Improved risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes using a combination of hsTnT, NT-proBNP and hsCRP with the GRACE score

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Klingenberg ◽  
Soheila Aghlmandi ◽  
Lorenz Räber ◽  
Baris Gencer ◽  
David Nanchen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Improve Risk Stratification ◽  
St Segment ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Grace Score

Background: Clinical scores and biomarkers improve risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, little is known about their value in patients referred for coronary angiography. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted at four Swiss university hospitals with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome were enrolled into the SPUM-ACS Biomarker Cohort between 2009 and 2012. Patients were followed at 30 days and 1 year with assessment of adjudicated events including all-cause mortality and the composite of all-cause mortality or non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction. Results: Events and biomarkers were analysed in 1892 patients (52.4% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 43.3% with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 4.3% with unstable angina). Death at 30 days occurred in 35 patients (1.9%) and at 1 year in 80 patients (4.3%). The choice of troponin assay (conventional versus high sensitivity) to calculate the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score did not affect risk prediction. The prognostic accuracy of the GRACE score was improved when combined with three individual biomarkers including high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) to yield a 9% increment (C-statistic 0.73–>0.82) for the discrimination of short-term risk for all-cause mortality. In contrast, the novel biomarkers placental growth factor (PlGF), soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and the ratio sFlt-1/PlGF did not improve risk stratification. Conclusions: In patients with acute coronary syndrome referred for coronary angiography, combinations of biomarkers including hsTnT, NT-proBNP and hsCRP with the GRACE score enhanced risk discrimination. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01000701

Outcomes of nonagenarians with acute coronary syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Echarte Morales ◽  
P.L Cepas Guillen ◽  
G Caldentey ◽  
E Martinez Gomez ◽  
J Borrego-Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Baseline Characteristic ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
St Segment ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Myocardial infarction (MI) in nonagenarians is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, this population has typically been underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of nonagenarian patients presenting with MI who underwent either conservative or invasive management. Methods We retrospectively included all consecutive patients equal to or older than 90yo admitted with non-ST segment elevation (NSTEMI) or ST segment elevation MI (STEMI) in four tertiary care centers between 2005 and 2018. Patients with type 2 myocardial infarction were excluded. We collected patients' baseline characteristic and procedural data. In-hospital and at 1-year follow-up all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events were assessed. Results 523 patients (mean age 92.6±2 years; 60% females) were analyzed. Overall, 184 patients (35.2%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), increasing over the years, mostly in STEMI group (from 16% of patients in 2005 to 75% in 2018). PCI was preferred in those subjects with less prevalence of disability for activities of daily living (p<0.01). The use of a radial access (76.6%) and bare metal stents (52.7%) was predominant. No significant differences were found in the incidence of major bleeding events or MI-related mechanical complications between both strategies. During index hospitalization, 99 (18.9%) patients died. Whereas no differences were found in the NSTEMI group (p=0.61), a significant lower in-hospital mortality was observed in STEMI group treated with PCI (p<0.01). At one-year follow up, 203 (38.8%) patients died, most of them due to a cardiovascular cause (60.6%). PCI was related to a lower all-cause mortality in either NSTEMI (p<0.01) or STEMI groups (p<0.01) however, lower cardiovascular mortality was only found in STEMI group (p=0.03). Conclusion An invasive approach was performed in over a third of nonagenarian patients, carrying prognostic implications and with a few numbers of complications. PCI seems to be the preferred strategy for STEMI in this high-risk population in spite of age. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Unstable Angina and Other Acute Coronary Syndromes

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Scott Wright ◽  
Joseph G Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Unstable Angina ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cardiac Biomarkers ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) present clinically when their disease enters an unstable phase known as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), in which the cap of a previously stable atheromatous coronary plaque ruptures or erodes, which in turn activates a thrombotic cascade that may lead to coronary artery occlusion, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, and patient death. There are nearly 2 million episodes of ACS in the United States annually; it is the most common reason for hospitalization with CAD and is the leading cause of death in the developed world. ACS patients include those with unstable angina (UA), non–ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), and ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and patients who die suddenly of an arrhythmia precipitated by coronary occlusion. The distinction among various ACS subgroups reflects varying characteristics of clinical presentation (presence or absence of elevated cardiac biomarkers) and the type of electrocardiographic (ECG) changes manifested on the initial ECG at the time of hospitalization. This chapter focuses on UA and non-STEMI. A graph outlines mortality risks faced by patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. An algorithm describes the suggested management of patients admitted with UA or non-STEMI. Tables describe the risk stratification of the patient with chest pain, categories of Killip class, examination findings of a patient with high-risk ACS, diagnosis of MI, causes of troponin elevation other than ischemic heart disease, initial risk stratification of ACS patients, and long-term medical therapies and goals in ACS patients. This review contains 2 highly rendered figures, 11 tables, and 76 references.

scholarly journals Long-term risk of death and recurrent cardiovascular events following acute coronary syndromes

