scholarly journals Results of a Phase II of Low-Dose Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide Combined with Standard Dose Rituximab (FCR-LITE) in Elderly, Untreated Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): The Israeli CLL Study Group Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5566-5566
Author(s):  
Tamar Tadmor ◽  
Yair Herishanu ◽  
Andrei Braester ◽  
Osnat Bairey ◽  
Ariel Aviv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Positive Direct

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of elderly patients. Despite the development of novel agents and new monoclonal antibodies, FCR still remains the combination chemoimmunotherapy of choice for fit patients with CLL, yielding the longest durations of remission. When this study was first started, no established chemo-immunotherapy regimen was unanimously regarded as standard therapy for less fit elderly patients with CLL; this category of patients had clearly been underrepresented in clinical trials utilizing chemo - or chemo-immunotherapy. Patients and Methods We conducted a single arm, phase II trial to assess the efficacy and toxicity of low dose fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with a regular dose of rituximab (FCR-LITE) in elderly patients with therapy naïve CLL. Our intention was to deliver 6 courses of Fludarabine which was given intravenously (IV) at 12.5 mg/m2/day together with IV cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days. IV rituximab was administered on day 0 of cycle 1 at a dose of 375 mg/m2, and at 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycles 2-6. Categorical variables were compared in patients with and without CR using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were also compared using Mann Whitney test. Duration of follow-up was recorded using reverse censoring method. Kaplan Meier curve was used to establish PFS during clinical follow-up. All statistical tests were two sided. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results Forty patients treated with FCR-LITE were included in the efficacy analysis. The median age of the entire cohort was 72.7 years (range, 65.0 to 85.0), and 69% were male. The mean number of treatment cycles was 5.1 (range 1-6). The overall response rate was 67.5% (95% CI, 50.9%-81.4%); 17 patients (42.5%) achieved CR and 10 (25.0%) PR. Median PFS was 35.5 months (95% CI, 29.27-41.67). Two patients (4.8%) died during the study period. Reduced cumulative doses of FCR and fewer courses of treatment were both associated with lower CR rate. Hematological toxicities were the most common side effects encountered; grade-3/4 neutropenia occurred in twenty (47.6%) patients, only six (14.3%) developed neutropenic fever. Positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), was seen in 11 patients but none of them developed autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) during treatment; two patients (4.8%) progressed to Richter's transformation and two (4.8%) had second malignancies (lung and metastatic colon carcinoma). Conclusion FCR-LITE is effective and safe for treating elderly patients with therapy-naïve CLL. It has the advantage of being both time and cost effective. In an era of novel agents, it can still be considered as suitable frontline treatment for fit elderly patients with CLL. This research was supported by roche pharmaceuticals Table. Table. Disclosures Tadmor: ABBVIE: Consultancy; ROCHE: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy; JNJ: Consultancy; PFIEZER: Consultancy. Herishanu:JNJ: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; ROCHE: Research Funding. Bairey:ROCHE: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Jansen: Research Funding. Aviv:ABBVIE: Consultancy; ROCHE: Research Funding. Rahimi-Levene:ABBVIE: Consultancy. Fineman:ABBVIE: Consultancy; JNJ: Consultancy. Ruchlemer:JNJ: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy. Shvidel:JNJ: Consultancy; ROCHE: Consultancy, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Consultancy, Research Funding. Polliack:ABBVIE: Consultancy; ROCHE: Research Funding.

Low Dose Oral Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide in Elderly Patients with Untreated and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2055-2055
Author(s):  
Francesco Forconi ◽  
F. Toraldo ◽  
E. Sozzi ◽  
M. Lenoci ◽  
A. Fabbri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Thrombocytopenic Purpura ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
Dose Oral

