Punching shear behaviour of geopolymer concrete two-way slabs reinforced by FRP bars under monotonic and cyclic loadings

2022 ◽  
pp. 136943322110523
Author(s):  
Sarwar Hasan Mohmmad ◽  
Mehmet Eren Gülşan ◽  
Abdulkadir Çevik
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Concrete Strength ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Punching Shear ◽  
Shear Behaviour ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Steel Bars ◽  
Frp Bars

This study examines the punching shear and deflection performance of 16 Geopolymer concrete (GC) two-way slabs subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading by considering the reinforcement material, percentage of reinforcement, type of concrete and the concrete grade. The tested specimens indicated that the crack patterns at the failure and failure modes were almost similar regardless of the type of reinforcement or their ratio. Moreover, the slabs reinforced by fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars exhibited a lower punching capacity than those strengthened by steel bars, even for similar reinforcement ratios. In addition, the results showed that upon increasing the concrete strength and reinforcement ratio, a higher punching shear capacity and lower deflections were obtained under cyclic and monotonic loading. In addition, the punching shear performance of GC slabs was found to be better than that of ordinary concrete (OC), even though both were reinforced by the basalt FRP (BFRP) bar. However, the ultimate load capacity of the slabs was reduced as a result of cyclic loading according to the capacity of the same specimen, resulting from static loading. However, the reduction is very low for slabs reinforced with FRP slabs. Further, the slabs reinforced by FRP had a better fatigue performance compared with slabs reinforced by steel bars with respect to cyclic loading. The results of the tests were also used to evaluate the accuracy of the available punching shear capacity equations.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF IMPACT LOAD ON THE PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE SLABS REINFORCED BY CFRP BARS

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (01) ◽  
pp. 68-79
Author(s):  
Hind T. Khamies ◽  
◽  
Mu’taz K. Medhlom ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Impact Load ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Slab Thickness ◽  
Empirical Formulas ◽  
Steel Bars ◽  
Rc Slabs ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Frp Bars

Using FRP bars in the concrete structures under harsh environment produces extension of those service life and dropping of the cost of their lifecycle. This study investigated the influence of slab thickness, material of rebar, arrangement of reinforcement and mass’s dropped on the dynamic behavior of RC slabs by using laboratory experiments. Seven specimens 1550×1550 mm dimension with two thickness 120 and 150mm, single control specimen reinforced with steel bars and six specimens reinforced by CFRP bars were experimentally investigated under sequential dropping-weight ranged from 50 to 150kg, it was a rigid steel projectile, used to apply impacting load. 2.5m was the height of dropping. For estimated penetration depth, three empirical formulas have been used, ACE formulae was preferable predictor than other formulas. Different codes were used to calculation punching shear capacity and critical velocity of perforation and compared the experimental results with these codes. The experimental results showed that the shear properties of slabs have a significant effect in their general behavior. And preferable performance in FRP slabs than slabs reinforced with steel can be achieved which considering high strength and corrosion resistance of this material, which makes it a suitable choice for reinforcing materials.

scholarly journals An Analytical and Numerical Investigation on Punching Shear Behaviour of SCC Slab

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Kavinkumar ◽  
R. Elangovan
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Shear Failure ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Punching Shear ◽  
Shear Behaviour ◽  
Slab Thickness ◽  
Failure Zone ◽  
Self Compacting Concrete ◽  
Concentrated Load ◽  
Different Thickness

<div><p><em>This research is to study the mechanical properties of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) as well as punching shear failure of SCC slabs. Self compacting concrete was first invited in 1988 to achieve durable concrete structures .Design of Reinforced concrete slab is often compromised by their ability to resist shear stress at punching shear surface area. The connection between slabs and supporting columns could be susceptible to high shear stress and might cause sudden and brittle failure. Punching shear failure takes the form of truncated pyramid shape. This program includes investigating the effect of SCC, slab thickness on the punching shear behaviour in terms of load-deflection response and ultimate failure load, failure characteristic of punching shear failure (shape of failure zone and size of failure zone) of simply supported slabs of 1000 x 1000 x 50 and 75mm under concentrated load at centre of slab. The slabs are made with both SCC and Conventional concrete (CC). Investigation included two way specimens with different thickness to evaluate the performance of specimen with different thickness and the effect of thickness on punching shear capacity and performance</em>.</p></div>

