scholarly journals Validation of MRD Quantification By Flow Cytometry for Pediatric BCP ALL Relapsed Patients Treated on the Intreall Protocol

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1414-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Mejstrikova ◽  
Julie Irving ◽  
Leonid Karawajew ◽  
Marian Case ◽  
Jenny Jesson ◽  
...  

Abstract At acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) relapse, about 40% of children can be salvaged with intensified multi-agent, high dose chemotherapy and in very high risk patients, with additional stem cell transplantation (SCT). To improve on this, the International BFM Study Group has led a consortium of 19 countries to develop the world's largest trial for relapsed ALL (IntReALL). Standard risk patients will be randomized to receive the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 or UK ALL R3 therapy and post induction will be randomised to receive the additional targeted anti-CD22 drug, Epratuzumab, during consolidation, to clear residual disease. Children with end of re-induction MRD positive bone marrow will undergo SCT following consolidation. Both ALL-REZ BFM 2002 and UK ALL R3 used MRD PCR-based quantification of clonal Ig/TCR rearrangements, with different cut offs (10-3 for ALL-REZ BFM 2002 and 10-4 for UK ALL R3) and this is the reference assay for IntReALL. However, flow MRD may also play a role for patients without PCR targets. Flow MRD relies on the discrimination of leukaemic blasts from hematogones and this can be hampered depending on the degree of haematopoietic regeneration which varies depending on the treatment protocol and is especially important after intensive induction treatment in relapsed protocols. Thus, prospective MRD quantification of patients entered onto the UKALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trials was performed by a standardised, quality assured, 4-8colour Flow MRD assay in end of re-induction bone marrow aspirates, by laboratories in the IBFM FLOW consortium (n=221). Flow MRD in both treatment protocols was classed as a prospective biological add on study and not used for clinical decision making. Median MRD levels were 0.026 +/-9.9% SD for BFM versus 0.027+/-18% SD for UK protocols, with comparative MRD positivity rates of 45% versus 54%, respectively. Comparison with MRD levels as assessed by molecular analysis of antigen receptor gene rearrangements was performed in 170 samples (BFM,128; UK R3, 42). The Spearman rank correlation of all samples was 0.90 (p<0.0001) for patients treated on the BFM protocol, compared to 0.82 (p<0.0001) for those on UK ALL R3. Risk category concordance was 88% (ALL-REZ BFM) and 88% (UKALLR3). For the 21 discordant samples, 5 were MRD positive by flow but negative by PCR and 17 were negative by flow and positive by PCR. When analysing the accuracy, with which flow MRD classified specimens identically as PCR, the sensitivity of flow MRD in the ALL-REZ BFM protocol was 81% (cut off 0.1%) and in UK ALL R3 was 79% (cut off 0.01%). Specificity values were 93% versus 100%, respectively. Although sample processing and quantification of MRD differ between PCR and FC MRD, in both re-induction protocols, there was good correlation of MRD levels assessed by flow cytometry and PCR, validating the use of Flow MRD as a method of choice in patients without PCR targets in the IntReALL trial. Flow MRD also has the advantage of enabling levels of CD22 to be assayed on MRD cells, prior to treatment with Epratuzumab. This research has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 278514 - IntReALL", Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung for its funding support of the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trial and the minimal residual disease studies by PCR and the Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukämiestiftung for support of the international principal investigator, Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research and North East Children's Cancer Research Fund, NT 13462-4, NV15-28525A, NV15-26588A, UNCE 204012. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 322-322
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽  
Paola Ballerini ◽  
Marina Romeo ◽  
Vahid Asnafi ◽  
Marie-Francoise Auclerc ◽  
...  

