A Randomized Phase 3 Study of Tipifarnib Compared to Best Supportive Care (Including Hydroxyurea) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Patients 70 Years or Older.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 439-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Wieslaw W. Jedrzejczak ◽  
Joseph Brandwein ◽  
Dominique Bourdessoule ◽  
...  

Abstract Tipifarnib (R115777, ZARNESTRA®) treatment resulted in complete remission among patients (pts) with AML in phase 1–2 studies. Results are reported for the multicenter, open-label study comparing tipifarnib to best supportive care (BSC), including hydroxyurea, as first line therapy in elderly pts (≥70 years) with newly diagnosed, de novo or secondary AML. Methods: A total of 457 pts who were not medically fit for or did not wish to be treated with combination chemotherapy were randomized, with stratification for age (<75 vs. ≥75 years) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS 0–1 vs. 2). Overall, 24% of pts were ≥80 year old, 28% had PS 2, 32% had unfavorable cytogenetics and 36% had AML with myelodysplasia. Tipifarnib was administered at 600 mg p.o. BID for the first 21 consecutive days, in 28-day cycles. Pts on BSC were permitted to receive hydroxyurea if clinically indicated. The primary endpoint was to compare overall survival (OS) between treatment groups, both overall and for pts with AML with myelodysplasia. Pts were treated until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent. Pts were followed after treatment termination for subsequent therapy and survival. A total of 394 events (deaths) were required to detect a hazard ratio of 0.75 for OS, with 80% power given a 2-sided significance level of 0.043 (α1). Results: At the time of this analysis, 201 (88%) of 228 pts on the tipifarnib arm and 195 (85%) of 229 pts on the BSC arm had died. With median follow-up of 539 days, the median survival was 107 days (95% CI: 85, 129 days) for the tipifarnib arm and 109 days (95% CI: 93, 136 days) for the BSC arm. The hazard ratio (tipifarnib vs. BSC) for OS was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.24). The p-value from the stratified log-rank test on OS was 0.843. The complete response (CR) rate for tipifarnib in this study (8%) was lower than that observed previously, but with a similar median duration of 8 months. In the tipifarnib arm, OS was not negatively affected by the rate of early deaths (21% for tipifarnib and 17% for BSC) or total drug-related deaths (4 pts, 2%). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were cytopenias. The rate of grade 3 or 4 infections was slightly higher on the tipifarnib arm (39% vs. 33%), as was the incidence of febrile neutropenia (16% vs. 10%). The incidence of other drug-related non-hematological grade 3–4 adverse events was low. The median duration of hospitalization was 19 days for BSC and 22 days for tipifarnib-treated pts. The rate of hospitalization for infections was not increased: 28% vs. 29% respectively. Conclusions: In this randomized study, treatment with tipifarnib did not result in an overall increased survival when compared to BSC including hydroxyurea. There was a low incidence of drug-related deaths, and severe infections or febrile neutropenia were only slightly increased.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. 1513-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Hun Kang ◽  
Soon Il Lee ◽  
Do Hyoung Lim ◽  
Keon-Woo Park ◽  
Sung Yong Oh ◽  
...  

