Phase I and Preliminary Results of a Phase II Study (TERAPLASCoV2) of Convalescent Plasma in Patients with Severe and Life-Threatening Pneumonia Caused By Sars-Cov-2

Introduction: The current coronavirus disease- 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a sudden increase in pneumonia cases, with a case-fatality rate of 10.9% in Mexico. Two inpatient groups have been defined, with different clinical evolution: cases of severe pneumonia and those with life-threatening disease (Acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV] requirement, and multiorgan involvement). Currently, there is no effective treatment. Convalescent plasma (CP) has been used to treat another viral infections and outbreaks since the last century. The rationale is that neutralizing antibodies contained in CP suppress viremia and produce immunoregulation. However, an established therapeutic dose during this pandemic is lacking. Aim: To evaluate in a phase I trial the minimum effective dose of CP in severe and life-threatening disease patients and then carry out a phase II study to establish the effectiveness (overall survival at 30 days) comparing it with a non-randomized control group. Methods and design. Our study is an open-label, multicenter, non-randomized and started in May, 2020 and was approved by the ethics committee at HGE & HCN Pemex; respectively. CP donor selection: pre-donors who were infected by SARS-CoV-2 were evaluated on +30 day by serum titration (≥1:320 IgG antibody); then connected to apheresis machine to obtain 600 ml of CP that were fractionated in 200 ml bags and stored. Patients: Two groups were formed: severe and life-threating disease. CP was offered to patients who were admitted on two hospitals. Patients should meet the following criteria: SARS-CoV-2 positive for qRT- PCR, respiratory rate> 30 per minute or Kirby index <300 or IMV requirement; be older than 18 years; and sign the informed consent. Statistics: For demographic variables, the differences were evaluated with parametric or non-parametric analysis. For survival, Kaplan Meier curves were assessed for each group. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Outcomes: A total of 110 CP bags have been transfused. The median serum IgG antibody titers were 1: 960. Dosing, phase 1. Severe group (n=14): 71% received two CP bags (400 ml) and 29% three CP bags (600 mL). Life-threatening disease group (n=10): 60% received 4 CP bags (800 ml) and 40% 3 CP bags (600 ml). Dose was established at 400 ml for the severe group and 800 ml for the life-threatening group. Security: CP infusions were well tolerated, with only 3 adverse events (2.72%) reported: one case of transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO) that resolved with the use of loop diuretics as a serious adverse event; one fever episode (grade 1) and one case of rash (grade 1) after CP infusion. Phase II: The calculated n to be included in each arm (severe vs. life-threatening disease) is 68 and 52 patients, respectively. So far, we have included a total of 42 patients treated with CP. This entire cohort was compared with a historic group of COVID-19 patients who received other treatment strategies. Clinical characteristics on both plasma (PG) and control group (CG) are presented in table 1. We observed statistically significant differences on smoking habit, D-Dimer levels and ARDS severity between groups. The median overall follow- up was 24 days [PG 28 days vs. CG 21.5 days]. Overall Survival (OS) between PG and CG was 74% vs. 54% at 30-days respectively [HR=0.43 (C.I.95%=0.23 to 0.91, p=0.021); figure 1]. We analyzed OS by group stratification: COVID-19 severity (severe disease vs. life-threatening disease) and ARDS severity. We found no difference in OS between severe disease-PG and severe disease-CG; but we observed an OS difference between life-threatening-PG and life-threatening-CG [32% vs. 5.8% at 30-days; p=0.003]. ARDS-PG vs. ARDS-CG showed OS differences in moderate [59% vs. 25% at 30 days; p=0.01, respectively] and severe ARDS [63% vs. 0%; p=0.001, respectively]; however, there was not statistically significant difference between mild ARDS-PG and CG groups [89% vs. 86%; p=0.85, respectively]. Conclusion: This is the first phase I trial aiming to establish an effective CP dose for COVID-19 patients, at least in México. For severe and life-threatening disease, 2 and 4 CP bags were suggested. This treatment was secure, with <3% of adverse events reported. OS could be modified using certain doses based on disease severity and pa02/Fi02 index. We will continue to include patients until the calculated n is reached. Disclosures Villela: Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

A phase I/II trial of erlotinib S-1 therapy in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma: Thoracic Oncology Reseach Group (TORG) 0808/0913.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e18099 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e18099-e18099

Author(s):

Naoyuki Nogami ◽

Tetsu Shinkai ◽

Toshiyuki Kozuki ◽

Atsuko Ogino ◽

Yuka Kato ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Synergistic Effects ◽

Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽

Mrna Levels ◽

Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽

Basic Studies

e18099 Background: Gefitinib has been shown in basic studies to reduce the expression of thymidilate synthase, the target enzyme for the 5-FU-based chemotherapy, at the protein and mRNA levels, and synergistic effects of gefitinib used in combination with S-1 have been reported. Erlotinib also reduced TS expression and activity. The present studies were designed as study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of erlotinib/ S-1 combination therapy as a 2nd/3rd-line therapy for recurrent/advanced NSCLC. Methods: Chemotherapy consisted of two 3-week cycles of erlotinib and S-1 treatment. Erlotinib was orally administered once daily at a dose of 150 mg/body, and patients received an oral dose of S-1 twice daily after meals from days 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle. In phase I trial(TORG0808), the primary endpoint was to evaluate the DLT and the MTD for the following phase II study, and the secondary endpoint was to evaluate the antitumor activity and safety. Based on the phase I trial, we conducted a phase II trial (TORG0913) of this combination with pretreated EGFR negative NSCLC to determine the ORR. The secondary endpoints were PFS, disease control rate, OS, and safety. Results: 7 patients with good PS (0 or 1) and 10 patients with PS 0-2 participated in phase I and phase II trial. In phase I trial, the recommended doses for the phase II study were determined to be 150mg/body and 80mg/m2. The ORR was 67%, and 3/4 responders are EGFR positive patients. In phase II trial, the ORR was very low (only one patient).Myelosuppression was relatively mild, but Grade 3 or worse non-hematological toxicities including diarrhea, mucositis, and dermatitis were observed in 6 patients, which resulted in two treatment-related deaths. Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended the early termination, and the clinical trial was terminated due to adverse events. Conclusions: Phase I study showed the favorable efficacy and moderate safety profiles of this combination especially in EGFR positive patients, but less effective and too toxic in EGFR negative patients in phase II trial.

Download Full-text

CAPRISA 018: a phase I/II clinical trial study protocol to assess the safety, acceptability, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a sustained-release tenofovir alafenamide subdermal implant for HIV prevention in women

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052880 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. e052880

Author(s):

Tanuja Narayansamy Gengiah ◽

Quarraisha Abdool Karim ◽

Ishana Harkoo ◽

Leila Mansoor ◽

Nonhlanhla Yende Zuma ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Percentage Change ◽

African Women ◽

Control Group ◽

Health Products ◽

Tenofovir Alafenamide ◽

Long Acting ◽

Hiv Acquisition

IntroductionYoung African women bear a disproportionately high risk for HIV acquisition. HIV technologies that empower women to protect themselves are needed. Safe, potent antiretroviral agents such as tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), formulated as long-acting subdermal implants, offer an innovative solution.Methods and analysisCAPRISA 018 is a phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety, acceptability, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of a TAF free base subdermal silicone implant containing 110 mg of TAF with an anticipated 0.25 mg/day release rate.The phase I trial (n=60) will assess the safety of one implant inserted in six participants (Group 1), followed by dose escalation components (Groups 2 and 3) assessing the safety, tolerability and PK of one to four TAF 110 mg implants releasing between 0.25 mg and 1 mg daily in 54 healthy women at low risk for HIV infection. Data from this phase I trial will be used to determine the dosing, implant location and implant replacement interval for the phase II trial.The phase II component (Group 4) will assess extended safety, PK, tolerability and acceptability of the implant in 490 at risk women, randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the TAF implant and placebo tablet or to the placebo implant and an oral pre-exposure prophylaxis tablet. Safety will be assessed by calculating the percentage change in creatinine clearance from baseline at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 72, 96 and 120, compared with the percentage change in the control group.Ethics and disseminationThe South African Health Products Regulatory Authority and the University of KwaZulu-Natal’s Biomedical Research Ethics Committee have approved the trial. Results will be disseminated through open access peer reviewed publications, conference presentations, public stakeholder engagement and upload of data into the clinical trials registry.Trial registration numberPACTR201809520959443.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of pathotropic nanoparticles bearing a dominant negative cyclin G1 construct for chemoresistant osteosarcoma and other sarcomas: Phase I, II, and III studies

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.10513 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 10513-10513 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

S. P. Chawla ◽

V. S. Chua ◽

L. Fernandez ◽

D. Quon ◽

A. Saralou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Dose Response ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Response Relationship ◽

