Outcomes for Hispanic Patients with Acute Leukemia Treated at Academic Centers

Abstract Introduction: Health disparities for underrepresented U.S. minority populations with hematologic cancers contribute to differential treatment and higher death rates. The Hispanic population (including people of Mexican, South/Central American, Cuban, Puerto Rican, or other Spanish-speaking cultures, regardless of race) collectively constitutes the largest minority group in the United States. Hispanic patients have been reported to have an increased incidence of B-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-ALL) and acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). While APL is associated with favorable outcomes compared to other acute leukemias, registry data suggest poorer outcomes in Hispanic patients with both acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The Hispanic paradox is an epidemiological paradox that refers to the finding that Hispanic patients have paradoxically comparable, or better, health outcomes compared to their U.S. non-Hispanic White counterparts despite barriers to care such as lower socioeconomic status. This paradox has also been reported in hematologic malignancies. Definitive data regarding differences in outcome between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with acute leukemias (AL) are lacking. We sought to compare outcomes of Hispanic patients and non- Hispanic patients with acute leukemia with access to care, and examine whether the Hispanic paradox reported in hematologic malignancies is attributable to enrichment of patients with highly curable disease such as APL. Methods: Using data from a Vizient Clinical Data Base, a healthcare claims database, we identified patients with leukemia using ICD 10 codes for acute leukemia. Adult patients with AL, ages 18-89 who were treated between January 2020 and June 2021 were evaluated. Data from 121 academic centers was included. We focused on academic centers to limit the impact of access to care . Demographic information was obtained from the registry, to which ethnicity was self-reported. Patients were stratified by age, and we compared complication rates, number of complications, number of deaths, percent deaths and mortality index between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. The key metric used to compare outcomes of Hispanic patients with non-Hispanic patients was the severity adjusted mortality index, which is the ratio of observed mortality over expected mortality for patients with the same diagnosis in this registry. Chi-squared test is used for to determine the statistical significance of differences in mortality (by age group) in Hispanics v. non-Hispanic patients. Initial analysis included all patients with acute leukemias, and the data was subsequently reanalyzed excluding patients with APL, as APL is known to portend a favorable prognosis. Results: A total of 29,967 patients were with acute leukemia were evaluated; of these patients, 2903 identified as Hispanic and 27,064 were non- Hispanic. As seen in table 1, patients of Hispanic origin generally had lower treatment related complication rates in all age groups compared to their age matched non-Hispanic counterparts. Except for the 51-64 and 80-84 age groups the mortality index was lower in Hispanic patients compared to non-Hispanic peers. Differences in mortality between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients in all age groups were not statistically significant. Trends to a lower mortality index in Hispanic patients are highlighted in green in table 1. When patients with APL were excluded from the analysis, the trend lower mortality in Hispanic patients in most age groups persisted. Again, the mortality index was comparatively higher in hispanic patients in the 51-64 and 80-84 age groups, but differences in mortality between Hispanic and non- Hispanic patients were not statistically significant. Exclusion of APL patients did not have a significant impact on the complication rate or mortality supporting that the Hispanic paradox is independent of higher rates of very favorable risk myeloid malignacies in this population. Conclusions: Hispanic patients with access to academic cancer centers have the potential for non-inferior outcomes compared to non-Hispanic patients. Equivalent outcomes as assessed by mortality index were not attributable solely to the higher incidence of very favorable risk disease such as APL in the Hispanic population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Watts: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Rafael Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy. Bradley: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Sekeres: Takeda/Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Survival Outcomes of Leukemias and Myelodysplastic Syndromes Occurring As Second Cancers in the United States: A SEER Registry-Based Population Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2507.2507 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2507-2507 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Paul Elson ◽

Aaron T. Gerds ◽

Hetty E. Carraway ◽

Anjali S. Advani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

The United States ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Leukemias ◽

