scholarly journals Referral of Surgical Patients to an Anaesthetic Clinic: A Decision-making Analysis

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 562-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lee ◽  
M. E. Lum ◽  
K. M. Hillman ◽  
A. Bauman
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Medical Problems ◽  
Effective Utilization ◽  
Professional Groups ◽  
History Of

Effective utilization of an anaesthetic clinic depends on appropriate referral of high-risk surgical patients. The decision-making behaviour of anaesthetists and nurses was examined to identify factors that influence the referral of patients to an outpatient anaesthetic clinic. Eleven consultant anaesthetists, seven anaesthetic trainees and sixteen nurses working in anaesthetic areas estimated the likelihood that they would refer patients for each of the 30 scenarios presented. The relative importance of each factor influencing the decision to refer as determined by the 34 participants were: type of procedure (22%), co-morbidities (18%), fitness (13%), history of anaesthetic problems (12%), medications (11%), age (10%), obesity (8%) and anxiety (6%). Indicative risk factors identified were aged 65 years or over, unable to climb more than two flights of stairs, presence of significant medical problems, gross obesity, history of anaesthetic problems, taking regular medications, scheduled for major surgery and expressed anxiety about the anaesthetic. There were large variations in the decision-making behaviour among health professional groups.

Prognostic Factors for Developing Thrombosis in Polycytemia Vera: A Retrospective Analysis of 331 Patients with Long-Term Follow-up Highlights the Importance of White Blood Cells Levels

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 48-49
Author(s):  
Samantha Ferrari ◽  
Chiara Pagani ◽  
Mariella D'Adda ◽  
Nicola Bianchetti ◽  
Annamaria Pelizzari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
Wbc Count

Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis, constitutively active mutations in JAK2 and an increased susceptibility to thrombotic events (TEs). There is still controversy about the role of increased hematocrit and of other variables including elevated white blood cell count as risk factors for the occurrence of TEs. A better definition of the relative prognostic importance of hematologic parameters would help us to better tailor the therapeutic approach to PV patients (pts), which is currently mainly based on the use of acetilsalycilic acid (ASA), venesection and hydroxyurea . The aim of our study was to analyze if any clinical or laboratory variables were significantly associated to the occurrence of TEs both at PV diagnosis and during the course of the disease in a large series of PV pts uniformly followed at a single Center over a period of 29.5 years from January 1986 to June 2019. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from the time of diagnosis until death, progression to acute leukemia or last follow-up. Hematocrit (Hct), hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT) levels were recorded for each patient at least every 6 months. Among a total of 331 pts, the median age was 65 years (range 30-92 years), and 56% were male. "High risk" features (age ≥ 60 years and/or history of prior thrombosis) were present in 221 pts (66.7%). The incidence of cardiovascular risk factors was: hypertension 64%, diabetes 15%, hyperlipidemia 28%, history of active or remote smoking 41%. Patients on ASA were 279 (84%), 19 (6%) were on oral anticoagulation, while 27 (8%) were on ASA+oral anticoagulant. At PV diagnosis 54 pts (16%) presented with thrombosis, arterial in 32 (59%) and venous in 22 (41%). A previous TE was recorded in 57 pts (17%): in 43 (75%) arterial, in 12 (22%) venous and in 2 (3%) mixed (arterial+venous). Previous thrombosis was the only variable significantly associated with the presence of a TE at PV diagnosis (P=0.02). After PV diagnosis, with a median follow-up of 81 months (range 1-374 months), 63 pts (19%) experienced a TE and 11 of them a further episode, for a total of 74 TEs. The incidence rate (pts/year) of TEs was 2.7%. Forty-two events were arterial (57%), 31 were venous (42%) and 1 (1%) was mixed. It was the first TE for 37 pts. Cerebrovascular accidents and deep-venous thrombosis were the most frequent arterial and venous TEs both at PV diagnosis and throughout the disease course, with a relative incidence of 50% and 32% respectively. The table compares the characteristics of patients who did or did not develop a TE after PV diagnosis. At univariate analysis, PV high risk status, a previous TE and hyperlipidemia at PV diagnosis were significantly associated with a subsequent TE. Among hematologic variables an elevated WBC count at the time of thrombosis, but not Hct or PLT levels, was highly significantly associated with the development of a TE. At multivariate analysis, WBC count ≥10.4 x 10^9/L and hyperlipidemia maintained their independent prognostic value, while high risk status and a previous TE lost their prognostic significance. Both at univariate and multivariate analysis, hyperlipidemia at diagnosis (P=0.009 and P=0.002) and high WBC count at thrombosis (P=0.001 and P=<0.0001) predicted for arterial thromboses, while only a history of prior thrombosis (P=0.03) predicted for venous ones. In conclusion, our analysis confirms that elevated WBC count at the moment of the event more than increased hematocrit is associated to the development of thrombosis in PV pts. We also found that hyperlipidemia was an independent risk factor for arterial thrombosis, calling for an accurate management of increased lipid levels. Whether a reduction of the WBC count during the course of PV may reduce the frequency of TE remains to be demonstrated by prospective studies. Table Disclosures D'Adda: Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Incyte: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board. Rossi:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals ПОРІВНЯЛЬНА ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКА ФАКТОРІВ РИЗИКУ

