Statin Treatment Prevents FLT3 Glycosylation and Overcomes Resistance to FLT3 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1421-1421
Author(s):  
Allen Williams ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Bao Nguyen ◽  
Patrick Brown ◽  
Mark J. Levis ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1421 FLT3 is a receptor tyrosine kinase that is expressed on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells where it functions in cell differentiation, survival and proliferation. It is also one of the most frequently mutated genes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and has thus become a target for modulation by the use of FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Unfortunately, clinical resistance emanating via several different mechanisms has limited the potential benefit of FLT3 TKI. Some of these include FLT3 mutations that reduce drug binding, elevated FLT3 ligand (FL) levels that shift the dose-response curve and activation of parallel signaling pathways. These all pose major challenges to TKI effectiveness that must be overcome to improve patient outcomes. Since FLT3 is dependent upon N-linked glycosylation for its maturation and surface localization, we sought to determine whether statins might disrupt FLT3 signaling. Statins inhibit the mevalonate pathway and reduce levels of all ensuing end-products including dolichol, which transfers preassembled oligosaccharides onto nascent polypeptides. Here, we demonstrate by Western blotting that statins can indeed prevent complex FLT3 glycosylation, thus leading to loss of surface receptor expression. Immunofluorescence microscopy confirms a reduction in surface localization and a concomitant increase in intracellular FLT3/ITD accumulation. Interestingly, this aberrant localization was associated with increased STAT5 activation while inhibiting both MAP kinase and AKT phosphorylation. We have extended our previous findings that statins are cytotoxic to mutant FLT3 expressing cell lines to examine whether they are also able to overcome the resistance mechanisms discussed above. We show that the following mechanisms of resistance could be circumvented by fluvastatin. First, stimulation of BaF3 FLT3/ITD cells with exogenous FL at physiologic concentrations induces a three-fold increase in the IC50 for inhibition of phosphorylated FLT3/ITD by the FLT3 TKI lestaurtinib. Pretreatment with fluvastatin for 24 h eliminated surface FLT3/ITD: FL interactions and restored the potency of lestaurtinib. Secondly, resistance to another clinical FLT3 TKI, sorafenib, caused by the FLT3/ITD N676K or D835Y mutations increased the IC50 from 5 nM for BaF3/ITD cells to 30 nM and >50 nM, respectively. In contrast, both of these mutants remained just as sensitive to treatment with fluvastatin as were the BaF3/ITD cells (approx. IC50 of 0.2 μM). A third mechanism of resistance that can be circumvented by fluvastatin is the over expression and/or activation of alternative pathways that can compensate for inhibited FLT3. A model of this is rescue of BaF3 FLT3/ITD cell lines from FLT3 TKI-mediated cytotoxicity by stimulation with IL-3. When this cell line is stimulated with IL-3, fluvastatin is able to inhibit activation of STAT5, AKT and MAP kinase caused by the IL-3 receptor, as well as FLT3/ITD signaling, leading to cell death. Fluvastatin was also effective in other cell lines expressing constitutively activated FLT3 (Molm-14, MV4;11, HB1119 and SEM-K2 cells) and in other cell lines in which glycosylated transmembrane receptors drive proliferation (mutant c-Kit in Kasumi cells) but not in cells that rely upon intracellular kinases (BCR-ABL in K562 cells). Importantly, fluvastatin also reduced FLT3 glycosylation in and was cytotoxic to primary AML patient samples harboring FLT3/ITD mutations at therapeutically achievable concentrations (1 μM). Finally, fluvastatin reduced engraftment of BaF3 FLT3/ITD cells transplanted in syngeneic Balb/c mice and prolonged their survival. These results demonstrate that statins, a class of drugs already FDA approved, might be useful, either alone or in combination with a FLT3 TKI, in the management of FLT3 AML cases including those resistant to FLT3 TKI. Disclosures: Levis: Ambit Biosciences, Inc: Consultancy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 3773-3791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Omsland ◽  
Vibeke Andresen ◽  
Stein‐Erik Gullaksen ◽  
Pilar Ayuda‐Durán ◽  
Mihaela Popa ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e0161470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura N. Eadie ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Deborah L. White

Chemotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingying Ma ◽  
Quanchao Zhang ◽  
Peiyan Kong ◽  
Jingkang Xiong ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
...  

