High Risk Myeloma Is Characterized By the Bi-Allelic Inactivation of CDKN2C and RB1

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4416-4416
Author(s):  
Shweta S. Chavan ◽  
Christoph Heuck ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Rusiana Tytarenko ◽  
Shayu Deshpande ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Genomic Alterations ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Gene Alterations

Abstract Introduction Gene expression and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) underscore the importance of multiple myeloma (MM) being driven by diverse genomic abnormalities and are increasingly being integrated into personalized treatment algorithms to optimize clinical outcomes, in particular that of high risk disease. Furthermore, CGP allow for ultra-deep sequencing of various clinically relevant and targetable genomic alterations using a single assay, with an advantage of detection of low frequency variants. Methods Samples from 578 patients (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, MGUS, (n=19); smoldering multiple myeloma, SMM, (n=42); or multiple myeloma, MM, (n=517; 87 newly diagnosed (NDMM), 107after treatment (TRMM), and 323 at relapse (RLMM)) were analyzed using the FoundationOne® Heme (F1H) assay. 50 ng of DNA and RNA from CD138+ selected cells were analyzed for genomic alterations including base substitutions, indels, copy number alterations, and rearrangements. Sequencing was performed to a median depth of 468x in 405 genes, as well as selected introns of 31 genes involved in rearrangements. Additionally, matched Gene Expression Profiling (GEP) was performed using Affymetrix U133 Plus 2 array, and GEP70-defined risk status and molecular subgroups were calculated. Results Results of the F1H assay revealed the most common alterations in MM to be: KRAS (28.8%), NRAS (23.2%), TP53 (17.4%), BRAF (6.8%), CDKN2C (6.0%), RB1 (5.8%), TRAF3 (5.8%), DNMT3A (3.9%), TET2 (3.7%) and ATM (2.5%), including mutations, homozygous loss and rearrangements. When these frequencies were split across GEP70 risk groups, TP53, CDKN2C/FAF1, RB1, and the t(4;14) were significantly different (p<0.05). As the disease progressed from MGUS to relapse, the number of mutations showed an increasing trend. Likewise, there were significant differences in the number of mutations between CCND1/CCND3 (CD-1) and low bone disease, CD-1 and hyperdiploid, and hyperdiploid and proliferation groups. In order to identify independent prognostic genomic alterations, we performed a multivariate Cox regression analysis on all the gene alterations that were present in at least 5% of the patient cohort, resulting in identification of four significant alterations: the t(4;14), mutation/loss of TP53, CDKN2C/FAF1 or RB1. Alterations in CDKN2C and RB1 were associated with the PR group. When the MM samples were split according to type (NDMM, TRMM, RLMM) the effect on survival of each of these alteration was more pronounced at relapse, but still present at diagnosis for CDKN2C and t(4;14). Bi-allelic events in CDKN2C, TP53 and RB1 were examined, by both homozygous deletion and monosomy with accompanying mutation, showing the rate of inactivation increased from 9.2% in NDMM to 17.9% at relapse, indicating that bi-allelic inactivation of these genes are correlated with relapse. CDKN2C and TP53 are known prognostic markers but the prognostic significance of RB1 has been debated. Previous data have shown that the association of t(4;14) with del(13q) results in insignificance of del(13q) as a prognostic marker in multivariate analyses. Here, we confirmed that the prognostic effect of RB1 is not due to association with t(4;14), and show that patients with either the t(4;14) or alteration of RB1 have a poor prognosis, which is worse when both lesions are present. Conclusions Using the F1H assay, we establish the mutational spectrum in MM, identifying lesions associated with high risk. This is the first study in MM to identify and confirm the poor prognostic effect of RB1 driven by bi-allelic inactivation, which is more prevalent at relapse. Furthermore, we determined the gene alterations that are independent prognostic markers in relapsed MM, thereby identifying novel therapeutic targets. Disclosures He: Foundation Medicine, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bailey:Foundation Medicine, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ashby:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Zhong:foundation medicine: Employment. Nahas:Foundation medicine: Employment. Ali:Foundation Medicine: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vergillo:Foundation Medicine, Inc: Employment. Ross:Foundation Medicine, Inc: Employment. Miller:Foundation Medicine: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stephens:Foundation Medicine: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barlogie:Signal Genetics: Patents & Royalties. Mughal:Foundation Medicine: Employment, Equity Ownership. Davies:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morgan:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Univ of AR for Medical Sciences: Employment.

