scholarly journals Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Thalidomide and Melphalan (VDT-Mel) Preparative Regimen in Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Results in a Very High Stringent CR (sCR) Rate in Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1971-1971
Author(s):  
Kalyan Nadiminti ◽  
Kamal Kant Singh Abbi ◽  
Annick Tricot ◽  
Allyson Schultz ◽  
Lindsay Dozeman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Melphalan 200mg/m2 is the standard preparative regimen in MM and addition of other cytotoxic drugs has not been found to result in superior activity. The novel agents have improved outcome in MM significantly, but data on their role in preparative regimens are scarce. The purpose of this study was to understand the toxicity and efficacy of triple therapy with VDT in combination with high-dose melphalan. Methods: An IRB approved retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who received an ASCT with the VDT-Mel during 2012-2014. Mel: 100 mg/m2 was given on days -4 and -1; V: 1 mg/m2 on days -4, -1, +2 and +5; T: 100 mg daily from -5 to +5; and D: 20 mg/day from -4 to -1 and +2 to +5. End points were treatment-related toxicity during the first 100 days and quality of response at 6 months post-transplant; 98 patients had follow-up ≥ 6 months. Patients in sCR were also minimal residual disease negative (MRD-) by 10-color flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-4. Results: 100 patients received 153 transplants; 47 patients underwent single and 53 had tandem transplants (TT); 64 patients received early (≤ 12 months of induction therapy) and 36 salvage transplantation. Median age was 61 y; median followup was 16.2 months. Only 1patient had achieved a sCR and 11 a CR prior to transplantation. Best responses at 6 months were 53% sCR (and MRD-), 24% CR, and 9% VGPR. The sCR rate after single transplant was 47% (overall) and 54% (early transplant) vs 59% and 60% after TT. Grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicities were almost entirely related to infections (38% and 53% in single and TT, respectively); the 100-day mortality rate was 2.6% (4/153), 1.8% for early transplants and 4.5% for salvage transplants. Median time to ANC recovery > 500/µL was 12 days in both early and salvage transplantation. Conclusion: VDT-Mel is well-tolerated and resulted in minimal additional toxicity and a similar mortality rate when compared to historic data of MEL alone. Importantly, the sCR rate with MRD- by flow cytometry at 6 months in our study was very high compared to published reports. The ultimate sCR rate will be higher as at this time an additional 13 patients attained a sCR during further follow up past 6 months for a total of 66% sCR. Since both sCR and MRD- are proven early surrogate markers for progression-free and overall survival, it appears highly likely that this regimen will be superior to Mel alone and should become the new standard for ASCT in myeloma. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3563-3563
Author(s):  
Lynda M. Vrooman ◽  
Kristen E. Stevenson ◽  
Marian Harris ◽  
Donna S. Neuberg ◽  
Stephen E. Sallan ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3563 Background: High levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of 4-weeks of multiagent induction chemotherapy have been shown to be associated with a high risk of subsequent relapse in pediatric patients (pts) with B-ALL. Published reports indicated that pediatric B-ALL pts with high end-induction MRD had event-free survival (EFS) rates < 50% when treated with standard chemotherapy.[Zhou, Blood 2007; Borowitz Blood 2008] Pts with high-risk (HR) cytogenetic abnormalities, such as low hypodiploidy and MLL gene rearrangements (MLL-R) also have a high relapse risk. On DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 05–01, we piloted an intensified regimen for B-ALL pts with high end-induction MRD and/or HR cytogenetics. Methods: Between 2005–2010, 482 evaluable pts aged 1–18 years with B-ALL were enrolled. Pts were initially classified as standard-risk (SR) or high-risk (HR) based on NCI age/WBC criteria. MRD was prospectively evaluated at the end of the 4-week induction phase via RQ-PCR analysis of IgH or TCR rearrangements. Results were reported as the ratio of copy numbers of target gene:GAPDH; a ratio >0.001 was considered