Purpose When designing this trial, there was no evidence that salvage chemotherapy (SLC) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) resulted in substantial prolongation of survival when compared with best supportive care (BSC). However, SLC is often offered to pretreated patients with AGC for anecdotal reasons. Patients and Methods Patients with AGC with one or two prior chemotherapy regimens involving both fluoropyrimidines and platinum and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0 or 1 were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:1 to SLC plus BSC or BSC alone. Choice of SLC—either docetaxel 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or irinotecan 150 mg/m2 every 2 weeks—was left to the discretion of investigators. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Median OS was 5.3 months among 133 patients in the SLC arm and 3.8 months among 69 patients in the BSC arm (hazard ratio, 0.657; 95% CI, 0.485 to 0.891; one-sided P = .007). OS benefit for SLC was consistent in most of the prospectively defined subgroups, including age, PS, number of prior treatments, metastatic sites, hemoglobin levels, and response to prior chemotherapy. SLC was generally well tolerated, and adverse events were similar in the SLC and BSC arms. We found no median OS difference between docetaxel and irinotecan (5.2 v 6.5 months; P = .116). Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest phase III trial comparing SLC plus BSC with BSC alone in AGC. In pretreated patients, SLC is tolerated and significantly improves OS when added to BSC.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4770-4770
Author(s):  
Lugui Qiu ◽  
Weijun Fu ◽  
Zhongjun Xia ◽  
Zhengzheng Fu ◽  
Wenming Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: ATG-010 (selinexor) is a novel, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export, which blocks exportin 1. US FDA has approved selinexor plus low dose dexamethasone (Sd) to treat patients (pts) with penta-refractory MM based on the STORM study. MARCH is a single arm, Phase 2, registrational study to assess efficacy and safety of Sd in Chinese pts with RRMM. Methods: Enrolled Chinese pts were previously refractory to PI, IMiD, and last line of therapy. ATG-010 (80mg) plus dexamethasone (20mg) was administered twice weekly. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per independent review committee. The planned 82 pts would provide ~80% power to test against null hypothesis (H 0) of 15% ORR at one-sided α of 0.025 at the primary analysis, which is presented here. Results: As of 6 th May 2021, 9 (11%) of the 82 pts were still on treatment. Median follow-up was 10.6 months (mo) (range: 2.3-19.6). Median age was 60 years (39% ≥ 65yrs). Median duration from MM initial diagnosis was 3.2 years. A total of 61 pts (74.4%) had cytogenetic abnormalities (del(17p): 22.0%), 18 (22.0%) with baseline plasmacytoma, and 18 (22.0%) with creatinine clearance &lt; 60ml/min. Median number of prior regimens were 5 (range 1-16); 23 pts (28.0%) had received daratumumab (triple-class exposure), 20 pts were triple-class refractory (TCR), and10 pts (12.2%) had undergone CAR-T therapy. ORR was 29.3% (95% CI: 19.7, 40.4), rejecting H 0, including 4 VGPR (very good partial response). Median duration of response (DOR) was 4.7 mo, median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.7 mo, and median overall survival (OS) was 13.2 mo. Among 20 TCR pts, ORR was 25.0% (95% CI:8.7, 49.1), mDOR 10.2 mo, mPFS 2.9 mo, and mOS 11.9 mo. Efficacy was evident in elderly pts (≥ 65yrs), with ORR 25% (95% CI: 11.5, 43.4) and mPFS 2.8 mo. Median OS and DOR were not reached. Sd also demonstrated a similar response rate in pts with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, with an ORR of 24.6% (95% CI: 14.5, 37.3). Efficacy of Sd was generally consistent across cytogenetic risk subgroups, including del (17p) pts with ORR 22.2% (95% CI: 6.4, 47.6), mDOR 3.8mo, and mPFS 2.9 mo. The most common non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade included nausea (78%), hyponatremia (67.1%), weight loss (65.9%), decreased appetite (62.2%), asthenia (59.8%)/fatigue (15.9%), and vomiting (50.0%). The most common grade≥3 non-hematologic TEAE were hyponatremia (29.3%), pneumonia (26.8%), hypokalemia (12.2%) and asthenia (9.8%)/fatigue (2.4%). The most common grade≥3 hematologic TEAEs were anemia (57.3%), lymphopenia (76.8%), thrombocytopenia (51.2%), and neutropenia (40.2%). TESAE occurred in 54.9% of pts, with the most common being thrombocytopenia and pneumonia (14.6% each). TEAE led to death in 7 pts (8.5%). Elderly pts had no significantly increased risk of adverse events, however, given their limited physical state, drug exposure was shorter in the elderly subgroup (12.6 vs 16.1 weeks), suggesting more active supportive care is required. Conclusions: MM refractory to both IMiD and PI remains a high unmet medical need, especially in China. The MARCH study demonstrates statistically significant and clinically meaningful ORR with Sd in Chinese RRMM pts, and efficacy was consistent across subgroups, including the elderly and pts with high-risk cytogenetics. Adverse events were as expected and manageable with appropriate supportive care and dose modification. These data are compatible with the STORM study and offers a new, oral therapeutic option for MM patients. Disclosures Yu: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment. Wang: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment. Yang: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment. Yu: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment. Lynch: Antengene Therapeutics Ltd.: Current Employment.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 779-779
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Pellegrino Musto ◽  
Tommaso Caravita ◽  
Rosanna Capozzi ◽  
...  

