Phase-1 Study of ZIO-101: A New Organic Arsenic Active in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) and Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Abstract Background: Although arsenic trioxide (As2O3) is active in vitro against diverse hematological cancers, clinical data show activity only in acute progranulocytic leukemia (APL); there is little if any single-agent activity in multiple myeloma and other hematological cancers. This discordance may be because relatively little As2O3 can be given consequent to its substantial toxicity (especially QTc-prolongation) or because the mode of action (MOA) in APL (differentiation) is inoperative in other hematological cancers (or both). ZIO-101 (S-dimethylarsino-glutathione), a new organic arsenic, is active against diverse cancers in vitro and in animal models including AML and MM. Cell-killing by ZIO-101 is mediated by mitochondrial-disruption and apoptosis-induction rather than the differentiation MOA of As2O3. ZIO-101 can be given at doses ≥ 50-fold higher than As2O3 and achieves 5–10-fold higher intracellular concentrations at equimolar extracellular As concentrations. Gene-expression profiling data suggest different cellular responses to ZIO-101 and As2O3. These features make ZIO-101 attractive for evaluation in AML and MM. Methods: 2 phase-1 studies evaluating safety, activity and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of ZIO-101 in 21 subjects with advanced AML (N=8) or MM (N=13). Median age is 58 y (range, 41–85 y). Median N of prior therapies is 5 (range, 2–12) including 4 subjects failing prior As2O3 therapy. Starting dose was 78 mg/me2/d IV for 5 consecutive d every 4 w. Results: Subjects received a median of 2 cycles (range, 1–6). Therapy was well-tolerated; adverse events ≥ grade-2 occurring in > 25% of subjects included neutropenia, hypokalemia and hyperglycemia. There was no clinically-important renal, liver or heart toxicity nor QTc-prolongation. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 420 mg/me2/d. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies at this dose showed a tmax=1 h (SD±0.9), Cmax=1.06 μg/mL (SD±0.07 μg/mL), t1/2=17.8 h (SD±1.4 h) and AUC0-∞=25.9 μg·h/mL (SD±0.8 μg·h/mL). 4 subjects with AML had stable disease (SD) after 1 cycle and received 2–4 more cycles before progressing. Blood myeloblasts decreased substantially in 1 subject and completely resolved in 2. Bone marrow myeloblasts decreased in 1. 1 subject with prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) stopped requiring frequent RBC transfusions. 1 subject with rapidly-progressing As2O3- and bortezumib-resistant MM has stable disease (SD) >6 mo. Conclusions: These early data suggest activity of ZIO-101 in advanced AML and MM. The MTD is 420 mg/me2/d, ≥ 50-fold higher than As2O3. Plasma levels exceed the IC50 for AML and MM cell in vitro and animal models. Clinically-important QTc-prolongation was not seen. Some subjects failing As2O3 responded to ZIO-101 indicating efficacy of a higher dose, different MOA or both. Because of these favorable results phase-2 studies in hematological cancers are in progress.

Download Full-text

APTO-253 Induces KLF4 to Promote Potent in Vitro Pro-Apoptotic Activity in Hematologic Cancer Cell Lines and Antitumor Efficacy As a Single Agent and in Combination with Azacitidine in Animal Models of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4813.4813 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4813-4813 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

William G Rice ◽

Avanish Vellanki ◽

Yoon Lee ◽

Jeff Lightfoot ◽

Robert Peralta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Animal Models ◽

Antitumor Activity ◽

Single Agent ◽

Xenograft Model ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Acute Myelogenous ◽