Abstract TEL-AML1 fusion transcripts are found in 25% of children with B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL). From June 1993 to December 1999, 1195 children with BCP-ALL were included in the FRALLE 93 protocol. Out of these, 792 were evaluated for TEL-AML1 transcript expression. There is no difference in terms of initial features, DFS, EFS, survival between evaluated (792) and non evaluated (403) patients. Out of the 792 pts, 191 (24%) expressed TEL-AML1 transcripts at diagnosis. To assess the potential prognostic value of TEL-AML1 transcripts quantification, we have retrospectively analysed follow up marrow samples using Europe Against Cancer procedures for real time quantitative RT-PCR assay, on ABI PRISM 7700 (2 reference labs) and Light Cycler apparatus (1 reference lab). Out of the 191 TEL-AML1+ve pts, 83 were evaluated for MRD at different time points after induction therapy (median = D41 (34–55) (53 evaluable pts), at D111 (62–158) (62 pts), at D216 (159–325) (33 pts) and at D838 (365–1287) (49 pts). According to normalized Ct values, samples were attributed to 4 MRD level ranging from 0 to 3 and defined as follows: 0: Ct>40 ; 1 : 36<Ct≤40 ; 2 : 33<Ct≤36 ; 3 : Ct≤33, corresponding respectively to undetectable MRD ; MRD<10-4 ; 10-4≤MRD<10-3 ; MRD≥ 10-3, with respect to dilution of REH cDNA. Distribution of pts according to MRD level at different time points after induction treatment are summarized in the following table. Seventeen relapses have occurred at a median time of 41 months (17–73)(bone marrow: 7, BM + other: 5, testis: 3, CNS: 2). A level 2 positivity at the end of induction was associated with an increased risk of relapse of 3.31(95%CI:1.02 – 10.76, p =.047) while level 3 positivity was associated with a relative risk of 9.52 (95%CI: 2.91 – 31.08, p =.0002). Positivity at D111 was associated with an increased risk of relapse of 8.6 (2.0 – 38.5, p = 0.0042), whatever the level. Combination of data obtained at D41 and D111 allows to distinguish 3 subsets of pts with decreasing relapse-free survival: from 97.5% (95%CI: 85–100%) in pts with no positivity at D111 whatever the D41 result, to 75% (95%CI: 58–92%) in pts with MRD +ve at D111 with low level at D41 and 42% (95%CI: 14–69%) in pts with MRD +ve at D111 with level 2 or 3 at D41 (p<.0001). No other prognostic factor was found (age, sex, WBC, D8 steroid response, D21 bone marrow response) which renders the MRD profile unique in this matter. Conclusion: RQ-PCR-based MRD detection is a powerful prognostic tool in TEL-AML1+ve leukemia. Combination of two time points allows a relevant stratification of pts according to the risk of relapse, compatible with clinical decision making towards intensification or deescalation in the setting of controlled trials FU time point Number of pts in MRD classes (number of relapses) 0 1 2 3 Not evaluated D41 27 (3) 11 (2) 10 (4) 5 (4) 30 (4) D111 40 (2) 14 (6) 7 (2) 1 (1) 21 (6) D216 29 (2) 2 (1) 1 (0) 1 (1) 50 (13) D838 47 (8) 1 (0) 1 (1) 0 34 (8)


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5287-5287
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Cervantes ◽  
Daniel J Enriquez ◽  
Judith Vidal ◽  
Rosario Retamozo

Abstract Background: Prognostic factors in B-ALL represent a critical role for treatment stratification. High hyperdiploids (>50 chromosomes) have been related to better outcomes, and hypodiploids to worse prognosis. DNA Index (DI) quantifies the DNA from leukemic blast by flow cytometry and has been correlated to the number of chromosomes. Our aim was to demonstrate the prognostic value of DI for minimal residual disease in childhood B-ALL. Methods: 26 blood samples from newly diagnosed childhood B-ALL cases were analyzed between November 2017 and February 2018. DI was evaluated by flow cytometry in samples with Propidium Iodide and leukemic blasts were identified by CD19/CD22/CD10/CD20 antibodies. DI was calculated as the ratio of mean fluorescence of pathologic B blasts and normal cells (T, NK lymphocytes, neutrophils and monocytes) in G0/G1 phase. We stablished three categories: diploid (0.95 - 1.05, 46 chromosomes), hypodiploid (<0.95) and hyperdiploid (>1.05). 8-colors FacsCanto II BD flow cytometer was also used to evaluate minimal residual disease with 0.0025% threshold of detection. Results: 26 cases were evaluated and 2 died during induction treatment. Median age was 8 years (4mo - 16years) and 54% were males. At diagnosis, 62% showed DI diploid and 38% DI hyperdiploid, no hypodiploids cases were detected. Clinical characteristics were similar between both groups. Median DI in the hyperdiploids cases was 1.25 (R: 1.12 - 1.64). We only detected two hyperdiploids cases by conventional karyotype. All patients received the same BFM-based protocol. After induction, all cases achieved complete remission and 46% had MRD negative at the 28th day. DI diploid and hyperdiploid cases achieved 47% and 44% MRD negative, respectively. At the end of consolidation (R: 6-8 Mo), 77% cases achieved MRD negative, and between categories, 62% of DI diploid cases had MRD negative and 100% of DI hyperdiploid cases were negative for MRD detection by flow (p=0.02). Conclusions: The hyperdiploid DNA index by flow cytometry is associated with minimal residual disease negative at the end of consolidation.Flow cytometry offers an alternative over the conventional karyotype to detect good prognosis groups among B-ALL cases. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
Sarah Farag ◽  
Ulrike Bacher ◽  
Myriam Legros ◽  
Daniel Betticher ◽  
Jean-Marc Lüthi ◽  
...  

