Cirmtuzumab (UC-961), a First-in-Class Anti-ROR1 Monoclonal Antibody: Planned Interim Analysis of Initial Phase 1 Cohorts

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1736-1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
George F. Widhopf ◽  
Januario Castro ◽  
Hongying Li ◽  
Reilly L Kidwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Receptor Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Orphan Receptor

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells of nearly all patients (pts) express ROR1 (Receptor tyrosine kinase-like Orphan Receptor 1), an orphan-receptor tyrosine-kinase-like protein that is normally expressed during embryogenesis, but not by normal post-partum tissues. ROR1 is a receptor for Wnt5a, which can induce non-canonical Wnt signaling to enhance CLL-cell survival and/or proliferation. We have developed antibodies that bind to epitopes that span the extracellular portion of human ROR1, and selected one mAb that had the most potent activity in inhibiting such signaling. We fully humanized this antibody to generate UC-961 (cirmtuzumab). GLP-compliant studies demonstrated that this antibody does not cross-react with normal post-partum tissues. Preclinical pharmacology/toxicology studies in Sprague-Dawley rats showed no evidence of toxicity for cirmtuzumab at doses up to 400 mg/kg by IV administration with an apparent half-life exceeding 7 days. Studies in cynomolgus monkeys again showed no apparent toxicity with an antibody half-life of approximately 14 days. Based on these IND-enabling studies, we have initiated a first-in-human phase 1 dose escalation study to determine the safety and tolerability of cirmtuzumab in the treatment of pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Here, we report results of planned interim safety analysis of pts in the initial phase 1 cohorts. METHODS: Key eligibility criteria included relapsed or refractory CLL and indication for therapy according to working group guidelines (iwCLL). The starting dose was 15 mcg/kg, based on preclinical modeling of 30% target saturation. Cirmtuzumab was administered every 14 days for a total of 4 doses, with intra-patient dose escalation in the absence of toxicity. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of 3 to 6 patients, with the most recently completed cohort receiving doses of 0.5 mg/kg to 1 mg/kg. Pre-planned analysis of safety and tolerability was conducted at the completion of a 56-day dose-limiting toxicity observation period. RESULTS: Between August 2014 and July 2015, 10 pts have received cirmtuzumab. The median age of the treated pts was 72 (range 58 to 81); the median number of prior therapies was 4 (ranging from 1-9). Nine pts had at least 1 high-risk prognostic factor, including leukemia-cell expression of ZAP-70 (4 pts), unmutated IGHV (5 pts), del(17p) or complex karyotype (5 pts). Cirmtuzumab was well tolerated. We have not observed ≥ grade 2 drug-related adverse events (AE) in any of the treated pts. The only grade 1 drug-related AE that occurred in more than 1 pt was anemia (3 pts), all of which resolved. One patient came off study due to continued disease progression after receiving a single dose of 15 mcg/kg; the rest of the pts received all four doses of cirmtuzumab, as per protocol. The low dose administered to patients in the first few cohorts precluded us from detecting sufficient cirmtuzumab in the plasma for pharmacokinetic studies. However, cirmtuzumab was detected in the plasma of pts in later cohorts, allowing us to estimate a half-life for cirmtuzumab of approximately 14 days. Response was assessed as per iwCLL criteria 2 months after the final dose of cirmtuzumab. 3 pts have not yet reached that time point, and 1 pt was not evaluable due to progresison and early study discontinuation. Of the 6 pts evaluable for response, 2 experienced continued disease progression and 4 met criteria for stable disease. With a median follow-up of 103 days after the completion of cirmtuzumab, 2 pts that had disease progression have required additional therapy; the other 4 have yet to require additional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cirmtuzumab is a first-in-class anti-ROR1 monoclonal antibody. In a phase 1 dose-escalation trial, pts with relapsed or refractory CLL have tolerated cirmtuzumab well, without any drug-related grade 2 or higher AEs. This is consistent with the preclinical profile and lack of target expression in normal tissues. The ongoing phase 1 study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of higher doses to determine the maximum tolerated dose or biologically optimal dose of cirmtuzumab. Disclosures Choi: Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Jamieson:J&J: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding. Kipps:Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding.

A Phase 1 Study of Sea-CD70 in Myeloid Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 23-24
Author(s):  
Ahmed Aribi ◽  
Anjali S Advani ◽  
William Donnellan ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
Marcello Rotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Immune Evasion ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Myeloid Malignancies

