scholarly journals Racial/ethnic disparities in disability outcomes among post-acute home care patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1406-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo-Ana D. Chase ◽  
Liming Huang ◽  
David Russell ◽  
Alexandra Hanlon ◽  
Melissa O’Connor ◽  
...  

Objective: To examine activities of daily living (ADL) disability outcomes among racially/ethnically diverse elders receiving home care (HC) after hospitalization. Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of single-agency, 2013-2014 Outcome and Assessment Information Set data from older adults who received post-hospitalization HC ( n = 20,674). We measured overall change in ADL disability by summing the difference of standardized admission and discharge scores from nine individual ADL. Associations between race/ethnicity and overall ADL change scores were modeled using general linear regression, adjusting for covariates consistent with the Disablement Model. Results: Overall, patients experienced improvement in ADL disability from HC admission to discharge. However, Asian, African American, and Hispanic patients experienced significantly less improvement compared with non-Hispanic Whites (all p < .001), even after controlling for covariates. Discussion: Racial/ethnic disparities exist in ADL disability improvement among HC patients. Research is needed to clarify mechanisms underlying these disparities. Disablement Model factors may be targets for clinical intervention.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6547-6547
Author(s):  
Abdul-Rahman Jazieh ◽  
Mark Riffon ◽  
Jennifer C. King ◽  
Gabrielle Betty Rocque ◽  
Electra D. Paskett ◽  
...  

6547 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted all facets of healthcare delivery including cancer care. This study evaluates the disruptions to US medical oncology practice during the pandemic in terms of number and type of patients (pts) encounters to determine the impact on continuity of patient care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the CLQD electronic health record database, containing data from 2+ million pts from all 50 states. We assessed changes in the monthly proportions of visit encounter types (in-person outpatient [IPOP] and telehealth [TE]) for new and established patients (NP and EP) with an invasive malignancy, benign or in situ neoplasm, or benign hematology diagnosis having an encounter between 1/1/2018 and 9/30/2020. Results: 781,945 pts were studied. Median age on 1/1/2018 was 64 years (IQR: 53-73), 38% were female, and 58% had an invasive malignancy. From 12/2019 to 9/2020, total monthly encounters dropped from 157,964 to 90,662. Monthly IPOP visits for NP dropped from 11.2% to 7.9%, an absolute drop of 3.3% and a relative drop of 30%; TE for NP increased by 1.1% (Table). Monthly IPOP visits for EP, as a percentage of all visits, dropped from 94.4% to 86.6% from 12/2019 to 6/2020 but rebounded to 90.4% by 9/2020. Fraction of TE increased substantially during the pandemic period reaching a peak in 6/2020 (13.8% for EP and 1.6% for NP) and decreased in 9/2020 to 9.6% and 1.1% for EP and NP, respectively. Compared to non-Hispanic patients, Hispanic patients had a larger reduction in IPOP and more TE during the study period. Percentage of monthly encounters, by type, from baseline*. Conclusions: We observed a reduction in the absolute number and monthly percentage of IPOP encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic. For EP, increases in TE does not fully compensate for reductions in IPOP. The reduction in IPOP NP encounters is particularly concerning since it was not accompanied by a compensatory increase in TE. The reduction in NP is consistent with reported pandemic-associated reductions in cancer screening and suggest a notable delay in cancer diagnoses during the pandemic. Reduction in Hispanic IPOP encounters warrants further evaluation.[Table: see text]


Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Summer Chavez ◽  
Ryan Huebinger ◽  
Kevin Schulz ◽  
Hei Kit Chan ◽  
Micah Panczyk ◽  
...  