Second Cancers ◽

Better Than

Abstract Introduction Population level data about the survival outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies occurring as second cancers is limited. We undertook one of the largest analyses of second hematologic malignancies (SHM) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology & End Results (SEER) registry to identify factors associated with survival. Methods SEER 9 &13 registries were queried to identify adult patients (pts>18 years) diagnosed with SHM that comprised of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Lymphoid Leukemia (ALL), Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) & Other Acute Leukemias (OAL, biphenotypic leukemias, myeloid sarcomas & leukemias NOS) > 1 year (yr) after diagnosis of a primary unrelated cancer, using ICD-O-3 codes over a 40 yr period (1973-2012). Data on demographics, follow up, primary tumor & survival were abstracted. Univariate & multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors influencing survival of SHM & compared with hematologic malignancies occurring as first cancers. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported & significance was set at p< 0.01. Results SHM cases included 4665 AML, 3569 MDS, 1140 OAL, 1076 CML & 536 ALL pts. Median age at diagnosis of SHM was 73 yrs (range, 18-100) for AML, 79 yrs (18-100) for MDS, 74 yrs(20-99) for OAL, 74 yrs(18-98) for CML & 70 yrs(19-97) for ALL. Pts>60 yrs comprised 79.2% of AML, 92% of MDS, 88.7% of OAL, 82.9% of CML & 75.2% of ALL cases. Gender distribution was similar across all categories, with females comprising 48.5% of AML, 42.2% of MDS, 45.3% of OAL, 42.8% of CML & 50.2% of ALL cases. More than 85% of pts in each group were Caucasians. While the majority of pts had one primary unrelated cancer (82-89%), 14% of AML pts, 17.8% of MDS pts, 13.8% of OAL, 15.3% of CML pts& 10.6% of ALL pts had >1 primary unrelated cancer. Most common primary sites were prostate (19.1-29.6%), breast (16.1-21.9%) & colorectal (9.3-14.5%). Median survival (range) was as follows: AML 0.2 yrs (0-28.2); MDS 1.5 yrs (0-14); OAL 0.2 yrs (0-29.1); CML 2.5 yrs (0-27.1); & ALL 0.7 yrs (0-28.8). Median latency periods (range) for secondary cancers were as follows: AML 5.2 yrs (1.0-24.2); MDS 7.6 yrs (1.0-35.5); OAL 5.7 yrs (1.0-=34.3); CML 5.2 yrs (1.0-31.6); & ALL 6.2 yrs (1.0-35.5). In univariable analyses, age <60 yrs predicted for better survival (p<0.0001) for all SHM, as did diagnosis in recent yrs (2001-2012) (p< 0.0001 for AML, OAL, CML & ALL). Effect of time period on survival for MDS was not done, as it became formally reportable in 2001. Having >2 primaries was associated with an unfavorable outcome for subsequent AML (HR=1.15; 1.08-1.23; p < 0.0001), MDS (HR=1.13; 1.05-1.22: p=0.001) & CML (HR=1.30; 1.13-1.48: p=0.0002). In multivariable analyses, advancing age was an independent adverse prognostic factor for all secondary leukemias & MDS, both as a continuous variable & when categorized as <60 yrs vs. >60 yrs (p<0.001). Race & gender did not impact survival. Using breast cancer as a referent primary, AML pts had worse outcomes following colorectal (HR=1.31; 1.14-1.5; p=0.0002) or lung (HR=1.46; 1.22-1.74; p< 0.0001) primaries, while MDS pts fared worse with prior lung (HR=1.61; 1.22-2.12; p=0.0007) or Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR=1.58; 1.3-1.92: p< 0.0001). Of all 2ndCML cases, those after colorectal cancer had worst survival (HR=1.54; 1.12-2.13; p=0.008). Among SHM pts, MDS pts had better survival than those with AML (HR=0.42; 0.4-0.44: p< 0.0001), as did pts with CML (HR=0.37; 0.35-0.41: p< 0.0001) & ALL (HR=0.64; 0.58-0.70; p< 0.0001). Out OAL had similar outcomes compared to AML (HR=0.99; 0.92-1.05; p=0.66). Pts with CML fared better than MDS (HR=0.47; 0.41-0.54; p< 0.0001) & OAL (HR=0.37; 0.34-0.41: p< 0.0001). Pts with ALL had worse survival than CML (HR=1.8; 1.6-2.03: p< 0.0001) & MDS (HR=1.28; 1.11-1.48: p=0.0005), but better than OAL (HR=0.65; 0.58-0.73: p< 0.0001). (Figure 1) Patients with all SHM, except CML, had worse outcomes compared to those with primary hematologic cancers (Figure 2). Conclusion The prolonged latencies for SHM in this study suggest that they are likely therapy-related. Our findings show that type & number of primary cancers influence survival of subsequent leukemias & MDS. SHM have worse survival compared to those with primary hematologic malignancies except CML where non-separation of survival curves suggest that CML as SHM does not behave like a therapy-related neoplasm. Disclosures Sekeres: TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Development of Astatine-211 (211At)-Based Anti-CD123 Radioimmunotherapy for Acute Leukemias and Other CD123+ Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152105 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3341-3341

Author(s):

George S. Laszlo ◽

Johnnie J. Orozco ◽

Allie R. Kehret ◽

Margaret C. Lunn ◽

Donald K. Hamlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Leukemia Cell ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Leukemia Cell Lines ◽