Dose Response Relationship ◽

Free Survival

10513 Background: (1) To evaluate the safety/anti-tumor potential of intravenous (i.v.) Rexin-G in chemotherapy-resistant sarcoma (Phase I/II), and (2) to confirm the efficacy/safety of i.v. Rexin-G in chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma (Phase II). Methods: Twenty patients in the Phase I/II study and 22 patients in the Phase II study received 1–2 × 10e11 cfu Rexin-G i.v., 2–3 times a week for 4 weeks. Treatment was continued if the patient had < Grade 1 toxicity. Results: Treatment-related adverse events included chills (n=1), presyncope (n=1), photophobia (n=1) of Grade 1 severity, and fatigue (n=4) of Grade 1–2 severity. In the Phase I/II sarcoma study, 3/6 patients had stable disease at Dose Level 0, median progression free survival (PFS) was 5 weeks, and overall survival (OS) was 14 weeks, while 10/14 patients had stable disease at Dose Level I-II, median PFS was 16 weeks and median OS was 34 weeks. Cox regression analysis showed a dose-response relationship between PFS/OS and Rexin-G dosage (p = 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). The Table below shows the results for evaluable patients (n=17) in the Phase II study for osteosarcoma. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows a dose-response relationship between overall survival and Rexin-G dosage in the combined Phase I/II sarcoma and Phase II osteosarcoma studies (p = 0.02; n=42). Two patients achieved surgical remissions which are sustained for >26 weeks. Conclusions: These studies suggest that (i) intravenous Rexin-G is safe and well-tolerated, and (ii) Rexin-G controls tumor growth and prolongs progression-free survival and overall survival in a dose-dependent manner in chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma and sarcoma. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

A pilot study of levetiracetam as a sensitizer of temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A prospective, open-label, phase II study (KBTS-1601 study).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.2560 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 2560-2560

Author(s):

Chae-Yong Kim ◽

Kihwan Hwang ◽

Jong Hee Chang ◽

Seok-Gu Kang ◽

Tae-Young Jung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Performance Status ◽

Control Group ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Open Label ◽

Adjuvant Temozolomide ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2560 Background: We evaluated the survival benefit of levetiracetam as a chemosensitizer of temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: This was an open-label, multicenter, phase II study (NCT02815410). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed glioblastoma with an ECOG performance status of 0-2. All patients received radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day) followed by adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2/day for 5 days during six 28-day cycles). The first dose of levetiracetam was given just after the surgery at 250mg orally twice a day and increased up to 500mg twice a day prior to radiation. This prospective study was designed to test whether levetiracetam in conjunction with temozolomide improved survival. The historical control group was based on data from a study by Gwak et al. for Korean patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with a median overall survival(OS) of 17.5 months and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.1 months. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled between August 2016 and January 2019. The median follow-up duration was 24.9 months (range, 7.9-35.5). All patients completed standard radiation therapy with temozolomide, and 39 (84.8%) patients completed six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Median overall survival (OS) was 30.0 months, and median PFS was 15.0 months. OS at 6, 12, and 24 months was 100%, 91.3%, and 60.7%, respectively. PFS at 6, 12, and 24 months was 93.2%, 65.3%, and 22.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Addition of levetiracetam during concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide along with radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma may result in improved outcomes compared to historical data and merits further study. Clinical trial information: NCT02815410 .

Download Full-text

Randomized Phase Ii Study of S-1 Plus Oral Leucovorin (Sl) Versus Sl Plus Oxaliplatin (Sol) Versus S-1 Plus Cisplatin (Sp) in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (Agc):Updated Overall Survival Data

Annals of Oncology ◽

10.1093/annonc/mdu334.10 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 25 ◽

pp. iv213 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

K. Yamaguchi ◽

S. Hironaka ◽

N. Sugimoto ◽

T. Moriwaki ◽

Y. Komatsu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Survival Data ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Randomized Phase Ii

Download Full-text

Carboplatin, S-1 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter Phase I/II study

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1093/jjco/hyz039 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 49 (7) ◽

pp. 614-619 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Seiji Niho ◽

Yukio Hosomi ◽

Hiroaki Okamoto ◽

Keiji Nihei ◽

Hiroshi Tanaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Radiation Pneumonitis ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Small Cell ◽

Thoracic Radiotherapy ◽

Small Cell Lung

Abstract Objectives We conducted a Phase I/II study of carboplatin, S-1 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for elderly patients (71 years or older) with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods Patients received carboplatin (AUC 3-5) on Day 1 and S-1 (30–40 mg/m2 two times daily) on Days 1–14, every 2 weeks, for up to four cycles, plus concurrent TRT at a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint for the Phase II study was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Results Eighteen patients were enrolled in the Phase I study. Febrile neutropenia, a decreased platelet count and esophagitis were dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended doses for the Phase II study were determined to be an AUC of 3 for carboplatin, 40 mg/m2 twice daily for S-1. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated in the Phase II study. The 1-year PFS rate was 57.1% (90% CI 41.6–71.4%), and the median PFS was 16.8 months (95% CI 7.8–not assessable [NA]). The lower limit of the 90% CI for 1-year PFS exceeded the prespecified threshold value of 30%; therefore, the primary endpoint was met. Grades 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (21%) and hyponatremia (11%). Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was observed in 18% of patients. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusion Combination chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin plus S-1 and concurrent TRT had a promising efficacy in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC; however, radiation pneumonitis was frequently observed.

