Prolonged Administration of Azacitidine with or without Entinostat Increases Rate of Hematologic Normalization for Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes: Results of the US Leukemia Intergroup Trial E1905

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 601-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Steven D. Gore ◽  
Zhuoxin Sun ◽  
Peter L. Greenberg ◽  
Mark Juckett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Prolonged Administration ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
The Us

Abstract Abstract 601 Background: The current standard of treatment for high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is azacitidine (AZA) administered 75mg/m2/d days 1 – 7 (525 mg/m2/cycle) each 4 weeks. This approach improves survival; however, many AZA-treated patients (pts) continue to require blood products. The US registration trial (CALGB9221 trial; Silverman JCO 2002 and JCO 2006) showed a trilineage response rate (CR plus PR plus trilineage hematologic improvement [TL], IWG 2000) of 15%. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) synergize with azanucleosides in vitro to re-express genes silenced through promoter methylation. In a previous phase I pilot study (J0443 study, NCT00101179), we showed that the combination of AZA and the orally bioavailable HDACi entinostat (MS-275) was effective and tolerable for pts with MDS and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. The recommended Phase II schedule was AZA 50 mg/m2/d s.c. for 10 days (500 mg/m2/cycle) and entinostat 4 mg/m2/d PO on day 3 and day 10 of AZA on a 28 days cycle basis. Methods: E1905 US Leukemia Intergroup study (NCT00313586) is a phase II 1:1 randomized trial of AZA (50 * 10)+ entinostat (arm B) vs AZA (50 * 10) alone (arm A). Following six cycles of treatment, pts with documented clinical response (IWG 2000: CR, PR or TL) continued for the lesser of a total of 24 cycles or disease progression. The primary objective was to determine whether either arm significantly increased the rate of hematologic normalization (HN: CR + PR + TL) compared to CALGB9221 results (i.e. 15% to 30%). Patients were stratified according to the type of disease (i.e. MDS low risk vs MDS high risk vs CMML vs AML). Results: 150 pts were accrued and 136 analyzed (13 ineligible; 1 death before treatment), including 88 MDS, 5 CMML and 43 AML. Median age was 72 years. Poor risk cytogenetics were found in 31% of the patients. IPSS Int-2/High risk patients represented 72% (n=63) of the MDS cohort. There was no difference in pts characteristics between the 2 arms. The median number of administered cycles was 6 (range: 1–24). Toxicities in both arms were acceptable with a trend to an increase in grade IV platelet adverse events in Arm B (63% vs 46%, p=0.07) and grade III-IV fatigue in arm B (23% vs 13%, p=0.13). Overall HN rate was 28%: 10% CR, 8% PR and 10% TL. The HN rates by arm were A: 31% (12/9/10); B 24% (7/7/10) (p=NS). Non-trilineage hematologic improvement was achieved in an additional 12% of pts in arm A and 19% of pts in arm B; thus, total hematologic response was 43% and 44%. The median time to best response was 6 months in both arms (range: 1–14); median duration of response was 11 months (range: 1–18) in arm A and 10 months in arm B (range: 2–19, p=NS). With a median follow-up of 17 months, median overall survival was 18 months in arm A and 13 months in arm B (p=0.15). Conclusions: The rate of hematologic normalization in response to AZA 50 mg/m2/day * 10 in Arm A was twice that observed in C9221. The addition of entinostat examined in E1905 did not improve the response rate. Confirmation of improved response following prolonged administration of lower daily doses of AZA will require direct comparison to the currently approved dose regimen. Disclosures: Gore: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, stock options; Syndax: Consultancy.