Efficacy Studies

Abstract Background: Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has long been pursued to improve outcomes in acute leukemia. Of current interest are alpha-particle emitting radionuclides as they deliver a very large amount of radiation over just a few cell diameters, enabling efficient and selective target cell kill. So far, alpha-emitters including astatine-211 (211At) have been primarily explored with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting CD45 or CD33 but their broad display on non-malignant target-expressing cells can lead to marked "on-target, off tumor cell" toxicities. To overcome this limitation, we developed a novel form of 211At-based RIT targeting CD123. CD123 is displayed widely on acute leukemia cells, including underlying leukemic stem cells, but is expressed only on a discrete subset of normal hematopoietic cells and is virtually absent on non-blood cells. Methods: We immunized BALB/c mice with peptides consisting of the extracellular domain of human CD123 to generate anti-CD123 mAbs. Flow cytometry-based assays with human acute leukemia cell lines were used to characterize binding of hybridoma supernatants and mAbs to CD123. mAbs were conjugated with isothiocyantophenethyl-ureido-closo-decaborate(2-) (B10), a boron cage molecule for subsequent astatination, and were then labeled with 211At. In vivo leukemia cell targeting ("biodistribution") and efficacy studies were conducted in immunodeficient NOD-Rag1 null IL2rɣ null/J (NRG) mice xenografted with MOLM-13 cells, a CD123+ human acute myeloid leukemia cell line. Results: Based on initial hybridoma screening studies, we selected 4 mAbs (10C4, 5G4, 11F11, and 1H8) for further characterization. Phenotyping studies with CD123+ and CD123- human acute leukemia cell lines (including CD123+ cell lines in which CD123 was deleted via CRISPR/Cas9) confirmed specific binding of all mAbs to human CD123 (binding intensity: 10C4>5G4=11F11=1H8), with 10C4 yielding a higher median fluorescence intensity than the widely used commercial anti-CD123 mAb clones, 7G3 and 6H6 (Figure 1). In vitro internalization with a panel of human acute leukemia cell lines studies demonstrated uptake of all mAbs by CD123+ target cells with a kinetic slower than that for anti-CD33 antibodies (typically, 30-50% of the anti-CD123 mAb internalized over 2-4 hours). All 4 anti-CD123 mAbs could be conjugated to B10 and subsequently labeled with 211At. Unlike a non-binding 211At-labeled control mAb, 211At-labeled anti-CD123 mAbs showed uptake at MOLM-13 flank tumors in NRG mice carrying MOLM-13 xenografts. After additional leukemia cell targeting studies to optimize the dosing of 10C4, we conducted proof-of-concept efficacy studies in NRG mice injected intravenously with luciferase-transduced MOLM-13 cells (disseminated leukemia model). Animals were either untreated or treated with 10 µCi, 20 µCi, or 40 µCi of 211At-labeled 10C4-B10 mAb (9-11 animals/group). This was followed by the infusion of bone marrow cells from donor mice as stem cell support 3 days later. As shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, 211At-10C4-B10 led to a dose dependent decrease in tumor burden. Further, the treatment significantly prolonged survival compared to untreated animals (median survival: 49 days [40 µCi of 211At] vs. 31 days [10 µCi of 211At] vs. 21 days [Ctrl]; P<0.0001 for Ctrl vs. 10 µCi, P<0.004 for 10 µCi vs. 40 µCi), demonstrating potent in vivo anti-leukemia efficacy of a single dose of 211At-CD123 RIT. Conclusion: Our data support the further development of 211At-CD123 RIT for the treatment of patients with acute leukemia and other CD123+ hematologic malignancies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Green: Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Cellectar Biosciences: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSSEN Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Neoleukin Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; SpringWorks Therapeutics: Research Funding. Walter: Kite: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy, Other: ownership interests; Selvita: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Molecular and Immunophenotypic Characteristics of Adult Acute Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1659.1659 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1659-1659 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Bhumika Patel ◽

Caner Saygin ◽

Bartlomiej P Przychodzen ◽

Cassandra M. Hirsch ◽

Michael J. Clemente ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Leukemia ◽

Progenitor Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Normal Karyotype ◽

Molecular Profiling ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Precursor Lesions ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Leukemias ◽

Normal Cytogenetics

Abstract Acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL) and mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) are acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage representing less than 5% of all adult leukemias. Ontogenetically, they are thought to be caused by precursor lesions in early pluripotent hematopoietic progenitor cells having the ability to differentiate into both lymphoid and myeloid lineages. In contrast, common lymphoid and myeloid leukemias are likely derived from precursor lesions in committed progenitor cells. The molecular characteristics of the cell of origin of these leukemias have not been fully characterized. Given the ambiguous classification of these disorders, we used NGS to evaluate the molecular profiles of this unique subset of leukemias. Our panel tested for the 60 most commonly mutated genes in myeloid malignancies (MM), which can be used to further elucidate driver mutations that play a role in the pathogenesis of this unique entity. Molecular data was available for 18 of 35 patients (pts) (51%), of whom 8 were T/myeloid, 7 were B/myeloid, and 3 were AUL. 14 pts out of the 18 had samples at the time of initial diagnosis, 3 AUL cases harbored mutations commonly seen in MM, including one patient with DNMT3A and a germ line JAK3 mutation, another with U2AF1 and PHF6 mutations, and one pt with SF3B1 and MECOM mutations. Of the 5 B/myeloid cases, 4 had only one mutation detected by the sequencing panel, including TET2, PTPN11, KDM6A, and PHF6, and one had no mutations, but did have complex cytogenetics. Of interest, we identified four patients with T/myeloid MPAL that harbored a FLT3-ITD mutation. Notably, one of these cases had additional DNMT3A and TET2 mutations while another case had a WT1 mutation. We assert that the mutational data for MPAL supports that T-myeloid MPAL encompasses a borderland between early T precursor (ETP)-ALL/AML in addition to more typical cases of T-ALL/AML given its similar immunophenotype to ETP ALL (CD117, CD13 and CD33 positive). The overlap between these two entities is illustrated in the figure below. With this immunophenotyping and molecular profiling we propose a new provisional entity, ETP-myeloid MPAL in addition to already existing ETP ALL. Of 1250 pts with acute leukemia diagnosed from 1997-2016 at Cleveland Clinic, 35 had immunophenotypic characteristics of ambiguous leukemia based on WHO criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 50 years, and 22 (63%) were male. There were 31 MPAL (16 T/myeloid, 15 B/myeloid) and 4 AUL cases. Among the 31 MPAL patients, 2 were mixed lineage chimera (subclones), and 29 had true biphenotypic features. 48% of the cohort had normal cytogenetics at diagnosis, 23% had other cytogenetic abnormalities, 14% had complex karyotype, 9% had MLL gene rearrangement, and 6% had t(9;22). 62% of pts were treated with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) directed induction chemotherapy (IC), while 38% were treated with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) directed IC. Rates of complete remission (CR) were significantly higher in pats treated with ALL-IC regimen (82%) versus AML-IC regimen (23%) (p=.003). In our study, two cases with the recurrent lymphoid mutations WT1 and KDM6A, that achieved CR with upfront ALL-IC, while one case with FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, and TET2 mutations achieved CR with AML-IC treatment. Pts <40 yrs of age had significantly better median OS (41 months) than patients over 40 yrs old (16 months) (p=0.03). MPAL pts with normal cytogenetics had worse median OS (16 months) compared to any other cytogenetic group (25 months) (p=.05). In conclusion, clinical evaluations of ambiguous leukemias demonstrate that those with normal karyotype have the worst outcome of all pts diagnosed with MPAL. This can be partly explained by mutations that are detected at the time of diagnosis such as FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A, which have been associated with poor survival in AML with normal karyotype. Identification of actionable targets like FLT3-ITD can improve clinical outcomes for this subset of patients prior to BMT or for those ineligible for BMT. The existence of a unique subset of pts with immunophenotypic overlap between ETP-ALL/AML, that were classified in routine practice as T/myeloid leukemia, are important to recognize due to their unique actionable phenotype. Molecular profiling of these cases identified gene mutations more akin to MM. We propose that sequencing may play an important role in optimizing the therapeutic approach for patients with ambiguous lineage leukemia. Figure Figure. Disclosures Carraway: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results from the Connect® MM Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126205 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3129-3129