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
І. К. Чурпій
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Electrolyte Composition ◽  
Terminal Phase ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
History Of

<p>To optimize the therapeutic tactics and improve the treatment of peritonitis on the basis of retrospective analysis there are determined the significant risk factors: female gender, age 60 – 90 years, time to hospitalization for more than 48 hours, a history of myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrhythmia, biliary, fecal and fibrinous purulent exudate, the terminal phase flow, operations with resection of the intestine and postoperative complications such as pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, pleurisy, early intestinal obstruction. Changes in the electrolyte composition of blood and lower albumin &lt;35 % of high risk prognostic course of peritonitis that requires immediate correction in the pre-and postoperative periods. The combination of three or more risk factors for various systems, creating a negative outlook for further treatment and the patient's life.</p>

scholarly journals Prediction of the risk of developing diabetes mellitus among Bangladeshi adults by using risk assessment score

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Nazma Akter
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Diabetes Risk ◽  
High Blood Glucose ◽  
History Of ◽  
Diabetes Risk Score

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered as one of the major health problems worldwide. The rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Bangladesh is primarily attributed to rapid urbanization and associated changes in lifestyle, such as sedentary lifestyle, higher calorie food intake and stressful life. Studies support the utilization of riskassessment scoring systems in quantifying individual’s risk for developing T2DM. Thus, a simple risk-assessment scoring system for early screening of T2DM among Bangladeshi adults will be beneficial to identify the high-risk adults and thus taking adequate preventive measures in combating DM.The purpose of the study was to calculate the risk assessment score of developing T2DM within 10 years among Bangladeshi adults. Methods: The cross-sectional observational study was carried out in the outpatient department (OPD) of Medicine, MARKS Medical College & Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh from February 2018 to July 2018 among randomly sampled 205 adult subjects. Subjects undiagnosed with diabetes mellitus and had previous history of high blood glucose during pregnancy or other health examination (i.e. impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance or gestational diabetes mellitus) were included. From a review of literature regarding risk factors of developing DM in Bangladesh, the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) system was found to be more useful for the Bangladeshi adults. The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) questionnaire was used to collect the data including demographic characteristics and different risk factors and to calculate total risk score for predicting the risk of developing T2DM within 10 years. Results: Among 205 subjects, male and female were 57.1% and 42.9% respectively. The Mean (±SD) age of the study subjects was 37.64±1.07 years. In this study, both non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors showed statistically significant association with the FINDRISC among Bangladeshi adults (p<0.05). There was a significant association among FINDRISC with history of previous high blood glucose, and treated hypertensive Bangladeshi adults.33.65% of the Bangladeshi adults had slightly elevated diabetes risk score (DRS). This study predicts that 17.55% of the Bangladeshi adults may have moderate to high risk to develop T2DM within the consecutive 10 years. Conclusion: This study provides a simple, feasible, non-invasive and convenient screening FINDRISC tool that identifies individuals at risk of having T2DM. People with high risk of DM should be referred for early intervention and changes to a healthy lifestyle and primary prevention to prevent or delay the onset of T2DM. Birdem Med J 2020; 10(1): 40-47