A Phase II Add-on Study of Vorinostat (VOR) in Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Failure of Hypomethylating Agents (HMA): The GFM Azavor Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2900-2900
Author(s):  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Jacques Delaunay ◽  
Eric Wattel ◽  
Thorsten Braun ◽  
Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Early Evaluation ◽  
Positive Results

Abstract Background: Azacitidine (AZA) is the current standard of care for patients treated for higher risk MDS, but 40-50% patients do not respond and most responders eventually relapse. Median survival after AZA failure is only 5 months and no standard of care is defined for this population. Preclinical studies and positive results of phase I-II trials support a synergistic effect of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) vorinostat (VOR) and AZA in terms of response, although no survival advantage of the combination has as yet been demonstrated. We hypothesized that adding VOR to AZA in patients with primary or secondary AZA resistance could rescue response and prolong survival. Methods: inclusion criteria inGFM AZAVOR study (NCT 01748240) were: 1/IPSS int 2 or high risk MDS at the time of initiation of AZA 2/treatment with at least 6 cycles of AZA and either failure to achieve any response or loss of response (per IWG2006 criteria) 3/a maximum of 3 months between AZA failure and inclusion with no other treatment in between. Patients received VOR 300mg bid from day 3 to day 9 of each cycle. AZA was given at standard 75mg/m2/d day 1 to 7 or at the maximum previously tolerated dose in case of dose reduction. Patients were evaluated after 6 cycles and responding patients treated until progression. The trial used a two-stage design, and accrual was to be stopped if less than 3 responses were seen in the first 14 evaluable patients. Results 21 patients were included between march 2013 and September 2014. Nineteen patients were treated (1 patient died and 1 progressed before treatment). Median age was 72 years. All pts had higher risk MDS and had received a median of 6 cycles of AZA before entering the trial. The median number of AZA+ VOR cycles administered was 3 (range: 1-12). No unexpected SAEs were seen, and the most common AEs were infection, thrombocytopenia, GI toxicities, and fatigue. After 6 cycles of treatment, only 2 patients (11%) achieved response (1 erythroid hematological improvement, 1 partial remission), , which, per protocol, triggered the stop of accrual. At last follow-up, 18 patients were off study and one patient was still on treatment. Nine patients stopped treatment because of progression (42%), 4 stopped treatment for lack of response (21%), 2 stopped treatment because of intolerance (11%), 1 patient stopped at his request (5%), and 1 patient died of complications of cytopenias while on treatment (5%). Median overall survival was 13 months. Conclusion This is the first report of an add-on study in high risk MDS, a strategy that may be useful for the early evaluation of drugs for which synergy with AZA is expected. Our results show that the proposed regimen of AZA +VOR can be used safely. However, the observed response rate was not above the "background" response rate expected from AZA alone continuation in a comparable patient population, indicating that the addition of VOR cannot reverse resistance to AZA. Disclosures Prebet: CELGENE: Research Funding. Off Label Use: lenalidomide. Wattel:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENTS: Research Funding; CELGENE: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cony-Makhoul:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Fenaux:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vey:Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Phase II study of PS-341 (bortezomib) with or without irinotecan in patients (pts) with advanced gastric adenocarcinomas (AGA)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14040-14040 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Ocean ◽  
F. Schnoll-Sussman ◽  
R. Keresztes ◽  
X. Chen ◽  
S. Holloway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Radiologic Evaluation