Author(s):

Hans C. Lee ◽

Sikander Ailawadhi ◽

Cristina Gasparetto ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Robert M. Rifkin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Causes Of Death ◽

Age Groups ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Age Group ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is common among the elderly, with 35% of patients (pts) diagnosed being aged ≥75 years (y). With increasing overall life expectancy, the incidence and prevalence of newly diagnosed and previously treated MM patients ≥80 y is expected to increase over time. Because elderly pts are often excluded from clinical trials, data focused on their treatment patterns and clinical outcomes are lacking. The Connect® MM Registry (NCT01081028) is a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of pts with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) designed to examine real-world diagnostic patterns, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and health-related quality of life patient-reported outcomes. This analysis reviews treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly pts from the Connect MM Registry. Methods: Pts enrolled in the Connect MM registry at 250 community, academic, and government sites were included in this analysis. Eligible pts were adults aged ≥18 y with symptomatic MM diagnosed ≤2 months before enrollment, as defined by International Myeloma Working Group criteria; no exclusion criteria were applied. For this analysis, pts were categorized into 4 age groups: <65, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and ≥85 y. Pts were followed from time of enrollment to the earliest of disease progression (or death), loss to follow-up, or data cutoff date of February 7, 2019. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics and treatment regimens. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression. Time to progression (TTP) analysis excluded causes of death not related to MM. Results: Of 3011 pts enrolled (median age 67 y), 132 (4%) were aged ≥85 y, and 615 (20%) were aged 75-84 y at baseline. More pts aged ≥85 y had poor prognostic factors such as ISS stage III disease and reduced hemoglobin (<10 g/dL or >2 g/dL <LLN) compared with other age groups, although no notable differences between creatinine and calcium levels were observed across age groups (Table). A lower proportion of elderly pts (75-84 and ≥85 y) received triplet regimens as frontline therapy. More elderly pts received a single novel agent, whereas use of 2 novel agents was more common in younger pts (Table). The most common frontline regimens among elderly pts were bortezomib (V) + dexamethasone (D), followed by lenalidomide (R) + D, whereas those among younger pts included RVD, followed by VD and CyBorD (Table). No pt aged ≥85 y, and 4% of pts aged 75-84 y received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (vs 61% in the <65 y and 37% in the 65-74 y age group). The most common maintenance therapy was RD in pts ≥85 y (although the use was low) and R alone in other age groups (Table). In the ≥85 y group, 27%, 10%, and 4% of pts entered 2L, 3L, and 4L treatments respectively, vs 43%, 23%, and 13% in the <65 y group. Progression-free survival was significantly shorter in the ≥85 y age group vs the 75-84 y age group (P=0.003), 65-74 y age group (P<0.001), and <65 y age group (P<0.001; Fig.1). TTP was significantly shorter in the ≥85 y group vs the <65 y group (P=0.020); however, TTP was similar among the 65-74 y, 75-84 y, and ≥85 y cohorts (Fig. 2). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the ≥85 y group vs the 75-84 y, 65-74 y, and <65 y groups (all P<0.001; Fig. 3). The mortality rate was lowest (46%) during first-line treatment (1L) in pts aged ≥85 y (mainly attributed to MM progression) and increased in 2L and 3L (47% and 54%, respectively); a similar trend was observed in the younger age groups. The main cause of death was MM progression (29% in the ≥85 y vs 16% in the <65 y group). Other notable causes of death in the ≥85 y group included cardiac failure (5% vs 2% in <65 y group) and pneumonia (5% vs 1% in <65 y group). Conclusions: In this analysis, elderly pts received similar types of frontline and maintenance regimens as younger pts, although proportions varied with decreased use of triplet regimens with age. Considering similarities in TTP across the 65-74 y, 75-84 y, and ≥85 y cohorts, these real-world data support active treatment and aggressive supportive care of elderly symptomatic pts, including with novel agents. Additionally, further clinical studies specific to elderly patients with MM should be explored. Disclosures Lee: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline plc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ailawadhi:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Cellectar: Research Funding. Gasparetto:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed . Jagannath:AbbVie: Consultancy; Merck & Co.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Rifkin:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy. Narang:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Terebelo:Celgene: Honoraria; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau; Newland Medical Asociates: Employment. Toomey:Celgene: Consultancy. Hardin:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wagner:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; American Cancer Society: Other: Section editor, Cancer journal. Omel:Celgene, Takeda, Janssen: Other: Patient Advisory Committees. Srinivasan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:TechData: Consultancy. Dhalla:Celgene: Employment. Agarwal:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Abonour:BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125449 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2609-2609