Background SEA-CD70 is being developed in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Current treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) MDS or r/r AML and outcomes remain poor. SEA-CD70 is an investigational humanized, non-fucosylated monoclonal antibody targeting CD70. Expression of CD70 is limited in normal tissue, but is aberrantly expressed on malignant myeloid blasts while absent from healthy hematopoietic progenitor cells. CD70 and its ligand, CD27, may play a role in malignant blast cell survival and/or tumor immune evasion. SEA-CD70 uses a novel sugar-engineered antibody (SEA) platform to produce a non-fucosylated antibody with enhanced effector function. The proposed mechanism of action of SEA-CD70 includes elimination of CD70 positive cells via enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and mediation of complement-dependent cytoxicity (CDC). Additionally, SEA-CD70 has the potential to block the interaction of CD70 with CD27, which may disrupt signals that enhance blast proliferation and survival and may modulate the immune system to limit immune evasion and increase antigen specific T cell responses. Methods SGNS70-101 is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, and cohort expansion study designed to establish the safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of SEA-CD70 in pts with myeloid malignancies (NCT04227847). Dose escalation is ongoing. In dose escalation, pts must have r/r MDS with 5-20% blasts which has failed prior treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA), and have no other therapeutic options known to provide clinical benefit for MDS. After conclusion of dose escalation, monotherapy expansion cohorts will be opened for pts with MDS and for pts with AML. Primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended expansion dose of SEA-CD70. Secondary objectives are to assess antitumor activity, PK, and immunogenicity of SEA-CD70. Once dose escalation is complete and the recommended monotherapy dose is identified, combination cohorts will be considered in AML and MDS. The study is currently enrolling with sites opening in the US and EU. Disclosures Aribi: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Advani:OBI: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Donnellan:Kite Pharma/Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; TCR2 Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celularity: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Ryvu Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fathi:Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; NewLink Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; TrovaGene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blue Print Oncology: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rotta:Merck: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Vachani:Blueprint: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Yang:AROG: Research Funding; Protagonist: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Ho:Seattle Genetics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Garcia-Manero:Novartis: Research Funding; Helsinn Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Onconova: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acceleron Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study of ACTR087 in Combination with Rituximab, in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory CD20-Positive B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 244-244
Author(s):  
Javier Munoz ◽  
Samantha Jaglowski ◽  
Matthew S. McKinney ◽  
Iris Isufi ◽  
Patrick J. Stiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Dose Levels

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR087 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ-signaling domain and a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Here we present the clinical experience from Study ATTCK-20-2 (NCT02776813), a multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR087 in combination with rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The main objectives of this first-in-human study were to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of ACTR087+rituximab. Other objectives included evaluating ACTR T-cell persistence and other correlative biomarkers. Subjects must have had CD20+ NHL that was R/R after prior treatments, which must have included anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects received lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR087. Additional doses of rituximab were administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study included a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR087) and an expansion phase (ACTR087 at the preliminary recommended phase 2 dose [RP2D]); all subjects received rituximab at a fixed dose of 375 mg/m2 q3w. Results: Two dose levels (DL) of ACTR087 were evaluated during dose escalation (n=17). The MTD was exceeded at DL2, with severe cases of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Statistical analysis of the relationship between non-hematologic toxicity and ACTR+ T-cell doses was retrospectively performed (two-parameter Bayesian logistic regression model) to estimate an RP2D of 35×106 ACTR+ T cells. Nine subjects enrolled in an expansion cohort and received ACTR087 at this RP2D in combination with rituximab. Among all subjects treated (n=26), the majority (69%) were diagnosed with DLBCL. Subjects had received a median of 3 (range 1-9) prior lines of therapy, with 77% having received ≥3 prior lines. ACTR087 showed dose-dependent expansion with peak levels generally observed 7 to 14 days post administration. In subjects with ongoing clinical response (CR), ACTR remained detectable through the last timepoint evaluated. Across all cohorts, Grade ≥3 TEAEs reported in >3 subjects regardless of causality were limited to hematologic events. Potential T cell-mediated toxicities were observed, including 4 serious cases of CRS (Gr 4 in 2 subjects, both with fatal sepsis) and 2 serious cases of neurotoxicity (1 Gr 5, 1 Gr 4 in a subject with fatal septic shock). Elevated baseline inflammatory markers (eg, ferritin, CRP) were observed in patients who developed Gr ≥3 CRS and neurotoxicity post ACTR087. Of note, severe CRS presented without fever and events occurred >7 days post ACTR087. Clinical activity was reported with an ORR of 50% in all dose levels tested, including durable complete responses, with one subject in CR for 869+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: ACTR087+rituximab demonstrated antitumor activity, with observed safety events that are expected with other autologous T-cell products. The time to onset and clinical presentation of severe CRS and neurotoxicity events in this study informed the safety monitoring and adverse reaction management guidance across clinical studies of ACTR T-cell products. Data from this first-in-human study of ACTR087+rituximab confirm the proof of concept and will be used to guide further development for the ACTR platform. Updated clinical data, as well as expanded biomarker correlations to efficacy and safety, will be presented. Disclosures Munoz: Pharmacyclics /Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board. Isufi:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Stiff:Gamida-Cell: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Akard:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Preliminary Clinical Results from a Phase 1 Study of ACTR707 in Combination with Rituximab in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory CD20+ non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1587-1587
Author(s):  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Jason R. Westin ◽  
Jonathon B. Cohen ◽  
Luke P. Akard ◽  
Samantha Jaglowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Clinical Responses