Introduction: Consolidation of first-line induction treatment in myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with 200 mg/m2 melphalan chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was established as standard of care three decades ago. However, definite cure in myeloma patients remains exceptional due to residual disease escaping intensive treatment, and almost all patients will ultimately relapse at earlier or later time points following ASCT. Thus, improving efficacy of HDCT in MM remains an unresolved issue. Methods: We performed a phase-II randomized trial comparing standard 200 mg/m2 Melphalan (Mel) HDCT to experimental HDCT treatment with 200 mg/m2 bendamustine, a bifunctional alkylating agent, given at days -4 and -3, combined with 200 mg/m2 melphalan split on days -2 and -1 at 100 mg/m2 (BenMel) before ASCT in MM pts. Patients had up to four cycles of first-line induction treatment with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. After ASCT, pts received lenalidomide maintenance treatment for two years. The primary endpoint was to show a 15% improvement of the rate of complete remission (sCR+CR) after HDCT with BenMel compared to Mel alone. MRD assessment from the bone marrow was performed by multiparameter flow cytometry after hematological engraftment following HDCT/ASCT. MRD negativity was defined as clonal plasma cells below 10(-5). Results: We randomized 120 myeloma pts (60 patients in each arm), with high-risk genetic abnormalities present in 21.3% of the patients. The median age was 63 years (range 35-74). The sCR/CR rate after ASCT before initiation of lenalidomide maintenance treatment was better in the BenMel arm compared to Mel alone (70.0% vs 51.7%; p=.039). The post-ASCT remission rates in detail were sCR 40.0% vs 31.7% (p=.341); CR 30.0% vs 20.0% (p=.205); VGPR 16.7% vs 33.3% (p=.035); and PR 13.3% vs 15.0% (p=.793). MRD negativity assessed in the bone marrow by flow cytometry was observed in 26 (45.6%) of the BenMel treated pts compared to 22 (37.9%) of the Mel pts. Median time until neutrophil engraftment was 11 days after BenMel vs 12 days after Mel (p=.096), and median time until platelet engraftment was 13 days in both arms (p=0.367); all pts had full engraftment of both cell lineages. Prolonged hospitalization duration was seen in BenMel pts (median 19 vs 18 days; p=.006) due to the longer BenMel treatment administration. Fully reversible acute renal insufficiency occurred in three (5%) BenMel pts compared to none of the Mel pts (p=.250). No treatment-related mortality was seen in both groups. ICU admissions were necessary in 3 pts (5%) in the BenMel group (ARDS, septic shock, pulmonary failure), and 2 Mel treated pts (3.3%; due to pulmonary failure and decompensated cardiomyopathy). The PFS rates at 12 months were 95% in BenMel pts and 91% in Mel treated pts (p=.551). OS at 12 months was 96% for both groups (p=.262), and median PFS and OS were not reached in both groups. Conclusions: Our data confirm that high-dose bendamustine combined with melphalan HDCT before ASCT in MM patients is safe and well tolerated. In particular, bendamustine-associated renal toxicity was manageable and reversible in all patients, and hematopoietic engraftment was comparable to standard melphalan HDCT. HDCT with BenMel improves the sCR/CR rate compared to standard melphalan alone. Thus, BenMel HDCT before ASCT warrants further investigation aiming to improve the long-term survival rates of MM patients, eventually combined with new maintenance strategies in the post-transplant period. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2037-2037
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
S. Land ◽  
L. Pietragallo ◽  
A. Laman ◽  
M. Sulecki ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Standard FCR therapy in untreated CLL patients (F-25 mg/m2 d1–3 q 4wk; C-250 mg/m2 d 1–3 q 4wk; R-500 mg/m2 d1 q 4wk for 6 cycles) was reported to have complete remissions (CR) of 70% and overall responses (OR) of 95% (J Clin Oncol2005;23:4079). The major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia during 52% of treatment courses. One approach to decrease neutropenia without compromising efficacy could be by reducing the doses of F and C and increasing the dose of R. Methods We conducted a phase II study for previously untreated advanced CLL patients treated with FCR-Lite (F-20mg/m2 d1–3 q 4 wk; C-150 mg/m2 d1–3 q 4 wk; R-500mg/m2 d1 and d14 q 4wks; maintenance R-500 mg/m2 ×1 q 3 months until progression). A Simon two-stage design was used where 15 patients were accrued in the first stage and because of acceptable toxicity and response rate in stage I an additional 35 patients were treated. The primary endpoint was response rate. Results A total of 50 patients were entered into this study and 42 are currently evaluable. There were 29 male and 13 female patients with an age range of 36–85 years (median 58) treated with a total of 236 courses of FCR-Lite. All 42 patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred during 29 (12%) courses with two episodes of neutropenic fever. One patient had cellulitis, another had pneumonia (not neutropenic). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred during 7 (3%) courses and grade III/IV anemia during 6 (2.5%) courses. Among the 40 evaluable patients for response, the CR rate was 85%, PR rate was 15% with an OR rate of 100%. All of the CR patients were tested by flow cytometry and had &lt;1% CD5+/CD19+ cells in their bone marrow after therapy. One patient with potential CR was excluded due to the absence of follow up bone marrow biopsy. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was tested by four color flow cytometry (sensitivity 0.01%) in 8 patients with CR (Genzyme Genetics Corp.). Seven had no evidence of MRD at 7, 8, 8, 14, 22, 25 and 30 months respectively, post CR, and one patient had 0.03% and 0.06% when tested at 12 and 18 months post CR respectively. Conclusions Our results in 42 patients suggest FCR-Lite is highly effective with considerably less grade 3/4 neutropenia than standard FCR. Complete responders had no detectable CD5+/CD19+ cells in their bone marrow following FCR-Lite. MRD testing is currently underway for all patients.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4102-4102
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Okamoto ◽  
Yoshihisa Nagatoshi ◽  
Akinobu Matsuzaki ◽  
Aiko Suminoe ◽  
Hideki Nakayama ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4102 Background Previously we reported the result of Kyushu-Yamaguchi Children's Cancer Study Group (KYCCSG) protocol, ALL-96, for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (ASH meeting in 2005). The 7-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 72% (95% CI; 68 - 76 %) and 85 % (95% CI; 80 - 90 %), respectively. Following protocol, ALL-02, was aimed to assess the usefulness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) in the same context as ALL-96 protocol. Purpose In this combined analysis, we analyzed the outcome and risk factors for relapse/survival in children with T-ALL who were treated with the ALL-96/ALL-02 protocols. Study Design and Treatment A total of 42 patients (22 of 218 in ALL-96 and 20 of 165 in ALL-02, 26 males and 16 females) with median age of 8 years (range 1 - 14) were treated. Patients were classified into 2 groups, standard risk (SR) and high risk (HR). HR patients had one of the followings: high white blood cell (WBC) counts more than 50,000/μl, T-cell immunophenotype, central nervous system (CNS) disease at diagnosis, organomegaly (hepatomegaly or splenomegaly more than 5 cm below costal margin), M2/3 marrow at day 15 of induction therapy. Both protocols consisted of induction, early intensification, consolidation, late intensification and maintenance therapy. Predonisolone (PSL), weekly vincristine (VCR), 4 doses of daunorubicin (DNR), 8 doses of L-asparaginase (L-asp) and 2 or 4 doses of intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX) depending on the CNS status, were given during induction. In early intensification, DNR, cytarabine (CA), etoposide and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) were given. Consolidation consisted of intermediate dose of MTX, combination of cyclophosphamide(CPM), CA and 6-MP, and high dose CA. Late intensification similar to induction included 2 weeks of dexamethasone (DEX), weekly VCR, 2 doses of pirarubicin, single dose of CPM, 5 doses of L-asp and IT-MTX followed by combination of CA, 6-MP, IT-MTX along with 18 Gy cranial irradiation in 12 fractions. In ALL-96 protocol, patients were randomized to receive maintenance therapy of either combination of 6-MP/MTX and DEX/ VCR pulse (A-arm) or LSA2L2-type therapy (B-arm). In ALL-02 protocol, A-arm was chosen as a maintenance therapy based on result of ALL-96. No patient underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in 1st complete remission (CR). Results Median follow-up periods were 96 and 38 months in ALL-96 and ALL-02, respectively. Two patients were off-protocol before achieving CR because of toxicity and chromosome abnormality with t(4;11). Induction rate in 40 patients was 95%. All 14 events were relapses and TRM rate was 0%. Last event occurred at 40 months. The sites of relapse were isolated BM in 9, isolated testis in 2, isolated CNS in 1 and combined sites in 