scholarly journals Re-operation within 30 days of radical cystectomy: Identifying high-risk patients and complications using ACS-NSQIP database

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashid K. Sayyid ◽  
Diana Magee ◽  
Amanda E. Hird ◽  
Benjamin T. Harper ◽  
Eric Webb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
African American ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Metastatic Bladder Cancer ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
African American Race

Introduction: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a highly morbid procedure, with 30-day complication rates approaching 31%. Our objective was to determine risk factors for re-operation within 30 days following a RC for non-metastatic bladder cancer. Methods: We included all patients who underwent a RC for non-metastatic bladder cancer using The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate predictors of re-operation. Results: A total of 2608 patients were included; 5.8% of patients underwent re-operation within 30 days. On multivariable analysis, increasing body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.07), African-American race (vs. Caucasian OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.21–4.34), and history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.45–3.74) were significant predictors of re-operation within 30 days of RC. Urinary diversion type (ileal conduit vs. continent) and history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 30 days prior to RC were not. Patients who underwent re-operation within this timeframe had a significantly higher mortality rate (4.0% vs. 1.6%) and were more likely to experience cardiac (7.2% vs. 1.9%), pulmonary (23.0% vs. 3.0%), neurological (2.0% vs. 0.49%), and venous thromboembolic events (10.5% vs. 5.4%), as well as infectious complications (64.5% vs. 24.1%) with a significantly longer hospital length of stay (16.5 vs. 7.0 days). Conclusions: Recognizing increasing BMI, COPD, and African-American race as risk factors for re-operation within 30 days of RC will allow urologists to preoperatively identify such high-risk patients and prompt them to adopt more aggressive approaches to minimize postoperative surgical complications.

scholarly journals Risk factors for a first thrombotic event in antiphospholipid antibody carriers: a prospective multicentre follow-up study

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1083-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Ruffatti ◽  
Teresa Del Ross ◽  
Manuela Ciprian ◽  
Maria T Bertero ◽  
Sciascia Salvatore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody ◽  
History Of ◽  
Ischaemic Attack ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

ObjectivesTo assess risk factors for a first thrombotic event in confirmed antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody carriers and to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic treatments.MethodsInclusion criteria were age 18–65 years, no history of thrombosis and two consecutive positive aPL results. Demographic, laboratory and clinical parameters were collected at enrolment, once a year during the follow-up and at the time of the thrombotic event, whenever that occurred.Results258 subjects were prospectively observed between October 2004 and October 2008. The mean±SD follow-up was 35.0±11.9 months (range 1–48). A first thrombotic event (9 venous, 4 arterial and 1 transient ischaemic attack) occurred in 14 subjects (5.4%, annual incidence rate 1.86%). Hypertension and lupus anticoagulant (LA) were significantly predictive of thrombosis (both at p<0.05) and thromboprophylaxis was significantly protective during high-risk periods (p<0.05) according to univariate analysis. Hypertension and LA were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis as independent risk factors for thrombosis (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.1, p<0.05, and HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 14, p<0.05, respectively).ConclusionsHypertension and LA are independent risk factors for thrombosis in aPL carriers. Thromboprophylaxis in these subjects should probably be limited to high-risk situations.

