Addition of Cyclophosphamide, on Demand, to Lenalidomide and Corticosteroids in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma, a Retrospective Review of a Single Centre Experience

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1842-1842
Author(s):  
Majed Alahmadi ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Eshetu G Atenafu ◽  
Limore Arones ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lower Upper ◽  
Start Date ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction The lenalidomide + dexamethasone combination (Len-dex) is an established regimen for myeloma patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory disease. In order to prolong the benefit of this effective regimen, the Myeloma Program at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre has routinely added a third agent, oral weekly cyclophosphamide (Cy), to Len-dex at the time of progression. We have now retrospectively analyzed the results of this pt cohort to assess the response rate (RR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of the Len-dex-Cy regimen subsequent to progression on Len-dex. Methods The Princess Margaret Myeloma Database identified 54 patients that received Len-dex-Cy for a minimum of 4 weeks following Len-dex as a doublet between 12/2007-12/2014. Hematologic responses were assessed using modified IMWG consensus criteria. Survival times were measured in months both from the start of Len-dex and the time of addition of Cy up to date of event of interest or end of follow-up. The impact of diagnostic and clinical variables on PFS and OS were also assessed in both cases using the log rank test. Results Baseline pt characteristics at addition of Cy included: median age 66 yrs; Hgb 107 g/L; creatinine 76 umol/L; albumin 36g/L; ANC 2.5 109/L; and median platelet count 158 109/L . Myeloma isotypes were IgG (61%), IgA (19%), and FLC (20%). The median number of prior regimens including Len-dex was 2; 80% pts had undergone prior ASCT. The dose of added Cy ranged between 250-500mg once weekly. Twenty-six percent patients experienced dose reductions primarily due to cytopenias. Overall, Len-dex-Cy was well tolerated with grade 3-4 toxicities in < 20% (Table 1). The mean duration of Len-Dex-Cy therapy was 8.9 months (range 0.9 - 37.7). The overall RR (≥ PR) was 41%; however clinical benefit was seen in 85% (≥ SD) pts. The median PFS was 8 months (95 % CI 5.8- 10.3 months) from addition of Cy and 25 months (95 % CI 17.3- 32.5 months) from start of Len-dex. The median OS was 24.5 months (95 % CI 15.2-41.8 months) from addition of Cy and 50.1 months (95 % CI 40.6-70.4 months) from start of Len-dex (Figure 1). Significant adverse factors for PFS were del(13q) from start of Len-dex and presence of anemia at the time of addition of Cy (p=0.027) and (p=0. 031) respectively. Decreased baseline serum albumin at the time of addition of Cy was identified as a significant factor for shorter OS (p=0.004). Conclusions 1) The addition of Cy in pts with myeloma progressing on Len-dex resulted in a clinically meaningful extension of disease control with an acceptable safety profile; 2) The effectiveness of adding a third agent to pts with progression on a doublet regimen raises the possibility that only a limited number of resistant myeloma clone(s) is/are responsible for the progression; 3) Although subject to many limitations, the results of this sequential "on demand" approach compare favorably with our previously reported phase 2 study of the Len+ prednisone+ Cy ("CPR") regimen in which triple-drug therapy was given throughout (PFS: 25 vs 16.1 months; OS: 50.1 vs 27.6 months) (Reece et al, Br J Haematol 2015; 168: 46-54); 4) future prospective studies evaluating a strategy of adding a third agent to a doublet ( such as Len-dex) "on demand" versus using triple therapy throughout the relapse would be worthwhile; a number of potential agents, including Cy as well as other newer anti-myeloma drugs, might be candidates for such studies. Table 1. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated with Len-Dex-Cy therapy in Len-dex relapsed patients Toxicity No. of patients (%) Grade 3-4 Thrombocytopenia 4 (7.7) Grade 3-4 Anemia 10 (18.8) Grade 3-4 Hematuria 1 (1.9) Febrile Neutropenia 2 (3.9) Infections 7 (12.9) Secondary Malignancy 2 (3.7) Table 2. Years PFS Rate 95% Confidence Interval Status Lower Upper Events so far Number at risk 1 0.8675 0.74204 0.93454 7 45 2 0.5591 0.41457 0.68112 23 29 3 0.3433 0.21795 0.47228 34 15 Table 3. Years OS Rate 95% Confidence Interval Status Lower Upper Events so far Number at risk 1 0.9426 0.83250 0.98114 3 48 2 0.7428 0.59831 0.84183 13 37 5 0.4136 0.25436 0.56596 25 11 Figure 1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) from the start date of Len-Dex Figure 1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) from the start date of Len-Dex Figure 2. OS of patients from start date of Len-Dex with 95% CI Figure 2. OS of patients from start date of Len-Dex with 95% CI Disclosures Chen: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen Ortho: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria. Tiedemann:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen Ortho: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Prica:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Reece:Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding.

Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil): Assessing the impact of dose related toxicities and progression free survival in (refractory) metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110179
Author(s):  
Olivia R Court
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Length Of Treatment ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

In the RECOURSE trial which lead to its accreditation, Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil) was shown to extend progression free survival (PFS) by 1.8 months in metastatic colorectal cancer. This Trust audit aims to assess the average quantity of cycles of Lonsurf received by participants and the length of time it extends PFS. Similarly, to identify how many participants required a dose-reduction or experienced toxicities which necessitated supportive therapies. Quantitative data was collected retrospectively from all participants who had received ≥1 cycle of Lonsurf from The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre (CCC) from 2016 until June 2020. Participant electronic patient records were accessed to identify toxicity grading, length of treatment received, the date progression was identified, if dose reductions were applied and if supportive therapies were administered. Lonsurf extends PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at CCC by 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.73–3.27) and average treatment length was 2.4 months. However, 78 participants (41.5%) received a dose reduction due to toxicities. A total of 955 toxicities were recorded by participants; the most commonly reported toxicities irrespective of grade were fatigue (33.8%), diarrhoea (13.8%) and nausea (12.3%). The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were constipation and infection. The most frequently utilised supportive therapies were loperamide (49.6%) and domperidone (49.1%). Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) was required by patients on 5 occasions (0.3%) in total. Lonsurf extends median PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by 3.0 months. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities which necessitated supportive therapies or a dose reduction were gastrointestinal and infection.

scholarly journals Time to Progression Post-Induction Predicts Outcomes of Ixazomib Based Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma: Real World Data from a Multi-Site Israeli Registry Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1972-1972
Author(s):  
Yael C Cohen ◽  
Hila Magen ◽  
Noa Lavi ◽  
Moshe E. Gatt ◽  
Evgeni Chubar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Target Organ Damage ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Indolent Disease

Abstract Introduction Ixazomib is an orally available proteasome inhibitor, shown to be safe and efficacious in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd regimen) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 1-3 prior lines, demonstrating a progression free survival (PFS) benefit which was similar across cytogenetic risk groups (Tourmaline-MM1 phase 3 trial). A European real world data analysis of an IRd named patient program (NPP) outcomes in Greece (n=35), UK (n=46) and Check republic (n=57) showed similar favorable outcomes (Terpos et al, Blood 2017 130:3087). We aimed to analyze outcomes of ixazomib combinations among a multi-site cohort in the Israeli Myeloma registry. Overall response rate (ORR) was classified according to IMWG criteria. Primary endpoint was PFS, secondary endpoints included ORR, overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability. Patients A total of 78 patients across 7 sites, who received at least one cycle of ixazomib combination between June 2013 and June 2018 for treatment of RRMM were retrospectively included. Median age was 68 (range: 38-90). Male/Female ratio was 42/36. ISS (rISS) I/II/II was 30%/42%/27% (25%/54%/15%). Patient received between 1 and 7 prior lines of therapy, 66% received ixazomib in 2nd line, 18% in 3rd line. Overall, 89% of patients had been exposed to PIs (bortezomib 86%) prior to IRd, 41% to IMiDs (thalidomide 28% lenalidomide 22% and pomalidomide 6%), and 35% had undergone autologous transplantation (ASCT). Induction treatment was mostly bortezomib based (85%), most frequently VCD (62%). FISH cytogenetics were available for 60 patients, 29 (48%) had high or intermediate risk aberrations (t(4:14) 12 pts, amp 1q21 12 pts, del17p 9 pts). Disease aggressiveness was classified by treating physician as indolent (rapid control to protect from target organ damage not required) vs aggressive (imminent target organ damage) in 63% vs 27%, respectively. 60 (77%) of the 78 patients received ixazomib via a named patient program, the rest via national or private healthcare provider. Results Median time of follow up from first ixazomib dose was 22 months (range: 1-39 months), and 54 months from diagnosis of myeloma. Treatment is ongoing in 44 (56%) patients with a median duration of 19 months (range: 1-29). Among patients who discontinued treatment, the median duration was 9 months (1-31). Ixazomib was combined with lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and daratumumab in 69%, 9% and 4%, respectively. Overall response rate was 88% - CR 10%, VGPR 36%, PR 42%. Progression free survival was 78% and 54% at 12 and 24 months, respectively (fig1a). A worse PFS was found with physician assessment of aggressive vs indolent disease (14.5 vs 25.9 months, p=0.001), and with post induction progression free period (PFS1) ≤ 24 months vs. >24 months (23.9 vs 31.5 months, p=0.038) (fig 1b); age >=65 trended towards a worse PFS (p=0.058). Poor cytogenetic risk, prior exposure to bortezomib, prior auto transplant, and number of prior lines of therapy did not affect PFS or ORR. OS from first ixazomib administration was 90% and 81% at 12 and 24 months, respectively; median OS was not reached (fig1a). Any (grade 3-4) toxicity considered by investigator as related to ixazomib was reported in 70% (18% grade 3-4), including neutropenia 14% (6%), anemia 19% (6%), thrombocytopenia 17% (5%), nausea and vomiting 17% (1%), DVT/PE 4% (1%), neutropenic infection 0 (4%), peripheral neuropathy 14% (3%), diarrhea 14% (3%), rash 10% (4%), pneumonia 5% (3%). There were no ixazomib related deaths. Dose reduction or discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 28% and 12%, respectively. Conclusion Our data shows ixazomib-based combinations are efficacious and safe regimens for patients with RRMM, achieving ORR of 88%, at 2nd as well as later lines of therapy, regardless to cytogenetic risk. Over a median follow up of almost 2-years, 54% remained progression free at 24 months. An ixazomib based regimen may be particularly attractive for patients who remain progression free for more than 24 months after a bortezomib induction and for patients with a more indolent disease phenotype. Disclosures Cohen: Neopharm Israel: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medisson Israel: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Tadmor:NOVARTIS: Consultancy; PFIEZER: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; JNJ: Consultancy; ROCHE: Research Funding.