high MRD. Pts with high MRD or HR cytogenetics (hypodiploidy with <45 chromosomes or MLL-R) were reclassified at the end of induction phase as very high risk (VHR), and received 2 additional chemotherapy cycles beginning at week 7 (cycle 1: cyclophosphamide, low-dose cytarabine, 6-MP; cycle 2: high-dose cytarabine, etoposide, dexamethasone, L-asparaginase), followed by the DFCI ALL Consortium HR consolidation phase, including 30 weeks of L-asparaginase and doxorubicin to a cumulative dose of 300 mg/m2. After consolidation, pts received a standard maintenance phase. Total duration of treatment was 25 months. Results: 51 pts (11%) were classified as VHR, 25 of whom had been initially classified as SR and 26 as HR. 35 VHR pts had high end-induction MRD as the sole VHR criterion; 16 had HR cytogenetics. 9 pts relapsed (all marrow-involved) and 1 pt developed a secondary AML. There were no deaths in first remission. With median follow-up of 4.4 yrs, the 5-yr EFS (95% confidence interval) for all 51 VHR pts was 76% (60,87)[Figure 1] and 5-yr overall survival was 81% (60,92). The 5-yr EFS was 81% (59,90) for the 35 pts with high MRD. Conclusion: Intensification of chemotherapy (without stem cell transplant) resulted in a relatively favorable EFS in VHR B-ALL pts (defined by the presence of either high end-induction MRD or HR cytogenetics). More pts and longer follow-up will be necessary to confirm these promising results. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2037-2037
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
S. Land ◽  
L. Pietragallo ◽  
A. Laman ◽  
M. Sulecki ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Standard FCR therapy in untreated CLL patients (F-25 mg/m2 d1–3 q 4wk; C-250 mg/m2 d 1–3 q 4wk; R-500 mg/m2 d1 q 4wk for 6 cycles) was reported to have complete remissions (CR) of 70% and overall responses (OR) of 95% (J Clin Oncol2005;23:4079). The major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia during 52% of treatment courses. One approach to decrease neutropenia without compromising efficacy could be by reducing the doses of F and C and increasing the dose of R. Methods We conducted a phase II study for previously untreated advanced CLL patients treated with FCR-Lite (F-20mg/m2 d1–3 q 4 wk; C-150 mg/m2 d1–3 q 4 wk; R-500mg/m2 d1 and d14 q 4wks; maintenance R-500 mg/m2 ×1 q 3 months until progression). A Simon two-stage design was used where 15 patients were accrued in the first stage and because of acceptable toxicity and response rate in stage I an additional 35 patients were treated. The primary endpoint was response rate. Results A total of 50 patients were entered into this study and 42 are currently evaluable. There were 29 male and 13 female patients with an age range of 36–85 years (median 58) treated with a total of 236 courses of FCR-Lite. All 42 patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred during 29 (12%) courses with two episodes of neutropenic fever. One patient had cellulitis, another had pneumonia (not neutropenic). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred during 7 (3%) courses and grade III/IV anemia during 6 (2.5%) courses. Among the 40 evaluable patients for response, the CR rate was 85%, PR rate was 15% with an OR rate of 100%. All of the CR patients were tested by flow cytometry and had &lt;1% CD5+/CD19+ cells in their bone marrow after therapy. One patient with potential CR was excluded due to the absence of follow up bone marrow biopsy. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was tested by four color flow cytometry (sensitivity 0.01%) in 8 patients with CR (Genzyme Genetics Corp.). Seven had no evidence of MRD at 7, 8, 8, 14, 22, 25 and 30 months respectively, post CR, and one patient had 0.03% and 0.06% when tested at 12 and 18 months post CR respectively. Conclusions Our results in 42 patients suggest FCR-Lite is highly effective with considerably less grade 3/4 neutropenia than standard FCR. Complete responders had no detectable CD5+/CD19+ cells in their bone marrow following FCR-Lite. MRD testing is currently underway for all patients.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1038-1038