A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF RISK FACTORS OF BREAST CANCER AND THE USEFULNESS OF BREAST MRI AS AN ADDITION TO MAMMOGRAPHY IN DETECTING BREAST CANCER IN HIGH RISK WOMEN

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (11-3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noor Khairiah A. Karim ◽  
Rohayu Hami ◽  
Nur Hashamimi Hashim ◽  
Nizuwan Azman ◽  
Ibrahim Lutfi Shuaib
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Breast Mri ◽  
Breast Cancer Detection ◽  
P Value ◽  
High Risk Women ◽  
History Of

The risk factors of breast cancer among women, such as genetic, family history and lifestyle factors, can be divided into high-, intermediate- and average-risk. Determining these risk factors may actually help in preventing breast cancer occurrence. Besides that, screening of breast cancer which include mammography, can be done in promoting early breast cancer detection. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been recommended as a supplemental screening tool in high risk women. The aim of this study was to identify the significant risk factor of breast cancer among women and also to determine the usefulness of breast MRI as an addition to mammography in detection of breast cancer in high risk women. This retrospective cohort study design was conducted using patients’ data taken from those who underwent mammography for screening or diagnostic purposes in Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, from 2007 until 2015. Data from 289 subjects were successfully retrieved and analysed based on their risk factors of breast cancer. Meanwhile, data from 120 subjects who had high risks and underwent both mammography and breast MRI were further analysed. There were two significant risk factors of breast cancer seen among the study population: family history of breast cancer (p-value=0.012) and previous history of breast or ovarian cancer (p-value <0.001). Breast MRI demonstrated high sensitivity (90%) while mammography demonstrated high specificity (80%) in detection of breast cancer in all 120 subjects. The number of cases of breast cancer detection using breast MRI [46 (38.3%)] was higher compared to mammography [24 (20.0%)]. However, breast MRI was found to be non-significant as an adjunct tool to mammography in detecting breast cancer in high risk women (p-value=0.189). A comprehensive screening guideline and surveillance of women at high risk is indeed useful and should be implemented to increase cancer detection rate at early stage

Identification Of Patients (pts) With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) At High Risk Of Artery Occlusive Events (AOE) During Treatment With The 2nd Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Nilotinib, Using Risk Stratification For Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2726-2726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Rea ◽  
Tristan Mirault ◽  
Emmanuel Raffoux ◽  
Jean-Michel Miclea ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Risk Estimation ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
Very High

