scholarly journals Causes of swine polyserositis in a high-density breeding area in Italy

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 594-597
Author(s):  
Cristian Salogni ◽  
Massimiliano Lazzaro ◽  
Stefano Giovannini ◽  
Nicoletta Vitale ◽  
Maria Beatrice Boniotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza A ◽  
Pasteurella Multocida ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
High Density ◽  
Porcine Circovirus ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
Breeding Area ◽  
Causative Agents ◽  
Bacterial Coinfection

We assessed the causes of polyserositis in pigs, categorized by causative agents and ages of animals affected. In a 3-y study, 246 pigs from 80 different farms with recurrent problems of polyserositis, in a high-density breeding area, were submitted for autopsy; 154 pigs with typical fibrinous serosal lesions were sampled for further bacterial and viral investigation. The most common gross lesions were pleuritis and pericarditis (141 of 154; 92%). The animals most affected were weaned pigs (139 of 154; 90%). Haemophilus parasuis and Mycoplasma hyorhinis were the most common bacteria detected and were present at the same rate (85 of 154; 55%). Other bacteria isolated were Streptococcus sp. (44 of 154; 29%), Pasteurella multocida (21 of 154; 14%), Escherichia coli (19 of 154; 12%), Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (7 of 154; 5%), and Trueperella pyogenes (4 of 154; 3%). Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV; 119 of 154; 77%) predominated among the viruses detected, followed, with lesser prevalence, by porcine circovirus 2 (40 of 154; 26%) and swine influenza A virus (19 of 154; 12%). Bacterial coinfection and coinfection of bacteria and viruses were common (128 of 154; 83%). A strong positive correlation was found between coinfection by H. parasuis and M. hyorhinis and also by H. parasuis with PRRSV.

Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Opriessnig ◽  
L. G. Giménez-Lirola ◽  
P. G. Halbur
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Pasteurella Multocida ◽  
Bacterial Pathogens ◽  
Swine Influenza Virus ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
The Body ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Porcine Circovirus ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Respiratory Pathogens

AbstractRespiratory disease in pigs is common in modern pork production worldwide and is often referred to as porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC). PRDC is polymicrobial in nature, and results from infection with various combinations of primary and secondary respiratory pathogens. As a true multifactorial disease, environmental conditions, population size, management strategies and pig-specific factors such as age and genetics also play critical roles in the outcome of PRDC. While non-infectious factors are important in the initiation and outcome of cases of PRDC, the focus of this review is on infectious factors only. There are a variety of viral and bacterial pathogens commonly associated with PRDC including porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), swine influenza virus (SIV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2),Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae(MHYO) andPasteurella multocida(PMULT). The pathogenesis of viral respiratory disease is typically associated with destruction of the mucocilliary apparatus and with interference and decrease of the function of pulmonary alveolar and intravascular macrophages. Bacterial pathogens often contribute to PRDC by activation of inflammation via enhanced cytokine responses. With recent advancements in pathogen detection methods, the importance of polymicrobial disease has become more evident, and identification of interactions of pathogens and their mechanisms of disease potentiation has become a topic of great interest. For example, combined infection of pigs with typically low pathogenic organisms like PCV2 and MHYO results in severe respiratory disease. Although the body of knowledge has advanced substantially in the last 15 years, much more needs to be learned about the pathogenesis and best practices for control of swine respiratory disease outbreaks caused by concurrent infection of two or more pathogens. This review discusses the latest findings on polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs.

scholarly journals Respiratory viral infections drive different lung cytokine profiles in pigs

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Turlewicz-Podbielska ◽  
Ewelina Czyżewska-Dors ◽  
Małgorzata Pomorska-Mól
Keyword(s):  
Influenza A ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
Cytokine Response ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Local Concentration ◽  
Lung Pathology ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Local Cytokine