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1038 Poster Board I-60 Background: Outcome of patients (pts) with AML refractory to initial induction is assumed to be poor but the available data is limited. Furthermore, pts refractory to standard dose cytarabine-based regimens may be salvaged with high dose ara-C (HiDaC, defined as daily ara-C dose ≥ 1 g/m2). Information on the outcome of pts refractory to initial HiDaC - based induction is more limited. Aim To better characterize predictors of poor response to HiDaC-based induction and to evaluate the outcome of pts refractory to such induction regimens. Methods: We identified pts treated with induction regimens containing HiDaC at the University of Texas – M D Anderson Cancer Center who did not achieve a compete remission (CR) after one cycle of induction. We examined their pre-treatment characteristics and compared them with similar pts achieving a CR. We also examined their response to salvage chemotherapy and outcome. Results: Among 1179 pts treated with HiDaC-based induction therapy from 1995 to 2009, 285 were primary refractory to one course of induction. Their median age was 59 (range, 18 - 85). Median pretreatment WBC was 9.0 × 109/L (range, 0.3 – 394 × 109/L). Cytogenetics included-5/-7/complex 101 (35%), diploid 85 (30%), other intermediate 98 (34%), favorable 1 (<1%). 165 (58%) pts had antecedent hematological disorder. Induction regimens used included HiDaC with anthracyclines (n=181, 64%), HiDaC with non-anthracycline chemotherapy (fludarabine, clofarabine, topotecan, and troxacitabine) (n=104, 36%) Pts with primary refractory disease were older (Median age 59 vs. 56; p=000004), more likely to have chromosome 5/7 or complex cytogenetic abnormalities (P=0.0001), more likely to have AHD (p=0.0001), and had a higher presentation WBC (P=0.036), but not a higher incidence of FLT3 mutations (p=0.85) than those achieving CR. Primary refractory disease was not more likely with non-anthracycline containing regimens than those with anthracyclines (p=0.58). Salvage chemotherapy included combination chemotherapy in 111 (39%)(non-ara-C regimen in 40, containing ara-C in 71), single agent chemotherapy in 64 (22%), allogeneic stem cell transplant in 22 (8%) and none in 88 (31%). Forty-three (15%) pts responded to salvage including 35 CR and 8 CRp. 114 (58%) pts were resistant and 35 (18%) died; 5 (3%) were lost to follow-up. With a median follow-up of 115 weeks (range 8 – 347 weeks) in pts responding to salvage, 21 pts (7%) were alive and in CR, for at least 6 months including 14 who underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant (median overall survival for these 21 pts, 30 months; range, 13 to 87 months). Conclusions: Outcome of pts with disease refractory to HiDaC-based induction is poor. Alternative strategies are needed in these pts who are likely to be resistant to standard chemotherapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 352-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth J Morgan ◽  
Faith E Davies ◽  
Walter M Gregory ◽  
Susan E Bell ◽  
Alex J Szubert ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 352 We present updated results from MRC Myeloma IX study evaluating the role of the addition of thalidomide to the induction and maintenance of patients with myeloma. The study ran from May 2003 – November 2007 and randomised 1,970 patients and now has a median follow up of more than 3.5 years giving it improved power to detect changes in outcome developing later after treatment. Projected median OS younger fitter patients 66 months, median OS older less fit patients 32 months. The trial comprised of 2 patient pathways, one for younger fitter patients comparing CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone) with CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone), all patients going on to receive an ASCT – median age 59 years. In older less fit patients, melphalan and prednisolone (MP) was compared to CTD attenuated – median age 73 years. In both pathways following initial treatment, eligible patients were randomised to low-dose thalidomide or no maintenance. Patient's response was monitored using electrophoresis, serum free light chain and multiparameter flow cytometry. Cytogenetics was availabel on up to 60% of cases and gene expression on a subset of these. CTD is a well tolerated regimen with a good safety profile giving excellent survivals in both groups of patients despite a small increase in risk of VTE. Using modified EBMT criteria, the addition of thalidomide to induction