conditions at the land surface. This work evaluates land surface conditions for summer MCS events forming in the U.S. Great Plains using an MCS database covering the contiguous United States east of the Rocky Mountains, in boreal summers 2004-2016. After isolating MCS cases where synoptic-scale influences are not the main driver of development (i.e. only non-squall line storms), antecedent soil moisture conditions are evaluated over two domain sizes (1.25° and 5° squares) centered on the mean position of the storm initiation. A negative correlation between soil moisture and MCS initiation is identified for the smaller domain, indicating that MCS events tend to be initiated over patches of anomalously dry soils of ~100-km scale, but not significantly so. For the larger domain, soil moisture heterogeneity, with anomalously dry soils (anomalously wet soils) located northeast (southwest) of the initiation point, is associated with MCS initiation. This finding is similar to previous results in the Sahel and Europe that suggest that induced meso-β circulations from surface heterogeneity can drive convection initiation.

scholarly journals Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Large-Scale Environments of Mesoscale Convective Systems East of the Rocky Mountains

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (21) ◽  
pp. 7303-7328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe Feng ◽  
Robert A. Houze ◽  
L. Ruby Leung ◽  
Fengfei Song ◽  
Joseph C. Hardin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Great Plains ◽  
Rocky Mountains ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Rain Area ◽  
Stratiform Rain ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Mcs Genesis

ABSTRACT The spatiotemporal variability and three-dimensional structures of mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) east of the U.S. Rocky Mountains and their large-scale environments are characterized across all seasons using 13 years of high-resolution radar and satellite observations. Long-lived and intense MCSs account for over 50% of warm season precipitation in the Great Plains and over 40% of cold season precipitation in the southeast. The Great Plains has the strongest MCS seasonal cycle peaking in May–June, whereas in the U.S. southeast MCSs occur year-round. Distinctly different large-scale environments across the seasons have significant impacts on the structure of MCSs. Spring and fall MCSs commonly initiate under strong baroclinic forcing and favorable thermodynamic environments. MCS genesis frequently occurs in the Great Plains near sunset, although convection is not always surface based. Spring MCSs feature both large and deep convection, with a large stratiform rain area and high volume of rainfall. In contrast, summer MCSs often initiate under weak baroclinic forcing, featuring a high pressure ridge with weak low-level convergence acting on the warm, humid air associated with the low-level jet. MCS genesis concentrates east of the Rocky Mountain Front Range and near the southeast coast in the afternoon. The strongest MCS diurnal cycle amplitude extends from the foothills of the Rocky Mountains to the Great Plains. Summer MCSs have the largest and deepest convective features, the smallest stratiform rain area, and the lowest rainfall volume. Last, winter MCSs are characterized by the strongest baroclinic forcing and the largest MCS precipitation features over the southeast. Implications of the findings for climate modeling are discussed.

scholarly journals Relative influence of meteorological conditions and aerosols on the lifetime of mesoscale convective systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (27) ◽  
pp. 7426-7431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudip Chakraborty ◽  
Rong Fu ◽  
Steven T. Massie ◽  
Graeme Stephens
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Convective Available Potential Energy ◽  
Vertical Wind Shear ◽  
Meteorological Conditions ◽  
Relative Influence ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Total Variance ◽  
Decay Phase ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Mesoscale Convective

Using collocated measurements from geostationary and polar-orbital satellites over tropical continents, we provide a large-scale statistical assessment of the relative influence of aerosols and meteorological conditions on the lifetime of mesoscale convective systems (MCSs). Our results show that MCSs’ lifetime increases by 3–24 h when vertical wind shear (VWS) and convective available potential energy (CAPE) are moderate to high and ambient aerosol optical depth (AOD) increases by 1 SD (1σ). However, this influence is not as strong as that of CAPE, relative humidity, and VWS, which increase MCSs’ lifetime by 3–30 h, 3–27 h, and 3–30 h per 1σ of these variables and explain up to 36%, 45%, and 34%, respectively, of the variance of the MCSs’ lifetime. AOD explains up to 24% of the total variance of MCSs’ lifetime during the decay phase. This result is physically consistent with that of the variation of the MCSs’ ice water content (IWC) with aerosols, which accounts for 35% and 27% of the total variance of the IWC in convective cores and anvil, respectively, during the decay phase. The effect of aerosols on MCSs’ lifetime varies between different continents. AOD appears to explain up to 20–22% of the total variance of MCSs’ lifetime over equatorial South America compared with 8% over equatorial Africa. Aerosols over the Indian Ocean can explain 20% of total variance of MCSs’ lifetime over South Asia because such MCSs form and develop over the ocean. These regional differences of aerosol impacts may be linked to different meteorological conditions.