Abstract In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the combination melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide (MPT) induces a fast tumor response with a high response rate, but evidence that this translate into improved outcome is limited. This multicenter trial compared the efficacy and the toxicity of oral MPT with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) in previously untreated patients. From January 2002 to December 2004, we randomised 255 patients, who were older than 65 years of age (median age 72). Data analysis was performed on July 2005. The MPT regimen included oral melphalan (4 mg/m2 for 7 days) and prednisone (40 mg/m2 7 days) for six four week cycles plus thalidomide (100 mg per day continuously until any sign of relapse or progressive disease) The MP regimen was as MPT without thalidomide. Patients who were not assigned to receive thalidomide were permitted to cross over to receive thalidomide after relapse or disease progression. Patients treated with MPT experienced higher response rates and a longer time to progression (primary end points) than patients who did not receive thalidomide. The overall response rate was 76% for MPT and 48% for MP alone (P&lt;0.0001), and the near complete response rates were 28% and 7%, respectively (P&lt;0.0001). Median progression free survival in the MPT and in the MP groups was 33 months and 14 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.47; P&lt;0.001). MPT increase median progression free survival by almost 19 months. The 2-yr survival rate was 82% in MPT patients and 65% in MP patients (hazard ratio, 0.68; P=0.2). In MPT group, 33 patients did not complete the 6 courses because of progression disease (9), toxicity (16), death (2), and withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up (6). In MP group, 32 patients did not complete the 6 courses because of progression disease (19), toxicity (3), death (3), and withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up (7). By looking at those patients who completed the assigned 6 cycles in both arms, the 2-yr survival rate was 90% in MPT patients and 71% in MP patients, the difference was statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.39; P&lt;0.01). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 49% of patients treated with MPT and in 25% of those treated with MP: they included thromboembolism (12% versus 2% of patients), infections (10% versus 1%), peripheral neuropathy (10% versus 1%), and hematologic toxicity (22% versus 25%) respectively. In the first 64 patients who received MPT, grade 3–4 adverse events were reported in 58% of patients. In the last 65 MPT patients, the incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events was 40%. By comparing the first cohort with the second one, thromboembolism dropped from 22% to 3% (P&lt;0.01) and neurotoxicity from 13% to 8% (P=NS), respectively. The oral MPT was superior to the standard MP in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. The adequate mangement of side effects reduced toxicity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Ravi Patel ◽  
Brian DiCarlo ◽  
David J Park ◽  
Frederic C. Kass ◽  
...  