Punching shear behaviour of flat slabs with different reinforcement schemes: openings and rectangularity effects

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donia Salman ◽  
Rabab Allouzi ◽  
Nasim Shatarat
Keyword(s):  
Structural Engineering ◽  
Experimental Tests ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Punching Shear ◽  
Shear Behaviour ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flat Slabs ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Slabs ◽  
Rectangular Columns

PurposeThe main goal is to investigate the effect of size and location of opening and column size on the punching shear strength. Openings are often needed in order to install mechanical and electrical services. This process takes away part of the concrete volume which is responsible for resisting the shear forces and any unbalanced moment. Furthermore, the application of rectangular columns in flat slabs is commonly used in practice as they provide lateral stiffness to the building. They are also utilised in garages and multi-storey buildings where these elongated cross-sectional columns reduce the effective span length between adjacent columns.Design/methodology/approachThis research is a numerical-based investigation that is calibrated based on a thirteen previously tested and numerically calibrated slab specimens with no openings. A parametric study is conducted in this study to consider the effect of other parameters, which are the size and location of opening and the rectangularity ratio of column in order to evaluate their effect on the punching shear capacity. A total of 156 models are developed to study these factors. Additionally, the predicted shear carrying capacity of the simulated slabs is calculated using the ACI318–19 and Eurocode (EC2-04) equation.FindingsThe presence of openings reduced the punching shear capacity. The small opening's location and orientation have almost no effect except for one slab. For slabs of large openings, the presence of openings reduced the punching capacity. The punching capacity is higher when the openings are farther from the column. The numerically obtained results of slabs with rectangular columns show lower punching capacity compared to slabs of squared columns with the same length of the punching shear control perimeter. The punching capacity for all slabs is predicted by ACI318–19 and Eurocode (EC2-04) and it is found that Eurocode (EC2-04) provided a closer estimation.Originality/valueThe slabs considered for calibration were reinforced with four different punching shear reinforcement configurations, namely; ordinary closed rectangular stirrups, rectangular spiral stirrups, advanced rectangular spiral stirrups and circular spiral. Generally, there has been limited research on concrete flat slabs with openings in comparison with other subjects related to structural engineering (Guan, 2009) and no research on punching shear with openings of slabs reinforced with these reinforcement schemes. The available research focussed on the effects of openings on the flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete slabs includes Casadei et al. (2003), Banu et al. (2012) and Elsayed et al. (2009). In addition, experimental tests that examined slabs supported on rectangular columns are very limited.

Study on Shear Behaviour of Concrete Beams Prestressed with External CFRP Tendons

2013 ◽  
Vol 275-277 ◽  
pp. 1167-1171
Author(s):  
Xin Ding Wang ◽  
Hang Dai ◽  
Yong Chao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Shear Failure ◽  
Concrete Beams ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Beams ◽  
Shear Behaviour ◽  
Similar Process ◽  
Shear Span ◽  
External Tendons ◽  
Straight Line ◽  
Steel Bars

Based on independent research and development of a CFRP tendons wedge-type anchorage, the shear tests of six CFRP external prestressing concrete beams were done. Among them, CFRP external tendons of three pieces were installed in straight line while other pieces were installed in curved line. The results of experimental research show that shear behaviour of concrete beams prestressed with CFRP external tendons are the similar process to the traditional prestressed reinforced concrete beams. They go through the elastic stage, the stage of crack extension, the yield stage of internal hoop reinforcements at the intersection of inclined cracks and the failure stage. When external CFRP tendons are arranged in the same situation, the cracking load and the shear capacity of concrete beams prestressed with CFRP external tendons reduce gradually along with the increase of shear-span ratio,.When shear-span ratio is equal, the cracking load and the shear capacity of concrete beams prestressed with curved arrangement of CFRP external tendons are larger than those of concrete beams prestressed with straight arrangement of CFRP external tendons. Compared with traditional concrete beams prestressed with external steel bars, due to elasticity modulus and shear modulus of CFRP tendons are both smaller than those of steel bars, the mid-span deflection of concrete beams prestressed with CFRP external tendons at the time of shear failure is bigger than that of traditional concrete beams prestressed with external steel bars under the same circumstance.

