scholarly journals Phase 2 March Study: ATG-010 Plus Low Dose Dexamethasone in Chinese Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients Previously Treated with an Immunomodulatory Agent (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4770-4770
Author(s):  
Lugui Qiu ◽  
Weijun Fu ◽  
Zhongjun Xia ◽  
Zhengzheng Fu ◽  
Wenming Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: ATG-010 (selinexor) is a novel, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export, which blocks exportin 1. US FDA has approved selinexor plus low dose dexamethasone (Sd) to treat patients (pts) with penta-refractory MM based on the STORM study. MARCH is a single arm, Phase 2, registrational study to assess efficacy and safety of Sd in Chinese pts with RRMM. Methods: Enrolled Chinese pts were previously refractory to PI, IMiD, and last line of therapy. ATG-010 (80mg) plus dexamethasone (20mg) was administered twice weekly. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per independent review committee. The planned 82 pts would provide ~80% power to test against null hypothesis (H 0) of 15% ORR at one-sided α of 0.025 at the primary analysis, which is presented here. Results: As of 6 th May 2021, 9 (11%) of the 82 pts were still on treatment. Median follow-up was 10.6 months (mo) (range: 2.3-19.6). Median age was 60 years (39% ≥ 65yrs). Median duration from MM initial diagnosis was 3.2 years. A total of 61 pts (74.4%) had cytogenetic abnormalities (del(17p): 22.0%), 18 (22.0%) with baseline plasmacytoma, and 18 (22.0%) with creatinine clearance < 60ml/min. Median number of prior regimens were 5 (range 1-16); 23 pts (28.0%) had received daratumumab (triple-class exposure), 20 pts were triple-class refractory (TCR), and10 pts (12.2%) had undergone CAR-T therapy. ORR was 29.3% (95% CI: 19.7, 40.4), rejecting H 0, including 4 VGPR (very good partial response). Median duration of response (DOR) was 4.7 mo, median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.7 mo, and median overall survival (OS) was 13.2 mo. Among 20 TCR pts, ORR was 25.0% (95% CI:8.7, 49.1), mDOR 10.2 mo, mPFS 2.9 mo, and mOS 11.9 mo. Efficacy was evident in elderly pts (≥ 65yrs), with ORR 25% (95% CI: 11.5, 43.4) and mPFS 2.8 mo. Median OS and DOR were not reached. Sd also demonstrated a similar response rate in pts with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, with an ORR of 24.6% (95% CI: 14.5, 37.3). Efficacy of Sd was generally consistent across cytogenetic risk subgroups, including del (17p) pts with ORR 22.2% (95% CI: 6.4, 47.6), mDOR 3.8mo, and mPFS 2.9 mo. The most common non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade included nausea (78%), hyponatremia (67.1%), weight loss (65.9%), decreased appetite (62.2%), asthenia (59.8%)/fatigue (15.9%), and vomiting (50.0%). The most common grade≥3 non-hematologic TEAE were hyponatremia (29.3%), pneumonia (26.8%), hypokalemia (12.2%) and asthenia (9.8%)/fatigue (2.4%). The most common grade≥3 hematologic TEAEs were anemia (57.3%), lymphopenia (76.8%), thrombocytopenia (51.2%), and neutropenia (40.2%). TESAE occurred in 54.9% of pts, with the most common being thrombocytopenia and pneumonia (14.6% each). TEAE led to death in 7 pts (8.5%). Elderly pts had no significantly increased risk of adverse events, however, given their limited physical state, drug exposure was shorter in the elderly subgroup (12.6 vs 16.1 weeks), suggesting more active supportive care is required. Conclusions: MM refractory to both IMiD and PI remains a high unmet medical need, especially in China. The MARCH study demonstrates statistically significant and clinically meaningful ORR with Sd in Chinese RRMM pts, and efficacy was consistent across subgroups, including the elderly and pts with high-risk cytogenetics. Adverse events were as expected and manageable with appropriate supportive care and dose modification. These data are compatible with the STORM study and offers a new, oral therapeutic option for MM patients. Disclosures Yu: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment. Wang: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment. Yang: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment. Yu: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment. Lynch: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment.

Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results of the Randomized Phase III Study (06011) of the EORTC Leukemia and German MDS Study Groups

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 226-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre WijerMans ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Liliana Baila ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: In 2002 the EORTC and the German MDS Study Group initiated a randomized phase III study comparing low dose Decitabine to supportive care in patients (pts) of 60 years or older with primary or secondary MDS or CMML. MDS patients with either 11–20% BM blasts or ≤ 10% blasts and poor cytogenetics could be included. Pts with a BM blast count between 21–30% without signs of disease progression for at least one month were also candidates for the study. Methods: Patients were centrally randomized; stratification factors were cytogenetics risk group, IPSS, MDS (primary vs secondary) and study centre, The treatment schedule was 15 mg/m2 Decitabine i.v. over 4 hours every 8 hours for the first 3 three consecutive days, of every 6 week-cycle, for a maximum of 8 cycles. Results were evaluated every 2nd cycle. When a complete remission was reached at least another 2 courses were given. The primary endpoint of the study was Overall Survival. AML free survival, Progression Free Survival (PFS), response rate, toxicity and QoL were secondary endpoints. A total of 185 deaths were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (alpha=5%, beta=20%). Intent-to-treat analysis was used. Results: Between 10.2002 and 5.2007 a total of 233 pts (149 male and 84 female) were recruited from 40 centres. The median age was 70 (60–90 years); RAEB-t was diagnosed in 32% of the pts. Most pts had an IPSS Intermediate-2 (55%) or high risk (38%). Poor risk cytogenetics was found in 46% of the patients. Prior therapy for MDS (not being intensive chemotherapy) was given in 20% of pts. The randomized groups were well balanced regarding stratification factors, age and FAB classification. The median follow up was 2.5 years. Time to Off Study was 180 (Decitabine) vs 112 days (SC arm). The median number of cycles given to the patients was 4 with 40%getting no more than 2 cycles. In a significant number of pts, subsequent treatment, consisting of transplant (10%) or induction chemotherapy (11%), was given. The distribution of best response in Decitabine vs SC arm was CR (13% vs 0%), PR (6% vs 0%), HI (15% vs 2%), SD (14% vs 22%), PD (29% vs 68%), hypoplasia (14% vs 0%), inevaluable (8% vs 8%). The 18 pts on Decitabine with a HI showed the following responses: 3-lineage (n=7), 2-lineage (n=5) and 1-lineage (n=6). The median time to response (CR/PR/HI) was 0.32 yrs and the response duration was 0.72 years. Median OS was 0.84 (Decitabine) vs 0.71 years (SC arm), estimated HR was 0.88, 95% CI 0.66–1.17, p=0.38 (logrank 2-sided). The PFS was significantly (p=0.004) longer in Decitabine vs SC arm: median was 0.55 vs 0.25 years, HR=0.68 (95% CI 0.52–0.88). Time to AML or Death was not significantly improved (p=0.24): median was 0.73 vs 0.51 years (HR=0.85, 95% CI 0.64–1.12). Toxicity. The toxicity was mainly cytopenia related toxicity that was either disease related or hematotoxicity; CTC grade 3–4 febrile neutropenia was 26% (Decitabine) vs 7% (SC arm) and Grade 3–4 infection was 59% vs 47%. Differences in non hematologic toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal: grade 1–2 nausea (28% vs 16%) and grade 1–2 vomiting (16% vs 9%). During the study period, 29 (Decitabine) vs 25 (SC arm) patients died: due to either progression to MDS/AML (7 vs 20), toxicity (9 vs 0), progression and/or toxicity (10 vs 1), other reasons (3 vs 4). Conclusions. Decitabine was found to be an effective drug in these high risk MDS patients with a overall RR of 34%, (similar to earlier studies), leading to a significant PFS improvement as compared to SC arm. The difference Decitabine vs SC arm regarding time to AML or Death was not significant. Due to shorter treatment duration (not being continued beyond 8 cycles) and maybe also due to subsequent treatments administered after disease progression, the difference regarding OS was lower (HR=0.88) and not statistically significant.