treatment increases both response rates and depth of response for all age groups. Preliminary results as follows: overall response: CTD vs CVAD: 91% v 82%; CR 21% v 14% and 100 days post-HDM, better responses were seen in CTD with CR rates 65% v 48%. Remission depth was also greater in CTD with more patients achieving minimal residual disease negativity by flow cytometry. The addition of thalidomide increases response rates overall, and particularly complete response (CR) rates (a 17% increase in CR rates post HDM, p=.006). In older/less fit patients CTDa vs MP: overall response 83% v 46%; CR 21% v 4%. Definitive results of these analyses will be presented as well as how they translate into PFS and OS and by cytogenetic subgroup. There is a substantial increase in response with the inclusion of thalidomide but at a median follow-up of three years we are not as yet seeing a substantial increase in survival in either of the two broad patient groups. We have collected data on treatment at relapse to explore how this confounds OS data. Importantly modelling analyses indicate when and to what extent, with further follow-up, the survival differences that should accrue from this increase in CR rate are likely to translate into a survival benefit. These results have a number of important implications. We show the benefit of the addition of thalidomide to myeloma treatment but also highlight the importance of later analysis of such trials because of the emergence of significant changes at these later time points. We will present full updated results from the study including the impact of thalidomide on cytogenetic subgroups and in the maintenance setting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3416-3416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy C Rawstron ◽  
Walter Gregory ◽  
Ruth M de Tute ◽  
Faith E Davies ◽  
Susan E Bell ◽  
...  

Abstract Minimal residual disease (MRD), as assessed by flow cytometry is a powerful predictor of outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). We and others have previously demonstrated that such analyses are informative in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and non-transplant regimens. It predicts outcome in patients in conventional CR and is applicable to patients with standard and adverse risk cytogenetics. As a consequence MRD assessment is under consideration as a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials. This is urgently needed in MM as >5yrs follow-up is typically required to demonstrate survival differences in trials of upfront therapy. If surrogate end points are to be used in clinical trials it is essential that a reproducible effect is demonstrable using multivariate models. Previous studies have confirmed the effect of MRD on PFS but a consistent effect on OS has been not been definitively shown. This may in part be due to the availability of effective salvage therapy but it is also possible that the traditional threshold of 10-4 for analysis and the categorization of patients as MRD-postive or negative is suboptimal. Flow cytometry does provide a quantitative assessment of residual tumour over a large range and the degree of tumour depletion may be more informative than a positive-negative analysis. 397 patients from the MRC Myeloma IX trial were included in this analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) or CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) induction for 4-6 cycles followed by standard high-dose melphalan (HDM) ASCT. BM aspirates were obtained at day 100 for MRD analysis. 500,000 cells were evaluated with six-colour antibody combinations including CD138/CD38/CD45/CD19 with CD56/CD27 in all cases and CD81/CD117 in additional cases as required. PFS and OS data analysis was landmarked from the date of the MRD assesment. Of the 397 patients with MRD data available at day 100 after ASCT, 247/397 (62.2%) achieved <0.01% MRD. The level of residual disease varied across four logs in MRD-positive patients (0.01-<0.1% in 49/397, 0.1-<1% in 72/397, 1-<10% in 26/397 and ≥10% in 3/397). The PFS and OS for individuals with ≥1% residual disease was comparable to individuals with a PR/MR/SD confirming that MRD assessment is most relevant in CR. The level of MRD correlated with outcome. The median PFS for patients with ≥10% MRD at day 100 after ASCT was 0.8 years, with 1-<10% MRD was 1.7 years, with 0.1-<1% MRD was 1.9 years, with 0.01-<0.1% MRD was 2.7 years and for patients with <0.01% MRD was 3.1 years (P<0.001). The median OS for these groups was 1 yr, 4 yrs, 5.9 yrs, 6.8 yrs and for patients with <0.01% MRD not reached with >7.5 yrs median follow-up (P<0.001, see figure). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to further evaluate factors influencing outcome. B2M and MRD were log-transformed and along with age were considered as continuous variables. ISS, haemoglobin (<115g/l), platelets (<150x10^9/l) and cytogenetics were used as stratification factors. Cytogenetic groups were classified as unfavourable for patients with gain(1q), del(1p32), t(4;14), t(14;20), t(14;16), and del(17p), or favourable for hyperdiploidy, t(11;14) and t(6;14), or unknown/inevaluable. MRD assessment (χ2 11.8, P=0.0006) and cytogenetics (χ2 35.5, P=<0.0001) were the only factors that retained significance in this multivariate model. Conventional categorical response, ISS and B2M were not predictive of OS (p=0.99, 0.16 and 0.56 respectively). We would conclude that MRD quantitation is more informative than a positive or negative categorization with a 10-4 threshold and independently predicts outcome. In this analysis we were able to demonstrate an approximate 1 year survival benefit per log tumour depletion. A lower cutpoint for predicting improved outcome was not reached and more sensitive assays will likely improve outcome prediction further. This data strongly supports the role of MRD assessment as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rawstron: Celgene: Consultancy; BD Biosciences: Consultancy, Intrasure Patents & Royalties. Gregory:Celgene: Consultancy. Davies:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Cook:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jackson:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Morgan:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Owen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3902-3902
Author(s):  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Charles Asa Koller ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3902 Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) is highly effective treatment and standard of care for patients (pts) with CLL. Response to treatment by NCI-WG/IWCLL criteria correlates with outcome; pts who achieve complete remission (CR) have superior progression-free and overall survival compared to pts who achieve partial remission (PR); and pts who fail therapy have the poorest outcome. Emerging data indicate improved outcomes for pts who achieve minimal residual disease (MRD)-free status in blood or bone marrow (BM) by end of treatment. We are conducting a clinical trial to prospectively evaluate pretreatment pt characteristics and prognostic factors and correlations with NCI-WG response, MRD-free status, and time to event outcomes with standard frontline fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) CIT. A total of 197 pts have been registered, 160 have completed treatment and are evaluable for response by NCI-WG criteria, and 127 have BM MRD status evaluated by standard 4-color flow cytometry at Course 3 and/or end of treatment. We report on pretreatment characteristics associated with MRD-free status at end of treatment. For the 160 pts evaluable for response by NCI-WG criteria, 63% were male; the median (range) age, β2M, and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) were 58 yrs (38–84), 3.6 mg/l (1.3–14.1), and 78.7 K/μl (.8–394), respectively. The percent pts with Rai high-risk disease, unmutated IGHV status, ZAP70+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and CD38+ (30% cutoff) was 35%, 60%, 63%, and 37%, respectively. According to the hierarchical categorization, FISH demonstrated 17p del in 9%, 11q del in 18%, +12 in 17%, 13q del in 36%, and no abnormality in 20% of pts. The median number of FCR courses given was 6; 57% received all intended 6, 21% received 4–5, and 23% received ≤3. Of the 160 pts, 63% achieved CR, 12% nodular PR (nPR), 23% PR and 3% did not respond. Of 127 pts with BM evaluated by 4-color flow cytometry at end of treatment, 56% were MRD-free. Of 71 MRD-free pts, 27 were negative at end of course 3, 33 converted to negative after course 3, and 11 were negative at end of treatment but did not have a course 