scholarly journals PERILAKU PUNCHING SHEAR PADA HUBUNGAN KOLOM BULAT DENGAN FLAT SLAB AKIBAT BEBAN TEKAN AKSIAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zardi
Keyword(s):  
Concrete Strength ◽  
Load Condition ◽  
Maximum Load ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Punching Shear ◽  
Shear Reinforcement ◽  
Eccentric Load ◽  
Flat Slab ◽  
Circular Column ◽  
Flat Slabs

The aim of the tests was to investigate the influence of concrete strength, the eccentricity of the column and the use of shear reinforcement in flat slabs on punching shear. The research specimens are 8 units of flat slabs. Flat slab size 1400 x 1400 mm2 with thickness of 120 mm. Flat slabs were connected with circular column with dimension 225 mm  of diameter and 200 mm of height. Flat slabs were made in to 2 variations of concrete strength, e.i. 30 MPa and 60 MPa, 2 variations of shear reinforcement, e.i. without shear reinforcement and with shear reinforcement and 2 variations of eccentricity that, e.i. without eccentricity and with eccentricity. Each treatment has 1 specimen. Each specimen has 6 cylinder specimens. Cylinder specimens used as a concrete strength control for main specimen (flat slab). The tests showed that the concrete strength had a strong influence on punching shear strength. This is shown by capacity increase of 42.78%; 54.00%; 46.59% and 0.02%. The value is ratio between the maximum load of the specimens with 60 MPa and 30 MPa at the same eccentricity and the same shear reinforcement. The eccentricity of column reduce the capacity of punching shear. This is shown by 3 specimens decrease in capacity of 3.70%; 36.75% and 7.30%. Only 1 specimen that increase in capacity of 9.27%. The value is ratio between the maximum load of the specimens with 40 mm eccentricity and 0 mm eccentricity at the same compressive strenght and the same shear reinforcement. The use of shear reinforcement does not always increase the punching shear capacity. There are 2 observations that increased capacity (52.07% and 65.37% at the centric load) and 2 observations decreased capacity (0.12% and 4.92% at the eccentric load). The value is ratio between the maximum load on the specimens using shear reinforcement with the specimens that do not use shear reinforcement at the same compressive strenght and the same eccentricity.The use of shear reinforcement increase punching shear capacity of flat slab at the centric load condition. The use of shear reinforcement decrease punching shear capacity of flat slab at the eccentric load condition.

scholarly journals The Attitude of Load-Deflection for Concrete Beams with Polymer Reinforcement

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
Ahmed Saadon ◽  
Abdulnasser Abbas ◽  
Ali Khalaf
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Experimental Test ◽  
Ultimate Load ◽  
Concrete Beams ◽  
Concrete Strength ◽  
Control Beam ◽  
Steel Bars ◽  
Conservative Values ◽  
Frp Bars

In this research, the load-deflection behavior is explored for concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars (polymer reinforcement). An experimental test is done for a total of five beams subjected to 4-point loading. The tested specimens are of dimensions; 2100 mm (length), 200 mm (width) and 300 mm (depth), while the used compressive strength for concrete is f’c = 60 MPa. Four beams were longitudinally reinforced by various CFRP rebar numbers, and the last beam was reinforced only by steel bars as control beam. Relationships for load-deflection were drawn and the influence of several factors was debated on this relationship. It was exhibited that the failure of FRP reinforced samples was generally ruled by the concrete strength. When the ratio of reinforcement rising by 50%, 100% and 150%, the ultimate load increased by 15%, 29% and 38%, respectively, while the recorded deflection at ultimate load decreased by 7%, 16% and 24%, respectively. For the ultimate load of the studied beams, outcomes exhibited that the equations of the American code ACI 440.1R give very close values with the test values, while they give very conservative values to the deflection at ultimate load which are smaller than the test values by about (37%-45%)

scholarly journals Shear Cap Size Selection Method Based on Parametric Analysis of ACI-318 Code and Eurocode 2 Standard

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 4938
Author(s):  
Maciej Grabski ◽  
Andrzej Ambroziak
Keyword(s):  
Parametric Analysis ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Selection Method ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Punching Shear ◽  
Transverse Reinforcement ◽  
Shear Load ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Structure ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Eurocode 2

The scope of the paper is to propose a method for determining the size of shear caps in a slab–column-connections-reinforced concrete structure. Usually, shear heads are used to enhance slab–column connection, especially when the transverse reinforcement does not give the required punching shear load capacity. The dimensions of the shear head should provide the punching shear resistance of the connection inside and outside the enhanced region. The process of selecting the size of the shear head is iterative. The parametric analysis of the ACI 318 code and EC2 standard has the objective of indicating which control perimeter (inside or outside the shear head) has a decisive impact on the punching shear capacity of the connection. Based on the analysis, the authors propose methods for selecting the dimensions of the shear head with practical application examples. The paper is intended to provide scientists, civil engineers, and designers with guidelines to design the process of the slab–column connections with the shear caps.