Phase 2 study of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, in patients (pts) with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC; Group 1): 12-month follow-up.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9526-9526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander David Guminski ◽  
Annette May Ling Lim ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Chrysalyne D. Schmults ◽  
Leonel Fernando Hernandez-Aya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

9526 Background: Primary analysis (Oct 2017) of cemiplimab (REGN2810) in pts with mCSCC in a Phase 2 study demonstrated substantial antitumor activity, durable responses, and acceptable safety profile. We now report 12-month follow-up data from these pts (NCT02760498; data cutoff date: Sep 20, 2018). Methods: Pts with mCSCC received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W). Tumor measurements were performed Q8W. The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) according to independent central review (per RECIST 1.1 for scans; modified WHO criteria for photos). Results: 59 pts (median age: 71 years) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 16.5 months (range: 1.1–26.6). ORR by central review was 49.2% (95% CI: 35.9–62.5; 10 CRs and 19 PRs [4 CRs and 25 PRs by investigator-assessment (INV)]). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached. The longest DOR at data cut-off was 21.6 months and was still ongoing. Observed DOR exceeded 12 months in 22/29 pts (75.9%) with response. Durable disease control rate (stable disease or response for ≥16 weeks) was 62.7% (95% CI: 49.1–75.0). Median observed time to response was 1.9 months (range: 1.7–9.1). Median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 7.3–not evaluable); median overall survival has not been reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades, Grade ≥3) were diarrhea (28.8%, 1.7%), fatigue (25.4%, 1.7%), and nausea (23.7%, 0%). By INV, grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 13.6% of pts. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates substantial antitumor activity and increasing DOR with cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q2W in pts with mCSCC. There were no new safety signals. These data strongly support the recent FDA approval of cemiplimab-rwlc for pts with mCSCC or locally advanced CSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation. Clinical trial information: NCT02760498.

A phase II trial of low-dose nab-paclitaxel for patients with previously treated or recurrent advanced gastric cancer (OGSG1302).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 350-350
Author(s):  
Masashi Hirota ◽  
Shigeyuki Tamura ◽  
Hirokazu Taniguchi ◽  
Atsushi Takeno ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Relative Dose Intensity ◽  
Grade 3

350 Background: Paclitaxel is a key drug in second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC) and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is also widely used in Japan. A previous phase II trial in Japan showed the effectiveness of nab-PTX (260 mg/m2) administered every 3 weeks (q3w) in patients with AGC with a response rate (RR) of 27.8%; however, toxicity was major concern with grade ≥3 neutropenia (49.1%) and peripheral neuropathy (23.6%). To solve this problem, we investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose q3w nab-PTX regimen in AGC. Methods: Eligibility requirements included: aged ≥20 years, HER2-negative, histologically confirmed, unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma, one or more prior chemotherapy containing fluoropyrimidine regimens, presence of measurable lesion(s) according to RECIST ver. 1.1, ECOG PS of 0–2, and adequate organ function. Nab-PTX was administered at a dose of 220 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RR. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events, relative dose intensity and proportion of patients who received subsequent chemotherapy. Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled from 10 institutions in Japan. Of the 32 patients treated with protocol therapy, RR (CR, PR) was 3.1% (95% CI, 0–16.2%), which was not reached the protocol-specified threshold (p = 0.966). DCR (CR, PR, SD) was 37.5% (95% CI, 21.1–56.3%), median OS and PFS were 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.4–14.2) and 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.1). Relative dose intensity was 97.8% (215 mg/m2). 62.5% of patients received subsequent chemotherapy. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (38%), anemia (13%), fatigue (19%), anorexia (16%), and peripheral neuropathy (13%). Conclusions: Low-dose regimen of q3w nab-PTX was slightly less toxic, although it did not demonstrate the same effect as the original regimen in response rate. Therefore, it is not recommended for AGC in second or later line setting. Clinical trial information: UMIN 000012701.

