scholarly journals Evaluation of the Circles Measurement and the ABC Classification of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110033
Author(s):  
Richard J. Murphy ◽  
Beat K. Moor ◽  
Piotr J. Lesniewski ◽  
Annabel Hayoz ◽  
Wolfan Alcantara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Acromioclavicular Joint ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Intrarater Reliability ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
Abc Classification ◽  
Projection Error

Background: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common. Despite this, it remains unclear how best to assess, classify, and manage these cases. A simple, reliable, valid, and accurate radiographic parameter to measure ACJ displacement would allow improved consistency of diagnosis and subsequent treatment pathways. Purpose: To evaluate “the circles measurement” and associated “ABC classification” as a tool for assessing ACJ displacement and injury classification. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: The circles measurement is taken from a lateral Alexander radiograph of the shoulder. The measurement is the center-to-center distance between 2 circles drawn to define the lateral extent of the clavicle and the anteromedial extent of the acromion; it is independent of the displacement plane, judging total ACJ displacement in any direction rather than trying to quantify vertical and/or horizontal displacement. When utilized clinically, the circles measurement is a single measurement calculated as the difference between values recorded for the injured and uninjured sides. Validation of the circles measurement was performed using lateral Alexander radiographs (including ±20° projection error in all planes) and computed tomography of standardized ACJ injury simulations. We assessed inter- and intrarater reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the circles measurement and subsequently generated a classification of ACJ injury based on displacement. Results: Reliability and validity of the circles measurement was excellent throughout. Interrater reliability (ICC [intraclass correlation coefficient] [2,1], 95% CI; n = 78; 4 observers) was 0.976 (0.964-0.985). Intrarater reliability (ICC [2,1]; 95% CI; n = 78; 2 measures) was 0.998 (0.996-0.998). Convergent validity (Pearson correlation coefficient, r) was 0.970 for ideal radiographs and 0.889 with ±20° projection error in all planes. Discriminant validity, with 1-way analysis of variance, showed a P value of <.0001 and effect size ( η2) of 0.960, with the ability to distinguish between the previously defined stable (Rockwood IIIA) and unstable (Rockwood IIIB) injuries. The results permitted objective, statistically sound parameters for the proposed ABC classification system. Conclusion: The circles measurement is a simple, reliable, valid, accurate, and resilient parameter for assessing ACJ displacement and can be used in conjunction with the proposed ABC classification to define ACJ injuries more accurately and objectively than previously described. Clinical Relevance: This novel parameter has the potential to standardize the initial assessment and possibly the subsequent clinical management of ACJ injuries, in addition to providing a standardized measure for future research.

Associations Among the MCMI-II Clinical Syndrome Scales and the MMPI-2 Clinical Scales

Assessment ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Blais ◽  
Kenneth B. Benedict ◽  
Dennis K. Norman
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Clinical Scales ◽  
Axis I

The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory—II (MCMI-II), a frequently used self-report measure of psychopathology, contains nine scales designed to assess Axis I psychopathology (the clinical syndrome and severe syndrome scales). This study explored the relationships among these nine MCMI-II clinical syndrome scales and the clinical scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 (MMPI-2). A sample of 108 psychiatric inpatients was administered both the MCMI-II and the MMPI-2 within 7 days of admission. Pearson correlation coefficients and principal component factors were obtained for the MCMI-II and MMPI-2 scales. The results provided support for the convergent validity of all the MCMI-II Axis I scales. However, the majority of the MCMI-II scales failed to demonstrate adequate discriminant validity in relation to the MMPI-2 scales. The principal component analysis revealed that method variance was the principal influence in determining factor loadings for the majority of test scales. This finding suggests that these two popular self-report tests differ substantially in how they measure psychopathology.

scholarly journals Quality of care in dysphagia patients: adaptation and validation of the Swedish SWAL-CARE questionnaire

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Hedström ◽  
Mia Johansson ◽  
Caroline Olsson ◽  
Lisa Tuomi ◽  
Caterina Finizia
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to adapt the instrument and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Swallowing Quality of Care questionnaire (S-SWAL-CARE) in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Methods Translation and adaptation of the original SWAL-CARE into Swedish was performed according to established international guidelines. Field testing was performed using 100 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia due to multiple reasons such as head and neck cancer and neurologic/neuromuscular disease, who had undergone swallowing evaluation within 6 months prior to the study. The patients answered the S-SWAL-CARE, the Quality from the Patient’s Perspective (QPP) and the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL). Test–retest was performed in 20% of the participants. The reliability and validity of the S-SWAL-CARE were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha as well as convergent and discriminative validity, respectively. Results The field testing of the S-SWAL-CARE resulted in sufficient reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha values exceeding 0.90 for all domains. All items correlated strongly to their own domain, with weaker correlations to the other domains, indicating proper scale structure. Results also indicate sufficient convergent and discriminant validity when tested for association to the QPP domains and the SWAL-QOL Total score. The test–retest reliability of the S-SWAL-CARE demonstrated sufficient intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the General advice domain (0.73) and Clinical advice domain (0.82). The ICC for the Patient satisfaction domain was lower (0.44). Conclusion The S-SWAL-CARE can be considered a reliable and valid tool to assess the dysphagia-related quality of care in a mixed Swedish dysphagia patient population.