scholarly journals Prognostic Molecular Stratification in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma - Results of the Pomalidomide Mukseven (NCT02406222) Biomarker Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4327-4327
Author(s):  
James Croft ◽  
Andrew Hall ◽  
Amy L Sherborne ◽  
Katrina Walker ◽  
Sidra Ellis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains challenging as durable remissions are achieved in patient sub-groups only. Identifying patients that are likely to benefit prior to or early after starting relapse treatments remains an unmet need. MUKseven is a trial specifically designed to investigate and validate biomarkers for treatment optimization in a 'real-world' RRMM population. Design In the randomized multi-center phase 2 MUKseven trial, RRMM patients (≥2 prior lines of therapy, exposed to proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide) were randomized 1:1 to cyclophosphamide (500 mg po d1, 8, 15), pomalidomide (4 mg days 1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg; if ≥75 years 20 mg; d1, 8, 15, 21) (CPomD) or PomD and treated until progression. All patients were asked to undergo bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) bio-sampling at baseline, cycle 1 day 14 (C1D14, on-treatment) and relapse. For biomarker discovery and validation, IGH translocations were profiled by qRT-PCR, copy number aberrations by digital MLPA (probemix D006; MRC Holland), GEP by U133plus2.0 array (Affymetrix), PD protein markers by IHC and PB T-cell subsets by flow cytometry for all patients with sufficient material. Primary endpoint was PFS, secondary endpoints included response, OS, safety/toxicity and biomarker validation. Original planned sample size was 250 patients but due to a change in UK standard of care during recruitment with pomalidomide becoming available, a decision was made to stop recruitment early. Results In total, 102 RRMM patients were randomized 1:1 between March 2016 and February 2018. Trial entry criteria were designed to include a real-world RRMM population, permitting transfusions and growth factor support. Median age at randomization was 69 years (range 42-88), 28% of patients had received ≥5 prior lines of therapy (median: 3). Median follow-up for this analysis was 13.4 months (95% CI: 12.0-17.5). 16 patients remained on trial at time of analysis (median number of cycles: 19.5; range 8-28). More patients achieved ≥PR with CPomD compared to PomD: 70.6% (95% CI: 56.2-82.5%) vs. 47.1% (CI: 32.9-61.5%) (P=0.006). Median PFS was 6.9 months (CI: 5.7-10.4) for CPomD vs. 4.6 months (CI: 3.5-7.4) for PomD, which was not significantly different as per pre-defined criteria. Follow-up for OS is ongoing and will be presented at the conference. High-risk genetic aberrations were found at following frequencies: t(4;14): 6%, t(14;16)/t(14;20): 2%, gain(1q): 45%, del(17p): 13%. Non-high risk lesions were present as follows: t(11;14): 22%, hyperdiploidy: 44%. Complete information on all high-risk genetic markers was available for 71/102 patients, of whom 12.7% had double-hit high-risk (≥2 adverse lesions), 46.5% single-hit high-risk (1 adverse lesion) and 40.8% no risk markers, as per our recent meta-analysis in NDMM (Shah V, et al., Leukemia 2018). Median PFS was significantly shorter for double-hit: 3.4 months (CI: 1.0-4.9) vs. single-hit: 5.8 months (CI: 3.7-9.0) or no hit: 14.1 months (CI: 6.9-17.3) (P=0.005) (Figure 1A). GEP was available for 48 patients and the EMC92 high-risk signature, present in 19% of tumors, was associated with significantly shorter PFS: 3.4 months (CI: 2.0-5.7) vs. 7.4 (CI: 3.9-15.1) for EMC92 standard risk (P=0.037). Pharmacodynamic (PD) profiling of cereblon and CRL4CRBN ubiquitination targets (including Aiolos, ZFP91) in BM clots collected at baseline and C1D14 is currently ongoing. Preliminary results for the first 10 patients demonstrate differential change of nuclear Aiolos (Figure 1C), with a major decrease in Aiolos H-scores in 7/10 patients from baseline to C1D14 and reconstitution at relapse. T-cell PB sub-sets were profiled at baseline and C1D14 by flow cytometry. Specific sub-sets increased with therapy from baseline to C1D14, e.g. activated (HLA-DR+) CD4+ T-cells, as reported at last ASH. CD4+ T-cell % at baseline was associated with shorter PFS in these analyses in a multi-variable Cox regression model (P=0.005). PD and T-cell biomarker results will be updated and integrated with molecular tumor characteristics and outcome. Discussion Our results demonstrate that molecular markers validated for NDMM predict treatment outcomes in RRMM, opening the potential for stratified delivery of novel treatment approaches for patients with a particularly high unmet need. Additional immunologic and PD biomarkers are currently being explored. Disclosures Croft: Celgene: Other: Travel expenses. Hall:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Walker:Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research funding to Institution. Pawlyn:Amgen, Janssen, Celgene, Takeda: Other: Travel expenses; Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Amgen, Celgene, Takeda: Consultancy. Flanagan:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Garg:Janssen, Takeda, Novartis: Other: Travel expenses; Novartis, Janssen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Couto:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Wang:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boyd:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pierceall:Celgene: Employment. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cook:Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, Karyopharm, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squib, GlycoMimetics, Seattle Genetics, Sanofi: Honoraria. Brown:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Kaiser:Takeda, Janssen, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene, Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, Abbvie, Karyopharm: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Pmd-107: Marizomib, Pomalidomide and Low Dose-Dexamethasone Combination Study in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (NCT02103335): Full Enrollment Results from a Phase-1 Multicenter, Open Label Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3326-3326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Simon Harrison ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Jeffrey Zonder ◽  