14040 Background: We are conducting a phase II trial of the proteasome inhibitor, PS-341, with or without irinotecan in pts with AGA. The combination of PS-341 and irinotecan has been studied in preclinical tumor models including a murine xenograft model of colon cancer, where the combination achieved significantly more tumor shrinkage than either agent alone. The primary objective of this study is to determine response rates, toxicities, progression-free survival, and overall survival in pts with AGA receiving PS-341 alone or in combination with irinotecan. Methods: All pts had gastric adenocarcinoma beyond the scope of surgical resection, measurable disease, and normal bone marrow, hepatic and renal function. All gave informed consent. In previously untreated patients, PS-341 was administered at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 as IV bolus every 21 days. Irinotecan was administered IV at 125 mg/m2 over 90 mins on days 1 and 8 every 21 days (Arm A). For previously treated patients, PS-341 was administered as a single agent at 1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11 as an IV bolus every 21 days (Arm B). Radiologic evaluation and tumor measurements were performed every 8 weeks. Results: Thirty-seven pts have been enrolled; 29 are evaluable (4 never treated, 4 TETE). Twenty-two pts were treated in Arm A, and 11 in Arm B. All pts were eligible and the 29 treated pts were fully evaluable. Median age 58 (33–87); 26 males/7 females; median number of cycles received was 2.0. Most common toxicities: Grade 4 cardiac arrest (1), stomach perforation (1), leukopenia (2), diarrhea (1), edema (1); Grade 3 nausea (6), vomiting (7), diarrhea (4), febrile neutropenia (3), thrombocytopenia (6), anemia (6); Grade 5 death (3). Severe toxicities likely attributed to disease progression. Response rate was 33% for Arm A, 9% for Arm B. Progression-free survival was 1.8 mo. in Arm A, 1.4 mo. in Arm B. Median overall survival was 4.8 mo. in Arm A, 5.4 mo. in Arm B. Conclusions: The combination of PS-341 and irinotecan, a non-cisplatin containing therapy, is active in AGA and should be considered a key regimen. Monotherapy with PS-341 has a 9% response rate in this population of pre-treated patients with advanced disease. Accrual to this study is continuing. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of DJ-927 administered orally once every three weeks as second line therapy to subjects with locally advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of platinum-based non-taxane regimen

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17006-17006 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Szczesna ◽  
E. Milanowski ◽  
E. Juhász ◽  
I. Albert ◽  
J. Von Pawel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Line Therapy

17006 Background: For the treatment of NSCLC (1st and 2nd line) effective oral formulations of drugs are currently investigated. DJ-927 is a semi-synthetic novel taxane with in vitro activity against NSCLC cells lines. Phase I studies show active plasma concentrations after oral administration with hematologic dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). This multi-centre phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DJ-927 in patients (pts) with recurrent NSCLC. Methods: Pts with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have received one prior platinum (non-taxane) containing treatment regimen, performance status 0 -2, and adequate organ function were enrolled. Pts received an initial DJ-927 dose of 27 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 1, orally, every 3-weeks. If < 2 DLTs occurred at this dose, the next cohort of 6 pts would start at a dose of 35 mg/m2, every 3 weeks, and all subsequent pts would be treated at that dose level. The primary endpoint was to assess the response rate. Pts were also assessed for time to disease progression (TTP), survival and safety. Results: 36 pts were enrolled, male/female 27/9; median age of 57 years (range 33–75); ECOG 0/1/2 7/21/8; stage IIIB/IV 12/24. Histology included adenocarcinoma 5; squamous cell 16; large cell 3; undifferentiated 3; other 7; unknown 2. Thirty-four pts received DJ-927; the median number of cycles was 2 (range 1–8). The optimal dosing level was confirmed at 27 mg/m2 as no dose escalation was performed based on toxicity data from parallel studies. Response in evaluable pts (completed Course 1) included CR 1, PR 1, SD 15, PD 8; for an overall response rate of 7 % and a disease control rate (CR, PR and SD) of 61%. Toxicity, ≥ grade 3, in evaluable pts (n = 32) included neutropenia (15), anaemia (6), thrombocytopenia (2), fatigue (2), nausea (2), anorexia (2), pneumonitis (1). Conclusions: In a 3-weekly setting, an oral dose 27 mg/m2 of DJ-927 shows limited efficacy in 2nd line therapy for NSCLC with neutropenia, gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue as major side effects. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals ACTR-20. EFFICACY OF INITIAL TEMOZOLOMIDE FOR HIGH-RISK LOW GRADE GLIOMAS IN A PHASE II AINO (ITALIAN ASSOCIATION FOR NEURO-ONCOLOGY) STUDY: A POST-HOC ANALYSIS WITHIN MOLECULAR SUBGROUPS OF WHO 2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi16-vi17
Author(s):  
Roberta Rudà ◽  
Alessia Pellerino ◽  
Andrea Pace ◽  
Carmine Maria Carapella ◽  
Cristina Dealis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Molecular Subgroups ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Who Grade Ii Gliomas