Abstract The intravenous regimen of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (FC) at conventional doses is highly effective in Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), where it is currently indicated in first line therapy, and low-grade non Hodgkin lymphomas (LG-NHL). We have shown that intravenous or oral FC regimens at reduced doses remain highly effective in elderly patients with LG-NHL other than CLL. We tested tolerability and efficacy of oral FC at reduced doses in elderly patients with previously untreated (UT-CLL) or relapsed/refractory CLL (R-CLL). Twenty-five patients (&gt;60 years) with UT-CLL (n=13) or R-CLL (n=12) were given oral F (25mg/m2/day, 40 mg total dose) and C (150mg/m2/day, 200 mg total dose) in an outpatient regimen for 4 consecutive days every 4 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. Patients were evaluated after every cycle for toxicity and hematological response. Toxicity was defined according to NCI criteria. Responses were defined as Complete (CR) when a normalization of blood count and misurable masses (lymph nodes and spleen) was documented, partial (PR) when at least a 50% reduction of lymphocytosis or nodes/splenomegaly occured, no response (NR) when disease was stable (less than PR) or progressed (&gt;25% increment of tumor manifestations). Progression, new treatment or death was defined as “event”. Median age of the whole population was 70 years (range 61–80), 70 (61–80) in the UT-CLL, 71 (62–79) in the R-CLL. M:F distribution was 14:11 (7:6 in UT-CLL, 7:5 in R-CLL). Performance status was ≥1 in 80% patients. Of 25 patients, 16 (64%) were diagnosed CLL in stage A, 8 (32%) in stage B, 1 (4%) in stage C. Tumor IGHV gene was unmutated in 90% cases (in 85% UT-CLL, in 100% R-CLL). CD38 was positive in 68% (77% UT-CLL, 55% R-CLL) and ZAP-70 in 68% (82%, 67%). Chromosomal deletions of 11q or 17p regions were documented in 25.5% patients (27% UT-CLL, 25% R-CLL). The R-CLL had received 1–4 (median 2) treatment lines prior to FC. Median time from diagnosis or from prior treatment to FC was 24 months (range 1–77), 37 (1–77) in the UT-CLL, 12 (3–48) in the R-CLL. Overall, biological risk and clinical characteristics were indicative of an aggressive behavior of the investigated cohort. Patients received median 3 cycles (4 in UT-CLL, 3 in R-CLL). Nine-of-25 (36%) reduced the number of cycles because of fatigue (1 patient), heart failure (1), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (1) in the UT-CLL (3/13) or infection (2), femur fracture (1), prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia or pancitopenia (2) and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (1) in the R-CLL (6/12). Overall, 23/25 patients (92%) obtained a response (11/25 CR, 44%; 12/25 PR, 48%). Among UT-CLL, all responded to treatment (8/13 CR, 61.5%; 5/13 PR, 38.5%). Among R-CLL, 10/12 (83.5%) responded (3/12 CR, 25%; 7/12 PR, 58.5%; 2/12 NR, 16.5%). With a median follow-up of 23 months, 14/25 patients (56%) were event-free and 23/25 (92%) were alive. Among UT-CLL (median follow-up 12 months), 9/13 (69%) were event-free and all were alive. Among R-CLL (median follow-up 25 months), 5/12 (42%) were event-free and 10/12 (83%) were alive. Deaths occurred in the 2 R-CLL that had not responded to treatment, after 2 and 4 years, respectively. Despite the poor risk of the investigated population, this low-dose oral FC treatment showed good efficacy both in untreated and refractory/relapsed CLL. The treatment may be useful in elderly patients who cannot benefit of more aggressive or eradicating strategies and is easy to administer on an outpatient basis.

Preliminary Results of a Phase II Open-Label, Randomized Study of the BH3 Mimetic Protein Navitoclax (ABT-263) with or without Rituximab for Treatment of Previously Untreated B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 190-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Eradat ◽  
Sebastian Grosicki ◽  
John Catalono ◽  
Walter Cosolo ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Binet Stage ◽  
Bh3 Mimetic