Download Full-text

Intrathecal Mafosfamide: A Preclinical Pharmacology and Phase I Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2005.06.053 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 23 (7) ◽

pp. 1555-1563 ◽

Cited By ~ 47

Author(s):

Susan M. Blaney ◽

Frank M. Balis ◽

Stacey Berg ◽

Carola A.S. Arndt ◽

Richard Heideman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Neoplastic Meningitis ◽

In Vitro Cytotoxicity ◽

Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽

Preclinical Studies ◽

Phase Ii Trials ◽

Cytotoxicity Studies

Purpose Preclinical studies of mafosfamide, a preactivated cyclophosphamide analog, were performed to define a tolerable and potentially active target concentration for intrathecal (IT) administration. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of IT mafosfamide was performed to determine a dose for subsequent phase II trials. Patients and Methods In vitro cytotoxicity studies were performed in MCF-7, Molt-4, and rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines. Feasibility and pharmacokinetic studies were performed in nonhuman primates. These preclinical studies were followed by a phase I trial in patients with neoplastic meningitis. There were five dose levels ranging from 1 mg to 6.5 mg. Serial CSF samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic studies in a subset of patients with Ommaya reservoirs. Results The cytotoxic target exposure for mafosfamide was 10 μmol/L. Preclinical studies demonstrated that this concentration could be easily achieved in ventricular CSF after intraventricular dosing. In the phase I clinical trial, headache was the dose-limiting toxicity. Headache was ameliorated at 5 mg by prolonging the infusion rate to 20 minutes, but dose-limiting headache occurred at 6.5 mg dose with prolonged infusion. Ventricular CSF mafosfamide concentrations at 5 mg exceeded target cytotoxic concentrations after an intraventricular dose, but lumbar CSF concentrations 2 hours after the dose were less than 10 μmol/L. Therefore, a strategy to alternate dosing between the intralumbar and intraventricular routes was tested. Seven of 30 registrants who were assessable for response had a partial response, and six had stable disease. Conclusion The recommended phase II dose for IT mafosfamide, administered without concomitant analgesia, is 5 mg over 20 minutes.

Download Full-text

Phase I Trial of Escalating-Dose Irinotecan Given Weekly With Cisplatin and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2003.02.147 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 21 (15) ◽

pp. 2926-2932 ◽

Cited By ~ 77

Author(s):

David H. Ilson ◽

Manjit Bains ◽

David P. Kelsen ◽

Eileen O’Reilly ◽

Martin Karpeh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Esophageal Cancer ◽

Phase I ◽

Induction Chemotherapy ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Concurrent Radiotherapy ◽

Minimal Toxicity ◽

Grade 3

Purpose: To identify the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly irinotecan combined with cisplatin and radiation in esophageal cancer. Patients and Methods: Nineteen patients with clinical stage II to III esophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma were treated on this phase I trial. Induction chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and irinotecan 65 mg/m2 was administered for four treatments during weeks 1 to 5. Radiotherapy was delivered weeks 8 to 13 in 1.8-Gy daily fractions to a dose of 50.4 Gy. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and escalating-dose irinotecan (40, 50, 65, and 80 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of radiotherapy. DLT was defined as a 2-week delay in radiotherapy for grade 3 to 4 toxicity. Results: Minimal toxicity was observed during chemoradiotherapy, with no grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, diarrhea, or stomatitis. DLT caused by myelosuppression was seen in two of six patients treated at the 80-mg/m2 dose level, thus irinotecan 65 mg/m2 was defined as the recommended phase II dose. Dysphagia improved or resolved after induction chemotherapy in 13 (81%) of 16 patients who reported dysphagia before therapy. Only one patient (5%) required a feeding tube. Six complete responses (32%) were observed, including four pathologic complete responses in 15 patients selected to undergo surgery (27%). Conclusion: Cisplatin, irinotecan, and concurrent radiotherapy can be administered on a convenient schedule with relatively minimal toxicity and an acceptable rate of complete response in esophageal cancer. Further phase II evaluation of this regimen is ongoing. A phase III comparison to fluorouracil or taxane-containing chemoradiotherapy should be considered.

Download Full-text