The Construct Validity of the Tripartite Classification of Attitudes

1979 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Bagozzi ◽  
Alice M. Tybout ◽  
C. Samuel Craig ◽  
Brian Sternthal
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Tripartite Model ◽  
Normative Beliefs ◽  
Attitude Measures

The convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the tripartite model of attitudes is investigated. On the basis of a structural equation methodology, evidence is obtained for convergent validity. Moreover, a factor analysis of the attitude measures and measures of perceived extraneous events and personal and social normative beliefs provides evidence for discriminant validity. Finally, evidence for predictive validity based on actual and intended behaviors is found to be mixed. The implications of these findings for research pertaining to the prediction of consumer behavior are discussed.

An Enhanced and Efficient Multi-View Clustering Trust Inference Approach by GA Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 64-78
Author(s):  
Ravichandran M ◽  
Subramanian K M ◽  
Jothikumar R
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Pearson Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Trust Evaluation ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Benchmark Data ◽  
Implicit Trust ◽  
Trust Inference

Multi-view affinity propagation (MAP) methods are widely accepted techniques, measure the within-view clustering and clustering consistency. These suffer from similarity and correlation between clusters. The trust and similarity measured was introduced as a new approach to overcome the problem. But these approaches suffer from low accuracy and coverage due to avoidance of implicit trust. So, a framework called multi-view clustering based on gray affinity (MVC-GA) created by integrating both similarity and implicit trust. Similarity between two clusters is obtained by applying the Pearson Correlation Coefficient-based similarity. It utilizes the collaborative filter-based trust evaluation for each clustered view in terms of the similarity based on the gray affinity nn algorithm. Classification of incomplete occurrences is addressed based on GA Function. Experiments on the benchmark data sets have been performed to validate the proposed framework. It is shown that MVC-GA can improve the multi-view clustering accuracy and coverage.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Eurocest Neurotoxic Symptoms Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Firoozeh ◽  
A Kavousi ◽  
S Hassanzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Organic Solvents ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Persian Version

Introduction: Modified Euro Quest questionnaire to assess neurological and psychiatric effects caused by exposure to organic solvents is used. This study investigates the validity, reliability, and usability of the modified Euro Quest questionnaire in Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 206 workers of color and textile industries. Modified Euro Quest questionnaire was translated into Persian by using the forward-backward translation standard method. To evaluate the content validity, convergent validity, internal consistency, and reliability of the questionnaire were used the index CVI, Pearson correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest. The convergent validity was compared, results of the questionnaire, with results of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI). Results: The relationship between the modified Euroquest questionnaire was compare with the MMSE test and the MFI's questionnaire, Pearson correlation coefficients, and the results showed in order - 0.86 and 0.65, which represents a significant inverse correlation between this questionnaire with MMSE test(p>0.001) And a moderate correlation with the MFI's questionnaire(p>0.001). Content validity index (CVI) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were obtained in order amounts of ≤0.79 and 0.92, which was acceptable. The final questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, was calculated (α =0.84).  Conclusion: The modified Euroquest Persian version is a valuable tool to assess the neurological and psychological effects caused by exposure to organic solvents in Iranian workers. 

scholarly journals Development and Preliminary Validation of a Stroke Physical Activity Questionnaire

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Thunyakamon Phusuttatam ◽  
Jittima Saengsuwan ◽  
Pajeemas Kittipanya-ngam
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Chronic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Objective. The aim of the current study was to develop and then to determine preliminary validity of a physical activity questionnaire specifically designed for ambulatory, chronic stroke patients. Methods. This cross-sectional study recruited 92 chronic stroke patients. In Phase I, the SPAQ was developed and its content validity index (CVI) determined. In Phase II, we examined (1) the concurrent validity of SPAQ vs. the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF); (2) the convergent validity of SPAQ vs. the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), vs. the six-minute walk test (6-MWT), vs. the timed up and go test (TUGT), vs. the Motricity Index, vs. the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and vs. the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS); and (3) the discriminant validity of the SPAQ vs. the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The concurrent validity and convergent and divergent validity were analysed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The agreement between the SPAQ and IPAQ-SF was assessed using the Kappa statistic. Results. The SPAQ has 12 items in 3 main components which covers low (7 items), moderate (3 items), and vigorous (2 items) physical activity. The SPAQ had a CVI of 0.93. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) for SPAQ vs. IPAQ-SF was 0.53 (p < 0.001). The SPAQ yielded substantial agreement with the IPAQ-SF (Kappa = 0.65). For convergent validity, the SPAQ had a moderate correlation with the 6-MWT, MI, NIHSS, FAC, TUGT, and MRS (p < 0.05). For discriminant validity, the SPAQ was not correlated with the MoCA (rs = 0.061, p = 0.68). Conclusion. The SPAQ can be used to practically assess physical activity in chronic stroke patients, and it has acceptable psychometric properties which are comparable to other standard physical activity questionnaires. Future work should determine the validity of the SPAQ using an objective device such as an accelerometer.