Abstract Background Swine influenza A virus (IAV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) are considered key viral pathogens involved in the porcine respiratory disease complex. Concerning the effect of one virus on another with respect to local immune response is still very limited. Determination of presence and quantity of cytokines in the lung tissue and its relation to the lung pathology can lead to a better understanding of the host inflammatory response and its influence on the lung pathology during single or multi-virus infection. The aim of the present study was to explore and compare the patterns of lung cytokine protein response in pigs after single or dual infection with swine IAV and/or PRRSV. Results Inoculation with IAV alone causes an increase in lung concentration of IFN-α, IFN-ɣ, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10, especially at 2 and 4 DPI. In PRRSV group, beyond early IFN-α, IFN-ɣ, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 induction, elevated levels of cytokines at 10 and 21 DPI have been found. In IAV+PRRSV inoculated pigs the lung concentrations of all cytokines were higher than in control pigs. Conclusions Current results indicate that experimental infection of pigs with IAV or PRRSV alone and co-infection with both pathogens induce different kinetics of local cytokine response. Due to strong positive correlation between local TNF-α and IL-10 concentration and lung pathology, we hypothesize that these cytokines are involved in the induction of lung lesions during investigates infection. Nevertheless, no apparent increase in lung cytokine response was seen in pigs co-inoculated simultaneously with both pathogens compared to single inoculated groups. It may also explain no significant effect of co-infection on the lung pathology and pathogen load, compared to single infections. Strong correlation between local concentration of TNF-α, IFN-ɣ, IL-8 and SwH1N1 load in the lung, as well as TNF-α, IL-8 and PRRSV lung titres suggested that local replication of both viruses also influenced the local cytokine response during infection.

scholarly journals Current Swine Respiratory Diseases Morphology in Intensive Swine Production in Serbia

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-36
Author(s):  
Jasna Prodanov-Radulović ◽  
Ivana Vučićević ◽  
Vladimir Polaček ◽  
Sanja Aleksić-Kovačević
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Pasteurella Multocida ◽  
Pseudorabies Virus ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Swine Influenza Virus ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
Porcine Circovirus ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Viral Pathogens ◽  
Pig Production

AbstractSwine respiratory diseases represent one of the most frequent health issues in pig production worldwide. Despite the great progress that has been made in the field of diagnostics, control and prophylaxis, respiratory diseases still remain the most challenging health problem in modern commercial pig production. The list of infectious agents that cause respiratory diseases in swine is extensive and includes both, bacterial and viral pathogens. In Serbia, more than fifteen years after the introduction of modern vaccines, the list of bacterial pathogens related to swine respiratory infections still include Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Haemophilus parasuis and Pasteurella multocida. On the other hand, most commonly involved viral pathogens are Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus, Swine influenza virus, Porcine circovirus type 2 and Pseudorabies virus. The morphological features of pneumonia where several agents are involved, depend on the predominant etiological agent. Expanding knowledge of the main pathogens associated with swine respiratory diseases and the effects of their interactions on the disease outcome is important for further investigations of lung diseases and implementation of control strategies in commercial pig populations in Serbia. This review discusses the latest findings on swine respiratory disease and current trends in Serbian pig production.

scholarly journals Kinetics of single and dual simultaneous infection of pigs with swine influenza A virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1903-1913
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Pomorska‐Mól ◽  
Katarzyna Podgórska ◽  
Ewelina Czyżewska‐Dors ◽  
Hanna Turlewicz‐Podbielska ◽  
Maciej Gogulski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Simultaneous Infection ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Swine Influenza A Virus

scholarly journals Detection of respiratory viruses in cases of porcine respiratory disease in nurseries.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard Martín-Valls ◽  
Yanli Li ◽  
Ivan Díaz ◽  
Esmeralda Cano ◽  
Silvana Sosa Portugal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Influenza B ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Porcine Circoviruses ◽  
The One ◽  
Respiratory Coronavirus ◽  
Porcine Respiratory