3 evaluation. Univariable Chi-square analyses demonstrated pretreatment β2M, IGHV mutation status, 17p del, and +12 correlated with MRD-free status at end of treatment (Table). The following did not correlate: age, Rai stage, WBC, ALC, HGB, PLT, ZAP70, CD38, or number of FCR courses received. Multivariable logistic regression model identified β2M≥4 mg/l (odds ratio=.78; p=.007) and unmutated IGHV (odds ratio=.77; p=.006) as independently associated with lower likelihood to achieve MRD-free status. In conclusion, mutated IGHV and β2M <4 mg/l are independently associated with increased likelihood of achieving MRD-free status with frontline FCR CIT; further follow up is needed to correlate MRD-free status with improved survival outcomes for patients treated on this trial.TableNCI-WG Responsen% MRD-NegativeCR8071nPR150PR3047*NR20Pretreatment Characteristicn% MRD-Negativep-valueAge (yrs) <65100600.07≥652741Rai Stage Low & Int-risk82610.12High-risk4347b2M (mg/l) <473640.02≥44942ALC (K/ml) <5040560.86≥508755IGHV Mutated47700.006Unmutated6244ZAP70 IHC Negative41610.28Positive7351CD38+ ≤7%4863Ref**8–29%27480.23≥30%42550.46FISH 13q del4556RefNone22680.32+1220800.0611q del20400.2417p del10200.04*All MRD-free are PR due to cytopenia, with no evidence of CLL**Used as reference or comparison group Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1414-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Mejstrikova ◽  
Julie Irving ◽  
Leonid Karawajew ◽  
Marian Case ◽  
Jenny Jesson ◽  
...  

Abstract At acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) relapse, about 40% of children can be salvaged with intensified multi-agent, high dose chemotherapy and in very high risk patients, with additional stem cell transplantation (SCT). To improve on this, the International BFM Study Group has led a consortium of 19 countries to develop the world's largest trial for relapsed ALL (IntReALL). Standard risk patients will be randomized to receive the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 or UK ALL R3 therapy and post induction will be randomised to receive the additional targeted anti-CD22 drug, Epratuzumab, during consolidation, to clear residual disease. Children with end of re-induction MRD positive bone marrow will undergo SCT following consolidation. Both ALL-REZ BFM 2002 and UK ALL R3 used MRD PCR-based quantification of clonal Ig/TCR rearrangements, with different cut offs (10-3 for ALL-REZ BFM 2002 and 10-4 for UK ALL R3) and this is the reference assay for IntReALL. However, flow MRD may also play a role for patients without PCR targets. Flow MRD relies on the discrimination of leukaemic blasts from hematogones and this can be hampered depending on the degree of haematopoietic regeneration which varies depending on the treatment protocol and is especially important after intensive induction treatment in relapsed protocols. Thus, prospective MRD quantification of patients entered onto the UKALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trials was performed by a standardised, quality assured, 4-8colour Flow MRD assay in end of re-induction bone marrow aspirates, by laboratories in the IBFM FLOW consortium (n=221). Flow MRD in both treatment protocols was classed as a prospective biological add on study and not used for clinical decision making. Median MRD levels were 0.026 +/-9.9% SD for BFM versus 0.027+/-18% SD for UK protocols, with comparative MRD positivity rates of 45% versus 54%, respectively. Comparison with MRD levels as assessed by molecular analysis of antigen receptor gene rearrangements was performed in 170 samples (BFM,128; UK R3, 42). The Spearman rank correlation of all samples was 0.90 (p<0.0001) for patients treated on the BFM protocol, compared to 0.82 (p<0.0001) for those on UK ALL R3. Risk category concordance was 88% (ALL-REZ BFM) and 88% (UKALLR3). For the 21 discordant samples, 5 were MRD positive by flow but negative by PCR and 17 were negative by flow and positive by PCR. When analysing the accuracy, with which flow MRD classified specimens identically as PCR, the sensitivity of flow MRD in the ALL-REZ BFM protocol was 81% (cut off 0.1%) and in UK ALL R3 was 79% (cut off 0.01%). Specificity values were 93% versus 100%, respectively. Although sample processing and quantification of MRD differ between PCR and FC MRD, in both re-induction protocols, there was