Abstract BACKGROUND The optimal management of high risk WHO grade II gliomas after surgery is still debated. The efficacy of initial temozolomide to delay radiotherapy and risk of cognitive defects could vary across the molecular subgroups of WHO 2016, but information on this issue are lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS A post-hoc analysis has been performed on a cohort of high risk WHO grade II gliomas, who received initial temozolomide alone in phase II multicenter study, with the objective of re-evaluating the long-term results across the different molecular subgroups of the WHO 2016 classification. The primary endpoint of the study, carried out between 2007 and 2010, was response rate according to RANO, being seizure response, PFS and OS secondary endpoints. RESULTS Response rate (partial and minor responses) among oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted (76%) was significantly higher than that among diffuse astrocytomas either mutant (55%) or wild-type (36%). A reduction of seizure frequency >50% was observed in 87% patients and a seizure freedom in 72%. The probability of seizure reduction >50% was significantly associated with the presence of an IDH mutation. Median PFS, PFS at 5 and 10 years, median OS and OS at 5 and 10 years were all significantly longer in oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted. Of patients who did not recur or delay radiotherapy at recurrence for a median follow-up of 8.2 years, 67% and 59%, respectively, were oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted. CONCLUSIONS The post-hoc analysis of this phase II trial suggests that the beneficial effects of initial temozolomide prevail in oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted: thus, these tumors, when incompletely resected or progressive after surgery, especially when suffering from pharmacoresistant seizures, could receive temozolomide as initial treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy at recurrence. The trial was registered with EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT n. 2007/000386-38.

Imatinib 800 mg: Preliminary Results of a Phase II Trial of the GIMEMA CML Working Party in Intermediate Sokal Risk Patients and Status-of-the-Art of an Ongoing Multinational, Prospective Randomized Trial of Imatinib Standard Dose (400 mg Daily) vs High Dose (800 mg Daily) in High Sokal Risk Patients.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1098-1098
Author(s):  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Nicoletta Testoni ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract The conventional treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in early chronic phase (ECP) is imatinib 400 mg daily. The estimated rates of major (MCgR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) at 42 months are 91% and 84%, respectively (IRIS Trial - F Guilhot, ASH 2004), with a survival free from accelerated and blastic phase of 84%. The rates of CCgR are significantly different according to Sokal score, being 91%, 84% and 69% for low, intermediate and high risk categories. Phase I and II trials of imatinib have clearly shown a dose-response effect; more importantly, a single center phase II trial of imatinib 800 mg in ECP showed significantly better results vs standard dose, in terms of CCgR (90% vs 74%) and of complete molecular response (28% vs 7% at 18 months) [H. Kantarjian et al, Blood 103 (8), 2004]. The GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto) CML WP is conducting a phase II trial of imatinib 800 mg in intermediate Sokal risk in ECP (trial CML/021). Overall, 89 pts (mean age 53 yrs) have been enrolled. Fourty-four patients completed 6 months of treatment: the complete hematological response rate is 100%; the MCgR and CCgR are 90% and 81%, respectively. The 6 months CCgR rate of this trial parallels the IRIS trial one in intermediate risk cases (84%), with a much shorter treatment period. The major molecular response rate at 6 months (RTQ-PCR as ratio BCR-ABL/ABL) is 56% (cut-off ≤ 0.12%) or 41% (cut-off ≤0.05%). The compliance to the treatment improved time by time, being 47% the patients receiving ≥ 80% of the scheduled dose between months 1–3 and 60% between months 4 - 6. A second project, exploring imatinib high dose, is reserved to high risk cases: a multinational working group, within the frame of Leukemianet CML WP, is conducting a phase III randomized trial (1:1) of imatinib 400 mg vs 800 mg in high Sokal risk in ECP. By July 31, 2005, 80 patients have been enrolled: GIMEMA CML WP (44 pts), Nordic Countries - Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland (25 pts), Turkey (10 pts) and Israel (1 pt).