Meta Analysis of Grade 3 and/or 4 Toxicities in Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (LG-NHL) Patients Receiving Maintenance Rituximab (MR) Therapy: Impact of Schedule on Toxicity

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2704-2704
Author(s):  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Dana Villines ◽  
Tina V. Valdez ◽  
Michele Ghielmini ◽  
Shu-Fang Hsu Schmitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2704 Background: MR has improved the outcome and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in front-line and relapsed settings. However, maintenance schedules have been empirically designed based on either B-cell depletion kinetics or rituximab levels, with no consensus on the optimal regimen. Overall, toxicities have been predictable and tolerable but the impact of MR schedule on toxicities has not been previously reported and could influence selection of maintenance regimens. Methods: Using PubMed, prospective clinical trials employing MR were identified. Data presented in abstract form or at meetings were deemed incomplete and thus excluded. Data were analyzed from published manuscripts as percentages of subjects experiencing an adverse event (AE). Percentages were considered as the unit of analysis as this adjusted for the uneven sample sizes. Data were collected for overall Grade 3 and/or Grade 4 toxicity (AE reported at any phase of treatment) and was further categorized as AE occurring during initial treatment or during MR. Grade 1 and 2 toxicities were excluded from meta-analysis, given lack of consistent reporting. No grade 5 toxicities were reported. The incidence, severity, and type of toxicity was analyzed by type of induction (Rituximab (R) vs. R plus chemotherapy), histology (FL vs. FL plus other LG-NHL), setting (front-line vs. relapsed), and MR schedule (one dose every 2 months vs. one dose every 3 months vs. 4 doses every 6 months). Results: Nine clinical trials involving 1,928 patients were included in this Meta analysis (4 of which were randomized controlled in the MR phase). Of those, 1,004 patients received MR. The mean percentage of Grade 3/4 toxicities during any phase of treatment was 26% (95% CI = 0.12–51.88) but when restricted to the MR phase; it was 12.88% (95% CI = 6.50–19.26). Toxicities were numerically higher in patients receiving R induction plus chemotherapy versus R induction alone and in patients receiving MR for relapsed disease versus newly diagnosed patients, but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.661 and 0.517, respectively). However, patients receiving MR every 2 months were significantly more likely to develop grade 3 and 4 toxicities compared to patients receiving MR every 6 months (P = 0.005). No statistical differences were demonstrated between the 2 vs. 3 months schedules or when comparing the 3 vs. 6 months schedules (P = 0.342 and 0.267, respectively) (Table 1). Statistically significant differences were also found in studies restricted to FL versus others allowing non-FL histologies (P = 0.025) with the FL patients experiencing more toxicity than others. The most frequently reported toxicities were neutropenia and infections. There were no treatment-related deaths in any of the arms. Conclusions: Approximately 13% of patients receiving MR experience grade 3 and/or 4 toxicities, mainly consisting of neutropenia and infections. MR given every 6 months appears to provide the least grade 3 and 4 toxicities. There is a suggestion of increased toxicity in FL histologies. It is important to note that this meta-analysis did not address efficacy and only a true comparative trial can definitively establish the relative risk/benefit ratios amongst MR schedules. Disclosures: Nabhan: Genentech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ghielmini:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Smith:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine and Prednisone Plus Rituximab (CHOP-R) in Fludarabine (F) Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or CLL with Autoimmune Cytopenia (AIC) or Richter's Transformation (RT): Final Analysis of a Phase II Study of the German CLL Study Group