good correlation of MRD levels assessed by flow cytometry and PCR, validating the use of Flow MRD as a method of choice in patients without PCR targets in the IntReALL trial. Flow MRD also has the advantage of enabling levels of CD22 to be assayed on MRD cells, prior to treatment with Epratuzumab. This research has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 278514 - IntReALL", Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung for its funding support of the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trial and the minimal residual disease studies by PCR and the Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukämiestiftung for support of the international principal investigator, Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research and North East Children's Cancer Research Fund, NT 13462-4, NV15-28525A, NV15-26588A, UNCE 204012. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4104-4104
Author(s):  
Gregorio Campos-Cabrera ◽  
Virgina Campos-Cabrera ◽  
Jose-Luis Campos-Villagomez

Abstract Abstract 4104 Background acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children and adolescences, improvements in the 5 year survival rate continue to be seen since middle 80's, in the 1996 – 2004 SEER data reaching 84 % for children and young adults less than 19 years of age. In Mexico, a developing country, where the minimum salary is less than 3.5 dollars per day and more than a half of the population earn less than that and had no social security the need for an effective with high rate survival but low cost treatment is a priority. We developed a treatment based in the protocol ALL:SWOG9400; Blood 92(10)(Suppl.1): 676a (#2788) (1998) and Blood 100(11):756a (#2991) (2002) and weekly anthracycline induction intensification: protocol ALL-BMF90; Blood 84:3122-3133 (1994) and Blood 95:3310-3322 (2000); and named the LAFAMI-LLA-2002. Methods patients younger than 18 years old with ALL by bone marrow aspirate (BMA), flow cytometry and kariotype analysis; risk-based treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, (Ching-Hon Pui en J Clin Oncol 1996;14:18-24 and N Engl J Med 1998;339:605-615). Treatment with LAFAMI-LLA-2002 protocol consist in induction phase (IP) con prednisone 60 mg/m2/d for 28 days and taper to zero betwen day 29 and day 42; doxorubicine 30 mg/m2 days 1,8,15 y 22; vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg) days 1,8,15,22,29 y 35; L-asparaginase 10,000u/m2 days 33 al 42; allopurinol 300 mg/m2 days 1 to 14; patients with high risk also receive ciclofosfamide 750 mg/m2 days 1,15 y 29; after complete IP a BMA is taken and if it is in complete remission then start CNS directed therapy with intratecal chemotherapy (IT CT) twice a week for 4 weeks, triple drug without folinic acid rescue: methotrexate 15/m2 mg, citarabine 40/m2 mg and dexametasone 8 mg; patients with positive CNS involvement and high risk patients also receive cranial irradiation (RT) 2400 cGy; maintenance initiating after IR and during IT CT with mercaptopurine 60 mg/m2/d y metotrexate 20 mg/m2 weekly during 3 years and bi monthly chemotherapy alternating one month IT CT and another month IV CT: dexametasone 40 mg/m2 days 1 to 4, ciclofosfamide 750 mg/m2 day 1, vincristine as mentioned above and citarabine 75 mg/m2 days 3 to 6 y 10 to 13; every 4 months an extra dose of doxorubicine is given with th IV CT. At the end of the treatment flow cytometry for minimal residual disease is taken and if negative go to follow up, then monthly CBC and every six months MRD by FC to complete 5 years. Echocardiograms were performed before IP and every six months until complete the end of the 5 years. Results from January 2002 to July 2009 13 patients were included, 8 male y 5 female, ages from 2 to 17 years; 12 B lineage an 1 T lineage; all with normal kariotype; 10 low risk and 3 high risk; 8 patients completed treatment and are in follow up, 4 patients are in maintenance phase, and one died from relapse during maintenance. All patients completed IP and CNS directed therapy, CR was demonstrated in all and each one. All 8 that completed treatment are in follow up and are negative in MRD, the minimum follow up is 13 months and the maximum is 35; 5 patients from this group have more than 24 months without treatment. No cardiac toxicity was seen; all had normal echocardiogram at the end and every six months after the end of treatment. Conclusions this is an efficient treatment for ALL in patients younger than 18 years, reaching until now 100% of CR in IR and CNS directed therapy; with 92.3 % of global and free event survival: similar results than in protocols using high dose cytarabine and methrotexate but without the toxicity of them; reducing financial costs and hospital admissions because it is an ambulatory treatment that can be given in almost all cities, even in developing countries. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2012-2012