Abstract Abstract 190 Introduction: Overexpression of Bcl-2 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is associated with enhanced CLL-cell resistance to spontaneous or chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. The BH3 mimetic protein navitoclax (ABT-263) specifically inhibits Bcl-2, and related proteins Bcl-xL and Bcl-w, and can induce apoptosis of CLL cells in vitro. Phase I evaluation in relapsed/refractory CLL patients demonstrated 35% overall response rate (Roberts, 2012). Dose-limiting thrombocytopenia due to Bcl-xL inhibition was mitigated using a lead-in dosing schedule to allow the bone marrow to achieve a compensatory increase in platelets prior to dose escalation to the MTD of 250 mg. Based on the promising single-agent data, a Phase II trial randomized trial compared the safety, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of treatment with navitoclax and rituximab (RTX) versus RTX alone. Methods: Patients with CLL who required initial treatment according to iwCLL criteria (Hallek et al, 2008) were stratified by Binet stage and high-risk cytogenetic features (17p deletion and/or 11q deletion), and randomized 1:1:1 to receive RTX weekly for 8 wks (375 mg/m2 wk 1, 500 mg/m2 wks 2–8) (Arm A), or RTX for 8 wks plus navitoclax daily for 12 wks (250 mg/day following a 7–14 day lead-in period of 100 mg/day) (Arm B), or RTX for 8 wks plus navitoclax daily as in Arm B, but continued treatment with navitoclax until disease progression, relapse, or unacceptable toxicity (Arm C). Arm A to Arm B crossover was permitted. Response rate was assessed by iwCLL CLL response criteria at week 12, and every 12 weeks during follow-up. The study was stopped after the last patient had completed ≥ 12 weeks of treatment and week-12 response assessment. Results: Baseline characteristics and prognostic factors for the 118 randomized patients were generally balanced among the three treatment arms. Median age was 63 years (range 38–94), and 55% were Binet stage B+C. Median baseline lymphocyte count was 53,000 mm3 (range 7,000–552,000/mm3). FISH analyses identified higher than expected rates of deletion of 11q or 17p in the CLL cells of 32% or 28% of patients, respectively. Median time on study was 32 weeks overall (24 wks for Arm A, 33 wks Arm B, and 44 wks Arm C). AEs of Grade 3–4 that were more common (> 5% greater) in a navitoclax-treated arm compared with the RTX arm included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, GI symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain), chills, fatigue, ALT/AST/bilirubin elevations, and infusion-related reactions (to RTX). Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and hepatic enzyme elevations were generally reversible when navitoclax was stopped and/or dose-reduced; however, 12 patients (15%) discontinued navitoclax due to laboratory abnormalities (9 due to ALT elevations). Neutropenia responded to growth factors. One serious event of epistaxis occurred related to the thrombocytopenia. Two deaths occurred on study, one on the RTX-only arm due to a pulmonary embolus and one on Arm B due to hypotension and dyspnea related to a severe RTX infusion reaction. Investigator-assessed objective response (CR and PR) rate was 35% for Arm A, 55% for Arm B (p=0.19 vs A), and 70% for Arm C (p=0.0034 vs A). All responses were PRs except for 2 CRs in Arm C. All responses were confirmed by CT (and BM for CR) ≥ 8 wks after clinical response assessment. While the presence of 17p deletion appeared to result in a lower response rate to RTX alone (Arm A, ORR 18%, 2/11 pts), it did not appear to affect the response to ABT-263 and RTX (Arm B, ORR 73%, 8/11 pts); Arm C, ORR 50%, 5/10 pts. Limited PFS results appeared consistent with the responses by arm, with a longer PFS associated with the longer duration of ABT-263 treatment on Arm C; however, the magnitude of PFS differences could not be precisely quantified due to the limited follow-up and patient number. Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis did not detect any drug interaction between navitoclax and RTX. Conclusions: Navitoclax in combination with RTX weekly × 8 was generally well-tolerated as initial therapy for CLL patients and demonstrated greater clinical activity than treatment with RTX alone as well as responses in patients with 17p deletion. The preliminary results of this study indicate that a BH3-mimetic inhibitor of Bcl-2 could be highly effective when used in combination with RTX for treatment of patients with CLL. Disclosures: Eradat: Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: BH3 Mimetic Protein Navitoclax (ABT-263). Catalono:Genentech: Consultancy. Kipps:Genentech: Research Funding. Zheng:Genentech: Employment. Yalamanchili:Genentech: Employment. Sahasranaman:Genentech: Employment. Hurst:Genentech: Employment. Ho:Genentech: Employment.