Author(s):

Muhned Alhumaid ◽

Georgina S Daher-Reyes ◽

Wilson Lam ◽

Arjun Law ◽

Tracy Murphy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Age Groups ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Behavior

Introduction: Clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are rarely reported as an isolated subgroup. Treatments vary little across age groups, and treatment intensity depends upon comorbid conditions and performance status. Optimal treatment strategies focused on disease behavior, biological factors, and the distinct needs of this subset of AML patients remain elusive. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine the characteristics and outcomes of AYA AML patients treated at a specialized adult leukemia cancer center in comparison to older adults with AML (40-60 years). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2008-2018. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were recorded for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and the impact of covariates were assessed using the Log-rank test. Finally, we compared the outcomes of AYA patients treated at our centre between 2015-2018 with older patients. Results: A total of 175 patients aged 18-39 were identified. Patient characteristics are shown in (Table 1). Cytogenetic were available in 163 patients. Based on MRC criteria, 27 (16%) were favorable risk, intermediate in 95 (54%), adverse in 39 (22%), and missing/failed in 14(8%). NPM1 status was available in 110 patients of whom 38 (35%) were positive. FLT3-ITD was available in 67 patients with 24 (36%) positive. Both mutations were present in 13 (54%) patients. There were no significant differences in terms of risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular markers based on age (18-29 vs.30-39) (P= 0.98). Most patients 172 (98%) received induction, 157 (91%) with 3+7, and 15 (9%) with FLAG-IDA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 133 (77%) after first induction [120 (76%) after 3+7 and 11 (73%) after FLAG-IDA]. Induction related mortality was low (2%). Of the 39 who did not achieve CR, thirty-four patients received re-induction (13 FLAG-IDA, 16 NOVE-HiDAC, 5 others) with CR in 21 (62%). Overall, 154 (89.5%) achieved CR1. Sixty-four (42%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in CR1. 59 (38%) patients relapsed in CR1 with 8 (12%) relapsing post HSCT. Fifty-five (5 post HSCT) patients received reinduction with 30 (51%) (2 after HSCT) achieving CR2. Fifteen patients received HSCT in CR2. OS and DFS at 2 years were 62% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and 50% (95% CI 0.41-0.57), respectively. Stratified by cytogenetic risk, OS was 81% for favorable risk, 61% for intermediate, and 50% for adverse risk (P=0.0001), respectively. DFS in these groups was 85%, 57%, and 46 % (P=0.0025), respectively. We further compared outcomes in the 18-29y and 30-39y age groups. The OS was 61.9% compared to 62.5% (P=0.91) and DFS of 52.1% compared to 47% (P=0.65) respectively. On univariate analysis for OS and DFS, cytogenetic risk stratification was the only significant variable (P=0.0004 and P=0.0042). We then compared the outcomes 67 sequential patients aged I8-39 treated from 2014-2018, with those of 176 sequential patients aged 40-60 treated during the same period (table 2). OS at 2 years was not statistically higher in the younger group compared to the older group (66.7% vs. 61.2%, P=0.372). While relapse rate was lower in older patients (15.5% vs. 22.6%, P=0.093), NRM was higher in older patients (29.7% vs. 18.8%,P=0.094). Conclusion: AYA pts. occupy a unique niche amongst AML as a whole. While treatment responses have improved in general, there may be potential for further gains in these patients. Increased tolerance for more intense treatment strategies as well as the incorporation of novel agents into standard treatment protocols may provide a means to optimize care in AYA patients. Finally, research is needed to elucidate biological mechanisms and predictors of disease behavior instead of arbitrary, age-stratified treatment schema. Disclosures McNamara: Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Schimmer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Modern views on the treatment of acute leukemia in children under 1 year

Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology ◽

10.21682/2311-1267-2019-6-2-11-19 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 11-19

Author(s):

O. V. Paina ◽

E. V. Semenova ◽

I. V. Markova ◽

L. S. Zubarovskaya ◽

B. V. Afanasyev

Keyword(s):