Background Nilotinib is approved for use in pts with CML after failure of imatinib and in newly diagnosed CP-CML. However, several studies report a nilotinib-associated risk of AOE, especially in pts with preexisting risk factors for CVD. Since CVD are a major cause of disability and death worldwide and result from complex interactions between multiple risk factors, we aimed at determining whether CVD risk estimation using the 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) classification could be useful to identify patients at high risk of AOE during nilotinib therapy. Methods Pts (n=75) treated with nilotinib upfront or after failure of prior TKI at our institution were included provided that baseline risk factors for CVD and prior history of established CVD could be retrospectively collected. Risk factors included age, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus (DM), arterial hypertension (AH), dyslipidemia and increased body mass index (BMI). Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to ESC 2012 classification: low/moderate (L/M) and high/very high (H/VH) CVD risk. H/VH included pts with any of the following: established CVD, DM, severe AH, familial dysplipidemia or a SCORE (systematic coronary risk evaluation project) ≥5%. Results At nilotinib initiation, median age was 51 years (19-76), 41 pts (54.7%) were males. Nilotinib was given upfront in 28 pts (37%) and after failure of imatinib or dasatinib following imatinib in 47 pts (63%). Median time from diagnosis was 1 month (0.3-4) in the former group and 25 months (2-130) in the latter. Median duration of TKI exposure prior to nilotinib in the latter group was 22 months (0.4-91). Initial nilotinib dosing regimen was 400mg BID in 42 pts (56%) and 300mg BID in 33 pts (44%). Median duration of nilotinib treatment of 28 months (3-76) and median follow-up was 30 months (3-77). At baseline, medical history revealed H/VH risk category in 15 pts (20%) including established CVD in 6 pts (8%) (all diagnosed before CML), DM in 10 pts (13.3%), severe AH in 1 pt (1.3%), familial dyslipidemia in 1 pt (1.3%) and a SCORE ≥5% in 2 pts (2.6%). Median number of CVD risk factors was 1 (0-6) including age ≥ 45 years in men and ≥ 55 years in women in 37 pts (49.3%), active smoking or ceased during the previous year in 12 pts (16.7%), DM in 10 pts (13.3%), AH in 14 pts (18.7%), dyslipidemia in 10 pts (13.3%) and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2in 20 pts (38.6). Nilotinib was discontinued in 23 pts (30.7%) due to adverse events (10 pts), resistance (7 pts), TKI discontinuation study (4 pts) or death (2 pts). AOE occurred in 12 pts after a median duration of nilotinib treatment of 24 months (9-47). AOE included myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=3), cerebrovascular events (CeVD) (n=3) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) (n=6). Overall, the cumulative incidence of AOE was 2.91% (95% CI: 0.74-11.42) by 12 months, 9.81% (95% CI: 4.57-21.08) by 24 months, 19.29 (95% CI: 10.77-34.56) by 36 months and 27.7% (95% CI: 16.2-47.35) by 48 months (discontinuation of nilotinib and death as competing risks). Cumulative incidence of AOE by 48 months was 72.22% (95% CI: 47.46-100) in the H/VH group and only 12.13% (95% CI: 4.32-34.08) in the L/M group. Log Rank comparison of Kaplan Meier analysis of 48-month survival without AOE showed a significant difference between the 2 groups (27.78% (95% CI: 0-58.9) versus 84.38% (95% CI: 67.04-100) p=0.0001). Sensitivity of the ESC classification in nilotinib-treated patients was 67% and specificity 89%. It is important to note that all pts with a history of AOE had recurrent AOE on nilotinib. Nilotinib was discontinued in 11 pts with AOE after a median time of 288 days (1-688), 7 pts had recurrent or worsening AOE before nilotinib discontinuation and 2 pts died from AOE. Conclusions In our retrospective study, CVD risk estimation according to the 2012 ESC classification reveals that pts who belong to the H/VH risk group at baseline are at very high risk of AOE during nilotinib therapy. These findings now need to be validated in a prospective fashion. Nevertheless, we readily recommend that assessment of CVD risk should be performed in all pts considered for nilotinib therapy. Alternative TKI may be chosen whenever possible in pts at H/VH risk of CVD. In those treated with nilotinib, CVD risk should be reassessed throughout therapy and risk factors should be tightly controlled according to current guidelines. Disclosures: Rea: BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria. Messas:Novartis: Honoraria.

Chemotherapy-associated thrombosis in cancer outpatients: Risk factors and decision making of a prophylactic approach.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20647-e20647
Author(s):  
Martina Torchio ◽  
Benvenuto Franceschetti ◽  
Carla Cavali ◽  
Sonia Zanirato ◽  
Angelo Olgiati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Factors Analysis ◽  
Negative Predictor