Ashraf Z Badros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Marizomib (MRZ) is a novel, irreversible, pan subunit proteasome inhibitor (PI) with preclinical evidence demonstrating in vitro and in vivo activity in multiple myeloma (MM). This study was designed to evaluate the safety and antimyeloma activity of pomalidomide (POM), MRZ and low dose dexamethasone (Lo-DEX) (PMD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Thirty-eight heavily pretreated patients with RRMM were enrolled [dose-escalation cohort (n=14); recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) cohort (n=24)]. IV MRZ (0.3 to 0.5 mg/m2) was administered on Days (D) 1, 4, 8, 11; POM (3 or 4 mg) on D1 through 21; and Lo-DEX (5 or 10 mg) on D1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 22, 23 of every 28-D cycle. Patients received a median of 4 (range 1-9) prior lines of therapy; 100% received prior lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BTZ), 34% carfilzomib (CFZ), and 50% thalidomide. 53% of patients were refractory to both LEN and BTZ and 21% were refractory to LEN, BTZ, and CFZ. There were no dose limiting toxicities during the study. The most common study treatment related ≥Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (11/38 pts: 29%), pneumonia (4/38 pts 11%), anemia (4/38 pts; 11%), thrombocytopenia (4/38 pts; 11%), and febrile neutropenia (2/38 pts; 5%), with two grade 4 AEs (neutropenia related to POM and viral infection related to DEX), and one grade 5 AE (cardio-respiratory arrest from a suspected PE related to POM). Overall, MRZ was well tolerated, did not add to the incidence or severity of POM/Lo-DEX AEs and the regimen may have fewer hematological and infectious AEs compared to that observed with POM/Lo-DEX. MRZ pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that it was rapidly cleared with a short T1/2 (6.2-11mins) and a large volume of distribution (41-86L) suggesting extensive tissue distribution. Pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated rapid and robust inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity in both packed whole blood (PWB) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs), reflecting the irreversible binding nature of MRZ. Evolving inhibition of trypsin-like and caspase-like proteasome activity was also observed in PWB and PBMC with continued dosing. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) for the 36 response evaluable patients was 53% (19/36) and 64% (23/36), respectively (Table 1). Subpopulation analysis demonstrated an ORR of 50% (5/10) in high risk cytogenetic patients, 56% (10/18) in LEN/BTZ refractory patients, 71% (5/7) in LEN/BTZ/CFZ refractory patients and 80% (8/10) in CFZ refractory patients. These data compare favorably against POM/Lo-Dex with a near doubling of ORR in both the total patient population and the double refractory patients. Substantial activity in high-risk patients that are triple refractory and in patients that are refractory to CFZ in prior last regimen was observed. MRZ activity in RRMM patients exposed and/or refractory to multiple PIs is likely a consequence of its unique pan proteasome subunit inhibitory actions. In conclusion, MRZ in combination with POM and Lo-DEX was well tolerated and demonstrated promising activity in heavily pretreated, high-risk RRMM patients. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Harrison: Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. Zonder:Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: DSMC membership. Khot:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacLaren:Triphase Accelerator: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reich:Triphase Accelerator: Consultancy. Trikha:Encycle Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Triphase Accelerator: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Crowdsourced High-Risk Classifiers for Multiple Myeloma Patients Commonly Identify PHF19 As a Robust Progression Biomarker

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4370-4370
Author(s):  
Michael J Mason ◽  
Carolina D. Schinke ◽  
Christine Eng ◽  
Fadi Towfic ◽  
Fred Gruber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells residing within the bone marrow with 25,000-30,000 patients diagnosed in the United States each year. The disease's clinical course depends on a complex interplay chromosomal abnormalities and mutations within plasma cells and patient socio-demographic factors. Novel treatments extended the time to disease progression and overall survival for the majority of patients. However, a subset of 15%-20% of MM patients exhibit an aggressive disease course with rapid disease progression and poor overall survival regardless of treatment. Accurately predicting which patients are at high-risk is critical to designing studies with a better understanding of myeloma progression and enabling the discovery of novel therapeutics that extend the progression free period of these patients. To date, most MM risk models use patient demographic data, clinical laboratory results and cytogenetic assays to predict clinical outcome. High-risk associated cytogenetic alterations include deletion of 17p or gain of 1q as well as t(14;16), t(14;20), and most commonly t(4,14), which leads to juxtaposition of MMSET with the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus promoter, resulting in overexpression of the MMSET oncogene. While cytogenetic assays, in particular fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), are widely