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has entered a new era. The efficacy of TKIs compared with other ALL treatment options is emphasized by a rapid increase in the number of TKI clinical trials. Subsequently, the use of traditional approaches, such as combined chemotherapy and even allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), for the treatment of ALL is being challenged in the clinic. In light of the increased use of TKIs in the clinic, several questions have been raised. First, is it necessary to use intensive chemotherapy during the induction course of therapy to achieve a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status? Must a patient reach a complete molecular response/major molecular response before receiving allo-HSCT? Does MRD status affect long-term survival after allo-HSCT? Is auto-HSCT an appropriate alternative for allo-HSCT in those Ph+ ALL patients who lack suitable donors? Here, we review the recent literature in an attempt to summarize the current status of TKI usage in the clinic, including several new therapeutic approaches, provide answers for the above questions, and speculate on the future direction of TKI utilization for the treatment of Ph+ ALL patients.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4804-4804
Author(s):  
Reinhold Munker ◽  
Cory Cordova ◽  
Paula Polk ◽  
Charles V. Wendling ◽  
Amanda W. Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been successfully introduced for the treatment of cancer. Imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib target bcr/abl and were found to induce molecular remissions in chronic myeloid leukemia. Imatinib has also been found to be active in other malignancies like gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Sunitinib and sorafenib are multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and so far, have shown activity against renal cell carcinoma and other cancers. Gefitinib targets the tyrosine kinase of epidermal growth factor receptor and has been found to be active against some cases of non-small cell lung cancer. There is circumstantial evidence that tyrosine kinases and their receptors (e.g. VEGF, IGF-1 and FGFR3) are active in multiple myeloma. In order to develop new treatments for multiple myeloma (MM), we tested several currently available TKIs for their activity against MM cell lines. Materials and methods: The a cell lines MC/CAR, ARH77, RPMI 8226, ARP1, JJN3, MM1S, and INA-6 were treated with various concentrations of TKIs and analyzed for cell growth in liquid culture, proliferation, apoptosis, and gene expression pattern screening 14,500 genes using U133A_2 arrays. Results: Imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, gefitinib induced cytotoxicity in most cases at high concentrations (50% inhibitory concentration ≥ 100 μMol), whereas sunitinib and sorafenib were active at lower concentrations (50% IC 1– 5 μMol). The cytoxicity was observed early (within 4 to 24 hours of exposure) and involves apoptosis. Interleukin-6 did not offer protection against the cytotoxicity of sorafenib or sunitinib, however the inhibition of proliferation was more pronounced in low fetal calf serum (2.5 versus 10%). A short-term exposure of the myeloma cell line MM1S to 10 μMol sorafenib resulted in more than 2 fold changes in 283 genes or sequences (175 up, 108 down). If only 10 fold changes are considered, 21 genes or sequences were upregulated (mainly enzymes, regulators and ligands) and 11 downregulated (mainly regulatory proteins, among them IL6 signal transducer). Conclusion: We found that the multitargeted TKIs sorafenib and sunitinib are active in vitro against multiple myeloma. We plan to investigate patient samples, and to elucidate the targets and the mechanisms of action. Our data will support clinical trials both as single agent and in combination with other drugs like bortezomib, thalidomide, alkylators and ionizing radiation.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4915-4915