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2860-2860
Author(s):  
Petra Jenke ◽  
Barbara Eichhorst ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Nadine Anheier ◽  
Ulrich Duehrsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Richter's Transformation ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2860 Introduction: In the last decade, important progress has been achieved in the treatment of CLL through the use of purine analog-based chemoimmunotherapies. Several conditions remain a challenge, often with a poor outcome. Amongst these therapeutic problems are Richter's transformation (RT), refractoriness to F-based therapies (Fref), and the occurrence of AIC, which are sometimes induced by F. Fref and RT pts have a very poor prognosis with an estimated overall survival (OS) of only 10 and 8 months (mos), respectively. Therefore, therapeutic alternatives are urgently warranted. CHOP-R has improved the outcome of pts with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. To test the efficacy and tolerability of the CHOP-R regimen in CLL patients with RT, Fref, or AIC, the GCLLSG initiated a prospective phase II trial. Material and Methods: 62 patients were included in the study. Due to protocol violations, 2 patients were excluded. Within the group of Fref pts, the medical review detected 11 patients who had received pre-treatment with F (Fpret), but were not refractory according to the updated guidelines (Hallek et al., Blood 2008). Thus, 26 pts were classified as Fref/pret, 19 pts as AIC and 15 pts as RT. All patients received CHOP every 3 weeks (cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, adriamycin 50mg/m2 and vincristine 1, 4mg/m2 d1; prednisone 100mg/m2 d1–5). Rituximab was added starting with the 2nd cycle (375mg/m2 on each d0, and 21 days after the last CHOP-R). RT pts received up to 8, Fref/pret and AIC up to 6 courses of CHOP-R. In case of PD after 3 cycles, pts went off-study. The primary endpoints were remission rate, quality and duration of response. Results: 79%, 73%, and 40% of AIC, Fref/pret, and RT pts were male, respectively. The median age was 65 years (y) for Fref/pret-pts, 66y in the AIC and 69y in the RT group. Binet stages for Fref/pret pts were: A: 8%; B: 27% C: 65 %. All but 3 AIC pts were at Binet stage C. Initial RT stages according to Ann Arbor were: II: 13%, III: 13%, IV 73%. The median number of previous therapies were 3 for Fref/pret, 2 for AIC and 2 for RT. A total of 314 cycles were administered, with a median number of 3 cycles for AIC and Fref pts and a median number of 4 cycles for the RT group. Due to toxicity 73% of cycles in the Fref/pret group, 66% in the AIC and 87% in the RT group were dose-reduced. 69% of Fref/pret-pts and 58% of AIC-pts received full 6 cycles of therapy and only 40% of RT-pts completed 8 cycles of therapy. Treatment was stopped in 6 pts because of PD. Due to treatment related toxicity treatment was stopped in 16 pts (27%). Treatment related mortality was 3% (2 pts). Treatment toxicity was reported according to NCI common toxicity criteria (CTC) version 2.0. Adverse events grade 3 or 4 for anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were documented in 75%, 55% and 65% of patients, respectively. Infections were the most common non-hematologic toxicity and occurred in 67%; severe infections CTC grade 3 or 4 occurred in 28%. All 26 Fref/pret-pts were available for response evaluation. CHOP-R achieved 54% PR, 35% SD and 12% PD. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median treatment-free survival (TFS) were 11 and 14 mos. OS was 27 mos with a significant difference concerning F-ref (n=15) and F-pret (n=11) pts (17 vs. 35m; p=0.05). We evaluated the response of all 15 RT-pts with 60% PR, 7% CR, 13% SD and 20% PD. The PFS was 15 mos, TFS was 17 mos and OS 27 mos. 17 AIC pts were available for response evaluation with 82% PR, 6% SD and 12% PD. The PFS and TFS were only 14 and 16 mos. The OS was 50 mos. The population had a high incidence of unfavourable genetic markers: deletion of chromosome 17p [del(17p)] was detected in 24%, del(11q) in 34% and unmutated IGHV in 70%. 85% had high levels of serum thymidine kinase (sTK > 10 U/l), and 49% had high levels of ß2-microglobulin (ß2M > 3.5 mg/l). Patients with del(17p) had an unfavourable response rate and achieved significant less a PR or CR (36% vs. 76%; p=0.03). Multivariate analyses showed that del(17p) and ECOG performance status had a negative prognostic impact on OS (p<0.0001). Moreover the presence of a del(17p) predicted a short PFS (6 vs. 16.9 mos; p=0.001). Conclusion: CHOP-R achieves promising response rates in CLL patients with Fref and RT and very good response rates in patients with AIC. However, the progression-free survival and overall survival remain unsatisfactory. Therefore, CHOP-R might be used as induction therapy prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in physically fit patients. Disclosures: Eichhorst: Hoffmann La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Grants; Mundipharma: Research Funding, Travel Grants; Gilead: Consultancy. Dreyling:Roche: Research Funding, Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Bergmann:Celgene: Honoraria. Stilgenbauer:Hoffmann La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel Grants. Fink:Hoffmann La Roche: travel grants. Fischer:Hoffmann La Roche:. Wendtner:Hofmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hallek:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Impact of Early Switching to Nilotinib As Second Line TKI in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Were Intolerant to, Suboptimal to and Failed Imatinib: The Thai Multi-Centered Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4267-4267
Author(s):  
Pongtep Viboonjuntra ◽  
Arnuparp Lekhakula ◽  
Kanchana Chansung ◽  
Chittima Sirijerachai ◽  
Pimjai Niparuck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction : To date, the ELN recommendation and NCCN guidelines are the principle mile stones to follow up the treatment response and to make the decision of TKIs switching. However, in real life practice, many factors influence changing the real switching date from the date had an indication. This study aims to analyze the impact of early switching to second line TKI, nilotinib, in real life practice, for the CML patients who failed, had sub-optimal response or were intolerant to imatinib. Methods : This prospective study was conducted through 7 medical centers in Thailand between 1st of September 2009 and 31st of August 2011. Adult CML patients of age ≥ 18 years old, in chronic and accelerated phase, who had failure, suboptimal response or intolerance to imatinib, based on ELN 2009 guideline, were included and were eligible with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. Prospective data collection for 24 months of each patient was performed. The main objective was to identify the impact of early switching to nilotinib on major molecular response (MMR). The other objectives were to observe the efficacy of nilotinib including overall survival, progression free survival and the safety. The survival results were presented as Kaplan-Meier survival curves. For the comparison of the treatment groups, the Kaplan-Meier estimator with the corresponding log-rank test for equality of survivor functions across treatment group was applied. Results : The final 108 cases were analysed. The median age was 47 (17-79) years with the proportion of male to female of 1.4:1 respectively. The median duration of the prior imatinib treatment was 18 months (2-142 months). The median duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching was 3.1 months (0-62.8 months) with 50% changing less than 3 months, 26.9% between 3 months and 12 months, and 23.1% changing longer than 12 months. The indication of switching included 63.6% failure to imatinib, 29% intolerance to imatinib and 7.4% suboptimal to imatinib. On the nilotinib switching, 70.4% completed 24 months follow-up, and 29.6% discontinued treatment mostly because of unsatisfactory results or adverse events. Evaluation was made every 3 months based on 2009 ELN recommendation. At 3 months, 57%, 20%, and 8% of the patients achieved CHR, CCyR and MMR, respectively. Those who did not achieve CHR at 3 months never achieved MMR, while 86 % of those who achieved CCyR at 3 months achieved MMR. All CML achieving MMR at 3 months had sustained MMR throughout the study period (24 months). Imatinib suboptimal response had better outcome than imatinib failure and imatinib intolerance groups. A preliminary analysis of BCR-ABL mutation was performed on 90 cases, and mutations were found on 21 cases. Two of them were T315I which were excluded from the study. The cases with mutation had poorer response to treatment than those without mutation. There was one case with initial G250E mutation developing T315I mutation after treatment with nilotinib. At 24 months, one case progressed to accelerated phase and 3 cases progressed to blastic transformation. The 2-year overall survival and 2-year progression-free survival and were 98.9% and 96.9% (figure 1 and 2), respectively. The interquatile analysis was done to identify the groups of cumulative MMR according to the duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching to nilotinib. The patients who switched to nilotinib within 12 months after date of indication could have a greater chance to achieved MMR than those who switched treatment later than 12 months (p(log-rank) = 0.002) (figure 3). Skin rash, musculoskeletal pain, and infection were the three most common non-hematologic adverse events, However, most of them were grade 1-2, except for 4 cases with grade 3-4 infections. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%) and leucopenia (4%), and most of them were manageable. Although biochemical abnormalities were commonly found, most of them were mild. Conclusions : Nilotinib, as a second line treatment showed excellent efficacy and tolerability. Indication for nilotinib treatment, initial mutation status and depth of response at 3 months after treatment can predict outcomes of the patients. However, the patients will have a greater chance to achieve MMR if they switched to nilotinib within 12 months after the date of indication for changing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Combined Treatment of Bortezomib, Continuous Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Followed By One Year of Maintenance Treatment for Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4733-4733
Author(s):  
Esther GM Waal de ◽  
Linda Munck de ◽  
Gerhard Woolthuis ◽  
Annet velden Van Der ◽  
Yvonne Tromp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