80 Background: There is increased evidence that cancers of the upper GI tract are comprised of distinct epidemiological and molecular entities that may respond differently to anti-cancer therapy in Asian patients compared to North American patients. Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) showed clinical promise in a phase II study in Japanese patients with pre-treated metastatic gastric cancer with a disease control rate of 56% (Doi et al, JCO, 2010). This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with pre-treated metastatic gastric and esophagus cancers in a US population. Methods: Patients with advanced upper GI adenocarcinomas who experienced disease progression despite 1-2 prior regimens were treated with everolimus 10 mg PO daily. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR; CR+PR+SD). Secondary end points included progression free survival (PFS), toxicity, overall survival (OS) and translational correlatives of the mTOR pathway. Results: Of the 40 patients enrolled to date, 19 have gastric, 7 have esophagus and 14 have tumors from the GEJ. 32 patients are evaluable to date: median age of 59 (range 36-79), all patients had an ECOG of 0 or 1; 11 (34%) received 1 prior regimen and 21 (64%) received 2 prior regimens. We observed 0 responses with 44% of evaluable patients having stable disease. Median overall survival was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.2-7.6) and PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.6-2.2). 89% of all adverse events were grade 1-2, and 11% were grade 3-4. Grade 3-4 related adverse events include: fatigue (24%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (9%). Updated results of translational correlatives with the mTOR pathway will be presented. Conclusions: We did not achieve the same degree of overall survival or disease control as in the Japanese study which may reflect differences in the locations of the primary tumor or underlying geographic variation. However, OS is significantly better than best supportive care reported in a recent randomized European trial (Thuss-Patience PC et al, Eur J Cancer 2011). Results of the randomized Phase III trial of everolimus vs best supportive care in this patient population are pending.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19150-e19150
Author(s):  
Craig H. Reynolds ◽  
Jyoti D. Patel ◽  
Edward B. Garon ◽  
Mark R. Olsen ◽  
Philip D. Bonomi ◽  
...  

e19150 Background: AAs with lung cancer (LC) have shorter survival than Caucasians (Cs). Despite a higher LC incidence among AAs than Cs (74.7 vs 64.4/100,000), AAs are underrepresented in clinical trials. There are no reports of randomized LC prospective trials reporting AA results. In POINTBREAK, we enrolled AAs at the same rate as the US incidence of NSCLC in AAs. We report efficacy/safety of AAs in both arms and efficacy/safety of AA and C within the Pem Arm. Methods: Data from AAs and Cs enrolled in POINTBREAK were analyzed. AAs in both arms were evaluated in a pre-specified analysis. Hazard ratio and p-values were derived from a multivariate Cox-PH model by adjusting stratification factors. Results: Of 939 randomized pts, 94 were AA and 805 were C. Demographics were comparable between AA/intent-to-treat populations (%): 56/53 male, 65/52 ≤65 years, 87/88 ever smoker, 86/90 stage IV, 43/44 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0. The table shows efficacy results. Among AAs, drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) include (Pem Arm %/Pac Arm %): anemia (7.3/0), thrombocytopenia (9.8/4.0), fatigue (4.9/4.0), neutropenia (31.7/44.0), febrile neutropenia (0/4.0). Within Pem Arm, drug-related grade 3/4 AEs (AA%/ C%) were anemia (7.3/15.9), thrombocytopenia (9.8/25.5), fatigue (4.9/11.5), neutropenia (31.7/25.3), febrile neutropenia (0/1.6). Conclusions: Median OS for Pem Arm was not superior to Pac Arm in AAs. Within Pem Arm, there were no significant differences between AAs and Cs for efficacy outcomes. Both regimens were tolerable in AAs. Clinical trial information: NCT00762034. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4412-4412
Author(s):  
Emma Uchida ◽  
Matthew M Lei ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
Jessie Signorelli

