The ECVAM Workshops: A Critical Assessment of their Impact on the Development, Validation and Acceptance of Alternative Methods

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 151-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Combes

ECVAM initiated its workshop programme in 1994, to enable it to become well informed about the state of the art of non-animal test development and validation, and about the possible incorporation of alternatives into regulatory requirements for safety testing. Fifty-one such workshops had been held on specific topics, up to 2002. In these workshops, the current status of in vitro tests and their potential uses were reviewed and recommendations were made as to the best ways forward to progress and enhance the use of in vitro methods. Reports for 46 of these workshops have been published in ATLA. Most of the workshops focused on in vitro replacement methods, although an increasing number have dealt with reduction and refinement. The recommendations in the ECVAM workshops have been progressed further by: a) the formation of ECVAM task forces; b) the organisation of further workshops; c) the activities of scientific committees; d) the provision of earmarked research funding; and e) the conduct of validation studies. Examples of each of these activities are discussed. Some individual workshops are covered in more detail, and several recommendations that have so far not been acted on are also considered. The workshops and their reports have had a substantial effect on the development and implementation of alternative methods, and have been a major factor in contributing to the success of the first nine years of ECVAM's existence. It is strongly recommended that ECVAM continues to organise workshops and to publish their findings, and suggestions are made for topics for future workshops.

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A. Botham ◽  
Lesley K. Earl ◽  
Julia H. Fentem ◽  
Roland Roguet ◽  
Johannes J.M. van de Sandt

The ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force was established in November 1996, primarily to prepare a report on the current status of the development and validation of alternative tests for skin irritation and corrosion and, in particular, to identify any appropriate non-animal tests for predicting human skin irritation which were sufficiently well-developed to warrant ECVAM supporting their prevalidation/validation. The task force based its discussions around the proposed testing strategy for skin irritation/corrosion emanating from an OECD workshop held in January 1996. The following have been reviewed: a) structure-activity and structure-property relationships for skin corrosion and irritation; b) the use of pH and acid/alkaline reserve measurements in predicting skin corrosivity; c) in vitro tests for skin corrosion; d) in vitro tests for skin irritation (keratinocyte cultures, organ cultures, and reconstituted human skin models); and e) human patch tests for skin irritation. It was apparent that, although several promising candidate in vitro tests for skin irritation (for example, reconstituted human skin methods, and human and animal skin organ culture methods) were under development and evaluation, a test protocol, a preliminary prediction model and supporting data on different types of chemicals were only available for a method employing EpiDerm™. Thus, it is proposed that this EpiDerm test undergoes prevalidation during 1998. In addition, since it was felt preferable to be able to include other in vitro tests in such a prevalidation study, it is recommended that a “challenge” be set to anyone interested in taking part. This involves submitting data on ten test chemicals selected by the task force, obtained according to a standard protocol with a preliminary prediction model, for review by the task force by 31 May 1998.


1990 ◽  
Vol 18 (1_part_1) ◽  
pp. 117-128
Author(s):  
David K. Wilcox ◽  
Leon H. Bruner

An increasing number of in vitro tests are being proposed as alternatives for animals in ocular safety testing. These in vitro systems use a variety of approaches and measure a broad range of endpoints, including cellular cytotoxicity and metabolism. We will briefly review the development and validation of these model systems. Several tests appear promising, and may prove useful as adjuncts in our current ocular safety assessment schemes. We will also discuss how these tests can most rapidly be brought to use in ocular safety assessment, and where efforts should be directed to develop more-highly predictive in vitro model systems for the future.


1990 ◽  
Vol 18 (1_part_1) ◽  
pp. 103-116
Author(s):  
Sven Hellberg ◽  
Lennart Eriksson ◽  
Jörgen Jonsson ◽  
Fredrik Lindgren ◽  
Michael Sjöström ◽  
...  

Estimating the toxicity to humans of chemicals by testing on human subjects is not considered to be ethically acceptable, and toxicity testing on laboratory animals is also questionable. Therefore, there is a need for alternative methods that will give estimates of various aspects of human toxicity. Batteries of in vitro tests, together with physicochemical and toxicokinetic data, analysed by efficient data analytical methods, may enable analogy models to be constructed that can predict human toxicity. It may be possible to model non-specific toxicity relating to lipophilicity, or basal cytotoxicity, for a series of diverse compounds with large variation in chemical structure and physicochemical properties. However, local models for a series of similar compounds are generally expected to be more accurate, as well as being capable of modelling more-specific interactions. Analogy models for the prediction of human toxicity are discussed and exemplified with physicochemical and cytotoxicity data from the first ten chemicals in the multicenter evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity (MEIC) project.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1958 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1000-1009
Author(s):  
Charles V. Pryles