scholarly journals Lenalidomide and Rituximab Maintenance Therapy after Front-Line Induction Chemoimmunotherapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5470-5470
Author(s):  
Julie E Chang ◽  
Vaishalee P. Kenkre ◽  
Christopher D. Fletcher ◽  
Aric C. Hall ◽  
Natalie Scott Callander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Second Malignancies ◽  
Front Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
11Q Deletion ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is incurable with standard therapy. With first-line chemotherapy, some patients (pts) may achieve durable remissions of many months/years. Lenalidomide (LEN) has improved progression-free survival (PFS) when given as maintenance (MNT) therapy after front-line chemotherapy (CALGB10404, CLLM1). The combination of LEN + rituximab (LR) has activity in relapsed CLL, hypothesizing benefit as MNT therapy after first-line chemotherapy. Methods: Adult pts ≥18 years with previously untreated CLL received induction bendamustine (B) 90 mg/m2 IV days 1 & 2 and rituximab (R) IV day 1 (375 mg/m2 cycle 1, then 500 mg/m2 cycles 2-6) for 6 treatment cycles (as few as 4 cycles allowed). MNT therapy with LR was initiated within 12 weeks after cycle 6, day 1 of BR. Criteria to start LR MNT included: neutrophils ≥1000/microliter (uL), platelets ≥75 K/uL, and creatinine clearance ≥40 mL/min. LEN was administered in 28-day cycles for 24 cycles, initially 5-10 mg daily continuous dosing, later modified to 5-10 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle in 6/2018 due to neutropenia and second malignancy risk. LEN was reduced to 5 mg every other day for toxicities at 5 mg/day. R 375 mg/m2 IV was given every odd cycle (total of 12 doses). Patients discontinuing LEN for any reason were allowed to continue R MNT per protocol. The primary endpoint is PFS with LR MNT therapy, calculated from the first day of MNT therapy until progressive disease (PD), death, or start of a new therapy. Secondary endpoints are response rate and overall survival. Results: Thirty-four pts have enrolled beginning 11/2013, with follow-up through 6/2019. Median age is 64 years, with 8 pts ≥70 years; 8 women and 26 men. CLL FISH panel is available on all pts: 14 with 13q (as sole abnormality), 9 with 11q deletion, 6 with trisomy 12, 4 with normal FISH panel and 1 with 17p deletion. Heavy chain mutation analysis is available on 11 pts: 8 unmutated, 2 mutated, 1 indeterminate. Thirty-one pts completed 4 (n=2) or 6 cycles of induction BR; 3 pts are receiving induction BR. Twenty-four pts have received MNT LR; 7 did not receive LR for reasons of PD during induction (n=2), infection (n=1), pt preference (n=2), renal insufficiency (n=1), and new carcinoma (n=1). MNT LR was completed in 7 pts; 9 pts are still receiving LR. Fourteen subjects have discontinued protocol therapy, 3 during induction due to PD (n=2) and infection (n=1), and 8 during MNT. Toxicities that led to discontinuation of LR were recurrent infections in 7 pts, including 2 events of PJP pneumonia; 4 pts had recurrent neutropenia with infections; 1 pt had neutropenia without infections. Response is assessable in 31 patients using the International Working Group Consensus Criteria. Best responses to treatment were: partial response 65% (22/34), complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR 24% (8/34). The median number of MNT cycles received is 16. The dose intensity of LEN across total cycles received (n=278): 5 mg every other day (52.5%), 5 mg/day (43.9%), and 10 mg/day (3.6%). The most common reason for dose reduction or dose holding was neutropenia. Most common Gr 3/4 toxicities (reported as events Gr3/Gr4) during MNT therapy were: neutropenia (20/20), leukopenia (19/4), febrile neutropenia (3/1), and infections (11/-). The majority of Gr3 infections were pneumonia/respiratory (n=5). One event of disseminated herpes zoster occurred. Second malignancies during MNT included: basal cell CA (n=1), squamous cell carcinoma (n=5), and colon cancer (n=1). No unexpected second malignancies were observed in pts receiving LR. Two-year PFS (defined from day 1 of MNT therapy) is 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1), and the median follow-up for 24 patient who started maintenance therapy is 1.79 years (95% CI 1.53-2.7). There have been no deaths. Conclusion: The combination of LR is effective in sustaining remissions after a BR induction in previously untreated CLL, but with frequent neutropenia and infections even at low doses of LEN. Most patients discontinuing MNT did so due to neutropenia and/or infections. A shorter planned interval of MNT LR (i.e., 6-12 months) may confer similar benefit to extended dosing that is more tolerable. Pts at high risk for short remissions after front-line chemotherapy (e.g., unmutated heavy chain status, 11q deletion and/or failure to achieve minimal residual disease after induction) may be the populations for which LR MNT therapy is most appropriate. Disclosures Chang: Genentech: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide administered as maintenance therapy for first treatment of CLL/SLL.