Response Rates of Phase 2 and Phase 3 Trials of Decitabine (DAC) in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2515-2515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussain I. Saba ◽  
Michael Lübbert ◽  
P.W. Wijermans
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Background: MDS is characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, resulting in cytopenias with dysplastic morphology of peripheral blood cells and bone marrow. Decitabine (Dacogen™ DAC) is a cytosine analog that reverses aberrant DNA methylation, leading to re-expression of silenced tumor suppressor genes. Due to the requirement for DNA synthesis and subsequent demethylation, decitabine may require prolonged administration to achieve maximum benefit. Overall response rates (ORR) (CR+PR) from 1 pivotal Phase 3 (D-0007) and 3 supportive Phase 2 trials (91–01, 95–11 and 97–19) in patients with intermediate and high risk MDS receiving DAC are being presented. Methods: The Phase 2 trials were open-label and single-arm, with a minimum of 4 treatment cycles and a maximum of 8 cycles, while the D-0007 was a 1:1 randomized comparison of DAC plus supportive care (SC) vs. SC alone, with a maximum of 10 cycles of therapy. The D-0007 study design dictated that patients be removed from therapy following 8 cycles of decitabine if CR was not achieved, and 6 cycles in the absence of PR. Patients who maintained a CR for 2 cycles were removed from therapy. Results: A total of 271 unique patients were exposed to DAC in the studies (n= 89 in D-0007, n=29 in 91–01, n = 66 in 95–11, n = 87 in 97–19). Patients receiving DAC had similar demographics and disease characteristics in all trials. Responses were observed in all IPSS and FAB subgroups. The percent of patients classified as intermediate-2 and high risk (according to the International Prognostic Scoring System) in the Phase 3 trial was 69% vs. 72% in the Phase 2 trials. By intent-to-treat analysis, the ORRs were 45%, 26%, and 26% respectively, for the Phase 2 trials. These results were corroborated in the Phase 3 trial, where the response rates were evaluated according to the more robust International Working Group MDS criteria, following a blinded, centralized bone marrow review. The D-0007 overall response rate was 17% for DAC (9% CR, 8% PR) vs. 0% for SC (p<0.001). Responses were durable, lasting a median of 266 days. The 95–11 and 97–19 response rates were also centrally reviewed, while 91–01 responses were investigator-assessed. In the 91–01 trial, the ORR was 45% (28% CR, 17% PR) with a median duration of response of 217 days, the 95–11 ORR was 26% (21% CR, 5% PR) with a median duration of 250 days, and the 97–19 ORR was 26% (22% CR, 5% PR) with a median duration of 146 days. Hematologic improvement (HI) was also evaluated according to varied criteria in conjunction with the response rates in all 4 studies; 12 patients (13%) had HI in D-0007, 2 patients (7%) in 91–01, 8 patients (12%) in 95–11, and 13 patients (15%) in 97–19. The D-0007 trial design dictated that patients who maintained a CR for 2 cycles be removed from therapy. As a result, the median number of cycles delivered was 3, with only 48% of patients receiving ≥4 cycles. In the Phase 2 studies, the median number of cycles is clearly higher (median 4), with the majority of patients receiving at least 4 cycles and approximately one-third of patients receiving ≥6 cycles. Conclusion: While response rates of ≥17% were demonstrated in these trials, the optimization of hypomethylating agents for maximum efficacy is very likely to include prolonged therapy, which may correlate with increases in response rate and duration.

A multicenter phase 2 study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in intermediate- to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (10) ◽  
pp. 4158-4163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Azra Raza ◽  
Ghulam J. Mufti ◽  
Carlo Aul ◽  
Ulrich Germing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract This multicenter phase 2 study evaluated the use of tipifarnib (R115777) in patients with poor-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; French-American-British classification). Patients (n = 82) received tipifarnib 300 mg orally twice daily for the first 21 days of each 28-day cycle. Twenty-six patients (32%) responded to tipifarnib: 12 (15%) complete responses (CRs) and 14 (17%) hematologic improvements; 37 patients (45%) had stable disease (modified International Working Group criteria, 2006). Among the 12 CRs, the median response duration was 11.5 months (range, 2.0-21.9 months), the median time to progression was 12.4 months (range, 3.9-23.8 months), and 7 were still alive at time of analysis (all > 3 years). Median overall survival was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.4-15.0). Grade 3-4 neutropenia (18%) and thrombocytopenia (32%) were the most common treatment-related adverse events; severe nonhematologic adverse events were rarely reported. In this study, durable responses and acceptable side effects were observed. Tipifarnib is an active agent for the treatment of patients with intermediate- to high-risk MDS.