Abstract Background: Current literature recommends 28-day cycles of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) with continuous daily venetoclax (Ven) in select patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Key adverse events observed with azacitidine-Ven were grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia. Emerging data recommends HMA-Ven in relapsed/refractory (r/r) high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with a Ven duration ranging from 14-28 days of a 28-day cycle. Predominant grade ≥ 3 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) also included cytopenias in this patient population. As the combination of HMA-Ven for patients with MDS and AML is increasingly utilized, practice variations in the initial duration of Ven requires evaluation. This study aims to characterize the safety profile with continuous or modified duration Ven after complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) or cycle 3 to further assess the safety profile of HMA-Ven due to treatment instead of disease. Methods: This is a retrospective, single center study of patients &gt; 18 years of age with AML or MDS receiving HMA-Ven between December 1, 2017 - January 31, 2021. Patients were excluded if enrolled in an investigational protocol or received therapy at an outside hospital. To capture treatment-related neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and other safety endpoints, patients were excluded if they received &lt; 3 cycles of HMA-Ven, as cytopenias could be due to disease burden. Data was collected from day -21 until the completion of cycle 6 or last completed cycle. The primary end point was grade &gt; 3 neutropenia for &gt; 7 days. Secondary endpoints included grade &gt; 3 anemia or thrombocytopenia for &gt; 7 days, incidence of febrile neutropenia, antimicrobial use, dose interruption or delay, dose or duration modification, therapy discontinuation, and assessment of CR and CRi. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe outcomes and safety endpoints were graded with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 (CTCAE v.5.0). Results: 25 patients were included in analysis. The median age was 66 years (range 20-84) and 12% (n=3) had a diagnosis of MDS while 88% (n=22) had a diagnosis of AML. Most patients with AML had poor cytogenetic risk (n=18, 84%) and 28% (n=7) were treatment naïve. Prior therapies are outlined in Table 1. Ven was initiated with a 14-day duration in 60% (n=15) of patients, including 3 patients with MDS, 4 patients with r/r AML, and 4 patients with r/r AML with a prior allogeneic transplant. Many patients required a subsequent duration change of Ven throughout the evaluation period (n=13, 52%). Treatment delays of &gt; 7 days occurred in 60% (n=15) of patients. 12 patients (48%) achieved CR or CRi and accounted for 45 evaluated cycles. Of the 12 patients, 4 started with 28-day ven, 1 with 21-day, and 7 with 14-day. Of the patients who achieved CR or CRi, there were 32 cycles with Ven 14-day durations, 7 cycles with 21-day duration, and 6 cycles of 28-day duration. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia for &gt; 7 days was observed in 72% (n=23) of the 14-day durations and 100% of the 21-day and 28-day Ven durations. Grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia and anemia was most common in the 28-day duration Ven at 83% (n=5) and 50% (n=3), respectively. Febrile neutropenia and treatment with antibiotic therapy had higher incidence of 67% (n=4) in the 28-day Ven duration. Most patients received treatment with antibiotic therapy (75%, n=9) and antifungal therapy (67%, n=8) after achieving CR or CRi on HMA-Ven. In those with newly diagnosed AML, 29% (n=2) and 57% (n=4) achieved CR and CRi respectively. 67% (n=2) of the MDS patients and 27% (n=4) of the r/r AML population achieved CRi. Of the 9 patients with prior HMA exposure, 2 patients achieved CRi. Conclusions: There was a high incidence of grade 3 or higher cytopenias, but a trend toward increased neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and infectious complications were observed in those receiving a 21-day or 28-day Ven duration after CR or CRi compared to those receiving a 14-day duration of Ven. Early decreased durations of Ven and further decreases outside the prescribing information after patients are in CR may be a reasonable and safe option for patients who are not likely to tolerate continuous Ven, such as those with prior MDS, r/r disease, or patients who have received prior allogeneic transplant. This requires further investigation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lei: AbbVie: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Intervention Insights: Consultancy; Fresenius Kabi: Consultancy. Brunner: GSK: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Keros Therapeutics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fathi: Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Foghorn: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kura: Consultancy, Honoraria; Trillium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ipsen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Signorelli: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; AbbVie: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3984-3984
Author(s):  
Zhong Zheng ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Shu Cheng ◽  
Pengpeng Xu ◽  
Weili Zhao