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Wendi A. Bacon ◽  
Phuong Doan ◽  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
Mitchell E. Horwitz ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2012 High dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a valid treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). HDC has improved response rate, event-free survival (EFS) and treatment free interval for patients with MM when compared with conventional chemotherapy. To date, Melphalan 200 mg/m2 (HDM) remains the standard ASCT preparative regimen as no other regimens have demonstrated improved outcomes with acceptable toxicity. Nevertheless, relapse remains inevitable with this approach prompting continued search for better therapies. To overcome resistance and early relapse we used a more aggressive alkylator based conditioning regimen. Here we summarize a retrospective study of the long-term follow-up of newly diagnosed MM patients treated with the preparative regimen Carmustine, 500 mg/m2 and Melphalan, 200 mg/m2 (BCNU/HDM) followed by ASCT versus a subsequent group of patients treated with HDM alone and ASCT. Methods: Between November of 1997 and December of 2008, 207 patients with MM underwent HDC followed by ASCT at our Institution, using either BCNU/HDM (n = 104, treated between 1997–2002) or HDM (n = 103, treated between 2002–2008) as the preparative regimen. Presenting patient characteristics were similar (age, gender, MM type, hemoglobin, creatinine, calcium, plasma cell infiltration, Durie-Salmon stage, and ISS stage). Patients treated with BCNU/HDM were diagnosed preceding the introduction of novel anti-MM agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib and thus did not receive these as induction therapy, while HDM patients received various combinations of novel agents as induction therapy. Results: With a median follow-up for surviving patients of 96 and 34 months for the BCNU/HDM and HDM cohorts, respectively, the event-free survival (EFS) was significantly increased with the BCNU/HDM conditioning regimen (41.7 months) as compared with the HDM regimen (21.6 months, p = 0.013) (Figure 1). Median overall survival (OS) was 83.1 months with BCNU/HDM vs. 68.2 months with HDM (p = 0.359 at current follow-up) with 34% of BCNU/HDM patients alive at >10 years (Figure 2). In the BCNU/HDM group, 47/104 patients achieved ≥VGPR and this subgroup had a median OS of 103 months. Nineteen patients in the BCNU/HDM group are ≥7 years from ASCT and 18 (17%) have never required treatment for progressive disease. Engraftment and transplant-related mortality were similar in both groups (3% TRM in the BCNU/HDM and 4% TRM in the HDM arm). The BCNU/HDM group had a higher incidence of pneumonitis (50%) vs. the HDM group (15%) but this was managed with short courses of steroids and was never fatal. Focusing on the subgroup of patients who proceeded to transplant immediately after only 1 induction course, the median OS was 103 months for the BCNU (80 patients) containing arm versus 69 months for the HDM (71 patients) arm (p=0.085), suggesting a clear trend further favoring this dose dense approach. Conclusions: EFS was superior with the BCNU/HDM regimen compared with HDM and a subgroup of patients treated with BCNU/HDM have achieved EFS >7 years without any additional therapy. Engraftment and treatment related mortality were similar in both groups despite advances in supportive care for the HDM group. Our findings suggest that BCNU/HDM should be compared in a randomized prospective fashion to HDM as an ASCT preparative regimen following optimal induction therapy with novel agents to determine whether this will lead to further improvements in EFS and OS following ASCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document