Xenograft Models

Abstract APTO-253, a small molecule that mediates anticancer activity through induction of the Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) tumor suppressor, is being developed clinically for the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). APTO-253 was well tolerated in a Phase I study in patients with solid tumors using a dosing schedule of days 1, 2, 15, 16 of a 28 day cycle (2T-12B-2T-12B), but recent scientific observations guided APTO-253 toward AML and high risk MDS. Indeed, suppression of KLF4 was reported as a key driver in the leukemogenesis of AML and subsets of other hematologic diseases. The vast majority (~90%) of patients with AML aberrantly express the transcription factor CDX2 in human bone marrow stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) (Scholl et al., J Clin Invest. 2007, 117(4):1037-48). The CDX2 protein binds to CDX2 consensus sequences within the KLF4 promoter, thereby suppressing KLF4 expression in HSPC (Faber et al., J Clin Invest. 2013, 123(1):299-314). Based on these observations, the anticancer activity of APTO-253 was examined in AML and other hematological cancers. APTO-253 showed potent antiproliferative activity in vitro against a panel of blood cancer cell lines, with ηM IC50values in AML (6.9 - 305 ηM), acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia (39 – 250 ηM), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (11 – 190 ηM) and multiple myeloma (72 – 180 ηM). To explore in vivo efficacy, dose scheduling studies were initially conducted in the H226 xenograft model in mice. In the H226 model, APTO-253 showed improved antitumor activity when administered for two consecutive days followed by a five day break from dosing (2T-5B) each week, i.e. on days 1,2, 8,9, 15,16, 22,23, compared to the 2T-12B-2T-12B schedule. The 2T-5B schedule was used to evaluate antitumor activity of APTO-253 in several AML xenograft models in mice. In Kasumi-1 AML and KG-1 AML xenograft models, APTO-253 showed significant antitumor activity (p = 0.028 and p=0.0004, respectively) as a single agent when administered using the 2T-5B schedule each week for four weeks compared to control animals. Mice treated with APTO-253 had no overt toxicity based on clinical observations and body weight measurements. Mice bearing HL-60 AML xenograft tumors were treated with APTO-253 for one day or two consecutive days per week for three weeks, either as a single agent or combined with azacitidine, or with azacitidine alone twice per week (on days 1,4, 8, 11, 15 and 18). APTO-253 as a single agent inhibited growth of HL-60 tumors to approximately the same extent as azacitidine. Furthermore, both once weekly and twice weekly dosing of APTO-253 in combination with azacitidine resulted in significantly enhanced antitumor activity relative to either single agent alone (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0006 for 1X and 2X weekly APTO-253 treatment, respectively, compared to control). Likewise, using a THP-1 AML xenograft model, APTO-253 administered as a single agent using the 2T-5B per week schedule showed significant efficacy, similar to that of azacitidine, while the combination of APTO-253 and azacitidine demonstrated greatly improved antitumor effects relative to either drug alone. APTO-253 was effective and well tolerated as a single agent or in combination with azacitidine in multiple AML xenograft models, plus APTO-253 does not cause bone marrow suppression in animal models or humans. Taken together, our results indicate that APTO-253 may serve as a targeted agent for single agent use and may provide enhanced efficacy to standard of care chemotherapeutics for AML and other hematological malignancies. Disclosures Rice: Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Vellanki:Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Lee:Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Lightfoot:Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Peralta:Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Jamerlan:Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Jin:Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Lum:Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Cheng:Lorus Therapeutics Inc.: Employment.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab Combined With All-Trans Retinoic Acid in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood Advances ◽

10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005220 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Kristine A. Frerichs ◽

Monique Christina Minnema ◽

Mark-David Levin ◽

Annemiek Broijl ◽

Gerard MJ Bos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Immune Cell ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Flow Cytometric Analysis ◽

Optimal Dose ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Cd38 Expression

