Gene Expression Patterns Identify Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Ovarian Cancer Who Are at Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1470-1470
Author(s):  
Veshana S. Ramiah ◽  
Anil Potti ◽  
Rebecca Peterson ◽  
David Harpole ◽  
Andrew Berchuck ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: VTE is the leading cause of death in patients with cancer. The 1-year survival rate in patients diagnosed with cancer at time of VTE is 12% compared to 36% in cancer patients without thrombosis. Cancer patients who develop VTE have higher mortality during hospitalization and during surgery. VTE in cancer patients portends a poorer prognosis and may indicate a more aggressive phenotype. There are, as yet, no clinical or laboratory parameters that have clinical utility in identifying this important group of patients with cancer who are at risk for developing VTE. Methods: We explored whether gene expression profiling could define phenotype-specific metagenes (aggregate patterns of gene expression) that distinguish cancer patients with and without VTE. The medical history of 95 patients with NSCLC and 37 patients with ovarian cancer was reviewed to identify patients with VTE after the initial diagnosis of cancer but not within 6 weeks of surgery. Separate sets of controls with NSCLC and ovarian cancer, respectively, were identified from the same groups, matched by age, gender and clinical stage, but without VTE for at least 2 years following the diagnosis of cancer. RNA was extracted and gene array data obtained using Affymetrix U133 GeneChips. Gene expression data was analyzed using binary regression methodologies. Results: 13/95 (13.5%) patients with NSCLC and 6/37 (16%) with ovarian cancer had VTE and met inclusion criteria. Using the metagene approach, a discriminator gene set (n=50) that differentiated patients with NSCLC and VTE from patients with NSCLC without VTE was identified. A separate discriminator gene set was identified for the ovarian cancer group. A leave-one-out cross validation performed to validate the reliability of the discriminator metagene set was 85% accurate in identifying patients with NSCLC and VTE. Similar analysis for the ovarian cancer patients was limited by the small number of patients identified. Significant biological differences were seen between the comparison groups in the NSCLC subset, including genes such as P53, VEGFC, E2F4, TFPI and EPHB2. Expression differences in the ovarian subset similarly included P53, but also included genes not seen in the NSCLC group, such as H-ras, Tissue factor and Factor X. Conclusions: Our data suggests that a genomic approach can identify patients with cancer at risk for VTE. In addition, these results also suggest that different tumor types might possess unique expression signatures associated with increased thrombotic risk.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8535-8535
Author(s):  
V. S. Ramiah ◽  
A. Potti ◽  
H. Dressman ◽  
A. Bild ◽  
R. Peterson ◽  
...  

8535 Background: VTE is the leading cause of death in patients with cancer. The 1 year survival rate in patients diagnosed with cancer at time of VTE is 12% compared to 36% in cancer patients who are free of VTE .Also, a thrombotic event in a hospitalized cancer patient leads to higher in-hospital mortality.Thus,VTE in cancer patients may indicate a more aggressive phenotype. Methods: With the overarching goal of testing the ability of genomic profiling to detect biologically and clinically significant differences in patients with cancer and VTE, using NSCLC as a proof of principle, we expanded on previous work wherein we have shown the ability of multiple gene expression patterns (‘metagenes’) to predict a thrombotic event .96 patients with NSCLC were enrolled in this study. RNA was extracted and gene array data obtained using an Affymetrix U133 2.0 plus GeneChip. The clinical history of all 96 patients was reviewed to identify patients with a definitive VTE episode after the initial diagnosis of cancer and not within six weeks of surgery.14/96 (14.5%) patients met these criteria. We then identified 14 additional patients with NSCLC matched by age, gender and clinical stage patients who did not have VTE for at least 2 years following the diagnosis of cancer. Gene expression data was analyzed using a binary regression analysis. Results: Using the metagene approach, a discriminator gene set (n = 45) that differentiated patients with NSCLC and VTE from patients with NSCLC without VTE was identified. A leave-one-out cross validation performed to further assess the reliability of the discriminator metagene set was more than 85% accurate in identifying patients with NSCLC and VTE. Also, significant biologically relevant differences were seen between the comparison groups, to include genes such as P53, VEGFC, E2F4, TFPI and EPHB2 Conclusions: Our data suggests that a genomic approach can be used to identify with NSCLC that develop VTE, while also providing information important to an understanding of the underlying biology of the association between cancer and thrombosis. We are in the process of validating these results in a prospective trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruofei Du ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Lixia Ma ◽  
Leon M. Larcher ◽  
Han Tang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The adverse reactions (ADRs) of targeted therapy were closely associated with treatment response, clinical outcome, quality of life (QoL) of patients with cancer. However, few studies presented the correlation between ADRs of targeted therapy and treatment effects among cancer patients. This study was to explore the characteristics of ADRs with targeted therapy and the prognosis of cancer patients based on the clinical data. Methods A retrospective secondary data analysis was conducted within an ADR data set including 2703 patients with targeted therapy from three Henan medical centers of China between January 2018 and December 2019. The significance was evaluated with chi-square test between groups with or without ADRs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression with backward stepwise method were applied to assess the difference of pathological characteristics in patients with cancer. Using the univariate Cox regression method, the actuarial probability of overall survival was performed to compare the clinical outcomes between these two groups. Results A total of 485 patients were enrolled in this study. Of all patients, 61.0% (n = 296) occurred ADRs including skin damage, fatigue, mucosal damage, hypertension and gastrointestinal discomfort as the top 5 complications during the target therapy. And 62.1% of ADRs were mild to moderate, more than half of the ADRs occurred within one month, 68.6% ADRs lasted more than one month. Older patients (P = 0.022) and patients with lower education level (P = 0.036), more than 2 comorbidities (P = 0.021), longer medication time (P = 0.022), drug combination (P = 0.033) and intravenous administration (P = 0.019) were more likely to have ADRs. Those with ADRs were more likely to stop taking (P = 0.000), change (P = 0.000), adjust (P = 0.000), or not take the medicine on time (P = 0.000). The number of patients with recurrence (P = 0.000) and metastasis (P = 0.006) were statistically significant difference between ADRs and non-ADRs group. And the patients were significantly poor prognosis in ADRs groups compared with non-ADRs group. Conclusion The high incidence of ADRs would affect the treatment and prognosis of patients with cancer. We should pay more attention to these ADRs and develop effective management strategies.