Single Agent Bortezomib Is Associated with a High Response Rate in Patients with High Risk Myeloma. A Phase II Study from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2A02).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3527-3527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Lijung Zhang ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Philip R. Greipp
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Novel Therapies ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Monoclonal Protein ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: MM is an incurable disease with an anticipated overall survival ranging from months to decades. Novel therapies like bortezomib have activity in both the relapsed/refractory and up front settings. There are sparse data on whether novel therapies may overcome high risk features. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk myeloma (beta-2 microglobulin [B2M] >= 5.5., plasma cell labeling index [PCLI] >= 1, or deletion 13q) were eligible. Patients were treated with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days for 8 cycles as induction. After induction, patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every other week indefinitely. Patients relapsing on maintenance schedule resumed full induction schedule. Responses were defined by the EBMT criteria. The primary end-point was the response rate (90% power to detect a response rate of >=50% ). Results: Between March 15, 2004 and March 10, 2005, 44 patients enrolled. Among the 43 eligible patients, median age was 63; 51% were male. All had high risk disease: deletion 13q (6/41); PCLI >=1% (17/33); t(4:14) (4/27) and B2M >= 5.5 (34/43). Response data are available for 37 of the 43 eligible patients. The overall response rate was 49% (95% CI: 0.32, 0.66) (0 patients with CR, 1 VGPR, 15 PR, 2 MR, and 11 inevaluable). The response rate allowing for use of serum monoclonal protein levels when a measurable urine monoclonal protein was unavailable at follow-up was 59.5% (1 patient with CR, 1 VGPR, 18 PR, 2 MR, and 6 inevaluable). The median progression free survival is 9.4 months. Thirty-three percent of patients completed the 8 cycles of planned induction therapy and moved to maintenance. Reasons for discontinuing therapy have included progression or death (n=18), adverse events (n=6), and other (n=14). Only 12% of patients remain on active therapy: 0% of deletion 13q patients; 25% of t(4:14) and 12% each of high B2M and high PCLI patients. Of the 14 patients who entered the maintenance phase of treatment, 3 have progressed. Of these 3, 2 took re-induction, and neither responded. Median time to progression for those entering maintenance was12.4 months from the time of starting maintenance. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher included neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (31%), hyponatremia (21%), anemia (19%), thrombocytopenia (16%), fatigue (14%). Grade 1–2 sensory peripheral neuropathy occurred in 53% of patients, with only 2% having grade 3 sensory neuropathy. One patient had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. One patient died after receiving 2 doses of protocol treatment due to heart block and asystole. Updated results on the full study population will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In high risk patients, upfront bortezomib appears to result in comparable response rates to those reported for unselected cohorts of newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Continued follow-up of these patients will provide information about whether this will translate into better overall outcomes. Figure Figure

scholarly journals A phase 2 single-center study of carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 with or without low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 899-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikoletta Lendvai ◽  
Patrick Hilden ◽  
Sean Devlin ◽  
Heather Landau ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Center Study

Key Points Carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 provided a high overall response rate with a remarkable duration of response in patients with R/RMM. Nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs likely related to carfilzomib treatment included hypertension and heart failure.