2. Nine died from disease progression and 2 died from toxicity after SCT in 2nd CR. The 4-year EFS and OS rates in all patients were 55 % (95 % CI; 39 – 71 %) and 71 % (95 % CI; 56 -86 %), respectively. EFS of ALL-96 and ALL-02 were 50 %[95 % CI; 29 -71 %]) and 65 % [95 % CI; 45 - 85 %]), respectively. OS of ALL-96 and ALL-02 were 59 % [95 % CI; 39 – 80 %]) and 90 % [95 % CI; 77 - 103 %]), respectively (p = 0.063). EFS of patients treated in A and B arm were 60 % [95 % CI; 41 -71 %]) and 55 % [95 % CI; 25 - 84 %]), respectively. None of age, sex, organomagaly, WBC, chromosomal abnormalities, CNS status, protocol, and maintenance arm was identified as a risk factor for relapse or survival. Two of 10 (ALL-96) and 3 of 4 (ALL-02) relapsed patients have survived with allogeneic SCT. Conclusion Although T-ALL patients received an intensified treatment including cranial radiation, the outcome was unsatisfactory. One possible explanation for better OS in ALL-02 protocol is that the majority of relapsed patients in ALL-02 were salvaged by SCT in 2nd CR. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 352-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth J Morgan ◽  
Faith E Davies ◽  
Walter M Gregory ◽  
Susan E Bell ◽  
Alex J Szubert ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 352 We present updated results from MRC Myeloma IX study evaluating the role of the addition of thalidomide to the induction and maintenance of patients with myeloma. The study ran from May 2003 – November 2007 and randomised 1,970 patients and now has a median follow up of more than 3.5 years giving it improved power to detect changes in outcome developing later after treatment. Projected median OS younger fitter patients 66 months, median OS older less fit patients 32 months. The trial comprised of 2 patient pathways, one for younger fitter patients comparing CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone) with CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone), all patients going on to receive an ASCT – median age 59 years. In older less fit patients, melphalan and prednisolone (MP) was compared to CTD attenuated – median age 73 years. In both pathways following initial treatment, eligible patients were randomised to low-dose thalidomide or no maintenance. Patient's response was monitored using electrophoresis, serum free light chain and multiparameter flow cytometry. Cytogenetics was availabel on up to 60% of cases and gene expression on a subset of these. CTD is a well tolerated regimen with a good safety profile giving excellent survivals in both groups of patients despite a small increase in risk of VTE. Using modified EBMT criteria, the addition of thalidomide to induction treatment increases both response rates and depth of response for all age groups. Preliminary results as follows: overall response: CTD vs CVAD: 91% v 82%; CR 21% v 14% and 100 days post-HDM, better responses were seen in CTD with CR rates 65% v 48%. Remission depth was also greater in CTD with more patients achieving minimal residual disease negativity by flow cytometry. The addition of thalidomide increases response rates overall, and particularly complete response (CR) rates (a 17% increase in CR rates post HDM, p=.006). In older/less fit patients CTDa vs MP: overall response 83% v 46%; CR 21% v 4%. Definitive results of these analyses will be presented as well as how they translate into PFS and OS and by cytogenetic subgroup. There is a substantial increase in response with the inclusion of thalidomide but at a median follow-up of three years we are not as yet seeing a substantial increase in survival in either of the two broad patient groups. We have collected data on treatment at relapse to explore how this confounds OS data. Importantly modelling analyses indicate when and to what extent, with further follow-up, the survival differences that should accrue from this increase in CR rate are likely to translate into a survival benefit. These results have a number of important implications. We show the benefit of the addition of thalidomide to myeloma treatment but also highlight the importance of later analysis of such trials because of the emergence of significant changes at these later time points. We will present full updated results from the study including the impact of thalidomide on cytogenetic subgroups and in the maintenance setting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 836-836