Author(s):  
Cagla Kayabasi ◽  
Cigir Biray Avci ◽  
Sunde Yilmaz Susluer ◽  
Tugce Balci ◽  
Yusuf Baran ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4915 The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in cytotoxicity, apoptosis and autophagy levels in myeloid leukemia cell lines treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors compared to cell line resistant to imatinib and control group. Chronic myeloid leukemia model was created by using cell lines as K-562 cell line for Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia model, HL-60 cell line for acute promyelocytic Ph- leukemia model. NCI-BL2171 normal cell line was used as a control group while K562/ima3 cell line was used as an imatinib resistant model. Imatinib (STI571), Dasatinib (BMS-354825), Ponatinib (AP24534) were used as tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this study. Cytotoxicity analysis was conducted by WST-1 analysis. Apoptotis was evaluated by AnnexinV-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and by Mitoprobe JC-1 for Mitochondrial Potential Detection. Autophagy was analyzed by The Premo Autophagy Tb/GFP TR-FRET LC3B assay which measures autophagy in cells expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged LC3B using a Tb-based TR-FRET immunoassay approach. By using IC50 doses of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, autophagic effect of these drugs on cell lines were examined at 24th hours. Cells not treated with the active substance or chloroquine were considered as control groups. Chloroquine-treated cells were used as positive control for autophagy. LC3B-II increase is an indicator of autophagic suppression. Cells treated with chloroquine were compared with cells treated with active substances and concentrations of BacMam that displayed the highest LC3B-II increase were selected. Autophagic suppression ratio of the drugs was evaluated among the control group. Cytotoxicity, apoptosis and autophagy analysis results were provided in Table. Compared to control group, 30 μM chloroquine repressed autophagy 1. 93, 1. 48, 2. 74 and 1. 54 fold in K562, HL-60, K562/ima3 and NCI-BL 2171 cells, respectively. In HL-60 cells while Imatinib represented 0. 77 fold autophagy, it repressed autophagy 1. 77 and 3. 49 fold in K562 and K562/ima3 cells respectively. Dasatinib repressed autophagy 2. 11, 1. 95 and 4. 62 fold and Ponatinib repressed autophagy 2. 09, 1. 60 and 9. 15 fold in K562, HL-60, K562/ima3 cells respectively. Imatinib, Dasatinib and Ponatinib did not repressed autophagy in NCI-BL 2171 cells. In conclusion, apoptosis and autophagy paradox was illuminated in myeloid leukemia cells via tyrosine kinase inhibitors and autophagy may be a new strategy for targeted therapy in myeloid leukemia after clarifying responsible genes and proteins in signal transduction pathways. Cytotoxicity Apoptosis Autophagy WST-1 IC50 (nM) Annexin V JC-1 Premo Autophagy Ýmatinib Dasatinib Ponatinib Ýmatinib Dasatinib Ponatinib Ýmatinib Dasatinib Ponatinib Ýmatinib Dasatinib Ponatinib K562 24th hour 1.70 3.65 3.05 3.07 1.37 1.35 1.43 1.77 2.11 2.09 48th hour 650.00 0.24 2.67 2.51 2.32 2.03 2.35 2.06 72nd hour 4.53 4.81 3.00 2.97 3.07 2.50 HL-60 24th hour 1.33 1.26 1.32 1.29 1.22 1.34 0.77 1.95 1.60 48th hour 18000.00 1.39 1.23 1.41 1.61 1.92 1.96 72nd hour 896.00 607.00 2.21 1.80 2.82 1.58 1.73 2.23 K562/ima3 24th hour 1.33 0.76 1.69 1.51 1.36 1.59 3.49 4.62 9.15 48th hour 18350.00 1830.00 9.87 1.80 1.94 2.03 2.82 1.22 1.40 72nd hour 1.34 1.44 1.41 2.61 1.40 1.56 NCI-BL 2171 24th hour 48.00 2.48 2.79 2.62 3.99 4.04 4.25 1.01 0.88 0.90 48th hour 274.00 30.00 4.11 4.33 4.15 5.05 2.75 3.11 72nd hour 6.14 6.04 6.03 8.27 3.71 3.95 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document