Trends in Incidence and Survival of Multiple Myeloma with Second Primary Malignancy,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3958-3958
Author(s):  
Pedram Razavi ◽  
Kristin A Rand ◽  
Sikander Ailawadhi

Abstract Abstract 3958 Introduction: Recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have lead to improved patient outcomes and significant improvement in MM survival. Reports from ongoing randomized clinical trials have suggested that there may be an association between the types of treatment received, particularly certain novel therapeutic agents, and a higher incidence of second primary malignancies (SPM) among MM patients. In this analysis, we explored current patterns and trends in incidence and survival of MM between 1973–2008 to better characterize MM patients with second primary malignancies. Methods: We used data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER) to examine the incidence and survival trends in MM by SPM status between 1973–2008. We included all cases with MM as the first primary malignancy and calculated the age-adjusted annual incidence rates (AIR per 100,000) stratified by those with single primary (SP) MM and those with MM as the first of multiple primaries (FMP). All cases that were not microscopically confirmed or those with an MM diagnosis coded only from autopsy- or death certificates were excluded from the analysis. We used joinpoint regression models to calculate the annual percent change (APC) and to determine the best fitting line or set of lines that describes the MM temporal trends. A Monte Carlo permutation method was used to test for significance. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for MM by SPM status, and all analyses were further stratified by year of diagnosis, age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Results: A total of 61,411 cases of MM were recorded in all SEER registries between the years 1973 and 2008. The final analysis included 49,801 SP and 3090 FMP cases. Overall, the AIR of MM was 5.31 (95% CI 5.26–5.36). The AIR of SP MM was 4.33 (95% CI 4.28–4.38) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.27–0.29) for FMP MM. Compared to women, men were 1.41 times (95% CI 1.38–1.44) and 1.95 times as likely to develop SP MM and FMP MM, respectively. African-Americans had the highest rate of SP MM (AIR 9.09; 95% CI 8.85–9.34) and FMP MM (AIR 0.69; 95% CI 0.62–0.76). We observed no significant trend in AIR of SP MM between 1973–2008 (APC 0.03). The rate of FMP MM was relatively stable, however we observed a small but statistically significant increasing trend in incidence between 1973 and 1992 (APC 2.9), followed by a decreasing trend between 1992 and 2008 (APC −3.2). The rate ratio of FMP to SP MM has remained stable at approximately 6% from 1973–2008. The overall hazard ratio of mortality was 0.59 (95% CI 0.56–0.61) with a median survival of 3.6 years in the FMP MM versus 1.7 years in the SP MM patients. There was a statistically significant improvement in the survival of SP MM patients over the past three decades (P for trend < 0.001), with the most prominent increase in the 2002–2008 period with a HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.64–0.69) when compared to those diagnosed in the 1973–1981 period. In contrast, the survival of FMP MM patients remained constant (P for trend=0.39). Although SP MM patients show a significant increase in survival over time, FMP MM survival remained stable and significantly higher. We further stratified the survival analysis by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. In all stratified analyses, FMP MM patients had a significantly better outcome compared to SP MM patients. Conclusions: Although there has been significant improvement in survival for patients with SP MM in recent years, our results provide an epidemiologic evidence suggestive of a subtype of MM with a better outcome, yet a higher risk of secondary primary malignancies. The incidence rate and outcome of this possible subtype has remained unchanged over the last three decades. These findings are replicated when stratified by gender, race, age, and year of diagnosis. Recent advancements of MM treatment have seemed to only increase the survival of SP MM patients, while the survival of FMP MM patients remained stable. Further studies are needed to explore the potential genetic heterogeneity between MM with and without second primary malignancies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (12) ◽  
pp. 2764-2767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Nancy Brandenburg ◽  
Zhinuan Yu ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
...  