available, their risk prediction is sub-optimal and recently developed gene expression based classifiers predict more accurately rapid progression. To investigate possible improvements to models of myeloma risk, we organized the Multiple Myeloma DREAM Challenge, focusing on predicting high-risk, defined as disease progression or death prior to 18 months from diagnosis. This effort combined 4 discovery datasets providing participants with clinical, cytogenetic, demographic and gene expression data to facilitate model development while retaining 4 additional datasets, whose clinical outcome was not publicly available, in order to benchmark submitted models. This crowd-sourced effort resulted in the unbiased assessment of 171 predictive algorithms on the validation dataset (N = 823 unique patient samples). Analysis of top performing methods identified high expression of PHF19, a histone methyltransferase, as the gene most strongly associated with disease progression, showing greater predictive power than the expression level of the putative high-risk gene MMSET. We show that a simple 4 feature model composed of age, stage and the gene expression of PHF19 and MMSET is as accurate as much larger published models composed of over 50 genes combined with ISS and age. Results from this work suggest that combination of gene expression and clinical data increases accuracy of high risk models which would improve patient selection in the clinic. Disclosures Towfic: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dalton:MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding. Ortiz:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trotter:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dervan:Celgene: Employment. Flynt:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dai:M2Gen: Employment. Bassett:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sonneveld:SkylineDx: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shain:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Munshi:Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Morgan:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation, Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel expenses. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

A New Multinational Observational Study In Multiple Myeloma: Initial Report Of The PREAMBLE Study

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1964-1964
Author(s):  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Mehdi M. Moezi ◽  
Robin Foà ◽  
Gordon Cook ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Novel Therapies ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
The Us ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Introduction The advent of novel immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have improved clinical outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) in the past decade. Clinical trial data have shown combination novel therapies (IMiD+PI) can provide even further improvement. The PREAMBLE (Prospective Research Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: an Observational Evaluation) is a global study designed to evaluate clinical effectiveness, healthcare resource utilization, and patient-reported outcomes associated with novel therapies for treatment of relapsed or refractory MM (R/R MM) in the real-world daily practices in the US and Europe. We describe the study design and baseline characteristics of the first 111 patients enrolled. Methods This is a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of adult patients with R/R MM who received at least 1 prior therapy and initiated treatment with IMiDs, PIs, or IMiDs+PIs within 90 days prior to or 30 days after enrollment. Follow-up is up to 3 yrs after consent. Patients receive standard of care treatment as determined by the treating physician. Planned enrollment is 1000 patients in North America (NA) and Europe (EU; France, Germany, Italy, and UK). Results As of June 28, 2013, 111 patients from 63 sites in NA (n=64) and EU (n=47) have been enrolled. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Cytogenetics (by FISH) was determined in 51% (n=57) of patients; of these, 16% (n=9) were high risk with del 17p (78%) as the predominant abnormality. Baseline treatment varied by region: of the patients in NA, IMiDs were used in 44% (n=28), PIs in 36% (n=23), and IMiD+PI in 20% (n=13) versus 60% (n=28), 34% (n=16), and 6% (n=3), respectively, in EU. Of the 16% high risk patients and the 25% of patients initially diagnosed at ISS stage III, none received IMiD+PI. The percentage of patients who received only 1 prior regimen at enrollment was 46% (n=26) in the IMiD group, 41% (n=16) in the PI group, and 63% (n=10) in the IMiD+PI group while the percentage of patients who received 3 or more prior regimens was 16% (n=9) in the IMiD group, 36% (n=14) in the PI group, and 6% (n=1) in the IMiD+PI group. Median time from diagnosis to enrollment for patients receiving IMiDs was 43 months, PIs was 42 months, and IMiDs+PIs was 33 months. Conclusion PREAMBLE provides a rich data source for evaluation of clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes in patients treated for R/R MM. Initial data suggest different treatment patterns between patients in the US and in EU. Continued follow-up and larger sample size may help identify factors associated with different treatment choices and impact on clinical effectiveness, tolerability, resource utilization, and humanistic outcomes in patients treated for R/R MM. Disclosures: Vij: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Lilly: Honoraria. Palumbo:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kaya:Millennium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Durie:Millennium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Cella:BMS: Consultancy. Annemans:BMS: Consultancy. Su:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Le:BMS: Employment. Petrucci:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria.