The efficacy of daratumumab is partially dependent on CD38 expression on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. We have previously shown that ATRA upregulates CD38 expression and reverts daratumumab-resistance ex vivo. We therefore evaluated the optimal dose, efficacy and safety of daratumumab combined with ATRA in daratumumab-refractory MM patients in a phase 1/2 study (NCT02751255). In part A of the study, 63 patients were treated with daratumumab monotherapy. Fifty daratumumab-refractory patients were subsequently enrolled in part B, and treated with daratumumab (re-intensified schedule) combined with ATRA until disease progression. The recommended phase 2 dose of ATRA in combination with daratumumab was defined as 45 mg/m2. At this dose, the overall response rate (ORR) was 5%, indicating that the primary endpoint (ORR≥15%) was not met. However, the majority of patients (66%) achieved at least stable disease. After a median follow-up of 43 months, the median PFS for all patients was 2.8 months. Patients who previously achieved at least a partial response or minimal response/stable disease with prior daratumumab monotherapy had a significantly longer PFS, compared to those who immediately progressed during daratumumab as single agent (median PFS 3.4 and 2.8 versus 1.3 months). The median OS was 19.1 months. The addition of ATRA did not increase the incidence of adverse events. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that ATRA temporarily increased CD38 expression on immune cell subsets. In conclusion, the addition of ATRA and re-intensification of daratumumab had limited activity in daratumumab-refractory patients, which may be explained by the transient upregulation of CD38 expression.

Download Full-text

Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Hematology ◽

10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.303 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 2010 (1) ◽

pp. 303-309 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Sagar Lonial

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Single Agent ◽

Great Promise ◽

New Agents ◽

Ongoing Work ◽

The Many

Abstract Advances in treatment options for patients with multiple myeloma have made a significant impact on the overall survival of patients and have helped achieve levels of response and duration of remission previously not achievable with standard chemotherapy-based approaches. These improvements are due, in large part, to the development of the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, each of which has substantial single-agent activity. In addition, a large number of second-generation agents are also in clinical development, such that the repertoire of available treatment options continues to expand. To better interpret clinical trials performed in the relapsed setting, it is important that definitions of relapse categories are used to help better pinpoint the specific benefit for a given therapy, especially in the combination therapy setting as it aids in determining if ongoing work should be continued or abandoned for a given new agent. Insights from preclinical modeling and in vitro work have identified several new combinations, new targets and second- or third-generation versions of existing targets that hold great promise in the setting of relapsed myeloma. Combinations of thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide with conventional agents or among each other have resulted in enhanced response rates and efficacy. Clinical trials of agents such as carfilzomib, pomalidomide, vorinostat, panobinostat, and elotuzomab are just a few of the many exciting new compounds that are being tested in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials for relapsed patients. Further clinical and translational testing are critical to better understanding how best to combine these new agents, as well as identifying patient populations that may best benefit from treatment with these developing new agents.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Trial of Lenalidomide (REVLIMID®) with Bortezomib (VELCADE®) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.365.365 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 365-365 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

R. Schlossman ◽

N. Munshi ◽

D. Avigan ◽

S. Jagannath ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Median Number ◽

Significant Treatment ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Best Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Bortezomib and lenalidomide are active agents in multiple myeloma (MM), and preclinical data showing additive activity in MM in vitro suggest that enhanced clinical benefit may be derived from combining the two drugs. Bortezomib is approved in MM patients (pts) who have received at least one prior therapy in both the US and EU. Lenalidomide has produced durable responses in the relapsed and refractory MM setting, including in those who received prior bortezomib. Toxicities of bortezomib and lenalidomide do not overlap unfavorably. These observations suggest that this regimen, compared with either agent alone, may provide better clinical anti-MM activity. In phase 1 trials, the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of single-agent bortezomib and lenalidomide were 1.3 mg/m2 (IV bolus twice weekly) and 25 mg/d (PO days 1–21 of a 28–day cycle), respectively. The objective of this phase 1 dose-escalation trial was to determine the MTD and activity of this combination in pts with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: Eight 3-pt cohorts were planned with bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 and lenalidomide 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg/day. Pts received bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and lenalidomide on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. Dexamethasone 20 mg orally could be added on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 11, 12 in the event of PD. Toxicity was assessed using NCI-CTC, version 3.0. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity, grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥ 5 days and/or neutropenic fever, or a platelet count ≤ 10,000 on > 1 occasion despite transfusion. Modified EBMT criteria were used to assess response. Results: Nineteen pts with MM have been enrolled to date to cohorts 1–5, including 8 with relapsed and 11 with relapsed and refractory disease. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1–9). Twelve pts had prior SCT; 17 had received thalidomide, 9 bortezomib, 2 lenalidomide. With a median of 7 cycles completed (range, 2–16), pts have received bortezomib 1.0–1.3 mg/m2 and lenalidomide 5–15 mg/d. Two pts with rapid disease progression were not evaluable and were removed from study within the first cycle. One DLT was observed (cohort 4, grade 3 hyponatremia). To date, doses of study drugs were reduced in 6 pts beyond cycle 3. Bortezomib was reduced for thrombocytopenia [n = 3] and hypotension [n = 1] and lenalidomide was reduced for neutropenia [n = 1] and fatigue [n = 1]. No significant treatment-emergent PN has been seen. Responses by cohort are shown in the table, and of 17 evaluable pts, 10 (59%) achieved CR + PR. Conclusions: In heavily treated pts with relapsed and/or refractory MM, the combination of bortezomib and lenalidomide has been well tolerated and has demonstrated very promising activity, even in pts who had previously received either agent alone. Dose escalation is continuing until MTD is reached. Phase II evaluation of this regimen is planned both in relapsed and/or refractory and in newly diagnosed MM. Cohort Bortezomib, mg/m2 Lenalidomide, mg Best Response NE = not evaluable. 1 1.0 5 2 PR, 1 MR 2 1.3 5 1 CR, 2 PR 3 1.0 10 1 nCR, 2 PR, 1 NE 4 1.3 10 2 PR, 2 MR, 1 SD, 1 PD 5 1.0 15 2 SD, 1 NE