A Randomized Phase 3 Study of Tipifarnib Compared to Best Supportive Care (Including Hydroxyurea) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Patients 70 Years or Older.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 439-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Wieslaw W. Jedrzejczak ◽  
Joseph Brandwein ◽  
Dominique Bourdessoule ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Tipifarnib (R115777, ZARNESTRA®) treatment resulted in complete remission among patients (pts) with AML in phase 1–2 studies. Results are reported for the multicenter, open-label study comparing tipifarnib to best supportive care (BSC), including hydroxyurea, as first line therapy in elderly pts (≥70 years) with newly diagnosed, de novo or secondary AML. Methods: A total of 457 pts who were not medically fit for or did not wish to be treated with combination chemotherapy were randomized, with stratification for age (<75 vs. ≥75 years) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS 0–1 vs. 2). Overall, 24% of pts were ≥80 year old, 28% had PS 2, 32% had unfavorable cytogenetics and 36% had AML with myelodysplasia. Tipifarnib was administered at 600 mg p.o. BID for the first 21 consecutive days, in 28-day cycles. Pts on BSC were permitted to receive hydroxyurea if clinically indicated. The primary endpoint was to compare overall survival (OS) between treatment groups, both overall and for pts with AML with myelodysplasia. Pts were treated until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent. Pts were followed after treatment termination for subsequent therapy and survival. A total of 394 events (deaths) were required to detect a hazard ratio of 0.75 for OS, with 80% power given a 2-sided significance level of 0.043 (α1). Results: At the time of this analysis, 201 (88%) of 228 pts on the tipifarnib arm and 195 (85%) of 229 pts on the BSC arm had died. With median follow-up of 539 days, the median survival was 107 days (95% CI: 85, 129 days) for the tipifarnib arm and 109 days (95% CI: 93, 136 days) for the BSC arm. The hazard ratio (tipifarnib vs. BSC) for OS was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.24). The p-value from the stratified log-rank test on OS was 0.843. The complete response (CR) rate for tipifarnib in this study (8%) was lower than that observed previously, but with a similar median duration of 8 months. In the tipifarnib arm, OS was not negatively affected by the rate of early deaths (21% for tipifarnib and 17% for BSC) or total drug-related deaths (4 pts, 2%). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were cytopenias. The rate of grade 3 or 4 infections was slightly higher on the tipifarnib arm (39% vs. 33%), as was the incidence of febrile neutropenia (16% vs. 10%). The incidence of other drug-related non-hematological grade 3–4 adverse events was low. The median duration of hospitalization was 19 days for BSC and 22 days for tipifarnib-treated pts. The rate of hospitalization for infections was not increased: 28% vs. 29% respectively. Conclusions: In this randomized study, treatment with tipifarnib did not result in an overall increased survival when compared to BSC including hydroxyurea. There was a low incidence of drug-related deaths, and severe infections or febrile neutropenia were only slightly increased.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine + cisplatin + ipilimumab in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 357-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt D. Galsky ◽  
Noah M. Hahn ◽  
Costantine Albany ◽  
Mark T. Fleming ◽  
Alexander Starodub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Immunomodulatory Effects ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ctla4 Blockade ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

357 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade, with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, has shown striking results in patients (pts) with mUC. While CTLA4 blockade has demonstrated pharmacodynamic effects in localized bladder cancer (Carthon, Clin Can Res, 2010), the role of CTLA4 blockade in mUC remains undefined. We hypothesized that chemotherapy may lead to immunogenic cell death, and other immunomodulatory effects, which could subsequently be exploited with the addition of ipilimumab. Methods: Pts with mUC received 2 cycles of gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC) alone followed by 4 cycles of GC + ipilimumab (GCIpi). The primary endpoint was % of patients alive at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate, and progression-free survival. Immune monitoring was performed at baseline, after GC alone, and after GCIpi. Results: 36 pts with mUC (median age 60; range: 33-80) were enrolled; KPS was 80%, 90% and 100% in 30%, 45%, and 25%; 58% had visceral metastases and 20% had liver metastases. Pts received a median of 5 cycles of GC (range: 1-6) and 3 doses of Ipi (range: 1-8). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (19%), anemia (25%), hyponatremia (31%), thromboembolism (11%), and renal insufficiency (19%). The most common grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events were colitis (6%), hypophysitis (3%), hyperthyroidism (1%), and rash (1%). The objective response rate is shown in the Table. Median progression-free survival is 8 months (95% CI 6.2-9.8 months). Median follow-up is 10.4 months (range: 2.8-35.3 months). The primary endpoint analysis will be mature for the meeting. GC alone had no significant impact on circulating immune cell subsets; Ipi significantly expanded circulating CD4 and CD8 T cells. Conclusions: A phased schedule of GC plus immune checkpoint blockade was feasible in pts with mUC. Ipi induced immunomodulatory effects despite concurrent chemotherapy. Survival data are not yet mature. Ongoing analyses are exploring the impact of GC alone, and GCIpi, on antigen-specific T cell immunity and correlating such findings with “outlier” survival times. Clinical trial information: NCT01524991. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document