The Multiple Myeloma Genome Project: Development of a Molecular Segmentation Strategy for the Clinical Classification of Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 196-196
Author(s):  
Brian A Walker ◽  
Mehmet K. Samur ◽  
Konstantinos Mavrommatis ◽  
Cody Ashby ◽  
Christopher P Wardell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Genome Project ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Segmentation Strategy ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction Segmenting multiple myeloma (MM) into subgroups with distinct pathogenesis and clinical behavior is important in order to move forward with advancements in therapy and implement a targeted therapy approach. Current technologies have elucidated five major translocation groups, which have a varying effect on prognosis: t(4;14), t(6;14), t(11;14), t(14;16) and t(14;20) along with recurrent copy number changes including deletion of CDKN2C (1p32.3) and TP53 (17p13.1) as well as gain or amplification of 1q21. However, minor translocation and mutational groups are poorly described because sample numbers are limited in small datasets. The availability of multiple sets of high quality mutation data associated with clinical outcomes has provided a unique opportunity in MM whereby clustering mutational data with chromosomal aberrations in the context of gene expression we can develop a molecular classification system to segment the disease into therapeutically meaningful subgroups. The Multiple Myeloma Genome Project (MGP) is a global collaborative initiative that aims to develop a molecular segmentation strategy for MM to develop clinically relevant tests that could improve diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients with MM. Materials and methods We have established a set of 2161 patients for which whole exome sequencing (WES; n=1436), Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS; n=708), targeted panel sequencing (n=993) and expression data from RNA-Seq and Gene Expression arrays (n=1497) were available. These data were derived from the Myeloma XI trial (UK), Intergroupe Francophone du Myeloma/Dana-Faber Cancer Institute (MA), The Myeloma Institute (AR) and the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (IA1 - IA8). We assembled all data on a secure site and analyzed it using a streamlined and consistent pipeline using state of the art tools. First, BAM were converted to FASTQ using Picard tools v2.1.1 to extract read sequences and base quality scores. Next, all reads were realigned to the human genome assembly hg19 using BWA-mem. Duplicate marking and sorting was performed using Picard tools v2.1.1. For QAQC we use FASTQC and Picard tools. We identified somatic single nucleotide variants and indels with Mutect2 using default parameters. Translocations and large chromosomal aberrations were identified using MANTA and breakdancer and inferred copy number abnormalities and homozygous deletions using Sequenza v2.1.2 and ControlFreeC. Results We have begun to integrate these diverse large genomic datasets with various correlates. Samples were stratified by RNA-seq expression values and WES/WGS to identify the main cytogenetic groups with high concordance. In addition to the main translocation groups, translocations into MAFA, t(8;14), were detected in 1.2% of samples by both RNA-seq and WES/WGS. RNA-seq also detected fusion transcripts, including the known Ig-WHSC1 transcript in t(4;14). However, a proportion of identified in-frame fusion genes involved kinase domains consistent with activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway, which may be clinical targets for therapy. The main recurrent mutations included KRAS and NRAS, and negative regulators of the NF-κB pathway. In addition we identified recurrent copy number abnormalities and examined the interaction of these with mutations. This highlighted the interaction of the recurrent changes at 1p, 13q, and 17p with mutation of genes located within these regions, specifically indicating bi-allelic inactivation of CDKN2C, RB1 and TP53. Using WGS and RNA-Seq data we identified recurrent translocations and fusion genes that can be used to instruct therapy. Based on these data and the presence of homogeneous inactivation of key tumor expressed genes we will present clinically relevant clusters of MM that can form the basis of future risk and molecular targeted trials. Interaction of mutation with expression patterns has identified distinct expression signatures associated with mutational groups. Conclusions We have established the largest repository of molecular profiling data in MM along with associated clinical outcome data. Integrated analyses of these are enabling generation of clinically meaningful disease segments associated with differing risk. The MGP intends to build a global network by expanding collaboration with leading MM centers around the world and incorporating additional datasets through current and new collaborations. Disclosures Mavrommatis: Discitis DX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ashby:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Ortiz:Celgene: Employment. Towfic:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership; Immuneering Corp: Equity Ownership. Amatangelo:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yu:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Avet-Loiseau:celgene: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; sanofi: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy. Jackson:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Munshi:Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Oncopep: Patents & Royalties. Morgan:Univ of AR for Medical Sciences: Employment; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 804-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bustoros ◽  
Chia-jen Liu ◽  
Kaitlen Reyes ◽  
Kalvis Hornburg ◽  
Kathleen Guimond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background. This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods. Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al., Blood 2014. The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and Dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. This induction phase is followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle is defined as 28 consecutive days, and therapy is administered for a total of 24 cycles total. Bone marrow samples from all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment, whole exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle to isolate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Stem cell collection is planned for all eligible patients. Results. In total, 26 of the planned 56 patients were enrolled in this study from February 2017 to April 2018. The median age of the patients enrolled was 63 years (range, 41 to 73) with 12 males (46.2%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 18 patients. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 11 patients (61.1%). The median number of cycles completed was 8 cycles (3-15). The most common toxicities were fatigue (69.6%), followed by rash (56.5%), and neutropenia (56.5%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (13%), and neutropenia (8.7%). One patient had grade 4 neutropenia during treatment. Additionally, grade 4 hyperglycemia occurred in another patient. As of this abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who had at least 3 cycles of treatment was 89% (23/26), with 5 Complete Responses (CR, 19.2%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 34.6%), 9 partial responses (34.6%), and 3 Minimal Responses (MR, 11.5%). None of the patients have shown progression to overt MM to date. Correlative studies including WES of plasma cells and single-cell RNA sequencing of the bone microenvironment cells are ongoing to identify the genomic and transcriptomic predictors for the differential response to therapy as well as for disease evolution. Furthermore, we are analyzing the cfDNA and CTCs of the patients at different time points to investigate their use in monitoring minimal residual disease and disease progression. Conclusion. The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma. The high response rate, convenient schedule with minimal toxicity observed to date are promising in this patient population at high risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Further studies and longer follow up for disease progression are warranted. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibitors Reverse the Stromal Adhesion Phenotype of Ikaros-Mutant B-ALL, Induce Apopotosis, and Synergize with ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A New Paradigm for Pathogenesis and Therapy of High-Risk B-ALL

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 285-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ila Joshi ◽  
Nilamani Jena ◽  
Toshimi Yoshida ◽  
Leto Paraskevopoulou ◽  
Zhihong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
B Lymphoid ◽  
Inhibitor Treatment

Abstract B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is a malignancy of precursor B-lymphocytes affecting both children and adults. Deletions and dominant-negative mutations in IKZF1, the gene encoding the Ikaros transcription factor, are found in ~85% of Ph+ B-ALL and in some cases of Ph– B-ALL, and are associated with poor prognosis. Genomic studies of high-risk Ph– or “Ph-like” B-ALLs have revealed frequent mutation and activation of TK genes and signaling pathways. While ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as dasatinib and imatinib have been added to chemotherapy regimens for Ph+ B-ALL, over half of these patients will still relapse, which correlates with residual disease burden in the bone marrow (BM) following induction therapy. Hence, new therapeutic strategies are needed for patients with Ikaros-mutant, high-risk Ph+ and Ph– B-ALL. Using mice with a conditional Ikzf1 mutation (Ike5fl) where the recombined allele is similar to the dominant-negative Ik6 mutant found in human B-ALL, we demonstrated recently that Ikaros DNA-binding function is required in the B-lymphoid lineage for transition from the large to small pre-B cell stage of differentiation, and that arrest at this stage of development can give rise to B-ALL (Joshi et al., Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:294). The survival and proliferation of Ikaros mutant pre-B cells is dependent on increased integrin-mediated stromal adhesion and activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK). FAK is a non-receptor TK, downstream of integrins and growth factor receptors, which plays important roles in cancer stem cell biology, the tumor microenvironment and tumorigenesis. VS-4718 and VS-6063 (defactinib) are potent, orally bioavailable FAK inhibitors that inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in preclinical models, and are currently under evaluation in clinical trials in patients with various solid tumors. VS-6063 has demonstrated tolerability and preliminary signs of clinical activity as a single agent and in combination with paclitaxel in phase I trials (ASCO, 2014). Here, we show that BCR-ABL1 cooperates with Ikzf1 mutation to accelerate B-leukemogenesis in mice. BCR-ABL1+ Ikaros-mutant B-ALLs exhibit stroma-mediated resistance to ABL1 TKIs, while the FAK inhibitors VS-4718 and VS-6063 are effective in blocking stromal adhesion and inducing apoptosis in both mouse and human Ikaros-mutant B-ALL samples. To test whether dysregulation of TK signaling cooperates with Ikzf1 mutation in the pathogenesis of high-risk B-ALL, we isolated BM B-lymphoid progenitor cells from wild-type (WT), IkE5fl/+ CD2-Cre, and IkE5fl/fl CD2-Cre donors, transduced them with BCR-ABL1 retrovirus and transplanted the cells into recipient mice. We observed a dramatic acceleration of precursor B-lymphoid leukemia induced by BCR-ABL1 in IkE5Δ/+ and particularly in IkE5Δ/Δ donor cells that correlated with a striking (~30-fold) increase in the frequency of engrafting leukemia-initiating or leukemic stem cells (LSCs). Relative to Ikzf1 WT BCR-ABL1+ leukemic cells, Ikzf1-mutant BCR-ABL1+ blasts showed significant resistance to imatinib and dasatinib that was dependent on the presence of OP9 stroma. The effect of FAK inhibition, using the FAK inhibitors VS-4718, VS-6062, and VS-6063 (Verastem), was first tested on murine B-ALL cells (genotypes Ikzf1 mutant, Ikzf1 mutant BCR-ABL1+, and Ikzf1 WT BCR-ABL1+) grown on OP9 stroma. FAK inhibitor treatment abolished stromal adhesion of Ikzf1-mutant B-ALL and induced apoptosis in non-adherent cells, but had little effect on Ikzf1 WT B-ALL cells. VS-4718 and VS-6063 were each synergistic with dasatinib in reducing the viability of Ikzf1-mutant BCR-ABL1+ B-ALL cells cultured on OP9 stroma. For primary human B-ALL samples grown on OP9 stroma, IKZF1-mutant cells were also more sensitive to FAK inhibitor treatment than WT IKZF1 WT B-ALL, with or without BCR-ABL1 expression. Collectively, these observations suggest a new model to explain the pathogenesis of high-risk B-ALL and its resistance to therapy. B-ALLs with IKZF1 mutations may be resistant to TKIs and to chemotherapy by virtue of their stromal adhesion phenotype, resulting in failure to eliminate BM LSCs. Inhibition of FAK signaling in Ph+ or Ph­–IKZF1-mutant B-ALL may reverse the stromal-mediated resistance to ABL1 TKIs and/or chemotherapy. Therefore, FAK inhibitors warrant further investigation for the treatment of high-risk IKZF1-mutant B-ALL patients. Disclosures Joshi: Verastem: Research Funding. Yoshida:Verastem, Inc.: Research Funding. Paraskevopoulou:Verastem, Inc.: Research Funding. Zhang:Verastem, Inc.: Research Funding. Krause:Glycomimetics. Inc.: Research Funding. Shapiro:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weaver:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pachter:Verastem Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Georgopoulos:Verastem, Inc.: Research Funding.