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR707 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ signaling domain and a CD28 co-stimulatory domain. ACTR707 is in clinical development in combination with rituximab (NCT03189836) or trastuzumab (NCT03680560). Here we present clinical findings from the dose escalation phase of Study ATTCK-20-03, an ongoing, multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR707+rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The primary objectives of this first-in-human study are to evaluate the safety of the combination of ACTR707 and rituximab and to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Other objectives include evaluating antitumor activity and ACTR T-cell persistence. Subjects must have CD20+ NHL that is R/R after prior treatments, which must include anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR707. Additional doses of rituximab are administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study includes a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR707 with fixed dose of rituximab at 375 mg/m2 q3w) and an expansion phase at the RP2D. Results: Six subjects received ACTR707 at Dose Level 1 (DL1; 23-38×106 ACTR+ T cells), 3 subjects at DL2 (30-50×106 ACTR+ T cells), and 5 subjects at DL3 (45-55×106 ACTR+ T cells). The majority of the subjects were diagnosed with DLBCL (93%) and had refractory disease (71%), defined as progressive disease as the best response to any prior treatment or relapse <1 year post autologous stem cell transplant. In DL1 through DL3, as of 27 May 2019, there were no dose-limiting toxicities, AEs of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), serious or severe neurologic AEs, or AEs leading to deaths on treatment. TEAEs reported in >2 subjects, regardless of causality or grade, included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, cough, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. SAEs considered possibly related to ACTR707 were febrile neutropenia (n=2) and cytopenia (n=1). ACTR707 expansion generally reached peak levels within 1 to 2 weeks after administration. All subjects with complete response (CR) up to 1 year had detectable ACTR at the last timepoint evaluated. Higher ACTR707 CD8:CD4 T-cell ratios were associated with clinical responses. Clinical activity was reported across DL1 through DL3, with an overall response rate of 64% including durable complete responses (CRs), with one subject in CR for 387+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: Data available from DL1 through DL3 of ACTR707+rituximab suggest that clinical responses can be achieved without severe T cell-mediated toxicities (eg, CRS and neurotoxicity) that have been reported with other autologous T-cell products. Dose escalation continues at a target dose of 80×106 ACTR+ T cells; enrollment in DL4 (n=6) was recently completed. Updated data, including identified correlates of clinical outcomes, will be presented for DL1 through DL4. Disclosures Flinn: TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Cohen:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; Hutchison: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Akard:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Bachanova:Celgene: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GT Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Ivosidenib (AG-120) Induced Durable Remissions and Transfusion Independence in Patients with IDH1-Mutant Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Results from a Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Expansion Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1812-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney D. DiNardo ◽  
Justin M. Watts ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Stephane de Botton ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Transfusion Independence ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Advisory Role