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 836 The hyper-CVAD regimen is an effective frontline program for de novo adult ALL and LL [Kantarjian, JCO 18:547, 2000; Kantarjian, Cancer 101:2788, 2004, Thomas, Blood 104:1624, 2004]. Intensive chemotherapy with hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine [VCR], doxorubicin, dexamethasone) alternates with high dose methotrexate (MTX) and cytarabine every 21 days for 8 courses, followed by maintenance therapy with POMP (6-mercaptopurine, MTX, VCR, prednisone). Historical CR rate was 92% with 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 38%. The regimen was modified in 1999. Induction chemotherapy was given in a protective environment owing to higher mortality in patients (pts) aged 60 years or older (17% vs 3%). Course 2 of liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine was incorporated owing to reports suggesting benefit of early anthracycline intensification. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 (days 1 & 11 of hyper-CVAD, days 1 & 8 of methotrexate-cytarabine) was given if CD20 expression was 20% or greater due to its association with disease recurrence [Thomas, Blood 113:6330, 2009]. The maintenance phase was extended to 30 months with additional intensifications owing to late relapses after completion of POMP therapy. Newly diagnosed or primary refractory (1 course only) pts with ALL (n=204) or LL (n=27) were treated on the two sequential studies. Burkitt-type leukemia/lymphoma (BLL) and Philadelphia positive ALL were treated on alternative protocols. From May 2000 to December 2001, 69 pts were treated with modified hyper-CVAD with anthracycline intensification (9 induction-consolidation courses). Course 2 was then eliminated from the regimen (8 courses), with an additional 162 pts treated to date (pts age 30 years or less are now treated with augmented BFM). Median age was 43 yrs (range, 15–83). CD20 expression was noted in 49%. Overall CR rate of the evaluable group (n=225) was 93%; 7 pts achieved PR (LL with residual disease), five failed to respond, and 4 died during the induction phase. Three-yr CRD and OS rates were 70% and 62%, respectively after a median follow-up of 50 months (range, 2–106+). In the younger CD20 positive precursor B-cell ALL subset (n=99), rituximab improved outcome compared to historical experience with hyper-CVAD alone (n=127), with 3-yr CRD rates (75% vs 45%, p<.001) and OS rates (65% vs 38%, p<.001) approaching those of their CD20 negative counterparts. In contrast to the Burkitt experience, rituximab was not beneficial for the elderly subgroup (OS rates 28% vs 34%, p NS). Anthracycline intensification did not improve outcome. The addition of rituximab to the hyper-CVAD regimen appears to benefit the younger pts (age less than 60 yrs) with CD20 positive precursor B-cell ALL. Incorporation of rituximab and other monoclonal antibodies (e.g., ofatumumab, epratuzumab) into frontline chemotherapy regimens for ALL should be investigated systematically. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 357-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Marcucci ◽  
Susan Geyer ◽  
John Zhao ◽  
Andrew J Caroll ◽  
Donna Bucci ◽  
...  

Abstract Among the prognostic cytogenetic and molecular aberrations in AML, t(8;21)(q22;q22) and inv(16)(p13q22) and their corresponding molecular rearrangements RUNX1/RUNX1T1 and CBFB/MYH11 (each involving a gene encoding a protein chain of the key transctiption factor CBF), predict for a favorable outcome in pts receiving consolidation with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) after achievement of complete remission (CR). However, approximately 40% of these pts eventually relapse. Approximately 25% of CBF AML pts carry gain-of function mutations in the KIT gene. These mutations result in a constitutively active tyrosine kinase (TK) that contributes to aggressive leukemia growth, and is associated with unfavorable outcome. In addition, CBF AML pts with wild type KIT overexpress this protein, and this is also associated with an inferior outcome. Therefore, inhibiting KIT with DAS is a rational therapeutic strategy in CBF AML. We report here on a phase II trial that combined DAS with standard chemotherapy for CBF AML. Enrollment required molecular confirmation of CBF AML by the Alliance Molecular Pathology central lab using RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing-based assays. Overall, 779 patients were screened for CBF; 69 were found to be CBF-positive and 61 were subsequently enrolled. Newly diagnosed RUNX1/RUNX1T1 or CBFB/MYH11-positive pts received induction chemotherapy with cytarabine (C) 200 mg/m2/day continuous intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1-7, daunorubicin (DNR) 60 mg/m2/d IV bolus on days 1-3 and DAS 100 mg/d PO on days 8-21. Pts with residual disease (>5% blasts) on day 21 after first induction received a