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of AR-42 in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2955.2955 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2955-2955 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Craig C. Hofmeister ◽

Zhongfa Liu ◽

Mindy A Bowers ◽

Pierluigi Porcu ◽

Joseph M. Flynn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

T Cell ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Single Agent ◽

Class I ◽

Qtc Prolongation ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2955 Introduction: Deacetylase (DAC) inhibitors show promise as anti-neoplastic agents, the approved drugs are weak inhibitors of class I and II DACs or potent inhibitors of class I DAC only, and have suboptimal activity or unacceptable toxicities. AR-42 is a class I/II DAC-I designed at OSU that demonstrates a 20,000-fold improvement in DAC inhibitory potency relative to the parent molecule (IC50=16 nM) with greater antiproliferative effects than Vorinostat in vitro and in vivo (Kulp et al, Clin Cancer Res, 2006 and Lucas et al, PLoS One, 2010). Methods: OSU 09102 (NCI 9119) is a first-in-man single agent, cohorts-of-3 phase I dose escalation study in adult patients with relapsed CLL, lymphoma (NHL), or multiple myeloma (MM) with normal kidney and liver function. Patients received AR-42 orally M-W-F in cycles of 28 days (3 weeks of 3-times-per-week dosing followed by a 7-day break). Moderate cell count suppression was allowed with an absolute neutrophil cutoff of 1000/μL, platelets 3 50,000/μL and hemoglobin 3 10 g/dL. In the first stage of dose escalation, each dose level increased by 100% until the first grade 2, drug-related toxicity was observed. Subsequent dose increases will be approximately 33% increase with accrual in cohorts of 3 patients. For pharmacokinetic analysis, plasma was obtained at 0 (pre-dose), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 10, 24, and 48 hours after dosing on day 1 and day 19 (only up to 24 h), and then kept at –80°C until analysis. Results: We enrolled 3 patients at 20 mg (MM, MM, NHL), 3 patients at 40 mg (MM) with a transition to a slower dose escalation due to a grade 2 thrombocytopenia. Three more patients were enrolled at 40 mg (MM, MM, T-cell NHL), then 7 patients at 50 mg (MM × 4, follicular × 1, T-cell NHL × 2). One myeloma patient was enrolled at 70 mg. In the 40 mg cohort, related toxicities include 2 grade 3 and 2 grade 2 thrombocytopenia, 1 grade 3 neutropenia, 1 grade 2 vomiting, and 2 grade 1 QTc prolongation. In the 50 mg cohort 1 grade 4 and 3 grade 3 thrombocytopenia, 2 grade 3 neutropenia, 4 grade 2 fatigue, 2 grade 2 muscle spasm, 1 grade 2 blurred vision/dizziness, 3 grade 1 QTc prolongation, and 3 grade 1 nausea. Accrual was temporarily halted for a safety analysis Mar-2012 focused on the 50 mg cohort toxicities – one grade 4 thrombocytopenia considered a DLT, one patient found dead on cycle 2 day 10 without prior evidence of QTc prolongation, and one patient with reproducible dizziness and blurry vision. AR-42 was detected 15 mins after dose in 12 of 17 patients, suggesting rapid absorption. The time to reach the peak concentration in plasma (Tmax) varied from 1.5 hours to 4 hours. The Cmax (see chart) and AUC of AR-42 was not increased proportionally with doses, suggesting that the PK of AR-42 is not linear in the 20–50 mg range. Conclusion: The Cmax achieved at the 40 mg and 50 mg dose levels is adequate for HDAC inhibition in vitro and minor clinical responses were observed in myeloma and T-cell lymphoma as a single agent in the 40 mg cohort (see monoclonal proteins chart), hence 40 mg TIW 3-weeks-on and 1-week-off was declared the MTD. Complete pharmacokinetic, toxicity, and results from brief fatigue inventory will be presented at the meeting. AR-42 does not have the severe fatigue and gastrointestinal side effects of other broad DAC inhibitors and may be suitable for combination phase Ib trials in T-cell lymphoma and myeloma. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Anti-Tumor Phagocytic Cell Activation in Multiple Myeloma By the IAP Antagonist LCL161: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3039.3039 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3039-3039