Abstract BACKGROUND: Recurrent mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) are observed in approximately 4% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and have been linked with increased transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Ivosidenib (AG-120), an oral, potent, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of the mutant IDH1 protein (mIDH1), is a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of patients with mIDH1 MDS. Through inhibition of mIDH1, ivosidenib suppresses the production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), leading to clinical responses via differentiation of malignant cells. AIM: To report safety and efficacy data from patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) MDS enrolled in the first-in-human, phase 1, dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib in patients with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT02074839). METHODS: This ongoing study is evaluating the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of ivosidenib. Trial enrollment was completed on 08May2017. In dose escalation, patients received single-agent ivosidenib orally once daily (QD) or twice daily in 28-day cycles. The MTD was not reached and 500 mg QD was selected as the dose to be tested in expansion. Expansion Arm 3 enrolled patients with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies, including MDS. The overall response rate (ORR) for MDS was defined as complete remission (CR) + partial remission + marrow CR. Exploratory biomarker assessments included baseline co-occurring mutations (next-generation sequencing panel for hematologic malignancies) and mIDH1 variant allele frequency (VAF) in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BEAMing Digital PCR; lower limit of detection for mIDH1, 0.02-0.04%). Here, we present safety and efficacy data for patients with MDS in expansion Arm 3 and in dose escalation whose starting dose was 500 mg QD. RESULTS: In all, 258 patients (78 in dose escalation, 180 in expansion) received ivosidenib, including 12 patients with MDS (9 from expansion and 3 from escalation) whose starting dose was 500 mg QD. Baseline characteristics for these 12 patients were: 9 men/3 women; median age, 72.5 years (range, 52-78) and 42% were ≥75 years of age; median number of prior therapies, 1 (range, 1-3). As of 10Nov2017, 7 of 12 (58.3%) patients remained on treatment and 5 (41.7%) had discontinued (one for allogeneic stem cell transplantation). The median duration of exposure to ivosidenib was 11.0 months (range, 3.3-31.1). The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade, irrespective of causality, occurring in ≥20% of the 12 patients were back pain (n=4, 33.3%) and anemia, decreased appetite, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, hypokalemia, pruritus, and rash (n=3, 25.0% each). The majority of these AEs were grade 1-2 and reported as unrelated to treatment. No AEs led to permanent discontinuation of treatment. IDH differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS) was observed in 2 of 12 (16.7%) patients; the events were grade 1 and 2, respectively. Of the 12 patients with MDS receiving ivosidenib 500 mg QD, 5 achieved CR (41.7%; 95% CI 15.2%, 72.3%) and 6 achieved marrow CR (50.0%), resulting in an ORR of 91.7% (95% CI 61.5%, 99.8%). The median durations of CR and overall response were not estimable at the time of the data cutoff. The percentages of patients who remained in CR and response at 12 months were 60.0% and 61.4%, respectively. Among 5 patients who were transfusion dependent at baseline, 4 became transfusion independent for at least 56 days on treatment. Baseline co-occurring mutations and changes in mIDH1 VAF levels on ivosidenib therapy will be presented. CONCLUSION: In patients with mIDH1 R/R MDS, ivosidenib monotherapy was well tolerated and induced durable remissions and transfusion independence. These findings support the role of ivosidenib as an effective, oral, targeted treatment for patients with mIDH1 R/R MDS. Disclosures DiNardo: Karyopharm: Other: Advisory role; Medimmune: Other: Advisory role; Celgene: Other: Advisory role; Bayer: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role. Watts:Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Stein:Celgene: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. de Botton:Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fathi:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stein:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Foran:Agios: Research Funding; Xencor, Inc.: Research Funding. Stone:AbbVie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cornerstone: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Fujifilm: Consultancy; Sumitomo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Steering Committee; Ono: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Argenx: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Amgen: Consultancy. Patel:France Foundation: Honoraria; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tallman:Cellerant: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board. Choe:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dai:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fan:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kapsalis:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hickman:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agresta:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Attar:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Phase 1/2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 432-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Jonathan Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 432 Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against CS1, a cell surface glycoprotein, which is highly and uniformly expressed in multiple myeloma (MM). Elotuzumab induces significant antibody-dependant cytotoxicity (ADCC) against primary myeloma cells in the presence of either autologous or allogeneic peripheral lymphocytes (PBMC), which is significantly enhanced when PBMC effector cells were pretreated with lenalidomide (Tai et al., Blood 112:1329, 2008). The primary objective of the phase 1 portion of the study is to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM. The study is also evaluating safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical response. Lenalidomide (25 mg PO) is given on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Elotuzumab in three escalating dose cohorts (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg) is administered by IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of the 28-day cycle in the first two cycles and then on Days 1 and 15 of each subsequent cycle. Dexamethasone is given weekly at 40 mg PO. Initially, patients received 6 cycles of treatment unless withdrawn earlier due to disease progression or unacceptable. toxicity. The protocol was amended to allow for patients in the 10 and 20 mg/kg cohorts to receive treatment for up to 12 months following enrollment of the last patient. Key entry criteria: age ≥ 18 years; MM with at least one relapse; measurable disease M-protein component in serum and/or in urine; and prior lenalidomide treatment, if any, more than 6 weeks of first dose. To date, 24 patients with a median age of 60 years have been enrolled in the study and 23 patients have received study drug. The median time from initial diagnosis of MM was 5 years and patients had received a median of 3 prior MM treatments. Patients had been previously treated with thalidomide (58%), bortezomib (67%) or lenalidomide (21%) and 42% were refractory to their most recent MM therapy. Patients have been treated in the 3 cohorts; 3 patients each in the first two cohorts (5 and 10 mg/kg elotuzumab) and 17 patients (7 in dose-escalation phase and 10 in the expansion phase) in the third cohort (20 mg/kg). No dose limiting toxicities were identified during the dose-escalation phase of the study and no MTD was established. One patient discontinued in the first cycle due to grade 4 allergic reaction resulting from elotuzumab infusion in the expansion phase of the study. Additional SAEs (1 of each) included grade 2 atrial fibrillation (related to lenalidomide/dexamethasone) and unrelated grade 4 ruptured diverticulum, grade 3 neutropenic fever and grade 3 diarrhea.. Other common grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia (25%) and thrombocytopenia (25%), which were managed by dose withholding or dose reduction of lenalidomide. Approximately 25% of patients experienced grade 1 or 2 chills and/or pyrexia associated with elotuzumab infusion. The best clinical response (IMWG criteria) in the 13 patients who have received at least two cycles of treatment is shown in the table below. Preliminary PK analysis of elotuzumab suggests a serum half-life of 10-11 days at 10 and 20 mg/kg. Elotuzumab at all three doses resulted in near complete saturation of CS1 sites on plasma cells and NK cells in bone marrow and NK cells in the peripheral compartment. In conclusion, the combination of elotuzumab with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone has a manageable adverse event profile and compared to historical data for lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone, the preliminary efficacy data (≥ PR of 92%) are very encouraging. Additional safety, efficacy and PK/PD data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Lonial: Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide/dexamethasone in combination with elotuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Vij:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Harousseau:Celgene France: Advisory Board; Janssen Cilag France: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Mazumder:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Leleu:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fry:Facet Biotech: Employment. Singhal:Facet Biotech: Employment. Jagannath:Millennium: Advisory Board; Merck: Advisory Board.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Expansion Study to Determine Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the BET Inhibitor FT-1101 As a Single Agent in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3907-3907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Ronald Paquette ◽  
Shira Dinner ◽  
William B. Donnellan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bet Inhibitor