Life Sciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 119345
Author(s):  
Alexander Kinnen ◽  
Sven Klaschik ◽  
Claudia Neumann ◽  
Eva-Katharina Egger ◽  
Alexander Mustea ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
pp. 191-204
Author(s):  
Alpesh N. Amin ◽  
Steven B. Deitelzweig

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common complication in patients with cancer, is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrent VTE. Risk factors for VTE in cancer patients include the type and stage of cancer, comorbidities, age, major surgery, and active chemotherapy. Evidence-based guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients have been published: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized cancer patients, while the American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for surgical patients with cancer and bedridden cancer patients with an acute medical illness. Guidelines do not generally recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients during chemotherapy, but there is evidence that some of these patients are at risk of VTE; some may be at higher risk while on active chemotherapy. Approaches are needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis, and, to this end, a risk assessment model has been developed and validated. Despite the benefits, many at-risk patients do not receive any thromboprophylaxis, or receive prophylaxis that is not compliant with guideline recommendations. Quality improvement initiatives have been developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Quality Forum, and Joint Commission to encourage closure of the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in hospitalized patients. Health-care institutions and providers need to take seriously the burden of VTE, improve prophylaxis rates in patients with cancer, and address the need for prophylaxis across the patient continuum.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Alpesh N. Amin ◽  
Steven B. Deitelzweig

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common complication in patients with cancer, is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrent VTE. Risk factors for VTE in cancer patients include the type and stage of cancer, comorbidities, age, major surgery, and active chemotherapy. Evidence-based guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients have been published: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized cancer patients, while the American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for surgical patients with cancer and bedridden cancer patients with an acute medical illness. Guidelines do not generally recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients during chemotherapy, but there is evidence that some of these patients are at risk of VTE; some may be at higher risk while on active chemotherapy. Approaches are needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis, and, to this end, a risk assessment model has been developed and validated. Despite the benefits, many at-risk patients do not receive any thromboprophylaxis, or receive prophylaxis that is not compliant with guideline recommendations. Quality improvement initiatives have been developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Quality Forum, and Joint Commission to encourage closure of the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in hospitalized patients. Health-care institutions and providers need to take seriously the burden of VTE, improve prophylaxis rates in patients with cancer, and address the need for prophylaxis across the patient continuum.


Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca White ◽  
Maria Nonis ◽  
John F. Pearson ◽  
Eleanor Burgess ◽  
Helen R. Morrin ◽  
...  