Introduction: Prior research shows a greater disease burden, lower BCPR rates, and worse outcomes in Black and Hispanic patients after OHCA. The CDC has declared that the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected many racial and ethnic minority groups. However, the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on OHCA incidence and outcomes in different races and ethnicities is unknown. Purpose: To describe racial/ethnic disparities in OHCA incidence, processes of care and outcomes in Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We used data from the Texas Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) comparing adult OHCA from the pre-pandemic period (March 11 - December 31, 2019) to the pandemic period (March 11- December 31, 2020). The racial and ethnic categories were White, Black, Hispanic or Other. Outcomes were rates of BCPR, AED use, sustained ROSC, prehospital termination of resuscitation (TOR), survival to hospital admission, survival to discharge and good neurological outcomes. We fit a mixed effect logistic regression model, with EMS agency designated as the random intercept to obtain aORs. We adjusted for the pandemic and other covariates. Results: A total of 8,070 OHCAs were included. The proportion of cardiac arrests increased for Blacks (903 to 1, 113, 24.9% to 25.5%) and Hispanics (935 to 1,221, 25.8% to 27.5%) and decreased for Whites (1 595 to 1,869, 44.0% to 42.1%) and Other (194 to 220, 5.4% to 5.0%) patients. Compared to Whites, Black (aOR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82) and Hispanic patients (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.87) were less likely to receive BCPR. Compared to Whites, Blacks were less likely to have sustained ROSC (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.93%), with lower rates of survival to hospital admission (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.0), and worse neurological outcomes (aOR = 0.45, 95% 0.28-0.73). Hispanics were less likely to have prehospital TOR compared to Whites (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99). The Utstein bystander survival rate was worse for Blacks (aOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.97) and Hispanics (aOR = 0.71, 95% 0.53-0.95) compared to Whites. Conclusion: Racial and ethnic disparities persisted during the COVID-19 pandemic in Texas.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Labgold ◽  
Sarah Hamid ◽  
Sarita Shah ◽  
Neel R. Gandhi ◽  
Allison Chamberlain ◽  
...  

AbstractBlack, Hispanic, and Indigenous persons in the United States have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and death from COVID-19, due to persistent social inequities. The magnitude of the disparity is unclear, however, because race/ethnicity information is often missing in surveillance data. In this study, we quantified the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and case fatality rates in an urban county by racial/ethnic group using combined race/ethnicity imputation and quantitative bias-adjustment for misclassification. After bias-adjustment, the magnitude of the absolute racial/ethnic disparity, measured as the difference in infection rates between classified Black and Hispanic persons compared to classified White persons, increased 1.3-fold and 1.6-fold respectively. These results highlight that complete case analyses may underestimate absolute disparities in infection rates. Collecting race/ethnicity information at time of testing is optimal. However, when data are missing, combined imputation and bias-adjustment improves estimates of the racial/ethnic disparities in the COVID-19 burden.


2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Cortés–Sanabria ◽  
Brenda E. Rodríguez–Arreola ◽  
Victor R. Ortiz–Juárez ◽  
Herman Soto–Molina ◽  
Leonardo Pazarín–Villaseñor ◽  
...  

ObjectiveWe set out to estimate the direct medical costs (DMCs) of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to compare the DMCs for continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (APD). In addition, DMCs according to age, sex, and the presence of peritonitis were evaluated.MethodsOur retrospective cohort analysis considered patients initiating PD, calculating 2008 costs and, for comparison, updating the results for 2010. The analysis took the perspective of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, including outpatient clinic and emergency room visits, dialysis procedures, medications, laboratory tests, hospitalizations, and surgeries.ResultsNo baseline differences were observed for the 41 patients evaluated (22 on CAPD, 19 on APD). Median annual DMCs per patient on PD were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. When analyzing percentage distribution, no differences were found in the DMCs for the modality groups. In both APD and CAPD, the main costs pertained to the dialysis procedure (CAPD 41%, APD 47%) and hospitalizations (CAPD 37%, APD 32%). Dialysis procedures cost significantly more ( p = 0.001) in APD (US$7084) than in CAPD (US$6071), but total costs (APD US$15 389 vs CAPD US$14 798) and other resources were not different. The presence of peritonitis increased the total costs (US$16 075 vs US$14 705 for patients without peritonitis, p = 0.05), but in the generalized linear model analysis, DMCs were not predicted by age, sex, dialysis modality, or peritonitis. A similar picture was observed for costs extrapolated to 2010, with a 10% – 20% increase for each component—except for laboratory tests, which increased 52%, and dialysis procedures, which decreased 3%, from 2008.ConclusionsThe annual DMCs per patient on PD in this study were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. Total DMCs for dialysis procedures were higher in APD than in CAPD, but the difference was not statistically significant. In both APD and CAPD, 90% of costs were attributable to the dialysis procedure, hospitalizations, and medications. In a multivariate analysis, no independent variable significantly predicted a higher DMC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Peberdy