Author(s):

P. Leif Bergsagel ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

David Dingli ◽

Shaji K. Kumar ◽

Sikander Ailawadhi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Immune Cells ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Best Response ◽

Iap Antagonist ◽

Nfkb Pathway

Abstract Dexamethasone is a powerful anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive agent widely used in the treatment of MM with pleiotropic effects on both the tumor, and host immune cells. We report on a completely novel approach to immune modulation using an agent with almost directly opposite effects to glucocorticoids on innate immune cells. LCL161 is an IAP antagonist targeting the cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins cIAP1 and -2 (cIAP1/2) that in a phase I study in solid tumors was well tolerated with a cytokine release syndrome as the dose limiting toxicity. We previously reported that loss of cIAP1/2 in MM cells results in the stabilization of NIK and activation of the non-canonical NFkB pathway, a pathway we found frequently activated by a promiscuous array of mutations in multiple myeloma (MM). As expected, we found that LCL161 has no direct anti-tumor activity against MM cells in vitro and ex vivo. However, the non-canonical NFkB pathway is also a key activator of the innate immune response. Remarkably, we found that in vivo LCL161 has dramatic, apoptosis-independent activity associated with marked phagocytosisagainst MM that develops spontaneously in an immunocompetent genetically engineered mouse model of MM (Vk*MYC). Cyclophosphamide (Cy), which has been shown to induce an acute secretory activating phenotype in tumor-associated macrophages, markedly potentiated the anti-tumor effects of LCL161. We show that phagocytes (depleted by liposomal clodronate), but not adaptive immune cells, are required for the anti-tumor effect. Consistently we show that LCL161 activates dendritic cells and macrophages in vitro, and in vivo, and upregulates production of inflammatory cytokines. A phase 2 clinical trial of LCL161 was conducted in 24 patients with relapsed MM previously exposed to both IMiDs and PIs, but less than 5 prior lines of therapy. Patients received LCL161 1200mg po weekly, with Cy 500mg po weekly added for progressive disease or lack of response. Single agent LCL161 was well-tolerated, with grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity in four patients, and following the addition of cyclophosphamide in 9 patients. No patients responded to single agent LCL161, and the best response was stable disease in 6/24. In 21 patients, Cy was added after a median of 2 cycles, in whom the best response was stable disease or better in 18/21 (p<0.001 compared to LCL161 alone), and a PR or better (including 1 VGPR and 1 CR) in 5/21 (p<0.001 compared to LCL161 alone). Six months following the initiation of Cy, 35% of patients remain event-free. Two patients had stable disease for more than nine months after stopping treatment. One, relapsing after VDT-PACE, HDM200, RVd x 3 years with t(11;14) and del17p, received only three months of LCL161, the last month in combination with Cy. He then achieved a PR, reconstitution of his uninvolved IgG to normal levels for the first time in more than 3 years and still has not progressed one year after stopping therapy. Similar changes in serum and bone marrow inflammatory cytokines and gene expression were observed in patients following treatment with LCL161 to those observed in the mice. We conclude that LCL161 is able to modulate the tumor microenvironment to exert long-term disease control in combination with Cy, and deserves further study in combination with agents that more directly depend on phagocytic cell activity (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, inhibitors of "Don't eat me" signals). Disclosures Bergsagel: Novartis: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Use of LCL161 to treat multiple myeloma. Kumar:Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene, Millenium, Sanofi, Skyline, BMS, Onyx, Noxxon,: Other: Consultant, no compensation,; Skyline, Noxxon: Honoraria. Stewart:Oncospire Genomics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and phase 1a study of bisthianostat, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Acta Pharmacologica Sinica ◽