Vitamin C (ascorbate) acts as an antioxidant and enzyme cofactor, and plays a vital role in human health. Vitamin C status can be affected by illness, with low levels being associated with disease due to accelerated turnover. However, robust data on the ascorbate status of patients with cancer are sparse. This study aimed to accurately measure ascorbate concentrations in plasma from patients with cancer, and determine associations with patient or tumor characteristics. We recruited 150 fasting patients with cancer (of 199 total recruited) from two cohorts, either prior to cancer surgery or during cancer chemo- or immunotherapy. A significant number of patients with cancer had inadequate plasma ascorbate concentrations. Low plasma status was more prevalent in patients undergoing cancer therapy. Ascorbate status was higher in women than in men, and exercising patients had higher levels than sedentary patients. Our study may prompt increased vigilance of ascorbate status in cancer patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21153-e21153
Author(s):  
Haruka Itakura ◽  
Alison K Holzer ◽  
Lawrence V Hofmann ◽  
Philip S Tsao

e21153 Background: Cancer patients represent 15-20% of the estimated 900,000 annual cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the U.S., and thrombotic complications are the second most frequent cause of death in patients with cancer. Currently, no predictors or method exists by which patients with cancer can be accurately risk-stratified for thrombotic risk. Methods: Twenty-four patients with stage III/IV gastrointestinal (GI) cancers were followed for six months for incident VTE in a prospective cohort study. Twenty-nine biomarkers relevant to inflammation and thrombosis were tested for ability to discriminate between age- and sex- matched cancer patients with (n=10) and without incident VTE (n=14). Results: Expression levels of VCAM-1 and MMP-1 were statistically significantly elevated in VTE cases compared with controls in a series of univariate analyses. VCAM-1 remained statistically significant in a multivariate analysis. Conclusions: These findings suggest the role of VCAM-1 as a potential predictor of VTE in patients with GI cancers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 84-95.e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rendong Yang ◽  
Jie Xiong ◽  
Defeng Deng ◽  
Yiren Wang ◽  
Hequn Liu ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e6301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Zengli Zhang ◽  
Yujie Ma ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Hu Zhao ◽  
...  

Early detection and prediction of prognosis and treatment responses are all the keys in improving survival of ovarian cancer patients. This study profiled an ovarian cancer progression model to identify prognostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer patients. Mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells (MOSECs) can undergo spontaneous malignant transformation in vitro cell culture. These were used as a model of ovarian cancer progression for alterations in gene expression and signaling detected using the Illumina HiSeq2000 Next-Generation Sequencing platform and bioinformatical analyses. The differential expression of four selected genes was identified using the gene expression profiling interaction analysis (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) and then associated with survival in ovarian cancer patients using the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset and the online Kaplan–Meier Plotter (http://www.kmplot.com) data. The data showed 263 aberrantly expressed genes, including 182 up-regulated and 81 down-regulated genes between the early and late stages of tumor progression in MOSECs. The bioinformatic data revealed four genes (i.e., guanosine 5′-monophosphate synthase (GMPS), progesterone receptor (PR), CD40, and p21 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A)) to play an important role in ovarian cancer progression. Furthermore, the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset validated the differential expression of these four genes, which were associated with prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. In conclusion, this study profiled differentially expressed genes using the ovarian cancer progression model and identified four (i.e., GMPS, PR, CD40, and p21) as prognostic markers for ovarian cancer patients. Future studies of prospective patients could further verify the clinical usefulness of this four-gene signature.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21656-e21656
Author(s):  
Ersin Ozaslan ◽  
Metin Ozkan ◽  
Irfan Cicin ◽  
Mustafa Benekli ◽  
Murat Kocer ◽  
...  

e21656 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most important causes of death in cancer patients, with VTE risk being 4-7 times higher among these patients compared to normal population. TREBECA is an observational study on cancer outpatients with low risk VTE treated with LMWH. Methods: Patients were treated by medical oncologists in Turkey at 15 sites, where they were enrolled and followed-up for a period of 12 months. Each center used their own treatment protocol. Primary endpoints were efficacy and the time to a change inVTE status (dissolution of thrombosis). The doses of LMWHs have been calculated according to patients’ body weights based on the dosage scheme and administered subcutaneously once or twice daily. Results: Data for 250 patients who met the study inclusion criteria were examined and analyzed. Of the included patients; 239 patients (95.6%) completed their Day 15 visit, 176 (70.4%) completed their Month 3 visit, 130 (52.0%) completed their Month 6 visit, and 91 (36.4%) completed the entire study. The mean age of the patients was 60.2 ± 13.7, while 53.2% (n = 133) of the patients were women. Colorectal (21.2%), lung (16.8%) and breast (14.8%) cancers were the most common forms of cancer. One hundred thirty-three patients were treated with enoxaparin, 112 patients were treated with bemiparin and 5 patients were treated with tinzaparin. Bemiparin resulted thrombosis resolution in more patients than enoxaparin, during day 15, month 3 and month 6 visits (table 1; p < 0.05). Conclusions: The observation that bemiparin is more effective in resolution of thrombosis was noteworthy. Thrombosis could not be effectively treated within the first 15 days in a significant number of patients, but could effectively be treated in most patients by Month 3. We can conclude that a treatment of at least 3 months is appropriate for cancer patients, even among those who are at low risk for venous thromboembolism. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document