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13)

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laércio Lima Luz ◽  
Lívia Maria Santiago ◽  
João Francisco Santos da Silva ◽  
Inês Echenique Mattos
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Spearman Correlation ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Brazilian Version

This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13). Interviews were carried out with individuals aged 60 years and over receiving care at an ambulatory cancer centre. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficients and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Construct validity was assessed by testing convergent and discriminant validity using principal component analysis and Varimax rotation. The Spearman correlation coefficient value of the comparison between test and retest scores was 0.98 (p < 0.001). All intraclass correlation coefficient values were higher than 0.60 and kappa coefficients varied between 0.33 and 0.94. Three identified factors explained 72.6% of overall sample variance. VES-13 presented good convergent validity and reasonable discriminant validity. The psychometric properties of the adapted version of the VES-13 are consistent and adequate for use with the Brazilian population.

CODEM Instrument

GeroPsych ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Kuemmel (This author contributed eq ◽  
Julia Haberstroh (This author contributed ◽  
Johannes Pantel
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Communication Behavior ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Pearson's R ◽  
Pearson’S R

Communication and communication behaviors in situational contexts are essential conditions for well-being and quality of life in people with dementia. Measuring methods, however, are limited. The CODEM instrument, a standardized observational communication behavior assessment tool, was developed and evaluated on the basis of the current state of research in dementia care and social-communicative behavior. Initially, interrater reliability was examined by means of videoratings (N = 10 people with dementia). Thereupon, six caregivers in six German nursing homes observed 69 residents suffering from dementia and used CODEM to rate their communication behavior. The interrater reliability of CODEM was excellent (mean κ = .79; intraclass correlation = .91). Statistical analysis indicated that CODEM had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .95). CODEM also showed excellent convergent validity (Pearson’s R = .88) as well as discriminant validity (Pearson’s R = .63). Confirmatory factor analysis verified the two-factor solution of verbal/content aspects and nonverbal/relationship aspects. With regard to the severity of the disease, the content and relational aspects of communication exhibited different trends. CODEM proved to be a reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment tool for examining communication behavior in the field of dementia. CODEM also provides researchers a feasible examination tool for measuring effects of psychosocial intervention studies that strive to improve communication behavior and well-being in dementia.

Validation of the German Version of the Exercise Dependence Scale

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Müller ◽  
Laurence Claes ◽  
Dirk Smits ◽  
Olaf Gefeller ◽  
Anja Hilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Exercise Dependence ◽  
German Population ◽  
German Version ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Eating Disorder Examination ◽  
Dependence Scale

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the German version of the 21-item Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS-G), which was administered in a large representative German sample (N = 1,611). In order to examine convergent validity, we also asked participants to answer the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). To investigate the discriminant validity, clients of fitness centers (N = 129), sport students (N = 85), and medical students (N = 129) filled out the EDS-G. In this German population-based sample, the seven-factor structure suggested by the original authors as well as a higher-order model (7 + 1 factor model) were supported. The total EDS-G scale showed an excellent internal reliability and was positively related to the EDE-Q total and subscale scores. The EDS-G scores differentiated between samples with varying degrees of exercise. In summary, the results indicate that the EDS-G is a psychometrically sound and potentially valid brief measure for the assessment of exercise dependence symptoms.

Development and Construct Validation of the German Workplace Trust Survey (G-WTS)

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock ◽  
Simone Kauffeld
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Affective Commitment ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Organizational Context ◽  
Organizational Trust ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Reliable Assessment ◽  
Workplace Trust

In research on trust in the organizational context, there is some agreement evolving that trust should be measured with respect to various foci. The Workplace Trust Survey (WTS) by Ferres (2002) provides reliable assessment of coworker, supervisor, and organizational trust. By means of a functionally equivalent translation, we developed a German version of the questionnaire (G-WTS) comprising 21 items. A total of 427 employees were surveyed with the G-WTS and questionnaires concerning several work-related attitudes and behaviors and 92 of these completed the survey twice. The hypothesized three-dimensional conceptualization of organizational trust was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The G-WTS showed good internal consistency and retest reliability values. Concerning convergent validity, all of the three G-WTS dimensions positively predicted job satisfaction. In terms of discriminant validity, Coworker Trust enhanced group cohesion; Supervisor Trust fostered innovative behavior, while Organizational Trust was associated with affective commitment. Theoretical and practical contributions as well as opportunities for future research with the G-WTS are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document