scholarly journals Comparison of an IgG-Specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Cutoff of 0.4 Versus 0.8 and 1.0 Optical Density Units for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianne M. Ritchie ◽  
Jean M. Connors ◽  
Katelyn W. Sylvester
Keyword(s):  
Optical Density ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated optimized diagnostic accuracy in utilizing higher antiheparin–platelet factor 4 (PF4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) optical density (OD) thresholds for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We describe the incidence of positive serotonin release assay (SRA) results, as well as performance characteristics, for antiheparin–PF4 ELISA thresholds ≥0.4, ≥0.8, and ≥1.0 OD units in the diagnosis of HIT at our institution. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, we conducted a single-center retrospective chart review on adult inpatients with a differential diagnosis of HIT evaluated by both antiheparin–PF4 ELISA and SRA from 2012 to 2014. The major endpoints were to assess incidence of positive SRA results, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy at antiheparin–PF4 ELISA values ≥0.4 OD units when compared to values ≥0.8 and ≥1.0 OD units. Clinical characteristics, including demographics, laboratory values, clinical and safety outcomes, length of stay, and mortality, were collected. Results: A total of 140 patients with 140 antiheparin–PF4 ELISA and SRA values were evaluated, of which 23 patients were SRA positive (16.4%) and 117 patients were SRA negative (83.6%). We identified a sensitivity of 91.3% versus 82.6% and 73.9%, specificity of 61.5% versus 87.2% and 91.5%, PPV of 31.8% versus 55.9% and 63.0%, NPV of 97.3% versus 96.2% and 94.7%, and accuracy of 66.4% versus 86.4% and 88.6% at antiheparin–PF4 ELISA thresholds ≥0.4, ≥0.8, and ≥1.0 OD units, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests an increased antiheparin–PF4 ELISA threshold of 0.8 or 1.0 OD units enhances specificity, PPV, and accuracy while maintaining NPV with decreased sensitivity.

Utility of Optical Density Values from Heparin-Platelet Factor 4 Antibody Testing and Probability Scoring Models To Diagnose Patients with Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1475-1475
Author(s):  
Kim A. Janatpour ◽  
Robert C. Gosselin ◽  
William E. Dager ◽  
Andrew Lee ◽  
John T. Owings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Optical Density ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Test Probability ◽  
4T Score

Abstract Background: Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life threatening complication of heparin administration caused by antibodies directed to the heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex and characterized by thrombocytopenia with a seemingly paradoxical high risk of thrombosis. Diagnosis is challenging, and is based on both clinical suspicion and laboratory detection of heparin-PF4 antibodies. The Warkentin 4 T’s “pre-test” probability and Chong’s “post-test” probability models have been developed to aid the diagnosis of HIT. Enzyme-linked immunoabosorbant assay (ELISA) laboratory measurement of heparin-PF4 antibodies is commonly used but has a low positive predictive value for thrombosis. Recent reports suggest that using an ELISA optical density (OD) value of ≥ 1 may improve the predictive value for thrombosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 105 patients with suspected HIT who were treated with a direct thrombin inhibitor and evaluated the anti-heparin-PF4 ELISA OD values and Warkentin 4 T’s scores for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) using the Chong’s score to define HITBoth the manufacturer’s OD threshold of 0.4 and ≥ 1 were evaluated. Table 1. Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for 4 T’s and OD levels, alone and in combination Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) NPV (%) PPV (%) For calculations, Chong’s categories of definite/probable and unlikely were used to define presence or absence of HIT. 4T’s score (high and low) 81 100 80 100 OD level 0.4 69 75 65 78 OD level ≥1 38 85 52 77 4T’s + OD 0.4 94 100 94 100 4T’s +OD ≥1 69 85 81 75 Results: The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of ELISA alone were inferior to the 4 T’s clinical scorings system. The sensitivity and negative predictive values of the 4T’s score were improved by considering positive or negative ELISA test results. Conclusions: Consistent with previous reports, the PPV of a high probability 4T score alone was 100%. Thus, ELISA results might not change clinical decisions in this situation. Alternative anticoagulation might be inappropriately withheld in 20% of patients if a low probability 4T score alone were to be used for decision-making. The addition of ELISA data using an OD level of 0.4 increased the NPV to a threshold that might be considered clinically acceptable (94%) to withhold therapy. Addition of an OD level of ≥ 1 did not improve the PV of the 4 T’s. However, in contrast to other studies that found better predictive value to using this higher OD threshold, our study group was limited to people considered high risk for HIT. Validation of this strategy in a prospective trial with clinical endpoints should be considered.