A Phase I/II Trial of the KSP Inhibitor ARRY-520 In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1959-1959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Sheeba Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ksp Inhibitor

Abstract Abstract 1959 Background: Kinesin Spindle Protein (KSP) is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Inhibition of KSP induces mitotic arrest and cell death. ARRY-520 is a potent, selective KSP inhibitor. Cancers such as multiple myeloma (MM) which depend on the short-lived survival protein MCL-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520. ARRY-520 shows potent activity in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ARRY-520 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 2 q 2 weeks without/with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM with 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent, unless ineligible for or refusing to receive this therapy) were eligible. Cohorts of at least 3 pts were enrolled in a classical 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Pts were treated for 2 cycles (4 weeks) to evaluate safety prior to dose escalation. Results: Twenty five pts have been treated to date, with a median age of 60 years (range 44–79) and a median of 5 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received prior bortezomib or carfilzomib, 21 pts received prior lenalidomide, 17 pts prior thalidomide, and 18 pts had a prior stem cell transplant. Pts received ARRY-520 without G-CSF at 1 mg/m2/day (n = 3), and at 1.25 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Grade 4 neutropenia was observed at 1.25 mg/m2/day, and this was considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the DLT, dose escalation with prophylactic G-CSF support was initiated, at doses of 1.5 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable), 2.0 mg/m2/day (n = 6) and 2.25 mg/m2/day (n = 2) with G-CSF. Both the 2.0 mg/m2/day and 2.25 mg/m2/day dose levels were determined to be non-tolerated, with DLTs of febrile neutropenia (FN) (2 pts at 2.0 mg/m2/day and both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day) and Grade 3 mucositis (both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day). One out of 6 evaluable pts at 1.5 mg/m2/day also developed a DLT of FN. In an attempt to optimize the Phase 2 dose, an intermediate dose level of 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF is currently being evaluated. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) include those observed with other KSP inhibitors, such as hematological AEs (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia), fatigue, mucositis and other gastro-intestinal AEs. Pts displayed linear PK, a low clearance and a moderate volume of distribution, with moderate-to-high inter-individual variability in PK parameters. The median terminal elimination half life is 65 hours. The preliminary efficacy signal as a single agent is encouraging with 2 partial responses (PR) observed to date per IMWG and EBMT criteria in a heavily pretreated population (23 evaluable pts). A bortezomib-refractory pt with 8 prior lines of therapy, including a tandem transplant, treated at 1 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520 obtained a PR after Cycle 6, with urine protein and kappa light chain levels continuing to decline over time. He remains on-study after 15 months of ARRY-520 treatment. A pt with 2 prior lines of therapy, including prior carfilzomib, has obtained a PR after Cycle 8 at 2 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520, and she is currently ongoing after 4.5 months on therapy. Fifteen pts had a best response of stable disease (SD), including 1 pt with a thus far unconfirmed minimal response, and 6 had progressive disease. A total of 10 pts (43%) achieved a PR or SD lasting > 12 weeks. Several additional pts have shown other evidence of clinical activity, with decrease in paraproteins, increase in hemoglobin levels and regression of plasmacytomas. The median number of cycles is 4 (range 1–28+). Treatment activity has not correlated with any baseline characteristics or disease parameters to date. Conclusions: : The selective KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 has been well tolerated, and shows promising signs of single agent clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with RR MM. Prophylactic G-CSF has enabled higher doses to be tolerated. No cardiovascular or liver enzyme toxicity has been reported. Enrollment is ongoing at 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support, and a planned Phase 2 part of the study will be initiated as soon as the MTD is determined. Complete Phase 1 data will be disclosed at the time of the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Revlimid (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Zonder:Millennium: Consultancy, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event, Research Funding; Celgene:; Novartis:; Proteolix: . Weber:novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy. Walker:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Freeman:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rush:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ptaszynski:Array Biopharma: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of an Anti–Interleukin-6 Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody, Siltuximab (CNTO 328), in Patients with B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, or Castleman's Disease

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1365-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanyi Xie ◽  
Lilian Y Li ◽  
Razelle Kurzrock ◽  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