scholarly journals Long-Term Sustained Responses Following Ibrutinib Discontinuation after Frontline Therapy with Obinutuzumab Plus Ibrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Paula A. Lengerke Diaz ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Eider F. Moreno Cortes ◽  
Jose V. Forero ◽  
Juliana Velez-Lujan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

Single oral targeted therapies have emerged as a standard of care in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, accessibility, side effects, and financial burden associated with long term administration limit their clinical use. Mainly, it is unclear in what clinical situation discontinuation of oral therapy can be recommended. The combination of type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab-Gazyva® with ibrutinib (GI) has shown a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients (pts) with CLL, including those with high-risk genomic aberrations. We conducted a phase 1b/2, single-arm, open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GI as first-line treatment in 32 CLL pts. We report the outcome in pts that discontinued ibrutinib (either after 3 years of sustained complete response (CR) as stipulated in the clinical protocol, or due to other reasons). CLL pts enrolled in this protocol were ≥65 years old, or unfit/unwilling to receive chemotherapy. Pts received GI for six cycles, followed by daily single-agent ibrutinib. The protocol was designed to ensure that pts with a sustained CR after 36 months were allowed to discontinue ibrutinib. The median age was 66 years (IQR 59-73), and 6% of the evaluated pts had 17p deletion. All pts were able to complete the six planned cycles of obinutuzumab. The combination regimen was well-tolerated, and the most common adverse events (&gt;5% CTCAE grade 3-4) were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hyperglycemia. The rate and severity of infusion-related reactions (IRR) were much lower than expected (Grade≥ 3, 3%), and pts without IRR had lower serum levels of cytokines/chemokines CCL3 (P=0.0460), IFN-γ (P=0.0457), and TNF-α (P=0.0032) after infusion. The overall response rate was 100%, with nine pts (28%) achieving a CR, and four pts (12.5%) with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in the bone marrow, defined as &lt;10-4 CLL cells on multicolor flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 35.5 months (IQR 24.5-42.7) after starting treatment, 91% of the enrolled pts remain in remission with a 100% overall survival. Sixteen pts have completed a long-term follow-up of 36 months. Six pts showed CR, with three of them achieving uMRD in the bone marrow. Ten of these pts were in PR, and only one had disease progression and started treatment for symptomatic stage I disease with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. In total, thirteen pts (41%) have stopped ibrutinib, with a median time on treatment prior to discontinuation of 35 months. Five (16%) of these pts had CRs and discontinued after 36 months. Eight additional pts (25%) had PRs and discontinued ibrutinib without being eligible: three pts discontinued prior to 36 months due to toxicities, and five pts discontinued after 36 months (3 due to side effects, and 2 due to financially driven decision). One patient eligible to discontinue ibrutinib, decided to remain on treatment despite sustained CR. After a median follow up time following ibrutinib discontinuation of 8 months (IQR 3.5-17), only two out of 13 pts have progressed (10 and 17 months after Ibrutinib discontinuation). None of the pts that stopped ibrutinib after achieving a CR have shown signs of disease progression. Of note, the pharmaceutical sponsor provided ibrutinib for the first 36 months, after which pts or their insurer became financially responsible. This particular scenario could bias the discontinuation pattern compared to a real world experience. It also provided us with a perspective about diverse factors affecting the treatment choices of pts. In summary, the obinutuzumab plus ibrutinib combination therapy was well-tolerated, with a much lower IRR rate. Efficacy compares favorably with historical controls with all pts responding to therapy, no deaths associated with treatment or disease progression, and a longer than expected time-to-progression after discontinuation of ibrutinib. The rate of ibrutinib discontinuation was higher than reported in the literature, most likely influenced by the protocol design and financial decisions driven by the switch from sponsor-provided ibrutinib to insurance or self-paid medication. Our observations regarding safety, efficacy and lack of disease progression after ibrutinib discontinuation are encouraging, and warrant confirmation in long-term prospective studies. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02315768. Funding: Pharmacyclics LLC. Disclosures Choi: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Amaya-Chanaga:AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Other: Research performed while employed as an investigator of this study at UCSD.. Kipps:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Castro:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptoms in Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Results from the Phase II GIBB Study of the Combination of Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3491-3491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Danilov ◽  
Habte A Yimer ◽  
Michael Boxer ◽  
John M Burke ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). GIBB (NCT02320487) is an open-label, single-arm phase II study of obinutuzumab (GA101; G) in combination with bendamustine (G-Benda) in patients with previously untreated CLL. A previous report from the GIBB study demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate of 89.2%, a complete response rate of 49.0%, and no unexpected safety signals with G-Benda (Sharman et al. J Clin Oncol 2017). Here we report the final HRQoL data over 3 years from the GIBB study. Methods: Enrolled patients received G-Benda by intravenous infusion over six 28-day cycles: G 100mg on Day (D)1, 900mg on D2, and 1000mg on D8 and D15 of Cycle (C)1, then 1000mg on D1 of C2-6; benda 90mg/m2 on D2-3 of C1, and on D1-2 of C2-6. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) includes a global health status measure, 5 functional scales (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning), 8 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and an item on financial difficulties (Aaronson et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) is a 16-item module, specific to CLL, containing 4 multi-item scales (fatigue, treatment side effects, disease symptoms, and infection) and 2 single items (social activities and future health worries). Both questionnaires were completed by patients on C1D1 (baseline), C3D1, and C6D1, at the end of induction (EOI) treatment (defined as +28 days from C6D1 or early treatment termination visit), at the response visit (defined as 2-3 months after the EOI treatment for all patients who received study treatment and had not experienced disease progression), and every 3 months thereafter at follow-up visits for up to 2 years. In total, there were 14 timepoints where data were collected. HRQoL scores were linear transformed to a 0-100-point scale. Mean baseline scores and mean score changes from baseline at each visit were evaluated. A threshold of ≥10-point change in score represents a clinically meaningful difference. For symptoms, negative change scores from baseline reflect an improvement in symptom burden. For global health status and functioning, positive change scores from baseline reflect improvements. Results: The trial enrolled 102 patients. Median age was 61 years and 68.4% of patients were male. Ninety-eight patients (96%) completed a questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 other questionnaire during a follow-up visit. Questionnaire completion rates at 14 time points ranged from 96% at baseline to 66% at 27 months follow-up (Table 1). According to the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Figure 1), improvements were observed for global health status at all follow-up visits, and clinically meaningful improvements were observed at the response visit, 3 months follow-up, and 27 months follow-up. Clinically meaningful improvements in role functioning were observed at EOI and persisted throughout the 27-month follow-up. For fatigue, clinically meaningful improvements were observed at every visit starting from the end of treatment (EOT) visit. Improvements were also observed for insomnia with mean reductions from baseline ≥10 points at various time points during follow-up. There was no worsening in other patient-reported symptoms or functional status over time. Similarly, with the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 (Figure 2), clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were observed for fatigue, disease symptoms, and future health worries during treatment, at the EOT and/or throughout the follow-up. The largest improvement was observed for fatigue (-24.7) at the 24-month follow-up and future health worries (-25.4) at the 27-month follow-up. Conclusions: We previously reported that G-Benda is an effective regimen for first-line treatment of CLL with no unexpected safety signals. The HRQoL data from the GIBB trial suggest that G-Benda treatment consistently improved patient HRQoL over time. Several clinically meaningful improvements were observed in HRQoL, including global health status, functioning, symptoms, and future health worries. Disclosures Danilov: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Yimer:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy. Boxer:Gerson Lerman: Consultancy; Best Doctors: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Burke:Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Babu:Genentech: Research Funding. Li:Genentech: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership. Mun:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trask:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Masaquel:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Employment. Sharman:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: GAZYVA (obinutuzumab) is a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody and is indicated: in combination with chlorambucil, for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia; in combination with bendamustine followed by GAZYVA monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapsed after, or are refractory to, a rituximab-containing regimen