Abstract Introduction: Combination therapy for longer periods but at low dose, also called metronomic scheduling, might be an effective manner to treat patients with relapsing myeloma. In particular if the used agents attack the malignant clone in an alternative manner. Therefore we used the combination of bortezomib, dexametasone and daily low dose of oral cyclophosphamide as an induction regimen followed by one year of maintenance therapy consisting of bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. Methods: Relapsing myeloma patients, bortezomib naïve, were treated with three cycles of 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib at day 1, 4, 8 and 11, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily, and 20 mg dexamethasone at day 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 followed by three cycles of bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 (day 1, 8, 15 and 2), cyclophosphamide (50 mg) daily and dexamethasone (20 mg) at day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23. Maintenance therapy consisting of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every two weeks and daily dose of 50 mg cyclophosphamide for one year was applied to patients in partial or complete remission. Primary endpoints were toxicity during re-induction and maintenance therapy. Secondary endpoints were response to treatment and progression free and overall survival. Results: 59 patients with relapsing multiple myeloma were included of whom 69% were in first relapse (Table 1). The upfront treatment consisted mainly of thalidomide-based and vincristine-based chemotherapy and 40% of the patients have been treated with an autologous stem cell transplantation. All 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy could be given in 49% of the patients. Premature discontinuation before starting maintenance therapy was due to toxicity (31%), progressive disease (7%), death (7%) or other reasons (6%). Myelosuppression was the most common side effect with WHO grade 3-4 in 31% of the patients. Neuropathy grade 3-4 was observed in 16% of patients, partially due to the fact that bortezomib was given intravenously during the first 2 yrs of the protocol which included 76% of the patients. Maintenance therapy was started in 47% of the patients with a median duration of 7.3 months (range 0.36.-13.4). Grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 25% of the patients including infections (n=3) and myelosuppression (n=3) which did not resulted in discontinuation of therapy. Median follow up time was 29 months with an overall response of 62%, and a very good partial response (VGPR), complete remission (CR) in 21% and 7% of the patients respectively. During the maintenance phase an improvement in responsiveness was observed in 25% of the patients. The CR rate increased with 9% to a total of 16%. VGPR rate was 20% and 16% of the patient had a PR. At end of the maintenance therapy 50% of patients started with maintenance had stable disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 17.2 months (range 0.13 – 43.5) as depicted in figure 1. and the median overall survival was 21.6 months (range 0.46-54.4, figure 2). During follow up 33 % of the patients died due to progression of MM. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that combination therapy with bortezomib, continuous low dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is an effective and manageable regimen. Adding a year of maintenance was feasible with limited side effects and an increase in CR rate. Table 1: patient characteristics Patients (%) Age, mean (min,max) 69 (46-86) Sex Male 56 Female 44 Relapse number First relapse 75 Second relapse 20 Third relapse 5 Performance status 0 65 1 29 2 5 M-protein heavy chain IgA 18 IgG 65 Light chain disease 18 Polyneuropathy No 61 Yes 39 Figure 1: Progression free survival Figure 1:. Progression free survival Figure 2: Overall survival Figure 2:. Overall survival Disclosures Waal de: Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Munck de:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Woolthuis:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. velden Van Der:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Tromp:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Hoogendoorn:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Vellenga:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding. Hovenga:Jansen Cilag: Research Funding.