Tests of Slab-Column Connections Subjected to Reversed Cyclic Moments in Addition to Different Levels of Gravity Shear Load

2019 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 146-152
Author(s):  
Amr Abdelkhalik ◽  
Tamer Elafandy ◽  
Amr Abdelrahman ◽  
Alaa Sherif
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Shear Failure ◽  
Punching Shear ◽  
Shear Behaviour ◽  
Slab Thickness ◽  
Shear Reinforcement ◽  
Gravity Load ◽  
Rc Slab ◽  
Vertical Gravity ◽  
Punching Failure

Reinforced concrete flat slab-column structures are widely used because of their practicality. However, this type of structures can be subjected to punching-shear failure within the slab-column connections. Without shear reinforcement, the slab-column connection can undergo brittle punching failure, especially when the structure is subjected to lateral loading in seismic zones. This research is a part of an extensive investigation about the punching shear behaviour of interior RC slab-column connections under seismic loading. The main objective is to discuss the effect of the gravity shear level on the punching shear behaviour[1].The current paper represents only the results of the first four tested specimens without shear reinforcement. The first specimen was tested subjected to vertical gravity load only without cyclic loading while the other three specimens were tested under different vertical loads V which was kept constant during testing in addition to a reversed displacement controlled cyclic loading which was increased up to punching shear failure. The gravity load V was chosen as 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 V0 respectively, where V0 is the vertical load causing punching shear failure according to ACI318-14[2]. All tested specimens have the same slab dimensions of 2000x2000mm, slab thickness 200mm, flexural reinforcement ratio of 1.62% and the same column dimensions 250mm x 250mm. Finally, the experimental results are analyzed and compared to international codes such as American Code ACI318-14 and Euro Code EC2-2004[3]. In light of these results, some preliminary conclusions are presented.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Flexural Performance and Behaviour of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Beams Reinforced with CFRP and GFRP Bars

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Hemn Qader Ahmed ◽  
Dilshad Kakasor Jaf ◽  
Sinan Abdulkhaleq Yaseen
Keyword(s):  
Crack Width ◽  
Ultimate Load ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Reinforcement Ratio ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Ultimate Load Capacity ◽  
Gfrp Bars ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Fibre Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Frp Bars

A construction system with high sustainability, high durability, and appropriate strength can be supplied by geopolymer concrete (GPC) reinforced with glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) bars. Few studies deal with a combination of GPC and FRP bars, especially CFRP bars. The present investigation presents the flexural capacity and behaviour of fly-ash-based GPC beam reinforced with two different types of FRP bars: six reinforced geopolymer concrete (RGPC) beams consisting of three specimens reinforced with GFRP bars and the rest with CFRP bars. The beams were tested under four-point bending with a clear span of 2000 mm. The test parameters included the longitudinal-reinforcement ratio and the longitudinal-reinforcement type, including GFRP and CFRP. Ultimate load, first crack load, load-deflection behaviour, load-strain curve, crack width, and the modes of failure were studied. The experimental results were compared with the equations recommended by ACI 440.1R-15 and CSA S806-12 for flexural strength and midspan deflection of the beams. The results show that the reinforcement ratio had a significant effect on the ultimate load capacity and failure mode. The ultimate load capacity of CFRP-RGPC beams was higher than that of GFRP-RGPC, more crack formations were observed in the CFRP-RGPC beams than in the GFRP-RGPC beams, and the crack width in the GFRP-RGPC beams was more extensive than that in the CFRP-RGPC beams. Beams with lower reinforcement ratios experienced a fewer number of crack and a higher value of crack width, while numerous cracks and less value of crack width were observed in beams with higher reinforcement ratio. Beams with the lower reinforcement ratios were more affected by the type of FRP bars, and the deflection in GFRP-RGPC beams was higher than that in CFRP-RGPC beams for the same corresponding load level. ACI 440.1R-15 and CSA S806-12 underestimated the flexural strength and midspan deflection of RGPC beams; however, CSA S806-12 predicted more accurately.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document