scholarly journals Pulmonalis eltérések Hodgkin-lymphomában

2016 ◽  
Vol 157 (5) ◽  
pp. 163-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ádám Jóna ◽  
Árpád Illés ◽  
Katalin Szemes ◽  
Zsófia Miltényi

Most of Hodgkin lymphoma patients survive due to combined chemo/radiotherapy. Improved survival brings long-term side effects to the front, which may determine the patients’ subsequent quality of life and expected lifetime. This manuscript aims to analyze lung manifestations of Hodgkin lymphoma and treatment related pulmonary complications, demonstrated with own cases. The lung involvement in Hodgkin lymphoma is often secondary, and primary pulmonary involvement is very rare. The authors found 8–12% of lung involvement among their patients. Side effects of treatment consist of pulmonary infections in conjuction with immunosuppression, while on the other hand bleomycin and chest irradiation as part of current standard of care induced pneumonitis and fibrosis are reported. The pulmonary involvement in Hodgkin lymphoma may cause differential diagnostic difficulty. Lung involvement could modify stage and consequently treatment, and the development of side effects might determine later quality of life and expected lifetime. Therefore, identification of lung involvement is crucial. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(5), 163–173.

2021 ◽  
pp. jnnp-2020-325193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Junker ◽  
Brian D Berman ◽  
James Hall ◽  
Deena W Wahba ◽  
Valerie Brandt ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and both physical and psychiatric factors in a large, international, multicentre cohort of patients with isolated dystonia, the Dystonia Coalition.MethodsNatural history data from 603 patients with isolated dystonia (median age 57 years (IQR: 48 to 64 years), 67.0% women) were prospectively acquired and analysed. HR-QoL (RAND 36-Item Health Survey), severity of depressive symptoms, generalised anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and social anxiety (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) were assessed. Dystonia severity (Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale) and dystonic tremor were examined. Statistical predictors of HR-QoL were calculated using saturated path analysis.ResultsReduced HR-QoL was strongly associated with the degree of depressive symptoms and generalised and social anxiety (8/8 RAND 36 subscales, p≤0.001). Increased dystonia severity was associated with worse physical functioning, physical and emotional role functioning and social functioning (all p≤0.001). The presence of tremor correlated with worse physical functioning and pain (all p≤0.006). Younger age was associated with reduced emotional well-being and vitality (all p≤0.006). There were no HR-QoL differences between sexes.ConclusionHR-QoL in isolated dystonia is strongly associated with psychiatric and physical features. While current standard of care focus on motor aspects of dystonia, comprehensive care should address both physical and mental aspects of health.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alka Mishra ◽  
Lalima Batham ◽  
Vandana Shrivastava

Abstract. Cancer is becoming leading cause of death around the world. India has limited infrastructure and facility to fight the disease. In addition, side effects of current standard therapies like chemotherapy and radiation therapy severely hamper the quality of life (QOL) of patients. Alternative supportive therapies are a dire need, not only to reduce current therapeutic burden, but also to reduce the side effects, and deteriorating QOL of cancer patients. Yagya Therapy is an ancient Vedic therapeutic model, which allows pulmonary inhalation of medeicinal-smoke of multi-herbs combination, generated through its oblation in fire, along with the chanting of mantras. The study attempted to evaluate QOL of life of three cancer patients (breast cancer, mouth cancer and chronic myeloid leukemia), who were prescribed to inhale medicinal-smoke generated using specifically prepared multi-herbs combination as part of Yagya Therapy by Center for Ayurveda Studies at Dev Sanskriti Vishwavidyalaya. Patients continued their normal regime of allopathic treatment and used Yagya Therapy as supportive care. They were assessed for QOL using self-prepared 10-scale questionnaire. All three patients reported improvement in their QOL after taking Yagya Therapy for 12, 7 and 2 months, respectively. Averages of % improvement in all available individual conditions on 10-scale questionnaire, including physical and psychological complaints were 75%, 41.67%, and 40%, respectively. The study indicated the potential of Yagya Therapy using specific multi-herbs herbal preparation as supportive care for improving QOL of cancer patients taking standard allopathic treatments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Rona Yaeger ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
...  