e20647 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), is a negative predictor of survival in pts with advanced cancer. International guidelines don’t recommend routine prophlaxis but suggest to consider pts, undergoing chemotherapy (CT), with high risk of VTE. Many clinical risk factors for cancer-associated VTE have been evaluated in a 5 parameter-based (body mass index, platelet and leucocyte counts, hemoglobin value and tumor site) scoring system, the Khorana score, utilized to indicate a prophylactic approach. We prospectively applied this score in cancer outpts beginning CT and an implementation based on 6 addictional factors analysis (sex, age, central venous catheter, CT-agents, antiangiogenetic drugs, erithropoiesis stimulating agent) to evaluate their impact in pts assignment into risk groups. Methods: We studied adult pts, followed at our Department from August 2011 to December 2012, with advanced cancers (breast, NSCLC, colorectal, pancreatic/gastric, urogenital, LNH, Hodgkin's disease, HD, and MM), receiving a first or second line standard CT. We stratified pts into three risk groups (score 0= low; score 1-2=intermediate; score 3-4-5=high) considering both the Khorana scoring system and its implementation. Results: We analyzed 169 pts (103F/66M, median age 62.3, range 35-80 yrs), pt population included: 38 breast, 32 colorectal, 31 LNH, HD and MM, 27 urogenital, 22 NSCLC and 19 pancreatic/gastric. With the Khorana score 49 pts were assigned to the low risk, 87 pts to the intermediate risk (57 with score=1, 28 with score=2), 16 pts (9.4%) to the high risk group (9 with score=3, 4 with score=4, 3 with score=5). When we considered 11 parameters 37 pts (21.8%) were assigned to the high risk group. Conclusions: A more comprehensive quantification of VTE risk, also considering new independent factors, is mandatory for a correct decision making of an antithrombotic-prophylactic approach.

scholarly journals The Risk of Stroke Using CHA2 DS2 -VASc Score in Hemodialysis Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Stroke Risk Factors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Patients undergoing hemodialysis are at increased risk of stroke. However, less known about the impact of some of the stroke risk factors, and the value of stroke risk scores in determining the risk in those patients. Our main goal. To assess the risk factors for stroke in hemodialysis patients and the use of the new CHA2DS2-VASc score for stroke assessment. Methods: Single center, retrospective cohort study of 336 patients undergoing hemodialysis from June 24, 2018, to September 6, 2018, was recruited. Baseline demographics, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. We calculated the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score for stroke assessment in all patients and categorized them into high, moderate and low risk patients according to CHA2 DS2 - VASc score and subcategorized them to two groups atrial fibrillation (AFib) and Non- Atrial fibrillation (Non AFib) patients. Results: 336 patients were included in our study; the majority of patients were at high risk with a CHA2 DS2 -VASc Score mean of 2.9± 1.5, although history of stroke was observed only in 15 patients (4.46%). According to CHA2 DS2 - VASc score, 280 patients were at high risk, 172 (51.19%) were high-risk patients on treatment (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) and 108(32.14%) patients were high risk patients not on treatment 48 were at moderate risk (14.28%) and 8 were at low risk (2.38 %). Patients were divided into subgroups as non-AFib and AFib. In non-AFib patients 320 (95.23%), high-risk patients 103 (32.18%) were not treated; high-risk patients with treatment are 162 (50.62%), moderate patients were 47 (14.68%), 8(2.5%) was in low risk. AFib patients were 16 with a mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score of 4.4±1.1. Patients with AFib were all at high risk except 1 was at moderate risk (6.25%). There were 11 (68.75%) patients on treatment and 5 (31.25%) patients not on treatment. The risk factors for stroke that were statistically significant in increasing score risk for all patients were: age > 65 (95% CI, -2.04– -1.29; p = 0.000), being female (95% CI, -1.36– -0.68; p = 0.000) hypertension (95% CI, -2.59– -1.37; p = 0.000), diabetes (95% CI, -2.10– -1.50; p = 0.000), CVD (95% CI, -2.07– -1.24; p=0.000), history of stroke or TIA (95% CI, -3.70– -2.03; p = 0.000), CHF or LVEF (95% CI, -2.28– - 0.91; p = 0.000). Conclusions: The risk of stroke in hemodialysis patients is significant according to the use of CHA2 DS2 -VASc score in Non-AFib hemodialysis patients shows supportive evidence of increased risk of stroke in those patients, which suggest the importance of close monitoring of patients with stroke risk factors by the nephrologist and the stroke team which will lead to the initiation of early prophylaxis in those patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document