Respiratory disease in weaned pigs is a common problem in the field, with a complex aetiology of both viruses and bacteria. In the present study, we investigated the presence of eleven viruses in nasal swabs collected from nurseries (fifty-five clinical outbreaks) under the suspicion of swine influenza A virus (swIAV) by cough and fever. The other ten viruses included influenza B (IBV) and influenza D viruses (IDV), Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), Porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), Porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), porcine circoviruses 2 (PCV2), 3 (PCV3) and 4 (PCV), Porcine parainfluenza 1 virus (PPIV1) and Swine orthopneumovirus (SOV). Twenty-nine swIAV-positive cases and twenty-six cases of swIAV-negative respiratory disease were primarily established. IBV, IBD, PCV4 and PPIV1 were not found in any case, while PRCV, SOV, and PCMV were more likely to be found in swIAV-positive nurseries with respiratory disease ( p<0.05) although, globally, PCV3, PRRSV, and PCMV were the most frequently detected agents on herd level. At an individual level, the prevalence of different viruses was: swIAV 48.6%; PRCV 48.0%; PRRSV 31.6%; SOV 33.8%; PCMV 48.3%, PCV2 36.0%; and PCV3 33.0%. Beyond that, it was common to find animals with low Ct values (< 30) for all agents except for PCV2 and PCV3. When analysed the association between different pathogens, PRCV was the one with the most associations. It positively interacted ( p < 0.05) with swIAV and SOV but was negatively associated ( p < 0.05) with PRRSV and PCVM. Besides these, swIAV and PRRSV were negatively related (p < 0.05). Further analysis of suckling pigs showed that circulation of PRCV, PCMV, SOV, and PCV3 started in the maternities, suggesting a role of the sows in the transmission. Overall, our data may contribute to a better understanding of the complex aetiology and the epidemiology of respiratory disease in weaners. This is the first report of SOV in Spain.

scholarly journals Successive Inoculations of Pigs with Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus 1 (PRRSV-1) and Swine H1N2 Influenza Virus Suggest a Mutual Interference between the Two Viral Infections

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2169
Author(s):  
Juliette Bougon ◽  
Céline Deblanc ◽  
Patricia Renson ◽  
Stéphane Quéguiner ◽  
Stéphane Gorin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza A ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
Time Correlation ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Cell Mediated Immune Response ◽  
Specific Pathogen ◽  
Porcine Respiratory

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza A virus (swIAV) are major pathogens of the porcine respiratory disease complex, but little is known on their interaction in super-infected pigs. In this study, we investigated clinical, virological and immunological outcomes of successive infections with PRRSV-1 and H1N2 swIAV. Twenty-four specific pathogen-free piglets were distributed into four groups and inoculated either with PRRSV at study day (SD) 0, or with swIAV at SD8, or with PRRSV and swIAV one week apart at SD0 and SD8, respectively, or mock-inoculated. In PRRSV/swIAV group, the clinical signs usually observed after swIAV infection were attenuated while higher levels of anti-swIAV antibodies were measured in lungs. Concurrently, PRRSV multiplication in lungs was significantly affected by swIAV infection, whereas the cell-mediated immune response specific to PRRSV was detected earlier in blood, as compared to PRRSV group. Moreover, levels of interferon (IFN)-α measured from SD9 in the blood of super-infected pigs were lower than those measured in the swIAV group, but higher than in the PRRSV group at the same time. Correlation analyses suggested an important role of IFN-α in the two-way interference highlighted between both viral infections.

scholarly journals Co-Infection of Swine with Porcine Circovirus Type 2 and Other Swine Viruses

Viruses ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Ouyang ◽  
Xinwei Zhang ◽  
Xiaohua Liu ◽  
Linzhu Ren
Keyword(s):  
Swine Influenza Virus ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
Classical Swine Fever ◽  
Porcine Circovirus Type ◽  
Porcine Circovirus ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Host Immune System ◽  
Current State ◽  
The World

Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) is the etiological agent that causes porcine circovirus diseases and porcine circovirus-associated diseases (PCVD/PCVAD), which are present in every major swine-producing country in the world. PCV2 infections may downregulate the host immune system and enhance the infection and replication of other pathogens. However, the exact mechanisms of PCVD/PCVAD are currently unknown. To date, many studies have reported that several cofactors, such as other swine viruses or bacteria, vaccination failure, and stress or crowding, in combination with PCV2, lead to PCVD/PCVAD. Among these cofactors, co-infection of PCV2 with other viruses, such as porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, porcine parvovirus, swine influenza virus and classical swine fever virus have been widely studied for decades. In this review, we focus on the current state of knowledge regarding swine co-infection with different PCV2 genotypes or strains, as well as with PCV2 and other swine viruses.

scholarly journals Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Interferes with Swine Influenza A Virus Infection of Epithelial Cells

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Georges Saade ◽  
Déborah Ménard ◽  
Caroline Hervet ◽  
Patricia Renson ◽  
Erika Hue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Swine Influenza ◽  
Interferon Response ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Tracheal Epithelial Cells ◽  
Respiratory Epithelial

Respiratory infections are still a major concern in pigs. Amongst the involved viruses, the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and the swine influenza type A virus (swIAV) have a major impact. These viruses frequently encounter and dual infections are reported. We analyzed here the molecular interactions between viruses and porcine tracheal epithelial cells as well as lung tissue. PRRSV-1 species do not infect porcine respiratory epithelial cells. However, PRRSV-1, when inoculated simultaneously or shortly before swIAV, was able to inhibit swIAV H1N2 infection, modulate the interferon response and alter signaling protein phosphorylations (ERK, AKT, AMPK, and JAK2), in our conditions. SwIAV inhibition was also observed, although at a lower level, by inactivated PRRSV-1, whereas acid wash treatment inactivating non-penetrated viruses suppressed the interference effect. PRRSV-1 and swIAV may interact at several stages, before their attachment to the cells, when they attach to their receptors, and later on. In conclusion, we showed for the first time that PRRSV can alter the relation between swIAV and its main target cells, opening the doors to further studies on the interplay between viruses. Consequences of these peculiar interactions on viral infections and vaccinations using modified live vaccines require further investigations.

scholarly journals Molecular detection of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus, Porcine Circovirus 2 and Hepatitis E Virus in oral fluid compared to detection in faeces and serum.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Plut ◽  
Urska Jamnikar-Ciglenecki ◽  
Marina Stukelj
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis E Virus ◽  
Pathogen Detection ◽  
Oral Fluid ◽  
Hepatitis E ◽  
Viral Disease ◽  
Porcine Circovirus Type ◽  
Porcine Circovirus ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Causative Agents

Abstract Background Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2) and Hepatitis E virus (HEV) are common and economically important viral disease causative agents detected in pig oral fluid (OF), faeces and serum at some infection stages. The purpose of this study was to detect and compare PRRSV, PCV2 and HEV on six pig farms to determine which of the three sample types, OF, faeces or serum is appropriate for the diagnosis of these viruses in different pig categories. The following pig categories were included in the study: 5 weeks-old (w/o), 7 w/o, 9 w/o, 11 w/o weaners, fatteners and breeding sows. Pursuant to preliminary detection of each pathogen at the selected farms, OF samples, faeces, serum pools and 10 individual sera were tested with PCR for each age category. If any of the viruses were found in pools of faeces and OF, then faeces and OF from positive farms were tested separately for each pig category. The nucleic acid isolated from the samples was detected with RT-PCR, PCR and real-time RT-PCR for PRRSV, PCV2 and HEV respectively. Results PRRSV and HEV were detected on one farm and PCV2 on three others, positive results being more often obtained from the OF than from the faeces of the same animals. Testing of 10 individual sera samples from pigs from the same group of pigs was also performed, and detected the virus in individual sera and OF in the same pig category, with some exceptions: PRRSV was detected in the OF of fatteners but was absent in their sera; PCV2 was detected in sera but absent in group samples or vice-versa but OF sample , whereas HEV was detected in the OF of the youngest, 5w/o weaners and absent in sera of the same age group. Conclusions The primary finding of the study is that OF is a welfare-friendly, non-invasive and highly efficient matrix for pathogen detection, thus evidencing the utility of pig OF as a matrix in which each of the three viruses considered can be detected with the highest probability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document