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254008
Author(s):  
Pishoy Gouda ◽  
Anamaria Savu ◽  
Kevin R. Bainey ◽  
Padma Kaul ◽  
Robert C. Welsh
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Residual Risk ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Coronary Syndromes

Estimates of the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events (residual risk) among patients with acute coronary syndromes have largely been based on clinical trial populations. Our objective was to estimate the residual risk associated with common comorbidities in a large, unselected, population-based cohort of acute coronary syndrome patients. 31,056 ACS patients (49.5%—non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI], 34.0%—ST segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and 16.5%—unstable angina [UA]) hospitalised in Alberta between April 2010 and March 2016 were included. The primary composite outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including: death, stroke or recurrent myocardial infarction. The secondary outcome was death from any cause. Cox-proportional hazard models were used to identify the impact of ACS type and commonly observed comorbidities (heart failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, renal disease, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes). At 3.0 +/- 3.7 years, rates of MACE were highest in the NSTEMI population followed by STEMI and UA (3.58, 2.41 and 1.68 per 10,000 person years respectively). Mortality was also highest in the NSTEMI population followed by STEMI and UA (2.23, 1.38 and 0.95 per 10,000 person years respectively). Increased burden of comorbidities was associated with an increased risk of MACE, most prominently seen with heart failure (adjusted HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.73–1.93), renal disease (adjusted HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.40–1.65) and diabetes (adjusted HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.44–1.59). The cumulative presence of each of examined comorbidities was associated with an incremental increase in the rate of MACE ranging from 1.7 to 9.98 per 10,000 person years. Rates of secondary prevention medications at discharge were high including: statin (89.5%), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (84.1%) and beta-blockers (85.9%). Residual cardiovascular risk following an acute coronary syndrome remains high despite advances in secondary prevention. A higher burden of comorbidities is associated with increased residual risk that may benefit from aggressive or novel therapies.

scholarly journals High-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations at presentation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Wereski ◽  
K.K Lee ◽  
S Smith ◽  
A.R Chapman ◽  
D Lowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Background The widespread adoption of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing has encouraged the use of pathways to accelerate the rule-out and rule-in myocardial infarction in the Emergency Department. These pathways are not recommended for patients with ST-segment elevation, but there is a risk they may be applied incorrectly given that interpretation of the electrocardiogram is subjective, dependent on experience, and signs may be masked in those with posterior myocardial infarction. Methods Consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome were enrolled in a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial across ten hospitals in Scotland. The index diagnosis was adjudicated two clinicians independently in all patients with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations above the sex-specific 99th centile on serial testing and abnormalities on the electrocardiogram recorded. The proportion of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and concentrations below the rule-out threshold (<5 ng/L), 99th centile (<16 ng/L and <34 ng/L for women and men) and rule-in threshold (<52 ng/L) at presentation were determined. Results In total 48,282 patients were recruited between June 2013, and March 2016 of which 22% (10,360/48,282) had peak cardiac troponin concentrations above the 99th centile. The adjudicated diagnosis was type 1 myocardial infarction in 55% (4,981/9,115) of patients and 10% (925/9,115) had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (age 65 [14] years, 68% men). The majority presented within 6 hours of symptom onset (67%, 619/925), and 84% (772/925) had cardiac troponin concentrations above the 99th centile at presentation. However, troponin concentrations were below the rule-out threshold in 2% (20/925) and the rule-in threshold in 26% (240/925) of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Discussion In patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who have a final diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations are below the rule-out and rule-in threshold at presentation in 1 in 50 and 1 in 4 patients, respectively. Clinicians should not rely on cardiac troponin concentrations to guide initial treatment decisions in patients with possible ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation

VALUE OF SERUM IMA (ISCHEMIA MODIFIED ALBUMIN) IN DIAGNOSIS OF NON-ST SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES

2017 ◽  
pp. 197-202
Author(s):  
Quang Tuan Pham ◽  
Ta Dong Nguyen ◽  
Nguyen Tuong Van Ha ◽  
Van Minh Huynh
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Early diagnosis in ACS is significant to treatment and prognosis. It helps to reduce death and complications. What is the value of IMA concentration for diagnosing non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Objective: Studying the IMA concentration in blood serum in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes; determining sensitivity, specificity and cut off point of IMA in diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Subject and Method: 75 patients hospitalized in Hue Central Hospital with breast pang, presenting non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Based-on the ESC Guidelines 2015, diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes is made on 37 of those as in a patients group; 38 others are chosen as a controls group. Cross-sectional study with comparison is applied. Result: (i) Concentration of enzymes CK-MB and of hs-TnT in the patients group is higher compared with that in the controls group. Average IMA concentration in patients group is 93.49± 89.56 IU/mL (median: 58.57IU/mL) and higher compared with the controls group which reaches 15.01 ± 9.87 IU/mL (median: 11.735IU/mL). It results in a statistical significance p<0,001. (ii) The cut off point for diagnosing non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes > 28.68IU/mL, reaching a sensitivity at 91.9% and a specificity at 86.8%, AUC = 0.98, 95% CI=0.95-1.00, p<0.001, OR= 74.8, 95% CI =16.54 - 338.38, p<0.001. Conclusion: IMA has high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Key words: iMA, NSTEMi, Acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation

scholarly journals Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predictor of in-hospital mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-82
Author(s):  
Rodry Mikhael ◽  
Evan Hindoro ◽  
Sharleen Taner ◽  
Antonia Anna Lukito
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
All Cause Mortality