Acute Leukemia ◽

Age Groups ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Disease Stage ◽

High Risk Infant ◽

Acute Leukemias ◽

Mll Gene ◽

The Usa ◽

Independent Risk Factors ◽

The Difference

Acute leukemias in children aged under 1 year has different clinical manifestations as compared to patients of older age groups. The prognostic values of ALL and AML in children under 1 year are different. In ALL there are additional independent risk factors which worsen the prognosis. Clinical researches in the field of infant acute leukemia is still under develop and making a significant contribution to the understanding of the biology of leukemogenesis and therapy. The results of therapy in different research groups were comprised: POG, CCG, COG (USA), JPLSG (Japan), Interfant (BFM, researchers from New Zealand, Australia and the USA). The difference of the results led to discrepancy regarding the role of allo-HSCT in the infants treatment. In Raisa Gorbacheva Memorial Research Institute of Children Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, the 10-year OS after allo-HSCT in the pediatric group with high-risk infant leukemias was 55 %, in the group of patients with restructuring of the MLL gene – 53 % versus 59 % without MLL gene. The results of allo-HSCT depended on the disease stage at the time of treatment, in I–II CR 5-year OS was 79 % (n = 35), in III–IV CR or progression –16 % (n = 20).

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of Dual PI3K and DNA PK Inhibitor, BR101801 in Adult Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149927 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3562-3562

Author(s):

Tae Min Kim ◽

Dok Hyun Yoon ◽

Ahmad H. Mattour ◽

Jorge M. Chaves ◽

Emily Curran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Dose Range ◽

Human Study ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Dose Titration ◽

Dependent Manner ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: BR101801 not only blocks the signaling responsible for cell growth caused by PI3K, but also efficiently induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through inhibition of DNA-PK activation and stimulates decreasing stability of the oncogenic protein, c-Myc(AACR2020 abstract #655). This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary activity of the BR101801 (PI3Kγ/δ and DNA PK inhibitor) in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Method: This is a Phase I, multi-center, open-label, first-in-human study. The Phase Ia (dose escalation) part of the study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of BR101801. BR101801 was administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles. The dose escalation part was initiated with a dose titration in the initial cohort, followed by a 3 + 3 design. Results: 11 patients were enrolled and have been treated at 4 dose levels: 50mg, 100mg, 200mg, 325mg and expanded 200mg through fifth cohort escalation. Pathological subtypes include 7 PTCL, 2 DLBCL, 1 MZBL and 1 composite CTCL/MF. 3 females and 8 males have been treated to date. Median age is 58 (range 30-71) and ECOG PS is in the range of 0-1. All patients had taken at least one prior chemotherapy. 10 of total patients have completed at least one cycle except 1 premature drop-out case due to disease progression. First interim analysis after completion of cycle 3 of the last patient of 200mg QD cohort had been conducted, which was to include 5 patients (1 DLBCL and 4 PTCLs). No DLT had been identified in Cohorts 1-3, and 2 patients discontinued the study treatment due to adverse event (G4 thrombocytopenia, not related to IP) and disease progression, respectively. The PK values from multiple dosing range of 50mg to 200mg cohort resulted in an approximate 2.92-fold and 4.97 fold increase in exposure based on Cmax and AUCtau, respectively. BR101801 PK profile showed that the exposure of concentration increased in a dose dependent manner and there was no accumulation observed in the dose range of 50mg to 200mg. 2 DLTs was observed at 325mg QD cohort. The dose was de-escalated to the previous lower dose level (200mg QD) and was expanded to 3 additional patients. The expansion cohort is ongoing at present. 2 of 11 patients had G3 skin reaction and 3 had G3 hepatotoxicites. All adverse effects were manageable and recovered to grade 0-1 upon BR1010801 discontinuation. Total 5 patients have been currently ongoing. For overall tumor response assessment, 4 SDs and 2 PRs have been obsereved. Summary/Conclusion: 200 mg QD of BR101801 was shown to provide target exposure for clinical efficacy with the tolerable and safe profiles. BR101801 was well tolerated and showed preliminary signs of activity in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. The phase Ib/II study of BR101801 is warranted in relapsed/refractory NHL. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04018248. Disclosures Kim: AstraZeneca-KHIDI: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GI CELL: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hanmi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boryung: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeyondBIO: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca/MedImmune: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Curran: Servier pharmaceuticals and Amgen: Consultancy. Kim: Boryung pharmaceuticals: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Treating Acute Leukemia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multicenter Latin American Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139018 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 41-42

Author(s):

Roberta Demichelis ◽

Martha Alvarado ◽

Jule F Vasquez ◽

Nancy Delgado ◽

Cynthia Gómez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Acute Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Latin American ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Latin American Countries