Sequential RCHOP, Radioimmunotherapy and Rituximab Maintenance Improves Early Outcomes in Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma: 5 Year Outcomes from SWOG 0801

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 614-614
Author(s):  
Paul M. Barr ◽  
Hongli Li ◽  
Richard Burack ◽  
Michael LeBlanc ◽  
Sonali M. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Secondary Malignancies ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Despite an abundance of effective therapeutic options, advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) remains incurable. Further, prospective trials consistently demonstrate that 20% of patients relapse within 2 years and ultimately have an inferior survival (Casulo 2015). Maintenace rituximab following chemoimmunotherapy induction is able to delay disease progression but has not demonstrated a benefit in overall survival (Salles 2011). Additionally, radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is one of the most effective single agent options in FL but is not commonly utilized as part of upfront treatment. As such, the role of both remains unclear. Based on results demonstrated with RIT consolidation in SWOG 0016 and the efficacy of rituximab maintenance, SWOG 0801 was designed as a phase 2 single arm trial, conducted to evaluate the utility of consolidative RIT and sequential maintenance rituximab following chemoimmunotherapy induction. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with treatment naïve stage III/IV or bulky stage II FL received RCHOP for 6 cycles (without rituximab for the last 2 cycles) followed by iodine-131 tositumomab and subsequent rituximab administered every 3 months for up to 4 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years. Secondary endpoints included 5-year overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: Of 87 pts registered to this study, 85 were deemed eligible following central pathologic review. One additional patient withdrew consent and received no treatment on protocol. Of the 84 evaluable patients, the median age was 52 years (range 29 - 80) ) and 18%, 40%, and 42%had low, intermediate and high risk FLIPI scores, respectively. Seventy-three pts completed RCHOP and I-131 tositumomab. Grade ≥3 AEs occurring ≥5% of pts included neutropenia (57%), leukopenia (40%), thrombocytopenia (20%), febrile neutropenia (17%), fatigue (10%), neuropathy (8%), anemia (7%) and hyperglycemia (5%). Reasons for discontinuation included refusal of tositumumab (6 pts), prolonged myelosuppression (2 pts), ascites (1pt), inability to provide tositumumab (1 pt), and an unrelated lower extremity wound (1 pt). Following induction and RIT, 59 complete responses and 23 partial responses were observed, for a ORR of 99% (95% CI: 93.5%, 99.9%) Sixty nine eligible patients registered to maintenance therapy with 42 completing the 4 year treatment plan. The only grade ≥3 AE that occurred in ≥5% of pts was leukopenia (5%). Twenty-seven pts discontinued maintenance therapy, including 11 in the first 2 years and 16 in the last 2 years, due to the following reasons: infection (8 pts), patient preference (8 pts), deaths (2 pts), treatment delay (2 pts), secondary solid tumors (2 pts), bowel perforation (1 pt), joint pain (1 pt), hepatic transaminase elevation (1 pt), insurance refusal (1 pt), and dose error (1 pt). Four additional secondary malignancies were reported following completion of therapy including solid tumors (3 pts) and AML (1 pt). To date, 9 deaths have occurred due to secondary malignancies (3 pts), unknown etiology (3 pts), cardiac arrest (2 pts) and non-alcoholic cirrhosis (1 pt). After median follow-up of 5.6 years (range 3-7 years), 17 events have occurred including 9 pts experiencing progressive FL resulting in a progression free survival of 90% (95% CI: 81.9%, 95.1%) at 3 years and 84%(95% CI: 74.5%, 90.6%) at 5 years (Figure). Three-year overall survival is 96% (95% CI: 89.3%, 98.8%) and 5-year overall survival is 94% (95% CI: 86.2%, 97.5%). Conclusions: SWOG 0801 demonstrates near universal responses following chemoimmunotherapy and RIT. This sequential therapeutic strategy appears to improve early outcomes as 94% of pts are without disease progression at 2 years, consistent with the best results ever demonstrated for FL in the National Clinical Trials Network. However, the majority of discontinuations occurred during maintenance suggesting that rituximab over a 4-year span is not feasible for many patients due to cumulative toxicity. Future studies investigating precision strategies in high-risk FL may consider an aggressive chemoimmunotherapy induction and RIT consolidation platform to overcome early FL progression given these promising outcomes. Support: NIH/NCI grants CA180888, CA180819, and in part by GlaxoSmithKline. Figure. Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Figure. Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Disclosures Barr: Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy. Smith:Amgen: Other: Educational lecture to sales force; Juno: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Other: on a DSMB for two trials ; TGTX: Consultancy. Gopal:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy. Persky:Merck: Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Press:Roche / Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fisher:Gilead: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy. Friedberg:Bayer: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee.

scholarly journals Bortezomib and High Dose Melphalan (Bor-HDM) Compared to HDM Conditioning for the Treatment of Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma: Report from a Single Center