BACKGROUND ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most life-threatening condition of acute coronary syndrome that carries a poor prognosis of in-hospital mortality. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to predict in-hospital mortality and other cardiovascular events. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is hardly used as a predictor of in-hospital mortality. This study was aimed to determine the predictive value of NLR concerning in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients. METHODS Literature search and pooled analysis related to studies on MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Science Direct, Cochrane, and ProQuest were retrieved. Inclusion criteria were met if they were cohort studies, the subjects were STEMI patient, contained pretreatment NLR cut-off, and considered in-hospital mortality, which is defined as cardiac or all-cause mortality. Quality assessment was conducted using Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Review Manager version 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen) was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS We found 12 studies with a total of 7,251 STEMI subjects with median NLR cut-off value of 5.6. Elevated NLR on admission carries a high risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.46–3.67). A slightly higher risk of all-cause mortality (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.99–3.77) was observed compared with cardiac-related mortality (OR = 3.20, 95% CI = 2.47–4.14). No significant heterogeneity was observed between these studies (p = 0.46, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS Elevated NLR predicts a higher in-hospital mortality rate of STEMI patients.

scholarly journals Complete versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Sakurai
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Revascularisation ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background The clinical benefit of complete or culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) still remains controversial. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of complete or culprit-only PCI in patients with unstable angina and/or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Methods PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were queried to conduct a meta-analysis. The same terms or relevant studies were also queried on the website of the U.S. National Institute of Health and relevant reviews. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularisation) during follow-up period, and the secondary endpoints were the incidences of each component of MACE. When multiple follow-up results were reported in the same study, the latest results were abstracted. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Results Nine studies (60345 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The risk of all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64–0.98, p=0.03) or coronary revascularisation (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50–1.00, p=0.05) were lower in the complete PCI group than in the culprit-only PCI group, whereas the risk of MACE (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.65–1.49, p=0.94) or myocardial infarction (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.54–1.08, p=0.13) was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, complete PCI is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality or coronary revascularisation, and a similar risk of MACE or myocardial infarction compared with culprit-only PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Prognostic and reclassification value of serum cathepsin S over the GRACE risk score in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Sopova ◽  
G Georgiopoulos ◽  
M Mueller-Hennessen ◽  
M Sachse ◽  
N Vlachogiannis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cathepsin S ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Grace Score

Abstract Background Cathepsin S is an extracellular matrix degradation enzyme that plays an important role in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease by inducing vasa vasorum development and atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Purpose To determine the prognostic and reclassification value of baseline serum cathepsin S after adjustment for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, which is a clinical guideline recommended risk score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Methods Serum cathepsin S was measured by ELISA in 1,129 consecutive patients presenting with acute symptoms to the emergency department for whom a final adjudicated diagnosis of NSTE-ACS was made. All-cause mortality or all-cause death/non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) after a median follow-up of 21 months were evaluated as the primary or secondary study endpoint, respectively. The Net Reclassification Index (NRI) estimated the reclassification predictive value for risk of each end-point of cathepsin S over the GRACE score. Results After a median follow-up of 21 months 101 (8.95%) deaths were reported. The combined endpoint of death or non-fatal MI occurred in 176 (15.6%) patients. Dose-response curve analysis adjusted for the effect of age, gender, diabetes mellitus, high-sensitivity-cardiac troponin T, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, revascularization and index diagnosis revealed a non-linear association of continuous cathepsin S with all-cause death (P=0.036 for non-linearity; adjusted HR=1.60 for 80th vs. 20th percentiles, P=0.038) or with the combined endpoint (P=0.008 for non-linearity, adjusted HR=1.53 for 80th vs. 20th percentiles, P=0.011). Serum cathepsin S maintained its predictive value for all-cause death (adjusted HR=1.70 highest vs. lowest tertile, 95% CI 1.03–2.82, P=0.039) after adjusting for the GRACE Score. Similarly, cathepsin S predicted the combined endpoint of all-cause death or non-fatal MI (adjusted HR=1.67 highest vs. lowest tertile, 95% CI 1.15–2.42, P=0.007) independently of the GRACE Score. When cathepsin S was added over the GRACE Score it correctly reclassified risk for all-cause death in 20% of the population (P=0.004). Similarly, serum Cathepsin S conferred a significant reclassification value over the GRACE score for all-cause death or non-fatal MI in 15.9% of the population. Conclusions Serum cathepsin S is a predictor of mortality and improves risk stratification over the GRACE score in patients with NSTE-ACS. The clinical application of cathepsin S as a novel biomarker in NSTE-ACS should be further explored and validated. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): German Heart Foundation

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document