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire world. Health systems have been affected in such a way that patients with diseases other than COVID-19 have suffered serious consequences. In Latin America, the disease has emerged in a fragile system with more disparities, making our patients more vulnerable. Acute leukemia patients have a high risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Various expert recommendations have emerged with the aim of minimizing the risk of COVID-19 without affecting leukemia-related outcomes. However, multiple logistical issues tangentially associated with the pandemic have also appeared, potentially limiting the quality of management of these patients. The objective of this study was to register treatment modifications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and its short-term consequences in Latin American countries. Methods We included patients older than 14 years, from 14 centers of 4 Latin American countries (Mexico, Peru, Guatemala and Panama), with the diagnosis of acute leukemia, who were on active treatment since the first case of COVID-19 was documented in each country. We documented their baseline characteristics and followed the patients prospectively until July 15, were data-cutoff for this pre-planned analysis was performed. The primary outcome was the incidence of COVID-19 disease and its complications. Secondary outcomes included treatment and consult modifications, and cause of death during the study period. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with COVID-19 and all-cause mortality. Results We recorded the information of 635 patients: 58.1% Ph-negative ALL, 25.7% AML, 9% APL and 7.2% Ph+ALL. The median age was 35 years (14-90 years); 58.8% were consideredf high-risk patients. The majority were on CR (68.3%) receiving consolidation or maintenance therapy, while 14.5% were newly diagnosed and 17.2% with relapsed/refractory disease. The majority (91.8%) were treated in centers that were also receiving COVID-19 patients, 40.2% in centers were patients could not be electively hospitalized for leukemia treatment because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-pandemic led to treatment-modifications in 40.8% of the cases. Reasons for modifications were associated with logistical issues (22.4%), medical decisions (15.1%) or patient choice (3.3%). The most frequent modification was chemotherapy delay (17.3%) followed by regimen modification (13.4%) and dose-reductions (10.1%). (Figure 1) 83 patients (13.1%) developed COVID-19 disease, the majority mild-moderate disease (54.2%), 27.7% severe disease and 18.1% critically ill; 27.7% required mechanical ventilation and 37.7% died from COVID-19 disease, representing 4.9% of the entire cohort. We identify as risk factors for COVID-19 disease the presence of active leukemia (newly diagnosed or relapsed) (OR 3.46 [95% CI: 2.16-5.5], p<0.001), high-risk leukemia (OR 1.63 [95% CI: 1.54-4.52], p<0.001) and being treated in a center were elective hospitalization was possible (OR 2.17 [95% CI 1.29-3.67], p=0.004). Treatment modifications, appointment prolongations or the use of virtual consultation were not associated with a reduction in the risk of COVID-19. On the other hand, 16.7% of patients died during period analyzed due to leukemia (57.5%), COVID-19 (29.2%) or treatment related-mortality (13.2%). Independent factors associated with mortality were AML vs. ALL (OR 1.89 [95% CI: 1.12-3.18], p=0.016), relapsed-refractory disease (OR 8.34 [95% CI: 4.83-14.41], p<0.001), induction/consolidation vs. maintenance therapy (OR 2.20 [95% CI: 1.25-3.18], p<0.001) and the use of virtual consultation (OR 0.35 [95% CI: 0.13-0.94] p=0.037). (Table 1) Discussion/Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant modifications in the standard of care treatment of patients with acute leukemia. The incidence of COVID-19 disease in acute leukemia patients was considerable and more than a third of the patients with acute leukemia and COVID-19 disease died. Despite a short-follow up, 16.7% of the patients died and leukemia-related deaths were the most frequent. In low- and middle-income countries with fragile health systems, the collateral damage for patients with acute leukemia may be just as important as the direct consequences of COVID-19. Disclosures Alvarado: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. De la Peña-Celaya:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Perez:Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Gomez-Almaguer:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Tumor Mutational Burden and PD-L1 Expression in Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134375 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 15-17

Author(s):

Sean D Thomas ◽

Ah-Reum Jeong ◽

Patrick J Sakowski ◽

Ethan S Sokol ◽

Razelle Kurzrock ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Tumor Cells ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽

Checkpoint Blockade ◽

Private Company ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutational Burden ◽

Tumor Mutational Burden

Introduction: The activity of immune checkpoint blockade including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4 and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 monoclonal antibodies in hematologic malignancies is limited outside of classical Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) are well-established biomarkers predicting response to checkpoint blockade in solid malignancies. In addition, tumors with high TMB, defined as ≥10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb), and/or MSI-H are Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved tissue agnostic biomarkers for treatment with pembrolizumab. The frequencies of high TMB, MSI-H, and expression pattern of PD-L1 across specific hematologic malignancies are undefined. Methods: Patients with hematologic malignancies who had next generation sequencing (NGS) performed by Foundation One Heme were identified. TMB and MSI were measured by NGS. TMB was classified as high if ≥10 mut/Mb and low if <10 mut/Mb. When available, PD-L1 expression on tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was also collected. PD-L1 IHC was performed with either Ventana (SP142) PD-L1 antibody or Dako (22C3) PD-L1 antibody. Scores were classified as high (≥ 50%), low (1-49%), and negative (<1%) based on the percent of tumor cells staining positive for PD-L1. Pathology reports were retrospectively re-reviewed to determine the diagnosis. Results: A total of 390 patients with hematologic malignancies with NGS were identified. Forty eight of the 390 samples (12%) had a high TMB (Table 1). Twenty five of 45 (56%) patients with DLBCL had a high TMB (Table 2). The TMB was low in all myeloid malignancies tested. None of the 302 samples tested were MSI-H. PD-L1 IHC was performed on 86 samples. Eleven (13%) had high expression, 26 (30%) had low expression, and 49 (57%) had no expression of PD-L1 on the tumor cells (Table 1). The majority of samples with PD-L1 expression were mature lymphomas (81%). TMB and PD-L1 score had a significant linear relationship (R = 0.22,p= 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.41) (Figure 1). Conclusion: This study provides detailed characteristics of TMB, MSI status, and PD-L1 expression for hematologic malignancies. Notably, a subset of lymphomas had high TMB and/or PD-L1 expression. Biomarker driven studies of checkpoint blockade in hematologic malignancies with high TMB and/or PD-L1 expression are warranted. Disclosures Sokol: Foundation Medicine:Current Employment;Roche:Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Kurzrock:Medimmune:Research Funding;Foundation Medicine:Research Funding;Konica Minolta:Research Funding;IDbyDNA:Current equity holder in private company;Pfizer:Consultancy, Research Funding;Sequenom:Research Funding;Bicara Therapeutics, Inc.:Consultancy;Incyte:Research Funding;Takeda:Research Funding;TopAlliance:Research Funding;Boehringer Ingelheim:Research Funding;CureMatch Inc:Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Grifols:Research Funding;Guardant:Research Funding;X Biotech:Consultancy;Neomed:Consultancy;Actuate Therapeutics:Consultancy;Roche:Consultancy;Merck Serono:Research Funding;Genentech:Research Funding;Debiopharm:Research Funding;CureMetrix:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;OmniSeq:Research Funding;TD2/Volastra:Consultancy;Turning Point Therapeutics:Consultancy.Goodman:EUSA Pharma:Consultancy;Seattle Genetics:Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase I-II Study of Clofarabine-Melphalan-Alemtuzumab (CMA) Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) in Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies: Determination of MTD and Outcomes.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.197.197 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 197-197 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Koen van Besien ◽