Lake-effect rains over Lake Victoria and their association with Mesoscale Convective Systems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon E. Nicholson ◽  
Douglas Klotter ◽  
Adam T. Hartman
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Lake Victoria ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Lake Effect ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Strong Convection ◽  
Short Rains ◽  
Lake Catchment

AbstractThis article examined rainfall enhancement over Lake Victoria. Estimates of over-lake rainfall were compared with rainfall in the surrounding lake catchment. Four satellite products were initially tested against estimates based on gauges or water balance models. These included TRMM 3B43, IMERG V06 Final Run (IMERG-F), CHIRPS2, and PERSIANN-CDR. There was agreement among the satellite products for catchment rainfall but a large disparity among them for over-lake rainfall. IMERG-F was clearly an outlier, exceeding the estimate from TRMM 3B43 by 36%. The overestimation by IMERG-F was likely related to passive microwave assessments of strong convection, such as prevails over Lake Victoria. Overall, TRMM 3B43 showed the best agreement with the "ground truth" and was used in further analyses. Over-lake rainfall was found to be enhanced compared to catchment rainfall in all months. During the March-to-May long rains the enhancement varied between 40% and 50%. During the October-to-December short rains the enhancement varied between 33% and 44%. Even during the two dry seasons the enhancement was at least 20% and over 50% in some months. While the magnitude of enhancement varied from month to month, the seasonal cycle was essentially the same for over-lake and catchment rainfall, suggesting that the dominant influence on over-lake rainfall is the large-scale environment. The association with Mesoscale Convective Systems (MCSs) was also evaluated. The similarity of the spatial patterns of rainfall and MCS count each month suggested that these produced a major share of rainfall over the lake. Similarity in interannual variability further supported this conclusion.

scholarly journals Lightning and precipitation produced by severe weather systems over Belém, Brazil

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (spe) ◽  
pp. 41-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanda Maria do Nascimento Ribeiro ◽  
José Ricardo Santos Souza ◽  
Márcio Nirlando Gomes Lopes ◽  
Renata Kelen Cardoso Câmara ◽  
Edson José Paulino Rocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Electric Activity ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Cg Lightning

CG Lightning flashes events monitored by a LDN of the Amazon Protection System, which included 12 LPATS IV VAISALA sensors distributed over eastern Amazonia, were analyzed during four severe rainstorm occurrences in Belem-PA-Brazil, in the 2006-2007 period. These selected case studies referred to rainfall events, which produced more than 25 mm/hour, or more than 40 mm/ 2 hours of precipitation rate totals, registered by a tipping bucket automatic high-resolution rain gauge, located at 1º 47' 53" S and 48º 30' 16" W. Centered at this location, a 30 ,10 and 5 km radius circles were drawn by means of a geographic information system, and the data from lightning occurrences within this larger area, were set apart for analysis. During these severe storms the CG lightning events, occurred almost randomly over the surrounding defined circle, previously covered by mesoscale convective systems, for all cases studied. This work also showed that the interaction between large-scale and mesoscale weather conditions have a major influence on the intensity of the storms studied cases. In addition to the enhancement of the lightning and precipitation rates, the electric activity within the larger circles can precede the rainfall at central point of the areas

scholarly journals Evaluation of Mesoscale Convective Systems in Climate Simulations: Methodological Development and Results from MPAS-CAM over the U.S.

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-62
Author(s):  
Zhe Feng ◽  
Fengfei Song ◽  
Koichi Sakaguchi ◽  
L. Ruby Leung
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Tracking Algorithm ◽  
Convective System ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Climate Simulations ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Process Oriented ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Oriented Approach

AbstractA process-oriented approach is developed to evaluate warm-season mesoscale convective system (MCS) precipitation and their favorable large-scale meteorological patterns (FLSMPs) over the U.S. This approach features a novel observation-driven MCS-tracking algorithm using infrared brightness temperature and precipitation feature at 12, 25 and 50 km resolution and metrics to evaluate the model large-scale environment favorable for MCS initiation. The tracking algorithm successfully reproduces the observed MCS statistics from a reference 4-km radar MCS database. To demonstrate the utility of the new methodologies in evaluating MCS in climate simulations with mesoscale resolution, the process-oriented approach is applied to two climate simulations produced by the Variable-Resolution Model for Prediction Across Scales coupled to the Community Atmosphere Model physics, with refined horizontal grid spacing at 50 km and 25 km over North America. With the tracking algorithm applied to simulations and observations at equivalent resolutions, the simulated number of MCS and associated precipitation amount, frequency and intensity are found to be consistently underestimated in the Central U.S., particularly from May to August. The simulated MCS precipitation shows little diurnal variation and lasts too long, while MCS precipitation area is too large and intensity is too weak. The model is able to simulate four types of observed FLSMP associated with frontal systems and low-level jets (LLJ) in spring, but the frequencies are underestimated because of low-level dry bias and weaker LLJ. Precipitation simulated under different FLSMPs peak during daytime, in contrast to the observed nocturnal peak. Implications of these findings for future model development and diagnostics are discussed.

scholarly journals The Role of Continental Mesoscale Convective Systems in Forecast Busts within Global Weather Prediction Systems

Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parsons ◽  
Lillo ◽  
Rattray ◽  
Bechtold ◽  
Rodwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Great Plains ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Middle Latitudes ◽  
Medium Range ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Prediction Systems