Background: BET inhibitors have demonstrated therapeutic potential in hematologic malignancies; however low therapeutic margins have limited clinical development. FT-1101 (also known as CC-95775) is a BET bromodomain inhibitor of all 4 BET family members BRD4, BRD2, BRD3, and BRDT (Kd ≤20 nM) and shows additional activity towards several non-BET bromodomain proteins (including CECR2 and BRD9). In vitro, FT-1101 displayed potent anti-proliferative activity across a broad panel of human leukemia cell lines. In xenograft and syngeneic models, FT-1101 achieved superior tumor growth inhibition (including regressions) relative to JQ1, another BET inhibitor (Millan 2015). Methods: A Phase 1 study evaluated the safety, PK/PD, and clinical activity of FT-1101 in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML/MDS, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (NCT02543879). Oral FT-1101 (10 mg - 600 mg) was dosed once a week (QW), every other week (QOW), or monthly (QM) during dose escalation. Safety was assessed via treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) for all pts; efficacy (response) was assessed in evaluable pts by investigators. Pharmacodynamic biomarkers (CCR1 and HEXIM1 mRNA expression) were assessed in whole blood. Results: Between 17-Nov-2015 and 05-Mar-2019, a total of 84 AML/MDS pts and 10 NHL pts received FT-1101 in dose escalation with a median of 2 (range 1-13) treatment cycles and median exposure of 43 (1-401) days for AML/MDS and 51.5 (1-183) days for NHL pts. Most AML/MDS pts (n=80) received FT-1101 monotherapy; a small cohort (n=4) received FT-1101 200 mg QOW in combination with azacitidine. FT-1101 appeared to demonstrate dose-proportional PK (10-600 mg/dose) with a median Tmax of 4 (1-24) hrs and a mean T1/2 of 52 (18-123) hrs. Pharmacodynamic responses correlated with FT-1101 concentrations; preliminary analysis indicated that PD biomarker modulation (↓ CCR1 and ↑ HEXIM1) was seen with FT-1101 doses as low as 80 mg, with more robust modulation observed at FT-1101 doses >180 mg. The most common (>20%) TEAEs (all grades) were diarrhea (32%), fatigue (30%), dyspnea (29%), nausea (27%), anemia (24%), and platelet count decreased (21%) among AML/MDS pts and diarrhea (60%), nausea or pleural effusion (40% each), and cough, decreased appetite or dyspnea (30% each) among NHL pts. The most common (>10%) severe (≥ grade 3) TEAEs were anemia (21%), decreased platelets (19%), pneumonia (16%), sepsis (13%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and disease progression (11%) among AML/MDS pts and pleural effusion or disease progression (20% each) among NHL pts. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 22 AML/MDS pts (26%) and 2 NHL pts (20%). Twenty AML/MDS pts (24%) and 2 NHL pts (20%) died due to AEs, all assessed as unrelated to study treatment. Disease progression was the most common fatal TEAE in AML/MDS and NHL pts (10% and 20%, respectively). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) on the QOW schedule was 400 mg FT-1101; MTDs were not determined for other schedules. Among evaluable AML/MDS pts who received >180 mg FT-1101 monotherapy (n=30), one pt (3%) on the 400 mg QOW schedule achieved complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and 19 pts (63%) achieved stable disease, including 2 pts receiving >7 cycles of treatment. Among evaluable NHL patients who received >180 mg FT-1101 monotherapy (n=3), one pt (33%) achieved stable disease. Conclusions: FT-1101, as monotherapy, shows acceptable safety, PK, and modest clinical activity in R/R AML/MDS and NHL pts. Intermittent (QOW) dosing within a tolerable range elicits PD activity (CCR1 suppression and HEXIM1 upregulation) consistent with preclinical observations indicating antitumor activity, and provides a rationale for testing FT-1101 in combination with standard therapies in AML/MDS and NHL. Disclosures Patel: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Dinner:Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Grunwald:Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding. Ribadeneira:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Schroeder:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Brevard:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Wilson:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Sweeney:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Kelly:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Lancet:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Preliminary Safety, Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Analysis of the Polo-like Kinase-1 (PLK1) Inhibitor PCM-075, in Combination with Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) or Decitabine (D) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4043-4043
Author(s):  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
Alexander I Spira ◽  
Prapti A. Patel ◽  
Michaela L. Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Gene Expression Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Blast Cells