A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma: An Interim Analysis Zhong Zheng1, Li Wang1,2, Shu Cheng1, Peng-Peng Xu1, Wei-Li Zhao1,2 1State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Institute of Hematology, Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China 2Pôle de Recherches Sino-Français en Science du Vivant et Génomique, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Shanghai, China Abstract Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). Rituximab plus chemotherapy for FL significantly improves the outcome of the patients, nevertheless, most patients ultimately relapse. Therefore, novel agents along with Rituximab have been applied to increase treatment efficacy in this subset of iNHL patients. Tumor immune eascape plays a crucial role in lymphoma progression. Through modulating tumor microenvironment, lenalidomide, are emerging as effective therapeutic approaches to affect tumor immunity and inhibit lymphoma cells proliferation. However, its anti-tumor activity activity has not yet been assessed in de-novo chinese FL patients. This prospective phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in combination with Rituximab (R2) in newly diagnosed FL patients (NCT 03715309). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed FL (grade 1 to 3a), aged 16 to 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 are enrolled. The doses and administration schedule are as follows: rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0, lenalidomide 25mg from day 1 to day 10 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint is complete response (CR) rate assessed by PET-CT, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and main adverse events (AEs). Results: To date, eighty-six patients have been enrolled, with median age of 48 years (range, 22-73). At diagnosis, Seventy-seven patients (89.5%) presented advanced Ann Arbor stage and 19 cases (22.0%) showed elevated serum LDH level. Twenty-nine patients (33.7%) had multiple extra-nodal sites involving bone marrow, bone, gastrointestinal, and spleen. Twenty-one patients (24.4%) had IPI scores ≥ 3. For Sixty-four patients available for response evaluation, the CR rate was 81.2% (52/64) and the ORR was 90.1% (58/64). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was found in 18 cases (20.9%). No grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3-4 anemia were observed. For non-hematological AEs, cutaneous reactions and tumor flare reaction were observed in 12 cases (13.9%) and in 1 case (1.16%), respectively, while no grade 4 non-hematological AEs were presented. Conclusion: Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab as first-line therapy for de novo patients with FL showed encouraging response and good tolerability. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 750-750
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Eto ◽  
Toshikazu Moriwaki ◽  
Hiroyasu Ishida ◽  
Shinji Endo ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
...  

750 Background: The alternate-days administration of S-1 was suggested to reduce toxicities such as GI-related adverse events (AEs) or neutropenia maintaining efficacy in some previous reports. This phase II study was aimed to evaluate an alternate-day administration of S-1 combined with bevacizumab in untreated elderly patients with mCRC. Methods: The key eligibility criteria included age ≥75 years, first-line chemotherapy, measurable lesions, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–1, preserved organ function, and refusal of oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing regimen as the initial chemotherapy. Patients received 40 mg (body surface area [BSA] ≤1.25 m2), 50 mg (BSA > 1.25 to ≤1.50 m2), or (BSA > 1.50 m2) of S-1 orally, twice a day, on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday every week. Bevacizumab of 7.5 mg/kg was administered every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Expected median PFS was 8.5 months, and efficacy threshold was 5.0 months. The required sample size was calculated as 50 patients, with a 2-sided type I error of 10% and a power of 80%. Results: Of 54 enrolled patients, 50 patients for efficacy and 53 patients for safety were evaluated. The median age was 79 years (range, 75–88), and 56% had an ECOG PS of 0. The median follow-up time was 34.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.6–44.9). Median PFS was 8.1 months (95%CI, 7.4–10.1). Median overall survival was 22.8 months (95%CI, 16.9–28.5). The response rate and disease control rate were 44% and 88%, respectively. Grade 3 or more hematologic, non-hematologic, and bevacizumab-related AEs were observed in 9%, 11%, and 25% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (11%), nausea (6%), fatigue (6%), anemia (6%), and proteinuria (6%). Treatment-related death caused by cerebral infarction was observed in one patient. Conclusions: The primary endpoint was met. The alternate-days administration of S-1 combined with bevacizumab was well tolerated and effective in elderly patients with mCRC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000010402.


Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Kenta Motomura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Wada ◽  
Yoshitaka Inaba ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a targeted antiangiogenic agent may leverage complementary mechanisms of action for the treatment of advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Avelumab is a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types; axitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3. We report the final analysis from VEGF Liver 100 (NCT03289533), a phase 1b study evaluating safety and efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib in treatment-naive patients with aHCC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eligible patients had confirmed aHCC, no prior systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, and Child-Pugh class A disease. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included safety and investigator-assessed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for HCC. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-two Japanese patients were enrolled and treated with avelumab plus axitinib. The minimum follow-up was 18 months as of October 25, 2019 (data cutoff). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 16 patients (72.7%); the most common (≥3 patients) were hypertension (<i>n</i> = 11 [50.0%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (<i>n</i> = 5 [22.7%]), and decreased appetite (<i>n</i> = 3 [13.6%]). No grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. Ten patients (45.5%) had an immune-related AE (irAE) of any grade; 3 patients (13.6%) had an infusion-related reaction (IRR) of any grade, and no grade ≥3 irAE and IRR were observed. The objective response rate was 13.6% (95% CI: 2.9–34.9%) per RECIST 1.1 and 31.8% (95% CI: 13.9–54.9%) per mRECIST for HCC. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Treatment with avelumab plus axitinib was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with aHCC.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Saad Ullah Malik ◽  
Nazma Hanif ◽  
Priyanka Kumari ◽  
Khadija Noor Sami ◽  
Chase Warner ◽  
...  

Introduction: During recent years there has been a boom in the availability of treatments for multiple myeloma (MM). Based on the status of disease (newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory), several regimens have successfully improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these two types of patients. Triple drug regimen is considered the current standard of care for newly diagnosed MM patients. However, with the advent of four drug regimens, some studies demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS and OS compared to standard of care where as others showed marginal to no difference. Also, it remains unclear whether the benefits of using four drug regimen outweigh the risks. Thus, the aim of our meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of four drug versus three drug regimens among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Methods: We built a PICO based search strategy using keywords like "multiple myeloma", "randomized clinical trials" and ran literature search on PubMed, Embase, Wiley Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov ranging from the date of inception till 16th July, 2020. A pre-validated data extraction sheet was used to extract data on PFS, OS and ≥Grade 3 hematologic adverse events at the longest follow-up. We included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing four versus three drug regimen in newly diagnosed MM patients. We excluded studies other than RCTs, studies conducted on relapsed refractory MM patients or other plasma cell dyscrasias. A generic variance weighted random effects model (DerSimonian and Laird) was used to derive hazard ratio estimates along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS and OS. Risk ratio along with its 95% CIs was estimated for Grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q -statistic and was quantified with I2 test (I2 &gt;50% was consistent with a high degree of heterogeneity). A pre-specified sensitivity analysis was also performed for risk of adverse events. Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs and GRADE was used to rate the quality of evidence. Results: Initial search retrieved 7622 titles. After duplicate removal, 4880 articles were left. Following initial screening, 58 articles were considered for full text review. Of these only 3 studies (n=2277) met inclusion criteria. Four drug regimens included daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan-prednisone (D-VMP), daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide-dexamethasone (D-VTd) and bortezomib and melphalan prednisone and thalidomide (VMPT-VT) respectively. Whereas, three drug regimens were bortezomib, melphalan-prednisone (VMP), bortezomib, thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTd) and bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) respectively. There was a significant improvement in PFS when 4 vs 3 drug regimens were compared in patients with newly diagnosed MM (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.46-0.62, p-value:&lt;0.001, I2: 0%). Also, OS improved significantly in four drug regimen group (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51-0.76, p-value:&lt;0.001, I2: 3.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in any grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events when 4 vs 3 drug regimens were compared (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.93-1.73, p-value:0.14, I2: 93%). Sensitivity analysis after removing D-VTd regimen from any grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events revealed similar results (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.97-1.13, p-value:0.23, I2: 23%) confirming the robustness of analysis. When each hematologic adverse event was looked at separately, there was no difference between 4 vs 3 drug regimen in rates of anemia (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.76-1.28, p-value:0.92, I2: 0%), neutropenia (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00-1.94, p-value:0.05, I2: 85%) and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.92-1.39, p-value:0.24, I2: 33%). There was low risk of bias and strength of evidence was of moderate. Conclusion: Using four drug regimens, compared to three drug regimens, significantly improves PFS and OS among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients without any difference in the risk of ≥3 grade hematologic adverse events. Further randomized clinical trials are required to establish four drug regimen as standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document