scholarly journals Analysis of antibiotic treatment of children in a Shanghai tertiary hospital based on point prevalence surveys

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang-Jiang Xu ◽  
Jie Gao ◽  
Jun-Hua Guo ◽  
Li-Li Song

Abstract Background Misuse and overuse of antibiotics by physicians in the treatment of children is common in China. This study aimed to reveal the overall use of antibiotics to treat children hospitalized in four types of pediatric wards. Methods Seven independent point prevalence surveys (PPSs) were conducted in Shanghai Children’s Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University over the period 2012 to 2018. Pediatric ward types were defined general pediatric medical, pediatric surgical, pediatric intensive care units (PICU), and neonatal. Results A total of 3975 pediatric patients were included in the study, of which 63.9% received at least one dose antibiotic. The top five classes of antibiotics administered were cephalosporins (43.8%, n = 1743), penicillins (13.2%, n = 526), carbapenems (8.7%, n = 347), nitroimidazoles (7.1%, n = 281) and macrolides (6.5%, n = 257). The five most commonly used generic antibiotics were cefuroxime (14.9%, n = 594), ceftriaxone (9.7%, n = 387), cefotaxime (9.0%, n = 358), meropenem (8.1%, n = 320) and ampicillin/sulbactam (6.0%, n = 239). Meropenem was among top five antibiotics prescribed in the general pediatric, PICU and neonatal wards and sixth in the pediatric surgical wards. Of all children on antibiotics, 23.4% received prophylactic treatment, and prophylaxis accounted for 68.1% of indications for treatment in the pediatric surgical wards. Conclusions Given that over-treatment with third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems has been associated with treatment-resistant infections, the prescription of these drugs should be strictly controlled and monitored, and measures should be taken to improve the management of surgical prophylaxis in hospitalized children in China.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kwame Afriyie ◽  
Israel A Sefah ◽  
Jacqueline Sneddon ◽  
William Malcolm ◽  
Rachel McKinney ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Improved knowledge regarding antimicrobial use in Ghana is needed to reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This includes point prevalence studies (PPSs) in hospitals. Objectives were to: (i) provide baseline data in two hospitals [Keta Municipal Hospital (KMH) and Ghana Police Hospital (GPH)] and identify priorities for improvement; (ii) assess the feasibility of conducting PPSs; and (iii) compare results with other studies. Methods Standard PPS design using the Global PPS paper forms, subsequently transferred to their template. Training undertaken by the Scottish team. Quality indicators included: rationale for use; stop/review dates; and guideline compliance. Results Prevalence of antibiotic use was 65.0% in GPH and 82.0% in KMH. Penicillins and other β-lactam antibiotics were the most frequently prescribed in both hospitals, with third-generation cephalosporins mainly used in GPH. Antibiotic treatment was mainly empirical and commonly administered intravenously, duration was generally short with timely oral switching and infections were mainly community acquired. Encouragingly, there was good documentation of the indications for antibiotic use in both hospitals and 50.0%–66.7% guideline compliance (although for many indications no guideline existed). In addition, almost all prescribed antibiotics had stop dates and there were no missed doses. The duration of use for surgical prophylaxis was generally more than 1 day (69.0% in GPH and 77.0% in KMH). Conclusions These two hospitals were the first in Ghana to use the Global PPS system. We found the PPS was feasible, relatively rapid and achieved with limited training. Targets for improvement identified included reduction of broad-spectrum antibiotics and duration of treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S404-S404
Author(s):  
Marie-Astrid Lefebvre ◽  
Ann Versporten ◽  
Marie Carrier ◽  
Sandra Chang ◽  
Jeannette L Comeau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inappropriate antimicrobial use (AMU) is strongly associated with antimicrobial resistance. The Global Point Prevalence Survey (Global-PPS) is a standardized tool that is used worldwide to characterize inpatient AMU. We report pediatric results from 26 Canadian hospitals that participated in the Global-PPS in 2018. Methods The survey was completed by each site on the Global-PPS website for all patients aged 0–17 years hospitalized in a neonatal or pediatric ward on a chosen day between January and December 2018. Data collected included ward type, demographics, antimicrobials prescribed, diagnosis, type of indication (community-acquired [CA] vs. healthcare-associated [HA]) and type of therapy (empiric vs. targeted). Quality indicators included guideline compliance, medical record documentation of diagnosis, antimicrobial stop/review date, and surgical prophylaxis (SP) duration. Results Of the 26 sites, 23 were mixed and 3 were pediatric hospitals, with data on 767 inpatients. Overall, 25.8% (n = 198) of patients received at least one antimicrobial, and 21.9% (n = 168) were on at least one antibiotic. The highest AMU was found in Hematology-Oncology (84%), Pediatric Intensive Care (55.3%) and surgical (42.1%) units. Of the 330 antimicrobial prescriptions, 40.9% were for CA infections, 23% for medical prophylaxis, 20% for HA infections and 2.7% for SP. The most commonly treated infections were sepsis (16%) and lower respiratory tract infection (12.1%). The top five prescribed antibiotics were aminopenicillins (20.4%), aminoglycosides (16.1%), third-generation cephalosporins (15.4%), piperacillin–tazobactam (7.5%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (7.5%). Diagnosis and stop/review date were documented for 88.1% and 65.1% of prescriptions, respectively. Compliance to local guidelines was found in 91.5% of therapies. SP exceeded 24 hours in 88.9% of courses. Conclusion The Global-PPS generated Canada-wide data on inpatient pediatric AMU, which will allow hospitals to benchmark and develop local quality improvement interventions to enhance appropriate AMU. Targets for improvement include suboptimal antimicrobial stop/review date documentation and prolonged SP. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-479
Author(s):  
Brian R. Lee ◽  
Alison C. Tribble ◽  
Jeffrey S. Gerber ◽  
Adam L. Hersh ◽  
Matthew P. Kronman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gürkan Atay ◽  
Demet Demirkol

AbstractTherapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a treatment administered with the aim of removing a pathogenic material or compound causing morbidity in a variety of neurologic, hematologic, renal, and autoimmune diseases. In this study, we aimed to assess the indications, efficacy, reliability, complications, and treatment response of pediatric patients for TPE. This retrospective study analyzed data from 39 patients aged from 0 to 18 years who underwent a total of 172 TPE sessions from January 2015 to April 2018 in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. Indications for TPE were, in order of frequency, macrophage activation syndrome (28.2%, n = 11), renal transplantation rejection (15.4%, n = 6), liver failure (15.4%, n = 6), Guillain–Barre's syndrome (15%, n = 6), hemolytic uremic syndrome (7.7%, n = 3), acute demyelinating disease (7.7%, n = 3), septic shock (5.1%, n = 2), and intoxication (5.1%, n = 2). No patient had any adverse event related to the TPE during the procedure. The TPE session was ended prematurely in one patient due to insufficient vascular access and lack of blood flow (2.6%). In the long term, thrombosis due to the indwelling central catheter occurred (5.1%, n = 2). TPE appears to be an effective first-stage or supplementary treatment in a variety of diseases, may be safely used in pediatric patients, and there are significant findings that its area of use will increase. In experienced hands and when assessed carefully, it appears that the rate of adverse reactions and vascular access problems may be low enough to be negligible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S681-S681
Author(s):  
Brian R Lee ◽  
Jason Newland ◽  
Jennifer Goldman