Abstract Background: Polo-like Kinase 1 (PLK1), a serine/threonine kinase, is a master regulator of cell-cycle progression and overexpressed in numerous cancer types including AML. In a randomized phase 2 study, a pan-PLK inhibitor, volasertib, administered IV to patients (pts) with newly diagnosed AML in combination with LDAC showed a statistically significant survival advantage compared to LDAC alone, however a subsequent phase 3 study did not reach significance. Unfavorable features of volasertib may have contributed to this outcome: a long half-life (~5 days), lack of specificity and the safety of the dosing regimen. PCM-075 is a third generation, orally active and highly selective PLK1 inhibitor with a ~24-hour half-life that demonstrates activity in preclinical AML models both as a single agent and in combination with LDAC. It is also safe and well tolerated as shown by a phase 1 trial in pts with solid tumors (Weiss et al 2018 Invest New Drugs 36:85-95). PCM-075 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1b dose-escalation trial (NCT03303339) for R/R AML in combination with either LDAC or D. The primary objective is to assess safety, PK, and the maximum tolerated dose of these drugs in combination. In addition, potential PD biomarkers for response are being explored. Methods: Pts are treated with PCM-075 for 5 days in combination with either LDAC (20 mg/m2 SC qd x 10d) or D (20 mg/m2 IV qd x 5d) over a flexible 21 to 28-day cycle. Each arm follows a standard dose escalation design with 50% increments in successive cohorts of 3 pts. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is evaluated during the 1st cycle. Blood samples and bone marrow (BM) biopsies are obtained within each treatment cycle for PK profiles, PD and genomic biomarker analyses. Immuno- and genomic profiles are characterized in blood and BM blast cells. Assessment of PLK1 inhibition is determined by changes in phosphorylation status of pTCTP, a PLK1 substrate. Genomic analysis (detection of fusions and mutations) and gene expression analysis (RNA-seq) are being used to identify genetic subtypes and gene expression signatures that may be associated with response to treatment. Results: As of July 20, 2018, 12 pts (9M, 3F), ages 33-88 (median 66 years) were enrolled in this trial. At the starting dose of 12mg/m2 of PCM-075, 3 pts received LDAC and 4 D. The second cohort (18mg/m2) enrolled 5 pts; 3 received LDAC and 2 received D. The median duration of treatment for all pts was 1 cycle (range 1-4 cycles); 5 pts are still ongoing. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated for 9 pts based on available data. Events observed in more than one pt included fatigue (4), constipation (2) and nausea (2), and all were grade ≤2. Hyponatremia was reported in 2 patients, grades 1 and 3, respectively. All non-hematologic AEs were reversible and considered treatment-unrelated except for a grade 1 fatigue (1 pt) and grade 1 nausea (1 pt). Serious adverse events were reported for 5 pts as 17 separate events but none were considered treatment-related. The most frequent SAE was febrile neutropenia (3 pts). No treatment-related deaths or DLTs occurred and escalation of dosing is ongoing. PK profiles of PCM-075 in LDAC and D pts were similar to profiles obtained from pts treated with PCM-075 alone in the previous phase 1 trial, suggesting no drug interaction between PCM-075 with LDAC or D. To date, PD markers were evaluated in 8 pts. Three pts showed a significant decrease in PLK1 activity via assessment of pTCTP status 3h after treatment that was sustained after 4 daily doses of PCM-075. In these 3 pts, percent circulating blasts were reduced from 33% to 7%, 92% to 24%, and 61% to 4%. BM blasts in these pts were reduced from 75% to 60% (cycle 2), 96% to 40% (cycle 2), and 30% to 15% (cycle 1), respectively. Conversely, in pts who did not show decreases greater than 10% in either circulating or BM blasts, PLK1 inhibition was not observed, suggesting a potential correlation between PLK1 inhibition and reduction of blast cells. Conclusions: The combination of PCM-075 with either LDAC or D demonstrated safety and tolerability in the first two dose cohorts of patients with R/R AML, and further dose escalation is ongoing. Evidence of PLK1 inhibition has been observed and this appears to be correlated with systemic blast reduction. Additional clinical activity, genomic and gene expression analysis of other biomarkers associated with PLK1 inhibition and response to treatment will be provided from expanded and escalated dosing cohorts. Disclosures Zeidan: Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Incyte: Employment; Pfizer: Consultancy. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Spira:BMS: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy. Patel:Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; France Foundation: Honoraria. Ridinger:Trovagene: Employment. Silberman:Trovagene: Consultancy. Erlander:Trovagene: Employment. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding.

MEDI-551, a Humanized Monoclonal Anti-CD19, in Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Advanced B-Cell Malignancies: Results From a Phase 1/2 Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3677-3677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Forero ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Celeste M. Bello ◽  
Thomas J Kipps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Disease Assessment ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
B Cell Malignancies

Abstract Abstract 3677 Background: MEDI-551 is an affinity-optimized and afucosylated humanized IgG kappa monoclonal antibody directed against CD19 and induces malignant clone destruction by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. This study evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy profile of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. These include chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and multiple myeloma (MM). Objectives: To determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or optimal biological dose of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and clinical activity of MEDI-551. Methods: In this phase 1/2 open-label multicenter, global dose-escalation and expansion study, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, DLBCL, FL, or MM received MEDI-551 (at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg/kg) by intravenous infusion administered over 28-day cycles using standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose escalation continued until the MTD (≤12 mg/kg) was reached. Therapy continued for 2 cycles beyond complete response (CR), or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a MEDI-551-related adverse event (AE) that prevented completion of a full first cycle of MEDI-551, or as a grade 3 or higher toxicity (excluding hematologic toxicity) that could not be ascribed to another cause, such as disease progression or accident. Results: Of the 63 patients (CLL [12], DLBCL [23], FL [23], MM [5]) who received ≥1 dose of MEDI-551, 25 patients (CLL [3], DLBCL [6], FL [12], MM [4]) were enrolled in the phase 1 escalation portion (Jun 2010–Aug 2011). No MTD was achieved. The phase 2 expansion phase is ongoing. Median age of patients treated was 62 years. The median of completed treatment cycles was 4.0 with a maximum of 15 cycles. Dose intensity was approximately 98%. There were 6 deaths due to AEs (none were drug-related) and 9 subjects discontinued treatment (2 [neutropenia and infusion site reaction] were nonserious drug-related AEs). Most AEs were grade 1/2 with dose-independent frequency and severity (Table). 13 patients had serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); pneumonia, sepsis, and bacteremia in 1 patient were considered drug-related. 7 patients had grade 4 TEAEs (2 with neutropenia were drug-related) and 7 had grade 5 events, none related to drug. Of 43 patients in the evaluable for efficacy population (includes all patients who received any treatment of MEDI-551 and completed at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment), 5 had CR, 6 had partial responses (PR) and 21 had stable disease (SD; Figure 1). Median progression-free survival was ≈6 months (Figure 2). Conclusions: MEDI-551 demonstrated a safety profile warranting further study and no MTD was identified at the highest dose studied. The responses (CR: 11.6%; PR: 14.0%, objective response of 25.6% and SD of 48.8%) achieved in this single-agent study in heavily pretreated patients provide encouraging evidence of antitumor activity. Disclosures: Fanale: MedImmune: Research Funding. Kipps:MedImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gregory:MedImmune (ALLRESEARCH FINDING PROCEEDS GO TO RUSH UVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, NOT TOT ME PERSONALLY: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zhang:MedImmune: Employment. Goswami:MedImmune: Employment; AstraZeneca: Stocks, Stocks Other. Ibrahim:MedImmune: Employment; AstraZeneca: Stocks, Stocks Other. Yao:MedImmune: Employment. Herbst:MedImmune: Employment.