Despite significant, steady improvements in the skill of medium-range weather predictionsystems over the past several decades, the accuracy of these forecasts are occasionally very poor.These forecast failures are referred to as “busts” or “dropouts”. The lack of a clear explanationfor bust events limits the development and implementation of strategies designed to reduce theiroccurrence. This study seeks to explore a flow regime where forecast busts occur over Europe inassociation with mesoscale convective systems over North America east of the Rocky Mountains.Our investigation focuses on error growth in the European Centre for Medium-Range WeatherForecasting’s (ECMWF’s) global model during the summer 2015 PECAN (Plains Elevated Convectionat Night) experiment. Observations suggest that a close, but varied interrelationship can occurbetween long-lived, propagating, mesoscale convection systems over the Great Plains and Rossbywave packets. Aloft, the initial error occurs in the ridge of the wave and then propagates downstreamas an amplifying Rossby wave packet producing poor forecasts in middle latitudes and, in somecases, the Arctic. Our results suggest the importance of improving the representation of organizeddeep convection in numerical models, particularly for long-lived mesoscale convective systems thatproduce severe weather and propagate near the jet stream.

scholarly journals Synoptic Control of Convective Rainfall Rates and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Frequencies in Warm-Season Mesoscale Convective Systems over North China

2018 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 813-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudi Xia ◽  
Da-Lin Zhang ◽  
Cuihong Zhang ◽  
Yongqing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Conditions ◽  
North China ◽  
Convective Available Potential Energy ◽  
Cloud Microphysics ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Convective Rainfall ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Mesoscale Convective ◽  
Cg Lightning

Abstract This study examines whether environmental conditions can control convective rainfall rates and cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning frequencies in mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) over north China (NC). A total of 60 identified MCSs over NC during June–August of 2008–13 were classified into 4 categories based on their high/low convective rainfall rates (HR/LR) and high/low CG lightning frequencies (HL/LL) (i.e., HRHL, HRLL, LRHL, and LRLL MCSs). MCSs with HR (HL) occurred most frequently in July (August), while those with LR or LL occurred most frequently in June; they followed closely seasonal changes. All MCSs were apt to form during afternoon hours. HRLL MCSs also formed during evening hours while HRHL MCSs could occur at any time of a day. A composite analysis of environmental conditions shows obvious differences and similarities among the HRHL, HRLL, and LRLL categories, while the LRHL MCSs exhibited little differences from the climatological mean because of its small sample size. Both the HRHL and HRLL MCSs occurred in the presence of upper-level anomalous divergence, a midlevel trough, and the lower-tropospheric southwesterly transport of tropical moist air. In contrast, LRLL MCSs took place as a result of daytime heating over mountainous regions, with little midlevel forcing over NC. The HRHL, HRLL, LRHL, and LRLL categories exhibited orders of the highest-to-smallest convective available potential energy and precipitable water but the smallest-to-largest convective inhibition and lifted indices. It is concluded that environmental conditions determine to some extent convective rainfall rates and CG lightning activity, although some other processes (e.g., cloud microphysics) also play certain roles, especially in CG lightning production.

Physical Processes Associated with Heavy Flooding Rainfall in Nashville, Tennessee, and Vicinity during 1–2 May 2010: The Role of an Atmospheric River and Mesoscale Convective Systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 358-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Moore ◽  
Paul J. Neiman ◽  
F. Martin Ralph ◽  
Faye E. Barthold
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Heavy Rainfall ◽  
Convective Available Potential Energy ◽  
Mesoscale Convective Systems ◽  
Water Vapor Transport ◽  
Mississippi Valley ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Atmospheric River ◽  
Mesoscale Convective

A multiscale analysis is conducted in order to examine the physical processes that resulted in prolonged heavy rainfall and devastating flash flooding across western and central Tennessee and Kentucky on 1–2 May 2010, during which Nashville, Tennessee, received 344.7 mm of rainfall and incurred 11 flood-related fatalities. On the synoptic scale, heavy rainfall was supported by a persistent corridor of strong water vapor transport rooted in the tropics that was manifested as an atmospheric river (AR). This AR developed as water vapor was extracted from the eastern tropical Pacific and the Caribbean Sea and transported into the central Mississippi Valley by a strong southerly low-level jet (LLJ) positioned between a stationary lee trough along the eastern Mexico coast and a broad, stationary subtropical ridge positioned over the southeastern United States and the subtropical Atlantic. The AR, associated with substantial water vapor content and moderate convective available potential energy, supported the successive development of two quasi-stationary mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) on 1 and 2 May, respectively. These MCSs were both linearly organized and exhibited back-building and echo-training, processes that afforded the repeated movement of convective cells over the same area of western and central Tennessee and Kentucky, resulting in a narrow band of rainfall totals of 200–400 mm. Mesoscale analyses reveal that the MCSs developed on the warm side of a slow-moving cold front and that the interaction between the southerly LLJ and convectively generated outflow boundaries was fundamental for generating convection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document