re-induction treatment with same doses of C on days 1-5, DNR on days 1-3 and DAS on days 6-19. Pts who achieved CR received consolidation therapy with HiDAC 3000 mg/m2 over 3 hours (if <60 yrs old) or 1000 m/m2 (if older) q12h on days 1,3,5 and DAS 100 mg/d PO on days 6-26 x 4 courses. Pts who remained in CR after consolidation treatments received continuation treatment with DAS 100mg/d PO x 12 months. The primary goal of this study was to insure that the CR rate and survival during induction were not inferior to historical outcomes. Between April 2011 and January 2013, we completed the planned accrual of 61 adult CBF AML pts. Median age was 51 years (yrs; range: 19.6 to 85 yrs), and 15 pts (24%) were older (>60 yrs). Half of pts were male (51%) and a majority were Caucasian (75%). Of all 61 pts, 65% were CBFB/MYH11-positive and 35% were RUNX1/RUNX1T1-positive. Treatment was started on average 4 days from molecular diagnosis (range: 0 to 11 days). To date, 51% of pts are still undergoing treatment; 4 pts died on treatment (2 older), 7 (4 older) had an adverse event requiring treatment interruption, and 6 refused to complete the treatment (mainly the continuation component). Observed toxicities were those expected with C and DNR (hematologic and non-hematologic) and with DAS (nausea, liver toxicity). 55 pts are currently evaluable for treatment-related toxicity. The most common grade 4 toxicities were sepsis (5), acute kidney injury (3), and respiratory failure (3). Grade 5 toxicities included respiratory failure (1) and sepsis (2). Two of these pts died during induction (respiratory failure, sepsis); both were older and CBFB/MYH11. One pt died from sepsis during consolidation in CR (CBFB/MYH11, 48 yrs). The 30-day survival rate was 97% (95% CI: 89% to 99.6%) overall (98% in younger and 93% in older pts). Of 59 pts currently evaluable for response, 54 (92% of all pts; 96% younger and 80% older) achieved CR. Of the 5 patients who failed to achieve CR, 2 had RUNX1/RUNX1T1 and 3 had CBFB/MYH11. Among the 54 CR pts, no younger pt has relapsed, while 2 older pts with CBFB/MYH11 have relapsed. The median follow-up (f/u) was 11.2 months (range: 1.2 to 23.2 mos.). The 1-yr DFS and OS rates were respectively 90% and 87% for all pts; 97% and 95% for younger pts, and 63% and 62% for older pts, respectively. Early results from this study show that 1) rapid screening for CBF AML is feasible within a cooperative group, 2) DAS plus chemotherapy in CBF AML pts is tolerable including in older pts, and 3) the initial clinical outcomes are at least comparable to those historically observed in this patient population. Patients continue to be followed for survival endpoints. Molecular characterization for KIT mutations and expression levels of marrow and blood blasts is ongoing and will be correlated with toxicity and clinical outcome. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2494-2494
Author(s):  
Myriam Ruth Guitter ◽  
Jorge Gabriel Rossi ◽  
Elisa Sajaroff ◽  
Carolina Carrara ◽  
Pizzi Silvia ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Despite the advances observed in the outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment during the last 20 years, relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure in childhood ALL. Several factors have been associated to the prognosis of these patients; however, minimal residual disease (MRD) emerges as a relevant predictor of outcome. Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess MRD by flow-cytometry in relapsed ALL and to evaluate its prognostic impact as a predictor factor of outcome at the end of the induction therapy and prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients and Methods: From Aug'10 to Jun'15, 123 ALL patients were treated at our center. MRD determination at least at two time-points during relapse treatment was a requirement for considering a patient eligible for the present study. Sixty-six cases were excluded due to the following causes: 10 patients died during induction, 2 died early in complete remission (CR), 29 did not respond to chemotherapy, in 13 patients MRD determination was not performed: 4 did not have clinical data available, 4 patients were Down Syndrome and 4 children received treatment for relapse in other centers. Thus, fifty-seven patients achieved CR and were evaluated for MRD at two time points. Of them, 56 patients belonged to S4 and S3 and 1 patient to S1 group as defined by the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster stratification for relapsed ALL. MRD was analyzed by multiparametric flow-cytometry following ALL-IC 2009 guidelines. Negative MRD was defined as disclosing less than 0.1% of