10.1038/s41401-021-00728-y ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yu-bo Zhou ◽

Yang-ming Zhang ◽

Hong-hui Huang ◽

Li-jing Shen ◽

Xiao-feng Han ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Drug Targets ◽

Single Agent ◽

Hdac Inhibitors ◽

Preclinical Study ◽

Parp Cleavage ◽

Rpmi 8226 ◽

Ongoing Phase

AbstractHDAC inhibitors (HDACis) have been intensively studied for their roles and potential as drug targets in T-cell lymphomas and other hematologic malignancies. Bisthianostat is a novel bisthiazole-based pan-HDACi evolved from natural HDACi largazole. Here, we report the preclinical study of bisthianostat alone and in combination with bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), as well as preliminary first-in-human findings from an ongoing phase 1a study. Bisthianostat dose dependently induced acetylation of tubulin and H3 and increased PARP cleavage and apoptosis in RPMI-8226 cells. In RPMI-8226 and MM.1S cell xenograft mouse models, oral administration of bisthianostat (50, 75, 100 mg·kg-1·d-1, bid) for 18 days dose dependently inhibited tumor growth. Furthermore, bisthianostat in combination with bortezomib displayed synergistic antitumor effect against RPMI-8226 and MM.1S cell in vitro and in vivo. Preclinical pharmacokinetic study showed bisthianostat was quickly absorbed with moderate oral bioavailability (F% = 16.9%–35.5%). Bisthianostat tended to distribute in blood with Vss value of 0.31 L/kg. This distribution parameter might be beneficial to treat hematologic neoplasms such as MM with few side effects. In an ongoing phase 1a study, bisthianostat treatment was well tolerated and no grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse events (AEs) had occurred together with good pharmacokinetics profiles in eight patients with relapsed or refractory MM (R/R MM). The overall single-agent efficacy was modest, stable disease (SD) was identified in four (50%) patients at the end of first dosing cycle (day 28). These preliminary in-patient results suggest that bisthianostat is a promising HDACi drug with a comparable safety window in R/R MM, supporting for its further phase 1b clinical trial in combination with traditional MM therapies.