A Phase 1 Study of the DOT1L Inhibitor, Pinometostat (EPZ-5676), in Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia: Safety, Clinical Activity, Exposure and Target Inhibition

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2547-2547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
Raoul Tibes ◽  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Leukemia Cell ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Leukemia Cutis

Abstract Introduction: Aberrant fusion proteins involving the MLL histone methyltransferase (HMT) result in recruitment of another HMT, DOT1L, to a multi-protein complex. This leads to abnormal methylation of Histone H3 lysine 79 (H3K79) at MLL target genes and enhanced expression of leukemogenic genes such as HOXA9 and MEIS1 ( Krivstov, 2007). Pinometostat is a small molecule inhibitor of DOT1L with sub-nanomolar affinity and >37,000 fold selectivity against non-MLL HMTs. Pinometostat treatment of MLL-rearranged cells and xenografts reduced histone H3K79 methylation, decreased MLL target gene expression, and induced selective leukemia cell kill (Daigle, 2013). We report the safety, activity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) in the phase 1 trial of pinometostat in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) leukemia. Methods: This open label dose escalation/expansion study of pinometostat enrolled pts >18 years (yrs) with R/R leukemia (NCT01684150). In the dose-escalation phase, pts with AML, ALL, mixed lineage leukemia (MLL), myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative neoplasm or chronic myeloid leukemia were eligible. Eligibility in the two expansion cohorts: 90 mg/m2 (n = 17) and 54 mg/m2 (n = 6), was restricted to pts with MLL-r or MLL-partial tandem duplication (MLL-PTD). Pinometostat was given via continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) for 21 of 28 day cycles in the dose escalation phase and CIV for 28 of 28 day cycles in the expansion phases, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All pts underwent serial collection of PK and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) for PD. Leukemic blasts were isolated from PBMCs using flow cytometry and quantified for dimethylation of H3K79 (H3K79-me2) by ChIP-Seq. Results: As of 28-June-2015, 49 pts have enrolled in the dose escalation and expansion phases. Pts receiving 21/28 day infusions: 12 (n=1), 24 (n=5), 36 (n=4), 54 (n=6) and 80 mg/m2/day (n=3). Pts receiving 28/28 day infusions: 54 (n=6) and 90 mg/m2/day (n=24). Table 1. Patient Characteristics n (%) Median age, yrs (range) 51 (19 - 81) Sex (M / F) 27/22 Diagnosis MLL-r* 29 (59) AML MLL-PTD** 5 (9) MLL-wt 7 (14) ALL MLL-r* 5 (10) MLL-wt 1 (2) MLL MLL-r 1 (2) CMML MLL-r 1 (2) # of prior therapeutic regimens 1 - 2 29 (59) 3 - 4 18 (36) >4 2 (4) Prior allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant 20 (41) * centrally confirmed by karyotype/FISH ** centrally confirmed by NGS (next generation sequencing) Adverse events (AEs) reported in >15% of pts regardless of attribution were: nausea, constipation, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, fatigue, fever, peripheral edema, mucositis, febrile neutropenia, leukocytosis, anemia, cough, dyspnea, and pneumonia. Grade ≥3 non-hematologic related toxicities include: hypophosphatemia (n=1), decreased ejection fraction (n=3), or elevated transaminases (n=1). Nine patients had leukocytosis (absolute monocyte and neutrophil 50% above baseline and above upper limit of normal) or differentiation. The median days of pinometostat treatment was 35 days (range 3-189 days). To date, objective responses observed are morphologic CR (1 pt), cytogenetic CR (MLL negative by FISH) (1 pt), PR (1 pt) and resolution of leukemia cutis (3 pts). Dose proportional PK was observed with rapid attainment of steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) on Day 1 of treatment. Plasma Css correlated with inhibition of global H3K79-me2 in PBMCs. H3K79-me2 ChIP-Seq demonstrated pinometostat induced reductions in methylation at MLL -r target genes HOXA9 and MEIS1 (median inhibition = 61%: range = 13-91%) in all 9 pts analyzed to date from the 90 mg/m2 expansion cohort. Inhibition of H3K79-me2 in leukemic blasts is consistent with DOT1L suppression. PK-PD relationships in both expansion cohorts using both free and total plasma Css are being explored. Conclusions: Pinometostat administered as a CIV to adults with R/R leukemia has an acceptable safety profile. Clinical activity as demonstrated by both marrow responses and resolution of leukemia cutis were observed. In addition, analysis of H3K79-me2 by ChIP-Seq demonstrated PD reductions in the methylation of MLL-r target genes following pinometostat exposure, as expected from DOT1L inhibition. Relationships between PK exposure, reductions in pinometostat induced H3K79-me2 levels and clinical response are being interrogated. Disclosures Stein: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Rizzieri:Teva: Other: ad board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: ad board, Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding. Altman:Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Spectrum: Other: Advisory board; Ariad: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; BMS: Other: Advisory board; Astellas: Other: Participation in an advisory board December 2013. Thomson:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Blakemore:Epizyme: Employment. Daigle:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Fine:Epizyme: Employment. Waters:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Armstrong:Epizyme, Inc: Consultancy. Ho:Epizyme, Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals Preliminary Results from a Phase 1 Study of Gilteritinib in Combination with Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy in Subjects with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 722-722
Author(s):  
Keith Pratz ◽  
Mohamad Cherry ◽  
Jessica K. Altman ◽  
Brenda W. Cooper ◽  
Jose Carlos Cruz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
End Of Treatment