blasts. For this analysis, patients were stratified based on MRD levels at two different time points: after end of induction, before HSCT or at any other time point during the follow-up for patients who did not undergo HSCT. Three groups were defined: Group-1: negative at both time points (n= 23), Group-2: positive at 1 time point (n= 13) and Group-3: positive at both time points (n= 21). Patients who relapsed before receiving HSCT were considered Group-3. Twenty-five patients underwent HSCT: 13 of them from Group-1, 9 from Group-2 (2 had positive MRD previous to receive HSCT) and 3 patients from Group-3. HSCT was performed with matched familiar donor in 16 cases and matched unrelated donor in 9 cases. Results: The distribution of events according to receiving or not HSCT was: 5 died due to transplant related mortality (TRM), 9 relapsed after receiving HSCT and 16 during treatment with chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 16 (range: 6-67) months, overall 3-year EFS probability (EFSp) (SE) was 32 (8)%. The 3-year EFSp was 75 (11)% for Group-1, 24 (14)% for Group-2 and 0% for Group-3 (p-value <0.00001). Comparing patients who did not receive HSCT vs. patients who did, EFSp (SE) was 32 (12)% and 29 (11)% respectively (p-value: non-significant). The EFSp (SE) according to MRD groups in patients who underwent HSCT was: Group-1: 53 (19)%, Group-2: 14 (13)% and 0% for Group-3 (p-value: 0.06). Conclusions: MRD quantification by flow-cytometry demonstrated to be a significant prognostic factor for relapsed ALL. Both, TRM and death in CR rates, were high and should be decreased by improving supportive measures. MRD determination by flow-cytometry in patients who underwent HSCT showed a trend to achieve a better EFSp, thus representing a relevant tool for stratifying relapsed ALL patients in order to achieve a better selection of patients to receive HSCT. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1971-1971
Author(s):  
Kalyan Nadiminti ◽  
Kamal Kant Singh Abbi ◽  
Annick Tricot ◽  
Allyson Schultz ◽  
Lindsay Dozeman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Melphalan 200mg/m2 is the standard preparative regimen in MM and addition of other cytotoxic drugs has not been found to result in superior activity. The novel agents have improved outcome in MM significantly, but data on their role in preparative regimens are scarce. The purpose of this study was to understand the toxicity and efficacy of triple therapy with VDT in combination with high-dose melphalan. Methods: An IRB approved retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who received an ASCT with the VDT-Mel during 2012-2014. Mel: 100 mg/m2 was given on days -4 and -1; V: 1 mg/m2 on days -4, -1, +2 and +5; T: 100 mg daily from -5 to +5; and D: 20 mg/day from -4 to -1 and +2 to +5. End points were treatment-related toxicity during the first 100 days and quality of response at 6 months post-transplant; 98 patients had follow-up ≥ 6 months. Patients in sCR were also minimal residual disease negative (MRD-) by 10-color flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-4. Results: 100 patients received 153 transplants; 47 patients underwent single and 53 had tandem transplants (TT); 64 patients received early (≤ 12 months of induction therapy) and 36 salvage transplantation. Median age was 61 y; median followup was 16.2 months. Only 1patient had achieved a sCR and 11 a CR prior to transplantation. Best responses at 6 months were 53% sCR (and MRD-), 24% CR, and 9% VGPR. The sCR rate after single transplant was 47% (overall) and 54% (early transplant) vs 59% and 60% after TT. Grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicities were almost entirely related to infections (38% and 53% in single and TT, respectively); the 100-day mortality rate was 2.6% (4/153), 1.8% for early transplants and 4.5% for salvage transplants. Median time to ANC recovery > 500/µL was 12 days in both early and salvage transplantation. Conclusion: VDT-Mel is well-tolerated and resulted in minimal additional toxicity and a similar mortality rate when compared to historic data of MEL alone. Importantly, the sCR rate with MRD- by flow cytometry at 6 months in our study was very high compared to published reports. The ultimate sCR rate will be higher as at this time an additional 13 patients attained a sCR during further follow up past 6 months for a total of 66% sCR. Since both sCR and MRD- are proven early surrogate markers for progression-free and overall survival, it appears highly likely that this regimen will be superior to Mel alone and should become the new standard for ASCT in myeloma. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document