Abstract In a retrospective pooled analysis of 11 clinical trials of lenalidomide-based therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM; N = 3846), the overall incidence rate (IR, events per 100 patient-years) of second primary malignancies (SPMs) was 3.62. IR of invasive (hematologic and solid tumor) SPMs was 2.08, consistent with the background incidence of developing cancer. In a separate analysis of pooled data from pivotal phase 3 trials of relapsed or refractory MM (N = 703), the overall IR of SPMs was 3.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-6.31) with lenalidomide/dexamethasone and 1.38 (95% CI, 0.44-4.27) with placebo/dexamethasone; IRs of nonmelanoma skin cancers were 2.40 (95% CI, 1.33-4.33) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.23-3.66), respectively; IRs of invasive SPMs were 1.71 (95% CI, 0.86-3.43) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.23-3.66), respectively. The risk of SPMs must be taken into account before initiating lenalidomide treatment. In the context of the observed survival benefit in relapsed or refractory MM patients, the benefit/risk profile of lenalidomide/dexamethasone remains positive.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Ormerod ◽  
Christopher A. Fausel ◽  
Rafat Abonour ◽  
Patrick J. Kiel

2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-001946
Author(s):  
Julie My Van Nguyen ◽  
Danielle Vicus ◽  
Sharon Nofech-Mozes ◽  
Lilian T Gien ◽  
Marcus Q Bernardini ◽  
...  

ObjectiveOvarian clear cell carcinoma has unique clinical and molecular features compared with other epithelial ovarian cancer histologies. Our objective was to describe the incidence of second primary malignancy in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma at two tertiary academic centers in Toronto, Canada between May 1995 and June 2017. Demographic, histopathologic, treatment, and survival details were obtained from chart review and a provincial cancer registry. We excluded patients with histologies other than pure ovarian clear cell carcinoma (such as mixed clear cell histology), and those who did not have their post-operative follow-up at these institutions.ResultsOf 209 patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma, 54 patients developed a second primary malignancy (25.8%), of whom six developed two second primary malignancies. Second primary malignancies included: breast (13), skin (9), gastrointestinal tract (9), other gynecologic malignancies (8), thyroid (6), lymphoma (3), head and neck (4), urologic (4), and lung (4). Eighteen second primary malignancies occurred before the index ovarian clear cell carcinoma, 35 after ovarian clear cell carcinoma, and 7 were diagnosed concurrently. Two patients with second primary malignancies were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome. Smoking and radiation therapy were associated with an increased risk of second primary malignancy on multivariable analysis (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.54 to 9.07, p=0.004; OR 4.39, 95% CI 1.88 to 10.6, p=0.0008, respectively). However, for patients developing second primary malignancies after ovarian clear cell carcinoma, radiation therapy was not found to be a significant risk factor (p=0.17). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (p=0.85) or overall survival (p=0.38) between those with second primary malignancy and those without.ConclusionPatients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma are at increased risk of second primary malignancies, most frequently non-Lynch related. A subset of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma may harbor mutations rendering them susceptible to second primary malignancies. Our results may have implications for counseling and consideration for second primary malignancy screening.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah M. Khan ◽  
Jameel Muzaffar ◽  
Hermant Murthy ◽  
John R. Wingard ◽  
Jan S. Moreb

Lenalidomide maintenance following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered the standard of care for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A recent meta-analysis has provided additional evidence that lenalidomide maintenance is associated with a higher incidence of second primary malignancies, including both hematologic and solid malignancies. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as a second primary malignancy is rarely described in the literature. Herein, we describe two patients with MM treated with induction therapy, ASCT, and lenalidomide maintenance that experienced cytopenias while on maintenance. ALL was unexpectedly diagnosed on bone marrow biopsy. One patient was diagnosed on routine biopsy performed as part of requirements of the clinical trial. Both patients had B-cell ALL, without known poor risk cytogenetics, and were managed with standard induction therapies resulting in complete remission. We also reviewed the literature for similar cases of secondary ALL (sALL) in MM patients exposed to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). In conclusion, persistent cytopenias in responding MM patients receiving IMiDs maintenance should be an indication for bone marrow biopsy. Patients develop sALL after median of 32.5 months (range, 20–84) from being on lenalidomide or thalidomide maintenance, often presenting with cytopenias, display low tolerance to chemotherapy, but remission can often be achieved.