Abstract Background: Gilteritinib is a novel, potent, highly-selective oral fms -like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)/AXL inhibitor with clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML with activating FLT3-ITD and -TKD mutations. In such patients, once-daily gilteritinib ≥80 mg/day, as a single agent, elicited a response rate of 52% and median overall survival (OS) of 31 weeks (Perl AE, et al. Lancet Oncol . 2017.). Here we examined the safety/tolerability and antitumor activity of gilteritinib combined with front-line intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML patients. Methods: The primary objective of this open-label, dose-escalation/expansion Phase 1 study (NCT02236013) was to assess the safety/tolerability profile (including dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] and maximum tolerated dose [MTD]) of gilteritinib when combined with 7+3 induction and high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation, and administered as single-agent maintenance therapy in subjects aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed AML. Assessment of antitumor effects of this combination therapy was an exploratory objective. Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design where successive cohorts of 3-6 subjects received gilteritinib doses of 40, 80, or 120 mg/day. Dose-escalation decisions were made based on DLTs that occurred during remission induction. A DLT was defined as any grade ≥3 non-hematologic or extramedullary toxicity (with exceptions) or hematologic toxicity that occurred after the first gilteritinib dose and did not resolve by Day 42 of the last induction cycle or before initiation of consolidation therapy. Subjects received up to 2 cycles of a 7+3 induction regimen (cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day, days 1-7 plus idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day, days 1-3) plus once-daily oral gilteritinib, which was initially administered on days 1-14 but was subsequently changed to administration on days 4-17 at the designated dose. During consolidation, subjects received cytarabine (1.5 g/m2 every 12 hours, days 1, 3, and 5) and once-daily gilteritinib (days 1-14) at the induction dose, for up to 3 cycles. Subjects in the dose-expansion cohort, received gilteritinib at the recommended expansion dose established during dose escalation. After consolidation, subjects received maintenance therapy with once-daily gilteritinib (28-day cycles; up to 26 cycles). Results: As of July 9, 2017, 50 subjects had been enrolled (n=17, dose-escalation cohort; n=33, dose-expansion cohort); 49 had received at least 1 dose of gilteritinib. Most subjects were male (67.3%; n=33); median age was 59 years (range, 23-77 years). Of the 48 subjects with known FLT3 mutation status, 23 (47.9%) were FLT3mut+, of whom 15 (65.2%) had internal tandem duplications. During dose-escalation, 2 subjects in the 40 mg/day cohort who had received gilteritinib on days 1-14 experienced DLTs (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and decreased ejection fraction). After gilteritinib induction schedule modification, no additional DLTs were observed. The MTD was not reached; gilteritinib 120 mg/day was chosen as the recommended expansion dose. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in ≥10% of subjects were febrile neutropenia (53.1%), thrombocytopenia (18.4%), neutropenia (16.3%), decreased platelet count (12.2%), sepsis (10.2%), and decreased white blood cell count (10.2%). Serious drug-related TEAEs occurring in >1 subject were febrile neutropenia (16.3%), sepsis (6.1%), and decreased ejection fraction (4.1%). The end of treatment investigator-reported composite complete remission (CRc) rate for all subjects was 71.4% and 57.1% achieved complete remission (Table). In FLT3mut+ and FLT3 mutation-negative (FLT3mut−) subjects, end-of-treatment CRc rates were 91.3% and 56%, respectively. Among subjects who received ≥80 mg/day gilteritinib (n=40), end-of-treatment CRc rates were 90% (n=18/20) for FLT3mut+ and 60% (n=12/20) for FLT3mut− subjects. Median OS and duration of response have not been reached. For the total study population, median event-free survival (EFS) was 327 days and median disease-free survival (DFS) was 297 days; FLT3mut+ subjects had a longer median EFS (327 days) and DFS (134 days) than FLT3mut− subjects (EFS, 80 days; DFS, not estimable). Conclusions: In subjects with newly diagnosed AML, gilteritinib combined with intensive chemotherapy was well tolerated (MTD >120 mg/day) with seemingly high response rates in FLT3mut+ subjects. Disclosures Cherry: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman: NCCN: Other: Educational speaker; Syros: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Ceplene: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; ASH: Other: Educational speaker. Cooper: Novartis: Research Funding. Jurcic: Syros Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Levis: Astellas Pharma Us: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding. Lin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Perl: Arog Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Asana Biosciences: Other: Scientific advisory board; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board. Podoltsev: Alexion: Consultancy; CTI biopharma/Baxalta: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Schiller: Celator/Jazz: Research Funding. Liu: Astellas Global Pharma, Inc.: Employment. Bahceci: Astellas Pharma Global Development: Employment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document