Xiang Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Castleman’S Disease ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 1365 Introduction Siltuximab (CNTO 328) is a chimeric, murine-human, monoclonal antibody that specifically binds human interleukin (IL)-6 with high affinity. C-reactive protein (CRP) can be a pharmacodynamic (PD) marker of IL-6 bioactivity, i.e., reductions in CRP suggest inhibition of systemic IL-6. A population mechanistic pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD model was developed to describe the relationship between siltuximab serum concentrations and CRP suppression in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), multiple myeloma (MM), or Castleman's disease (CD). Simulation was used to support the dose selection in the CD registration study and future clinical studies. Methods PK/PD data were obtained from a phase 1 clinical study examining multiple dosing regimens of siltuximab administered intravenously in patients with NHL, MM, or CD. Dosing regimens included siltuximab 2.8, 5.5, or 11 mg/kg every 2 weeks; 11 mg/kg every 3 weeks; or 5.5 mg/kg every week. Serial samples to determine serum concentration of siltuximab and serial CRP samples were collected following the first dose. NONMEM 7 was used to simultaneously fit a two-compartment PK model and an inhibitory indirect-response PD model to the observed data. Simulation of 1000 replications was then used to identify siltuximab dosage regimens that would maintain CRP suppression below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1 mg/L. Results The mechanistic PK/PD model was able to describe the serum siltuximab and CRP concentration-time profiles. Volume of distribution and systemic clearance rate constant of siltuximab were estimated at 68.42 mL/kg and 0.0584/day, respectively. The PD parameter estimates (Kin and Kout of CRP) were 5.03 mg/L/day and 0.457/day, respectively, and were similar between the three disease types in this study. IC50was estimated at 9.73 μg/mL and was also similar between disease types. For all disease types, simulations showed that siltuximab 11 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks after the second dose would reduce serum CRP to below the LLOQ throughout the entire treatment period. However, lower dose intensive schedules, including a dose of 5.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks, would not reduce CRP to below the LLOQ at any time point during the treatment period. Conclusion The population PK/PD modeling and simulation support using a siltuximab dose of 11 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks in future clinical development studies. This dosing recommendation is supported by the observed efficacy dose-response relationship in patients with CD (J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3701–8). Disclosures: Xie: Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kurzrock:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding. van Rhee:Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding. Qin:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reddy:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Qi:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Davis:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhou:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Puchalski:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Relationship Between Lenalidomide Dose Modification and Duration Of Treatment In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2944-2944
Author(s):  
Kathy Lang ◽  
Gary Binder ◽  
Iris Lin ◽  
Dejan Milentijevic ◽  
Huan Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Medical Claims ◽  
Dose Modification ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Change ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Introduction A number of studies have shown clinical benefits for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who continue to stay on therapy with lenalidomide (LEN), including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (Palumbo A, et al. NEJM. 2013, McCarthy P, et al. NEJM. 2013, Boccadoro. JCO. 2013). Dose modification is one factor used by physicians to achieve sustained duration of treatment (DOT), particularly to manage toxicities and/or pursue a continuous therapy regimen; in a clinical trial of LEN in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients (pts) followed-up for a median of 30 mos, 42% of pts experienced a dose reduction (Palumbo A, et al. NEJM. 2012). This analysis evaluated whether there is supporting evidence, in a real-world setting, for physicians using LEN dose modification to achieve a longer time on therapy. Objective Medical claims analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between lenalidomide (LEN), dose modification and DOT among patients with NDMM. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a claims database from a large US payer, covering approximately 14 million commercially insured and Medicare advantage members. Patients with at least two outpatient or one inpatient medical claims associated with a diagnosis of MM (ICD-9-CM code: 203.0x) between Jan 1, 2008 and Oct 31, 2012 were extracted from the database. Index date was defined as the date of the first diagnosis of MM. A minimum of 12 months pre-index and 6 months post-index enrollment with no MM treatment was required to define the NDMM patient population. To avoid DOT limitations imposed by fixed-length induction therapy, only pts without claims for stem cell transplant (SCT) were evaluated. DOT was compared among the group treated with LEN who had dose modification (increase or decrease in number of mg per day) relative to the group with no dose modification. Results Among the 236 pts meeting the inclusion criteria, 69 (29%) pts had LEN dose reductions, 15 (6%) had dose increases, and 152 (64%) had no dose change. DOT in pts without a dose change was 7.33 months ± 7.62 (mean ± SD), while pts who had a dose reduction had significantly longer DOT of 14.63 months ± 10.47 (p<0.01). Of the 69 pts with dose reductions, DOT before dose reduction was 5.18 months ± 4.82 compared with 9.46 months ± 10.26 after dose reduction (p<0.01, paired). The subset of pts who were still on LEN therapy at the end of the data window (N=27) showed a similar association between dose reduction and DOT, with DOT of 20.29 months ± 11.62 and 11.99 months ± 9.29 in dose reduction and non-dose reduction subgroups (p<0.01), respectively. Conclusion NDMM pts who had dose reductions of LEN had twice the duration of therapy compared with pts without dose reductions. This analysis suggests that dose modification of MM treatment may be an effective tool to help pts achieve the benefits associated with longer time on therapy. Future clinical studies are needed to determine the best approaches to dose adjustment to improve disease control. Disclosures: Lang: Celgene: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is a thalidomide analog indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma, in combination with dexamethasone, in patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Binder:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lin:Celgene: Research Funding. Milentijevic:Celgene: Consultancy. Huang:Celgene: Research Funding. Nagarwala:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Harwin:Celgene: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document