4039 Background: In the BEACON CRC study, the triplet regimen of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR:0.52, P < 0.0001) and objective response rates (ORR, 26% vs 2%, P < 0.0001) in patients (pts) with BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) compared with current standard of care. This analysis focuses on the patient-reported quality of life (QOL) assessments from this study. Methods: The BEACON CRC study was a randomized, open-label, 3-arm, phase 3 global study which evaluated triplet (ENCO+BINI+CETUX) or doublet (ENCO+CETUX) vs. investigator’s choice of irinotecan + CETUX or FOLFIRI + CETUX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. QOL assessments (secondary endpoints in the trial) included the EORTC QOL Questionnaire (QLQ C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colon Cancer (FACT C), EuroQol 5D 5L, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The primary assessment for the QOL variables was the time to definitive 10% deterioration. The study is ongoing. Results: 665 pts were randomly assigned to receive either triplet (n = 224), doublet (n = 220), or control (n = 221). Reduction in the risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.70) and 52% (HR 0., 9485% CI: 0.38, 0.62) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C assessments, respectively, in favor of the triplet regimen over control. For the doublet vs. control, reduction in risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 46% (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.69) and 54% (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.59) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C, respectively in favor of the doublet. Similar results were observed in EuroQol 5D 5L and PGIC assessments. There were no overall differences in QOL between triplet and doublet across the 4 instruments. Conclusions: In BEACON CRC, triplet and doublet demonstrated substantial improvement in patient-reported QOL assessments over the current standard of care in pts with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic CRC whose disease had progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224 .


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Rona Yaeger ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
...  

8 Background: In the BEACON CRC study, the triplet regimen of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR:0.52, P < 0.0001) and objective response rates (ORR, 26% vs 2%, P < 0.0001) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) compared with current standard of care. This analysis focuses on the patient-reported quality of life (QOL) assessments from this study. Methods: The BEACON CRC study was a randomized, open-label, 3-arm, phase 3 global study which evaluated triplet (ENCO+BINI+CETUX) or doublet (ENCO+CETUX) vs. investigator’s choice of irinotecan + CETUX or FOLFIRI + CETUX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. QOL assessments (secondary endpoints in the trial) included the EORTC QOL Questionnaire (QLQ C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colon Cancer (FACT C), EuroQol 5D 5L, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The primary assessment for the QOL variables was the time to definitive 10% deterioration between arms. Results: 665 pts were randomly assigned to receive either triplet (n = 224), doublet (n = 220), or control (n = 221). Reduction in the risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.70) and 44% (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.71) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C assessments, respectively, in favor of the triplet regimen over control. For the doublet vs. control, reduction in risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 46% (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.69) and 43% (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.72) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C, respectively in favor of the doublet. Similar results were observed in EuroQol 5D 5L and PGIC assessments. There were no overall differences in QOL between triplet and doublet across the 4 instruments. Conclusions: In BEACON CRC, triplet and doublet demonstrated substantial improvement in patient-reported QOL assessments over the current standard of care in pts with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic CRC whose disease had progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.


Author(s):  
Joshua A. Sloan ◽  
Philip O. Katz

The medical and lay literature has exploded with reports of adverse events associated with proton pump inhibitors over the last 10 to 15 years. The dissemination of these reports to patients and clinicians have created substantial concerns regarding what has been an exceptionally valuable drug class, dramatically improving patient quality of life, and in many cases preventing life threatening side effects of other medication. Patients are more frequently seeking to avoid these medications, and practitioners are reducing or discontinuing them to the patient’s detriment due to a misunderstanding of the data. This review will discuss the data regarding the most commonly publicized adverse events and attempt to put them in perspective.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mira Sonneborn-Papakostopoulos ◽  
Clara Dubois ◽  
Viktoria Mathies ◽  
Mara Heß ◽  
Nicole Erickson ◽  
...  

AbstractCancer-related malnutrition has a high prevalence, reduces survival and increases side effects. The aim of this study was to assess oncology outpatients and risk of malnutrition. Reported symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in patients found to be at risk of malnutrition or malnourished were compared to patients without malnutrition. Using a standardized questionnaire, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Quality of Life and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), patients in an outpatient cancer clinic undergoing chemotherapy treatment at a German University Hospital were assessed for nutrition, risk of malnutrition and quality of life. Based on the MNA, 39 (45.9%) patients were categorized as malnourished or at risk for malnutrition. Loss of appetite (n = 37.6%, p < 0.001) and altered taste sensation (n = 30,3%, p < 0.001) were the symptoms most frequently associated with reduced food intake. Patients with risk of malnutrition scored lower on the global health status (n = 48.15%, p = 0.001). Side effects of cancer treatments lead to a higher risk of malnutrition and as a consequence lower QoL. These side effects should be addressed more efficiently in cancer care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Truffaut ◽  
Lucas Demey ◽  
Anne Violette Bruyneel ◽  
Alain Roman ◽  
Stephane Alard ◽  
...  