scholarly journals Validation of the high-dose heparin confirmatory step for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 1761-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole L. Whitlatch ◽  
David F. Kong ◽  
Ara D. Metjian ◽  
Gowthami M. Arepally ◽  
Thomas L. Ortel
Keyword(s):  
Optical Density ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Abstract The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requires detection of antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Addition of excess heparin to the sample decreases the optical density by 50% or more and confirms the presence of these antibodies. One hundred fifteen patients with anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were classified as clinically HIT-positive or HIT-negative, followed by confirmation with excess heparin. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted to estimate relationships between patient characteristics, laboratory findings, and clinical HIT status. This model was validated on an independent sample of 97 patients with anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies. No relationship between age, race, or sex and clinical HIT status was found. Maximal optical density and confirmatory positive status independently predicted HIT in multivariate analysis. Predictive accuracy on the training set (c-index 0.78, Brier score 0.17) was maintained when the algorithm was applied to the independent validation population (c-index 0.80, Brier score 0.20). This study quantifies the clinical utility of the confirmatory test to diagnose HIT. On the basis of data from the heparin/PF4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and confirmatory assays, a predictive computer algorithm could distinguish patients likely to have HIT from those who do not.

Serologic Results in >1000 Patients With Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Pathogenic Antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.

scholarly journals The Clinical Utility of the Heparin Neutralization Assay in the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 749-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Zheng ◽  
Michael B. Streiff ◽  
Clifford M. Takemoto ◽  
Jennifer Bynum ◽  
Elise Gelwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Heparin Neutralization

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains diagnostically challenging. Immunoassays including PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have high sensitivity but low specificity. Whether the heparin neutralization assay (HNA) improves the diagnostic accuracy of the PF4/heparin ELISA for HIT is uncertain. In this study, to assess its clinical utility and evaluate whether it improves the diagnostic accuracy for HIT, we implemented HNA in conjunction with PF4/heparin ELISA over a 1-year period. A total of 1194 patient samples were submitted to the laboratory for testing from December 2015 to November 2016. Heparin neutralization assay alone is a poor predictor for HIT, but it has high negative predictive value (NPV): Cases with %inhibition <70% are always negative for serotonin release assay. It improves the diagnostic positive predictive value (PPV) of ELISA without compromising sensitivity: ELISA optical density (OD) ≥1.4 alone has a sensitivity of 88% (14/16) and a PPV of 61% (14/23); with HNA %inhibition ≥70%, the sensitivity remains 88% (14/16) and PPV is 82% (14/17). 4Ts score correlates with ELISA OD and predicts HIT; the predictive accuracy of 4Ts score is further improved by HNA. Interestingly, HNA %inhibition of <70% correlates with low 4Ts scores. Based on its high NPV, HNA has the potential to facilitate more timely and accurate HIT diagnosis.

scholarly journals Detection of Platelet-Activating Antibodies Associated with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Tardy ◽  
Thomas Lecompte ◽  
François Mullier ◽  
Caroline Vayne ◽  
Claire Pouplard
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Membrane Expression ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Functional Assays ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic immune drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies that in most instances recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes. Platelet activation assays (i.e., functional assays) are more specific than immunoassays, since they are able to discern clinically relevant heparin-induced antibodies. All functional assays used for HIT diagnosis share the same principle, as they assess the ability of serum/plasma from suspected HIT patients to activate fresh platelets from healthy donors in the presence of several concentrations of heparin. Depending on the assay, donors’ platelets are stimulated either in whole blood (WB), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or in a buffer medium (washed platelets, WP). In addition, the activation endpoint studied varies from one assay to another: platelet aggregation, membrane expression of markers of platelet activation, release of platelet granules. Tests with WP are more sensitive and serotonin release assay (SRA) is considered to be the current gold standard, but functional assays suffer from certain limitations regarding their sensitivity, specificity, complexity, and/or accessibility. However, the strict adherence to adequate preanalytical conditions, the use of selected platelet donors and the inclusion of positive and negative controls in each run are key points that ensure their performances.

Correlation Of Heparin Confirmatory Test (HCT) With Optical Density (OD) and Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) In The Diagnosis Of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4754-4754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravneet Thind ◽  
Danielle Heidemann ◽  
Sundara Raman ◽  
Philip Kuriakose
Keyword(s):  
Optical Density ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Laboratory Confirmation ◽  
Confirmation Test ◽  
Release Assay