Phase II Multicenter Study of Association of Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) and Ascorbic Acid in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 943-943
Author(s):  
Flavia Salvi ◽  
Daniela Gioia ◽  
Maria Teresa Corsetti ◽  
Anna Maria Pelizzari ◽  
Emanuela Messa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ascorbic Acid ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Arsenic Trioxide ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Abstract 943 Introduction: Arsenic trioxide (ATO) inhibits angiogenesis, induces apoptosis and differentiation in variety of malignant cells. Two multicenter phase II studies have documented that ATO has as a moderate activity both in low and high risk myelodysplasia with 19-21% haematological improvement. Ascorbic acid in “vitro” increases in tumor cells the activity of ATO by depleting GSH and inhibiting NF-kb. High EVI-1 levels have been reported to predicted the response to arsenic trioxide and thalidomide combination therapy. We report the results of a multicenter phase II study with combination of arsenic trioxide and acid ascorbic in myelodysplastic patients. Patient eligibility included:a) pts with 3q26 rearrangement or high EVI-1 levels; b) non-RAEB pts at low-intermediate/1 risk who failed a previous therapy; c) RAEB or high-intermediate-2 risk patients not elegible to chemotherapy and/or bone marrow transplant. Study design: Arsenic trioxide was administrated intravenously over 1 hour at the loading dose of 0.30 mg/kg/day for 5 consecutive days, followed by 0.25 mg/kg/day twice weekly for 15 weeks. Ascorbic acid 1000 mg was given IV within 30 minutes after each arsenic trioxide infusion. Response evaluation was scheduled after two and four months of treatment according to the IWG criteria (Cheson 2000) Patients: 44 pts were enrolled .Median age was 71 years (range 47–80). WHO categories were non-RAEB (15 pts), RAEB-1 (12 pts), RAEB-2 (17 pts). 23 patients had a low/intermediate-1 IPSS score; 18 had a high/intermediate-2 risk. Risk category, could not be assessed in 3 pts lacking of cytogenetic data. Before starting therapy EVI-1 was highly expressed in 13 out of 34 evaluated pts (38%); high WT-1 levels was documented in 25 out of 35 pts (71%). 31 pts (57%) were transfusion dependent at baseline. Results: Ten out of 44 evaluable patients obtained a response (23%). They included 1 complete remission, 2 major erythroid hematologic improvement (HI-E major), 3 minor HI-E, 2 major neutrophil improvemet (HI-N) and 2 major trilineage responses. Response rate was 35% in lower risk IPSS patients and 6% in higher risk pts (p 0.05).Only 3 pts with high EVI-1 expression achieved a response. In 8 out of ten responders, the response was evident within the first 8 weeks of treatment. Twenty three (52%) patients discontinued treatment because disease progression (11%), severe adverse events (32%), drug unrelated adverse events (5%), withdrawal of consent (5%). Severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed respectively in 45% and 23% pts. The other G3-4 adverse events observed were: ATRA-like syndrome (9%), cardiotoxicity (11%) infection (11%), hepatotoxicity (9%). No toxic death was observed. Summary and Conclusions: The combination of ATO and ascorbic acid is tolerable and it is active in about 25% of MDS patients. The addition of ascorbic acid to ATO does not increase neither the toxicity nor the response rate to ATO. The tolerability of this regimen is reduced in elderly and high risk patients. In our study high EVI-1 transcript levels were not confirmed to predict the response to ATO. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Arsenic trioxide is yet approved for the treatment of MDS, even if its efficacy has been shown in other phase II studies.