The use of combinations of drugs in "shotgun" fashion, on the theory if one will do something, two or three will accomplish more, is to be deplored. A single antibiotic can be used effectively in most infections caused by a single organism. Furthermore, a single wide-spectrum antibiotic may be used in many mixed infections. In certain infections, the value of combinations of antibiotics has been proved, both in the laboratory and in the clinic: (a) streptomycin plus one of the tetracyclines in brucellosis; (b) penicillin plus streptomycin in enterococcic endocarditis; (c) erythromycin plus chloramphenicol in serious staphylococcal infections in which the organism is resistant to penicillin; (d) streptomycin, isoniazid and para-aminosalicyclic acid in treatment of tuberculosis. In these infections, the proper combination should be used from the start and in full therapeutic dosage. Mixtures of antibiotics may occasionally be useful in individual cases outside this group but, in general, these mixtures do not produce a synergistic effect. If the infection does not fall into one of the four classes already cited, the in-vitro effect of combinations of various antibiotics should be studied, providing the patient's illness is such that a delay of 48 to 72 hours is warranted. The combination showing the greatest synergistic effect should then be used. Persisting urinary tract infections and endocarditis are examples of conditions in which this method is likely to produce results. Even here, it must be borne in mind that such in-vitro tests do not guarantee that a certain mixture of antibiotics will be effective clinically; in fact, they may be misleading. In accord with the recommendations of Dowling, if there is not sufficient time for an in-vitro study to be carried out, two antibiotics in Jawetz and Gunnison's Group 1 (see text) may be used together, if each alone is partially effective against the causative organism. If no two antibiotics in Group 1 fit this criterion, and a combination of an antibiotic from Group 1 and one from Group 2 does fit the criterion, this combination should be given in doses that will result in full therapeutic concentrations of each antibiotic at the site of infection. For delaying the emergence of resistant strains of tubercle bacilli, combinations of two or more of the following drugs are indicated: Streptomycin, isoniazid and para-aminosalicylic acid. A combination of chloramphenicol with erythromycin is also indicated to delay emergence of resistance of staphylococci to the batter antibiotics. In the treatment of seriously ill patients before a bacteriologic diagnosis is available, two or more antibiotics may properly be administered. Such illnesses include endocarditis, suspected staphylococcal pneumonia in infants, tuberculosis, brucellosis, and meningitis due to an unidentified organism. Combined antimicrobials should be given only after a careful clinical diagnosis has been made, and in doses that would be optimal for each drug if used alone. Readymade mixtures are not recommended for use systemically; certain combinations of agents, such as a mixture of bacitracin and polymyxin B, may have a place in topical therapy. Finally, there are several potentially harmful or undesirable effects that may result from the use of combinations of antimicrobials and these must be considered whenever their possible use arises. These include: (1) the tendency of fixed, "packaged" combinations to encourage inadequate therapy; (2) the possible increase in hypersensitivity and/or toxicity to one or more of the agents in a combination; (3) the probable emergence of bacterial resistance to either or both of the antibiotics in a mixture; (4) superinfection by originally resistant organisms not affected by the therapy; (5) the accumulation of antibiotic-resistant organisms within hospitals or other semiclosed communities; and (6) the possibility of interference of one antibiotic with the operation of another in a given combination.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heejun Park ◽  
Eun-Sol Ha ◽  
Min-Soo Kim

Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDSs) are a vital strategy to enhance the bioavailability (BA) of formulations of poorly water-soluble compounds. However, these formulations have certain limitations, including in vivo drug precipitation, poor in vitro in vivo correlation due to a lack of predictive in vitro tests, issues in handling of liquid formulation, and physico-chemical instability of drug and/or vehicle components. To overcome these limitations, which restrict the potential usage of such systems, the supersaturable SEDDSs (su-SEDDSs) have gained attention based on the fact that the inclusion of precipitation inhibitors (PIs) within SEDDSs helps maintain drug supersaturation after dispersion and digestion in the gastrointestinal tract. This improves the BA of drugs and reduces the variability of exposure. In addition, the formulation of solid su-SEDDSs has helped to overcome disadvantages of liquid or capsule dosage form. This review article discusses, in detail, the current status of su-SEDDSs that overcome the limitations of conventional SEDDSs. It discusses the definition and range of su-SEDDSs, the principle mechanisms underlying precipitation inhibition and enhanced in vivo absorption, drug application cases, biorelevance in vitro digestion models, and the development of liquid su-SEDDSs to solid dosage forms. This review also describes the effects of various physiological factors and the potential interactions between PIs and lipid, lipase or lipid digested products on the in vivo performance of su-SEDDSs. In particular, several considerations relating to the properties of PIs are discussed from various perspectives.


