Embedding Performance Assessments for Leaders into Preparation

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-314
Author(s):  
Margaret Terry Orr ◽  
Liz Hollingworth ◽  
Janice Cook
Keyword(s):  
Leadership Development ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Performance Assessments ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Embedding Performance ◽  
Principal Preparation Program

This article presents pilot study results of two leadership performance assessments, designed for a California principal preparation program and embedded in preparation using two learning approaches. The pilot study had two purposes: to evaluate the assessments‘ content validity and to evaluate the candidates’ leadership skills as demonstrated through their assessment products and an independent self-assessment tool. The evidence showed the tasks to be valid and useful tools for formative leadership development for different candidates and school settings. Participant feedback on the assessments‘ benefits and independent self-assessment ratings provided construct validation. We concluded that these are promising assessment tools for programs’ use in candidate assessment.

scholarly journals P130: Feasibility of self-assessing functional status in older emergency department patients

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S111-S111
Author(s):  
V. Boucher ◽  
V. Boucher ◽  
M. Lamontagne ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
M. Émond
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Activities Of Daily Living ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Medical Reason ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) guidelines recommend systematic screening of older patients for geriatric syndromes. However, compliance issues to this recommendation have already been observed. Self-assessment tools could be an interesting solution as self-assessed general, mental and physical health was shown to be predictive of functional decline and mortality. The Older Americans Resources and Services scale (OARS), is a simple geriatric functional assessment scale that is widely used by professionals to quantify patients’ ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). However, its use as a self-assessment tool has never been tested. Objective: to evaluate the feasibility of the self-assessed OARS compared to its standard administration by a research assistant (RA) in older ED patients. Methods: A planned sub-analysis of a single center randomized crossover pilot study in 2018 was realized. Patients aged ≥65 who consulted to the ED for any medical reason were included. Patients were excluded if they: 1) required resuscitation (CTAS 1); 2) were unable to consent/to speak French; 3) had a physical condition preventing the use of an electronic tablet. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either 1) tablet-based functional status self-assessment or 2) the RAs questionnaire administration at first, after which they crossed-over to the other assessment method. Paired t-tests were used to assess the score differences. Results: 60 patients were included. Mean age was 74.4 ± 7.6 and 34 (56.7%) participants were women. Mean OARS score according to RA was 25.1 ± 3.3 and mean self-assessed OARS score was 26.4 ± 2.5 (p < 0.0001). There was also differences when looking at the AVQ and AIVQ separately. Mean AVQ scores were 12.5 ± 1.8 and 13.5 ± 0.9 (p < 0.0001) and mean AIVQ scores were 12.6 ± 1.8 and 12.9 ± 1.8 (p = 0.04) for RA assessment and self-assessment, respectively. Conclusion: Our results show a statistically significant difference between RA assessment and patient self-assessment of functional status, and this difference seems to be more pronounced regarding AVQ than AIVQ. The study confirms that self-assessment of functional status by older ED patients is feasible, but further testing is required in order to confirm the validity and psychometric values of this self-administered version of the OARS.

scholarly journals Self Assessment Tools (SAT) as One of the Basic Tools for Performance Management: A Critique

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Thomas Alama Etalong
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
State Government ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
Permanent Staff

The alignment of employees to the organizational goal, vision and mission is very imperative and cannot be emphasize enough. As such, there is need for organizations to deliberately bring their workforce on board to achieve this set goals or targets. It is also important for employees to assess themselves from time to time to ascertain that they are up-to- date with the vision, goal and mission of the organization, this literally translate into self-assessment- a process of keeping self in proper check to ascertain correctness and alignment with organizational objective. The central theme of this article is to examine the role of Self-Assessment Tool (SAT) in performance management, the article also examine the shortfall of this tool developed by Bureau for Public Service Reform (BPSR). The method adopted for this study is survey method using questionnaires, one hundred questionnaires were administered among forty (40) junior, thirty (30) senior staff in the Office of the Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Enugu State, twenty (20) contract staff and ten (10) permanent staff of First Bank Plc, presidential road, Enugu. The results from the analysis shows that, the results from Self-Assessment Tool (SAT) are not made public and it gives preferences to government agencies at the detriment of private sector. The paper further X-ray the importance of performance management, ranging from reduced costs in the organization, aligns the organization directly between its employees and the strategic goals and stop project overruns. The paper concludes by noting that the result of the assessment may be made public, to guide policy making process and finally, the private sector should also be incorporated into the tool.

scholarly journals Simple Self-Assessment Tool to Predict Osteoporosis in Taiwanese Men

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dung-Huan Liu ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hsu ◽  
Pei-Ching Wu ◽  
Ying-Chou Chen ◽  
You-Yin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Taiwanese Men ◽  
Country Specific