An Effective and Tolerable Chemoimmunotherapy Regimen For Relapsed/Refractory and Very-High Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Combining Alemtuzumab With Pentostatin and Low Dose Rituximab

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1641-1641
Author(s):  
Clive S. Zent ◽  
Betsy R LaPlant ◽  
Wenting Wu ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
Deborah Bowen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Purine Analogue ◽  
Very High

Abstract Patients with very-high risk (purine analogue refractory and TP53 defective) CLL have limited treatment options. In these patients alemtuzumab can be effective against CLL cells in the circulation and bone marrow, and in combination therapy with fludarabine can be active in patients with bulky disease, but these regimens have a high risk of serious infections. Addition of rituximab to alemtuzumab can also improve efficacy but has limited activity against bulky disease. We conducted a phase II clinical trial to determine the efficacy and toxicity of therapy with pentostatin, alemtuzumab, and low dose higher frequency rituximab (PAR) in patients with relapsed/refractory or progressive CLL with 17p13 deletion. The rituximab schedule was designed to decrease the loss of CD20 expression by circulating CLL cells. Methods This two-stage phase II trial study (NCT00669318) conducted at the Mayo Clinic Rochester and University of Iowa with IRB approval had an accrual goal of 38 evaluable patients. Eligibility required a diagnosis of progressive CLL by standard criteria and either previous treatment for CLL (<4 purine analogue regimens) or 17p13 deletion (17p13-). Exclusion criteria were organ failure, poor performance status (ECOG >3), infection with HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, active autoimmune cytopenia, or alemtuzumab therapy within the past 2 months. Rituximab 20 mg/m2 IV M-W-F started on day 1, alemtuzumab started on day 3 with an escalation of 3-10-30 mg/d SQ and then 30 mg M-W-F from day 8, and pentostatin 2 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks started on day 8. Peg-G-CSF or GM-CSF was used after each dose of pentostatin and patients received Pneumocystis and Varicella prophylaxis. CMV PCR assays were done weekly during treatment and viremia was treated with either valganciclovir or ganciclovir. Cycle 1 was 5 weeks and subsequent cycles were 4 weeks. At the end of cycle 2 patients with a clinical CR had a CT scan and a bone marrow study with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for residual CLL cells, and therapy was stopped if there was no radiological or IHC evidence of residual CLL (stringent CR). Patients with residual disease received a 3rd cycle of therapy. Results Forty-one patients were enrolled (July 2008 - February 2013) and all 39 who started therapy were evaluable for response: Median age 61 years (range 47-78), 30 (77%) males, 36 (92%) relapsed/refractory CLL (median prior regimens = 2, range 1-10), 3 (8%) previously untreated, 23 (59%) advanced stage (Rai III-IV), 16 (41%) intermediate stage (Rai I-II). Prognostic factors: FISH (hierarchical classification) 15 (38%) 17p13-, 6 (15%) 11q22-, 5 (13%) 12+, 3 (8%) no defects, 8 (21%) 13q14-, and 2 (5%) other abnormalities, IGHV analysis (n=38) 27 (71%) unmutated (<2%), ZAP-70 (n=37) 28 (76%) positive (>20%). Thirty (77%) patients completed planned therapy (28 had 3 cycles, 2 had 2 cycles with stringent CR). Nine patients received one (n=4) or two (n=5) cycles of therapy because of disease progression or complications. Grade 3-4 hematological adverse events (n=37) at least possibly related to treatment included neutropenia (n=22), thrombocytopenia (n=11), anemia (n=2) and hemolysis (n=2). Non-hematological adverse events (n=17) included infections/neutropenic fever (n=8), fatigue (n=3), and hemorrhage (n=2). CMV reactivation was detected and treated in 14 patients (grade 1-2). No patients died during treatment or from treatment related complications. The overall response rate was 56% (95% CI 40-72) with 4 (10%) CR, 7 (18%) CRi, 11 (28%) PR, 7 (18%) SD, and 10 (26%) PD. Four patients (3 CR and 1 CRi) had IHC negative bone marrow studies. Thirteen (33%) patients have died due to progressive CLL (n = 11), sepsis (n=1), and pneumonia (n=1). Median follow up for surviving patients is 23 months (range 3-55). Seven (18%) patients proceeding to RIC allogeneic transplant were censored for time to next treatment. Twenty-one (54%) patients required therapy for progressive CLL and 7 (18%) have required no further therapy. Median progression free survival was 7 months (95% CI: 5-16), time to next treatment 9 months (95% CI: 6-27) and median overall survival has not been reached. Discussion PAR was effective and tolerable therapy for high-risk CLL. This study suggests that alemtuzumab can be used safely in combination with a purine analogue in a short-duration regimen. Disclosures: Zent: Genentech : Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Biothera: Research Funding; GlaxSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Pentostatin therapy for CLL, use of lower doses of rituximab.

Heritable Predisposition To Richter Syndrome In Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2867-2867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer A. Parikh ◽  
Susan L Slager ◽  
Kari G. Rabe ◽  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
James R Cerhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Chromosome 18 ◽  
Richter Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Translocation Breakpoints

Abstract Background Approximately 2-8% patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) will transform to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, Richter syndrome [RS]). Clinical characteristics and molecular markers at the time of CLL diagnosis are associated with the risk of RS; however, there are no data regarding germline genetic variations and the risk of RS. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) have shown several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are associated with a higher risk of familial CLL. It is not known whether any of these polymorphisms also predispose to RS. Methods Since 2002, all consecutive patients with newly diagnosed (<9 months diagnosis) CLL at Mayo Clinic were offered enrollment into a prospective genetic epidemiology study. Patients completed extensive epidemiologic questionnaires and baseline clinical, laboratory, and biologic data were abstracted using a standard protocol. Genotyping of germline tissue at diagnosis was performed using an Illumina iSelect panel and Affymetrix 6.0 SNP chip. All patients were prospectively and longitudinally followed at defined time-points with systematic collection of data on treatments, second cancers, and RS. All patients with biopsy-proven DLBCL during follow-up were considered to have undergone transformation into RS. Time to RS was calculated from CLL diagnosis date until RS or until last follow-up date for those with no RS. SNPs were modeled in two ways: ordinal and dominant. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) for individual SNPs with time to transformation. Results Thirteen of the GWAS-discovered SNPs associated with risk of developing CLL were available and genotyped on 620 CLL patients. Median age at diagnosis of CLL was 62 years (range 27-88), and 428 (69%) were male. Three hundred and ten (51%) patients were low (0) Rai stage, 271 (45%) were intermediate (I-II) Rai stage, and 22 (4%) were advanced (III-IV) Rai stage. The immunoglobulin heavy chain gene was unmutated in 189 (40%) patients; 157 (32%) patients expressed ZAP-70, 163 (29%) expressed CD38 and 104 (31%) expressed CD49d. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) revealed that 210 (41%) patients had del13q, 90 (18%) patients had trisomy 12, 37 (7%) had del11q, 23 (5%) had del17p and 141 (28%) had no detectable FISH abnormalities. As of last follow-up, 239 (39%) patients received therapy for CLL. After a median follow-up of 5.9 years (range 0-11), 15 (2.4%) patients developed biopsy-proven RS. The median time to RS in these 15 patients was 4.5 years (range 1.0-8.7 years). The ordinal HR for the 13 SNPs tested, their corresponding genes, and p-values are shown in Table 1. Germline polymorphisms in a single SNP, rs4987852, encoding for BCL2 (chromosome 18), was significantly associated with an increased risk of RS (ordinal HR=3.9; 95% CI=1.6-9.8; p-value=0.004). This allele was present in 48/605 (8%) non-transformed CLL patients compared to 4/15 (27%) of patients with RS. Time to RS according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis for rs4987852 is shown in Figure 1. This SNP is located in a region in which t(14;18) translocation breakpoints commonly occur in follicular lymphoma and overexpression of BCL2 leads to an increased incidence of B-cell lymphomas in mice. Conclusion Our results suggest that inherited genetic polymorphisms predispose CLL patients to develop RS. Specifically, SNP (rs4987852) present on the BCL2 gene on chromosome 18 in CLL is associated with an increased risk of transformation to RS. These observations require replication in other CLL cohorts. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding.