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3189-3189
Author(s):  
Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Peter Duggan ◽  
Paola Neri ◽  
Ahsan Chaudhry ◽  
Marcia Culham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Dose Melphalan ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Preclinical and clinical data suggest that bortezomib in combination with high-dose melphalan (Bor-HDM) provides with a synergistic effect able to improve the quality of response for MM patients undergoing auto-SCT. In the present study, we aimed to assess the impact of Bor-HDM conditioning on ORR, and MRD negativity for MM patients undergoing single auto-SCT at our Institution. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent single auto-SCT at Tom Baker Cancer Center (TBCC) from 01/2004 to 06/2015 using Bor-HDM or HDM as conditioning regimen were evaluated. Definitions of response and progression were used according to the EBMT modified criteria and a category of very good partial response (VGPR) was added. MRD negativity was assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry. All patients received induction chemotherapy before undergoing auto-SCT. Bortezomib was administered intravenously at 1-1.3 mg/m2 on days −5, −2, 1, and 4, while melphalan was given at 200 mg/m2 on day −1. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Results Two-hundred and fifty-eight consecutive patients receiving Bor-HDM or HDM alone were evaluated. A total of 85 patients received Bor-HDM conditioning and 173 received HDM. Clinical characteristics and chemotherapy induction regimens are listed in Table 1. At day-100 post auto-SCT a ³VGPR was seen in 83.3% in the Bor-HDM group compared to 67.6% for HDM patients. The CR/nCR rate was higher in the Bor-HDM group (47.6% vs 23.6%) as well as MRD negativity assessed by flow cytometry (30.9% vs 9.7%, p=0.0001). Median OS in the Bor-HDM group was NR compared to 95 months for HDM alone (p=0.572), while median PFS was 39.3 months for Bor-HDM compared to 27 months for HDM (p=0.1). Median OS was shorter in the HR cytogenetic group regardless of the type of conditioning regimen employed (39 months vs NR for SR cytogenetics). In addition, patients who achieved MRD negativity, exhibited a longer OS (NR vs 78 months, p=0.007). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was similar between both groups (p0.5). In conclusion, Bor-HDM is a safe and efficacious conditioning regimen able to increase the nCR/CR and MRD negativity rates compared to HDM. Further studies are warranted to explore this regimen, especially when other upfront therapies are employed, with special view on the high-risk MM patients where response rates are good but sustainability remains an issue. Table 1. Clinical Characteristics Characteristic Bor/HDM, N=85 HDM alone, N=173 Age (median) 58 59 GenderMaleFemale 51 (60%)34 (40%) 113 (65.3%)60 (34.7%) Hb (g/L) 112 117 Calcium (µmol/L) 2.25 2.29 Creatinine (µmol/L) 85 80 B2microglobulin (µmol/L) 3.3 2.79 Albumin (g/L) 31 35 Stage IStage IIStage III 154723 617333 M-spike (g/L) 34 30 LDH (IU/L) 194 180 BMPC (%) 40 33 Heavy chain:IgGIgAIgDFLC onlyBiclonalIgM 491811511 1142403210 Light chain:KappaLambdaBiclonal 50351 124471 High riskStandard risk 2263 36135 InductionCyBorDVDDexamethasoneRVD 4524016 16544315 Figure 1. Overall Survival for patients with MM undergoing single auto-SCT according to the type of conditioning regimen Figure 1. Overall Survival for patients with MM undergoing single auto-SCT according to the type of conditioning regimen Figure 2. Progression-Free survival for patients with MM undergoing single auto-SCT according to the type of conditioning regimen Figure 2. Progression-Free survival for patients with MM undergoing single auto-SCT according to the type of conditioning regimen Figure 3. Overall Survival for patients with MM undergoing single auto-SCT according to MRD negativity assessed by flow cytometry Figure 3. Overall Survival for patients with MM undergoing single auto-SCT according to MRD negativity assessed by flow cytometry Disclosures Jimenez-Zepeda: Celgene: Honoraria; J&J: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Duggan:Jansen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Neri:Celgene: Research Funding. Bahlis:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding.

Outcome of patients with recurrent/refractory osteosarcoma enrolled in three recent phase II trials: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11530-11530
Author(s):  
Seema Rao ◽  
Ruxu Han ◽  
Mark D. Krailo ◽  
Allen Buxton ◽  
Pooja Hingorani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
The Impact