5-Azacitidine Therapy in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4963-4963
Author(s):  
Alessandra Freyrie ◽  
Gianluigi Reda ◽  
Daniele Vincenti ◽  
Mariarita Sciumé ◽  
Francesca Binda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Male To Female ◽  
Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract Abstract 4963 Overall survival (OS) is significantly improved by 5-azacitidine in intermediate-2 (int-2) and high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) with 10–29% marrow blasts, and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20–30% marrow blasts, compared with conventional treatments, and currently appears as the standard of care, at least in patients who are not candidates to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 5-azacitidine in 25 patients treated at our institution from 2009 to 2012, outside of clinical trial. Our series was composed by 17 cases of MDS with IPSS risk int-2 or high, 6 AML with marrow blasts between 20% and 30% and 2 CMML. Patients were treated with 5-azacitidine at a dosage of 75 mg/m2/d subcutaneously for 7 days every 28 days (schedule 5 day on, 2 day off and 2 day on). Median age of our cohort was 72 years (range 37–81 y), male to female ratio was 0. 6 and the median number of cycles received was 7 (range 1–26). According to the MDS-specific comorbidity index 9 pts (53%) were classified as low-risk, 7 pts (41%) as intermediate risk and 1 pt (6%) as high risk. Seventeen (68%) patients (13 MDS, 3 AML, 1 CMML) who had received at least 4 cycles of therapy were evaluable. Median age of these 17 patients was 71 years (range 37–81 y), male to female ratio was 0. 8 and median number of cycles administered was 8 (range 4–26). The overall response rate (ORR) was 59% (10/17 patients). According to International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria, five patients (29%) reached complete remission (CR) after a median of 5 cycles of therapy (range 4–6), two patients (12%) obtained hematologic improvement with bone marrow complete remission (marrow CR) after 6 and 11 cycles of therapy respectively, three patients (18%) showed hematologic improvement (HI) after 5 cycles (range 4–6), while stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were observed in 4 (23%) and in 3 patients (18%) respectively after 5 cycles (range 4–7). Median duration of response was 12 months (range 6–26 mo); median overall survival from the beginning of 5-azacitidine, for all patients treated, was 14. 4 months (range 7–33 mo). We did not observe any differences in response rate according to age, bone marrow fibrosis, cytogenetics and transfusion requirements. In the responder group (10 patients) we did not observe grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity after a median observation time of 10 months (range 5–33 mo). Among non-responding patients, four (57%) recurred to hospitalization due to infectious or hemorrhagic complications (median observation time 15 months, range 7–33). 5-azacitidine confirmed to be an active therapy for patients with int-2 and high risk MDS and AML with low marrow blast counts not candidate to high intensity treatment for age and or comorbidities, showing high response rate and good tolerability. The low rate of serious adverse events and need of hospitalization improved patient's quality of life and reduced the utilization of medical resources. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Combination of Quizartinib with Azacitidine or Low Dose Cytarabine Is Highly Active in Patients (Pts) with FLT3-ITD Mutated Myeloid Leukemias: Interim Report of a Phase I/II Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 388-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Low Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with early relapse and poor survival. Quizartinib potently and selectively inhibits FLT3 kinase activity. In a phase I and II studies the composite response rate (CRR) was approximately 50% among patients with FLT3-ITD. There is in-vitro synergy between quizartinib and 5-AZA or LDAC. We hypothesize that adding