Justin Kline ◽

Lucy A Godley ◽

Richard A. Larson ◽

Vu H. Nguyen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Renal Toxicity ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

One Year

Abstract Abstract 197 Supported by an unrestricted grant from Genzyme Corporation. Fludarabine (Flu) melphalan-alemtuzumab is a well tolerated, reduced intensity conditioning regimen for HCT. Clofarabine (Clo), a second generation nucleoside analog with excellent activity in acute leukemia, might enhance disease control over Flu. We report outcomes of a completed phase I and ongoing phase II study of CMA conditioning for allogeneic peripheral blood HCT. Tacrolimus was administered as GVHD prophylaxis. For the phase I cohort, one pt was enrolled per dose level, until the first DLT or until 2 had grade 3 toxicity. Dose level 1 consisted of: clo 10 mg/m2/day on d −7 to −3 and melphalan 100 mg/m2 on day −2. Clo was increased by 10 mg/m2/day per cohort until 40 mg/m2/day. Then, melphalan was increased by 20 mg/m2 until 140 mg/m2. Alemtuzumab was given at a fixed dose of 20 mg/day on d −7 to −3. Twelve pts were accrued in the phase I portion of whom three remain in remission at 26, 22 and 21 months. Forty pts, median age 53 (24–69), have been accrued in the phase II study of whom 16 had related and 24 unrelated donors. 20 had AML/MDS (6 refractory, 4 CR2, 9 CR1, 1 untreated MDS), 16 NHL (6 refractory, 9 chemosensitive relapse, 1 CR1) 2 CLL, 2 MPD. ASBMT risk score was high in 14, intermediate in 14, and low in 12. Performance score was 0 in 19, 1 in 17, 2 in 2, and not documented in 2 patients. The phase II dose was initiated at Clo 40 mg/m2/day x 5 days and melphalan 140 mg/m2. Twenty-four pts received this dose. Grade 3 renal toxicity occurred between day −7 and day +7 in 4 of 24 (17%) pts receiving this dose. The phase II dose was then reduced to Clo 30 mg/m2/day x 5 days and melphalan 140 mg/m2, and used to treat 16 pts. One pt with preexisting cardiomyopathy and refractory AML died during conditioning from cardiovascular failure. No grade 3 renal toxicity has been observed in this cohort and 3 pts had reversible grade 2 renal failure. Other toxicities included: gr 2–3 reversible ALT elevation between day −2 and day +5 in 8 pts; gr 2 reversible bilirubin elevation in 1 pt. No grade 3–4 hand foot syndrome or VOD occurred in this cohort. All evaluable pts engrafted. Twenty of 24 pts had full donor CD3 chimerism on day 30 and 2 had mixed donor chimerism. 11 pts had gr II aGVHD, and 3 had gr IIII/IV aGVHD. 7 have cGVHD.With a median follow-up of 313 days (19–607), 24 of 40 pts (60%) in the phase II portion of the study remain in remission. Eight have relapsed, 4 of whom have died. Eight others have died of treatment-related causes (7 after Clo 40 and 1 after Clo 30). Estimated one year survival is 72% (95%CI, 56–88) and PFS is 63% (45–81%). Neither dose of Clo (40 vs 30), donor type (MUD vs related), age (< 50 vs >50) affected outcomes. One year PFS was 56% (28–84) for NHL and 68% (46–90) for AML/MDS (P=NS). One year PFS was 43% (15–71%) for ASBMT high risk pts vs 70% (50–90%) for ASBMT low/intermediate risk pts (P=0.01; Figure 1). Conclusions: Clofarabine - melphalan - alemtuzumab conditioning induces durable remissions in a substantial fraction of patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Clo 30/Mel 140 has an excellent safety profile. Disclosures: Off Label Use: clofarabine for transplant conditioning. Kline:Genzyme corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Odenike:Genzyme corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stock:Genzyme: Research Funding.

Download Full-text