11530 Background: Based on seven prior Phase 2 Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trials, the 4-month event-free survival(EFS) and associated confidence interval for relapsed osteosarcoma with measurable disease according to RECIST was determined to be 12% (95% CI 6 - 19%). Three prospective clinical trials were conducted using this historical benchmark to detect activity defined by an EFS improvement of double the upper confidence interval. This report summarizes the outcome of these studies, describes whether the historical data remains an accurate baseline, and considers implications for future phase II trial study design in relapsed osteosarcoma measurable according to RECIST. Methods: We conducted an analysis of outcome for patients with recurrent/refractory osteosarcoma enrolled in three recent prospective COG phase II trials; AOST1321 (unresected cohort), AOST1322 and AOST1521 that used EFS at 4 months as the primary endpoint. Patients were eligible if they had osteosarcoma that had recurred or become refractory after standard therapy and had measurable disease according to RECIST. We assessed whether risk of an EFS event is modified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, number of prior chemotherapy regimens, or time to first relapse. Results: In each of the three phase II trials (unresected group of AOST1321, AOST1322, AOST1521), the drugs tested (denosumab, eribulin and glembatumumab) were concluded to be not effective due to a failure of the patient populations to meet the prespecified active 4-month progression free survival endpoint. The 4-month EFS for the 57 evaluable patients enrolled on these trials was 7% (95% CI 2 – 16%), similar to the 4-month EFS for 96 patients in the previous seven phase II trials of 12% (95% CI 6 - 19%). The combined EFS at 4 months for all 10 studies is 10% (95% CI 6 – 15%).There was no significant difference in EFS across trials based on age, sex, ethnicity, number of prior treatment regimens, consistent with prior analysis. Data from AOST1321 and AOST1521 were analyzed to determine the impact of time to first recurrence on EFS. Two different quantifications were applied: 1 year or less versus 2 or more years; and 2 years or less versus 3 years or more. Neither categorization was statistically significant. Conclusions: The EFS at 4 months in the three new phase II trials is similar to the previous seven phase II single arm trials. The combined analysis of 153 patients from 10 trials tightens the confidence interval, moving the upper 95% CI to 15%. Modification to future study designs could be considered based on this updated analysis. EFS at 4 months remains a robust primary endpoint. Single-arm trials using this endpoint based on the historical benchmark have accrued rapidly and allowed assessment of multiple novel agents in osteosarcoma. The negative trial results and continued poor outcome highlight the need for new approaches for relapsed osteosarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02097238, NCT02470091, NCT02487979.

Very Good Partial Response and Complete Response Predict Superior Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival After Single Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Multiple Myeloma,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4111-4111
Author(s):  
Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Andrew Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4111 In multiple myeloma (MM), the impact of complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR) achievement has been shown mostly after introduction of high dose therapy (HDT) supported by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Recently, the IFM group reported the impact of achievement of CR and VGPR in double ASCT. The purpose of this study is to confirm the prognostic value of CR/VGPR in a large group of patients treated with single ASCT. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent single ASCT at Princess Margaret Hospital between January 2000 and December 2007 were evaluated. Patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF and majority were conditioned with melphalan 200mg/m2. Response to therapy was assessed according to the IMWC including VGPR. Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were measured from transplant date to the date of death or last follow-up. OS and DFS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier Method. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess CR and VGPR and some other prognostic markers at presentation such as age, B2Mg> 460 μmol/L, LDH> 350 IU/L, CRP> 20mg/L, albumin<35g/L and creatinine > 200 μmol/L. All p-values were 2-sided and statistically significant if <0.05. Results 788 patients were identified for the study; their median age was 56 years (30–73). Patient's characteristics are listed in Table 1. Response was assessed at day 100 after ASCT and showed a CR of 6%, PR of 37.5%, and VGPR of 53% (Overall Response rate of 95.5%). Median OS and PFS for the group were 77.43 months and 20.63 months respectively. The median OS and PFS were significantly better for patients who achieved CR/VGPR, 104.5 months versus 51.7 months, and 26.3 months versus 13.53 months respectively. With a median follow-up of 44 months there is no significant difference in OS for those patients who achieved VGPR/CR after induction therapy with novel agents. However, PFS is better in those patients receiving novel agents who achieved VGPR/CR (Median PFS of 24.63months versus 12.4 months respectively (p=0.01). Multivariate analysis shows CR/VGPR as an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS (Fig 1 and 2). B2Mg> 460 μmol/L, LDH> 350 IU/L, CRP > 20mg/L, albumin<35g/L and creatinine > 200 μmol/L failed to be important factor for survival in the multivariate analysis. Our data suggests that VGPR/CR is clearly important in the pre-novel agents era and for the smaller group of patients who had novel agents induction there is a benefit in PFS and with a longer follow-up perhaps in OS. In conclusion, VGPR/CR remains a simple and powerful indicator in the context of single ASCT and should be considered a relevant objective for MM treatment. Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with Multiple Myeloma undergoing single ASCT Clinical characteristic N=788 Median Range % Age (years) 58 31–74 Male 59.4% Female 40.6% Hemoglobin (g/L) 114 54–180 Creatinine (μmol/L) 107 28–1409 B2-microglobulin ((μmol/L) (N=718) 508 260–7270 Albumin (g/L) (N=650) 38 23–54 IgG 51.1% IgA 31.3% IgM 0.4% IgD 0.7% Biclonal 9.9% Not Detected 6.6 Kappa 59.4% Lambda 32.9% Biclonal 2% Not Detected 5.7% Calcium (μmol/L) 2.29 1.62–4.66 LDH (IU/L) (N=754) 235 50–1470 Induction Treatment: 52.2% VAD 22.8% Dexamethasone 6.3% TD 2.3% CP 3.8% DPACE/DTPACE 1.7% DVD 8% CyBORD 2% VD Ab: VAD: Vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone, TD: Thalidomide and Dexamethasone; CP: Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone, DVD: Doxil, Velcade and Dexamethasone, CyBORD: Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone and VD: Valcade and Dexamethasone Disclosures: Jimenez-Zepeda: J & J: Honoraria. Reece:Bristol, Meyers, Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson&Johnson: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document