quizartinib to a hypomethylating agent such as 5-azacitidine (AZA) or cytarabine may improve the response rate expected from the use of either agent alone. Objectives: The primary objective of phase I part is to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of quizartinib (AC220) with either AZA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC); for phase II is to determine the clinical activity of both combinations. This planned interim analysis reports on the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and first futility analysis. Methods: For phase I, patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or AML were eligible irrespective of FLT3 mutation and salvage status. For phase II, presence of FLT3-ITD is a requisite. Phase II enrollment is limited to patients >60 years with untreated MDS/CMML/AML, or any age receiving first salvage treatment. Additional eligibilities include performance status ECOG ≤2, adequate organ function, normal electrolytes (potassium, calcium and magnesium). Important exclusions include QTcF> 450 mSec, concomitant drugs that prolong QT/QTc interval or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers with the exception of antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals that are used as standard of care. Treatment cycle is defined as 28 days. Treatment comprises of AZA 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) or intravenously (IV) for 7 days of every cycle (Days 1-7), or cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily for 10 days of every cycle (Days 1-10) along with quizartinib at two planned dose levels: 60 mg (dose level 1) or 90 mg orally daily (dose level 2) uninterrupted. Patients are assigned to AZA or LDAC arm by physician choice or slot availability. Planned accrual for each arm in phase 2 is 26 pts each and an ORR of ≥50% will be considered favorable. Accrual of 26 pts will give a 95% credible interval for overall response rate of (0.32, 0.68). The study will be stopped for toxicity (>30%) and/or futility (ORR <50%) at interim analysis for each arm. Results: Twenty-six (Phase I=12, phase II=14) pts have been enrolled: 18 to AZA arm and 8 to LDAC arm. Median age is 62 years (range, 25-79 years), 7 (27%) are female. Cytogenetics are diploid=14, +8=2, -7=2, miscellaneous=6, 11q and t(8;21)= 1 each. Median number of prior therapies is 2 (range, 0-7), 7 patients received prior FLT3 inhibitor. For both schedules quizartinib 60 mg daily was identified as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on emerging results from separate dose-finding study. Eighteen [5 in LDAC arm (63%) and 13 (72%) in AZA arm; all with FLT3-ITD mutation without D835 mutation] of 26 total pts (69%) have responded (CR=1/ CRp=3/ CRi=2/ MLFS=10/PR=1/HI=1). Among patients with FLT3-ITD (N=22), ORR is 82%. Four of 7 (57%) patients with prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure responded. Median number of days to respond is 57 days (range, 25-102 days). Among responders two patients died (MLFS=1, PR=1): one with gastro-intestinal bleeding and other with progressive pneumonia. Three additional responders have discontinued therapy for stem cell transplant (1), withdrawal of consent (1), and loss of response with emergence of D835 mutation (1). Nine responders (CR=1, CRi=1, CRp=1, PR=1, MLS=5) had >50% reduction of FLT3-ITD allelic burden and 2 additional pts (CR=1, CRi=1) had no detectable FLT3-ITD at response. Number of pts with treatment emergent grade 3/4 toxicities irrespective of attribution include hypokalemia (15), hypophosphatemia (5), hyponatremia (4), hypocalcemia (4), hyperbilirubinemia (3), increase in ALT (1), hypernatremia (1hyperglycemia (1), hypotension (1), QTcF prolongation (1, grade 3). Conclusion: Combination of quizartinib and AZA or LDAC is highly active among patients with AML/MDS/CMML with FLT3-ITD . Response rates appear higher than expected with either agent alone. Clinically significant QTcF prolongation is infrequent. Accrual to both arms of the current trial continues. Disclosures Cortes: Ambit Biosciences: Research Funding.