Early Results Of a Phase II Study Of Lenalidomide and Rituximab As Frontline Treatment Of Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4183-4183
Author(s):  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
Christina Hinojosa ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Susan C. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is an active treatment for patients (pts) with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), with 66% Overall Response Rate (ORR) and a median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of 17.4 months (JCO 2013). We therefore sought to evaluate its efficacy and tolerability in untreated pts. Methods Twenty-five pts with untreated CLL have been enrolled. Rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously) was administered weekly during cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 3 to 12. Lenalidomide was started on day 9 of cycle 1 at 10 mg orally and administered daily continuously. Each cycle was 28 days. Rituximab was administered for 12 cycles; lenalidomide could continue indefinitely. Response was assessed every 3 cycles by 2008 NCI-WG criteria. Treatment-related toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). The primary end point of this study was ORR. Secondary objectives included PFS and Overall Survival (OS). PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using the log-rank test. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test (two tailed). Differences were considered significant if p≤.05. Results Baseline characteristics of the 25 pts are shown in Table 1. Twenty-four pts are evaluable for toxicity (one pt was taken off study after only 7 days due to the diagnosis of widely metastatic pancreatic cancer) and 20 for response (2 pts too early, 3 pts early discontinuation). So far 5 pts received 1 cycle, 1 pt received 2 cycles, 6 pts received 3 cycles, 5 received up to 6 cycles and 8 received 12 or more cycles of therapy. ORR by 2008 NCI-WG criteria is 85%, including 2 (10%) complete remission (CR) and 15 (75%) partial remissions (PR). No significant association between ORR and baseline characteristics was observed. At the latest follow-up, the median dose of lenalidomide was 5 (2.5-10) mg and 14 (56%) pts needed at least one interruption because of toxicity. Grade 3-4 toxicities are summarized in Table 2. No episodes of grade 3-4 tumor flare were observed and 7 (29%) pts experienced a grade 1 or 2 tumor flare. Eight (32%) pts have so far discontinued treatment: 1 because of metastatic pancreatic cancer diagnosed after only 1 week on study, 2 because of progressive disease (after 4 months and 13 months), and 5 because of toxicity (skin rash in 3 pts, a deep venous thrombosis in 1 pt, and persistent neutropenia in 1 pt). Two of the 5 pts who discontinued treatment have required subsequent therapy. Twenty-four pts are alive, 1 pt died of metastatic pancreatic cancer after treatment discontinuation. At a median follow-up of 9 (1-17) months, median PFS and median OS have not been reached. Conclusions Our initial experience with the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab as front-line treatment of CLL indicates that this combination is tolerated by the majority of pts and responses are seen in 85% of them. Enrolment in this study is ongoing. Disclosures: O'Brien: CELGENE: Consultancy. Ferrajoli:CELGENE: Research Funding.

Renal Disease In Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5302-5302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tait D Shanafelt ◽  
Kari G. Rabe ◽  
Curtis A Hanson ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
Susan Schwager ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Renal Insufficiency ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) can effect renal function in a variety of ways including direct infiltration of the kidney, ureteral obstruction by lymphadenopathy, and treatment related tumor lysis syndrome (uric acid nephropathy). Rarely, CLL has also been reported to be associated with light chain nephropathy, renal amyloidosis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), granulomatous interstitial nephritis (GIN), and minimal change disease (MCD). Nearly all the data on the effects of CLL on renal function is at the case report level. We systematically evaluated the prevalence of renal insufficiency at diagnosis as well the incidence of acquired renal insufficiency during follow-up in a large cohort of patients with newly diagnosed CLL to more accurately define the effects of CLL on the kidney and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods Between January 1995 -February 2013, previously untreated CLL patients seen in the Division of Hematology at Mayo Clinic at diagnosis (<12 months) and who had baseline assessment of serum creatinine were included in this analysis. Patients with serum creatinine (Cr) ≥1.5 mg/dL at baseline were classified as having renal insufficiency at diagnosis. Patients who initially had baseline creatinine <1.5 mg/dL but who developed a Cr≥1.5 mg/dL during the course of their disease were considered to have acquired renal insufficiency. Results Existing renal insufficiency at the time of CLL diagnosis: Of 2047 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 153 (7.5%) patients had renal insufficiency (Cr≥1.5 mg/dL) at the time of CLL diagnosis including 15 (0.7%) with a Cr≥3 mg/dL. Renal insufficiency was also more common among men (9.3% vs. 3.9%; p<0.00001), those with advanced stage disease (Rai 0=7.0%; Rai I-II=6.4%, Rai III-IV=20.2%; p<0.0001), and CD49d positive patients (6.8% vs. 3.8%; p<0.038). Patients with renal insufficiency at diagnosis were also older (median age 72.2 vs. 63.9; p<0.0001). No difference in the prevalence of renal insufficiency at diagnosis was observed based on cytogenetic abnormalities detected by FISH or CD38, ZAP-70 or IGHV gene mutation status. Although renal insufficiency at diagnosis was strongly associated with OS on univariate analysis (p<0.001), no association was observed between renal insufficiency and TTT or OS on multi-variate analysis adjusting for age, sex, and Rai stage. Acquired renal insufficiency during CLL disease course: Among the 1894 patients with normal renal function at diagnosis, 304 (16.1%) acquired renal insufficiency (Cr≥1.5 mg/dL) during the course of their CLL disease course including 43 (2.3%) with peak Cr≥3 mg/dL. In addition to age (older) and male sex, a number of CLL disease characteristics were associated with a higher likelihood of acquired renal insufficiency including: IGHV UM (OR=2.0; p=0.0001), unfavorable FISH (del17p- or 11q-; OR=2.0; p=0.001), and being CD49d+ (OR=1.8; p=0.002), ZAP-70+ (OR=1.6; p=0.004), or CD38+ (OR=1.4; p=0.0.032),. Shorter TTT (p<0.001) and OS (P<0.001) was observed among patients with initially normal creatinine who acquired renal insufficiency (Figure 1A and 1B). On MV analysis adjusting for age, sex, and stage at diagnosis, acquired renal insufficiency remained an independent predictor of TTT (OR=1.77; p=0.001) and OS (OR=2.67; p<0.001). Renal insufficiency and therapy selection After median follow-up of 4.5 years (range 0-18.0), 620 of 2047 (30.3%) patients have progressed to require treatment. Patients with renal insufficiency prior to treatment were less likely to receive purine nucleoside analogue based therapy and more likely to receive single agent alkylator based treatment. Conclusions Approximately 1 in every 13 patients (7.5%) with CLL has renal insufficiency at the time of diagnosis and an additional 16.1% acquire renal insufficiency during the course of the disease. The risk of developing renal insufficiency is associated with a variety of CLL B-cell characteristics and is associated with TTT and OS. Data on causes of acquired renal insufficiency is being abstracted and will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding. Off Label Use: MK2206 in a phase 1 trial of CLL.