Abstract Aim Frailty is increasingly recognised as an important factor for patients under the care of surgical departments. Pre-tibial injury is a common presenting problem to plastic surgery units across the UK. We wanted to assess the 1-year mortality of this patient cohort presenting to our unit. Method Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively maintained clinical database across a calendar year from June 2017 to June 2018. This was perforemd at a UK Regional Plastic Surgery Centre analysinig patients presenting to the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital. Patients were scored as either frail (Rockwood ≥ 5) or Non-Frail (Rockwood ≤ 4) taken from initial clinical assessment proformas. Results A total of 85 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 76.4 (± 18 years), and mean Rockwood Frailty Score of 3.4. Across all patients presenting to the plastic surgery department with pre-tibial injury there was a 20% (17/85) mortality at one year. In frail patients 1 year mortality was 47.6% (10/21). In Non-Frail patients 1 year mortality was 10.9% (7/64). The difference in mortalitly at 1 year was found to be significantly different in Frail vs Non-Frail patients with P = 0.00009 in an unpaired Student's t Test. Conclusions Frailty is a common condition in patients presenting with pre-tibial injury. This is a significant predictor of 1 year mortality in patients presenting with pre-tibial injury. Standardised evidence-based pathways of care for these patients could help optimise their management. Opportunities for MDT involvement in their care may improve outcomes.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1985-1985
Author(s):  
Sara Marie Tinsley-Vance ◽  
Najla Al Ali ◽  
Somedeb Ball ◽  
Akriti G Jain ◽  
Luis E. E. Aguirre ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There is a paucity of research on racial and ethnic disparities in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Research focused on racial and ethnic disparities for MDS is essential to improve knowledge and understanding to deliver racial and ethnic sensitive care. There are limited studies that delineate the incidence of cytogenetic and molecular features of MDS by race and ethnicity (Yan, et al. 2021, Ramadan, et al.,2016). The aim of this abstract is to report the difference in clinical phenotype, genotype and outcomes of White, Black and Hispanics from a large MDS data base. Methods: Adult patients were identified through the Moffitt Cancer Center MDS data base and divided into racial/ethnic categories. Fisher exact test and chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables. Univariate survival analysis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: From analysis of 4414 patients with MDS, 4131 (93%) were White, 116 (3%) Black and 167 (4%) Hispanic. Table-1 summarizes baseline characteristics. There were more Black and Hispanic women diagnosed with MDS (p &lt; .001). Black and Hispanic patients were younger at diagnosis (p&lt;0.01), Hispanic patients had a lower platelet count at baseline (p=0.02). There were no racial differences in WHO 2016 MDS classification or disease risk according to R-IPSS. Black MDS patients had less complex karyotype (p&lt;0.05) while abnormalities in chromosome 5 were more common in White patients 785(19.6%, p&lt;0.05). Table-2 summarizes somatic mutations (SM) landscape among the different racial groups, IDH2 SM (p=0. 01) and NPM-1 SM (p=.004) were more common in Black MDS patients. MPL (p &lt; 0.005) was observed more frequently among Hispanic patients. There was no difference in response to any modality of treatment based on race. Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant 50 (29.9%, p&lt;0.01). Clinical trial participation rates among the groups were similar. The median overall survival (mOS) was 35 months (mo), 31 mo, and 52.5 mo for White, Black and Hispanic patients respectively, p= .01 shown in Figure 1. For very low/low R-IPSS the mOS was 67.6, 52 and 93 mo respectively, p= .028, Figure 2a. For intermediate risk R-IPSS the mOS was 33, 30 and 51 mo respectively, p=0.2, and for high/very high-risk R-IPSS the mOS was 16.8, 21.7, and 25 mo respectively, p=.025. See Figures 2b and 2c. There was no difference in rate of AML transformation Conclusions: This large retrospective study revealed racial/ethnic differences in clinical and molecular features of MDS. Hispanic patients had better overall survival. Continued research in this area is recommended to better understand the phenotype and genotype of patients from diverse ethnic/racial backgrounds. Acknowledgement of Funding: NINR Grant # 1K23NR018488-01A Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tinsley-Vance: Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Taiho: Consultancy; Fresenius Kabi: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Padron: Stemline: Honoraria; Blueprint: Honoraria; Kura: Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet: Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Kuykendall: PharmaEssentia: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Prelude: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BluePrint Medicines: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Protagonist: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sallman: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji: AbbVie: Consultancy; Geron: Consultancy; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acceleron: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 1054-1055
Author(s):  
J. Chase ◽  
L. Huang ◽  
D. Russell ◽  
A. Hanlon ◽  
M. O’Connor ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Rischard ◽  
Milena Radeva ◽  
Erika B Rosenzweig ◽  
Robert Frantz ◽  
Paul Hassoun ◽  
...  