Download Full-text

Bioactive Compounds from Herbal Medicine Targeting Multiple Myeloma

Applied Sciences ◽

10.3390/app11104451 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (10) ◽

pp. 4451

Author(s):

Coralia Cotoraci ◽

Alina Ciceu ◽

Alciona Sasu ◽

Eftimie Miutescu ◽

Anca Hermenean

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Survival Rate ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Inhibition Of Proliferation ◽

In Vivo Experiments ◽

Clonal Proliferation ◽

Hematological Cancers ◽

Monoclonal Proteins

Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the most widespread hematological cancers. It is characterized by a clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow and by the overproduction of monoclonal proteins. In recent years, the survival rate of patients with multiple myeloma has increased significantly due to the use of transplanted stem cells and of the new therapeutic agents that have significantly increased the survival rate, but it still cannot be completely cured and therefore the development of new therapeutic products is needed. Moreover, many patients have various side effects and face the development of drug resistance to current therapies. The purpose of this review is to highlight the bioactive active compounds (flavonoids) and herbal extracts which target dysregulated signaling pathway in MM, assessed by in vitro and in vivo experiments or clinical studies, in order to explore their healing potential targeting multiple myeloma. Mechanistically, they demonstrated the ability to promote cell cycle blockage and apoptosis or autophagy in cancer cells, as well as inhibition of proliferation/migration/tumor progression, inhibition of angiogenesis in the tumor vascular network. Current research provides valuable new information about the ability of flavonoids to enhance the apoptotic effects of antineoplastic drugs, thus providing viable therapeutic options based on combining conventional and non-conventional therapies in MM therapeutic protocols.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1/2 Trial of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4774.4774 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4774-4774

Author(s):

James R. Berenson ◽

Laura V. Stampleman ◽

Alberto Bessudo ◽

Peter J. Rosen ◽

Leonard M Klein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

Great Promise ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/ progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who have previously received POM treatment were ineligible. In the phase 1 portion, POM was administered at 2, 3 or 4 mg daily in three cohorts on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5 mg/m2) were fixed and given intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Results As of June 20th, 2014, 48 pts were enrolled in the trial and a total of 47 pts had received study drug. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18), with a median of 2 prior IMiD-containing regimens (range, 0-8). Fifty-three percent of the pts had received a prior PLD-containing regimen and 21% had received a prior IMiD and PLD combination treatment. Among all enrolled pts, 40 pts discontinued treatment and seven remain active. Pts completed a median of 3 cycles (range: 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.4 months (range: 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 36 pts enrolled in phase 2, 78% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 47% had previously received PLD. A median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Thirty-five pts were evaluable for response as one pt was active but had not yet had any post-baseline disease assessments. Among all pts enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 29% and 49%, respectively, with 6 pts (17%) showing stable disease and 12 pts (34%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 4.7 months (range 0-12) and the median PFS was 5.3 months. ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (32% and 58%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (21 pts; 44.7%), lymphopenia (10 pts; 21.3%), and hyponatremia (4 pts; 8.5%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures Berenson: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Swift:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Vescio:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of STI571, an Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in conjunction with other antileukemic agents against Bcr-Abl–positive cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v96.9.3195 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 96 (9) ◽

pp. 3195-3199 ◽

Cited By ~ 215

Author(s):

J. Tyler Thiesing ◽

Sayuri Ohno-Jones ◽

Kathryn S. Kolibaba ◽

Brian J. Druker

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Single Agent ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Abl Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Abl Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Abstract Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), a malignancy of a hematopoietic stem cell, is caused by the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase. STI571(formerly CGP 57148B), an Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has specific in vitro antileukemic activity against Bcr-Abl–positive cells and is currently in Phase II clinical trials. As it is likely that resistance to a single agent would be observed, combinations of STI571 with other antileukemic agents have been evaluated for activity against Bcr-Abl–positive cell lines and in colony-forming assays in vitro. The specific antileukemic agents tested included several agents currently used for the treatment of CML: interferon-alpha (IFN), hydroxyurea (HU), daunorubicin (DNR), and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C). In proliferation assays that use Bcr-Abl–expressing cells lines, the combination of STI571 with IFN, DNR, and Ara-C showed additive or synergistic effects, whereas the combination of STI571 and HU demonstrated antagonistic effects. However, in colony-forming assays that use CML patient samples, all combinations showed increased antiproliferative effects as compared with STI571 alone. These data indicate that combinations of STI571 with IFN, DNR, or Ara-C may be more useful than STI571 alone in the treatment of CML and suggest consideration of clinical trials of these combinations.

Download Full-text