AbstractLung function impairment persists in 55% of critical COVID-19 patients three months after ICU discharge. Patient lung function, exercise capacity, radiologic, and quality of life data suggest impairment is related to radiologic lung involvement at admission.


Author(s):  
Vladica M. Velickovic ◽  
Jean P. Lembelembe ◽  
Francisco Cegri ◽  
Ivana Binic ◽  
Amr B. Abdelaziz ◽  
...  

The aim of the research is to assess the benefit–harm of superabsorbent polymers wound dressings based on polyacrylate polymers (SAPs) compared with standard of care (SoC) dressing mix for patients with moderate-to-highly exuding hard-to-heal leg ulcers. The SoC dressings mix was composed of other superabsorbents in 29% of cases, antimicrobials 26%, foams 20%, alginates 5%, and other dressings 19% weighted according to their frequency. We have used the decision-analytic modeling method, Markov process, as an adequate analytical solution for medical prognosis. We have combined the systematic literature search to identify the most relevant inputs for the analysis, with available patient-level clinical data concerning benefits of superabsorbent to generate a robust prediction of patient-relevant outcomes, including healing rates and health-related quality of life. Besides, we have qualitatively described adverse events associated with those treatments. Our research indicates that SAPs when compared with SoC dressing mix in a patient with moderate-to-highly excluding leg ulcers are leading to an improved healing rate with an absolute risk difference of 2.20% in 6 months and a relative risk of 1.07 in favor of SAP dressings. The attributable fraction among those exposed to SAP dressings of 6.6%, meaning that 6.6% of the healed ulcers could be attributed to having had the SAP dressing treatment instead of the SoC dressing treatment. Besides, SAP dressings lead to improved quality of life measured as incremental quality-adjusted life weeks (QALWs) of 0.13 QALWs.


Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonessa Boing ◽  
Tatiana do Bem Fretta ◽  
Melissa de Carvalho Souza Vieira ◽  
Gustavo Soares Pereira ◽  
Jéssica Moratelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Breast cancer is a global public health issue. The side effects of the clinical treatment can decrease the quality of life of these women. Therefore, a healthy lifestyle is essential to minimize the physical and psychological side effects of treatment. Physical activity has several benefits for women with breast cancer, and Pilates solo and belly dancing can be an enjoyable type of physical activity for women with breast cancer undergoing clinical treatment. The purpose of this study is to provide a Pilates solo and a belly dance protocol (three times per week/16 weeks) for women undergoing breast cancer treatment and compare its effectiveness with that in the control group. Methods The participants will be allocated to either the intervention arm (Pilates solo or belly dance classes three times per week for 16 weeks) or a control group (receipt of a booklet on physical activity for patients with breast cancer and maintenance of habitual physical activity routine). The Pilates solo and belly dance classes will be divided into three stages: warmup and stretching, the main stage, and relaxation. Measurements of the study outcomes will take place at baseline; postintervention; and 6, 12, and 24 months after the end of the intervention (maintenance period). The data collection for both groups will occur with a paper questionnaire and tests covering general and clinical information. The primary outcome will be quality of life (EORT QLQ-C30 and EORT QLQ-BR23), and secondary outcomes will be physical aspects such as cardiorespiratory fitness (6-min walk test and cycle ergometer), lymphedema (sum of arm circumference), physical activity (IPAQ short version), disabilities of the arm (DASH), range of motion (goniometer test), muscular strength (dynamometer test) and flexibility (sit and reach test), and psychological aspects such as depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory), body image (Body Image After Breast Cancer Questionnaire), self-esteem (Rosenberg), fatigue (FACT-F), pain (VAS), sexual function (FSFI), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). Discussion In view of the high prevalence of breast cancer among women, the implementation of a specific protocol of Pilates solo and belly dancing for patients with breast cancer is important, considering the necessity to improve their physical and psychological quality of life. Pilates solo and belly dancing are two types of physical activity that involve mental and physical concentration, music, upper limb movements, femininity, and social involvement. An intervention with these two physical activities could offer options of supportive care to women with breast cancer undergoing treatment, with the aim being to improve physical and psychological quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03194997. Registration date 12 August 2017. Universal Trial Number (World Health Organization), U1111-1195-1623.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document