Intro: Recent World Symposium of Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) Group 1 data indicate significant racial and ethnic disparities in disease severity and mortality. It is unclear if these differences extend to other forms of PH and if they are a reflection of comorbidities. The PVDOMICS program incorporates deep phenotyping across all WSPH groups allowing for a first-time side-by-side comparison. The aims of this study are to evaluate inter-racial/ethnic factors of disease severity and comorbidities among patients with PH. Methods/Results: Participants in PVDOMICS prospectively underwent comprehensive testing for echocardiography, PFT, chest imaging, 6-minute walk, cardiac MRI, and hemodynamics with provocation. WSPH group assignment was assessed according to guideline recommendations. Race and ethnicity were self-reported. Statistical testing and sample sizes are described in the Table . In 692 PH participants, Non-Hispanic whites (NHW) were older and more often male than non-Hispanic African American (AA) and Hispanic patients. WSPH Group 1 was less but Groups 4 and 5 more common in AA than NHW. There were no inter-race/ethnicity differences in the percent of PH patients on PH therapy (range 53-63%, p=0.23). Comorbidities such as diabetes and lung disease were more common in AA vs. NHW. Hispanics showed lower left atrial (LA) volume on echo, LA filling pressures with exercise, as well as increased cardiac index relative to NHW. Right ventricular function on cardiac MRI was similar between groups ( Table ). When WSPH Group 1 was analyzed separately, inter-racial/ethnic comparisons were generally similar. Conclusions: Significant inter-racial/ethnic differences are evident across all WSPH groups. Comorbidities appear to drive part of the differences among AA patients while Hispanic patients exhibit factors that may prove beneficial. How these differences contribute to varying disease risk and outcomes across race and ethnicity remain to be seen.


CMAJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. E360-E370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Jones ◽  
Susan E. Bronskill ◽  
Gina Agarwal ◽  
Hsien Seow ◽  
David Feeny ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 89-89
Author(s):  
Mallik Greene ◽  
Eunice Chang ◽  
Ann Hartry ◽  
Michael Broder

INTRODUCTION:Existing findings on effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) versus oral antipsychotics in preventing hospitalizations are inconclusive. This study was conducted to compare hospitalization costs between Medicaid patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who initiated a LAI and those who changed from one oral antipsychotic to another.METHODS:This retrospective cohort analysis used the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan® Medicaid claims database to study patients ≥18 years with schizophrenia. The two cohorts were: “LAI”, defined as initiating LAI (no prior LAI therapy) between 1 January 2013 and 30 June 2014; and “oral”, defined as changing from one oral antipsychotic to another during the same period. The first day of LAI or the new oral antipsychotic was the index date. A linear regression model was conducted to estimate hospitalization costs.RESULTS:The final sample included 2,861 (36.7 percent) LAI and 4,926 (63.3 percent) oral users. Compared to oral users, LAI patients were younger (mean (Standard Deviation, SD): 39.9 (13.2) versus 42.7 (13.1); p<.001) and had a lower mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (mean (SD): 1.1 (1.9) versus 1.7 (2.3); p<.001). Of the 877 LAI initiators and 1,688 oral users who were hospitalized during the 1-year post-index follow-up period, the unadjusted mean hospitalization costs for LAI and oral users were USD32,626 and USD36,048, respectively. After adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, baseline medication use, and baseline ED or hospitalizations, the adjusted average hospitalization costs were USD1,170 lower in LAI initiators than oral users. None of the unadjusted or adjusted differences were statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS:This real-world study suggests that among hospitalized patients, hospitalization costs are lower in LAI initiators than in oral antipsychotic users, although the difference is not statistically significant. Our study is limited as our results are reflective of a multi-state Medicaid population. Future studies are warranted to confirm the results in non-Medicaid patient populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document