Gemcitabine plus carboplatin for patients with pretreated, metastatic breast cancer: A phase II trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10635-10635
Author(s):  
D. Laessig ◽  
U. Vehling-Kaiser ◽  
P. Fasching ◽  
F. Melchert ◽  
H. Koelbl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Present Trial

10635 Background: In search for treatment regimens which can be applied in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin was shown to be effective in several trials. To improve on tolerability and handling of the regimen, cisplatin was replaced by carboplatin in the present trial. Methods: Patients with intensively pretreated, metastatic breast cancer (age 18 to 70 years) and measurable disease were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 8) and carboplatin (AUC 4 iv on day 1) in a 3-week regimen. The trial was performed as a 2-stage phase II study according to the optimal design described by Simon (p0 = 0.1, p1 = 0.3, α = 0.05, β = 0.1) with overall remission rate (according to RECIST) as the the primary objective. Results: Of 39 recruited patients (median age: 60 years, range 29 to 77 years) response data are available from 35 patients. A positive hormone receptor status was observed in 77% of patients, and 31% of patients were Her-2 overexpressing. All patients had received prior chemotherapy, and 49% of patients had been subjected to 2 or more treatment regimens for metastastatic disease. Prior treatment consisted of anthracyclines (87%), alkylating agents (77%), taxanes (67%), and antimetabolites (62%). Prior endocrine therapy had been applied to 77% of patients. At the time of evaluation, a total of 183 treatment cycles were documented with a median number of 5 cycles per patient (range 1 to 11). Treatment is presently ongoing in 8 patients. A CR was observed in 1/35 patients, a PR in 8/35 patients for an overall remission rate of 26% (95%-CI: 12% to 43%). Stable disease was documented in 49% (17/35) of patients. Median time to progression was 4.9 months (95%-CI: 2.9 to 6.8 months). In 39 evaluable pts, CTC grade 3/4 leukopenia was observed in 22/2 pts, neutropenia in 14/8 pts, anemia in 3/0 pts, and thrombocytopenia in 11/8 pts. Treatment delays and/or dose reductions were performed in 49% of cycles. Conclusion: Gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin is an effective combination for second- or third-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Novel organic arsenic molecule darinaparsin: Development of IV and oral forms

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8501-8501 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Lossos ◽  
M. D. Craig ◽  
M. S. Tallman ◽  
R. V. Boccia ◽  
P. R. Conkling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase I Studies ◽  
Advanced Malignancies

8501 Background: Darinaparsin (ZIO-101) is a novel organic arsenical active against diverse cancers in vitro, and in vivo. Darinaparsin i.v. activity in lymphoma is being evaluated in a phase II study. Darinaparsin is orally bioavailable; the oral form is being investigated in two phase I studies in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: Phase II trial is being conducted in patients diagnosed with advanced lymphomas who had ≥ 1 prior therapy. Patients receive 300 mg/m2/day of darinaparsin i.v. for 5 consecutive days every 28 days. Efficacy and safety are evaluated by standard criteria. Phase I oral dose escalation studies are being conducted in patients with advanced malignancies and explore safety, MTD, DLTs and preliminary efficacy of continuous and intermittent dosing schedules. Starting continuous dose is 100 mg BID for 3 weeks with 1 week rest, starting intermittent dose is 300 mg twice weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week rest. Results: The phase II study has accrued 28 lymphoma patients (21 non-Hodgkin's, 7 Hodgkin's); median age at baseline 61 years, ECOG ≤2, median number of prior therapies 3. Seventeen subjects have received at least 2 cycles of darinaparsin and are evaluable for efficacy. Of these, 1 subject (PTCL) has achieved a complete response, 3 - partial responses (2 marginal zone, 1 Hodgkin's), and 4 stable disease (2 PTCL, 1 DLBCL, 1 Hodgkin's). A total of 63 cycles of darinaparsin have been administered to subjects with lymphoma. No Gr. 3 or higher drug-related AEs were reported. Two SAEs were considered possibly drug-related (fall; neutropenic fever). Phase I studies accrued 35 patients; median age at baseline 58 years, ECOG ≤2, median number of prior therapies 3. Predominant tumor types include: colorectal (17), pancreatic (3), NHL (3). Current darinaparsin dose levels: continuous 200 mg BID, 2× weekly 900 mg. Of 18 patients evaluable for efficacy, 10 demonstrate SD ≥ 3 cycles. Oral darinaparsin bioavailability is 58%. Drug-related AEs include nausea/vomiting, fatigue, decreased appetite/anorexia. Conclusions: Darinaparsin is active in heavily pretreated patients with advanced lymphoma and has been very well tolerated. Oral darinaparsin is also well tolerated, and shows early activity. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document