2018 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano J. Costa ◽  
Kelly N. Godby ◽  
Saurabh Chhabra ◽  
Robert Frank Cornell ◽  
Parameswaran Hari ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 678-678
Author(s):  
Pedram Razavi ◽  
Gaurav Patel ◽  
Asher Chanan-Khan ◽  
Sikander Ailawadhi

Abstract Abstract 678 Background: Second primary malignancies (SPM) among multiple myeloma (MM) patients have been reported with an estimated incidence varying from 1%–15%. We have previously reported that significant disparity exists in MM survival across patients of different ethnicities. We undertook a Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) based analysis to describe the incidence of SPM among MM patients of different ethnicities, in order to explore the variable impact that SPM might have on MM outcomes of patients across racial subgroups. Methods: SEER database was used to examine the standardized incidence rates (SIR) of SPM among MM patients diagnosed between 1973–2008. Observed to expected ratio (O/E) of SPM was calculated using incidence rates of cancers for the general population. The 95% confidence limits (CI) were constructed using Fisher's exact test. The analysis was restricted to patients with MM as first primary, microscopic confirmation of diagnosis, reporting sources not coded as autopsy- or death-certificate-only, and SPM reported more than 2 month after MM diagnosis. Mutually exclusive race/ethnicity categories were: African-Americans (AA), Asians/Pacific Islanders (API), Hispanic whites (HW), Non-Hispanic whites (NHW), and others. The risk of SPM among MM patients was explored by ethnicity, type of SPM, and latency period. Results: A total of 3090 cases of MM with SPM were diagnosed between 1973–2008, of which, 2021 patients met our inclusion criteria. Stratification of SPM by ethnicity revealed: 387 AA (19%), 72 API (4%), 51 HW (3%), 1500 NHW (74%) and 11 other (<1%) cases. There was an average 4.7-year latency period between diagnosis of MM and SPM (mean age 68.2 and 72.9 years, respectively). The latency period was not significantly different by type of SPM (solid organ vs. hematological) or ethnicity. AA had the youngest age at diagnosis for both, MM and SPM (65.6 and 70.1 year, respectively). (Figure 1) For all SPM sites analyzed together, there was no significant difference between the observed and expected incidence (O/E 0.98; 95% CI 0.94–1.02). However, O/E risk was significantly decreased for solid organ SPM (N=1695; O/E 0.92; 95% CI 0.88–0.96) and increased for hematological malignancies (N=263; O/E 1.63; 95% CI 1.44–1.84). Highest excess risk among all SPM was noted for acute non-lymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) (O/E 6.51; 95% CI 5.37–7.83). The overall risk of observed SPM was not different from expected rates by ethnicity, with the exception of HW who had a significantly decreased overall SPM risk. Table 1 summarizes significant results of O/E risk of SPM by race and site. HW and NHW were less likely to develop overall solid organ SPM. Within solid organ sites, HW had a significantly decreased O/E risk of developing lung/bronchus and prostate SPM. NHW were the only ethnic subgroup with an increased O/E risk of developing melanoma of skin, while the O/E risk of developing SPM of kidney/renal pelvis was increased only among AA. The risk of ANLL as SPM was significantly increased among AA, API, and NHW, while risk of NHL as SPM was only increased among NHW. Conclusion: Exploring potential causes of outcome disparities is important for evaluating disease characteristics and optimal triaging of healthcare resources for specific patient populations. We have performed the largest population-based analysis for the risk of SPM in MM patients stratified by race/ethnicity. We found that the risk of developing SPM among MM patients is variable depending on the patient's ethnic background. This warrants further exploration of the impact of SPM on outcomes of MM patients across different racial subgroups. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Karthikeyan ◽  
Sarath Chandra Sistla ◽  
Ramachandran Srinivasan ◽  
Debdatta Basu ◽  
Lakshmi C. Panicker ◽  
...  

Abstract Multiple primary malignant neoplasm is the occurrence of a second primary malignancy in the same patient within 6 months of the detection of first primary (synchronous), or 6 months or more after primary detection (metachronous). Multiple primary malignant neoplasms are not very frequently encountered in clinical practice. The relative risk for a second primary malignancy increases by 1.111-fold every month from the detection of the first primary malignancy in any individual. We present 2 patients treated for carcinoma of the breast who developed a metachronous primary malignancy in the stomach to highlight the rare occurrence of multiple primary malignant neoplasms. These tumors were histologically dissimilar, with distinct immunohistochemical parameters. The importance lies in carefully identifying the second primary malignancies, not dismissing them as metastases, and treating them accordingly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document