Abstract Background Studies have shown that over half of hospitalized children receive an antibiotic during their encounter, of which between 30-50% is considered inappropriate. Antibiotic prescribing is further complicated as approximately 10% of children are labeled beta-lactam allergic, resulting in the use of either broad-spectrum or suboptimal therapy. The purpose of this study was to compare antibiotic prescribing between patients with a documented ADR vs. those without using a nationwide sample of hospitalized children. Methods We performed a point prevalence study among 32 hospitals between July 2016-December 2017 where data were collected via chart review on pediatric patient and antimicrobial characteristics, including the indication for all antimicrobials. In additional, ADR history data were collected on which antimicrobial(s) were documented (e.g., penicillin, cephalosporins). Patients were mutually assigned into either: 1) no documented ADR; 2) penicillin ADR-only; 3) cephalosporin ADR-only; and 4) ADR for both penicillin and cephalosporin. The distribution of antibiotics were compared between the ADR groups, stratified by the indication for treatment. Results A total of 12,250 pediatric patients (17,929 antibiotic orders) who were actively receiving antibiotics were identified. A history of penicillin and cephalosporin ADR was documented in 5.5% and 2.8% of these patients, respectively. When compared to patients with no documented ADR, penicillin ADR patients were more likely to receive a fluoroquinolone for a SSTI infection (odds ratio [OR]: 5.6), surgical prophylaxis (OR: 18.8) or for surgical treatment (OR: 5.2) (see Figure). Conversely, penicillin ADR patients were less likely to receive first-line agents, such as narrow-spectrum penicillin for bacterial LRTI (OR: 0.08) and piperacillin/tazobactam for GI infections (OR: 0.22). Cephalosporin ADR patients exhibited similar patterns with increased use of carbapenems and fluoroquinolones when compared to patients with no ADR. Figure 1: Odds of Receiving Select Antimicrobials Among PCN ADR Patients When Compared to Non-ADR patients, by Indication Conclusion A large, nationwide sample of pediatric patients who were actively prescribed antibiotics helped identify several diagnoses where comprehensive guidelines for appropriate ADR prescribing and increased ADR de-labeling initiatives are needed to ensure optimal treatment. Disclosures Brian R. Lee, MPH, PhD, Merck (Grant/Research Support) Jason Newland, MD, MEd, FPIDS, Merck (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Other Financial or Material Support, Industry funded clinical trial)


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (25) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunilla Skoog ◽  
Johan Struwe ◽  
Otto Cars ◽  
Håkan Hanberger ◽  
Inga Odenholt ◽  
...  

This study sought to analyse antimicrobial pressure, indications for treatment, and compliance with treatment recommendations and to identify possible problem areas where inappropriate use could be improved through interventions by the network of the local Swedish Strategic Programme Against Antibiotic Resistance (Strama) groups. Five point-prevalence surveys were performed in between 49 and 72 participating hospitals from 2003 to 2010. Treatments were recorded for 19 predefined diagnosis groups and whether they were for community-acquired infection, hospital-acquired infection, or prophylaxis. Approximately one-third of inpatients were treated with antimicrobials. Compliance with guidelines for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia with narrow-spectrum penicillin was 17.0% during baseline 2003–2004, and significantly improved to 24.2% in 2010. Corresponding figures for quinolone use in uncomplicated cystitis in women were 28.5% in 2003–2004, and significantly improved, decreasing to 15.3% in 2010. The length of surgical prophylaxis improved significantly when data for a single dose and 1 day were combined, from 56.3% in 2003–2004 to 66.6% in 2010. Improved compliance was possibly the effect of active local feedback, repeated surveys, and increasing awareness of antimicrobial resistance. Strama groups are important for successful local implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in Sweden.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu-Qin Jia ◽  
Feng Pang ◽  
Xin Luo ◽  
Jian Zhang

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to performe a retrospective analysis of prevalence and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections in children in a tertiary hospital. Methods The non-repeat clinical isolates of CRE in children were collected in Liaocheng People's Hospital from January, 2013 to December, 2018. The bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility was performed according to the standard methods. The isolated strains will be detected carbapenemases genotypes and homology analysis. All data on the culture-positive strains and associated clinical infection from different pediatric wards were reviewed. Results A total of 20 CRE strains isolated from pediatric patients, which derived from different infection sites and present a classification of multiple species of Enterobacteriaceae. And the production of IMP-type carbapenemase in these strains is the main reason of antimicrobial resistance. Most of the infected patients have severe comorbidities and invasive procedures, and use insensitive drugs due to the high resistance rates and medication restrictions. Nevertheless, most infected children have been treated despite the resistance of pathogens to multiple antimicrobial agents. In our follow-up survey, most children received adjuvant therapy such as human intravenous immunoglobulin, which may be an important factor in helping patients defeat pathogenic bacteria. Conclusions This study demonstrates a high prevalence of IMP-mediated CRE infection in pediatric patients with severe comorbidities and invasive procedures. Most children have been cured, which may be related to application of adjuvant therapy and weaker pathogenicity of the IMP-type Enterobacteriaceae.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document