Background: Although the self-assessment tools for predicting osteoporosis are convenient for clinicians, they are not commonly used among men. We developed the Male Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Taiwan (MOSTAi) to identify the patients at risk of osteoporosis.Methods: All the participants completed a questionnaire on the clinical risk factors for the fracture risk assessment tool. The risk index was calculated by the multivariate regression model through the item reduction method. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze its sensitivity and specificity, and MOSTAi was developed and validated.Results: A total of 2,290 men participated in the bone mineral density (BMD) survey. We chose a model that considered two variables (age and weight). The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.700. The formula for the MOSTAi index is as follows: 0.3 × (weight in kilograms) – 0.1 × (years). We chose 11 as the appropriate cut-off value for the MOSTAi index to identify the subjects at the risk of osteoporosis.Conclusions: The MOSTAi is a simple, intuitive, and country-specific tool that can predict the risk of osteoporosis in Taiwanese men. Due to different demographic characteristics, each region of the world can develop its own model to identify patients with osteoporosis more effectively.

scholarly journals A Path to Early Diagnosis of MCI and Dementia: Integrating myMemCheck Into the Primary Care Workflow

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 261-262
Author(s):  
William Mansbach ◽  
Ryan Mace ◽  
Theresa Frangiosa ◽  
Virginia Biggar ◽  
Meryl Comer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Study Results

Abstract Barriers to the early detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia can delay diagnosis and treatment. myMemCheck® was developed as a rapid free cognitive self-assessment tool that can be completed in the practice setting or at home to identify older adults that would benefit from a more comprehensive cognitive evaluation for MCI and dementia. Two prospective cross-sectional studies (N = 59; N = 357) were conducted to examine the psychometric properties and clinical utility of myMemCheck®. myMemCheck® evidenced adequate reliability (test-retest, r = 0.67) and strong construct validity (η2 = 0.29, discriminating normal, MCI, dementia). Receiver operating characteristic analysis evidenced an optional myMemCheck® cut score for identifying older adults with MCI or dementia (sensitivity = 0.80, specificity = 0.67, positive predictive value = 0.91, negative predictive value = 0.43). myMemCheck® explained 25% of cognitive status beyond basic patient information. We provide specific suggestions for integrating myMemCheck® into practice to optimize workflow. Study results are further interpreted in the context of two national online surveys (healthcare professionals, N = 181; consumers, N = 1740). Healthcare professionals widely agreed on the need (94%) and importance (86%) of cognitive self-assessments. Public demand for cognitive self-assessment was confirmed by consumers who trialed myMemCheck® as part of their survey participation—86% agreed on the need for a tool like myMemCheck®. Mixed methods findings suggest that myMemCheck® could fast- track the diagnostic process, facilitate appropriate referrals for cognitive and neuropsychological evaluation, reduce assessment burden in healthcare, and prevent negative outcomes associated with undetected cognitive impairment.

Environmental Sustainability Assessment Based on the Concept of Carbon Carrying Capacity

2013 ◽  
Vol 284-287 ◽  
pp. 1511-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeon Gho Lee ◽  
Kyuin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Sustainability Assessment ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Mixed Use ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Carbon Neutral

Most of sustainability assessment tools for urban development planning do not provide any quantitative framework in terms of measuring the conceptual idea of “Carbon-neutral”. These tools generally use the scoring methodology by sum up points in various check lists for environmental sustainability. For planners, assessment of environmental sustainability should offer a simple and quantitative framework for measuring environmental resource uses and loads in order to develop planning alternatives under the limited natural conditions. The concept of carrying capacity needs to be understood as maximum loads to a limited environment, and the balance of CO2 emissions, uptakes, and offsetting acts as the most important quantitative indicators assessing environmental sustainability in terms of the conceptual idea of “Carbon-neutral”. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate theories of the concept of “Carbon Carrying Capacity”, and to propose an assessment tool for measuring environmental sustainability based on the concept of Carbon Carrying Capacity. To present case study results, a high-density and mixed-use development project was chosen located in Kwangmyung-si near Seoul. Results indicated the baseline of Carbon Carrying Capacity was estimated at 0.48tCO2/capita•yr and possibilities of achieving environmental sustainability by the development planning alternatives.

scholarly journals How Can an AI Supported, Self-Assessment Tool Raise Standards of Digital Health Services During COVID-19 Emergency?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neja Samar Brenčič ◽  
Malcolm Fisk ◽  
Uroš Rajkovič
Keyword(s):  
Health Services ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Traditional Health ◽  
Health Products ◽  
Common Interests

It is understandable that digital health services are now being developed in the context of a global emergency. However, it is crucial that standards are in place for these services to support their operation in a way that accommodates common interests and objectives and recognises the level of their importance for all stakeholders involved (including service recipients or users). We believe that it is necessary to establish and maintain quality standards for digital health products and services in these conditions. Furthermore, even after the pandemic, the need to integrate digital health services into traditional health and social services will remain a priority. Therefore we consider whether multi-criteria, self assessment tools, supported with artificial intelligence, can raise standards of digital health services that are rapidly developing as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that such digital services are no longer just an alternative form of health care. It follows that frameworks for the development of standards, accreditation and regulation must also be included as national (or supra-national) priorities. These will help ensure not only technological but also service quality.