Outcome of Second Line Treatment in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Did Not Improve 2002-2013: A Population-Based Study from a Well-Defined Geographic Region

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4166-4166
Author(s):  
Anna Asklid ◽  
Agnes Mattsson ◽  
Einar Björgvinsson ◽  
Maria Winqvist ◽  
Sandra Eketorp Sylvan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains challenging. Major progress has been achieved with new agents such as ibrutinib and idelalisib. However relapses still occur with these agents or the treatment has to be withdrawn (Byrd et al, Blood 2015). Several new drugs have been or are currently tested in pivotal, non-controlled phase 2 trials on R/R CLL patients, with the majority of patients on 2nd line therapy following chemoimmunotherapy. Thus, reliable and matching historical data are required for comparison. We have previously reported on the outcome of heavily pretreated refractory patients (Eketorp Sylvan et al, Leuk Lymphoma 2014). The aim of the this study was to specifically investigate the outcome of 2nd line treatment prior to the access of small molecule-based treatment options, in consecutive patients from a well-defined geographical region, where almost complete follow-up exists and external referrals are minimal. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CLL were identified from the Cancer Registry in Stockholm (Nov 2002- Dec 2013) and patient files were reviewed individually to identify R/R patients. Efficacy and toxicity of 2nd line and later salvage therapies were recorded as well as long term follow-up. Patients were also grouped into treated in the early (Nov 2002-2007) and late time period (2008-2013) and compared regarding outcome. A multivariate cox proportional hazards model was perform to explore risk factors for outcome. Results: Chart review of 979 patients identified 148 consecutive, non-referred patients with R/R CLL undergoing various types of 2nd line salvage therapy. Median age was 73 years and 53% had Binet stage C. Del17p testing was available in 46% of patients of which 20.6% had del17p. Most frequently initiated treatments in 2nd line were chlorambucil (27.7%), FC (23.6%) and FCR (13.5%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 48.6% (3.4% CR). Median overall-survival (OS) from start of second line therapy was 37.9 months. Shorter OS was significantly associated with ECOG higher than 0, male sex, and age > 80 years. There was no difference in OS, PFS or ORR between those treated in the first vs the second time period of this study, despite that 2nd line use of chlorambucil decreased from 39% to 23% and use of FCR or BR increased from 0% to 26% from 2002-2007 to 2008-2013. However, median duration of response was significantly longer during the later time period (20.9 vs 10.3 months, p=0.035). During treatment, 50.7% of patients were hospitalized and 32.4% of patients experienced grade III-IV infections. Other AEs ≥ grade 3 occurred in 10.1% and 7.4% had bleeding events. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, according to IWCLL-criteria, occurred in 0.7%/0.7% (Hb), 11.5%/8.8% (platelets) and 16.9%/36.5% (neutrophils). Toxicity was similar in both time periods. Conclusion: Our study describes the outcome of 2nd line treatment in R/R CLL in consecutive patients from a geographically well defined region with almost complete follow-up and without influence on the results from external referrals. Almost no improvement was observed in the outcome of 2nd line treatment during the 10 year period. Such real-world results may be used for comparison with data obtained in non-controlled phase 2 trials on new orphan drugs. Keywords: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Relapsed, Refractory, Clinical outcome Disclosures Asklid: Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Mattsson:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Björgvinsson:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Winqvist:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Eketorp Sylvan:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Søltoft:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Repits:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Diels:Janssen: Employment. Österborg:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Hansson:Jansse Cilag: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document