Introduction Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially fatal, thrombotic complication of heparin therapy mediated by antibodies to complexes between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Accurate and rapid diagnosis with prompt commencement of therapy are imperative as delays in treatment are associated with an increasing risk of thrombosis, amputation, or death. On the flip side, initiation of therapy with direct thrombin inhibitors without laboratory confirmation carries a significant risk of bleeding. Two types of laboratory tests are available for detection of these antibodies: a widely available immunoassay (ELISA), which is very sensitive to the presence of anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies, but is less specific to the clinical syndrome of HIT because of detection of non-pathological antibodies. The Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) is a functional assay that is now considered the gold standard for confirmatory diagnosis of HIT due to its high specificity. However, the downside of SRA is the cost involved, limited availability and a turnaround time of 5-7 days. As such, a heparin confirmatory test (HCT) with excess heparin has been in use since mid 2011 on positive ELISA samples in our laboratory to improve test specificity. This test is more cost and time efficient, with a turnover time of no more than 48 hours. As noted in prior studies, inhibition of a positive ELISA result by 50% or more in the presence of excess heparin is considered confirmatory of heparin-dependent antibodies. Likewise a negative confirmatory test is defined as a decrease of 50% or less in antibody binding in the presence of heparin. Aim a) Correlation of Heparin Confirmatory test (HCT) with strength of HIT ELISA, vis-à-vis optical density (OD) of 0.4 - 0.99 and OD of >/= 1.0. b) Correlation of HCT results with SRA, to see if the latter can be replaced by the heparin confirmatory test. Patients and Methods A retrospective chart review of adult patients hospitalized at our institution with suspected HIT from July 2011 until January 2013 was done. There were 101 such patients. All patients who had a positive HIT ELISA, then had HCT as per our standard lab practice, with an SRA test done for diagnosis/confirmation of HIT, as per standard clinical practice. Historically, the major strength of SRA assay is its specificity. The optical density on HIT ELISA and SRA results were then compared with the Heparin Confirmatory test to establish clinical significance. Results Of the 101 patients tested for HIT ELISA, 49 were positive. HCT and SRA were performed on all 49 samples, 1 out of which was reported as indeterminate. Hence 48 samples were used for primary analysis, comparing HCT to the OD as well as the SRA results. Out of 48 patients, 6 had positive SRA with Heparin inhibition of >50% (sensitivity 6/6 = 100%). Remaining 42 patients had negative SRA, 7 out of which had Heparin inhibition of <50% (specificity 7/42 = 16.6%). All 7 patients with a negative HCT had a negative SRA, making the negative predictive value of the HCT 100%; however positive predictive value was only 14.6% (6/41). There was no correlation between the OD and Heparin Confirmation test. Conclusions Although there is data suggesting that there might be some value to the Heparin Confirmation test, we were unable to show a significant correlation between HCT and OD or between HCT and SRA. The prospect of having a cost effective and rapid assay for laboratory confirmation of HIT will always be a relevant need. We feel that a larger, prospective study should be conducted to definitively assess the relationship between HCT and SRA. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Mesenteric and coeliac occlusions following heparininduced thrombocytopenia after aortobiprofunda bypass surgery

2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. e15-e17
Author(s):  
Ewan Bigsby ◽  
Arindam Chaudhuri ◽  
Alastair Whiteway
Keyword(s):  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Total Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Short Distance ◽  
Bypass Surgery ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Bowel Ischaemia ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

A 56-year-old man developed mid-gut bowel ischaemia following an elective aortobiprofunda bypass for short-distance claudication. The bowel was resected and he was commenced on lifelong total parenteral nutrition. He was found to have developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, confirmed by high levels of heparin-platelet factor 4-antibody on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). He subsequently had foregut ischaemia with a second bout of thrombocytopenia despite not being on heparin. The case describes the first report of bowel ischaemia as a consequence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia causing sequential superior mesenteric and coeliac arterial thrombosis in this scenario and highlights the importance of the awareness of the association of these pathological entities and subsequent management.

Prevalence and Overtesting of True Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a 591-Bed Tertiary Care, Teaching Hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 464-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Farley ◽  
Caitlyn Cummings ◽  
William Heuser ◽  
Shan Wang ◽  
Rose Calixte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Elisa Test ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Hospital Stays

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT) is a rare but potentially fatal antibody-mediated reaction to all forms of heparin (unfractionated heparin, low-molecular weight heparin, heparin flushes, and heparin-coated catheters), which can lead to HIT with thrombosis. Two tests commonly used to screen for HIT include the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serotonin release assay (SRA). This is a retrospective chart review study conducted from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2014, to estimate the rate of true HIT in critical care patients at Winthrop-University Hospital, located in Mineola, New York. Patients are classified as positive for HIT if both ELISA and SRA immunoassays are positive. We reviewed 507 heparin immunoassays, excluding 64 who had an inappropriate ELISA test sent due to no administration of heparin, enoxaparin, or heparin lock flush at this or previous hospital stays at Winthrop. Of the 443 heparin immunoassays, ELISA results were positive for 66 patients (15.1%), and only 11 (2.5%) patients had true cases of HIT with a 95% confidence interval of 1.3% to 4.4%. The 4T score for those with true HIT (median: 5.0) was statistically higher compared to those without true HIT (median: 2.0; P < .001). Despite guidelines in place, overtesting for HIT is still a prevalent issue.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document