scholarly journals Assessing the educational impact of cognitive level of MCQ and SEQ on learning approaches of dental students

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahwish Arooj ◽  
Khadijah Mukhtar ◽  
Rehan Ahmed Khan ◽  
Tayyaba Azhar
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Educational Impact ◽  
Surface Approach ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: MCQ’s and SEQ’s are the most widely used assessment tool in dental colleges across Pakistan. This study explores the impact of assessment tool: MCQ’s and SEQ’s on learning approach of dental students and also identifies correlation between these assessment tools and deep & surface learning approaches in integrated and discipline based curriculum. Methods: A quantitative co-relational study was conducted in 2018 on 2nd and 4th year dental students. A pre-validated “Revised Study Process Questionnaire” was used. Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon signed ranks test were applied to determine the relationship between learning approaches and assessment tools. Internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach’s alpha. Results: Ninety six students out of one hundred and fifty completed the questionnaire. Correlation test showed that surface approach correlates significantly with MCQ’s (0.73) while no co-relation exists with SEQ’s (-0.14) in our study. Deep approach has a strong and significant correlation with SEQ’s (0.80) as compared to MCQ’s (0.056). Conclusion: Assessment tool has an impact on learning approaches used by the students. It was concluded that students used to prefer deep learning approach while preparing for SEQ’s as they were designed at higher cognitive level, whereas, they preferred surface approach while preparing for MCQ’s as they were developed at low cognitive order. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3475 How to cite this:Arooj M, Mukhtar K, Khan RA, Azhar T. Assessing the educational impact of cognitive level of MCQ and SEQ on learning approaches of dental students. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3475 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Promoting educational work using modern educational assessment tools: Creating and implementing rubrics for assessing projects and the cultivation of 21st-century skills

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 189-196
Author(s):  
Dionisios Kouloumpis ◽  
Theodora Papageorgiou ◽  
Κaterina Κasimatis
Keyword(s):  
21St Century ◽  
21St Century Skills ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Metacognitive Skills ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Educational Work ◽  
Project Assessment

The purpose of this study is to highlight the effectiveness of the use of rubric as a modern technique for teaching and assessing educational work. More specifically, our purpose is to explore the benefits of the implementation of the rubric for the project assessment in comparison with other traditional assessment techniques as far as the development of skills and the improvement of the educational work is concerned. The analytical rubric that was created and employed in the study included the following criteria (each with pre-determined quality levels): content completeness, structure and organisation, creativity, development of skills and cognitive concepts. This processing tool automatically quantifies the gradient of the criteria and automatically completes the final descriptive evaluation. It has a modern pedagogical scientific approach and flexibility, which gives impetus to creative projects in school. Six teachers of a Greek high school in Athens participated in the study. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview. The nature of the study was qualitative. The results revealed that the rubric can replace any other traditional technique. The tool allowed the students to evaluate their efforts, thus allowing them to realise the usefulness of the rubric as a self-assessment tool. Moreover, by using the rubric the students and the teachers had the chance to communicate constructively. The teachers and the students assessed the rubric in a positive way as the students were led to self-assessment processes through reflection and feedback and the development of cognitive and metacognitive skills. Keywords: Authentic assessment project, rubric, assessment criteria, reflection, 21st-century skills.

Exploring Genetic Literacy in a Small Hispanic Population

2020 ◽  
pp. 104365962093812
Author(s):  
Kimberly Subasic ◽  
Rebecca Kronk ◽  
Andrea Mantione ◽  
Maria Vital
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Hispanic Population ◽  
Literacy Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Genetic Literacy ◽  
Qualitative Feedback ◽  
Social Decisions ◽  
Back Translation

Introduction: Genetic literacy recognizes one’s ability to gather, understand, and apply genomic information to make informed health care choices and social decisions. A limited understanding of genomic literacy carries the potential for poor health outcomes. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the usefulness of an assessment tool to ascertain genetic literacy in a small Hispanic clinic population. Methodology: Mixed-method, cross-sectional pilot study requiring forward-back translation of an established questionnaire. Twenty Spanish-speaking adults were recruited through purposive and convenience sampling. Results: Forward–back translation provided a comparable questionnaire. Participants indicated information was relevant. Qualitative feedback uncovered regional differences. Quantitative results reported descriptive statistics, frequencies, and Cronbach alphas. Discussion: Findings from this study reveal the need for genetic literacy assessment tools that are attuned to the linguistic, ethnic, and cultural differences within the Hispanic population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document