2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Zinke ◽  
Ingrid Gerner ◽  
Gabriele Graetschel ◽  
Eva Schlede

The notification procedure for new chemicals of the European Union (EU) requires protocols on physicochemical and toxicological tests for the evaluation of physico-chemical properties and probable toxic effects of each notified substance. In order to reduce the amount of animal testing, alternative methods should be introduced into toxicity testing. Therefore, we have developed a rule-based decision support system (DSS) for the prediction of the local corrosive/irritant properties of new chemicals. To this end, data on more than 1000 substances were examined, which resulted in approximtely 180 “exception-rules” of the kind IF (physicochemical property) A THEN not (toxic) Effect B. In addition, the structural formulae of the chemicals were analysed, which resulted in approximately 160 “structure-rules” of the kind IF Substructure A THEN Effect B. The DSS can predict (based on theoretical structure-activity relationships) whether a chemical produces: a) corrosive effects (i.e. no testing is necessary; b) might have corrosive effects (i.e. no animal testing, in vitro tests are suitable); and c) will produce no effects or only marginal effects (i.e. animal tests are necessary based on current EU legislation for hazard assessment purposes). In addition, the DSS provides reliable data for legal classification and labelling based on a specific result.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Gerner ◽  
Manfred Liebsch ◽  
Horst Spielmann

Huggins has reported on the current situation relating to the development of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test with rabbits, and an ECVAM Working Group have reviewed the efforts needed in order to replace this animal test within the next 10 years by using the results of non-animal assessment methods. Our report reviews regulatory experience gained over the last 20 years with the EU chemicals notification procedure with respect to the assessment of eye lesions observed in Draize tests. The nature of eye lesions and their importance for classification and labelling of possible hazards to human eyes are evaluated and discussed, with a view to promoting the development of specific in vitro assays which are able to discriminate between eye damage, moderate eye irritation, and minor irritation effects which are completely reversible within a few days. Structural alerts for the prediction of eye irritation/corrosion hazards to be classified and labelled according to international classification criteria, are presented, which should be validated in accordance with internationally agreed (OECD) principles for (Q)SAR system validation. Physicochemical limit values for prediction of the absence of any eye irritation potential relevant for human health can make available a definition of the applicability domains of alternative methods developed for the replacement of the Draize eye irritation test.


2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-74
Author(s):  
Christina Grindon ◽  
Robert Combes ◽  
Mark T.D. Cronin ◽  
David W. Roberts ◽  
John F. Garrod

Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME recently conducted a research project, sponsored by Defra, on the status of alternatives to animal testing with regard to the European Union REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals) system for the safety testing and risk assessment of chemicals. The project covered all the main toxicity endpoints associated with the REACH system. This report focuses on how to maximise the use of alternative methods (both in vitro and in silico) for skin corrosion and irritation testing within a tiered testing strategy. It considers the latest developments in in vitro testing, with particular reference to the reconstituted skin models which have now been now been successfully validated and independently endorsed as suitable for both skin corrosivity and irritancy testing within the EU.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Cotovio ◽  
Marie-Hélène Grandidier ◽  
Pascal Portes ◽  
Roland Roguet ◽  
Gilles Rubinstenn

In view of the increasing need to identify non-animal tests able to predict acute skin irritation of chemicals, the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) focused on the evaluation of appropriate in vitro models. In vitro tests should be capable of discriminating between irritant (I) chemicals (EU risk: R38) and non-irritant (NI) chemicals (EU risk: “no classification”). Since major in vivo skin irritation assays rely on visual scoring, it is still a challenge to correlate in vivo clinical signs with in vitro biochemical measurements. Being particularly suited to test raw materials or chemicals with a wide variety of physical properties, in vitro skin models resembling in vivo human skin were involved in prevalidation processes. Among many other factors, cytotoxicity is known to trigger irritation processes, and can therefore be a first common event for irritants. A refined protocol (protocol15min–18hours) for the EPISKIN model had been proposed for inclusion in the ECVAM formal validation study. A further improvement on this protocol, mainly based on a post-treatment incubation period of 42 hours (protocol15min–42hours), the optimised protocol, was applied to a set of 48 chemicals. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy with the MTT assay-based prediction model (PM) were 85%, 78.6% and 81.3% respectively, with a low rate of false negatives (12%). The improved performance of this optimised protocol was confirmed by a higher robustness (homogeneity of individual responses) and a better discrimination between the I and NI classes. To improve the MTT viability-based PM, the release of a membrane damage marker, adenylate kinase (AK), and of cytokines IL-1α and IL-8 were also investigated. Combining these endpoints, a simple two-tiered strategy (TTS) was developed, with the MTT assay as the first, sort-out, stage. This resulted in a clear increase in sensitivity to 95%, and a fall in the false-positive rate (to 4.3%), thus demonstrating its usefulness as a “decision-making” tool. The optimised protocol proved, both by its higher performances and by its robustness, to be a good candidate for the validation process, as well as a potential alternative method for assessing acute skin irritation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document